About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Full video vindicates Sherrod, destroys Breitbart's accusations of racism

July 20, 2010 10:39 pm ET by Matt McLaughlin

The NAACP has posted the video of Shirley Sherrod's March 27 speech, and it definitively proves false Andrew Breitbart's claim that the edited video he posted at his BigGovernment.com website is "evidence of racism."

In his first post about the video, Breitbart wrote: "In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn't do everything she can for him, because he is white."

Media Matters previously documented that Breitbart's original post suggested that the actions Sherrod described in the video came in her capacity as the USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development during the Obama administration. In fact, the actions she described came 24 years ago, when she when she worked with the Georgia field office for the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund -- before she began working for the Agriculture Department.

And in the full video, Sherrod recounts how she ultimately helped the farmer avoid the foreclosure on his farm. Indeed, while Breitbart's video included Sherrod saying that she initially didn't to everything she could, it omitted her explanation that later she went to much greater lengths to help the farmer:

SHERROD: So, everything was going along fine -- I'm thinking he's being taken care of by the white lawyer, then they lift the injunction against USDA in May of '87 for two weeks and he was one of 13 farmers in Georgia who received a foreclosure notice. He called me. I said, well, go on and make an appointment at the lawyer. Let me know when it is and I'll meet you there.

So we met at the lawyer's office on the day they had given him. And this lawyer sat there -- he had been paying this lawyer, y'all. That's what got me. He had been paying the lawyer since November, and this was May. And the lawyer sat there and looked at him and said, "Well, y'all are getting old. Why don't you just let the farm go?" I could not believe he said that, so I said to the lawyer -- I told him, I can't believe you said that. I said: It's obvious to me that he cannot file a Chapter 12 bankruptcy to stop this foreclose, you have to file an 11. And the lawyer said to me, I'll do whatever you say -- whatever you think -- that's the way he put it. But he's paying him. He wasn't paying me any money. You know, so he said -- the lawyer said he would work on it.

And then, about seven days before that man would have been sold at the courthouse steps, the farmer called me and said the lawyer wasn't doing anything. And that's when I spent time there in my office calling everybody I could think so to try to see -- help me find the lawyer who would handle this.

She goes on to say how her encounter with the farmer "made me realize then that I needed to work to help poor people" regardless of whether they were black, white, or Hispanic.

Breitbart's video edits out any of Sherrod's remarks about the true nature of her relationship with the farmer -- who today stated that Sherrod did her "level best to help him" -- and about the true meaning of her story.

Following are Sherrod's remarks at the March 27 NAACP Freedom Fund Banquet (the section in bold is what Breitbart's video included -- the rest was omitted):

[11:50] SHERROD: I made the commitment on the night of my father's death at the age of 17 that I would not leave the South, that I would stay in the South and devote my life to working for change. And I've been true to that commitment all of these 45 years.

[...]

[16:34] SHERROD: God is good. I can tell you that. When I made that commitment, I was making that commitment to black people -- and to black people only. But you know God will show you things and he'll put things in your path so that you realize that the struggle is really about poor people --

AUDIENCE: All right. All right.

SHERROD: -- you know. The first time I was faced with having to help a white farmer save his farm. He took a long time talking but he was trying to show me he was superior to me -- I knew what he was doing.

AUDIENCE: All right.

SHERROD: But he had to come to me for help. What he didn't know, while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me, was I was trying to decide just how much I was going to give him. I was struggling with the fact that so many black people have lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So, I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough so that when he -- I assumed that the Department of Agriculture had sent him to me; either that or the Georgia Department of Agriculture -- and he needed to go back and report that I did try to help him. So I took him to a white lawyer that we had -- that had attended some of the training that we had provided 'cause Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted for the family farmer, so I figured if I'd take him to one of them, that his own kind would take care of him.

That's when it was revealed to me that y'all, it's about poor versus those who have, and not so much about white -- it is about white and black, but it's not -- you know, it opened my eyes, 'cause I took him to one of his own and I put him in his hands, and said, OK, I've done my job. But, during that time, we would have these injunctions against the Department of Agriculture and -- so, they couldn't foreclose on him. And I want you to know that the county supervisor had done something to him that I have not seen yet that they've done to any other farmer, black or white. And what they did to him caused him to not be able to file Chapter 12 bankruptcy.

So, everything was going along fine -- I'm thinking he's being taken care of by the white lawyer, then they lift the injunction against USDA in May of '87 for two weeks and he was one of 13 farmers in Georgia who received a foreclosure notice. He called me. I said, well, go on and make an appointment at the lawyer. Let me know when it is and I'll meet you there.

