About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Breitbart: Why I did it

July 22, 2010 11:59 am ET by Matt Gertz

On Fox Business Tuesday night, Andrew Breitbart explained how he obtained his Shirley Sherrod smear tape and why he published it. The long and short of it is that he knew the tape existed for months, but waited until this week to effectively deploy it as a weapon.

According to Breitbart, he learned that the tape existed months ago, but didn't try to obtain it because he "didn't know what to do with this." But over the weekend, he finally determined that he did know what to do with it: use it to respond to what he believes is the NAACP's unfair statement that there are "racist elements" among tea party activists.

It was Breitbart's attempt to change the story and "send a message to these people that the tea party is going to fight back":

BREITBART: I received it as it was shown, and we had two videos that were sent to us over the internet and we asked them to send, because I wanted to get this out there as soon as humanly possible because this weekend was wall-to-wall mainstream media saying "tea party racist tea party racist, tea party racist." And I wanted to send a message to these people that the tea party is going to fight back. That if the mainstream media is not going to show exculpatory video - you know, in American, you're innocent until proven guilty? In America now, under this political correctness, under a Democratic Party that doesn't allow for the other side to get its point out, you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent and you don't have the ability to go out there on the television to ABC, CBS or NBC or to CNN to say, "look at this video, they lied." This is to tell them we're going to fight back. We're going to show you, if you want to play this game in a summer when people have bad economic conditions everywhere, if you want to go the race route? Come on.

Apparently, Breitbart was in such a rush to smear Shirley Sherrod and send that message that he couldn't be troubled to get the full video before posting his clip. Why bother? He's just sending a message; why should it matter whether what he says is true? And if an innocent woman is smeared as a racist, well, tough.

And remember -- Andrew Breitbart runs a website that criticizes the ethics of the media.

Watch:

Transcript below the fold:

ASMAN: Just a couple of facts we've got to get out about the Sherrod affair. Where did you find the tape originally?

BREITBART: I got an e-mail from somebody back in either late March, I can't tell you exactly, I think it may have been Easter weekend, early April, late March, and the person told me about this thing, and so my ADD had it so I said I don't know what to do with this.

ASMAN: But you knew at some point -

BREITBART: I honestly, I knew that it existed, I never went to the trouble of actually getting the video, I just knew that it existed and when I saw the tea party was being slandered by the NAACP absent evidence, I warned --

ASMAN: Not absent evidence, contrary to evidence.

BREITBART: Right, that they keep trying to reassert it to negatively brand the Tea Party, I told Ben Jealous, I told him to go to hell.

ASMAN: The head of the NAACP.

BREITBART: Yeah, I said, "Do you really want to go down this route? Do you really want to set Americans up against each other on race?" This is about people who do not have the ability to throw stones in a glass house. These are people who on this tape - the NAACP, they could pit me against Shirley Sherrod all they want, but when they saw this video, they saw the audience and rebuked the audience for its reaction to it. The way she was speaking in a racist language talking about that she did not give the full effort to help this white farmer and that she sent him off to the other, these people were listening to this and embracing it.

ASMAN: They were cheering, even though - hold on a second, it is important to emphasize -- even though she was being very confessional about this.

BREITBART: And candid.

ASMAN: She was being candid and open and saying look, this is the way I was, she wasn't saying that's a good thing, she was setting it up as a bad example, something you don't do.

BREITBART: I am not even sure if that's necessarily...

ASMAN: Which brings me to an important point also to ask you about. Did you edit it to or did you receive it as it's shown?

BREITBART: I received it as it was shown, and we had two videos that were sent to us over the internet and we asked them to send, because I wanted to get this out there as soon as humanly possible because this weekend was wall-to-wall mainstream media saying "tea party racist tea party racist, tea party racist." And I wanted to send a message to these people that the tea party is going to fight back. That if the mainstream media is not going to show exculpatory video - you know, in American, you're innocent until proven guilty? In America now, under this political correctness, under a Democratic Party that doesn't allow for the other side to get its point out, you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent and you don't have the ability to go out there on the television to ABC, CBS or NBC or to CNN to say, "look at this video, they lied." This is to tell them we're going to fight back. We're going to show you, if you want to play this game in a summer when people have bad economic conditions everywhere, if you want to go the race route? Come on. It is so combustible, it is the wrong route to go and as Mary Frances Berry said this is all about November. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 22, 2010 12:04 pm ET)
      14  
      But the Sherrod video does nothing to disprove the notion that there are racist elements in the Tea Party, Andrew. Admit it, you just hate poor people and minorities and feel they are fair game as targets in your political dirty tricks program.

