Sherrod: I'm a Victim of Breitbart, Fox 'Racism'
July 21, 2010 11:40 am ET by Joe Strupp
Shirley Sherrod, the former Agriculture Department Georgia Director of Rural Development, says she is a victim. A victim of poor reporting and, as she contends, clear bias and racist coverage from both Andrew Breitbart and Fox News.
"When you look at their reporting, this is just another way of seeing that they are (racist)," Sherrod told me about Fox in a lengthy interview Tuesday night. "But I have seen that before now. I saw their reporting as biased during the Bush Administration and the Clinton Administration."
Sherrod was forced to resign on Monday after a portion of a taped speech she gave last March was posted at Breitbart's Biggovernment.com.
In the edited tape, she spoke about how she had not initially helped a white farmer as much as she could have in 1986 when he was going to lose his farm. In the posting, Breitbart made it appear as though the story had occurred during her time as a federal official and not 24 years ago when she worked for a non-profit organization.
Breitbart also did not include the entire context of the speech, in which she later explained that she learned from the situation and ended up helping the farmer, Roger Spooner and his wife. Both Spooners spoke out several times Tuesday to support Sherrod and voice that they would have lost their farm if not for her help.
Breitbart has since posted the full version of the tape, but his original posting also remains.
"It was a time when I realized that they did some of the same things to white farmers that they did to black farmers," Sherrod said about the speech. "I thought that all white farmers got the best treatment, but I found out in this case that was not so."
Explaining the speech further, Sherrod said, "I am trying to say to the people there that it is time for us to move forward. We do not want to forget the past and be in a position that racism is there and we don't see it. We want to move together. Our area of the state cannot grow and thrive until we learn to get along."
But after Breitbart posted the video clip, Sherrod said the lack of context and explanation sparked anger against her. She said she found out about the clip when someone e-mailed a link to her and asked about it.
"I couldn't believe it. I found this out when someone sent me (a link to) the tape, people who follow him, who put it out there," Sherrod said about Breitbart. "I got crank calls right away. Someone sent me an e-mail and link and said 'shame on you' and other stuff. I was sitting in a meeting and I was really upset.
"I texted back that they were so wrong and that they need to know the message and they got it wrong."
Sherrod said Cheryl Cook, USDA deputy undersecretary, called her Monday and said she had to be on administrative leave."
She adds: "People were calling and writing the Department of Agriculture in Athens, Ga., and Washington to tell them about it. That I needed to be fired. That a racist like me had no business working for the department. That is the way they intimidate people and it worked."
By the end of the day Monday, she was forced to resign.
Sherrod, 62, said her first reaction was shock that, after a career working for civil rights and as the daughter of a father murdered by racists, she would be seen in such a terrible light.
"To have people say that I was such a racist was unbelievable," she said of the fallout from the video and Fox coverage. "My whole life, if you look into what I have done, my father was murdered in 1965. If you look at all of us, we all hurt with that and we got involved into the movement and channeled our effort into good, instead of hating.
"I am getting hate calls and e-mails at this point. I got one call last night at my house at 12:30 a.m. that said 'you lost your job, good for you' and 'bitch' There are people out there who will believe that I am a racist person, even though the story is getting out there."
She said her husband, Charles, and her two children, who also live nearby in Athens, Ga., were surprised, but have been toughened by years of seeing her work in the civil rights movement: "They had to grow up in the movement so they have had to deal with stuff like this through the years. We did not always take the easy road. They have some thick skin as a result."
But the clear damage to Sherrod comes from Breitbart, who posted the tape without context, and Fox, which ran with the story and did not seek to confirm it.
"The news media should tell it like it is and not the way they want it to be," she said.
Sherrod said Breitbart never contacted her before posting the video clip to ask about it.
"I never heard that name until a few minutes ago," she said Tuesday night about Breitbart. "He never contacted me. I think they intended it to be what it ended up being, a racist thing that could unite even more the racist people out there who follow them."
She also said Fox News never checked the facts with her before posting a story and the video clip.
"Not before they reported it," she said of Fox's negligence. "They have called me today and initially I had said yes (to an interview), but I thought about it and I did not think they intended to be fair in their reporting. They are going to say what they want to say regardless of what I say."
She said Fox showed no professionalism in continuing to bother her for an interview, but failing to correct their coverage.
"I think they should but they won't. They intended exactly what they did. They were looking for the result they got yesterday," she said of Fox. "I am just a pawn. I was just here. They are after a bigger thing, they would love to take us back to where we were many years ago. Back to where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person."
Still, Fox continued to push for an interview with her, Sherrod said.
"It was unbelievable. I am refusing to be on there. They have been calling me and calling me. I have refused to do an interview because they are biased," she explained. "I don't think Fox News does it fairly. It is worse so now. I have sat and listened to the way they cover the news even before this administration and I saw what was going on."
Sherrod said this situation has worsened her view of racism in media coverage.
"I think it is race. You think we have come a long way in terms of race relations in this country, but we keep going backwards," she said. "We have become more racist. This was their doing, Breitbart put that together misrepresenting what I was saying and Fox carried it."
Sherrod said she has gotten no future job offers and believes this will scar her reputation forever, even if all the facts come out.
"There will be people who always think of this," she said. "I can see in the future whatever I do, this story will be recounted, no matter what. This will be brought up. People will constantly be trying to point out negative things."
Have other job offers come up? "No, no one. People are afraid of me now, I guess, with all of this. That is the other fallout from this. Anyone would be afraid of me, maybe I am a troublemaker, a racist."
