About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

FLASHBACK: In 2006 joint appearance, Beck appeared to call Imam Rauf a "good Muslim"

August 23, 2010 8:30 am ET by Ben Dimiero

One of the main lines of attack in the never-ending conservative freak-out over the plan to build an Islamic community center in downtown Manhattan has been attempting to smear the developers of the center -- Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf in particular -- as "radical." In their usual despicable fashion, conservative media figures have worked hard to blur the line between the terrorists who attacked us on 9-11 and the moderate Muslims who are behind the planned center.

One of the loudest voices in conservatives' fight against the center has been Glenn Beck, who has specifically targeted Imam Rauf with blatant falsehoods and hypocritical attacks in a desperate attempt to smear him as a radical.

Additionally, among other offensive comments, Beck has asked, "after you've killed 3,000 people you're going to now build your mosque?" He's also absurdly labeled the center an "actual danger" and suggested it is an "Allah-tells-me-to-blow-up-America mosque." Though we -- and many other outlets -- have repeatedly pointed out that Rauf is widely viewed as a moderate and has often denounced the extremists who carry out violent attacks in the name of Islam, Beck and his fellow demagogues continue to push the dishonest attack.

But Beck does not need to take our word for it that Imam Rauf is a moderate who distances himself from radicals -- Rauf told Beck as much while sitting at the same table with him during a 2006 discussion on ABC's Good Morning America.

During the ABC segment, Rauf condemned the extremists who issued death threats against the Pope and political cartoonists, specifically saying that "these reactions are not at all called for by Islamic teaching. The teachings of Islam are very similar to the teachings of Christianity, of loving the one God and loving thy neighbor. These are the two common principles."

When Diane Sawyer mentioned that Imam Rauf says the radicals are just a "group of people" and "not him," Beck seemed to agree, saying "sure, sure." He added, "I believe it's a small portion of Islam that is acting in these ways."

Beck, for his part, even appeared to gesture to Imam Rauf when he invoked the idea of "good Muslims." (At about 2:45.)

Watch:

Beck's response to this -- if he bothers to respond at all -- will likely be that when this segment was filmed, he was unaware of the supposed "radical" beliefs of Rauf. However as we (and Jon Stewart) have pointed out, Rauf's statements about 9-11 that Beck and others have pointed to as evidence of his hatred of America and sympathy for terrorism track very closely with things many conservatives -- including Glenn Beck himself - have said.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (August 23, 2010 9:11 am ET)
      25 3
      One possible explanation is that Glenn Beck is psychotic.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (August 23, 2010 9:13 am ET)
        28 3
        And a serial liar.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bad News (August 23, 2010 9:36 am ET)
          4 4
          Have i been "Serially" Wrong?
          It wasn't a Duo, but a Trio featuring Glenn, Cheech & Chong?
          I played the Vid Twice, then i Played it again & then i Blinked 3 Times.
          Glenn is like a Ketchup Commercial, you turn 2 Bottles over to figure out which one is Hines.

          Speak truth to power.


          Mr. News
          Report Abuse
      • Author by dmhack (August 23, 2010 9:17 am ET)
        7 2
        It's not one possible explanation, Irony.
        It's the only one.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Major Tom (August 23, 2010 9:26 am ET)
      21 3
      Like a minor snag like this would hold Glenn back... He currently contradicts himself in the same sentence, and no one calls him on it... Something that happend years ago? All he has to do is accuse you of thinking with a 9/10 mentality, and all his followers nod in zombie-like acceptance of their insane leader.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GrandpaMark (August 23, 2010 9:32 am ET)
      35 4
      I lost my mom to hate in '84....we stood in Bergen-Belsen Holocaust Memorial and she announced jews made the Holocaust up. She was a hateful bigot; that was 4 years prior to Limbaugh, still 6-8 years before Fox, not sure on that date. Now, after 2 decades of hate and justification for hate, my mom is unrecognizable, literally. Her face is permanently twisted into a mask of anger and hate, ALL THE TIME! She might smile in a perfunctory manner, but immediately it's replaced by a look as if we all stink and she can barely stand us. Right wing hate has twisted people in this land and it's ugly to see.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (August 23, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
        10 3
        My aunt is the same way. When my father idly mentioned in an email in 2003 that he didn't think that Bush's reasons for going into Iraq made sense, she didn't talk to any of us for 3 years. She recently hosted a Palin for President gathering (fundraiser? not sure) in Naples, Florida. She constantly talks about "them" as if "they" were some kind of coherent group plotting to take over the world, destroy Christianity, overthrow the government, and kill all her cats. I've barely spoken to her for the last 15 years because I have no idea how to have any kind of conversation with her; she is otherwise intelligent but has somehow lost all critical thinking and logic skills she once had. It's sad. Even my uncle tries to avoid talking about anything even close to politics with her, and they've been married for 62 years.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (August 23, 2010 9:33 am ET)
      21 3
      Hold on a sec. In the clip, Becky claims that a big problem with Islam is their "apocalyptic view."

