About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Sherrod: I'm a Victim of Breitbart, Fox 'Racism'

July 21, 2010 11:40 am ET by Joe Strupp

Shirley Sherrod, the former Agriculture Department Georgia Director of Rural Development, says she is a victim. A victim of poor reporting and, as she contends, clear bias and racist coverage from both Andrew Breitbart and Fox News.

"When you look at their reporting, this is just another way of seeing that they are (racist)," Sherrod told me about Fox in a lengthy interview Tuesday night. "But I have seen that before now. I saw their reporting as biased during the Bush Administration and the Clinton Administration."

Sherrod was forced to resign on Monday after a portion of a taped speech she gave last March was posted at Breitbart's Biggovernment.com.

In the edited tape, she spoke about how she had not initially helped a white farmer as much as she could have in 1986 when he was going to lose his farm. In the posting, Breitbart made it appear as though the story had occurred during her time as a federal official and not 24 years ago when she worked for a non-profit organization.

Breitbart also did not include the entire context of the speech, in which she later explained that she learned from the situation and ended up helping the farmer, Roger Spooner and his wife. Both Spooners spoke out several times Tuesday to support Sherrod and voice that they would have lost their farm if not for her help.

Breitbart has since posted the full version of the tape, but his original posting also remains.

"It was a time when I realized that they did some of the same things to white farmers that they did to black farmers," Sherrod said about the speech. "I thought that all white farmers got the best treatment, but I found out in this case that was not so."

Explaining the speech further, Sherrod said, "I am trying to say to the people there that it is time for us to move forward. We do not want to forget the past and be in a position that racism is there and we don't see it. We want to move together. Our area of the state cannot grow and thrive until we learn to get along."

But after Breitbart posted the video clip, Sherrod said the lack of context and explanation sparked anger against her. She said she found out about the clip when someone e-mailed a link to her and asked about it.

"I couldn't believe it. I found this out when someone sent me (a link to) the tape, people who follow him, who put it out there," Sherrod said about Breitbart. "I got crank calls right away. Someone sent me an e-mail and link and said 'shame on you' and other stuff. I was sitting in a meeting and I was really upset.

"I texted back that they were so wrong and that they need to know the message and they got it wrong."

Sherrod said Cheryl Cook, USDA deputy undersecretary, called her Monday and said she had to be on administrative leave."

She adds: "People were calling and writing the Department of Agriculture in Athens, Ga., and Washington to tell them about it. That I needed to be fired. That a racist like me had no business working for the department. That is the way they intimidate people and it worked."

By the end of the day Monday, she was forced to resign.

Sherrod, 62, said her first reaction was shock that, after a career working for civil rights and as the daughter of a father murdered by racists, she would be seen in such a terrible light.

"To have people say that I was such a racist was unbelievable," she said of the fallout from the video and Fox coverage. "My whole life, if you look into what I have done, my father was murdered in 1965. If you look at all of us, we all hurt with that and we got involved into the movement and channeled our effort into good, instead of hating.

"I am getting hate calls and e-mails at this point. I got one call last night at my house at 12:30 a.m. that said 'you lost your job, good for you' and 'bitch' There are people out there who will believe that I am a racist person, even though the story is getting out there." 

She said her husband, Charles, and her two children, who also live nearby in Athens, Ga., were surprised, but have been toughened by years of seeing her work in the civil rights movement: "They had to grow up in the movement so they have had to deal with stuff like this through the years. We did not always take the easy road. They have some thick skin as a result."

But the clear damage to Sherrod comes from Breitbart, who posted the tape without context, and Fox, which ran with the story and did not seek to confirm it.

"The news media should tell it like it is and not the way they want it to be," she said.

Sherrod said Breitbart never contacted her before posting the video clip to ask about it.

"I never heard that name until a few minutes ago," she said Tuesday night about Breitbart. "He never contacted me. I think they intended it to be what it ended up being, a racist thing that could unite even more the racist people out there who follow them."

She also said Fox News never checked the facts with her before posting a story and the video clip.

"Not before they reported it," she said of Fox's negligence. "They have called me today and initially I had said yes (to an interview), but I thought about it and I did not think they intended to be fair in their reporting. They are going to say what they want to say regardless of what I say."

She said Fox showed no professionalism in continuing to bother her for an interview, but failing to correct their coverage.

"I think they should but they won't. They intended exactly what they did. They were looking for the result they got yesterday," she said of Fox. "I am just a pawn. I was just here. They are after a bigger thing, they would love to take us back to where we were many years ago. Back to where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person."

Still, Fox continued to push for an interview with her, Sherrod said.

"It was unbelievable. I am refusing to be on there. They have been calling me and calling me. I have refused to do an interview because they are biased," she explained. "I don't think Fox News does it fairly. It is worse so now. I have sat and listened to the way they cover the news even before this administration and I saw what was going on."

Sherrod said this situation has worsened her view of racism in media coverage.

"I think it is race. You think we have come a long way in terms of race relations in this country, but we keep going backwards," she said. "We have become more racist. This was their doing, Breitbart put that together misrepresenting what I was saying and Fox carried it."

Sherrod said she has gotten no future job offers and believes this will scar her reputation forever, even if all the facts come out.

"There will be people who always think of this," she said. "I can see in the future whatever I do, this story will be recounted, no matter what. This will be brought up. People will constantly be trying to point out negative things."

Have other job offers come up? "No, no one. People are afraid of me now, I guess, with all of this. That is the other fallout from this. Anyone would be afraid of me, maybe I am a troublemaker, a racist."

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said he is reviewing the matter, hinting that Sherrod could possibly get her job back.

Asked if she would return if asked, she said: "I think I would have to go back for a short time, even if I did not stay for a long haul. I would need to prove a point, that I can be bigger than them. I was doing a lot of good things. People had access to that office that never did before. I had reached out to the poorest counties."

Despite that, she plans to carry on.

"I will go back to doing what I was doing before, working with people, trying to build," she said. "There are a lot of projects in Georgia I have been involved in creating. I will get busy with that again."

Sherrod said she is considering legal action, perhaps against Breitbart, Fox or the federal government:

"I don't know enough to know. I wish I did. I would love to sue. I am going to talk about it. I have been getting calls from all over the country. I don't want to leave one stone unturned."

Sherrod said she has been helped by many media outlets, such as CNN and others that have allowed her to explain the truth, enough so that the NAACP retracted a statement Tuesday that had denounced her.

She said that has convinced her to trust some media outlets, noting she had plans to be on Good Morning America and NPR Wednesday.

"The only one I refused to do is Fox," she said, adding the fair coverage by others "makes me think highly of some of the media, but not any better about Fox. It is a bad taste in my mouth dealing with them. It would help some if they apologized and say they were wrong, but I don't see that happening."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Major Tom (July 21, 2010 12:07 pm ET)
      25 3
      Sue Breitbart. Sue the SOB... and Fox if possible, surely they aren't above the law, surely they can be held accountable for something...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (July 21, 2010 4:21 pm ET)
        2 2
        Unfortunately, Sherrod doesn't have the financial means to do so.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by indigo1968 (July 21, 2010 4:35 pm ET)
          12 2
          An attorney can always take the case pro bono.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kromecom48 (July 21, 2010 4:52 pm ET)
            12 1
            Not only pro-bono. They can take it on contingency and make millions. That's how John Edwards became a multi-millionaire for suing Tobacco companies. They'll only do contingency if they're sure they will . . . and they most certainly will.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by spooky3 (July 21, 2010 11:51 pm ET)
              2 1
              Wow, if JE were a civil rights attorney, this might be an opportunity for professional redemption for him, as well as a an opportunity for her to get justice from these vicious people. Of course, I would think there would be quite a few great attorneys lined up already to take this case.

              I hope at least some of the people who made fun of Hillary Clinton for discussing the vast right-wing conspiracy realize she was right all along. If this incident (along with the massive amount of evidence that MMFA has accumulated over the years on other incidents) doesn't convince people, they are not interested in reality and evidence. Nothing will convince them because they want to believe otherwise.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by covered (July 22, 2010 2:53 am ET)
              3 1
              Not anymore, folks. We have tort reform now, thanks to the rethugs. The courthouse is closed to the little guy...unless you're being sentenced for a joint.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Illinoisian (July 23, 2010 7:18 am ET)
                1 5
                Ummmmmmm - who wouldn't put anything about tort reform in the health care garbage bill? Oh yeah, that would be the dums.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (July 23, 2010 2:27 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Interesting. Guess you aren't interested in coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, allowing young adults to continue on their parents' insurance plan, mitigating the insane "doughnut hole" in drug benefits, and on and on.

                  You are not interested in the topic either? Which is Faux and fiends and their attack machine.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:15 pm ET)
          6 1
          This would be a contingency case . . . most Plaintiffs' cases are. The attorney doesn't get paid unless she does. They do it on a percentage basis. It's the defense side which gets paid by the hour . . . usually paid by the defendant's insurance company.

          I'm ALL for suing this slimy little jerk, together with any benefactors who are hiding under rocks.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dpolitico752260 (July 21, 2010 7:09 pm ET)
          5 2
          I'll take the case! Who wouldn't want to help this woman and sue FOX News and Breitbart in the process? Slander, libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress, punitive damages.... Let's go!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by winnie altomare (July 21, 2010 8:37 pm ET)
          4  
          The airways belong to the American people - not to Foxaganda or anyone else! Contact the FCC and remind them of this - let the FCC know that we know who owns the airwaves and its not Foxaganda. The head of cummunications at the White House better get a back bone and refrain from reacting to the the antidemocratic, republican, propaganda that comes out of that pretend network. Are republican so history ignorant that they don't know the nazis came to power with propaganda. Are the repubicans so desparate to take power that they resort to the tactics of the nazis. If they can't win elections its because the pay homage to the wingnuts. 78% of the guests on Foxaganda are republicans. O'Riely says he only said shut up 6 times. I counted at least 60 so he lies when he continues to say 6 times. Wake up America you are being led down the garden path. The tea party is now in the House of Representatives and those wingnuts like Burton and P. Sessions and some others. Danger is among us and too many Americans refuse to see it.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by UnionDame (July 21, 2010 9:58 pm ET)
          2 1
          Most of these cases are done on a contingency basis, where the attorney is paid only when the case is resolved to the good of the plaintiff.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by AC_Mem (July 21, 2010 10:09 pm ET)
          10 1
          I guarantee you that there will be attorneys that will be there to help her. Absolutely, 100%. And probably will help her get a book deal and a movie. After this, she deserves to be set for life. These people set out to DESTROY her.

          Big big life lesson here, for so many. She is helping to expose the hate and lies and that takes a very strong soul.

          My local talk radio host was spewing hate about her with the lies yesterday on my way home. I never call these creeps but I had to this time. I called him to tell him that he was wrong, that he didn't do his research and that he wasn't telling the whole story and crucifying this woman. He SCREAMED at me and basically called me an idiot. Today he had to eat a big fat slice of humble pie and apologize to his listeners and he played the entire audio of her speech.

          Ms. Shirley, you did have many voices speaking for you yesterday. I wish you and your family the very best.