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said he is reviewing the matter, hinting that Sherrod could possibly get her job back.
Asked if she would return if asked, she said: "I think I would have to go back for a short time, even if I did not stay for a long haul. I would need to prove a point, that I can be bigger than them. I was doing a lot of good things. People had access to that office that never did before. I had reached out to the poorest counties."
Despite that, she plans to carry on.
"I will go back to doing what I was doing before, working with people, trying to build," she said. "There are a lot of projects in Georgia I have been involved in creating. I will get busy with that again."
Sherrod said she is considering legal action, perhaps against Breitbart, Fox or the federal government:
"I don't know enough to know. I wish I did. I would love to sue. I am going to talk about it. I have been getting calls from all over the country. I don't want to leave one stone unturned."
Sherrod said she has been helped by many media outlets, such as CNN and others that have allowed her to explain the truth, enough so that the NAACP retracted a statement Tuesday that had denounced her.
She said that has convinced her to trust some media outlets, noting she had plans to be on Good Morning America and NPR Wednesday.
"The only one I refused to do is Fox," she said, adding the fair coverage by others "makes me think highly of some of the media, but not any better about Fox. It is a bad taste in my mouth dealing with them. It would help some if they apologized and say they were wrong, but I don't see that happening."

















I hope at least some of the people who made fun of Hillary Clinton for discussing the vast right-wing conspiracy realize she was right all along. If this incident (along with the massive amount of evidence that MMFA has accumulated over the years on other incidents) doesn't convince people, they are not interested in reality and evidence. Nothing will convince them because they want to believe otherwise.
You are not interested in the topic either? Which is Faux and fiends and their attack machine.
I'm ALL for suing this slimy little jerk, together with any benefactors who are hiding under rocks.
Big big life lesson here, for so many. She is helping to expose the hate and lies and that takes a very strong soul.
My local talk radio host was spewing hate about her with the lies yesterday on my way home. I never call these creeps but I had to this time. I called him to tell him that he was wrong, that he didn't do his research and that he wasn't telling the whole story and crucifying this woman. He SCREAMED at me and basically called me an idiot. Today he had to eat a big fat slice of humble pie and apologize to his listeners and he played the entire audio of her speech.
Ms. Shirley, you did have many voices speaking for you yesterday. I wish you and your family the very best.
Annette
Indeed. Andrew Breitbart clearly deserves to be sued for libel.
Breitbart, a right-wing extremist driven by a deep-seeded hatred of liberals/progressives, was so driven by his anti-liberal hatred that he abandoned the rules of journalistic fairness and committed libel against Shirley Sherrod by posting that edited tape knowing full well that the material it was posting was false. Reckless disregard for the truth is grounds for a libel suit.
Breitbart committed defamation against Sherrod's character by accusing her of being a racist, when the full videotape of her speech clearly shows that she is not. Deliberate defamation of a person's character constitutes malice and is grounds for a libel suit.
I hope that Sherrod sues Breitbart for everything he's got.
Apparently, having Limbaugh spew racist bile 5 days a week, and FOX spewing racist bile 24/7 wasn't quite anti-black enough for them.
Good luck, rightwingers, in your fight to urge Americans to hate blacks! I can't see a downside in a country that' becoming increasingly multi-ethnic.
The applause as I hear it is for overcoming a prejudice. You think a multi ethnic group is going to applaud sticking it to whitey when whitey is a part of the group?
I want to know why Sherrod has suddenly decided that Fox and Breitbart are to blame, and that they are racist? Fox did not air anything until after she was asked to resign.
Shirley Sherrod sure if their was a reason to be rascist had one. How do you ignore what was done to her and her fasmily? Her father and uncle murdered by white fsrmers that never faced justice. The cases thrown out because you had to prove that at the time of the murders you had to prove that the murderers intent was to deprive the victims of their civil rights. WTF! How did you forget the part of her story where she says her father wanting a son for over 17yrs. being murdered 2 months before the birth of his only son and their house having a cross burned on their front lawn by "gator" the sheriff and the local Klan. Gator who bragged about killing and beating black farmers and never being prosecuted for his crimes. How could you forget the parts where she describes the poor black farmers working all their lives to obtain property then by hook and crook having those lands stolen from them for pennies by local authorities?
Yes if anyone had a reason to hate it was Ms. Sherrod but she overcame all of that over 24yrs. ago. You want to use a tiny clip to proclaim "racism". A tiny clip that was preceded by the above story of racism against her and one that seemed to say tell your story sister not get "whitey". Did you hear the Amens and applause and reactions when she said God helped her understand through her experiences with the Spooner family(who say she went out of her way to help them save their farm they have to this day)that the issue was not just one of race but of the have and have nots. That racism didn't always exist(remmember her talking about indentured servatude?)but was used to divide people and keep poor blacks and whites from fighting together to improve their lots. How did you ignore the Amens and approval voiced when she lamented that she wished more white people were in the audience and that we must move beyond this issue of race and not let that keep us from working together,black,white,latino,Asian et.al., to improve our our communities our society our nation.
She then went on to challenge the young the people in the audience to get education ,to own businesses. She said we came from school and had to go work in the fields ,the young today have no such obligations use that freedom to improve yourselfs and your community she said.
We have heard the video doughpoo ,you have heard the racist dog-whistles that Faux,Brietbart and the likes of "Gator" the sheriff use to manipulate and control to divide common folk from seeing the commonality of their struggles. Divide and conquer using the age old "race" card as the means. It always seem to work on you guys.