      Gee. Now where have I heard of another religion with its own apocalyptic myth?

      Stupid man.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (August 23, 2010 9:40 am ET)
      11 1
      Yes, but [a craven desire to exploit emotions associated with] 9/11 changed everything!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bailorgana (August 23, 2010 9:52 am ET)
      9 2
      Glen you sad sad little hypocrite.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jollymon (August 23, 2010 9:56 am ET)
      15 2
      Glenn Beck is a passionate, energenic man who stands for what he believes in.

      But he really is an idiot who's overzealous, reactionary ideologies are a danger to this country.

      I'm not saying he is an idiot or dangerous to this country, but maybe he is just missunderstood.

      Beck isn't missunderstood, its clear he is insane.

      But I'm not saying he is insane...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (August 23, 2010 9:59 am ET)
      7 2
      "Beck, for his part, even appeared to gesture to Imam Rauf when he invoked the idea of 'good Muslims.'"

      Maybe Imam Abdul Rauf thought he was sharing the stage with a "good Christian" or at least a decent person and he was mistaken. This is the earliest footage I have seen of Glennie. He has said that he has talked about being on the edge of 1938, and while he has changed focuses: from Muslim terrorists to the economy, he is still claiming this today. By hey, crap floats.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pabobfin (August 23, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
        2 1
        GB has changed gradually... almost like he is drinking or drugging... it is taking a toll on his brain methinks.[http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.narconon.org/drug-rehabilitation/oxycontin-use-addiction.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.narconon.org/drug-information/oxycontin-information.html&usg=__Omg5GVfqSjk6SLFaT5u_fPVwoRk=&h=150&w=200&sz=33&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=HJB9A3obDqgUIM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=160&prev=/images%3Fq%3Doxycontin%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dflock%26sa%3DN%26channel%3Dfds%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D592%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=343&vpy=146&dur=179&hovh=120&hovw=160&tx=97&ty=89&ei=89tyTKXDCIm4sAOW4f2GDQ&oei=89tyTKXDCIm4sAOW4f2GDQ&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0]
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pabobfin (August 23, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
        3 1
        GB has changed gradually... almost like he is drinking or drugging... it is taking a toll on his brain methinks.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by einreb (August 23, 2010 10:00 am ET)
      9 2
      "One of the main lines of attack in the never-ending conservative freak-out over the plan to build an Islamic community center in downtown Manhattan has been the attempt to distract voters because they have no worthwhile ideas on anything."

      Fixed their typo.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Andy Kreiss (August 23, 2010 10:05 am ET)
      17 13
      Beck probably did consider Rauf a "good Muslim" back in '06. Maybe because he knew his place back then, and wasn't trying to build a slap-in-the-face Mega-Victory-mosque on hallowed ground at the exact center of Ground Zero at that time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mookworthjwilson (August 23, 2010 10:14 am ET)
        15 5
        Again, it's a Burlington Coat Factory, not Ground Zero.

        "Knew his place??" What are you? A white southern sheriff in the 50s-60s
        Report Abuse
      • Author by manndan (August 23, 2010 10:22 am ET)
        5 2
        The planes didn't fly into the Burlington Coat Factory.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by draftedin68 (August 23, 2010 10:37 am ET)
          5 1
          Well, part of one did.

          A landing gear from Flight 175 went through the roof of the building and two of the top floors.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Major Tom (August 23, 2010 10:46 am ET)
            6 2
            Regardless THEY WEREN'T THE ONES RESPONSIBLE....

            way to miss the point guys.

