About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Washington Times' Kuhner asks "Should Arizona secede?"

July 30, 2010 6:36 am ET by MMFA Staff

In a July 29 Washington Times column, Jeffrey Kuhner claimed the ruling "is unilaterally disarming the people of Arizona in the face of a dangerous enemy," and that "leftist judges - elitist activists in black robes - override democratic legitimacy." Kuhner warned that the United States is in danger of becoming a "socialist superstate," and claimed "The choice is becoming starkly apparent: devolution or dissolution." From the Washington Times:

Judicial activism is pushing America to the breaking point. This week, a federal judge blocked key provisions of Arizona's immigration law, thwarting the will of the people. The decision was ominous and will reverberate for years to come.

Judge Susan Bolton, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, is a liberal elitist who believes judicial imperialism trumps democracy. Her ruling states that local police cannot check the immigration status of people arrested or stopped for violations of the law. In her view, that would amount to an abuse of civil liberties and unduly burden the federal immigration system. She also stipulated that residents cannot be required to carry proof of legal status.

[...]

The administration and congressional Democrats are making a strategic calculation. They think the Arizona law may be popular in the short term, not just in the state but across the country, but they are convinced that in the long term, the law will backfire on Republicans - especially with the surging Hispanic voting bloc. Mr. Obama thinks he can aggressively court the Latino vote by demonizing Arizona. This is classic Saul Alinsky-style radicalism: the politics of divide and conquer, pitting races and classes against one another in the service of state power.

[...]

Arizona is where the old republic will stand or fall. It is showdown at high noon. Either America returns to its constitutional system based on real federalism, states' rights, individual liberty and decentralized power, or it continues to slide toward the darkness of a socialist superstate. Washington - with its swollen bureaucracy, imperial arrogance, rampant corruption and dangerous detachment from ordinary citizens - is despised and distrusted by many Americans. A secession of the heart is taking place - a profound alienation from the liberal ruling class.

In the future, many states - including Arizona - may decide they have no other option but to break away from the union. The choice is becoming starkly apparent: devolution or dissolution.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 30, 2010 7:28 am ET)
      4 1
      If a left winger had dared breathe the word "secession" during the Bush administration he would have been immediately villified as a traitor. Under the Arizona circumstances, secession is crazy talk...and it's coming from a right wing movement that becomes increasingly insane very day, with the likes of Glenn Beck and other assorted nuts leading the way. I just don't see how they can work people into a frenzy day after day and not expect some explosive release of tensions.

      These people don't want a smooth functioning government. I don't know what they want anymore...they've all gone crazy. This is not a good situation for our country...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 30, 2010 8:25 am ET)
        2  
        Agreed. Zach Wamp, a Republitoad who very well may be the next governor of Tennessee, says in his campaign ads that he will fight for Tennessee's "sovereignty" under the Tenth Amendment.

        Meanwhile, you have Troglodytes like Mark Levin accusing the Democrats of trying to Balkanize the country. WTF?

        It's madness.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 30, 2010 9:56 am ET)
        1  
        I say, let them secede. And we'll see Mexico roll back in there, and take them back over, and we won't lift a finger to help. Why? Well, you ain't part of the United States anymore, have a good one!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (July 30, 2010 7:52 am ET)
         
      Amazing that anyone publishes such hackneyed rubbish.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 30, 2010 8:28 am ET)
      2  
      is unilaterally disarming the people of Arizona in the face of a dangerous enemy

      Do they have a course in absurd exageration and distortion of reality in the school where this guy got his degree?

      The court defended American and Constitutional values. Period. No one was "disarmed."

      And only an abject racist could call Mexican migrant workers "dangerous" with a strait face.

      ------------------------------------------
      ...And only another abject racist would accept that charectarization.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eb (July 30, 2010 8:33 am ET)
        1  
        Arizona is where the old republic will stand or fall. It is showdown at high noon.

        The old republic is extremely fragile and delicate
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (July 30, 2010 8:33 am ET)
      3  
      Apparently the NeoConfederate Bigots who have a stranglehold on the Republican Party think we should revisit that whole Civil War thing. They don't like the way it turned out the first time, and they want a rematch.

      Thanks a lot, FOX, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck. You guys have amassed great fortunes dressing up entertainment as serious political commentary, and you've injected a fatal poison into the American Political System. I hope you're proud.

      We're barreling down the road toward becoming a Third World Nation, and our politicians are too busy sniping at each other to get anything done. Yeah, yeah "both sides do it", but the Right Wing has made it their mission to cripple the Federal Government and turn Politics into a blood sport. Well, boys, you may get your wish.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (July 30, 2010 8:40 am ET)
      3  
      All that, in a word, is nuts.

      The judge followed precedent, right down the line, and applied the law as it exists.

      Look for the Supreme Court, ultimately to reverse a century of precedent and rule for Arizona however. The political, judicially activist, result-oriented conservative majority is out to redefine the Court and make in an overtly political source of conservative power.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by David2012 (July 30, 2010 8:41 am ET)
           
        "it" not "in" in the last line. And remove the comma after "Court". Damn, I cannot type.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by einreb (July 30, 2010 8:43 am ET)
      3  
      Jeffrey Kuhner is a columnist. He writes for a living. He has a point of view based, from the info in this story, more on his emotion than on his knowledge of the law.

      One of the less pleasant features of America's politicizing every issue, is the way people define an "activist judge." If a judge issues a ruling that doesn't fit your political view, he or she is immediately branded "activist".

      And if Kuhner is the "voice of reason" why would he suggest that a border state "break away from the union"?

      My question: Then what?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 30, 2010 9:15 am ET)
        1  
        An excellent point. Many Confederate apologists amazingly believe that we would now be better off if the South had won the Civil War. I find this point of view baffling.

        It would seem that many modern Republicans are infected with that same delusional thinking. The ascendance of a Black Man to the Presidency has given them an excuse to dust off the old pig-headed bigotry that nearly destroyed the Country in 1860.

        I shudder to think what will happen if these modern Secessionist nutbags get their wish.

        Muslim terrorists would be the least of our problems.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 30, 2010 10:33 am ET)
             
          Thing is, if they were to secede, and were we (meaning the rest of the country) actually allowed them to do so, those new "countries" would fail in no time short. No federal backing? No federal money?

          They'd quickly see that being IN the United States and being part of their alleged thumb on the neck Federal Government wasn't so bad after all.

          I'd love to see someone propose a bill, that for any state where an elected official, or someone who is running for an elected official position talks about seceding from the Union, all federal money is removed from said state. Immediately.

          They'd come crawling back in a matter of days.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by David2012 (July 30, 2010 10:52 am ET)
           
        An activist judge, by my definition, is one that regularly overrules popular opinion, and substitutes his or her own personal views, without regard to precedent. In this case, I don't see any other possible interlocutory ruling than the judge's. The federal preemption issue makes the federal government's lawsuit not only plausible, but a probable winner, based on existing case law. A temporary injunction, preserving the status quo ante while things get sorted out, is not in my opinion judicial activism.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jason10006 (July 30, 2010 11:51 am ET)
         
      The link to the article is wrong, has no one noticed? It goes to a different Wash Times story.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 30, 2010 11:59 am ET)
      1  
      Yes. And any Arizonians caught trying to cross over into the US should be shot on sight.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by aerdna (July 31, 2010 6:38 pm ET)
         
      Tell you what, he should have asked 'can' instead of 'should'. Would have saved him all the work he put in writing this article.
      Report Abuse