He'll go down swinging my azz. If trouble were to start all Beck would do is run. If the baggers think Beck will be fighting by their side, I'd like to see the look on their face when they see the pictures of him and his gold leaving the country.
He'll go down swinging my azz. If trouble were to start all Beck would do is run. If the baggers think Beck will be fighting by their side, I'd like to see the look on their face when they see the pictures of him and his gold leaving the country.
Actually those two descriptors of Glenn sound truly aggressive and not peaceful at all. However, Beck seems to be cracking up lately. My guess is that the side effects of his long years of drinking are finally big-time catching up with him, It sounds like he is hearing things that are not there and things being spoken to him when no one is talking to him,
...As are his followers. I literally heard a woman call in the Colmes radio show the other night wanting to know where the FEMA camps were being set up. Whirly whirly whirly whirly...
Hitler was abducted by aliens just before the end of the war and they mated his dna with alien dna, then dumped Hitler back into the bunker, and, of course, Beck is the progeny of that hybrid clone.
The rapture is near, as was prophesied in Revelations, and the mothership will be returning soon to harvest the livestock, as it were.
Intergalactic roundup, YEEHAW!!!!
Notice how he says "some of the people are progressives" the same way he would say "some of these people are scum" then in the next sentence calls the people who are normally on his side "stupid" in the most polite way possible.
Then he goes on with his normal sociopath paranoia. Saying "don't listen to anyone but me. I have all the answers. Sell everything you don't think you need and buy gold from goldline. and store food from this other place that pays me."
Beck is a good example of a stoner who no longer is consuming drugs.(for the time being)
He's a big "student" of prewar Germany and the methods of media manipulation employed, etc.
There was another master manipulator who used similar ambiguous "nice" terms like "Hope", "faith", "charity" and who spoke and wrote thousands of times about "restoring Christianity", back in those days.
Beck is a good example of a stoner who no longer is consuming drugs.(for the time being)
He's a big "student" of prewar Germany and the methods of media manipulation employed, etc.
There was another master manipulator who used similar ambiguous "nice" terms like "Hope", "faith", "charity" and who spoke and wrote thousands of times about "restoring Christianity", back in those days.
I think what he is saying here is that his audience is too stupid to play 3D chess. And apparently too stupid to realize that he just called them stupid. Mostly because, by accusing his enemies of playing 3D chess, he has demonized them by pointing out their evil intellect, and now his audienced is riled at the "intellectuals" who think they know everything. When, as they all know, can't be right: Becky is the only one that knows everything. And he isn't an evil intellectual.
In the Republican parallel universe, Stupid is the new Smart. Simple Sarah Palin, bless her heart, is building a Presidential campaign around the concept that Stupid is Better.
2000 Ducati 748. Somewhere arround 30,000 miles. A few carbon bits here and there. An aftermarket set of risers for the clipons means I can waft down the highway and still have feeling in my fingertips at the end.
Its gorgeous, tiny, and makes enthusiatic sounds. Not as strong as the atypical 600cc Japanese gofaster, but few can match its handling.
I been trying to ID yours as well. Looks like a good machine to cruise about on, but I can't see a lot of detail in the pic.
Hehe, yeh, taken on a phone. It's an '86 Yamaha 700 Maxim. Custom leather seat (by me). For years was my only transpo, but last year, while the docs were trying to figure out why I hurt so much, the consensus was that having only the bike for trans was what was causing it, or at least exacerbating it, so these days I only ride if the weather isn't nasty. Turns out the bike had nothing to do with the abdominal pain, but now I have a minivan. Which means that I no longer have any excuse not to fit into the rotation with my wife picking up the kid from day care. rats.
Interesting. In just the time I've been watching Beck (not too long) it seems he's changed somehow ... like he really works hard at finding all of these imaginary dots to connect, and he's so wrapped up in his conspiracy worldview that he's losing what little he had to lose to begin with. And of course, there's the classic sign of a true tinfoil-hat type, the way every new development is worked into the grand conspiracy... Net Neutrality has been planned for years to cause the Wikileaks scandal? Huh? I really get a kick out of his frequent heavy sighs, too: must be tough having the weight of the world on your shoulders, when you're the only one who can see THE TRUTH! Poor lunatic.
The republicans are so completely vapid. They exist in another dimension, or they channel crazy people. As if they could say anything. Their side has nothing to complain about. They got their illegal wars, they got their tax cuts, they got their EVERYTHING THEY WANTED short of obama giving presidency to Palin. NOTHING is good enough. No amount of concession makes it past the right wing blinders.
