FLASHBACK: In 2006 joint appearance, Beck appeared to call Imam Rauf a "good Muslim"
August 23, 2010 8:30 am ET by Ben Dimiero
One of the main lines of attack in the never-ending conservative freak-out over the plan to build an Islamic community center in downtown Manhattan has been attempting to smear the developers of the center -- Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf in particular -- as "radical." In their usual despicable fashion, conservative media figures have worked hard to blur the line between the terrorists who attacked us on 9-11 and the moderate Muslims who are behind the planned center.
One of the loudest voices in conservatives' fight against the center has been Glenn Beck, who has specifically targeted Imam Rauf with blatant falsehoods and hypocritical attacks in a desperate attempt to smear him as a radical.
Additionally, among other offensive comments, Beck has asked, "after you've killed 3,000 people you're going to now build your mosque?" He's also absurdly labeled the center an "actual danger" and suggested it is an "Allah-tells-me-to-blow-up-America mosque." Though we -- and many other outlets -- have repeatedly pointed out that Rauf is widely viewed as a moderate and has often denounced the extremists who carry out violent attacks in the name of Islam, Beck and his fellow demagogues continue to push the dishonest attack.
But Beck does not need to take our word for it that Imam Rauf is a moderate who distances himself from radicals -- Rauf told Beck as much while sitting at the same table with him during a 2006 discussion on ABC's Good Morning America.
During the ABC segment, Rauf condemned the extremists who issued death threats against the Pope and political cartoonists, specifically saying that "these reactions are not at all called for by Islamic teaching. The teachings of Islam are very similar to the teachings of Christianity, of loving the one God and loving thy neighbor. These are the two common principles."
When Diane Sawyer mentioned that Imam Rauf says the radicals are just a "group of people" and "not him," Beck seemed to agree, saying "sure, sure." He added, "I believe it's a small portion of Islam that is acting in these ways."
Beck, for his part, even appeared to gesture to Imam Rauf when he invoked the idea of "good Muslims." (At about 2:45.)
Watch:
Beck's response to this -- if he bothers to respond at all -- will likely be that when this segment was filmed, he was unaware of the supposed "radical" beliefs of Rauf. However as we (and Jon Stewart) have pointed out, Rauf's statements about 9-11 that Beck and others have pointed to as evidence of his hatred of America and sympathy for terrorism track very closely with things many conservatives -- including Glenn Beck himself - have said.

















It wasn't a Duo, but a Trio featuring Glenn, Cheech & Chong?
I played the Vid Twice, then i Played it again & then i Blinked 3 Times.
Glenn is like a Ketchup Commercial, you turn 2 Bottles over to figure out which one is Hines.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
Speak truth to ketchup.
It's the only one.
Gee. Now where have I heard of another religion with its own apocalyptic myth?
Stupid man.
But he really is an idiot who's overzealous, reactionary ideologies are a danger to this country.
I'm not saying he is an idiot or dangerous to this country, but maybe he is just missunderstood.
Beck isn't missunderstood, its clear he is insane.
But I'm not saying he is insane...
Maybe Imam Abdul Rauf thought he was sharing the stage with a "good Christian" or at least a decent person and he was mistaken. This is the earliest footage I have seen of Glennie. He has said that he has talked about being on the edge of 1938, and while he has changed focuses: from Muslim terrorists to the economy, he is still claiming this today. By hey, crap floats.
Fixed their typo.
"Knew his place??" What are you? A white southern sheriff in the 50s-60s
A landing gear from Flight 175 went through the roof of the building and two of the top floors.
way to miss the point guys.
Or are all Christian's responsible for the KKK, Jim Jones, the Crusades, and George W Bush.
The questions are legitimate, and so is the question of whether or not there is anybody in here with a backbone.
Thanks for the laughs!
Sure! Sure!
An implication you're not getting from the clip is the funniest thing you've ever seen?
Nobody tell the troll why the chicken crossed the road; he'll go into cardiac arrest.
Beck played a little of the audio, up to the point where he said "Sure, sure". He and his morning zoo dimwits then built a series of increasingly ridiculous strawmen, sarcastically saying that MMFA had proved that Beck supports terrorist/was in fact a Muslim, etc. This was in between long bouts of fake LOL-ing.
Mainiac and highliter were told by Glen that this was the funniest thing they've ever heard.
He effectively distracted them from the fact that he was sitting down having a conversation with a man who, as he admitted on his radio show today, he knew nothing about in 2006, while at the same time pretending to be some sort of authority on Islam.