            Or are all Christian's responsible for the KKK, Jim Jones, the Crusades, and George W Bush.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by liberalXtian (August 23, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
            5 1
            We can't and should not preserve every dust covered building in lower Manhattan. Besides, when the actual Ground Zero becomes just another large commercial tower with a small plaque commemorating 9/11 in some dark corner. There will be more of an Islamic presence there in the businesses either invested in , or wholly owned by Arabs. Perhaps Fox News will move its offices there.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by voltaire (August 23, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
              5 1
              Exactly. You're the first person who has commented on this, and I believe it's an important point. The proposal is not to build a monument on the site, nor a park, museum or place of daily meditation. It is going to be an office building, a big commercial office building. And there will be businesses that have investors from Arab countries. And there may even be Muslim lobbying groups or associations seeking to lease space there. Or perhaps a consulate from a predominantly Muslim country. What will be the reaction then? When will this idiocy stop?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by liberalXtian (August 23, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
                3 1
                This idiocy will stop when the Republicans, conservatives and Teabaggers squeeze evry bit of political hay they can out of it.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by doughpro1604643 (August 24, 2010 8:51 am ET)
                    3
                  The "idiocy", as you call it (normal people call it "concern"), will stop when the progs and the libs stop licking a$$.
                  The questions are legitimate, and so is the question of whether or not there is anybody in here with a backbone.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Major Tom (August 24, 2010 9:16 am ET)
                    4  
                    You're the same people who don't give a damn when someone mentions the sacred sites lost by native Americans at our ancestors' hands, and don't see a shred of irony in supporting a homeland for Israelis but have zero sympathy for the Natives whose land we stole, or African Americans whose ancestors were tortured with slavery and Jim Crow... So when I hear your 'concern' about this 'sacred site,' please understand the collective yawns directed at you to your selfish, or feigned concerns.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by mescal (August 25, 2010 1:14 am ET)
                    1 1
                    The question that you SHOULD be asking yourself, doughpro, is, what is the wording and the meaning of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution? Why is the right so opposed to our founding principles? Why do bigots so love to drape themselves in mendacity and false patriotism when attempting to deny others rights that are supposed to be universal?
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by buddtee (August 23, 2010 10:34 am ET)
        9 3
        Hallowed ground yea that's a dam joke the boobie bar and the strip club are ok and so is the peep shows but don't you build a place of worship for American Muslim to worship freely and in peace .
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Handsome Pete (August 23, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
          8 1
          John Fugelsang said a few days ago, "If Ground Zero had oil under it, you'd see just how "hallowed" that ground is."
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Alone in Texas (August 23, 2010 10:39 am ET)
      4 2
      Why would you have Beck on this program, he adds nothing other than a non objective one sided view, ignorant at that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MaineiacMan (August 23, 2010 10:43 am ET)
      2 12
      Hysterical response to this post by Pat, Glenn & Stu.

      Thanks for the laughs!

      Sure! Sure!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (August 23, 2010 10:49 am ET)
        6 3
        Hilarious how they ignore their own contradictions and ridicule those who point out their hypocricy. Freaking.Genius.Mis-Direction. Our own American Hitler. (Wiping a tear) oh, ha ha, Gotta love him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (August 23, 2010 11:03 am ET)
        6 1
        Yep, Glenn is hysterical most of the time. Often with fake tears.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by highliter (August 23, 2010 10:46 am ET)
      3 11
      S--------t----------r----------e----------t---------c----------h--------------------!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (August 23, 2010 11:03 am ET)
        8 1
        Calling Glenn Beck a hypocrite for appearing with the man he's relentlessly attacking and lying about today is a stretch? How do you figure?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by highliter (August 23, 2010 11:25 am ET)
          3 11
          LOL he doesn’t come close to calling him a good Muslim. Just because he appeared with him on the same show means nothing. I watched the entire segment he doesn’t say anything about the Imam directly. This has got to be the funniest thing I have ever seen.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 11:42 am ET)
            6 2
            No ,don't worry your silly post will never be outdone. You are still the KING of comedy at this site.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by soze169880 (August 23, 2010 11:59 am ET)
            7 1
            This has got to be the funniest thing I have ever seen.