Its how they can yell about Obama taking two whole days to catch the brave men from Wikileaks: So in 2001, 3000+ people were killed by a man when the WTC was destroyed. When did we capture bin Laden again...? Oh, Bush shut down the group that was looking for him. Bush didnt catch him at all. But the government sure gets efficient when it wants to hurt people who demand governments be held responsible.
Thanks, right wingers, for getting the point so totally wrong you're dooming us all.
I'm not sure how we (the USA) could have an ILLEGAL war when war has to be approved by The Congress which consist of Democrats and Republicans...If it's approved by the Congress then it's not ILLEGAL!!
it's illegal(iraq)because the people,a lot of dems and a few repubs voted against it,it started under false pretenses,i.e. wmds,al qaida in iraq,and the u.n. security council voted against it,as well as nato.it also undermined the geneva convention,by which all countries involved have to abide.anymore bright ones?
If NATO voted against it why did they send troops?? You are correct some dems and ONE repub voted against the war but a majority voted for war!! Don't rewrite history!! the UN would never approve war even if the UN building in New York was being attacked!!
The reason the government gave for going into afghanistan was because that is were al quaida is based and we wanted to kill them after what they did on 9/11
I beg your pardon?
There has been no war declaration in either case.
We are at war with terror, remember.
That seems to mean we can do anything any where any when we choose because we are the biggest swinging dick on the planet at the mo and for the nonce.
Congress voted and passed a war resolution with Iraq and they also voted for Authorization for Military force against terrorist which is when we went into Afganistan.
It is nice to be the "biggest swinging dick on the planet". Isn't it??
Just because Congress voted for it doesn't mean its either legitimate or legal in the eyes of the international community. You continue to think that America is above criticism and the law.
The Congress never voted to go to war. However, they allowed Bushie to do his deceptive, unethical lying & illegal thing c/o of Newtie and his fetid ilk...you deceive others as well as America, schmuck.
so if america vote\s for a war ,it cant be a crime. ergo if north koreas govt decides to go to war it cant be a crime because it was approved by their leaders.
regardless of the morality or legality of the invasion of iraq,there still is the issue of the wisdom of the action.i take no pleasure in saying i told you so,but it was so obvious that overthrowing saddam was going to be a disaster.any fool could see saddam was a megolomaniac,but he was not suicidal. he would never attackj the u.s. his bluster was for public consumption.we knew long before 911 that his wmd programs were dismantled. we knew saddam was an enemy of al-quida and the jihadist and fundamentalists.we knew that yes saddam was a killer who had dozens of his people executed every year, but we also knew the kind of chaos and destruction his overthrow would bring about. army intelligence sure as hell knew.anyone with a half a brain should have known that america invading a muslim land in the mideast was going to create more hatred not goodwill.
And going back to the original point, the conservatives have been pretty much getting their way for years... and yet they still go about crying like a bunch of three year olds.
They say liberals are irrelevant and marginal while at the same time claiming they are about to take over the world at any minute.
Eventually when it is all said and done, the Iraq invasion will be blamed on progressives... Just keep watching the chalk board.
Read U.N. Resolution 1441.
"Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1991 invasion and occupation."
The fact that Iraq did not live up to the terms of the cease-fire is reason enough to invade Iraq and change the regime. Iraq had used WMD's so why was it not plausible to think he still had some.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998
"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998
Your're wrong. The US didn't have authorization from the UN to
invade and there were inspectors on the ground in Iraq telling us they weren't finding anything. SH was complying with the demands from the UN and US before the invasion. It is clear that we were lied into the invasion.
U.N. Panel Rejects Bush Stance on Military Action
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 1, 2004; Page A15
UNITED NATIONS, Nov. 30 -- An influential U.N.-appointed panel challenged the Bush administration's right to use military force against an enemy that does not pose an imminent military threat. The 16-member panel, which was appointed by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, said in a long-awaited report that only the U.N. Security Council has the legal standing to authorize such a "preventive war."
The panel's findings reflect persistent international unease over the U.S. invasion of Iraq last year without an explicit council endorsement, noting that "there is little evident international acceptance of the idea of security being best preserved by a balance of power, or by any single -- even benignly motivated -- superpower." It also recommends the establishment of five guidelines that must be met before force can be legitimately used -- including a determination that force is used as a last resort and that the threat is serious.