I'd say "try to keep up", but it looks like a pretty tall order.
Oh, and the audience - they were laughing because they recognized that feeling she was describing, of being tempted by the easy path of resenting past mistreatment, but then doing the right thing anyway.
SANCHEZ: In all your time knowing Shirley Sherrod, has there ever been anything about her, either through her attitude, her words, her opinions or behaviors that would lead you to believe that she is in any way a racist?
ROGER SPOONER: No way in the world. No way. No way. I don’t even want to talk about it. It don’t make sense. She was just so nice to us as — she didn’t — there wasn’t no — there wasn’t no racism attitude at all in it. Heck no. … They don’t know what they’re talking about. Let me say. They don’t know what they’re talking about, if you want to know my opinion.
ELOISE SPOONER: She always treated us really good. She was nice mannered, thoughtful, friendly. Good person.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/20/sherrod-white-farmers/#comments
But even if what you allege was true and it is not. How do you compare that to the institutional racism that was and is being practiced against people of color? It's very telling that despite all the evidence that has come out you and other so-called cons still cling to 45 seconds of a video sharing an incident that happened 24yrs. ago that is part of a 43 min. speech in which the theme was one of redemption and growth and unity. Your story is crumbling all around you yet you still cling to this made-up issue. Pathetic and revealing.
And second, you don't seem to get it: The point is, if anybody ever had a reason to resent white people, Shirley Sherrod did. AND YET, the POINT of her story, was that rising above those feelings of resentment was the right thing to do. It is basically the opposite of racism.
She didn't have "power enough to make or break a struggling farmer..." she was, rather, a kind of community organizer (you guys sure love those!) whose only job was trying to help poor farmers - who, what a coincidence, were mostly black - to get adequate legal representation.
In the idiotic right-wing version of equality, nobody should ever even feel slightly bad about other races, and the past doesn't exist. In the grown-up version, though, there is an ugly and checkered past that does touch everything that happens today. The fact that Shirley Sherrod - who, as a black woman growing up in the mid-20th century in the rural south, was undoubtedly the object of more ugliness than most - chose to stop and acknowledge her feelings about that past, and then consciously move beyond them, is absolutely heroic. I (a white guy) am not sure I could do it if I were in her shoes.
So give it a rest with this "she had power" crap. You guys are wrong on this, just admit it for once.
I will tell you that I do not support President Obama, not because of his color, but because he doesn't tell the truth about anything! But in your hate spewing mind that will be racism!
Nice parroting of faux conservative talking points, though. Stupid, non-conservative and false, but nice job.
So, to recap:
-NAACP passes resolution saying that the tea party, which they did not label as racist, needs to call out the racist elements within the ranks,
-Mark Williams demonstrates exactly the racism that the NAACP was referring to,
-The larger tea party movement moves swiftly to denounce Mark Williams and the sentiments he expressed in his "Letter to Mr. Lincoln."
Complain all you'd like, but the above sequence of events demonstrates that the NAACP was right on, and that the tea party leadership did the right thing-that just so happened to vindicate the NAACP resolution.
Cheers.
Why in the world would there be ANY "moral outrage' for such a clearly truthful statement? The NAACP NEVER CALLED THE TEA PARTY RACIST.
They said that there are "elements" of KNOWN white supremacists and racists Groups that have infiltrated the Tea Party ( a fact), and that without those elements being expelled and called out for that racism, then the Tea Party was/is in danger of becoming merely a fringe Party that Independents and the center of America would recoil from.
How could ANY Non Racist person or Group not HAPPILY condemn the Racists discovered in their midst.
C'mon Tea Party people...expose and throw out the racist elements amongst you, and you'll get more votes than if you don't....guaranteed! It's a win-win for the Tea Party!
I'll believe that the Tea Party is something more than basically a predominately white, mostly male, rural Party, with a somewhat racist bent, when you start seeing the idiots with the racist signs and those giving similar speeches start getting their signs torn up and them escorted out and told not to return, instead of being silently condoned as they have been so far.
That'd be a good first start.
Otherwise, they won't exist in any measure by 2012.
Williams issued a “letter” on his blog, addressed to President Lincoln from colored people and extolling the virtues of slavery. Williams insists that the letter was satirical and has removed it in the face of public backlash. Neither he nor his organization, the Tea Party Express, have issued any apology.
While Williams claims the blog post was satirical, it is hardly the first racist comment made by the radio personality. He also claimed that Muslims worship a monkey god, and that Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, is a “Jewish Uncle Tom who would have turned rat on Anne Frank.”
For the person above you. The NAACP did not label the teaparty as rascist. They said it contained rascists. There's penty of evidence to support this call.
Sorry, it's my country too. Can't we all just get along?
All this, of course, is not exclusive to Conservatives.
So, there it is. I'm sure others can add to it
I think it would be nice if you could have your own opinion and still be a conservative. I think that used to be ok among conservatives, to think for yourself. I certainly support your right to do so.
Quite frankly, it's time for the FCC to come down on Fox and maybe even remove it from the airwaves or at least force it to go pay-per-view so the rich racists can still watch. Should have revived the Fairness Doctrine a LONG time ago.
So much for freedom of the press and freedom of expression. If you don't like Fox News don't watch it!!!! Clearly a large population is tuned in as per the ratings. I'm just sayin'.
Helen Thomas
David Weigal
Eason Jordan
Peter Arnett
Asheleigh Benfield
Phil Donahue
Like that kind of censorship?