          Annette
          Report Abuse
          • Author by legalmark (July 22, 2010 5:08 am ET)
            7 1
            i'm proud of you Annette...though i live way out in Nigeria, i'm happy to know that there still are people who can stand up to be counted on the side of truth...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by AC_Mem (July 22, 2010 9:22 pm ET)
              5  
              Thank you - each and every voice counts. I think we need to do more than just post our opinions against this stuff, we need to speak up and most importantly VOTE.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by SkeeterVT (July 22, 2010 6:25 am ET)
        9 1

        Indeed. Andrew Breitbart clearly deserves to be sued for libel.

        Breitbart, a right-wing extremist driven by a deep-seeded hatred of liberals/progressives, was so driven by his anti-liberal hatred that he abandoned the rules of journalistic fairness and committed libel against Shirley Sherrod by posting that edited tape knowing full well that the material it was posting was false. Reckless disregard for the truth is grounds for a libel suit.

        Breitbart committed defamation against Sherrod's character by accusing her of being a racist, when the full videotape of her speech clearly shows that she is not. Deliberate defamation of a person's character constitutes malice and is grounds for a libel suit.

        I hope that Sherrod sues Breitbart for everything he's got.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by oorfenegro (July 22, 2010 4:12 pm ET)
        2  
        Suing for libel or slander is very hard, with a very high burden of proof on the plaintiffs. If a media outlet immediately apologizes or runs a correction/retraction, it usually kills any chance of a suit. Also to get a libel or slandar suit to trial the courts require "malice" and a "releckless disregard for the truth" meaaning you knew the story was false but you ran it anyway. Fox and the other folks usually say they assumed questionable clips were factual. Malice means there was an intent to embarrass or shame a person by running a story that would put a person in a negative light.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Illinoisian (July 23, 2010 7:17 am ET)
          5
        Fox reported on this story after Sherrod resigned. Yes, they did go after it, but it reminds me of the time the news thought they had the goods on G.W. and his National Guard record. Can you say Rathergate? Just another non-story, right?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (July 23, 2010 11:25 am ET)
          4  
          You mean the story that turned out to be true and Rather had to resign anyway? That story? Oh, sure, that's exactly the same thing.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tman418 (July 23, 2010 11:47 am ET)
            2  
            Well, the story was true, but the documents were forged. It was almost lazy journalism, making up documents showing GWB's AWOL when there was already copies of those records available, true copies.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by tman418 (July 23, 2010 11:47 am ET)
            1  
            Well, the story was true, but the documents were forged. It was almost lazy journalism, making up documents showing GWB's AWOL when there was already copies of those records available, true copies.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Old_Benjamin (July 23, 2010 11:26 am ET)
          3  
          Not the same at all - but to go with your analogy, who at FOX should be fired?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by tman418 (July 23, 2010 11:52 am ET)
          4  
          Actually, FOX had this story on their website TWICE before she resigned.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (July 21, 2010 12:47 pm ET)
      10 1
      Classy lady. We could do well to have more like her in positions of authority.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by HairyTBag (July 21, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
        2 21
        Man, your definition of class is very low.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (July 21, 2010 8:24 pm ET)
          2  
          Give me some examples of what you consider classy behavior.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (July 21, 2010 10:08 pm ET)
          2 1
          Reported...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by UnoMcfly (July 21, 2010 11:29 pm ET)
          3 1
          Are you saying that you have 1st hand knowledge of Mrs. Sherrod's character or class as anything else then what has been reported, which IMHO has been top-tier according to the Spooner family & Mr. Vilsack
          Report Abuse
        • Author by tfd829 (July 22, 2010 5:35 pm ET)
          1 1
          DROP DEAD TROLL
          Report Abuse
    • Author by night-n-day (July 21, 2010 12:49 pm ET)
      22 3
      The wingnuts seems to stepped off a cliff with this one. She's got their number completely: FOX/Breitbart are stoking anti-black sentiment among white people solely because the president is black and they don't believe black people should be considered equal.

      Apparently, having Limbaugh spew racist bile 5 days a week, and FOX spewing racist bile 24/7 wasn't quite anti-black enough for them.

      Good luck, rightwingers, in your fight to urge Americans to hate blacks! I can't see a downside in a country that' becoming increasingly multi-ethnic.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 21, 2010 1:48 pm ET)
        1 21
        Among what "white people"?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 3:25 pm ET)
          10 1
          Ah, you finally found some racism to defend, huh, doughie?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by HairyTBag (July 21, 2010 5:54 pm ET)
            4 17
            She had an epiphany about helping all poor people, not just black ones, years after she had been working for the Dept. of Agriculture. So, before this epiphany, she was acting as a racist only helping blacks. THAT is racist. I'm glad that she finally realized what she had been doing was wrong. A good chunk of those in attendance were laughing and smiling when she said she was only helping blacks. What's up with that, bintx?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (July 21, 2010 8:28 pm ET)
              7 1
              Give us a time hack on your evidence along with the words used.

              The applause as I hear it is for overcoming a prejudice. You think a multi ethnic group is going to applaud sticking it to whitey when whitey is a part of the group?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:28 am ET)
                2 10
                No, there was approval and applause when she was talking about her racism. That was one of the reasons Breitbart gave for bringing forward the video.

                I want to know why Sherrod has suddenly decided that Fox and Breitbart are to blame, and that they are racist? Fox did not air anything until after she was asked to resign.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 12:45 pm ET)
                  8 1
                  It wasn't sudden you remember or obviously not she said she was the victim of a smear by Faux and Brietbart. The history of Faux and Brietbart using issues of race to divide and scare people has been documented at this site probably since it's inception.

                  Shirley Sherrod sure if their was a reason to be rascist had one. How do you ignore what was done to her and her fasmily? Her father and uncle murdered by white fsrmers that never faced justice. The cases thrown out because you had to prove that at the time of the murders you had to prove that the murderers intent was to deprive the victims of their civil rights. WTF! How did you forget the part of her story where she says her father wanting a son for over 17yrs. being murdered 2 months before the birth of his only son and their house having a cross burned on their front lawn by "gator" the sheriff and the local Klan. Gator who bragged about killing and beating black farmers and never being prosecuted for his crimes. How could you forget the parts where she describes the poor black farmers working all their lives to obtain property then by hook and crook having those lands stolen from them for pennies by local authorities?

                  Yes if anyone had a reason to hate it was Ms. Sherrod but she overcame all of that over 24yrs. ago. You want to use a tiny clip to proclaim "racism". A tiny clip that was preceded by the above story of racism against her and one that seemed to say tell your story sister not get "whitey". Did you hear the Amens and applause and reactions when she said God helped her understand through her experiences with the Spooner family(who say she went out of her way to help them save their farm they have to this day)that the issue was not just one of race but of the have and have nots. That racism didn't always exist(remmember her talking about indentured servatude?)but was used to divide people and keep poor blacks and whites from fighting together to improve their lots. How did you ignore the Amens and approval voiced when she lamented that she wished more white people were in the audience and that we must move beyond this issue of race and not let that keep us from working together,black,white,latino,Asian et.al., to improve our our communities our society our nation.

                  She then went on to challenge the young the people in the audience to get education ,to own businesses. She said we came from school and had to go work in the fields ,the young today have no such obligations use that freedom to improve yourselfs and your community she said.

                  We have heard the video doughpoo ,you have heard the racist dog-whistles that Faux,Brietbart and the likes of "Gator" the sheriff use to manipulate and control to divide common folk from seeing the commonality of their struggles. Divide and conquer using the age old "race" card as the means. It always seem to work on you guys.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by KingMax (July 21, 2010 11:06 pm ET)
              11 2
              You're so incredibly misinformed - you must be a Fox News fan. The farmer's family came out in strong support of her because she helped save their farm. Also, this happened long before she was a USDA employe. Switch channels and learn the real story. You know nothing.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by sviolette (July 21, 2010 11:08 pm ET)
              3 1
              Watch the full version of the video. Maybe you can find more in there to lie about. You don't have enough lies to spew yet. Hate is not cool.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by pkcville (July 21, 2010 11:52 pm ET)
              9 1
              Wrong. She had the epiphany in 1986, working at an rural development nonprofit organization, upon encountering the first white farmer that ever came to her seeking help. And she decided that even though she might not feel like helping him based on his race - oh, I don't know, because THE FREAKIN' KLAN MURDERED HER FATHER?!?!?! - that he was worthy and deserving just as much as anybody else.

              I'd say "try to keep up", but it looks like a pretty tall order.

              Oh, and the audience - they were laughing because they recognized that feeling she was describing, of being tempted by the easy path of resenting past mistreatment, but then doing the right thing anyway.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:38 am ET)
                2 9
                The klan murdered her father. That is a horrible thing. Obviously we had evolved since she was a woman with power enough to make or break a struggling farmer. Doesn't make her racism towards a white farmer okay.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:04 pm ET)
                  6 1
                  What racism was shown to the white farmer? She helped them save their farm. She saved their farm.

                  SANCHEZ: In all your time knowing Shirley Sherrod, has there ever been anything about her, either through her attitude, her words, her opinions or behaviors that would lead you to believe that she is in any way a racist?

                  ROGER SPOONER: No way in the world. No way. No way. I don’t even want to talk about it. It don’t make sense. She was just so nice to us as — she didn’t — there wasn’t no — there wasn’t no racism attitude at all in it. Heck no. … They don’t know what they’re talking about. Let me say. They don’t know what they’re talking about, if you want to know my opinion.

                  ELOISE SPOONER: She always treated us really good. She was nice mannered, thoughtful, friendly. Good person.

                  http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/20/sherrod-white-farmers/#comments

                  But even if what you allege was true and it is not. How do you compare that to the institutional racism that was and is being practiced against people of color? It's very telling that despite all the evidence that has come out you and other so-called cons still cling to 45 seconds of a video sharing an incident that happened 24yrs. ago that is part of a 43 min. speech in which the theme was one of redemption and growth and unity. Your story is crumbling all around you yet you still cling to this made-up issue. Pathetic and revealing.

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by pkcville (July 22, 2010 10:29 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Nice. So first, you ignore the rest of my points because they frankly blow away your earlier post.

                  And second, you don't seem to get it: The point is, if anybody ever had a reason to resent white people, Shirley Sherrod did. AND YET, the POINT of her story, was that rising above those feelings of resentment was the right thing to do. It is basically the opposite of racism.

                  She didn't have "power enough to make or break a struggling farmer..." she was, rather, a kind of community organizer (you guys sure love those!) whose only job was trying to help poor farmers - who, what a coincidence, were mostly black - to get adequate legal representation.

                  In the idiotic right-wing version of equality, nobody should ever even feel slightly bad about other races, and the past doesn't exist. In the grown-up version, though, there is an ugly and checkered past that does touch everything that happens today. The fact that Shirley Sherrod - who, as a black woman growing up in the mid-20th century in the rural south, was undoubtedly the object of more ugliness than most - chose to stop and acknowledge her feelings about that past, and then consciously move beyond them, is absolutely heroic. I (a white guy) am not sure I could do it if I were in her shoes.

                  So give it a rest with this "she had power" crap. You guys are wrong on this, just admit it for once.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by jpm3636 (July 21, 2010 2:08 pm ET)
        4 34
        I listen to Limbaugh some time and Fox some time and have never heard a racial comment. The only people trying to bring up racism are the left wingers (like yourself). You people are just trying to divide the country instead of uniting us. Say one thing and do another without regard for anyone. I'm sure you agreed with the NAACP calling the tea party racist even though there is no evidence. You have an agenda where facts and the truth just get in the way!

