ABC News and Breitbart are now at war
November 01, 2010 1:06 pm ET by Eric Boehlert
It's not like we don't try to warn people.
It's not like Media Matters hasn't meticulously detailed the way Andrew Breitbart routinely wrestles with the truth and loses. We've made it plain to anyone who's interested that Breitbart is a propagandist, plain and simple. Worse, he's a propagandist who invents smears and malicious attacks against innocent targets. (Paging Shirley Sherrod.) And he does it all in the name of partisan gain, as well as his own self-aggrandizement.
In other words, he's not a political player who should be taken seriously by professional journalists. And he's certainly not somebody who the press should, in any way, attempt to legitimize or mainstream simply because his track record of deceit has been so prominently marked and footnoted.
And yet for some reason ABC News thought it would be a good idea to reach out to Breitbart and include him in its Election Night coverage. (Was James O'Keefe not available?) It was a preposterous move and one that has led to a multitude of black-eyes, like when Sherrod attorney's likened Breitbart's ABC invitation to "rewarding a Klansman -- giving a Klansman an award for burning a cross on Shirley Sherrod's house." The chronic disgust that greeted ABC's staffing decision forced the network to try to publicly distance itself from Breitbart, stressing that he was only going to contributed to ABC's online coverage.
But now, in an utterly predictable twist, the brawling has become internal, as it were, with Breitbart battling ABC reps over what exactly his role will be and what he claims it was supposed to be. (He's published private emails to state his case.)
That's right, ABC is now publicly feuding with one of its soon-to-be guests, with Breitbart claiming ABC execs lied about what their plans were for him on Election Night, and ABC responding that it's Breitbart who's confused about what the emails said and what his participation was supposed to be. So yes, the obvious question arises: If ABC doesn't think Breitbart can read emails, why do they want him to comment on Tuesday night's election results?
It's a wild, ugly spectacle for ABC News. And like I said, it's not like we didn't try to warn them: When you lay down with Breitbart, you're gonna get fleas.


















They're usually such nice little tirds.
(Fortunately I'm far enough away from the consequences of this folly, but hopefully it will be a salutary lesson for the "shiny bums" who confuse volume of noise with journalistic legitimacy)
ABC Sutis knew what they were doing by hiring this guy 'cause he is 100% legitimate as an "un-bias" Political Analyst who would "NEVER" pal around with James O'Keefe in America. Uh, oh. LOL.
Don't they get it? The lying bastards on FOX and Hate Radio will vilify them NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO! That being the case, they might as well exhibit a little bit of spine and stand up for journalistic integrity.
Kissing the butts of Troglodytes like Britefart only brings them grief. One would think they'd eventually figure this out.
I sure hope so, anyway.
AB - I am a new media titan with "Big" websites and my investigative journalism has uncovered the stories "tradiiontal" lmestream media won't cover. I'm important because no one was talking about Shirley Sherrod, or ACORN until I came along. I was asked to headline all of ABC's election night commentary and oversee web content. Disrespected and silenced by Soro's media elite enforcers.
ABC - we asked this guy to sit in a online/live town hall that we potentially could cut to during election coverage and MAYBE someone, james okeefe or Andrew's family, could catch a second of his inflated ego in the background. There is no Wucking Fay this guy was going to actually contribute or "do" anything substantial - kind of like his current work.
Seems like a good time for both side to call this whole ridiculous thing off.
Scoundrels all! I'd personally like to kick the ass of whoever made the suggestion to have this eejit on board for their coverage. And I'd personally like to kick the ass of Andrew Breitbart if I didn't think he'd cry all over me in his titty ass whiny baby voice. I just hate shrill and crybaby men! Ladies too for that matter! ;-0)
A sympathy pony. If not raised properly, it could grow up to be a hate horse.
Answer: 'Cause FoxNews, the #1 Republican Tea Party Cable Channel, booked too many of their Republican Tea Party Candidates and therefore FoxNews had to DROP Breitbart quickly, LOL.
Yeh, poor Barty! He would never edit the truth to make somebody look bad, would he? Poor little victim, eh?
Breitbart is currently engaged in another false media campaign in Alaska, where he has accused a local CBS affiliate of concocting a plot against Senate candidate Joe Miller--but the only evidence he has been able to produce is a fuzzy audio clip that hardly substantiates his claim.
