About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

ABC News and Breitbart are now at war

November 01, 2010 1:06 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

It's not like we don't try to warn people. 

It's not like Media Matters hasn't meticulously detailed the way Andrew Breitbart routinely wrestles with the truth and loses. We've made it plain to anyone who's interested that Breitbart is a propagandist, plain and simple. Worse, he's a propagandist who invents smears and malicious attacks against innocent targets. (Paging Shirley Sherrod.) And he does it all in the name of partisan gain, as well as his own self-aggrandizement. 

In other words, he's not a political player who should be taken seriously by professional journalists. And he's certainly not somebody who the press should, in any way, attempt to legitimize or mainstream simply because his track record of deceit has been so prominently marked and footnoted. 

And yet for some reason ABC News thought it would be a good idea to reach out to Breitbart and include him in its Election Night coverage. (Was James O'Keefe not available?) It was a preposterous move and one that has led to a multitude of black-eyes, like when Sherrod attorney's likened Breitbart's ABC invitation to "rewarding a Klansman -- giving a Klansman an award for burning a cross on Shirley Sherrod's house." The chronic disgust that greeted ABC's staffing decision forced the network to try to publicly distance itself from Breitbart, stressing that he was only going to contributed to ABC's online coverage. 

But now, in an utterly predictable twist, the brawling has become internal, as it were, with Breitbart battling ABC reps over what exactly his role will be and what he claims it was supposed to be. (He's published private emails to state his case.)

That's right, ABC is now publicly feuding with one of its soon-to-be guests, with Breitbart claiming ABC execs lied about what their plans were for him on Election Night, and ABC responding that it's Breitbart who's confused about what the emails said and what his participation was supposed to be. So yes, the obvious question arises: If ABC doesn't think Breitbart can read emails, why do they want him to comment on Tuesday night's election results?  

It's a wild, ugly spectacle for ABC News. And like I said, it's not like we didn't try to warn them: When you lay down with Breitbart, you're gonna get fleas. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by epkklk851 (November 01, 2010 1:13 pm ET)
      13  
      Well, it couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Now, maybe ABC will remember the traditions of Frank Reynolds and Howard K. Smith and drop this terd back into the toilet he crept out of.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (November 01, 2010 11:20 pm ET)
        1  
        While I never would have used that term to describe Breitbart, I can second your statement. This guy seems to have no insight as to when it is better to just fold and go home. This deal on ABC will graphically illustrate what scum Breitbart is. He is now devoid of credibilty because he tried to justify his disgusting behavior. He has no integrity since he simply shredded any smidgeon of integrity he MAY have had. If he were smart, he would just slink off and get his life and values straightened out. Because now, he is known worldwide as a chronic liar. However, ABC is not looking all that good either. Obviously THEY invited this creep and alas, the public creamed them for making nice with this chronic liar. It was well known that Breitbart totally lied and of all things doctored a script about Shirley Sherrod (sp). So add to his many disgusting traits, he picks on women and he is a first class racist!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Floyd (November 02, 2010 7:59 am ET)
          1
        Don't forget the traditions of Dan Rather. Perhaps ABC has their own version of 'creating facts' like Dan Rather did. Besides, mmfa just said that "professional journalists" shouldn't take the guy seriously, so I doubt anyone that you mentioned would care about Andrew. That could be why mmfa has such extensive coverage of the guy ... they aren't professional journalists.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Invent a Scandal (November 01, 2010 1:19 pm ET)
      9  
      Darn it! I hate to see conservatives squabbling among themselves!!

      They're usually such nice little tirds.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 01, 2010 2:40 pm ET)
        6  
        Darn it! I hate to see conservatives squabbling among themselves!! Examples: Sarah Palin and Karl Rove, LOL.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (November 01, 2010 1:25 pm ET)
      8 1
      Ya gotta laugh.
      (Fortunately I'm far enough away from the consequences of this folly, but hopefully it will be a salutary lesson for the "shiny bums" who confuse volume of noise with journalistic legitimacy)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mattcable250650 (November 01, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
      13 1
      ABC News gets absolutely zero sympathy from me. My very, very strong suspicion is that Breitbart is 100% correct and that the corporate "suits" are frantically trying to cover over their own miserably poor judgment for having asked him to join their crew in the first place.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 01, 2010 2:47 pm ET)
        7 1
        I agree with you 100% - wink, wink - LOL.

