Will the next Ronald Reagan please stand up?
September 01, 2010 12:13 am ET by Mike Burns
In an August 31 Washington Times editorial, former Reagan administration official and Heritage Foundation writer James T. Hackett attempted to remedy what has so far eluded conservatives - finding "a new Ronald Reagan." His suggested "heir" to "the Gipper's" throne? Sarah Palin, who has been nominated for the role in the past by Ann Coulter and Richard A. Viguerie.
Now, you would think that conservative media would approach labeling individuals "the next Ronald Reagan" the same way they purport to approach most things - with a "less is more" attitude. This is, after all, the Ronald Reagan, an iconic right-wing hero. Sadly, however, this is not the case. Observe:
- Earlier today, Fox Nation featured the headline: Christie's Starting to Look Like Reagan" and accompanied the headline with the following image:

- In a February 27 article on American Thinker, Bruce Walker wrote that "One Republican in 2008 met all those criteria, and in 2012, he stands out at least as clearly as anyone as our Next Reagan: Fred Thompson." Walker noted the "remarkable similarity in the lives of these two men," adding that Thompson fits Reagan's "role perfectly."
- According to a September 14, 2009 post at The American Spectator headlined "The Next Reagan? Maybe," candidate for Governor of California Meg Whitman has the potential to be "the next Reagan" because "she has clear convictions" and "the determination to carry them out against ... state government," as well as "the optimistic, sunny personality needed to roll with the punches."
- In an October 21, 2007 National Ledger column, Accuracy in Media's Cliff Kincaid offered Mike Huckabee as the next potential Reagan, arguing that Huckabee was "demonstrating that he has the Reagan vision" by "denouncing the Law of the Sea Treaty."
- Right-wing radio host Neal Boortz wrote on his website, "I truly believe that Rubio could very well be the next Ronald Reagan for the GOP. Democrats believe that too ... that's why they're pulling out all the stops to derail him."
- As documented by the blog Think Progress, Rush Limbaugh has repeatedly referred to Gov. Bobby Jindal (R-LA) as "the next Ronald Reagan," adding that Jindal represents "100% conservatism."
Considering that most rising conservative figures are compared to Reagan by their counterparts in the media, maybe the question isn't who is "the next Ronald Reagan," but who isn't it?

















Calling that guy an empty suit is an insult to empty suits.
Since you've been around for years defending the previous administration's tax cuts, deregulation, unnecessary wars and financial policies, don't try placing all of the blame of the current occupant of the White House until you accept the fact, that you were wrong to defend the policies of the Republican clown and chair moistener who sat in the Oval office.
If Reagan were running for President in 2012, he wouldn't get the nomination from the republican party. No way. No how. They would probably be calling him a RINO, and the Tea Party wouldn't like him.
How they fail to see what Reagan did, and or believed in. It's funny.
Actually, I disagree. Reagan was a party of no mentality.
I never saw the cheerful, sunny, smiling Reagan that everyone seems to remember. I saw a mean old cuss who knew exactly the kinds of thugs and butchers he was supporting in Central America.
Source
IMO - Goldwater had faults, but he was a principled conservative, and would lambast these idiots.
Pitiful.
Remember, old white presidents can do no wrong. Even if they sell weapons to the guys who more-or-less popularized the "Death to America" chant.