So we met at the lawyer's office on the day they had given him. And this lawyer sat there -- he had been paying this lawyer, y'all. That's what got me. He had been paying the lawyer since November, and this was May. And the lawyer sat there and looked at him and said, "Well, y'all are getting old. Why don't you just let the farm go?" I could not believe he said that, so I said to the lawyer -- I told him, I can't believe you said that. I said: It's obvious to me that he cannot file a Chapter 12 bankruptcy to stop this foreclose, you have to file an 11. And the lawyer said to me, I'll do whatever you say -- whatever you think -- that's the way he put it. But he's paying him. He wasn't paying me any money. You know, so he said -- the lawyer said he would work on it.

And then, about seven days before that man would have been sold at the courthouse steps, the farmer called me and said the lawyer wasn't doing anything. And that's when I spent time there in my office calling everybody I could think so to try to see -- help me find the lawyer who would handle this. And finally, I remembered that I had gone to see one just 40 miles away in Americus with the black farmers. So, I --

[VIDEO CUT*]

SHERROD: Well, working with him made me see that it's really about those who have versus those who don't.

AUDIENCE: That's right.

SHERROD: You know, and they could be black, and they could be white, they could be Hispanic. And it made me realize then that I needed to work to help poor people -- those who don't have access the way others have.

I want to just share something with you and I think it helps to -- you know, when I learned this, I'm like, oh, my goodness. You know, back in the late 17th and 18th century, black -- there were black indentured servants and white indentured servants, and they all would work for seven years and get their freedom. And they didn't see any difference in each other -- nobody worried about skin color. They married each other. You know, these were poor whites and poor blacks in the same boat, except they were slaves, but they were both slaves and both had their opportunity to work out on the slavery.

But then they started looking at the injustices that they faced and started then trying -- you know, the people with money -- you know, they started -- the poor whites and poor blacks -- they -- you know, they married each other. They lived together. They were just like we would be. And they started looking at what was happening to them and decided we need to do something about it -- you know, about this. Well, the people with money, the elite, decided, hey, we need to do something here to divide them.

So that's when they made black people servants for life. That's when the put laws in place forbidding them to marry each other. That's when they created the racism that we know of today. They did it to keep us divided. And they -- it started working so well, they said, gosh, looks like we've come up on something here that can last generations -- and here we are. Over 400 years later, and it's still working. What we have to do is get that out of our heads. There is no difference between us.

The only difference is that the folks with money want to stay in power and whether it's health care or whatever it is, they'll do what they need to do to keep that power.

[APPLAUSE]

[...]

[25:03] SHERROD: I couldn't say 45 years ago, I couldn't stand here and say what I'm saying -- what I will say to you tonight. Like I told, God helped me to see that its not just about black people, it's about poor people. And I've come a long way. I knew that I couldn't live with hate, you know. As my mother has said to so many, if we had tried to live with hate in our hearts, we'd probably be dead now.

But I've come to realize that we have to work together and -- you know, it's sad that we don't have a room full of white and blacks here tonight 'cause we have to overcome the divisions that we have. We have to get to the point as Tony Morrison said race exists but it doesn't matter. We have to work just as hard -- I know it's -- you know, that division is still here, but our communities are not going to thrive -- you know, our children won't have the communities that they need to be able to stay in and live in and have a good life if we can't figure this out, you all. White people, black people, Hispanic people, we all have to do our part to make our communities a safe place, a healthy place, a good environment.

* According to Jake Tapper, "NAACP says the tape was changed at the 21:00 mark. no edits, just a tape change."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Pinhead (July 20, 2010 10:51 pm ET)
      15  
      I hope this will end Breitbart's career. Not bloody likely, but one can hope.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (July 20, 2010 10:57 pm ET)
      12 1
      Breitbart edited a video to make a false point? I don't believe in anything anymore!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kromecom48 (July 21, 2010 7:56 am ET)
        1  
        Sorry Wookie, because you can't trust former drudgereport operative doesn't mean you shouldn't trust anyone. That's just naive. Anyone who believes that Fox is a legitimate news operations would have to be naive. I'm giving you a thumbs down on this one.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cripdyke (July 21, 2010 5:14 pm ET)
             
          I think you're missing the very heavy dose of sarcasm, Krome. Based on sarcasm, I give it a Thumbs up...as I've noticed most others have done. Perhaps you should check your faceti-o-meter?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by EFHUTTON (July 21, 2010 11:20 am ET)
        1  
        wookie believe in yourself and trust your instincts, Life is not fair people do all kinds of crazy things but we must push forward and do what we know to do is right.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Louise08902 (July 22, 2010 1:32 am ET)
        1  
        I think there are bigger problems here, aside from the fact that people are acting like it's a surprise.