"If there are good arguments for preventive military action, with good evidence to support them, they should be put to the Security Council," the report said. But "in a world full of perceived potential threats, the risk of the global order . . . is simply too great for the legality of unilateral preventive action . . . to be accepted."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23416-2004Nov30.htmlYour text to link here...
Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan
Share28 Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger in Washington The Guardian, Thursday 16 September 2004 02.28 BST Article historyThe United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal.
Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: "Yes, if you wish."
He then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan
Share28 Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger in Washington The Guardian, Thursday 16 September 2004 02.28 BST Article historyThe United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal.
Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: "Yes, if you wish."
He then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Iraq war was illegal and breached UN charter, says Annan
Share28 Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger in Washington The Guardian, Thursday 16 September 2004 02.28 BST Article historyThe United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal.
Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: "Yes, if you wish."
He then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Just because Resolution 1441 was breached does not automatically mean that military intervention was warranted or required. In order to legally commit war, the US has to get official approval from the UN, like they did during the 1991 Gulf War. The fact that the US didn't makes this war illegal.
Also, I'm certainly not going to take anything from a site called "RightWingNews" seriously. Try diversifying your sources instead. Try AljazeeraEnglish, they are 10 times more credible than any BS right-wing blog.
the "left" was not right. they believed bush when he said that hussein still had wmds. but only a few months before 911, both cheney and rice proclaimed on t.v. that saddam had no more wmds and had been contained by the sanctions
Like Fox news, the Bush administration had an agenda that would not allow reality to get in its way. Former weapons inspector Scott Ritter and others had a different view on Iraq that was effectively marginalized before the invasion. There was no active threat that required immediate action in Iraq.
Its kind of like Beck's war on progressives. The narrative fits the agenda but really, there is nothing there.
The more contradictory his rhetoric becomes the further he goes out into the fringe. Beck fans can't believe in reality and Glenn Beck. It's like trying to a foot on two pieces of free floating ice that are slowly moving apart. At some point, you have to choose either one or the other piece of ice to stand on.
I didn't read about the "revolution" until today. But this morning Beck spent about 20 min on how bad traffic is NYC is during the Christmas season and how annoying it is.
He didn't seem like a guy who was worried about the second day of revolution.
it's a long article so I'll just give you the relevant part of it;
"A couple days after Kelly's wife, Terry, had a miscarriage, Beck called her live on the air and says, 'We hear you had a miscarriage,' " remembers Brad Miller, a former Y95 DJ and Clear Channel programmer. "When Terry said, 'Yes,' Beck proceeded to joke about how Bruce [Kelly] apparently can't do anything right -- about he can't even have a baby."
Sounds like he made a mistake like we all have!! He shouldn't have said it, plain and simple, but it was 20+ years ago and the only thing I can find about it was that he got fired because fellow employee's complained about it not the woman, Terry!! He seems to be a better person now....Like me!! I have learned from my mistakes :)
Thank You for the information...I had never heard this story before!!
Like how he told a muslim congressman (paraphrasing) "How do I know I can trust you?"
Listen Jake5, put down the kool aid. Beck gets paid millions of dollars because gullible people like you think he's reliable and eat up every terrible word he says.
Why hate the guy because he doesn't believe in political correctness? Is it because you think he hurt the congressman's feelings? It was a preamble to the whole interview, but you probably don't know that since all MMFA ranted about was that one question.
It isn't politically correct to NOT accuse a lawfully elected congressman, who happens to be Muslim, whether or not he is working with the enemy.
He implied that Ellison is an enemy of the United States simply because of his religious belief. Just because it was in the "preamble" to an interview and just because Beck wormily couches his "question" with the cowardly "I'm not asking this, but people are maybe thinking of asking this" BS, doesn't make his remarks to Rep. Ellison any less disrespectful (and stupid).
It isn't a lack of political correctness, its xenophobia. Glenn Beck has stated things that are beyond redemption. Have you even looked at all the things that Beck has said over the years? Political correctness has nothing to do with it.