Limbaugh makes a half dozen racist or bigoted comments daily. As an experiment, put yourself in the shoes of somebody Limbaugh is talking about. If his comments bother you . . . well, you get the idea.
Is there any evidence that there are racists in the tea party? Well, just off the top of my head: There's a poster that shows up at tea party rallies showing Obama as a tribal bushman with a bone through his nose. (Do a quick Google search and you'll see plenty of photos.) Do tell, what is the sober, intelligent public policy position being advanced by that one?
Think about what you wrote there. See, you are doing exactly what you say they are doing to you.
"You people are just trying to divide the country instead of uniting us."
Seems that with your post there, that you are doing an equally good job in that area.
Way to try to win others over to your way of thinking! You lost my vote by your third sentence.
And you say it's the Left doing all the bad.....
*snort*.
Thing is, if she hadn't said anything in the first place, or had ever been guilty of racism, this would have never happened.
Can you explain exactly why you think Breitbart and Fox should not be held responsible for disseminating false information?
Blame the victim? She admitted herself that she had racist tendencies, but I believe that firing her was just plain stupid. Why wasn't it investigated during the time frame that she was speaking of?
Learning.... something I can see you're not interested in.
Actually, there was no edit.
It was PART of the speech, not the ENTIRE speech!
She admitted that she grew up in the South back when Black folks didn't have a voice and didn't speak up, that her father was killed by a White man. And her experiences caused her to not trust most White folks and not to accept White folks treating as less than.
She also admitted that she was wrong on her thinking. That people were people and the real differences were between those who have nothing and those who have it all.
Her dealing with the White farmers was 26 years ago and she did not work for the USDA!!!! So she didn't need investigating because she helped White farmers not hurt them!
Then the idiots who fired her should have watched the video of the whole speech. Or maybe they did...Why call her while she's driving, make her pull over to the side of the road and make her resign immediately?
She is definitely a victim of Breitbart and Fox's lies.
And don't be fooled by the gray box with the extra commentary. Those of us who bothered to become educated before commenting know that those comments have been added since Breitbart made an ass of himself by posting the video in the first place.
Let's photoshop a picture of you holding a racist sign at a tea party rally, throw it up on MSNBC for 24 hours nonstop, get you fired from your job and then write about it on websites.
"Well if he wasn't at that rally this never would have happened right?"
At long last sir...
Are you saying there are photoshopped pictures? If you find fakes I will stand with you in denouncing the people who perpetrated the forgery, fraud and slander.
Will you stand with me denouncing Breitbart?
My reaction would be PROVE IT. Short of an unbiased source I'd immediately ignore the report.
Nevertheless, Faux bears the ultimate responsibility for the report. as a "news" organization they are expected to have a modicum of respect for the truth. They have shown time and again they have no such respect.
The USDA and the NAACP showed very bad judgment for believing the report and the people involved should be reprimanded.
Stop lying MM and get your facts straight.
BTW, this has nothing to do with "liberals" or "conservatives," hootie. Nothing on Fox/hate talk radio has a single thing to do with conservatism. NOTHING.
By the way, she was initially mad at the WH and the USDA when she first appeared on CNN. I am sure that video can be found very easily.
HOW DARE MS SHARROD!
A liberal is upset about journalistic standards?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaa!
The left OWNS slander. CBS re: George Bush false paperwork. Other network re: false car safety tests. Olbermann's baseless trip every night (isn;t he supposed to be on vacation crying about being owned by Tucker Carlson anyway)? Tawana Brawley/Al Sharpton. New Black Panthers calling for the murder of "crackers and their babies." Obama repeatedly changing his positions yet getting no coverage. Of course, there is the still umnproven claim of tea party racism or the n word being shouted at congressmen. But you dont care about the truth anyway.
I could go on for days... but the lemmings here are still enamored by the great uniter.
How does that shoe feel on the other foot now, libs? Are you capable of learning from this? Perhaps this could be the teachable moment that brings the parties closer together? I doubt it. Instead of realizing that false accusations are a bad thing, this whole mess will just get libs all wee-wee'd up to dig deeper into the Alinsky handbook and find more evil ways to screw conservatives and destroy America.
Take the high road if you can.
How do you see us taking our place in your america.
What levers of authority would you be happy with in liberal hands?
Your scatter gun approach does little to naught to establish any dialogue.
Great group.
Their hands are clean.
I mean, just because Breitbart and FOX have a history of colluding to disseminate false and misleading right-wing propaganda to attack the Obama administration certainly has no bearing on this incident of colluding to disseminate false and misleading right-wing propaganda to attack the Obama administration.
Right?
The persons at fault here are Breitbart and his enablers at Fox. But for Breitbart's cropped and edited video and Fox's pushing of same . . . NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED AT ALL.
Understand?
Furthermore, I agree - if the video was presented in its entirety, this would not even be an issue.
p.s. I want to validate your comment that you are a conservative. You have said it enough times that even the most thick-skulled person should be able to comprehend it, but....
Anyway, I am objective enough to realize that it is possible to be a conservative and yet dislike Glen Beck. hehe
Still trying to convince us that you are a conservative, I see.
Also, Sherrod's position is that of a salaried employee of the USDA. She would not fit into the category of a public figure. As far as the USDA . . . it will be hard to go after them because of the zero tolerance policy under which she was asked to resign. Her comments regarding her initial inclination to discriminate could have prevented her from ever having gotten the job in the first place . . . doesn't matter the context or the timing. The fact that she fought that urge was admirable and I applaud her for it. I'm angry because this nice woman was trashed without even knowing WHY.