        ABC Sutis knew what they were doing by hiring this guy 'cause he is 100% legitimate as an "un-bias" Political Analyst who would "NEVER" pal around with James O'Keefe in America. Uh, oh. LOL.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rtejon (November 01, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
        4  
        I think their first impulse was to "compete" with other networks' panels of useless pundits by hiring their own.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ponymeup (November 01, 2010 10:19 pm ET)
        2  
        My first reaction was to say that you are correct and that ABC just took a couple of huge stupid pills every four to six hours for a day or two. Then it dawned on me that Mr. Breitbart is not exactly a rookie when it comes to editing things to his liking. 50/50 on this one. Either way ABC has to really be considering "WTF" they were thinking to begin with. I mean there are only 100 or so people to choose from with better political cred than this bozo. Don't ya think?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 01, 2010 1:30 pm ET)
      19 1
      I'm ever amazed at how the "Liberal Media" keeps bending over backward to avoid accusations of "Liberal Bias" from the Troglodytes. Why are they so cowed by these paid propagandists?

      Don't they get it? The lying bastards on FOX and Hate Radio will vilify them NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO! That being the case, they might as well exhibit a little bit of spine and stand up for journalistic integrity.

      Kissing the butts of Troglodytes like Britefart only brings them grief. One would think they'd eventually figure this out.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neilrmurray8125 (November 01, 2010 2:53 pm ET)
           
        When the Right was attacking NPR years ago and trying to de-fund it, I thought the best strategy for NPR would be to absolutely NOT give any news, none what-so-ever, or publicity, to the Right, including the Reps and Senators who were attacking their funding. They, of course, being spineless, took the opposite course and gave more attention to the Bully Boys and Goils of the Right.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (November 01, 2010 7:30 pm ET)
        5  
        I think that President Obama is finally learning the same lesson.

        I sure hope so, anyway.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by stullivan (November 01, 2010 1:35 pm ET)
      8  
      To sum up each side's position:

      AB - I am a new media titan with "Big" websites and my investigative journalism has uncovered the stories "tradiiontal" lmestream media won't cover. I'm important because no one was talking about Shirley Sherrod, or ACORN until I came along. I was asked to headline all of ABC's election night commentary and oversee web content. Disrespected and silenced by Soro's media elite enforcers.

      ABC - we asked this guy to sit in a online/live town hall that we potentially could cut to during election coverage and MAYBE someone, james okeefe or Andrew's family, could catch a second of his inflated ego in the background. There is no Wucking Fay this guy was going to actually contribute or "do" anything substantial - kind of like his current work.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 01, 2010 2:50 pm ET)
        4  
        Excellent points, especially the "NO" Wucking Fay - wink, wink - LOL.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by grmce (November 01, 2010 7:45 pm ET)
          3  
          As my good friend Ken Noath, a renouned spoonerist, would say, "No wucks" short for "No wuckin' furries".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (November 01, 2010 1:35 pm ET)
      9  
      To paraphrase a famous quote from Marx (errr, Groucho Marx) why would Breitbart want to be a part of a news organization that would have him as a member?

      Seems like a good time for both side to call this whole ridiculous thing off.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (November 01, 2010 1:53 pm ET)
        8  
        This is so shameful. The whole sorry mess. It would be nice for more rational heads to prevail, but alas Breitbart and the trogs will ride this pony for all the sympathy it's worth. They'll scream bloody murder and cry that their voice has been stymied. That the big bad lamestream media is biased agin' them, even though Breitbart's journalistic "skills" are patently only of the self serving and insignificant variety.

        Scoundrels all! I'd personally like to kick the ass of whoever made the suggestion to have this eejit on board for their coverage. And I'd personally like to kick the ass of Andrew Breitbart if I didn't think he'd cry all over me in his titty ass whiny baby voice. I just hate shrill and crybaby men! Ladies too for that matter! ;-0)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (November 01, 2010 4:18 pm ET)
          6  
          What a strange animal!