        I will tell you that I do not support President Obama, not because of his color, but because he doesn't tell the truth about anything! But in your hate spewing mind that will be racism!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:19 pm ET)
          19 1
          LOL! You must be hard of hearing. I'm a conservative and I can tell you that NOTHING you are hearing on Fox/hate talk radio has any semblance to conservatism. Most true conservatives I know have stopped watching Fox and don't listen to these racist jerks any longer. No conservatism.

          Nice parroting of faux conservative talking points, though. Stupid, non-conservative and false, but nice job.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by HairyTBag (July 21, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
            3 22
            You're no conservative. jpm3636 is absolutely right. Where was the moral outrage when the NAACP was calling the Tea Party racist? Please, just see if you can answer the question.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pikaomega (July 21, 2010 8:43 pm ET)
              7 1
              Um, the NAACP did not call the tea party racist. They called upon the non-racists to repudiate the extremist elements in the group. Then, Mark Williams released his bigoted little screed, got called on it and was denounced by the tea party "leadership," to what extent there can be an identifiable leadership for such a decentralized movement.

              So, to recap:

              -NAACP passes resolution saying that the tea party, which they did not label as racist, needs to call out the racist elements within the ranks,

              -Mark Williams demonstrates exactly the racism that the NAACP was referring to,

              -The larger tea party movement moves swiftly to denounce Mark Williams and the sentiments he expressed in his "Letter to Mr. Lincoln."

              Complain all you'd like, but the above sequence of events demonstrates that the NAACP was right on, and that the tea party leadership did the right thing-that just so happened to vindicate the NAACP resolution.

              Cheers.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by DocRock (July 22, 2010 1:00 am ET)
              6 3
              "Where was the moral outrage when the NAACP was calling the Tea Party racist? Please, just see if you can answer the question. "

              Why in the world would there be ANY "moral outrage' for such a clearly truthful statement? The NAACP NEVER CALLED THE TEA PARTY RACIST.

              They said that there are "elements" of KNOWN white supremacists and racists Groups that have infiltrated the Tea Party ( a fact), and that without those elements being expelled and called out for that racism, then the Tea Party was/is in danger of becoming merely a fringe Party that Independents and the center of America would recoil from.

              How could ANY Non Racist person or Group not HAPPILY condemn the Racists discovered in their midst.


              C'mon Tea Party people...expose and throw out the racist elements amongst you, and you'll get more votes than if you don't....guaranteed! It's a win-win for the Tea Party!

              I'll believe that the Tea Party is something more than basically a predominately white, mostly male, rural Party, with a somewhat racist bent, when you start seeing the idiots with the racist signs and those giving similar speeches start getting their signs torn up and them escorted out and told not to return, instead of being silently condoned as they have been so far.

              That'd be a good first start.

              Otherwise, they won't exist in any measure by 2012.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jhonster (July 22, 2010 5:32 am ET)
              5 1
              And the NAACP rightly did so, or didn't you hear the news of The National Tea Party Federation kicking out Tea Party Express after it refused to publicly reprimand spokesman and radio host Mark Williams over racists remarks on July 19th.

              Williams issued a “letter” on his blog, addressed to President Lincoln from colored people and extolling the virtues of slavery. Williams insists that the letter was satirical and has removed it in the face of public backlash. Neither he nor his organization, the Tea Party Express, have issued any apology.

              While Williams claims the blog post was satirical, it is hardly the first racist comment made by the radio personality. He also claimed that Muslims worship a monkey god, and that Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, is a “Jewish Uncle Tom who would have turned rat on Anne Frank.”
              Report Abuse
          • Author by jerry185 (July 21, 2010 5:57 pm ET)
            3 18
            You're not a Conservative when you take that position. jpm3636 said it right. Racism comes from the leftists. Anyone who disagrees with this regime's policies is automatically labeled a racist. It's time you people get your heads out of the sand and stand up for America instead of fabricating ways to bring it down I bet you can't even define what a Conservative is nor what Conservatives believe in.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (July 21, 2010 8:33 pm ET)
              8 1
              There are a number of conservatives here on a daily basis. But go ahead tell us what a conservative is and what they believe in from your point of view.

              For the person above you. The NAACP did not label the teaparty as rascist. They said it contained rascists. There's penty of evidence to support this call.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jerry185 (July 21, 2010 10:40 pm ET)
                1 2
                And that "evidence" is?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by eweston8542983 (July 22, 2010 2:45 pm ET)
                  2 2
                  Well goggling teaparty racism returns 2 million plus links. Mind you some links refute the call. This is from Salon, from one not eager to make that call either.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (July 21, 2010 10:11 pm ET)
              5 1
              I see it's Troll MMfA Day again at the First Bahble-Beatin' Baptist Whitey Church. Get back into your white hoods and get the hell off this site--and out of my country...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:48 am ET)
                2 3
                Of course, that's not racist, right?

                Sorry, it's my country too. Can't we all just get along?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:12 pm ET)
                    1
                  Yes if Shirley Sherrod can rise above what was done to her we should be able to also. That is the lesson of her story.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by jerry185 (July 21, 2010 11:22 pm ET)
              3 3
              From my point of view, a Conservative is one who is a patriot who loves this country and will do whatever is necessary to protect and defend the Constitution. He/she also has a moral conviction that holds life sacrosanct - both the unborn and the elderly. That life. liberty and the pursuit of happiness are endowed as sentient beings, not given to us by the government. a Conservative believes in fiscal responsibility, low taxes,a small government, the free market system, self determination, self responsibility, and a strict Constituionalist.
              All this, of course, is not exclusive to Conservatives.
              So, there it is. I'm sure others can add to it
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:08 pm ET)
                4 2
                Todays so-called conservastives do not resemble what you wrote.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by wanderwoman (July 21, 2010 10:34 pm ET)
            5 1
            Apparently you can't be a conservative if you disagree with the party line, bintx. at least, that's what some other posters say.

            I think it would be nice if you could have your own opinion and still be a conservative. I think that used to be ok among conservatives, to think for yourself. I certainly support your right to do so.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:50 am ET)
              3 5
              Sorry, but I have seen far too many of bintx's posts to believe that he is a conservative, no matter how much he claims to be.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:50 am ET)
                1 3
                and let me add, that it has nothing to do with the party.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
                  4 1
                  Today Ronald Reagan wouldn't be considered a conservative by the right-wing fringe.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by fivenineteen (July 21, 2010 10:54 pm ET)
            2 1
            I've been in a bank "some time" and I've never seen a bank robbery. Folks, bank robberies just don't happen. You people have an agenda where facts and the truth just get in the way. My advice, ignore them and let us unlettered true Americans fix up this country which is really ours and none of yours.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by flippypog (July 21, 2010 6:11 pm ET)
          6 1
          You obviously only tune in when there isn't anything racist said, which must means you only watch Fox once in a blue moon since all they do is spew racism. As for the Tea Party, you're partially correct: the Tea Party concept isn't racism in and of itself, but a vast majority of their participants are without a doubt racist and have proved it about as many times as Fox has.

          Quite frankly, it's time for the FCC to come down on Fox and maybe even remove it from the airwaves or at least force it to go pay-per-view so the rich racists can still watch. Should have revived the Fairness Doctrine a LONG time ago.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rudetude (July 21, 2010 8:55 pm ET)
            1 3
            "Quite frankly, it's time for the FCC to come down on Fox and maybe even remove it from the airwaves or at least force it to go pay-per-view so the rich racists can still watch. Should have revived the Fairness Doctrine a LONG time ago."

            So much for freedom of the press and freedom of expression. If you don't like Fox News don't watch it!!!! Clearly a large population is tuned in as per the ratings. I'm just sayin'.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by jerry185 (July 21, 2010 10:43 pm ET)
            2 4
            Sounds like censorship and anti 1st amendment Just exactly what your lord Soros has in his agenda
            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (July 22, 2010 2:51 pm ET)
              5 1
              Like what happened to:
              Helen Thomas
              David Weigal
              Eason Jordan
              Peter Arnett
              Asheleigh Benfield
              Phil Donahue

              Like that kind of censorship?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by einreb (July 21, 2010 9:00 pm ET)
          6 2
          "I listen to Limbaugh some time and Fox some time and have never heard a racial comment."

          Limbaugh makes a half dozen racist or bigoted comments daily. As an experiment, put yourself in the shoes of somebody Limbaugh is talking about. If his comments bother you . . . well, you get the idea.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:52 am ET)
            1 2
            That's a big claim, can you back that up with evidence?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:24 pm ET)
              3 1
              It really takes a special kind of Chutzpah to come on a site that is loaded with examples of Limbaugh and other conservastives race-baiting and ask for proof of racism. LOL. Dang thats like shooting fish in a barrel. Very telling you see racism in a snipet from a speech from a black person but ask for proof when it's a white person. To you and other cons of today it seems the racism that exist today is from Afro-Americans. Says a lot.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by chrisjones49 (July 21, 2010 11:11 pm ET)
          3 1
          jpm3636..The NAACP did not label the teaparty as rascist. They said it contained rascists. There's plenty of evidence to support this call,look it up.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pkcville (July 22, 2010 12:06 am ET)
          2  
          The NAACP didn't "call the tea party racist"... rather, they called on the tea party leaders to publicly repudiate racists within their midst. Do you understand the distinction, or should somebody draw you a picture?

          Is there any evidence that there are racists in the tea party? Well, just off the top of my head: There's a poster that shows up at tea party rallies showing Obama as a tribal bushman with a bone through his nose. (Do a quick Google search and you'll see plenty of photos.) Do tell, what is the sober, intelligent public policy position being advanced by that one?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 11:59 am ET)
            1 2
            Photoshop does wonders. Have any video? That would be better.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by DocRock (July 22, 2010 1:13 am ET)
          3  
          "The only people trying to bring up racism are the left wingers (like yourself)."

          Think about what you wrote there. See, you are doing exactly what you say they are doing to you.

          "You people are just trying to divide the country instead of uniting us."

          Seems that with your post there, that you are doing an equally good job in that area.


          Way to try to win others over to your way of thinking! You lost my vote by your third sentence.

          And you say it's the Left doing all the bad.....

          *snort*.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by spooky3 (July 21, 2010 11:54 pm ET)
        2 1
        Doesn't she have their number? She's right in every word she said in the story above, and I don't think most of us would have had all the insights she did. Go Ms. Sherrod - but take care of yourself first. You owe the rest of us nothing.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 21, 2010 1:47 pm ET)
      4 27
      It's funny that when this all started to happen, she blamed the USDA and the WH. Now she's blaming Fox and the tea party groups? It's Breitbart and Fox's fault that the USDA jumped the gun and forced to woman to resign over the phone, even before they received all the facts? Or that the NAACP decided to spout off without knowing the whole story? If Fox and Breitbart were the hack information sources as most from the left claim them to be, why did anybody pay attention to it anyway?

      Thing is, if she hadn't said anything in the first place, or had ever been guilty of racism, this would have never happened.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wanderwoman (July 21, 2010 2:03 pm ET)
        24  
        Ha! I see what you did there. Blamed everybody except the perpetrators of this nonsense. You even blamed the victim.