Breitbart has a reputation of never-ending intentional dishonesty and making up "facts" in order to paint the left as evil to distract from the everyday evil malpractices of the right (Fox News, Glen Beck, Rushbo hate-filled false propaganda, which used to air Breitbart's stuff; McConnell; Boehner; Cantor; Miller; Sarah Palin . . . the right wingnuts).
It is amazing you could be oblivious to Breitbart's notoriously wretched character and that you have been taken in by him (unless you are a Fox News simpleton and ditto-head).
I would encourage you to contact ABC News Chief David Westin and voice your outrage 212-456-7777 option 1 will place you in to the operator and simply ask for David Westin's office.
If Brietbart somehow is on the lineup, we will immediately boycott Disney and ABC.
Dear ABC News:
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not let Brietbart manipulate you. While the wisdom of you letting him associate with you at all is highly questionable (he is not a “conservative” but rather an inflammatory, sensationalistic, fear-mongering hack… George Will is a conservative), he is now trying to work his magic by creating a win-win situation for himself. If you don’t let him on-air, then you’re the corrupt liberal media (which deliberately and conveniently ignores that George Will plays a very prominent role on your network) and if you let him on, then of course you’ve allowed him to spread his corrupt, inflammatory message. Be strong. Stand by your standards, principles, etc. Do not fall into the same trap as the rest of the media, which in the fear of being labeled “liberal” or “biased” will bend over backwards to convince people otherwise (Fox News deserves a shot at the front row of the WH Briefing room, Juan Williams was unfairly fired from NPR, etc.) which actually leads to the meida in country tilting to the right amazingly.
And if you’re just in it for the money, then disassociate yourself from him completely and bring on a liberal commentator who will rail against him, which will provide the “sizzle” I suspect you may be looking for.
Dear ABC News:
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not let Brietbart manipulate you. While the wisdom of you letting him associate with you at all is highly questionable (he is not a "conservative" but rather an inflammatory, sensationalistic, fear-mongering hack; George Will is a conservative), he is now trying to work his magic by creating a win-win situation for himself. If you don't let him on-air, then you're the corrupt liberal media (which deliberately and conveniently ignores that George Will plays a very prominent role on your network) and if you let him on, then of course you've allowed him to spread his corrupt, inflammatory message. Be strong. Stand by your standards, principles, etc. Do not fall into the same trap as the rest of the media, which in the fear of being labeled "liberal" or "biased" will bend over backwards to convince people otherwise (Fox News deserves a shot at the front row of the WH Briefing room, Juan Williams was unfairly fired from NPR, etc.) which actually leads to the meida in country tilting to the right amazingly.
And if you're just in it for the money, then disassociate yourself from him completely and bring on a liberal commentator who will rail against him, which will provide the "sizzle" I suspect you may be looking for.
Well, OK, maybe not. But I really did send it and remain plenty piffed off that ABC News even considered using this jackwagon for anything more than holding the door open for real journalists.
Yes, this is that incredible non-biased reporting at media-matters. Using Shirley, "I could tell he was being superior to me" Sherrod's attorney, who calls Breitbart a Klansman. Oh by the way, Shirley's family got close to $1 million from the Govt. for the money her family supposedly was cheated out of.
"And he's certainly not somebody who the press should, in any way, attempt to legitimize or mainstream ..."
It's "whom" the press should... The press is the subject of the clause, Breitbart the object. The press should (not) attempt to legitimize WHOM.
"When you lay down with Breitbart, you're gonna get fleas."
My mother/teacher is rolling over in her grave. It's when you LIE down with Breitbart... Lie means to rest or recline: it's lie, lay, lain. Lay means to place or put: it's lay, laid, laid.
That any of you should be given the right to discuss our discourse is frightening. The blind and stupid leading the blind and stupid.
ly.
Great job, MMFA
Which would explain why mmfa does such intensive coverage of him? Day to day, week to week ... they keep taking him seriously ... along with all their sheeple. It is unbelievable how mmfa can spend so much time covering this guy, then say 'it is a good thing we are here to expose him, because professional journalists understand he isn't worthy any attention'. What kind of journalists work at mmfa? Un-paid ones? I guess the old saying comes to mind: you get what you pay for. If mmfa can't afford professional journalists, at least they should rent some to do these articles. The ones they currently have spend a lot of time leading their sheeple to pasture.
To document his lies, thus backing up the claim that he should not be taken seriously. Hope this helps!
but sadly, Floyd is one of those folks that makes a point out of deluding himself. He resists simple truth with the same passion and tenacity that Breitbart routinely applies to his hyper-partisan bs smear campaign.