About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Newsweek blog: Newspapers Retract 'Climategate' Claims, but Damage Still Done

June 25, 2010 2:54 pm ET by Karl Frisch

Here at Media Matters’ we’ve noted numerous conservative media figures and outlets pushing the bogus “Climategate” scandal to undermine the scientific consensus that climate change is real and caused in-part by human activity. Here are just a few recent examples (though there are many more):

Now Sharon Begley is up with an excellent post on Newsweek's The Gaggle blog that comes to the unfortunate conclusion that British public opinion, which turned “sharply against the established science of climate change” as the result of outlets like The Sunday Times of London pushing the “Climategate” story, aren’t likely to change despite “recent retractions and exonerations.”

Writes Begley:

A lie can get halfway around the world while the truth is still putting its boots on, as Mark Twain said (or “before the truth gets a chance to put its pants on,” in Winston Churchill’s version), and nowhere has that been more true than in "climategate."

[...]

As Twain and Churchill knew, sometimes the truth never catches up with the lie, let alone overtakes it. As I wrote last summer in a story about why people believe lies even when they’re later told the truth, sometimes people’s mental processes simply go off the rails. 

Of course, that's what right-wing media outlets and figure are counting on -- setting public opinion against science before the truth gets in the way.

Begley's entire piece is well worth a read, especially by science deniers with an open mind -- both of them.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (June 25, 2010 4:16 pm ET)
      2  
      Funny how that works. The Troglodyte Media float a story based on lies, distortions or rumors, then they saturate their insidious spiderweb of bullsh*t with the phony story. After ad nauseam repetition, it becomes engrained in the conventional wisdom and gains new life as a viral e-mail. When it turns out not to be true, they walk away, or issue a half-hearted correction, which gets about 30 minutes coverage.

      Meanwhile, their Reptile-Brain audience never knows the difference; they still think it's true.

      This is the method they used to destroy ACORN, too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (June 26, 2010 1:35 am ET)
      2  
      I've noticed the lack of entries by MMFA lately about climate change. Not that they aren't covering it. It's just the denialists seemed to have gone underground (it's cooler there) until winter, when they can come out and say "See, it's too cold for global warming!"

      C'mon denialists! Come out where ever you are!
      Report Abuse