        Can you explain exactly why you think Breitbart and Fox should not be held responsible for disseminating false information?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by sirdouglas5 (July 21, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
          8 1
          Breitbart and Fox are despicable and should be held accountable. That said, I'm terribly disappointed in the Obama administration's actions. I find it hard to believe they weren't any smarter than to be snookered by Fox and its hateful devotees.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 21, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
          1 22
          The info that they put out was not false, it was video of a speech that she had made.

          Blame the victim? She admitted herself that she had racist tendencies, but I believe that firing her was just plain stupid. Why wasn't it investigated during the time frame that she was speaking of?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by didi (July 21, 2010 3:10 pm ET)
            17 1
            It was false.... the speech was highly edited to leave out the part where she explained the LEARNING moment.

            Learning.... something I can see you're not interested in.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
              12 2
              didi, doughie has been jonesing for a racist to defend for a couple of days. That's this particular faux conservative troll's M.O. He's ALL about defending white racists like Rush and the race-baiters on Fox. See, doughie doesn't believe that white folks are EVER racist. He seems to think that the racist gene is more prevalent in the DARKER-skinned people of the world.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:20 pm ET)
                3 5
                Sometimes your ignorance astounds me, but then I remember who you work for.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:18 pm ET)
                  5 2
                  doughpoo as many times you've had your ignorant post busted down you got nerve talking about being astounded. Whats astounding is you dare to continue to post such obvious BS and cling to debunked lies. Thats takes a special arrogance wallowing in and celebrating ignorance and prejudice.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by DAWNfromMISSOURI (July 21, 2010 9:50 pm ET)
              2 1
              Excellent Reply didi !
              Report Abuse
            • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:21 pm ET)
              1 2
              Oh my, you found me out.

              Actually, there was no edit.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (July 21, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
            14 1
            The info that they put out was not false, it was video of a speech that she had made.

            It was PART of the speech, not the ENTIRE speech!

            She admitted herself that she had racist tendencies, but I believe that firing her was just plain stupid. Why wasn't it investigated during the time frame that she was speaking of?

            She admitted that she grew up in the South back when Black folks didn't have a voice and didn't speak up, that her father was killed by a White man. And her experiences caused her to not trust most White folks and not to accept White folks treating as less than.

            She also admitted that she was wrong on her thinking. That people were people and the real differences were between those who have nothing and those who have it all.

            Her dealing with the White farmers was 26 years ago and she did not work for the USDA!!!! So she didn't need investigating because she helped White farmers not hurt them!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DAWNfromMISSOURI (July 21, 2010 9:53 pm ET)
              2 1
              Thank you ! Well put ! :)
              Report Abuse
            • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:25 pm ET)
              1 2
              It was PART of the speech, not the ENTIRE speech!


              Then the idiots who fired her should have watched the video of the whole speech. Or maybe they did...Why call her while she's driving, make her pull over to the side of the road and make her resign immediately?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:31 pm ET)
                3 1
                Thats why she was offered her job back doughpoo. After watching the whole video it became clear that what Faux and Brietbart were fostering on the public were lies and distorions. Why do you still cling to them?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by wanderwoman (July 21, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
            16 1
            It certainly was false, did you even watch the video? There was written commentary added and it stated flat out that she had discriminated while holding her federal position. That was a lie. On top of that, there was the dishonest editing of the speech.

            She is definitely a victim of Breitbart and Fox's lies.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wanderwoman (July 21, 2010 4:43 pm ET)
            9 1
            The video is here. Maybe you should inform yourself before you spew more nonsense.

            And don't be fooled by the gray box with the extra commentary. Those of us who bothered to become educated before commenting know that those comments have been added since Breitbart made an ass of himself by posting the video in the first place.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (July 21, 2010 10:14 pm ET)
            3 1
            Highly edited video from Andrew The Professional Liar Breitbart. And you, of course, eat it all up, Mr. Grand Dragon...
            Report Abuse
      • Author by DGV (July 21, 2010 2:12 pm ET)
        12  
        Unbelievable. She should be mad at the people who fired her. She should also be mad at the person who lied about her and the people who spread the lie. Say it with me, "Lie".

        Let's photoshop a picture of you holding a racist sign at a tea party rally, throw it up on MSNBC for 24 hours nonstop, get you fired from your job and then write about it on websites.

        "Well if he wasn't at that rally this never would have happened right?"

        At long last sir...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AC_Mem (July 21, 2010 10:22 pm ET)
          2  
          Awesome post DGV. Spot on.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:28 pm ET)
          1 4
          So you admit that the signs could be photoshopped?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DGV (July 23, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
            3  
            Sure they could all be photoshopped, I didn't take the pictures so I can't testify to their authenticity.

            Are you saying there are photoshopped pictures? If you find fakes I will stand with you in denouncing the people who perpetrated the forgery, fraud and slander.

            Will you stand with me denouncing Breitbart?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by didi (July 21, 2010 2:27 pm ET)
        14 1
        Beats me why ANYONE would believe anything Faux puts out.

        My reaction would be PROVE IT. Short of an unbiased source I'd immediately ignore the report.

        Nevertheless, Faux bears the ultimate responsibility for the report. as a "news" organization they are expected to have a modicum of respect for the truth. They have shown time and again they have no such respect.

        The USDA and the NAACP showed very bad judgment for believing the report and the people involved should be reprimanded.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jerry185 (July 21, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
        2 6
        It seems the NAACP and the USDA acted"stupidly" Both showed the good moral sense to retract and make amends.
        Stop lying MM and get your facts straight.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:34 pm ET)
          2 1
          After viewing the whole tapes. Why do you still defend what is now being accepted by everyone who is not a radical right-wing kook that Brietbart and Faux were passing on lies and distortions?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by hootie (July 21, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
        16
      if you would look at the timeline fox aired the story after she got the the calls.and msnbc,cnn.. like they don't make mistakes oh thats right the liberals never make mistakes. the ones she should be mad at is the white house and usda,naacp for not checking the fax also. theres more people to blame then just fox news and Andrew Breitbart.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:20 pm ET)
        11 4
        Actually, no. But for Breitbart and Fox pushing this phony, cropped and edited video . . . NONE OF WHAT HAPPENED WOULD HAVE HAPPENED.

        BTW, this has nothing to do with "liberals" or "conservatives," hootie. Nothing on Fox/hate talk radio has a single thing to do with conservatism. NOTHING.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by onementalgiant (July 22, 2010 5:44 pm ET)
            2
          Why do you insist on considering yourself to be a "conservative" bintx? Are you ashamed of being a liberal? Just wondering.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (July 23, 2010 2:42 pm ET)
            2  
            Perhaps you don't really have a good definition for conservative. As said earlier, Ronald Reagan wouldn't be considered conservative by the current crowd. Neither would Ike or Goldwater, or Nixon.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bellasita (July 21, 2010 9:45 pm ET)
        3  
        Real news reporters check the source. They could've found the uedited tape as fast as I did.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by UnoMcfly (July 21, 2010 11:47 pm ET)
        2  
        In fairness to Msnbc and Cnn...By the time those NEWS companies ran the story the USDA had already moved for her resignation. And CNN pretty much OWNED this story they had all the facts Rick Sanchez is still smiling that little smug smile he does... Unfortunately that statue John King had Darkheart on first and just let him babble on.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:31 pm ET)
        1 4
        I find it very interesting that hootie gets bashed for pointing out that Fox aired the story after she got the calls, and thus had nothing to do with her getting fired.

        By the way, she was initially mad at the WH and the USDA when she first appeared on CNN. I am sure that video can be found very easily.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
          3 1
          Thats what you wanted to hear dougpoo. She blamed the USDA and the whitehouse for succumbing to the lies of Brietbart and the tea-party. Yes the interview is over on CNN go find it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by armendale (July 21, 2010 3:03 pm ET)
      13 2
      How dare this Sharrod woman unfairly victimize FAUX NEWS with her accusations of journalistic injustice when all FOX did was to fail to meet the most basic journalistic standards, report a phoney story, slander her name and reputation while stoking up white racist outrage.
      HOW DARE MS SHARROD!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by YankeeFromVA (July 21, 2010 9:11 pm ET)
        2 3
        And the deification of Ms. Sharrod continues...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:03 am ET)
        4 8
        bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

        A liberal is upset about journalistic standards?

        Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaa!

        The left OWNS slander. CBS re: George Bush false paperwork. Other network re: false car safety tests. Olbermann's baseless trip every night (isn;t he supposed to be on vacation crying about being owned by Tucker Carlson anyway)? Tawana Brawley/Al Sharpton. New Black Panthers calling for the murder of "crackers and their babies." Obama repeatedly changing his positions yet getting no coverage. Of course, there is the still umnproven claim of tea party racism or the n word being shouted at congressmen. But you dont care about the truth anyway.

        I could go on for days... but the lemmings here are still enamored by the great uniter.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:05 am ET)
          3 6
          I mean c'mon. EVEN IF we somehow rationalize that Sherrard is not a racist, this is example numbner what of a liberal falsely being called a racist?

          How does that shoe feel on the other foot now, libs? Are you capable of learning from this? Perhaps this could be the teachable moment that brings the parties closer together? I doubt it. Instead of realizing that false accusations are a bad thing, this whole mess will just get libs all wee-wee'd up to dig deeper into the Alinsky handbook and find more evil ways to screw conservatives and destroy America.

          Take the high road if you can.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (July 22, 2010 12:56 am ET)
            5 2
            Teachable how, to us evil liberals?
            How do you see us taking our place in your america.
            What levers of authority would you be happy with in liberal hands?
            Your scatter gun approach does little to naught to establish any dialogue.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:42 pm ET)
              2 3
              I will take a liberal over a progressive or communitariast any day. Too bad the liberal party has been taken over by radicals who used to live in communes, wear flowers in their hair, hate the establishment, call the military baby-killers, call the police pigs, burned their brains with acid, pot, and cocaine, and said that you should never trust anybody over the age of 30.

              Great group.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 2:04 pm ET)
                2 1
                Tsk,tsk,tsk...what a nut!!!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (July 22, 2010 2:33 pm ET)
                3 1
                "If you don't answer the question youngman we're going to have to gag you."
                Report Abuse
    • Author by Stayin'Arrive (July 21, 2010 3:11 pm ET)
      1 11
      Who's lying now?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by armendale (July 21, 2010 3:13 pm ET)
      9 3
      Clearly Breitbart and FOX are the victims in all this.
      Their hands are clean.

      I mean, just because Breitbart and FOX have a history of colluding to disseminate false and misleading right-wing propaganda to attack the Obama administration certainly has no bearing on this incident of colluding to disseminate false and misleading right-wing propaganda to attack the Obama administration.

      Right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:06 am ET)
        3 3
        Help me understand your logic armendale. Is the mere act of disagreeing with the president an attack? is it racist?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jdhunt636 (July 21, 2010 3:18 pm ET)
      4 17
      Wow, What a bunch of leftist idiots. I cant even believe how blind you all are. She was told to resign because she would be on Glenn Beck. When in fact Glenn never even ran the story until after she did resign. On top of that, he said that he thinks she should not have to resign due to her words being taken "out of context", which all you crazy progressive liberals do every day. Wake up, people. Media Matters is a false source.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
        11 1
        JDhunt636 . . . I'm a conservative. I take it from your obvious adoration of Glenn Beck that you are not . . . neither is Beck. He's just a dishonest, uneducated con man and you are a blind groupie.

        The persons at fault here are Breitbart and his enablers at Fox. But for Breitbart's cropped and edited video and Fox's pushing of same . . . NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED AT ALL.