I'm thinking that Breitbart and any benefactors in this endeavour need to lawyer up . . . NOW.
I think you're wrong.
Sherrod's resignation came on July 19th, as to the hour, I haven't been able to nail down yet, but...
On the July 19 edition of Fox & Friends (FOX'S MORNING SHOW), co-host Steve Doocy said that Sherrod made "a speech to the NAACP that sure sounded racist." Later, after guest-host Ailysn Camerota asserted that Sherrod's remarks are "outrageous and perhaps everybody needs a refresher course on what racism looks like," Doocy responded that Sherrod's comments are "Exhibit A."
On the July 19 edition of his show, Bill O'Reilly played the edited portion of the tape and said "that is simply unacceptable. And Ms. Sherrod must resign immediately."
•In Fox News' first on-air mention of Sherrod, Bill O'Reilly aired a portion of the Breitbart-pushed clip, then called her comments "simply unacceptable" and said Sherrod "must resign immediately."
We all know when O'reilly airs. Late in the eveining, after work hours. The Obama admin had contacted her long before that and demanded her resignation
I saw that clip from Beck, it's here on Media Matters. I wasn't surprised that he said what he said, because it was a perfect opportunity to paint the Obama administration as the bad guys, which is his MO every time he's on the air.
I didn't hear what you heard on that tape. Whoever sent it to Breitbart left out the part just before, where she stated what she stated what she was leading up to, which was that it was about poor people and not about color. Then, there was commentary inserted that stated clearly that she admitting to doing this in her position with the FDA, which was a false statement. I heard absolutely no cheering in that video, what I heard was some laughter after she made the statement that while the farmer was acting superior to her, she was trying to decide how much help she would give him. She then goes on to give more context for that. When she said that she did do as much for him as she could, I didn't hear any response from the audience.
If you watch Beck regularly, then you must be aware of the delusional stuff he says everyday about this administration. I think they were too quick in their response to this, and I think it was because they were certain that Beck would use the incident to slam them again. And he did. And I believe that if they hadn't fired. her, he would have gone a different direction to use this incident to slam them, though I admit that's speculation on my part.
He is now being so "fair" to Sherrod, that he is pretty much accusing her of being a Communist. With friends like that, who needs enemies?
MM has repeatedly taken the side of free speech and allows multiple viewpoints, which makes for a much better online experience.
Reporting trolls is like being a whiny playground tattle tale. Back your stuff up with facts or shut the heck up. Man up, use your brain, take on those you disagree with.
It sounds like you are a regular Beck watcher, since you are aware of delusional stuff he says everyday about this administration. I am not a regular Beckhead, but did watch when Martin Luther King's neice, Dr. Alveda King, was on and that was interesting.
Beck suggests Sherrod should've been made a "czar" because "she fits in with all you Maoists"
Beck: Sherrod "obviously has some sort of Marxist or redistributionist qualities to her"
Yeah, it really looks like Becky has come to Sherrod's rescue.
I once thought they provided a reasonable view of the news, but once they hired Beck, and let Hannity have unfettered run after dumping Colmes that was it for me.
The question is, where does Sherrod go to get her reputation back?
"I think it is race. You think we have come a long way in terms of race relations in this country, but we keep going backwards," she said. "We have become more racist. This was their doing, Breitbart put that together misrepresenting what I was saying and Fox carried it."> -Ms. Sherrod
I actually felt bad for this woman until now. Fox didn't report on this until AFTER she was forced to resign by the Obama administration and was slammed by the NAACP (who had the full copy of the video the whole time). Now, all of a sudden, Fox is a racist news organization that "would love to take us back to where we were many years ago. Back to where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person."?
Did she REALLY learn anything in the past 24 years? She sounds like the type of person who automatically believes that if a white person does her wrong, it MUST be because she is black and for no other reason. If a news channel reports something bad about the black president, it MUST be because he is black. Hmmmmm, let me think about this a minute...........yep, thats called playing the race card.
She is the one that ADMITTED being racist (in 1986 - not exactly the height of the civil rights movement) and it doesn't sound like she learned anything in the past 24 years. Am I supposed to be overjoyed because she found it in her heart to help a white farmer? THAT WAS HER JOB! She seems no different than small-minded white people who are nice to black folks to their face, but are the first to put their house on the market when one of them moves into the neighborhood.
None of this would have happened but for the cropped and edited video posted by Breitbart and pushed by Fox. Everything which occurred following that was their fault. It's called "causation." Breitbart and Fox OWN IT, you racist jerk.
Nice try attempting to place the blame on the victim . . . you fail.
Wrong... Fox has ALWAYS been a racist news organization.
I disagree with Barack Obama because he s 100% liberal, not because he is 50% black. Like the Tea Parties, disagreeing with Obama is NOT about race. To read the pages here makes one think that any disagreement with the president is based on racism when it is not.
So again, proof of Fox racism please.
I have seen several hundred of these abortions, and found absolute proof of what they have done to alter the meanings. This time they have definitely crossed the line. This should easily end up as a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Fox news and those involved. I wonder if Fieger might be interested in this one. Hit them where it hurts (in the pocket book).
Do you blame your keyboard for your typos?
Do you blame your keyboard for your typos?
Was it fox that photoshopped weapons out of the hands of the "victims" on the "peace ship" to Gaza? Nope.
Was it Fox News that accused Duke lacrosse players of rape? Nope.
Was it Fox News that falsified paperwork about President Bush? Nope.
Was it Fox News that feigned anger over a hitler reference to Obama when that very same news reporter had no such anger when the target was GWB?