      I'll bet Mommy and Daddy are proud of you, Andrew...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (July 22, 2010 12:23 pm ET)
        13  
        That is what is scary about right wing activism. It was bad enough when they were lying about Clinton or Gore, now they have returned to McCarthysm and destroying any low level individual who gets in their way.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Porkeater (July 22, 2010 12:32 pm ET)
        10  
        the Sherrod video does nothing to disprove the notion that there are racist elements in the Tea Party

        That is, unless you view it under the "i-am-rubber-you-are-glue" amendment to the Constitution.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (July 22, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
      13  
      and there is absolutely NOTHING in the Sherrod video that refutes the FACT of racism in the Tea Party. Nice use of the "I know you are but what am I?" defense tho.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by einreb (July 22, 2010 12:13 pm ET)
      13  
      "And I wanted to send a message to these people that the tea party is going to fight back. That if the mainstream media is not going to show exculpatory video - you know, in American, you're innocent until proven guilty?"

      Breitbart is making up this excuse after the fact. All this b.s. does nothing to mitigate his actions. It sounds like something a 10 year old would say. Breitbart isn't even a competent liar.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (July 22, 2010 12:14 pm ET)
      11  
      I said somewhere else here this morning, that Breitbart did this to try and rationalize his racism, by trying to prove that blacks are raciest, especially the scary black man in the White House.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (July 22, 2010 12:16 pm ET)
      10  
      I'll say it again. This is nothing but a fresh take on an old, foul smelling rationalization.

      "Your honor, I didn't rape that woman because I found her attractive and found the way she dressed so provocative that I couldn't control myself. I raped her because others found her attractive and found the way she dressed so provocative that they couldn't control themselves."

      You're scum, Breitbart, and, as your pathetic excuse for your pathetic deed shows with greater clarity and detail than anything you've ever offered before on your website, you're damned dumb scum as well.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (July 22, 2010 12:19 pm ET)
      11  
      His explanation seems to lack something. Oh yeah--class.

      But what do expect from an armchair bully?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by republicanblack (July 22, 2010 12:23 pm ET)
      3  
      You know this Shirley Sherrod thing, is just one part of a larger strategy. It's obvious. It is almost the same thing every time. The far-right has an agenda and they want Obama gone and the best way to do that is to bring up race, check out this article I just came across that looks at the big picture:

      http://apleblog.com/2010/07/22/the-conservative-strategy-obama-is-a-racist/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lamarsson57 (July 22, 2010 12:25 pm ET)
      7  
      Someone needs to send the man a box of diapers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (July 22, 2010 12:26 pm ET)
      7  
      Boy, I hope Ms. Sherrod sues this jackass. If he's had this since Easter, someone told him to hold off on it until now . . . all of that information will be discoverable. We'll find out who his benefactors and enablers are.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (July 22, 2010 12:27 pm ET)
      9  
      This has nothing to do with ethics or politics. MMFA is the only outlet not to be afraid of Breitbart, Murdoch, et. al.

      This is all about the politics of personal destruction and smear campaigns.

      The right wing uses losers like Breitbart, Drudge and Malkin to smear their "enemies".

      Kudos to MMFA for their hard work, dedication and courage.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eb (July 22, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
      8  
      NAACP did not call the Tea parties racist. They said there were racist elements in it. So what is Breitbart's point, that there are racist elements in the NAACP? No, it seems his point is that alleged racist statements by someone in the NAACP makes the whole organization racist. Therefore they have no place to criticize tea party behavior.

      The crazy thing is that this whole episode just shows how unwilling tea party leaders are to even address the issue of racism among their ranks.

      Ultimately Breitbart seems to be saying that the tea parties are above criticism because no one is innocent here. It seems silly to make that argument when you fail to acknowledge your own sins as well.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by grrson (July 22, 2010 1:28 pm ET)
        5  
        In my opinion, the GOP are all a bunch of racists. Even Michael Steele denigrates himself.

        A party that allows one of its members (Congressman Paul Broun, R-Ga.) to refer to the Civil War as "The War of Northern Aggression" while Congress is in session without him being publicly humiliated and laughed out of the Capitol is either fronting for racists or are racists themselves.