        Understand?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by anduknowthiz (July 21, 2010 8:44 pm ET)
          1  
          Thank you, bintx, for remaining calm and articulate despite the fact that some people are becoming verbally abusive in order to divert attention from the facts.

          Furthermore, I agree - if the video was presented in its entirety, this would not even be an issue.

          p.s. I want to validate your comment that you are a conservative. You have said it enough times that even the most thick-skulled person should be able to comprehend it, but....
          Anyway, I am objective enough to realize that it is possible to be a conservative and yet dislike Glen Beck. hehe
          Report Abuse
        • Author by doughpro1604643 (July 22, 2010 12:45 pm ET)
            3
          How do you get "obvious adoration of Glenn Beck.." from what jdhunt said?
          Still trying to convince us that you are a conservative, I see.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by LagalLeft (July 21, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
      8 1
      Mrs. Sherrod. I hope you will consider suing Breitbart and also Fox, especially Fox. Breitbart keeps repeating the same mantra on every interview I've seen concerning this story. He keeps saying that it wasn't ''about you''. Since you are the one who lost your job because of his and Fox's lies, I would love to see you ''make it about him..and Fox news. Maybe they will learn a lesson about race-baiting. America is tired of this kind of shameless behavior in the 21st century. Please consider it. I'd be willing to donate to a fund to help you.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by JohnHerald (July 21, 2010 4:50 pm ET)
          1
        Fox is probably immune. The charge would be libel, which requires both untruthfulness and intent to harm. Fox definitely sought to harm the Obama administration, but reported what it apparently thought was the truth, incredible sloppiness aside. On the one hand, Fox could claim the harm to Ms. Sherrod was inadvertent, and on the other, Ms. Sherrod's position could render her a public figure. And Brreitbart could probably slide on the same grounds. No, the USDA faces the legal heat on this, and if I were a lawyer, I'd love to have the case.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
          2 1
          Well, it depends on whether or not there is a financial connection between Breitbart and Fox, JohnHerald.

          Also, Sherrod's position is that of a salaried employee of the USDA. She would not fit into the category of a public figure. As far as the USDA . . . it will be hard to go after them because of the zero tolerance policy under which she was asked to resign. Her comments regarding her initial inclination to discriminate could have prevented her from ever having gotten the job in the first place . . . doesn't matter the context or the timing. The fact that she fought that urge was admirable and I applaud her for it. I'm angry because this nice woman was trashed without even knowing WHY.

          I'm thinking that Breitbart and any benefactors in this endeavour need to lawyer up . . . NOW.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by spooky3 (July 22, 2010 12:00 am ET)
          1  
          She's not a public figure by the definitions used in past cases. They also acted at the very least with reckless disregard for the truth and how it would affect her. The intention to harm some other person or entity simply is an additional, separate factor. She clearly was damaged by the actions. Looks like a promising case to me and I hope a great team of lawyers will take her case on, pro bono. Of course a big settlement would be offered to her immediately.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:08 am ET)
        3 4
        How about suing the actual people that fired you instead of the people that reported the story? Oh wait.. that would be an example of logic and personal responsibility. Don't forget, the White House supported this action, so lets be sure that she includes BHO in the lawsuit.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Space-Pedestrian (July 21, 2010 4:30 pm ET)
      3 8
      But she's not a victim of a hairtrigger Administration and NAACP? Their tire marks are across her back, too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
        8 4
        No. She is the victim of a smear by Breitbart and Fox. Anything which occurred AFTER that smear is also their fault.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jpeagle21 (July 21, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
          4 5
          But she was not forced to resign AFTER Fox ran the story. Fox didn't run the story until she was already out of a job. I don't know what Breitbart's motive was, but he says it was to show how hypocritical the NAACP is in their accusations of racism in the tea party. If I were him, I would appologize to Sherrod for the fact that his posting of the video got her fired, regardless of the motive. Fox is a whole different story. If fox didn't report it until AFTER she resigned then how it it their fault? Why don't you hold to account the administration official who called her and told her to resign immediately. Why don't you hold to account the NAACP who blasted her before viewing the whole video, which they had access to the whole time?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jpeagle21 (July 21, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
          2 8
          But she was not forced to resign AFTER Fox ran the story. Fox didn't run the story until she was already out of a job. I don't know what Breitbart's motive was, but he says it was to show how hypocritical the NAACP is in their accusations of racism in the tea party. If I were him, I would appologize to Sherrod for the fact that his posting of the video got her fired, regardless of the motive. Fox is a whole different story. If fox didn't report it until AFTER she resigned then how it it their fault? Why don't you hold to account the administration official who called her and told her to resign immediately. Why don't you hold to account the NAACP who blasted her before viewing the whole video, which they had access to the whole time?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jpeagle21 (July 21, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
          2 7
          But she was not forced to resign AFTER Fox ran the story. Fox didn't run the story until she was already out of a job. I don't know what Breitbart's motive was, but he says it was to show how hypocritical the NAACP is in their accusations of racism in the tea party. If I were him, I would appologize to Sherrod for the fact that his posting of the video got her fired, regardless of the motive. Fox is a whole different story. If fox didn't report it until AFTER she resigned then how it it their fault? Why don't you hold to account the administration official who called her and told her to resign immediately. Why don't you hold to account the NAACP who blasted her before viewing the whole video, which they had access to the whole time?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (July 21, 2010 7:49 pm ET)
        5 1
        There was nothing "hairtrigger" about Breitbart and Fox's actions. They victoriously put another black person out of a job. They knew exactly what they were doing.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by UnoMcfly (July 21, 2010 11:59 pm ET)
        1 1
        To that question, I'll just ask this...If given like everyone is saying right now... that the initial 2min tape was all that was floating around...Upon seeing that tape with ( in its chopped up form) is quite damning. And the Administration automatically says No its not racism because look who said it breitbart. And the Naacp comes out and automatically says No it cant be racism, the Right wing hack Breitbart said it. What would the Right's reaction been?? Something along the lines of Black President Racial Bias?? probably not they dont do that right
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheetosareus (July 21, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
      3 12
      None of you watched Beck yesterday. You should have seen what he did. I couldn't believe it. He actually defended Shirley Sherrod saying the clip that was being shown all around was too short and didn't offer any context. Then he said it was not fair because what Shirley said could have been taken out of context. Of course he whined about his statements being taken out of context and he refused to do that to her. I guess she didn't watch him either if she thinks he was "biased and racist". I didn't know the WH was so afraid of Glenn Beck that they threw Shirley under the bus without waiting to see what Beck would do. As it turns out, Breitbart did play enought of the tape so everyone could see she changed her attitude. I think the real issue was the people at the NAACP dinner were laughing and cheering when they thought she was bragging about how she had stuck it to the white farmer. Revealing her epiphany she says it is not about "white and black, but yes it is"; and goes on, it's about helping poor people. "It's all about the money." I don't expect Shirley or Media Matters to be as fair to Beck as he was to her. Watch him today. You might learn something. I did.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wanderwoman (July 21, 2010 5:23 pm ET)
        13 2
        You learned the wrong thing.

        I saw that clip from Beck, it's here on Media Matters. I wasn't surprised that he said what he said, because it was a perfect opportunity to paint the Obama administration as the bad guys, which is his MO every time he's on the air.

        I didn't hear what you heard on that tape. Whoever sent it to Breitbart left out the part just before, where she stated what she stated what she was leading up to, which was that it was about poor people and not about color. Then, there was commentary inserted that stated clearly that she admitting to doing this in her position with the FDA, which was a false statement. I heard absolutely no cheering in that video, what I heard was some laughter after she made the statement that while the farmer was acting superior to her, she was trying to decide how much help she would give him. She then goes on to give more context for that. When she said that she did do as much for him as she could, I didn't hear any response from the audience.

        If you watch Beck regularly, then you must be aware of the delusional stuff he says everyday about this administration. I think they were too quick in their response to this, and I think it was because they were certain that Beck would use the incident to slam them again. And he did. And I believe that if they hadn't fired. her, he would have gone a different direction to use this incident to slam them, though I admit that's speculation on my part.

        He is now being so "fair" to Sherrod, that he is pretty much accusing her of being a Communist. With friends like that, who needs enemies?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wanderwoman (July 21, 2010 5:25 pm ET)
          4  
          Arghh, I wish we could correct posts. Sorry for the hiccups, and in the end of the third paragraph it should read "...she said that she didn't do as much for him as she could."
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jerry185 (July 21, 2010 6:28 pm ET)
          2 10
          This Administration(Regime) deserves to be "slammed" Their Marxist policies are indefensible and inexcusable.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (July 21, 2010 7:56 pm ET)
            4  
            You don't know what Marxism is. (I sense a copy and paste from Wikipedia coming)
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (July 21, 2010 10:19 pm ET)
            1 2
            Reported as off-topic troll...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:11 am ET)
              3 3
              You must be confusing this place with the DailyKOS. KOS is the site that removes commenting privileges from members for merely disagreeing, no matter how polite the disagreement is.

              MM has repeatedly taken the side of free speech and allows multiple viewpoints, which makes for a much better online experience.

              Reporting trolls is like being a whiny playground tattle tale. Back your stuff up with facts or shut the heck up. Man up, use your brain, take on those you disagree with.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (July 22, 2010 1:02 am ET)
                  2
                Putting out nearly a dozen posts. Most of them end to end talking points. After the conversation has moved on is not how you engage people.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by HoodwinkedNot (July 22, 2010 9:51 pm ET)
          1  
          "He is now being so "fair" to Sherrod, that he is pretty much accusing her of being a Communist." OMG....how did you come up with that? When someone is "pretty much doing something", that means they are not doing it. By being so "fair" it causes accusations of Communism? That is very odd indeed.

          It sounds like you are a regular Beck watcher, since you are aware of delusional stuff he says everyday about this administration. I am not a regular Beckhead, but did watch when Martin Luther King's neice, Dr. Alveda King, was on and that was interesting.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (July 21, 2010 7:55 pm ET)
        6  
        "[Beck] actually defended Shirley Sherrod"
        And then what did he say?

        Beck suggests Sherrod should've been made a "czar" because "she fits in with all you Maoists"

        Beck: Sherrod "obviously has some sort of Marxist or redistributionist qualities to her"

        Yeah, it really looks like Becky has come to Sherrod's rescue.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by twilson117 (July 21, 2010 4:59 pm ET)
      3  
      Fox has already laid the ground work to deny what they did. If any of you can play O’Reilly opening from yesterday’s show you will see how he has position this story in such a way it can be touted as an indictment on MSM for not covering these types of stories. Don’t forget Brietbart is their source for the ACRON tapes.

      I once thought they provided a reasonable view of the news, but once they hired Beck, and let Hannity have unfettered run after dumping Colmes that was it for me.

      The question is, where does Sherrod go to get her reputation back?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jpeagle21 (July 21, 2010 5:29 pm ET)
      4 11
      <she said of Fox. "I am just a pawn. I was just here. They are after a bigger thing, they would love to take us back to where we were many years ago. Back to where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person."
      "I think it is race. You think we have come a long way in terms of race relations in this country, but we keep going backwards," she said. "We have become more racist. This was their doing, Breitbart put that together misrepresenting what I was saying and Fox carried it."> -Ms. Sherrod

      I actually felt bad for this woman until now. Fox didn't report on this until AFTER she was forced to resign by the Obama administration and was slammed by the NAACP (who had the full copy of the video the whole time). Now, all of a sudden, Fox is a racist news organization that "would love to take us back to where we were many years ago. Back to where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person."?