I hate him because he uses his national pulpit to start rumors, revise history, advance conspiracy theories with no basis in fact, and because he then goes and cynically brags to Forbes magazine that he has no interest in politics. He says he's just in it for the money. He made $32 million last year, so he's doing that right.
political correctness comes in many forms. there are just as many on the right trying to ban books or remove the truth from school curriculums as there are on the left.its rightwingers who want to ban halloween because of its supposed satanic rituals etc.etc.glenn beck is not someone who is standing up to political correctness. he is a liar who is laughing all the way to the bank. when he is off the air he claims that he is just an entertainer. but he is very aware of how riled up and fearful some of his fans are. he has clearly stated that those who disagree with him are evil and plotting to use violence against him and all true americans.he does not care about the results this will have. thats why i hate him
A mistake? No, a mistake would have been letting slip that Bruce's wife had had a miscarriage if Bruce hadn't chosen to make that public. What Beck did was cruel and uncalled for and should be enough for any decent person to conclude that he is a vile and pathetic excuse for a human being. Glen Beck is a sociopath - he doesn't care who he harms so long as it improves his financial position or makes the rubes adore him even more.
in a world where two and a half men is the most popular t.v.comedy and arrested development gets cancelled, i will not be using popularity as a judge of a books worth
how is it a mistake to deliberately make fun of a woman who miscarried? That speaks to his character, it's not some slip of the tongue. How naive are you?
a mistake???????????????????????????????/
why does personal responsibility mean nothing to you guys.by the way what,if any ,of his actions could lead one to believe that he has repented and become a better person?
a mistake???????????????????????????????/
why does personal responsibility mean nothing to you guys.by the way what,if any ,of his actions could lead one to believe that he has repented and become a better person?
Let me clarify the above statement... in my excitement to reply I rushed it.
YOU are defending Beck by saying I'M pulling things out of my a$$, when Beck is the one who makes millions of dollars making outrageous claims that he pulls from... where? oh right, his a$$.
Now insert my closing zing of
This is the sad state of glenn supporters. So a$$backwards they crap out of their mouth.
he did it when he was a shock jock radio d.j. he called the wife of a crosstown rival and made fun of the fact that she had a miscarraige.wow he was inspired by the founding fathers
Glenn Beck's dangerous rhetoric concerns me as much as the next person. However, I have started to feel that there is NO WAY he actually believes the lies he spits. He is a propagandist, and a brilliant one at that. A self avowed Orson Welles fan, I honestly believe that Beck is simply taking Welles' "War of the Worlds" hoax to new and extreme heights, building a media empire off of it. I predict that in 20 years, Media Studies classes will be studying what Beck did during this time. It is upsetting and worrisome to those of us who are sane, but if we view this objectively, Beck is one of the most brilliant propagandists that the American Right have produced over the last few years.
However, I have started to feel that there is NO WAY he actually believes the lies he spits
I think he does believe. I think Beck convinced himself of a few things years back and to keep up the illusion, he has to go farther down the road of conspiracy and fear mongering.
If progressives are evil, going back to the turn of the last century, then certainly they must be everywhere, plotting and preparing for attack.
If the revolution has begun, then we can we expect Beck's listeners to begin to grab their weapons any day now.
Yikes!!!! This is like listening and watching Oral Roberts on his TeeVee scam show 20 years ago... So Cluster-Fox is now doing old-timey evangelistic preacher shows?? Hummm.. What will Billo the clown, hanratty and gretter do now?? How do they compete with old-timey preachers??
I can just picture whole 'living areas' of nursing homes and assisted-living centers with this gospel blaring for hours at a time and organizing taking on a whole different meaning!!!
This man is truly a prophet of lunacy.... and it's ALL a lie.. But, what great entertainment if you're in the mood for a mind-wipe..
I guess Beck is in a hurry to get his civil war started since he's running out of time. His last sponsor is going down for fraud and Beck will probably go down with them, so he has a new sense of urgency.
My attempt at a Glenn Beck monologue:
"Aww gee Wally, doze nasty libwul, socialist, fascist, communist,uber left wing progwessive sons of motherless goats are twying to take over da world. Day want to enslave us and make us work 20 hours a day in the salt mine for a handful of survival seeds, we're doomed.
America....you're being conned....i mean...i don't wanna....i love it when a man touches my....this is how it is america. The republicans are the first political party in history to have their own cable television network and they are using it against you. They are using WORDS to trick you.....they know you're not too smart and only have to be told something 3 times for you to believe it so they keep hammering those nasty sounding WORDS to divide you. You know their favourite theories...divide and conquer, shock and awe....you have to wake up America....*sniff, sniff*, everyone now has a label, you're a far left loony liberal or a neo con teabagger...they want you to hate each other. Thats why you're on the internet hurling insults at someone who ,if you saw them in the street ,would probably give them a polite nod and a wave. Don't let them fool you america, its not to late....show these protaganists of hate that you are better than them...COME TOGETHER AMERICA...tell fox and the republicans that you will not be labelled and you won't live your life in constant fear...I mean....has your life really changed that much....Good night america and Darwin be with you
My attempt at a Glenn Beck monologue:
"Aww gee Wally, doze nasty libwul, socialist, fascist, communist,uber left wing progwessive sons of motherless goats are twying to take over da world. Day want to enslave us and make us work 20 hours a day in the salt mine for a handful of survival seeds, we're doomed.