          A sympathy pony. If not raised properly, it could grow up to be a hate horse.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (November 01, 2010 4:50 pm ET)
            5  
            We're living in the bizarro world end times whereby a hate horse can be made into a sympathy pony if you kick, scream, whine, make racists assertions (and pin racism on the person receiving your racist invective) and otherwise make an unmitigated horsey's ass of yourself. ;-0)
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (November 01, 2010 11:34 pm ET)
          1  
          We can thank Sarah sweetie for all these silly euphemism that describe the far right "lamestream" media. This entire episode is another graphic illustration of her point. Of course she labeled the wrong group lamestream, but her statement was sort of correct, well totally opposite from correct really. But alas, every time she opens her mouth to discuss the "lamestream" media, she graphically illustrates just how lame stream the media can get for those far right folks in our party. It is like they are tone deaf to the destruction and mayhem they are pushing onto our Party. Soon, and very soon I mean, it will be entirely too embarrassing to say "I am a Republican". But I am old as dirt and I was a member of our party long ago so if anyone leaves it will not be me. But I intend to call our these nuts in our party every time they open their racist mouths.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by tbone (November 01, 2010 1:56 pm ET)
        9  
        ABC will bail before Breitbart. If you watch Andy on the air, he really believes he's a journalist. As opposed to his "Big", when a legitimate "Big" media player like ABC comes calling, he is delusional enough to think he's a parity member of the club. What I find amazing is how badly ABC got played - like Eric B. says, they were warned.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 01, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
        5  
        why would Breitbart want to be a part of a news organization that would have him as a member?

        Answer: 'Cause FoxNews, the #1 Republican Tea Party Cable Channel, booked too many of their Republican Tea Party Candidates and therefore FoxNews had to DROP Breitbart quickly, LOL.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by boulderhippy (November 01, 2010 1:46 pm ET)
      1 25
      If he were as prolific at smearing as you say he is, why isn't there more than one person you point out in your never ending attack?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (November 01, 2010 1:47 pm ET)
        13  
        Wow, you do have a very compartmentalized brain, don't you?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by vysotsky (November 01, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
        12 1
        Didn't actually click on that link, now, did you?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Porkeater (November 01, 2010 1:56 pm ET)
        10 1
        never ending attack

        Yeh, poor Barty! He would never edit the truth to make somebody look bad, would he? Poor little victim, eh?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by RumpshakerSlim (November 01, 2010 1:58 pm ET)
        12 1
        "Hi, I'm Boulderhippy. I don't remember who Shirly Sherrod is. I also forgot the phony ACORN tapes, and Brietbart trying to push O'Keefe's bogus Census expose. Maybe I should stop doing drugs, but then I wouldn't be a hippy."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by einreb (November 01, 2010 3:20 pm ET)
          8 1
          "Hi, I'm boulderhippy. I'm a fiscal conservative who won't explain how my fav President and entire Republican party could claim to be the same and yet authorize a one trillion dollar war of choice off the books.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by sharpshooter57 (November 01, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
          11
        Really, do you think they would mention say Ed Schultz on MSNBC? Never gonna happen lol, yet they will put somebody up like Michael Moore and say his documentaries are factual and true.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CriticallyCorrect (November 01, 2010 9:17 pm ET)
             
          Ed Schultz is an HONEST liberal radio and TV show host. He is not a journalist. The only "journalism" of note produced by DISHONEST Breitbart has proved to be wholly without basis in fact: eg, the tape of ACORN, the laughable tape of Census workers, tape of Sherrod, and the anticipated tape of Senator Landrieu, never made because O'Keefe got arrested and prosecuted for breaking into a federal building. When investigated, all tapes proved to be heavily doctored and edited down precisely to produce phony negative pictures. Latest Breitbart fake project has been to produce inaudible voicemail tape of discussion by CBS affiliate of Miller campaign problems, which was cut entirely out of context in order to distort meaning. Academy Award winner Michael Moore readily admits that he creates scenes intended to emphasize liberal points of view and show irony in his satirical documentary films. He is lauded as a liberal populist activist filmmaker, who, because of his well-known liberal views, would be least likely chosen to be a commentator covering election. Your shooting is way off mark.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by highlyunlikely (November 01, 2010 4:21 pm ET)
        7  
        aw, look at that. Somebody actually defended Breitbart. He had to resort to lies to do it, but at least he tried.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CriticallyCorrect (November 01, 2010 7:54 pm ET)
           
        Breitbart is best known for pushing a tape that supposedly showed an ACORN employee helping a pimp and prostitute to establish a brothel, which drove the smear campaign that eventually brought down the respected community organization. Independent investigations later found the tapes to be heavily edited and the storyline that Breitbart pushed to be opposite the truth. Breitbart’s smear of ACORN helped to propel the right-wing media’s current fixation on the discredited fear of “voter fraud” resulting from minority voting.