        I hope the straight media grows some balls sometime soon and takes on these, as Eric said on GMA, propagandists.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (July 22, 2010 1:47 pm ET)
          3  
          It is kind of impressive how the South splitting up the union and then attacking us at Ft Sumpter became "The War of Northern Aggression".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MerryMarjie (July 22, 2010 12:45 pm ET)
      2  
      I would hope this incident is the final nail in Breitbart's exposé coffin. He tried with the ACORN hoax films and people still believe ACORN was a shoddy organization, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was behind the O'Keefe attempt at bugging a congresswoman's phone. Will someone please put the sign "LOSER" on Brietbart's forehead and dismiss any future claims of his? How many times does he have to cry "Wolf!" before we stop listening to his drivel?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Mr. Katanga (July 22, 2010 12:46 pm ET)
      8  
      you know, in American, you're innocent until proven guilty?

      Funny. He didn't use this philosophy he holds so high with Ms. Sherrod.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (July 22, 2010 1:05 pm ET)
        4  
        That's because he meant in "White America"
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (July 22, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
        1 4
        you know, in American, you're innocent until proven guilty?

        Funny. He didn't use this philosophy he holds so high with Ms. Sherrod.


        Totally agree...but to be fair don't forget others [NAACP, USDA & possibly the WH] also didn't wait either before judging Ms. Sherrod guilty.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (July 22, 2010 1:17 pm ET)
      3  
      This only became a NAACP issue to him after the story got debunked. His original post was hammering this lady and the Obama administration. The NAACP was secondary.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (July 22, 2010 9:30 pm ET)
           
        Nope, that's not true.

        All along he was using Sherrod's discussion of her early discriminatory behavior and the supposed behavior of the NAACP viewers of her story to assert that they were exhibiting racist behavior just as the Tea Party was.

        It's not true to assert that it ONLY became about the NAACP after the story got debunked.

        That doesn't make his story valid in any way, of course, for many reasons. But MMFA and others, like you, have been wrong when you've asserted that Breitbart wasn't talking about the NAACP in all of this. He was.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (July 22, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
      3  
      Why Britefart did it...

      [http://homerenovatingideas.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/stack-of-money.jpg]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hope2day (July 22, 2010 4:22 pm ET)
        1  
        I love it. Now if she is as smart as I think she is that cash will be hers.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rmgosselin (July 22, 2010 2:15 pm ET)
      1  
      So he wanted to "use it to respond to what he believes is the NAACP's unfair statement that there are 'racist elements' among tea party activists"? Well, congratulations, man, you just proved them right. Again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Andy Kreiss (July 22, 2010 2:24 pm ET)
      4  
      This is a highlight to me;

      BREITBART:... when I saw the tea party was being slandered by the NAACP absent evidence, I warned --

      ASMAN: Not absent evidence, contrary to evidence.


      Translated: "Hey, we got the suckers to believe that all of that evidence of racism at teabagger rallies doesn't really exist. Let's just go balls out and say that we've proven that the teabaggers are not racist"

      It's like Asman caught Breitbart not being delusional enough, and brought him in line.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (July 22, 2010 2:31 pm ET)
      1  
      Hmmm, this sounds exactly like what I was saying yesterday - that there's a vast rightwing conspiracy to collect video on everyone on the left and then try to use out-of-context snippets from those videos to smear the Obama adminstration.

      And here Breitbart is, confirming that. How amazing is that?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 22, 2010 2:31 pm ET)
      3  
      Not absent evidence, contrary to evidence.

      This is a much bigger lie (by Assman) than anything ever said by Litefart. "Contrary to evidence?" HOW MANY photos of racist signs did MMFA find? How many can ANYONE find by usign Google? How much ift he tea party is NOT white christains?

      Give me a break!

      Absurd. The only statement being made contrary to the evidence is the one that claims that there are no racist elements in the tea party!

      -------------------------------------------------
      IMHO
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LagalLeft (July 22, 2010 3:00 pm ET)
      1  
      Thanks, Andrew. Your race baiting lies have backfired yet again. You've boosted Mrs. Sherrod's career and made yourself even less credible.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by paul8616 (July 22, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
      1  
      "In America now, under this political correctness, under a Democratic Party that doesn't allow for the other side to get its point out, you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent and you don't have the ability to go out there on the television to ABC, CBS or NBC or to CNN to say, "look at this video, they lied.""

      Hehe... What America does this jerk live in, where 'the other side' can't get it's point out? The whole premise of this sordid affair is that people like Breitbart (and whoever sent him the video) CAN and DO get their point out! It's not the fault of the Democratic Party or anyone else that their point *is a lie.*
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Rob Serrano (July 22, 2010 4:37 pm ET)
           
        You're assuming that someone actually sent him the video. I'm laying fair odds that he had it edited by his own people and is using the "sent in to me" meme to a) provide himself some deniability and b) provide something of a "lost tape" feel to the whole thing.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.