            An implication you're not getting from the clip is the funniest thing you've ever seen?
            Nobody tell the troll why the chicken crossed the road; he'll go into cardiac arrest.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (August 23, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
              6 1
              Soze, if you're having trouble making sense of the comments by the Beck fanboys, I have a little insight into it, as I listended to a few minutes of beck driving into work this morning.

              Beck played a little of the audio, up to the point where he said "Sure, sure". He and his morning zoo dimwits then built a series of increasingly ridiculous strawmen, sarcastically saying that MMFA had proved that Beck supports terrorist/was in fact a Muslim, etc. This was in between long bouts of fake LOL-ing.

              Mainiac and highliter were told by Glen that this was the funniest thing they've ever heard.

              He effectively distracted them from the fact that he was sitting down having a conversation with a man who, as he admitted on his radio show today, he knew nothing about in 2006, while at the same time pretending to be some sort of authority on Islam.

              The Beck groupies aren't supposed to notice that, while Beck hasn't demonstrated that he has learned any more about Rauf in the last four years, Rauf has gone from a fellow guest on a tv show to Evil Incarnate.

              Sometimes the wingnuts miss the humor in items here at MMFA. I don't see this as any sort of condemnation of Nostradumbass for being in the same room as Rauf, that woould only occur to the bogots pre-conditioned to think that was a possibility ( Beck Audience).

              It's more of a lightweight item showing another example of Beck's ignorance and phoniness. It's also a good opportunity for the people who listen to beck to volunteer to show how easily manipulated they are.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by coldteablues19577325 (August 23, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
            7 1
            "Just because he appeared with him on the same show means nothing." --highliter

            And how about those few that then Senator Obama served on committees with? Seems that right-wingers consider his having done so make him guilty by association. Sheesh.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (August 23, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
              1 7
              You’re seriously trying to compare sitting on a committee and visiting their homes to a 10 min guest spot on a TV show.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
                4  
                What was the discussion about that the Iman and Beck was discussing. Were they disagreeing or agreeing with each other?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 3:45 pm ET)
                5  
                You want to play this guilt by association game I got two names for you Elizabeth Dilling,C.W.Skousen.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 23, 2010 3:51 pm ET)
                6  
                Yes . . . both are just as ludicrous. However, that's not really what this is about. It's about Beck's hypocrisy. When the good Imam was an emissary of the previous administration, he was a "good Muslim." Now, he's a TUR-IST!

                If the folks on Fox told you that the Sun will now be rising in the West and setting in the East, you'd believe them and repeat it as fact.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Quixote (August 23, 2010 10:53 am ET)
      7 1
      No problem for Beck. He'll just go back in time and say that Rauf is evil on tape and the MM will look silly for posting such a story that the tape doesn't corroborate. Or he'll declare that day in '06 Opposite Day, so what he really said was that Rauf is actually an evil Muslim.

      That's what he does best you know.... revise history.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jollymon (August 23, 2010 11:05 am ET)
        7 2
        Actually the Beckster will probably say he was only being polite because there was a good chance Rauf had a bomb strapped to him and would detonate if he heard anything derogatory, so Beckie played it safe and implied Rauf was a good Muslim.

        Either that or he was protected by the raw bacon he always keeps in his pockets so he was being nice.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MaineiacMan (August 23, 2010 11:30 am ET)
        3 12
        I doubt he knew ANYTHING about him in 2006.

        Does this mean that the new standard of endorsement is saying "sure, sure" or even "yes, yes" or "right, right" to a question when it is asked?

        If so, Obama must be in agreement with almost every question he is asked.

        This style of "gotcha advocacy" (I cant even call it journalism) is getting pathetic. A few weeks ago MM4A had to amend a posting because they only used a portion of the tape, changing its context (common error at MM4A).

        Shirley Sherrod was told to resign because she was going to be on Glenn Beck....when he hadnt even discussed her to that point.

        I have NEVER seen a headline so big on HuffPo! For this? Keep it up, you are exposing yourselves.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jollymon (August 23, 2010 11:45 am ET)
          7  
          Yes, I agree it is a bit of a weak headline/story. Good journalism is pretty much dead in America. But this is MMFA. Do you expect them to actually praise anything Beck would say or put him in a positive light? You are about as likely to find a positive liberal story on Fox. It's what this site does, and you are upset by that? Where have you been?!?