The Beck groupies aren't supposed to notice that, while Beck hasn't demonstrated that he has learned any more about Rauf in the last four years, Rauf has gone from a fellow guest on a tv show to Evil Incarnate.
Sometimes the wingnuts miss the humor in items here at MMFA. I don't see this as any sort of condemnation of Nostradumbass for being in the same room as Rauf, that woould only occur to the bogots pre-conditioned to think that was a possibility ( Beck Audience).
It's more of a lightweight item showing another example of Beck's ignorance and phoniness. It's also a good opportunity for the people who listen to beck to volunteer to show how easily manipulated they are.
And how about those few that then Senator Obama served on committees with? Seems that right-wingers consider his having done so make him guilty by association. Sheesh.
If the folks on Fox told you that the Sun will now be rising in the West and setting in the East, you'd believe them and repeat it as fact.
That's what he does best you know.... revise history.
Either that or he was protected by the raw bacon he always keeps in his pockets so he was being nice.
Does this mean that the new standard of endorsement is saying "sure, sure" or even "yes, yes" or "right, right" to a question when it is asked?
If so, Obama must be in agreement with almost every question he is asked.
This style of "gotcha advocacy" (I cant even call it journalism) is getting pathetic. A few weeks ago MM4A had to amend a posting because they only used a portion of the tape, changing its context (common error at MM4A).
Shirley Sherrod was told to resign because she was going to be on Glenn Beck....when he hadnt even discussed her to that point.
I have NEVER seen a headline so big on HuffPo! For this? Keep it up, you are exposing yourselves.
However, we are talking about Captain Contradiction here, so I don't see a problem pointing out yet another change/flop in Beck's ADD views of the world and the people in it. Beck does it to others every chance he gets. It goes both ways bright one.
I know, I know. I disagree, there fore L]let the troll comments begin. SO predictable.
YOU GUYS AREN'T FAIR!
Never forget to add " hypocrisy!!", wingnuts, no matter how little sense it makes.
Please enumerate.
I have my problems with Obama, and he wasn't my choice, but I'd like you to post links and information to support your claims. I've seen folks like you say this, but you never post evidence. EVER.
-bipartisanship - this obviously requires cooperation on both sides. Despite his request for republican input, the response was a lock step middle finger from the right. Without their participation, the promise failed through no fault of Obama's own.
-health insurance reform negotiations on CSPAN - again a foolish promise since he couldn't deliver it without Congress' approval.
-post-racial, post-partisan - idealistic but undeliverable. Mudslinging from the right and it's media lapdogs has seen to that.
-stimulus package- promise kept
-health insurance reform - promise kept even if not perfect, they got the best bill they could through congress
-recommitting to Afghanistan - promise kept
-ending the war in Iraq - promise kept
-no lobbyists - an idealistic but impractical promise as the administration had difficulty obtaining the best people without relaxing the rule
______________________
So what do we have? Two major legislative victories and a foreign policy perfectly inline with his campaign rhetoric. Along with a few swing-for-the-fences claims that weren't in his power to give.
You can't blame the reps for lack of bipartinship. Have you forgotten how many closed-door meetings that he held where no reps were invited? A simple vote "no" on legislation that they don't agree with is not them "standing in the way", it is them doing their job as requested by their constituents.
It would have been a lot easier if he had just campaigned on bigger government, and government takeovers of private sector businesses, right?
I mean please, how pray tell is Gleck any sort of expert on anything, much less, Muslim theology and the history of West/Muslim relations?
I don't think that's a matter of lying, it is a matter of education.
Beck's response to this -- if he bothers to respond at all -- will likely be that when this segment was filmed, he was unaware of the supposed "radical" beliefs of Rauf. However as we (and Jon Stewart) have pointed out, Rauf's statements about 9-11 that Beck and others have pointed to as evidence of his hatred of America and sympathy for terrorism track very closely with things many conservatives -- including Glenn Beck himself - have said.---MMFA
Care to explain how Beck views about 9/11 differ from Iman Rauf or I'd bet you just rather go on about us "libruls."
BTW, I do agree with your last statement. Beck is an uneducated, dishonest, con-man. If you believe any of his crap, you're in really bad shape.
Yeah, you guys sure had a handle on that with John Kerry's "I was for the 87 billion..."
I didn't hear that. Did anyone?
It was a so so interview, but because Beck didn't reach over the table and smack him, he's a good Muslim?
They were both nice to each other is all I witnessed.
Please explain your 2006 response to this interview vs. your 2010 explanation. They kind of fly in the face of each other. You are not a media watchdog organization. Can you say "playing politics"? Can you say "manipulation"? You are a political agenda organization plain and simple.