        1.) There is a sizable group of people who believe anything Breitbart says, because he is one of the "good guys" of reporting. These are the Gullibles, who do not believe in facts that are verified by science or statistics or basic historical facts.
        2.) Then there are the Haters, that are rabidly anti-Obama and the "Dimmocraps" or whatever cunning sobriquet they are using this week. They loathe him. They loath Liberals and Progressives and Democrats and RINOs and even Moderates. These are the guys that would love a Civil War, because they are certain they would win. And the Democrats that didn't convert would get a bullet if they were veterans, and to the guillotines for the rest. (I guess they would have an argument about the oldest old which was safe to keep a Democrat child and adopt it ....which leads to a discussion of "Liberalism - Innate or Learned?"

        Breitbart has an audience. How many people do you think stopped believing in him as a creditable source as a result of this? If you believe in him, this won't change you.

        What it DID change was the gullibility of the lazy-ass Washington/political press corps. For God's sake, guys, you have been getting PLAYED by Ailes because he knows you are too busy to double-check a goddamned single fact! You see a tape and - boom! - you run with it. There's no time for skepticism - lest you get scooped.

        For God's sake, give me a more skeptical media, even if it means having its reporting be an hour or so behind the other guys. At least I'll know that I can *trust* what I get from you, as opposed to the regurgitated horseshit I get from the others.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (July 20, 2010 10:59 pm ET)
      11 1
      None of us is Perfect and we all Fall Short.
      Andrew Breitbart intentionally Hurt That Sweet Black Woman just for Sport.
      He wanted to Hurt the NAACP, an Organization that protected Blacks from Lynchings.
      I gave up a long time ago on my 40 Acres & my 2 Mules, Promises Broken & Reminscing.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (July 20, 2010 11:05 pm ET)
      10  

      It may vindicate the one and destroy the accusations of the other, but it doesn't turn back the clock not a single minute, nor does it alter in the least the first impression made on the minds of who knows how many people who were fed the edited video in the first place, along with the false accusation.

      I note this not to rain on the truth, or even to minimize any issued corrections (of which there may be none don't hold your breath), but to point out that whoever edited the video in the first place, didn't give a damn about the truth anyway, and they still don't I'm sure...

      That's the way these people play you know, everything they do they do with intention and malice both... they are neither stupid or incompetent, and so it makes little sense to accuse them of either.

      That would be letting them off too easy, that's letting them plead to the least of all charges.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Übermensch (July 20, 2010 11:54 pm ET)
        6  
        Watching John King tonight, it was apparent that the charge of racism/quick termination of employment (weather self or handed down) is no longer the issue.

        The new issue is going to be how the media handles the information and people reactions to it before getting the whole story.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dem02020 (July 21, 2010 12:27 am ET)
          9  

          And if I'm understanding your reference correctly, then yes that's what it should be about, it should about people manipulating the media and manipulating the American electorate, in a campaign season.

          And even if I'm misunderstanding whether that's the point here, I don't want to be misunderstood myself, I couldn't care less who Shirley Sherrod is or what she did or did not say, it's not about her, it's about the racism card being played by a media cabal that serves Republicans politically, and is led in it's highest profile by Fox television news (and it's Fox who brings us this brietelbart character isn't it).

          And yet that will be the stupid and strange twist this story could take, make it all about the woman, keep showing her face, keep repeatedly airing the video tape, ask again and again was she done wrong, is she owed an apology, was she misconstrued, what's really in her mind, let's get her for an interview, let's get her face on air...

          It's not about her and it never was!