Get the point? You can only see of you open your eyes. And by the way, Glenn Becks shows that feature prominent black historians and their role in American history is some of the best news coverage on television. I'm guessing not many readers here saw those episodes.
Oh wait, there's also that Michelle Obama "barack could get shot while pumping gas" comment made on 60 minutes (although she didn't stretch the discussion to cover what race the shooter probably would have been).
The Obama's have failed miserably to take advantage of an amazing teaching point. They could have used their success to preach to all of America that you can do anything here, no matter what color you are. But instead, the Obama's regularly play the race card as it suits them. THEY are helping to divide America, Fox News reporting on these divisive tactics is NOT the problem.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.
The whole speech is here
www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/18/obama-race-speech-r
They may not have directly caused her forced resignation, but they are definitely guilty of actively campaigning for this outcome without doing the basic investigative groundwork. Time for them to step up to the plate and spend as much time divulging the true story as they did trying to destroy Sherrod's career, acknowledging their culpability in the spread of harmful disinformation.
I hope all those who predicted that Obama is a self-aggrandizing user who lacked experience and maturity are not proven correct despite the disturbing evidence mounting.
The Obama administration and the NAACP have both apologized. The Secretary of Agriculture has also offered to reinstate her or offer her another job.
When can we expect Fox "News" to apologize for getting this so wrong?
I still have people at my job telling me that "Madam" Pelosi demanded a luxury liner to ferry her, her family and all her gay friends back and forth to San Francisco. Facts and proof really mean ZERO to them!
FINALLY, NORMAL FOLKS are "standing up:" to these nuts!! Keep up the good work people. Maybe WE can "quiet" some of this trash talk down by responding to the comments of obviously uneducated buffoons.
Don't let ANY of the "haters," get away with their filthy diatribe.
Sue Fox Noise and Andrew Ain't-so-bright bart. The latter can't afford it, so go after him first and destroy his wingnut job "business" of lying for the conservanazis.
White House staffers took heed and, based on the edited video and disingenuous story line submitted by these conservative media entities, Sherrod was forced to resign.
And now these same media outlets condemn the Obama Administration for jumping the gun based on said widely disseminated disinformation.
Essentially, Breitbart and FOX PAC (they don't qualify as a news network) are telling their audiences that people should know better than to trust the veracity of any news story being fervently promoted by ... Breitbart or FOX!
Fox News:
1. Failed to research the video further before airing. -Shame on you O'Reilly & Hannity on Monday. (-)
2. Will likely deny journalistic failure by claiming that the "talking heads" (Hannity & O'Reilly) are "commentators" and not "journalists" despite the fact that both shows air on "FOXNews" channel. (-)
3. Greta's story tonight 7/21, condemns the White House for the quick firing WITHOUT any real comment on FOX's part to break the story. (-)
4. Hannity in an attempt to avoid the subject gave little about his own part in airing the story on 7/19. Instead, he just replaced a typical 10 minute "Bash the Dems/WH/Govt." with a fluff piece with an actress in the upcoming "Ramona and Beezus" actress.
(-)
5. Props to O'Reilly for his public apology on 7/21. (+)
White House & USDA:
1. Failed to do own research on the video before reacting to FOXNews reports. Pulled the trigger too soon. (-)
2. Currently trying to make amends with public apology (+)
NAACP:
1. Failed to do own research on the video before reacting to FOXNews reports. Worried about perception....
The Media
1. In general, all too often many organizations fail to do adequate research. In addition to this, facts that run counter to their story or organizational leaning are often omitted.
Sherrard is a racist, she can't help it due to the violence and tragedy she suffered. She was a teenager in the 1960s, a time that was horrible for blacks in America. However, this doesn't excuse her comments. Racism is racism. She failed to use the "full power" of her office. She assumed the white farmer was trying to show his "superiority." These are racially motivated statements made by her.
But for entertainment purposes lets assume that Mrs. Sherrard is not a racist. Therefore, in the mig media game of lies, deception and false accusations I think the score is now something like Left - 576, Right 1.
Everybody needs to unwad their panties and calm down. I've got two words for you to put this into perspective:
Tawana Brawley.
Peace
They ought also bring suit against the Dept. of Agri. for unlawful termination without cause.
Sometime needs be done to turn the tide of yellow journalism and the half-cocked, zero-tollerance, leap before you look mentality which has crept out of under-educated America and into our Government--the very people who are supposed to be a model of due-dilligence.
This whole incident could have been avoided by applying any degree of common sense...and taking a stand against the current trend of using news formats for propaganda purposes.
Fox should be forced to stop calling themselves...media. Worse yet..fair and balanced.
However, based solely on this story, how can she call Fox racist? They didn't cover the story until after she was fired. Also, only their opinion shows covered the story in the evening. I am dumbfounded by her accusations of racsim. Why does it make a person or an organization racist for posting a video that at first glance appeared to show a gov't employee spewing racist sentiment? Now, their journalistic integrity and ability can be questioned, but I don't understand the racist angle she is taking.
No grunt you are just dumb.
I would love to have a debate with you on the issue, but based on your post, it would probably be full of insults from you. Too bad we can't have a decent debate anymore.
are you talking about the Fox News website or the television channel? They didn't run the story until the opinion shows came on in the pm slots. SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN FORCED TO RESIGN BY THEN!!! Who all ran the story on Fox? Do you even know??
-"How about the rush to judgement about ACORN video,the NBPP and Van Jones?"