        Breitbart is currently engaged in another false media campaign in Alaska, where he has accused a local CBS affiliate of concocting a plot against Senate candidate Joe Miller--but the only evidence he has been able to produce is a fuzzy audio clip that hardly substantiates his claim.

        Breitbart has a reputation of never-ending intentional dishonesty and making up "facts" in order to paint the left as evil to distract from the everyday evil malpractices of the right (Fox News, Glen Beck, Rushbo hate-filled false propaganda, which used to air Breitbart's stuff; McConnell; Boehner; Cantor; Miller; Sarah Palin . . . the right wingnuts).

        It is amazing you could be oblivious to Breitbart's notoriously wretched character and that you have been taken in by him (unless you are a Fox News simpleton and ditto-head).

        Report Abuse
    • Author by fredyt123 (November 01, 2010 2:24 pm ET)
         
      ABC is pulling a slight of hands hustle. On one front they say he is not part of program......but on the other their press release clearly states he is a "guest" so most would assume he is part of the lineup (in person or virtual).
      I would encourage you to contact ABC News Chief David Westin and voice your outrage 212-456-7777 option 1 will place you in to the operator and simply ask for David Westin's office.
      If Brietbart somehow is on the lineup, we will immediately boycott Disney and ABC.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bill Wilson (November 01, 2010 2:26 pm ET)
      7 1
      AN open letter to ABC News (in part because their "contact us" page only allows 500 characters... gee, it sounds like they really want substantive dialogue)

      Dear ABC News:

      PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not let Brietbart manipulate you. While the wisdom of you letting him associate with you at all is highly questionable (he is not a “conservative” but rather an inflammatory, sensationalistic, fear-mongering hack… George Will is a conservative), he is now trying to work his magic by creating a win-win situation for himself. If you don’t let him on-air, then you’re the corrupt liberal media (which deliberately and conveniently ignores that George Will plays a very prominent role on your network) and if you let him on, then of course you’ve allowed him to spread his corrupt, inflammatory message. Be strong. Stand by your standards, principles, etc. Do not fall into the same trap as the rest of the media, which in the fear of being labeled “liberal” or “biased” will bend over backwards to convince people otherwise (Fox News deserves a shot at the front row of the WH Briefing room, Juan Williams was unfairly fired from NPR, etc.) which actually leads to the meida in country tilting to the right amazingly.

      And if you’re just in it for the money, then disassociate yourself from him completely and bring on a liberal commentator who will rail against him, which will provide the “sizzle” I suspect you may be looking for.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bill Wilson (November 01, 2010 2:29 pm ET)
      5 1
      An open letter to ABC News (in part because their "contact us" page only allows 500 characters... gee, it sounds like they really want substantive dialogue)

      Dear ABC News:

      PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not let Brietbart manipulate you. While the wisdom of you letting him associate with you at all is highly questionable (he is not a "conservative" but rather an inflammatory, sensationalistic, fear-mongering hack; George Will is a conservative), he is now trying to work his magic by creating a win-win situation for himself. If you don't let him on-air, then you're the corrupt liberal media (which deliberately and conveniently ignores that George Will plays a very prominent role on your network) and if you let him on, then of course you've allowed him to spread his corrupt, inflammatory message. Be strong. Stand by your standards, principles, etc. Do not fall into the same trap as the rest of the media, which in the fear of being labeled "liberal" or "biased" will bend over backwards to convince people otherwise (Fox News deserves a shot at the front row of the WH Briefing room, Juan Williams was unfairly fired from NPR, etc.) which actually leads to the meida in country tilting to the right amazingly.

      And if you're just in it for the money, then disassociate yourself from him completely and bring on a liberal commentator who will rail against him, which will provide the "sizzle" I suspect you may be looking for.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by SuznAZ (November 01, 2010 2:57 pm ET)
         
      Doesn't matter who is "right"...as long as ABC listens to those complaining about Breitbart's inclusion, realizes they need to mitigate the potential damage. This creature is the poster child for what is wrong in American politics. His comments about Saturday's Rally to Restore Sanity included the view that it was all just liberal elitists looking down their noses at conservatives. Geesh, talk about turning lemonade into lemons.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by einreb (November 01, 2010 3:04 pm ET)
      5  
      I sent a letter to ABC News division on Saturday night, protesting the addition of Breitbarf to the ABC coverage. You will all be pleased to know that because of MY LETTER, this entire agreement has unravelled.