      Did she REALLY learn anything in the past 24 years? She sounds like the type of person who automatically believes that if a white person does her wrong, it MUST be because she is black and for no other reason. If a news channel reports something bad about the black president, it MUST be because he is black. Hmmmmm, let me think about this a minute...........yep, thats called playing the race card.

      She is the one that ADMITTED being racist (in 1986 - not exactly the height of the civil rights movement) and it doesn't sound like she learned anything in the past 24 years. Am I supposed to be overjoyed because she found it in her heart to help a white farmer? THAT WAS HER JOB! She seems no different than small-minded white people who are nice to black folks to their face, but are the first to put their house on the market when one of them moves into the neighborhood.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 21, 2010 5:51 pm ET)
        7 3
        Nope, Fox is SAYING that they didn't report on it until after she was asked to resign, but that's not true.

        None of this would have happened but for the cropped and edited video posted by Breitbart and pushed by Fox. Everything which occurred following that was their fault. It's called "causation." Breitbart and Fox OWN IT, you racist jerk.


        Nice try attempting to place the blame on the victim . . . you fail.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jpeagle21 (July 21, 2010 10:31 pm ET)
          3 3
          When all else fails and you want to derail the argument, call'em a racist. Do you work for the NAACP? You both seem to have the same philosophy.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:48 pm ET)
            1 1
            Yes thats what Faux and Brietbart do, blow the racist dog-whistles and you jump like Pavlov described. You are so cracked and fringed you believe the NAACP is racist.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Bill from Dover (July 21, 2010 6:07 pm ET)
        8 3
        "Now, all of a sudden, Fox is a racist news organization"
        Wrong... Fox has ALWAYS been a racist news organization.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:14 am ET)
          3 3
          Proof please.

          I disagree with Barack Obama because he s 100% liberal, not because he is 50% black. Like the Tea Parties, disagreeing with Obama is NOT about race. To read the pages here makes one think that any disagreement with the president is based on racism when it is not.

          So again, proof of Fox racism please.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWNfromMISSOURI (July 21, 2010 10:23 pm ET)
        1 1
        Did you know that when she was a child, her father was murdered by a white man? She had to overcome a lot and DID! This woman is someone I never knew existed, but now I am proud of her and I look up to her ! I will, as a 50+ year old white female, continue to fight the injustice of bigots and racists. Way to go Ms. Sherrod!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jpeagle21 (July 22, 2010 9:34 pm ET)
            1
          Lots of white people are murdered by black people every day. Lots of black people are murdered by white people every day. You act like the fact that her father was murdered by a white man gives her some justification to be racist against all white people. Am I supposed to be proud of this woman because she doesn't hate a whole race of people because one of them killed her father?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by HairyTBag (July 21, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
      3 7
      I think the Bush Administration is responsible for this - somehow. Don't really know how, but they are at fault for absolutely every problem the U.S. and I have ever had since I was born 49 years ago.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (July 21, 2010 9:25 pm ET)
        1 1
        No only the problems that it caused directly or indirectly. Many of the problems today stem from Reagan and prior Presidents from both sides of the isle.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by UnoMcfly (July 22, 2010 12:13 am ET)
        1 1
        Look...GWB was @ the Helm for 9/11 the iraq Wmd debacle...the Medicare prescription D, the "bush Tax cuts" the "bush Doctrine"...Homeland security which @ best has been a overblown redundant ( with all due defference to the men and women who work there) agency. Didnt pay for either war, was a general embarrasment to a very large swath of the american public. So last 50 years maybe not all the problems...The last 10 and the next 40...Probably.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by joedla1117 (July 21, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
      4 2
      The Fox news political satirists along with a have dozen right wing groups have been pulling the same crap on almost everything they do. Partial blogs and videos that alter the meaning, messages that have been modified like the statement from Lee Iacocca where they substitute Obama in place of Bush and substitute Democrat in place of republican and E-mail it to thousands of people, telling them to forward it to every body else.
      I have seen several hundred of these abortions, and found absolute proof of what they have done to alter the meanings. This time they have definitely crossed the line. This should easily end up as a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Fox news and those involved. I wonder if Fieger might be interested in this one. Hit them where it hurts (in the pocket book).
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bill from Dover (July 21, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
        4 3
        Hey, they set up Acorn and took them down. Why stop when yer on a roll?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:23 am ET)
          2 3
          Really? Did Fox provide help to a pimp and underage prostitute? Did Fox illegally register voters, or is Fox involved in lawsuits on 10+ states for corruption? ACORN made its own bed, reporting the story doesn't make Fox the cause of the problem.

          Do you blame your keyboard for your typos?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:23 am ET)
          2 2
          Really? Did Fox provide help to a pimp and underage prostitute? Did Fox illegally register voters, or is Fox involved in lawsuits on 10+ states for corruption? ACORN made its own bed, reporting the story doesn't make Fox the cause of the problem.

          Do you blame your keyboard for your typos?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 1:50 pm ET)
               
            Hahaha...what a kook! You fall for Glenn Beck pretending to be a professor. lol.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:18 am ET)
        2 3
        Hmm.. was it fox that cropped a photograph of a black man carrying a gun to a presidential rally? Nope.

        Was it fox that photoshopped weapons out of the hands of the "victims" on the "peace ship" to Gaza? Nope.

        Was it Fox News that accused Duke lacrosse players of rape? Nope.

        Was it Fox News that falsified paperwork about President Bush? Nope.

        Was it Fox News that feigned anger over a hitler reference to Obama when that very same news reporter had no such anger when the target was GWB?

        Get the point? You can only see of you open your eyes. And by the way, Glenn Becks shows that feature prominent black historians and their role in American history is some of the best news coverage on television. I'm guessing not many readers here saw those episodes.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dewdrop_8171931 (July 21, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
      6 3
      FAUX News is really trying to start a serious race war in this country between whites and the 'others' (gays, lesbians, hispanics abd blacks) lately. Unfortunately, people are buying it hook line and sinker! Why are people so dense?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (July 22, 2010 12:21 am ET)
        3 3
        Evidence please. The only people trying to start race wars are the ignorant people that feel empowered because a black president has been elected.

        Oh wait, there's also that Michelle Obama "barack could get shot while pumping gas" comment made on 60 minutes (although she didn't stretch the discussion to cover what race the shooter probably would have been).

        The Obama's have failed miserably to take advantage of an amazing teaching point. They could have used their success to preach to all of America that you can do anything here, no matter what color you are. But instead, the Obama's regularly play the race card as it suits them. THEY are helping to divide America, Fox News reporting on these divisive tactics is NOT the problem.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 2:01 pm ET)
          2 2
          You right-wing Becktoid come back to reality. Your're a liar.

          This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.


          This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

          The whole speech is here

          www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/18/obama-race-speech-r
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dewdrop_8171931 (July 21, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
      4 2
      FAUX News is really trying to start a serious race war in this country between whites and the 'others' (gays, lesbians, hispanics abd blacks) lately. Unfortunately, people are buying it hook line and sinker! Why are people so dense?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dewdrop_8171931 (July 21, 2010 6:10 pm ET)
      2 2
      FAUX News is really trying to start a serious race war in this country between whites and the 'others' (gays, lesbians, hispanics abd blacks) lately. Unfortunately, people are buying it hook line and sinker! Why are people so dense?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by labman57 (July 21, 2010 6:27 pm ET)
      5 2
      Several networks reported the original story, but FOX News -- henceforth known as FOX PAC (they are, after all, little more than a political action committee -- went a step further and actively and repeatedly called for her immediate dismissal. The bozos at FOX are not content to merely report the news, they feel compelled to create news by injecting themselves into the story.

      They may not have directly caused her forced resignation, but they are definitely guilty of actively campaigning for this outcome without doing the basic investigative groundwork. Time for them to step up to the plate and spend as much time divulging the true story as they did trying to destroy Sherrod's career, acknowledging their culpability in the spread of harmful disinformation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zzeltar (July 21, 2010 6:44 pm ET)
      6 2
      Ms Sherrod, I am sorry you went through this but I am proud of you. You have stood strong before what is wrong and you have dignity and courage! We must all stand up to these lies and change our country!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWNfromMISSOURI (July 21, 2010 10:31 pm ET)
        1 1
        Beautifully written, I look forward to my replies being shown. I am a "newbee" and they have to be sure I am not saying awful stuff. I like that! I use to read a lot on Huff Post, but the right-wing posters really depress me. I think I found a new home here at Media-Matters! :)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jaylast (July 21, 2010 7:42 pm ET)
      2 4
      One needs to look at the Obama administration for throwing its people under the bus as soon as there is any controversy--real or falsely created. The knee-jerk reaction to distance oneself without knowing the full story is not only pathetic but now pathological.

      I hope all those who predicted that Obama is a self-aggrandizing user who lacked experience and maturity are not proven correct despite the disturbing evidence mounting.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thucy (July 21, 2010 7:59 pm ET)
        5  
        One also needs to look at the alleged "news organization" that is so eager to spread vicious lies and allegations about an innocent individual without making any attempt whatsoever to ascertain the true facts of the story.

        The Obama administration and the NAACP have both apologized. The Secretary of Agriculture has also offered to reinstate her or offer her another job.

        When can we expect Fox "News" to apologize for getting this so wrong?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by GreenLantern (July 21, 2010 8:33 pm ET)
      4 2
      faux and the hate-wing have scored another success. Long after this story has dwindled there will still be a substantial people claiming that she really is racist at faux and the hate-wing radio was right.
      I still have people at my job telling me that "Madam" Pelosi demanded a luxury liner to ferry her, her family and all her gay friends back and forth to San Francisco. Facts and proof really mean ZERO to them!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by louis r (July 21, 2010 9:24 pm ET)
      2 1
      FINALLY, I see a number of you "liberals," (educated folks) FIGHTING (verbally), these racists loons that sometimes (more than I would like to admit), FLOOD these sites with hatred, downright racism and fear.

      FINALLY, NORMAL FOLKS are "standing up:" to these nuts!! Keep up the good work people. Maybe WE can "quiet" some of this trash talk down by responding to the comments of obviously uneducated buffoons.

      Don't let ANY of the "haters," get away with their filthy diatribe.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by texasvietvet (July 21, 2010 9:48 pm ET)
      1 1
      I hope a few good lawyers decide to team up and help Ms. Sherrod.
      Sue Fox Noise and Andrew Ain't-so-bright bart. The latter can't afford it, so go after him first and destroy his wingnut job "business" of lying for the conservanazis.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jakeobox (July 21, 2010 10:20 pm ET)
      1 1
      If she decides to sue FOX I'll pay for it!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by labman57 (July 21, 2010 10:33 pm ET)
         
      Irony. Breitbart and FOX News (including Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, and the bozos on Fox and Friends) invested many hours and much energy portraying Sherrod as a racist and calling for her immediate dismissal.

      White House staffers took heed and, based on the edited video and disingenuous story line submitted by these conservative media entities, Sherrod was forced to resign.

      And now these same media outlets condemn the Obama Administration for jumping the gun based on said widely disseminated disinformation.