          However, we are talking about Captain Contradiction here, so I don't see a problem pointing out yet another change/flop in Beck's ADD views of the world and the people in it. Beck does it to others every chance he gets. It goes both ways bright one.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by cindermaker (August 23, 2010 11:15 am ET)
      5 2
      Oh Media Matters, I love you for this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 11:47 am ET)
      5 1
      Great find MMFA. Glenn Beck exposed as hyprocrite,great. Beckheads rushing to his defense priceless.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cann0nba11 (August 23, 2010 2:22 pm ET)
        3 8
        Where are all of you people when Obama is exposed as legitimately lying, twisting, distorting or flip-flopping? Beck is a talking head, Obama is leading the friggin' country. The hypocrisy and willful ignorance around here is stunning.

        I know, I know. I disagree, there fore L]let the troll comments begin. SO predictable.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
          4  
          You disagree with what?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 3:43 pm ET)
          3  
          You disagree with what?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mescal (August 23, 2010 7:38 pm ET)
            4  
            He doesn't know, but... damn it... we're picking on poor Dreckie again, and... and... and what about Obama... and the New World Order, and stuff?

            YOU GUYS AREN'T FAIR!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (August 23, 2010 9:34 pm ET)
              3  
              He did work in a completely unsupported and bizarre use of the word "hypocrisy", though, so he gets his Wingnut merit badge for the day.

              Never forget to add " hypocrisy!!", wingnuts, no matter how little sense it makes.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by MiniTru (August 24, 2010 8:19 am ET)
            2  
            You disagree with what?
            cann0nba11 disagrees with reality, for the most part.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (August 23, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
          6  
          Where are all of you people when Obama is exposed as legitimately lying, twisting, distorting or flip-flopping?


          Please enumerate.

          I have my problems with Obama, and he wasn't my choice, but I'd like you to post links and information to support your claims. I've seen folks like you say this, but you never post evidence. EVER.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (August 23, 2010 5:14 pm ET)
            4  
            Maybe this time, bintx. Don't hold your breath.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by doughpro1604643 (August 23, 2010 8:04 pm ET)
            1 4
            Look at his list of campaign promises and you will hit a gold mine.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by politeradical (August 23, 2010 9:36 pm ET)
              3 1
              Most legitimate gripes with his campaign promises were in the category of promising things he had no power to deliver on:

              -bipartisanship - this obviously requires cooperation on both sides. Despite his request for republican input, the response was a lock step middle finger from the right. Without their participation, the promise failed through no fault of Obama's own.

              -health insurance reform negotiations on CSPAN - again a foolish promise since he couldn't deliver it without Congress' approval.

              -post-racial, post-partisan - idealistic but undeliverable. Mudslinging from the right and it's media lapdogs has seen to that.

              -stimulus package- promise kept

              -health insurance reform - promise kept even if not perfect, they got the best bill they could through congress

              -recommitting to Afghanistan - promise kept

              -ending the war in Iraq - promise kept

              -no lobbyists - an idealistic but impractical promise as the administration had difficulty obtaining the best people without relaxing the rule
              ______________________

