About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Sharron Angle brags about her fundraising from "friendly" outlets like Fox News

September 22, 2010 11:28 am ET by Eric Hananoki

As journalist Jon Ralston noted, Nevada Republican U.S. Senate candidate Sharron Angle bragged to supporters that her appearances on a "friendly press outlet" like Fox News are profitable. As an example, Angle said that when she made an appeal on "Sean Hannity's television show we made $40,000 before we even got out of the studio in New York."

From a transcript of Angle posted on Ralston's blog (audio here):

Guest: Sharron, how are you doing as far as the fundraising?

Sharron Angle: It's going really well. If you're interested in just the Internet part of that -- and of course I've been criticized for saying that I like to be friends with the [press] -- but here's the deal: when I get a friendly press outlet -- not so much the guy that's interviewing me -- it's their audience that I'm trying to reach. So, if I can get on Rush Limbaugh, and I can say, "Harry Reid needs $25 million. I need a million people to send twenty five dollars to SharronAngle.com." The day I was able to say that [even], he made $236,000 dollars. That's why it's so important. Somebody...I'm going on Bill O'Reilly the 16th. They say, "Bill O'Reilly, you better watch out for that guy, he's not necessarily a friendly"...Doesn't matter, his audience is friendly, and if I can get an opportunity to say that at least once on his show -- when I said it on Sean Hannity's television show we made $40,000 before we even got out of the studio in New York. It was just [great]. So that's what I'm really reaching out to is that audience that's had it with Harry, and you can watch that happen when I go on those shows. Go on my website, it starts coming in. We have an automatic...when you put your name in there and it doesn't tell how much you gave, but it tells your name and where you're from. And so you can just watch it; it just rolls like this. In fact, with Rush Limbaugh we put it all down. We couldn't take the ticker going fast enough. And we've pulled in over [3,000,000] dollars just from that kind of a message going out.

Angle has been fairly consistent in touting Fox News as part of her national fundraising push. On September 10, Angle wrote that she would appear on Fox News' Hannity as "part of our push" to raise $1 million online; she previously told Fox News reporter Carl Cameron that she needed the press to be her "friend" and allow her to give out the address of her website; and in July, Angle suggested that she frequently appeared on Fox News -- the home of softball Angle interviews -- because they allow her to make fundraising appeals to viewers.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by txthinker (September 22, 2010 11:45 am ET)
      12  
      I hope someone at the Federal Election Commission is reading this thread.......
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (September 22, 2010 11:49 am ET)
        10  
        Me, too. Doesn't matter which "side" is doing this, it's wrong. Mainly because Fox is presenting itself as a news agency when it, quite obviously and blatantly, is not.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (September 22, 2010 11:55 am ET)
      7  
      I know it isn't ethical for a news organization to raise funds for a candidate, but is it illegal? I knew of a radio station that lost its license because it endorsed a candidate back in the 1960s, it took ten years to go through the courts, but the station was forced off the air. How is this legal? How can any Fox journalist be complicit and still consider themselves legitimate?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CrashGordon (September 22, 2010 12:00 pm ET)
        8  
        They know they aren't legitimate. But they also know that being a journalist isn't their primary job. They work for the Republican party and they know it. It's just icing on the cake that they get to enjoy journalistic privileges in the process.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (September 22, 2010 12:10 pm ET)
        8  
        I knew of a radio station that lost its license because it endorsed a candidate back in the 1960s, it took ten years to go through the courts, but the station was forced off the air.
        Back in the 1960s, radio stations were still operating under the Fairness Doctrine. I guess that's what they used as grounds for revoking that station's license.

        The Fairness Doctrine went away under Reagan, so it no longer applies. However, there are rules and regulations as to how much an individual or corporation can contribute to a specific political campaign. And all the free advertising Faux News is providing to GOP politicians like Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell represents a defacto campaign contribution.

        This needs to be investigated.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (September 22, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
          7  
          I'm sure that's why Faux has such a hatred for it and bashes it evey chance it gets. They know they would not be able to operate. The Fairness Doctrine lasted for nearly 40 years, if journalists and stations could last for so long (whole careers, really) under the constraints, why can't this current crop? I forget, a lot of them were chosen for their looks and not their ability to write or report, they just have to look good reading copy. (And this is true for more than just Faux Noise.)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (September 22, 2010 12:09 pm ET)
      8  
      If the FCC goes after Fox then they'll cry that the FCC is a liberal agency trying to silence free speech, etc. Hannity will then do hour long specials on how the liberals at the FCC are tied to Obama, Ayers, Wright, Van Jones, etc.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by David2012 (September 22, 2010 12:13 pm ET)
        7  
        And the ghost of Woodrow Wilson.

        No, wait, that's Beck.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (September 22, 2010 1:38 pm ET)
        5  
        Mayube not the FCC, but the FEC needs to look in to the way that faux News is providing financial benefit to dozens of Republican races.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cpinva (September 22, 2010 3:01 pm ET)
          5  
          that's kind of what i was thinking too. her appearances on the FOX network constitute campaign commercials, complete with pleas for donations from the audience. i'm no lawyer (and i don't play one on tv), but i would think this would constitute in-kind contributions by FOX, but never reported by either FOX, or the angle campaign.
          Report Abuse