      Well, OK, maybe not. But I really did send it and remain plenty piffed off that ABC News even considered using this jackwagon for anything more than holding the door open for real journalists.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by txthinker (November 01, 2010 3:07 pm ET)
      5 1
      When you lay down with Breitbart, you're gonna get fleas.
      And worse...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by isaacblack (November 01, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
         
      "And yet for some reason ABC News thought it would be a good idea to reach out to Breitbart and include him in its Election Night coverage. (Was James O'Keefe not available?) It was a preposterous move and one that has led to a multitude of black-eyes, like when Sherrod attorney's likened Breitbart's ABC invitation to "rewarding a Klansman -- giving a Klansman an award for burning a cross on Shirley Sherrod's house."

      Yes, this is that incredible non-biased reporting at media-matters. Using Shirley, "I could tell he was being superior to me" Sherrod's attorney, who calls Breitbart a Klansman. Oh by the way, Shirley's family got close to $1 million from the Govt. for the money her family supposedly was cheated out of.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by isaacblack (November 01, 2010 4:15 pm ET)
         
      This sight is great. Have you not noticed there is not one single dissenting opinion on this sight. This is because they are all screened out, just like Huffington post. You editors much be like, gee I went to school, aren't we supposed to have a lively debate? "No wait, Mr. Soros says the more dissenting opinions I delete the hire my bonus. This is the easiest money I ever got to buy pot with".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie294 (November 01, 2010 5:57 pm ET)
      4  
      Thank you Mr. Soros for funding this fine organization, Media Matters! Keep up the great work, MMFA! If I had a spare million, it would be yours!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by map106 (November 01, 2010 7:48 pm ET)
        6
      No matter how much money Soros has allegedly given you, you still don't know how to write.

      "And he's certainly not somebody who the press should, in any way, attempt to legitimize or mainstream ..."

      It's "whom" the press should... The press is the subject of the clause, Breitbart the object. The press should (not) attempt to legitimize WHOM.

      "When you lay down with Breitbart, you're gonna get fleas."

      My mother/teacher is rolling over in her grave. It's when you LIE down with Breitbart... Lie means to rest or recline: it's lie, lay, lain. Lay means to place or put: it's lay, laid, laid.

      That any of you should be given the right to discuss our discourse is frightening. The blind and stupid leading the blind and stupid.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie294 (November 01, 2010 7:53 pm ET)
        4  
        The last refuge of people without a valid argument is grammar and spelling. Congratulations, buddy! You win!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by einreb (November 01, 2010 10:30 pm ET)
        3  
        Brilliant political analysis map 106. Even though you have no idea what you're talking about, we can count on you to say it perfect.

        ly.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Philip Munger (November 02, 2010 1:18 am ET)
         
      Watching the Breitbart-Palin-Miller circus over the ginned-up KTVA phone tape "controversy" up here in Alaska over the past weekend, seeing Breitbart having to be pre-vetted for a change is quite refreshing.

      Great job, MMFA
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Floyd (November 02, 2010 7:54 am ET)
        3
      mmfa-- In other words, he's not a political player who should be taken seriously by professional journalists.

      Which would explain why mmfa does such intensive coverage of him? Day to day, week to week ... they keep taking him seriously ... along with all their sheeple. It is unbelievable how mmfa can spend so much time covering this guy, then say 'it is a good thing we are here to expose him, because professional journalists understand he isn't worthy any attention'. What kind of journalists work at mmfa? Un-paid ones? I guess the old saying comes to mind: you get what you pay for. If mmfa can't afford professional journalists, at least they should rent some to do these articles. The ones they currently have spend a lot of time leading their sheeple to pasture.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by patriotdawg (November 02, 2010 12:33 pm ET)
           
        Which would explain why mmfa does such intensive coverage of him?

        To document his lies, thus backing up the claim that he should not be taken seriously. Hope this helps!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CatsRBigLuv (November 03, 2010 4:41 am ET)
             
          Well said Patriotdawg,

          but sadly, Floyd is one of those folks that makes a point out of deluding himself. He resists simple truth with the same passion and tenacity that Breitbart routinely applies to his hyper-partisan bs smear campaign.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Sirius Black (November 02, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
         
      Excellent work and excellent commentary in this case, Eric. Now, can you lead all of us to do the same to Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh--get them canned!?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.