The ACORN videos spoke for themselves, and the action taken by Congress says so. You can deny what those tapes said all you want, but Congress acted and have not retracted that action. Should Fox News have buried that story? Tell me how they were wrong or racist on that story. I guess all of Congress including the Dems are racist as well. The NBPP???? Are you serious??? They should let that go, but everyone that has ever had a conservative thought should air and condemn any tea party questionable statements??????? Are you being serious? A member of the NBPP said he hated "crackers" and they should kill "cracker babies". I guess they should let that go in light of the racial conversation going on in our country right now? Van Jones? What about him? Do you think that had anything to do with his race? He opened his mouth and Fox News/ Glenn Beck used his own words to paint a picture of the man. Why do you see racism in that? Have they not talked about MULTIPLE OTHER members of the Obama administration? The Van Jones story has nothing to do with his race. IT has to do with his WORDS!
-"Just look at how Faux and Brietbart in the past has used race as a dog-whistle to it's audience to stoke racial fears and divide people"
Sherrod said she had never heard of Breitbart before this stroy ran so how can she bank on his past to reference his racism? You can say that they are using people's fears about race to divide us, but I don't feel divided. I feel like there are still racist people of all races. I will stand together with anyone of any race who is sensible and condemns racism from any race. You may feel divided. If so, you may want to check your own racist sentiments, and examine why you feel divided.
B'klyn ACORN cleared over giving illegal advice on how to hide money from prostitution
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/03/01/2010-03-01_bklyn_acorn_cleared_over_giving_illegal_advice_on_how_to_hide_money_from_prostit.html#ixzz0uVaT5cPD
http://judiciary.house.gov/news/091222.html
Then there is the "Report of the Attorney General of the Activities of ACORN in California
Guess what they all exonerate ACORN. Yes our congress was duped by Brietbart and O'keefe. The video were doctored they all found just like Brietbarts video of Ms. Sherrod.
I know how much you cons like videos so in case all thatvreading gets to you this Rachel Maddow segment should be easier for you to consume or maybe not:
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/04/07/rachel_maddow_acorn_tapes
I can't believe YOUR serious and won't tske much more of your time or waste more of time answering all the Faux hyped misinformation you spew. Glenn Beck lied about Van Jones using edited video and outright lying. Van Jones never went to jail during the Rodney King riots infact Van Jones was never in jail and wasn't even in Los angeles at the time of the riots. This article highlighted here goes on to the refute the many lies Glenn beck told about Van Jones from being a communist to being a Czar(for crying out loud:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eva-paterson/glenn-becks-attack-on-van_b_271518.html
You can read more here:
Glenn Beck's Crazy Lies About Van Jones
http://www.alternet.org/environment/142310/glenn_beck's_crazy_lies_about_van_jones
You ask if Van jones attack had anything to do with his race. I ask you what is the one common demonator in the Shirley Sherrod pnony tapes,the ACORN videos,the NBPP case and Van Jones? If you said race you would be correct. Faux and Brietbart understand full well what the historical divisions are in this country. I mean a resolution saying that the tea-party should dissasociate itself from the racist elements within it's movement(not calling the tea-party racist)by a the leading civil rights organization in the country caused a "retaliation" in the words of one of the libertarian posters here. "What did we think would happen? All is fair in love and war," he/she said. That such a benign statement could cause a war is revealing in itself as is justifying the deliberate dissemination of misinformation and outright lies to destroy your "enemy". The enemy in the Sherrod case Ms. Sherrod herself ,the NAACP and ultimately the Obama administration. A skillful play on the prejudices and fear that somehow this country is being led down a path of appeasing poor and people of color at the expense of "real" white Americans. On almost every issue this theme shines through that you can't see it should be concern that maybe you need to check your information sources and your own biases the racism you question in me may be your own.
-"I guess over at faux they didn't bother to tell you that those tapes of ACORN by O'keefe and pushed by Breitbart were heavily edited like those of Sherrod."
To start, your post proves nothing about racism. It discusses possible distortions and misrepresentations, but nothing on the racism topic other than one line that I will address later. If the tapes didn't show any wrongdoing by ACORN employees, why were several of them relieved of their duties at ACORN? Was that a rush to judgement? If so, why did it take days, and why did Bertha Lewis speak out against those employees and their actions? You spoke about me educating myself several times, yet you seem to see only a very small portion and section of this story. You say Congress was duped. They had plenty of time to find the truth, and after investigating, they elected to pull their federal funding. I guess Bertha Lewis was duped too???
-"Van Jones never went to jail during the Rodney King riots"
It is now obvious that you get your news and summaries of Beck's show from only sources like MMFA, MSNBC, and HuffPo. That doesn't make you informed of what he has done or said on his show. Beck's problem with Van Jones wasn't some kind of hangup with him having been in prison. It was that Van Jones was supporting a cop killer. It was that Van Jones was giving speeches telling his audience we should "give them the wealth" speaking of Native Americans and other minorities. It was Van Jones saying that "white polluters" are poisoning minority communities. The Huff Po article you posted addresses only the surface of what Beck has on Van Jones. Maybe you should find some Beck program archives and educate yourself on what he said instead of trusting second hand sources.
-" I ask you what is the one common demonator in the Shirley Sherrod pnony tapes,the ACORN videos,the NBPP case and Van Jones?"