          It's about the unbelievable level of racism being injected into the media in this campaign season... let's talk about that a little bit.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (July 21, 2010 12:08 am ET)
        12  
        First of all I am a Republican and I am white, and the minute I heard what Breitbart did, I was furious. I expect the Republican Party to point out this racist behavior and if they do not, I shall leave the party. Obviously, our party has very little integrity left but alas, it is time for me to move on. If they do not condemn this goof, then I will know that the entire party has lost it's moral rudder. That is a sad thing for me to say, too.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kromecom48 (July 21, 2010 8:01 am ET)
          1  
          And as a long-time democrat if the Onama Admin doesn't apololize and re-instate Sherrod, I'll be registering as an independent as well. They reactively caved to right wing misninformation and they better grow a backbone soon or they've lost me.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kromecom48 (July 21, 2010 8:03 am ET)
            1  
            Eek! Meant Obama admin.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by EFHUTTON (July 21, 2010 11:30 am ET)
            1  
            Kromecom48, the President did not fire her it was Tom who did it and now he knows the real truth. Don't let this incident detour you, but instead let's stand together and press forward,
            Report Abuse
        • Author by armendale (July 21, 2010 4:13 pm ET)
          1  
          the sad part is that it would've taken you this long to realize the GOP has been rudderless and devoid of integrity for a long, long time.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (July 20, 2010 11:14 pm ET)
      8 1
      Shirley Sherrod needs to be reinstated with apologies from Secretary Vilsack and the president. Can Breitbart be sued for damages?


      Ideally, of course, Vilsack would resign in shame and Sherrod would get his job. But at the very least the wrong inflicted on this dedicated and honorable public servant must be undone.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by norcalgal (July 20, 2010 11:44 pm ET)
        1  
        Shirley Sherrod needs to be reinstated with apologies from Secretary Vilsack and the president. Can Breitbart be sued for damages?

        That poor lady got it from both ends and she should be reinstated.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (July 21, 2010 12:10 am ET)
        6  
        She also needs to sure Breitbart so he will pay a price for his disgusting racism.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (July 21, 2010 1:13 am ET)
        3 3
        In the world we live in, she can't be hired back. She would be a liability to the USDA.

        Even if, in a perfect world, or even a less than perfect world, she shouldn't be blamed today for that initial lack of doing her utmost for the guy. We live in a world so poisoned by the toxic nonsense coming from the rightwingers that she can't keep that position in the world we inhabit currently.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by internet soldier (July 21, 2010 8:16 am ET)
          1
        Vilsack was probably just the fall guy for this decision. He's being a good little soldier and taking a hit for the man who gave him his position. Ultimately, however, the buck stops with the president, and it's probable that Sherrod's firing couldn't have happened without his approval.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by JohnHerald (July 21, 2010 4:16 pm ET)
          2  
          Rush to judgment is what defines the Sherrod story up to this point. For everyone, from Vilsack and the NAACP to Fox and most blogs on the Internet. Best not to add to the injury until more is revealed. In fact, we'd all be better off, left or right, with less speculation, better fact checking and a deep breath every now and then.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by NoSpinner (July 20, 2010 11:18 pm ET)
      6  
      I watched the full video and I was impressed with the speech.
      Just imagine everyone, if there was no alternate video source, then we would never have had access to the whole tape from Breitbart.
      It's also lucky that the white couple stepped forward immediately to vindicate her.
      Without these two events, Breitbart would have destroyed an innocent person's character. (I am assuming that the Obama administration will do the decent thing and rehire her - of course she could sue and get millions and retire.)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (July 20, 2010 11:24 pm ET)
      12  
      What I don't get about Breitbart is this: was he dumb enough to think that no one would check about this, was he so arrogant that he thought that he would get away about this, or both?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by roland (July 21, 2010 12:07 am ET)
        12  
        Why should he have thought otherwise? After all, he didn't really get called on the carpet for his deceptive work on the ACORN videos, except by Rachel Maddow and a few others in the media (and the judge in the case). But the vast majority who saw the tapes have probably never heard about the deception.

        The miracle here is that the truth actually came out quickly and loudly. Chalk up a rare victory for justice.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eb (July 21, 2010 9:10 am ET)
             
          Exactly, these tactics work. I was listening to our local right wing news show last night and they had some nut libertarian repeating all these allegations as if they were rock solid gospel truth.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by MGDubya (July 21, 2010 12:10 am ET)
           
        Breitbart doesn't care. His goal was to make the Dem's look silly for their knee jerk reaction to a charge of racism. His overall goal is to delegitimize the accusation of racism in our public discourse. Breitbart wants black racism against whites to be seen in 2010 as being just as bad as white racism against blacks.

        Breitbart is relying on the MSM to not point out his record of manipulation (ie:ACORN). Breitbart's goal is to throw sand in the gears of public debate and refute any consensus that there indeed may be racists elements within the Tea Party movement. Breitbart wants viewers to equate Tea Party racism with that of the NAACP. In order to succeed he needs willing abetters in the MSM.