      Essentially, Breitbart and FOX PAC (they don't qualify as a news network) are telling their audiences that people should know better than to trust the veracity of any news story being fervently promoted by ... Breitbart or FOX!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The Seeker 48439 (July 21, 2010 11:11 pm ET)
         
      The blame game:

      Fox News:
      1. Failed to research the video further before airing. -Shame on you O'Reilly & Hannity on Monday. (-)
      2. Will likely deny journalistic failure by claiming that the "talking heads" (Hannity & O'Reilly) are "commentators" and not "journalists" despite the fact that both shows air on "FOXNews" channel. (-)
      3. Greta's story tonight 7/21, condemns the White House for the quick firing WITHOUT any real comment on FOX's part to break the story. (-)
      4. Hannity in an attempt to avoid the subject gave little about his own part in airing the story on 7/19. Instead, he just replaced a typical 10 minute "Bash the Dems/WH/Govt." with a fluff piece with an actress in the upcoming "Ramona and Beezus" actress.
      (-)
      5. Props to O'Reilly for his public apology on 7/21. (+)
      White House & USDA:
      1. Failed to do own research on the video before reacting to FOXNews reports. Pulled the trigger too soon. (-)
      2. Currently trying to make amends with public apology (+)

      NAACP:
      1. Failed to do own research on the video before reacting to FOXNews reports. Worried about perception....

      The Media
      1. In general, all too often many organizations fail to do adequate research. In addition to this, facts that run counter to their story or organizational leaning are often omitted.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by UnoMcfly (July 21, 2010 11:51 pm ET)
      1  
      I'm Wondering if anyone saw the Special Comment by Olbermann...or the Maddow Show? The 1st 14 minutes of her show were amazing the eloquence and simplicity with which she explained the tried & true "Be AFRAID of The Black guy" technique is something i would love to see shown on the normal networks... as they seem really incapable of even adressing the question like adults. Just play the intro to maddow and let more americans see.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cann0nba11 (July 21, 2010 11:58 pm ET)
      3 2
      If I was a lesser person I would be laughing at this situation.

      Sherrard is a racist, she can't help it due to the violence and tragedy she suffered. She was a teenager in the 1960s, a time that was horrible for blacks in America. However, this doesn't excuse her comments. Racism is racism. She failed to use the "full power" of her office. She assumed the white farmer was trying to show his "superiority." These are racially motivated statements made by her.

      But for entertainment purposes lets assume that Mrs. Sherrard is not a racist. Therefore, in the mig media game of lies, deception and false accusations I think the score is now something like Left - 576, Right 1.

      Everybody needs to unwad their panties and calm down. I've got two words for you to put this into perspective:

      Tawana Brawley.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 2:13 pm ET)
        3 1
        Tawana Brawley??? Really. Please explain how helping a family save theri farm was racist? Please explain how something that happened 24yrs. ago in which she actually helped the family but learned from that experience is any indication of racism today? Your allegations are irrational and resemble that of a right-wing radical kook and you want the tea-party to be seen as mainstream? Rand Paul,Sharron Angle, Glenn Beck,Michelle Bachmann? LoL.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rdplum (July 22, 2010 12:35 am ET)
        1
      The charge of "Racism/racist" seems to be spreading throu-out the work environment. I was called a racist one year before Sonja Sotomeyer (splg?), our new Supreme Court justice, was called a racist. I was fired a few months later. I had discussed the history of white man's "manifest destiny" toward all he met along the road to control .... I'm white and worked in public education for 27 years.

      Peace
      Report Abuse
    • Author by StewartIII (July 22, 2010 12:37 am ET)
      1 1
      APPARENTLY, SHE HASN'T LEARNED MUCH FROM THIS SITUATION. THE RACE CARD WAS UNFAIRLY PLAYED AGAINST HER, SO WHAT DOES SHE DO? SHE GOES AND PLAYS THE RACE CARD UNFAIRLY AGAINST BREITBART AND FOX NEWS. LESSON NOT LEARNED.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Woody Brown (July 22, 2010 1:03 am ET)
        1
      The NAACP ought to bring suit again Fox and Breitbart for libel.
      They ought also bring suit against the Dept. of Agri. for unlawful termination without cause.

      Sometime needs be done to turn the tide of yellow journalism and the half-cocked, zero-tollerance, leap before you look mentality which has crept out of under-educated America and into our Government--the very people who are supposed to be a model of due-dilligence.

      This whole incident could have been avoided by applying any degree of common sense...and taking a stand against the current trend of using news formats for propaganda purposes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (July 22, 2010 1:19 am ET)
      1 1
      I personally thought the telling feature of the audio clip of Sherrod's presentation was not her words, but the reaction of the audience.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wanderwoman (July 22, 2010 7:37 am ET)
        1 1
        Then you must have noticed that they reacted the most positively when she got to the part where she talked about how it wasn't black and white, it was about helping poor people.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by neil63 (July 22, 2010 8:42 am ET)
      1 1
      The present media blames the President's office and Agriculture. No one but MSNBC's Rachel Maddow has the courage to stand up and identify Fox as equally guilty with the Blogger. Last night, she provided four instances where Fox has done this before.

      Fox should be forced to stop calling themselves...media. Worse yet..fair and balanced.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by grunt (July 22, 2010 10:15 am ET)
        1
      The title of this story is laughable. I'm not going to defend Breitbart. However, when someone accuses you of being racist, it doesn't make them racist. Obviously, Sherrod was admitting to having issues with race in her past. She refers to "one of his kind" when referring to the white farmer. Her story is a great one. She has tried to redeem herself through time and through her actions. She recognized her own racist tendencies and grew past that. That is a great achievement.

      However, based solely on this story, how can she call Fox racist? They didn't cover the story until after she was fired. Also, only their opinion shows covered the story in the evening. I am dumbfounded by her accusations of racsim. Why does it make a person or an organization racist for posting a video that at first glance appeared to show a gov't employee spewing racist sentiment? Now, their journalistic integrity and ability can be questioned, but I don't understand the racist angle she is taking.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 2:15 pm ET)
        2 2
        I am dumbfounded by her accusations of racsim. ---grunt

        No grunt you are just dumb.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by grunt (July 22, 2010 3:12 pm ET)
          2 2
          What a reply. You don't address a single point that I made above. You pick out a line with a typo. You see the word "dumb" in dumbfounded, and you call me dumb. Is this the best that MMFA has to offer from its members?

          I would love to have a debate with you on the issue, but based on your post, it would probably be full of insults from you. Too bad we can't have a decent debate anymore.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 3:33 pm ET)
            2 1
            Address the lies and distortions you posted will be a waste of my time. How can she call Faux racist? How about a news site running with a Brietbart edited video? How about the rush to judgement about ACORN video,the NBPP and Van Jones? Just do a causual stroll through the archives of this site. Just look at how Faux and Brietbart in the past has used race as a dog-whistle to it's audience to stoke racial fears and divide people. You can't be that blind.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grunt (July 22, 2010 5:03 pm ET)
              1 3
              -"How about a news site running with a Brietbart edited video?"

              are you talking about the Fox News website or the television channel? They didn't run the story until the opinion shows came on in the pm slots. SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN FORCED TO RESIGN BY THEN!!! Who all ran the story on Fox? Do you even know??

              -"How about the rush to judgement about ACORN video,the NBPP and Van Jones?"

              The ACORN videos spoke for themselves, and the action taken by Congress says so. You can deny what those tapes said all you want, but Congress acted and have not retracted that action. Should Fox News have buried that story? Tell me how they were wrong or racist on that story. I guess all of Congress including the Dems are racist as well. The NBPP???? Are you serious??? They should let that go, but everyone that has ever had a conservative thought should air and condemn any tea party questionable statements??????? Are you being serious? A member of the NBPP said he hated "crackers" and they should kill "cracker babies". I guess they should let that go in light of the racial conversation going on in our country right now? Van Jones? What about him? Do you think that had anything to do with his race? He opened his mouth and Fox News/ Glenn Beck used his own words to paint a picture of the man. Why do you see racism in that? Have they not talked about MULTIPLE OTHER members of the Obama administration? The Van Jones story has nothing to do with his race. IT has to do with his WORDS!

              -"Just look at how Faux and Brietbart in the past has used race as a dog-whistle to it's audience to stoke racial fears and divide people"

              Sherrod said she had never heard of Breitbart before this stroy ran so how can she bank on his past to reference his racism? You can say that they are using people's fears about race to divide us, but I don't feel divided. I feel like there are still racist people of all races. I will stand together with anyone of any race who is sensible and condemns racism from any race. You may feel divided. If so, you may want to check your own racist sentiments, and examine why you feel divided.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (July 23, 2010 9:38 am ET)
                1  
                You may want to check your sources grunt you are being lied to. The ACORN video spoke for themselves really? Yea like the Sherrod tapes spoke for themselves? I guess over at faux they didn't bother to tell you that those tapes of ACORN by O'keefe and pushed by Breitbart were heavily edited like those of Sherrod. Before sttempting to debate someone please inform ypurself. It's a waste of my time to have educate you things that most informed(not faux news cobnsumers)people would know. Here's some reading material for you:

                B'klyn ACORN cleared over giving illegal advice on how to hide money from prostitution

                Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/03/01/2010-03-01_bklyn_acorn_cleared_over_giving_illegal_advice_on_how_to_hide_money_from_prostit.html#ixzz0uVaT5cPD

                http://judiciary.house.gov/news/091222.html

                Then there is the "Report of the Attorney General of the Activities of ACORN in California

                Guess what they all exonerate ACORN. Yes our congress was duped by Brietbart and O'keefe. The video were doctored they all found just like Brietbarts video of Ms. Sherrod.

                I know how much you cons like videos so in case all thatvreading gets to you this Rachel Maddow segment should be easier for you to consume or maybe not:

                http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/04/07/rachel_maddow_acorn_tapes

                I can't believe YOUR serious and won't tske much more of your time or waste more of time answering all the Faux hyped misinformation you spew. Glenn Beck lied about Van Jones using edited video and outright lying. Van Jones never went to jail during the Rodney King riots infact Van Jones was never in jail and wasn't even in Los angeles at the time of the riots. This article highlighted here goes on to the refute the many lies Glenn beck told about Van Jones from being a communist to being a Czar(for crying out loud:
                http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eva-paterson/glenn-becks-attack-on-van_b_271518.html

                You can read more here:
                Glenn Beck's Crazy Lies About Van Jones

                http://www.alternet.org/environment/142310/glenn_beck's_crazy_lies_about_van_jones

                You ask if Van jones attack had anything to do with his race. I ask you what is the one common demonator in the Shirley Sherrod pnony tapes,the ACORN videos,the NBPP case and Van Jones? If you said race you would be correct. Faux and Brietbart understand full well what the historical divisions are in this country. I mean a resolution saying that the tea-party should dissasociate itself from the racist elements within it's movement(not calling the tea-party racist)by a the leading civil rights organization in the country caused a "retaliation" in the words of one of the libertarian posters here. "What did we think would happen? All is fair in love and war," he/she said. That such a benign statement could cause a war is revealing in itself as is justifying the deliberate dissemination of misinformation and outright lies to destroy your "enemy". The enemy in the Sherrod case Ms. Sherrod herself ,the NAACP and ultimately the Obama administration. A skillful play on the prejudices and fear that somehow this country is being led down a path of appeasing poor and people of color at the expense of "real" white Americans. On almost every issue this theme shines through that you can't see it should be concern that maybe you need to check your information sources and your own biases the racism you question in me may be your own.