Ummm, ACORN has nothing to do with only black people. They service poor communities, so you may want to scratch that one off of your racist conspiracy list. Sherrod is black, and the NBPP case deals with blacks. However, you act like those are the only stories or people Beck has ever covered. What about George Soros? Anthony Weiner? Chris Dodd? Blago? Cass Sunstein? Weather Underground? William Ayers? Rathke brothers? Would you like me to go on? You can't say that because someone covers a story involving black people they are racist. In fact, it isn't racist to paint a black person in a negative light if you are addressing THEIR WORDS AND ACTIONS. If it is based on their race, that is racism. It isn't racism when it is based on their action. In fact, your stance somewhat makes me wonder again about your own racial issues...
I could go on, but I think you get my point. Please, don't act as if you need to educate me. Also, you may want to find more neutral sources that aren't rank with partisanship. I respect Rachel Maddow, even though I disagree with her on most everything, but your other sources are insulting in their dishonesty and shallowness.
A skillful play on the prejudices and fear that somehow this country is being led down a path of appeasing poor and people of color at the expense of "real" white Americans.---congero
No I don't get your point. What about the above statement you don't understand? How is not everything I posted and most of your comments not connected to that conclusion. Van Jones wanting to give money to Native Americans and other minorities as you put it. Your whole post validates my conclusion. You have bought the lie that this administration "hates white people and white culture," and is out to redistribute
wealth from "real Americans" to the poor and underserving minorites. The vehicles they used to paint this picture I've outlined above. The question of race as Shirley Sherrod talked about has been used to divide people . That is undeniable. Beck ,Faux, and the conservstive media have used issues of race to do just what I described and your are proof that it works on some.
– Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, chapter 6
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
– Joseph Goebbels
How big a liar are we talking about here? Try this one on for size:
“We will reclaim the civil rights moments — because, dammit, we were the people who did it in the first place.”
– Glenn Beck, May 26, 2010
Who do you believe he was talking about in that statement? I'm sure your answer will blow me away, but you might want to think long and hard before you answer because I am sure you didn't listen to his show around this quote, and understand who he was talking about. Let' hear it...
wealth from "real Americans" to the poor and underserving minorites."
I never said that. Van Jones did. I never called anyone undeserving based on race or gender or whatever. I believe people have a right to their property no matter their race. I DIDN'T MAKE A RACIAL ISSUE OUT OF THIS. VAN JONES DID!!! I don't know Obama's heart. I can't know who he loves and/or hates except by his actions. I think he is highly inept, but I don't think it is because of hate. I think it is because of ignorance. I think Van Jones sees many issues through the prism of race and collectivism instead of the prism of personhood and individuality.
-"The question of race as Shirley Sherrod talked about has been used to divide people."
I don't agree with that. I don't feel divided from any other race. I feel like there are racist of all colors. Again, I will stand with anyone of any race who stands against racism. Agin, if you feel divided, maybe you should check who and how you are aligning with people. Are you aligning based on ideology and principles or based on race??
-"Beck ,Faux, and the conservstive media have used issues of race to do just what I described and your are proof that it works on some."
What has worked on me? I think Obama believes in redistribution through the force of government. Is there any denying that? We are straying from the point though. I addressed your points about Beck and Fox News and the strories they have covered as a racist (Van Jones, ACORN, NBPP). I picked your point apart, and you ignored my point, but went on calling Fox and Beck racist for covering these stories. What say you?
My only other point to this is going to address one of your earlier points. Why do you not call it divisive when MSNBC and MMFA constantly call the Tea Party racist? Why is that not divisive?
Shirley can blame anyone she chooses...her president created this atmosphere. If you think Beck is to blame, you don't watch his program. Plus!! the reason the Adm is so angry with Beck is he "repeats" their words back to them and makes them public. He gives us facts that we can check. He took up for Shirley, so try watching and listening to the truth for a change
...She should be angry at the NAALCP...they knew the truth about all of this all along and did not say one word.
Secondly, it seems the Adm would have listened to the whole statement and not taken anyone's word for anything. Morally Weak people.
This administration feeds the public's appetite for controversy and unfortunately they chose race to use as their wedge. Ms. Sherrod was thrown under the bus to exploit racial tenshions and tried to blame it on Fox when Fox never mentioned her until AFTER she resigned under pressure from said White House.
What did she get from the president? Wow! a 71/2 minute phone call where he apparently refused to accept any blame as usual. She should sue the USDA for all she can because it was an obvious case of wrongful termination.
Since the NAACP had the entire tape in it's possession the whole time, it's a fine example of race baiting gone wrong. Most people aren't buying into the manufactured racial tensions being hyped by the administration to garner more minority votes.
I'm quite sure Ms. Sherrod never blamed Fox but since this website is dedicated to smearing Fox, it was added in the title of the article for effect. In fact, in all of the interviews I've seen online, she has yet to blame Fox. She has however blamed the president. Enough said.
The mind of a authorutarian is amazing. dang the facts! Even Brietbart is not saying he was set-up. have you read his bogus reasons for trying to slime Ms. Sherrod. He was trying to use race to smear the NAACP and Ms, Sherrod and this administration not th other way around. Get your head out of your butt.
Show some actions by the administration to encourage racism.
I've seen Beck jump on both sides of this. I see there are still 99 pages of headlines under the beck link on site.
The administrations actions have been aknowledged.
How would you feel if B's name was Dan Rather?
Phoney american your selective memory aside the POTUS nor the USDA pushe this phony story. where is your outrage at those who distributed this edited tape in order to destroy a wonderful black women and paint the NAACP as racist. What does it say about the morality of those who passed these lies out?
Never trust anyone who will not stand to a challenge or fair debate. Challenge only makes us stronger - and we may learn something if we are wrong. If we are right we can be edified and vindicated.
Haven't you any shame, spotty?