        Breitbart has succeeded so far by confusing viewers, Breitbart hopes to undermine
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (July 21, 2010 1:15 am ET)
        3 1
        Rightwing posters here all the time think that we can't see old posts and previous replies! It's ridiculous, but true. Their delusions are mighty powerful.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Porkeater (July 21, 2010 1:22 am ET)
        3  
        was he dumb enough to think that no one would check about this, was he so arrogant that he thought that he would get away about this, or both?

        I reckon he doesn't really care. If retractions come, the damage is already done; that poor woman is marked. And for weeks people will be talking about this as though it had never been exposed as a fraud.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by EFHUTTON (July 21, 2010 11:56 am ET)
        1  
        Yes this is what he thought and frankly he did not care, he has so much hate in him until his brain has been turned into mush.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Hamburgler (July 21, 2010 1:22 am ET)
        13
      Well how about that? That must be the first time that mediamatter.org actually published the truth about anything. That is a good start, keep it coming. That is if George Soros will allow it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (July 21, 2010 1:31 am ET)
        3  
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAOxY_nHdew

        Just for you, bee1cee2.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by redrage (July 21, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
           
        Reaaly, this is the best that you can do? If MMFA treats the truth so shabbily, give me an easy top ten, or five, list of their biggest whoppers.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mauman (July 21, 2010 1:35 am ET)
      4  
      Sounds like Shirley is a good woman.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (July 21, 2010 4:49 am ET)
      1  
      Republican party media has been played again,by the President Obama.Do people really believe that Brietbart fooled President Obama and he did not know nor check the full context of the remarks made and their timing before a firing was ordered.Fox news,and republican party media started a high stakes race poker game bluffing.They bluffed by firing Mark Williams,who works for the Koch family.Therefore they could not fire him anyway.President Obama raised the stakes and sacrificed a real lamb on the known false revelation of fox news calling for the sacrifice.The only way fox news and republican party media can stay in this game is to to sacrifice one of their lambs,when a revelation is made public calling for it.If they can't then they need to get out of the game.Rush Limbaugh has been on a ruling class,country class kick for the past week.How will this effect fox news,and republican party media to have a country man(small farmer)on MSN for a few days talking about the rotten thing fox news,and republican party media have,done,and their methods.Do you think the farmer was called,and told to get ready before the firing?With all the Scientoligist working at fox,and republican party media you'd think they would read the full script,and the results of news the operation L.Ron Hubbard wrote about that they try so hard to immitate.Ms, Sherrod should be elgible for a decent retirement,and inspired to do bigger things.Fox news,and republiacn party may get by by overestimating how dumb their audience is.But underestimating how smart the enemies the make are will be their down fall.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (July 21, 2010 6:17 am ET)
      4  
      That is one terrific, American speech. It should be required viewing in every classroom in the United States, to remind us what this country is all about at its best.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Louise08902 (July 22, 2010 1:37 am ET)
           
        I can only hope that Obama does the smart thing and brings Ms. Sherrod to the White House and has her deliver that speech from the Rose Garden.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by freerider (July 21, 2010 8:05 am ET)
      1  
      Next time MM sends a spokesperson to GMA, send someone with guts who won't get completely rolled by Breitbart.

      It was an embarrassing display of mealy-mouthiness the way he allowed himself to be bullied cut-off repeatedly. Breitbart went on for minutes uninterrupted, then promptly interrupted MM and like a wimp, MM just shut up and let Breitbart divert and lie.

      There was no clapping and cheering when Sherrod recounted her story.

      You people are pathetic!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 21, 2010 8:07 am ET)
      1  
      Sherrod should not only be reinstated, by given a public apology by her management, and perhaps the administration (just to drive home the point.) What's more, those same entities should issue a strong, public condemnation of Brietbart and his use of edited video in this manner, and of the media that enables him.

      And any media sources that ran this story should themselves issue not only a clear correction but a public apology for doing so, including their own condemnation of Brietbart and of his brand of what he calls "journalism" but what common law calls "libel" and "slander."

      (And actually, all of these entities doing such - resoring Sherrod's reputation - would actually SAVE Brietbart from getting sued by her. She's may have been a public servant, but was not a public figure until he made her one, and she'd have a pretty open and shut case here!)

      Her full restoration and public exhoneration, combined with a universal (minus Fox), robust condemnation of Brietbart and what he calls journalism would represent a large nail in the coffin of his credability and career.