                Report Abuse
                • Author by grunt (July 23, 2010 10:50 am ET)
                    1
                  I couldn't understand quite a bit of your post, but I will address what I could read and made sense.

                  -"I guess over at faux they didn't bother to tell you that those tapes of ACORN by O'keefe and pushed by Breitbart were heavily edited like those of Sherrod."

                  To start, your post proves nothing about racism. It discusses possible distortions and misrepresentations, but nothing on the racism topic other than one line that I will address later. If the tapes didn't show any wrongdoing by ACORN employees, why were several of them relieved of their duties at ACORN? Was that a rush to judgement? If so, why did it take days, and why did Bertha Lewis speak out against those employees and their actions? You spoke about me educating myself several times, yet you seem to see only a very small portion and section of this story. You say Congress was duped. They had plenty of time to find the truth, and after investigating, they elected to pull their federal funding. I guess Bertha Lewis was duped too???

                  -"Van Jones never went to jail during the Rodney King riots"

                  It is now obvious that you get your news and summaries of Beck's show from only sources like MMFA, MSNBC, and HuffPo. That doesn't make you informed of what he has done or said on his show. Beck's problem with Van Jones wasn't some kind of hangup with him having been in prison. It was that Van Jones was supporting a cop killer. It was that Van Jones was giving speeches telling his audience we should "give them the wealth" speaking of Native Americans and other minorities. It was Van Jones saying that "white polluters" are poisoning minority communities. The Huff Po article you posted addresses only the surface of what Beck has on Van Jones. Maybe you should find some Beck program archives and educate yourself on what he said instead of trusting second hand sources.

                  -" I ask you what is the one common demonator in the Shirley Sherrod pnony tapes,the ACORN videos,the NBPP case and Van Jones?"

                  Ummm, ACORN has nothing to do with only black people. They service poor communities, so you may want to scratch that one off of your racist conspiracy list. Sherrod is black, and the NBPP case deals with blacks. However, you act like those are the only stories or people Beck has ever covered. What about George Soros? Anthony Weiner? Chris Dodd? Blago? Cass Sunstein? Weather Underground? William Ayers? Rathke brothers? Would you like me to go on? You can't say that because someone covers a story involving black people they are racist. In fact, it isn't racist to paint a black person in a negative light if you are addressing THEIR WORDS AND ACTIONS. If it is based on their race, that is racism. It isn't racism when it is based on their action. In fact, your stance somewhat makes me wonder again about your own racial issues...

                  I could go on, but I think you get my point. Please, don't act as if you need to educate me. Also, you may want to find more neutral sources that aren't rank with partisanship. I respect Rachel Maddow, even though I disagree with her on most everything, but your other sources are insulting in their dishonesty and shallowness.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (July 23, 2010 12:48 pm ET)
                    1  

                    A skillful play on the prejudices and fear that somehow this country is being led down a path of appeasing poor and people of color at the expense of "real" white Americans.---congero


                    No I don't get your point. What about the above statement you don't understand? How is not everything I posted and most of your comments not connected to that conclusion. Van Jones wanting to give money to Native Americans and other minorities as you put it. Your whole post validates my conclusion. You have bought the lie that this administration "hates white people and white culture," and is out to redistribute
                    wealth from "real Americans" to the poor and underserving minorites. The vehicles they used to paint this picture I've outlined above. The question of race as Shirley Sherrod talked about has been used to divide people . That is undeniable. Beck ,Faux, and the conservstive media have used issues of race to do just what I described and your are proof that it works on some.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by congero6189599 (July 23, 2010 1:23 pm ET)
                      1  
                      “People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”
                      – Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, chapter 6

                      “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
                      – Joseph Goebbels

                      How big a liar are we talking about here? Try this one on for size:

                      “We will reclaim the civil rights moments — because, dammit, we were the people who did it in the first place.”
                      – Glenn Beck, May 26, 2010

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by grunt (July 23, 2010 3:09 pm ET)
                          2
                        -"We will reclaim the civil rights moments — because, dammit, we were the people who did it in the first place."

                        Who do you believe he was talking about in that statement? I'm sure your answer will blow me away, but you might want to think long and hard before you answer because I am sure you didn't listen to his show around this quote, and understand who he was talking about. Let' hear it...
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by congero6189599 (July 24, 2010 5:09 am ET)
                          2  
                          If Glenn Beck included himself in the "WE" he's a liar. lol. Elizabeth Dilling . C.W.Skousen. Do yourself a favor and look them up. Square that with your "WE" were the people who did it in the first place.
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by grunt (July 23, 2010 3:07 pm ET)
                        2
                      -"You have bought the lie that this administration "hates white people and white culture," and is out to redistribute
                      wealth from "real Americans" to the poor and underserving minorites."

                      I never said that. Van Jones did. I never called anyone undeserving based on race or gender or whatever. I believe people have a right to their property no matter their race. I DIDN'T MAKE A RACIAL ISSUE OUT OF THIS. VAN JONES DID!!! I don't know Obama's heart. I can't know who he loves and/or hates except by his actions. I think he is highly inept, but I don't think it is because of hate. I think it is because of ignorance. I think Van Jones sees many issues through the prism of race and collectivism instead of the prism of personhood and individuality.

                      -"The question of race as Shirley Sherrod talked about has been used to divide people."

                      I don't agree with that. I don't feel divided from any other race. I feel like there are racist of all colors. Again, I will stand with anyone of any race who stands against racism. Agin, if you feel divided, maybe you should check who and how you are aligning with people. Are you aligning based on ideology and principles or based on race??

                      -"Beck ,Faux, and the conservstive media have used issues of race to do just what I described and your are proof that it works on some."

                      What has worked on me? I think Obama believes in redistribution through the force of government. Is there any denying that? We are straying from the point though. I addressed your points about Beck and Fox News and the strories they have covered as a racist (Van Jones, ACORN, NBPP). I picked your point apart, and you ignored my point, but went on calling Fox and Beck racist for covering these stories. What say you?

                      My only other point to this is going to address one of your earlier points. Why do you not call it divisive when MSNBC and MMFA constantly call the Tea Party racist? Why is that not divisive?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (July 24, 2010 4:58 am ET)
                        2  
                        You took apart my arguments. lol. You've just validated them.
                        Report Abuse
    • Author by queenaurelius (July 22, 2010 10:54 am ET)
      2 1
      Right On Shirley! I and many others out here support you. I believe you can bring a bright light to the heart of the matter, the promotion of fear and hate by extremist groups such as the tea party faux news such as by fox news.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MilitantMNMan (July 22, 2010 1:57 pm ET)
      2 1
      What kills me about about Breitbart is how he seems like he's going to have a nervous breakdown everytime he is approached on his BS. He starts sweating, fuming, foaming, and screaming every time he gets called out. I wonder about his sanity, actually.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nohyphenamerican (July 22, 2010 2:21 pm ET)
      1 1
      The "racism" in America has gotten worse with Obama Adm. I think they perpetuate this to deep everyone on edge and to keep their sluggish base agitated against anyone else that might offer help from the yoke of welfare and affirmative action.

      Shirley can blame anyone she chooses...her president created this atmosphere. If you think Beck is to blame, you don't watch his program. Plus!! the reason the Adm is so angry with Beck is he "repeats" their words back to them and makes them public. He gives us facts that we can check. He took up for Shirley, so try watching and listening to the truth for a change

      ...She should be angry at the NAALCP...they knew the truth about all of this all along and did not say one word.

      Secondly, it seems the Adm would have listened to the whole statement and not taken anyone's word for anything. Morally Weak people.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by FreelancerCam (July 22, 2010 2:46 pm ET)
        1 1
        How right you are.... I started watching Beck as a result of visiting this site. The White House is scared stiff about Beck because he DOES use their own words and videos. When a website goes after ONE news source, it shows just how desperate they are.

        This administration feeds the public's appetite for controversy and unfortunately they chose race to use as their wedge. Ms. Sherrod was thrown under the bus to exploit racial tenshions and tried to blame it on Fox when Fox never mentioned her until AFTER she resigned under pressure from said White House.

        What did she get from the president? Wow! a 71/2 minute phone call where he apparently refused to accept any blame as usual. She should sue the USDA for all she can because it was an obvious case of wrongful termination.

        Since the NAACP had the entire tape in it's possession the whole time, it's a fine example of race baiting gone wrong. Most people aren't buying into the manufactured racial tensions being hyped by the administration to garner more minority votes.

        I'm quite sure Ms. Sherrod never blamed Fox but since this website is dedicated to smearing Fox, it was added in the title of the article for effect. In fact, in all of the interviews I've seen online, she has yet to blame Fox. She has however blamed the president. Enough said.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 3:14 pm ET)
          2 1
          This administration feeds the public's appetite for controversy and unfortunately they chose race to use as their wedge. Ms. Sherrod was thrown under the bus to exploit racial tenshions and tried to blame it on Fox when Fox never mentioned her until AFTER she resigned under pressure from said White House.-----FreelancerCam


          The mind of a authorutarian is amazing. dang the facts! Even Brietbart is not saying he was set-up. have you read his bogus reasons for trying to slime Ms. Sherrod. He was trying to use race to smear the NAACP and Ms, Sherrod and this administration not th other way around. Get your head out of your butt.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (July 22, 2010 3:05 pm ET)
        1 1
        The yoke of welfare and affirmative action?
        Show some actions by the administration to encourage racism.
        I've seen Beck jump on both sides of this. I see there are still 99 pages of headlines under the beck link on site.
        The administrations actions have been aknowledged.
        How would you feel if B's name was Dan Rather?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (July 22, 2010 3:07 pm ET)
        2 2
        Yes the POTUS created this atmosphere? Why because he's not one of us? He's a...he's an A-rab. Remember Mc/Same having to admonish the women in red during one of his presdential campaign stops? Or was it because he wass not like us ,he palls around with "terrorist" even though the women SP giving the speech husband belonged to a seccesionist party called the Alaska Independence party who has ties to other racist sucessionist parties in the south and whose founder damned America. Maybe it was because Obama has not shown his birth certificate(even though he has)proving he wasn't a muslim born in Kenya.

        Phoney american your selective memory aside the POTUS nor the USDA pushe this phony story. where is your outrage at those who distributed this edited tape in order to destroy a wonderful black women and paint the NAACP as racist. What does it say about the morality of those who passed these lies out?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TruthSpotlight (July 22, 2010 10:15 pm ET)
        1
      It's amazing how cowardly Sherrod is. She is avoiding the calls of fox, O'Reilly and Beck and running like a lying dog. This is her chance to voice her opinion and viewpoint and maybe even put this event away. But she would rather keep on running from the fact based Fox team.

      Never trust anyone who will not stand to a challenge or fair debate. Challenge only makes us stronger - and we may learn something if we are wrong. If we are right we can be edified and vindicated.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (July 23, 2010 9:42 am ET)
        2  
        You are crazy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (July 23, 2010 2:51 pm ET)
          2  
          Hard to believe, isn't it? truth is spotty thinks she should go on Fox, the outlet that is a propoganda arm of the Republican Party, to say what she has already so eloquently said on more credible news sources? Sheesh.

          Haven't you any shame, spotty?
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.