              So what do we have? Two major legislative victories and a foreign policy perfectly inline with his campaign rhetoric. Along with a few swing-for-the-fences claims that weren't in his power to give.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by doughpro1604643 (August 24, 2010 9:12 am ET)
                  2
                Just as I expected, nothing but excuses and lame justification. Excuses are like a-holes, especially in this case. He lied through his teeth, plain and simple, to get elected. He hit every talking point, every soft spot that people were concerned with. "It's the economy, stupid", and everybody thought that he was going to miraculously fix it. He has no clue how to fix it, and we all know how well his "real" policies are working...
                You can't blame the reps for lack of bipartinship. Have you forgotten how many closed-door meetings that he held where no reps were invited? A simple vote "no" on legislation that they don't agree with is not them "standing in the way", it is them doing their job as requested by their constituents.
                It would have been a lot easier if he had just campaigned on bigger government, and government takeovers of private sector businesses, right?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (August 24, 2010 11:40 am ET)
                  2 1
                  You know when you have to distort someones post in order to make your point it shows you don't have a point to make. You then follow your lie about what blitzd posted with nothing more than Faux News drivel. do you ever think for yourself?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mescal (August 25, 2010 1:08 am ET)
                    2  
                    Has anyone here EVER seen doughpro post a non-doctrinaire right wing thought? Has anyone here ever seen him fail to rigidly toe the wingnut line. He frequently calls President Obama a liar, but never cites the lie. Doughpro is a living, typing regurgitation machine: a trained and heavily conditioned pack member who drools and growls whenever his xenophobic, right wing media masters ring his response bell.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by highlyunlikely (August 23, 2010 6:00 pm ET)
          4 1
          I'll tell you when it happens.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Quixote (August 23, 2010 12:04 pm ET)
      10 2
      Rauf has a profound depth of understanding of the complexities and troubled history of world Islam relations with the West that Gleck doesn't even begin to grasp. Actually, this clip serves as a perfect example of how the mainstream network media tries to present both sides, even if they are completely unmatched in intellect, sophistication and legitimacy.

      I mean please, how pray tell is Gleck any sort of expert on anything, much less, Muslim theology and the history of West/Muslim relations?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jollymon (August 23, 2010 12:21 pm ET)
        11 1
        Hey! Give him some credit! Beck is an expert chalkboard drawer-on-er and making random "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon" ties between people/companies/community organizations. He is also astonishling adept at being a raving, bipolar, apocalyptic, Naziturrets lunatic at times.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cann0nba11 (August 23, 2010 2:20 pm ET)
      3 8
      Here's something that might shock you: People are allowed to change their minds when new information makes it logical to do so. I doubt Beck knew much about Rauf four years ago.

      I don't think that's a matter of lying, it is a matter of education.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jollymon (August 23, 2010 2:56 pm ET)
        5 2
        Ummmm, you are saying Beck is able to become educated? The same guy who the other night said Darwin was the "father of modern day racism?" Yeah riiiiiight!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (August 23, 2010 3:54 pm ET)
        5 2
        MMFA knows you very well this from the article above.

        Beck's response to this -- if he bothers to respond at all -- will likely be that when this segment was filmed, he was unaware of the supposed "radical" beliefs of Rauf. However as we (and Jon Stewart) have pointed out, Rauf's statements about 9-11 that Beck and others have pointed to as evidence of his hatred of America and sympathy for terrorism track very closely with things many conservatives -- including Glenn Beck himself - have said.---MMFA

        Care to explain how Beck views about 9/11 differ from Iman Rauf or I'd bet you just rather go on about us "libruls."

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 23, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
        6 1
        When Beck was speaking to him 4 years ago, the imam was working for the Bush administration as an emissary to the Muslim world. That's why he was on Beck's program. Apparently, he was an okay guy then. Nice try, though.

        BTW, I do agree with your last statement. Beck is an uneducated, dishonest, con-man. If you believe any of his crap, you're in really bad shape.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (August 23, 2010 5:17 pm ET)
        4 1
        People are allowed to change their minds when new information makes it logical to do so



        Yeah, you guys sure had a handle on that with John Kerry's "I was for the 87 billion..."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jms (August 23, 2010 5:54 pm ET)
      3 4
      sure, sure. That's it?????? LMFAO.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave (August 23, 2010 9:17 pm ET)
      5 5
      Beck appeared to call Imam Rauf a "good Muslim"

      I didn't hear that. Did anyone?

      It was a so so interview, but because Beck didn't reach over the table and smack him, he's a good Muslim?

      They were both nice to each other is all I witnessed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiniTru (August 24, 2010 8:23 am ET)
        3  
        I didn't hear that. Did anyone?
        Yes, I did. But I listened to the full clip, not just the part that Beck aired on his show.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Space-Pedestrian (August 24, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
      2 3
      Ever wonder?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MaineiacMan (August 26, 2010 7:00 am ET)
         
      Hey MM4A,

      Please explain your 2006 response to this interview vs. your 2010 explanation. They kind of fly in the face of each other. You are not a media watchdog organization. Can you say "playing politics"? Can you say "manipulation"? You are a political agenda organization plain and simple.
      Report Abuse