      He's a racist, a hypocrite and an un-American, sub-Human scumbag.

      ------------------------------------------
      IMHO
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bronwyn (July 21, 2010 11:39 pm ET)
           
        So far the best Fox News can do is condemn everyone else, mainly the White House for jumping to conclusions. Not apologizing for their own outrageous behavior and jumping to conclusions. Projection! Projection!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by srstange (July 21, 2010 8:40 am ET)
      2  
      I applaud Media Matters and Rachel Maddow show staff in their efforts to get to the bottom of this race baiting Breitbart stink bomb. Faux News not only probably knows that this report was not the whole story, but that it also creates the kind of controversy for which they are infamous. In the end, Tea Baggers, Rupert Murdoch & friends, and ultimately the Republican Party KNOW that they are manipulating naive reactionary Americans. It is easy to toss these bombs into the mediasphere. It requires little to no research. What takes the time is digging out the facts and recasting these stories in their factual basis. Most Americans either don't have this kind of time, or simply prefer to watch Dancing with the Stars to reading the muckrakers. I am frightened for our future. If Americans can and do support Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber, Limbaugh the Drug Addict, Beck the Train Wreck, and ultimately Rupert Murdoch we are in for some difficult sailing ahead. Put on your life jacket.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by responsibility_matters (July 21, 2010 8:57 am ET)
        1
      Apparently no one has figured out what really happened here. What Brietbart is attempting to point out is not Ms. Sherrod's racism, but the racism that is present in the audience, as evidenced by the audience's approval (clapping) when Ms. Sherrod tells of committing her racist act.

      It has nothing to do with the rest of her story, that's not the point. We can see by watching the video that she had seen the error of her way, and is a better person for it. She should not have been fired, she seems to be a fine person to me. The point again, for those that didn't get it the first time, or the second time, is to exemplify the fact that racism exists in small doses in every organization, from the Tea Party to the NAACP.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Louise08902 (July 22, 2010 1:18 am ET)
           
        That argument is a pathetic after-the-fact justification. The Right was ALL over this story from 8 AM Monday ....and it was about Sherrod, not the NAACP. It was about Sherrod, a black woman official in the Obama administration. An appointee. And there was a tape of this woman admitting she'd discriminated financially against a farmer *because* he was white and she was black!

        "Our side caught a scalp! We got the scalp of a racist Obama USDA appointee! Listen to this!"

        And a link to Breitbart's story.

        It was all over everywhere by 9 AM. It was *planted* by a very savvy advance team. The storyline explicitly was: "This woman is a racist; listen listen to her. This is an OBAMA appointee." Translation: That racist Obama is "burrowing" hate-whitey racists into the Federal government. Hell, Laura Ingraham said it *officially* on Fox!

        It was only after the story of the speech came out, both that it was her telling a story about an event that had happened 24 years ago, and that it was heavily edited, did the story morph into "Oooooh, it's really about that racist NAACP!"

        The fact is that the reaction of the NAACP is only "racist" if it, like her speech, stops when the edited version does. Because as you listen to the entire tape, the crowd gets obviously more testimonial and responsive in agreement as the speech progresses. They are noticeably clapping and encouraging the speech as it sums up.

        The NAACP is ANYTHING but racist in this tape's entirety.

        So we all remember what this tape's importance *is*, according to you. How dumb do you think we are? Don't yank our chains.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sttbs (July 21, 2010 10:00 am ET)
      2  
      Breitbart is scum. He knew what he was doing. I hope Shirley sues his pants off. Go after faux news too Shirley.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kewe65 (July 21, 2010 1:24 pm ET)
      1  
      A teachable moment on so many levels - on race relations, on journalistic responsibility, on the need for reasonable and sensible discourse in politics, completely destroyed by megalomaniacs. This story crystallizes so much right now about politics, government, education, equality...

      Now, isn't this the perfect moment to pull out this line?: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

      So, fool me three times? The media should never have been duped in the first place. If Vilsack and the administration get this right, that's step one. Step two is finding a backbone so it doesn't happen again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sciguy (July 21, 2010 2:45 pm ET)
      1  
      I urge everyone to contact Tom Vilsack (http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?...) and let him know that Ms. Sherrod deserves an apology and her job back.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by sciguy (July 21, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
           
        Sorry about that bad link. Here it is: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome
        Report Abuse
      • Author by sciguy (July 21, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
        1  
        Sorry about that bad link. Here it is: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.