America....you're being conned....i mean...i don't wanna....i love it when a man touches my....this is how it is america. The republicans are the first political party in history to have their own cable television network and they are using it against you. They are using WORDS to trick you.....they know you're not too smart and only have to be told something 3 times for you to believe it so they keep hammering those nasty sounding WORDS to divide you. You know their favourite theories...divide and conquer, shock and awe....you have to wake up America....*sniff, sniff*, everyone now has a label, you're a far left loony liberal or a neo con teabagger...they want you to hate each other. Thats why you're on the internet hurling insults at someone who ,if you saw them in the street ,would probably give them a polite nod and a wave. Don't let them fool you america, its not to late....show these protaganists of hate that you are better than them...COME TOGETHER AMERICA...tell fox and the republicans that you will not be labelled and you won't live your life in constant fear...I mean....has your life really changed that much....Good night america and Darwin be with you
I am hoping that the FCC will finally catch up with him and the racism, lies and treason that he spews over the public airwaves. Rev. Sharpton is leading the way against Rush Limbaugh's racist rants over public airwaves which are licensed. The public has a right to know information based on truth. It does not have to put up with acts of verbal treason, racism, bigotry and calls to riot. Fox has been getting away with dragging our nation through the mud and muck of falsehoods. It is time the FCC held them accountable. Any member of the public may complain to the FCC. Remember the wardrobe malfunction at the Super Bowl? What Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck have been allowed to get away with has nothing to do with individual free speech, they cannot lie in advertizing, they should not be allowed to perpetuate lies in order to deceive and enrage.
I am hoping that the FCC will finally catch up with him and the racism, lies and treason that he spews over the public airwaves. Rev. Sharpton is leading the way against Rush Limbaugh's racist rants over public airwaves which are licensed. The public has a right to know information based on truth. It does not have to put up with acts of verbal treason, racism, bigotry and calls to riot. Fox has been getting away with dragging our nation through the mud and muck of falsehoods. It is time the FCC held them accountable. Any member of the public may complain to the FCC. Remember the wardrobe malfunction at the Super Bowl? What Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck have been allowed to get away with has nothing to do with individual free speech, they cannot lie in advertizing, they should not be allowed to perpetuate lies in order to deceive and enrage.
there is no Jennifer Connelly to give him a contact with reality
Instead there are all those real Americans who cheer him on and wan't to believe all this.
Being lied to and manipulated does not bother his fans at all. For some reason they would rather fear an imminent attack from progressives than actually face those that are actually manipulating and taking advantage of them.
Have come to the conclusion that Beck could randomly shoot a member of his Friday audience, on air, and the Beckrophiliacs would defend him. In their eyes he can do (or say) no wrong.
beck fans do realize that if this was the 1970s ,Beck would appear in bad suits with a cheesy moustache spouting liberal bromides and slogans and calling the right wing fascists and traitors etc. the man has no convictions. he is simply a hired gun for whatever view will make him some money.intersetingly, regardless of what political affiliation he is supporting at the time ,beck will always be barking about danger and revolution.
ReplyReport Abuse
County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.
He also said on today's program that "I'm going down swinging with peace and love in my heart."
Onward Christian soldiers, marching as to war.....
I suggest the word is demonstrable.
If he were a lab mouse we'd put him out of his misery, but he is human and we liberals respect human life and don't threaten violence.
In Glenn's case, he should merely retire to a remote island, Alejandro Selkirk comes to mind, where he won't hurt anyone and nobody will bother him.
The rapture is near, as was prophesied in Revelations, and the mothership will be returning soon to harvest the livestock, as it were.
Intergalactic roundup, YEEHAW!!!!
Then he goes on with his normal sociopath paranoia. Saying "don't listen to anyone but me. I have all the answers. Sell everything you don't think you need and buy gold from goldline. and store food from this other place that pays me."
He kind of uses the same tone that Olbermann uses when talking about conservatives.
when was the last time Olbermann poured 'gas' over someone and brought out a match?
when was the last time Olbermann ranted against a backdroop of Nazi marches or Communist symbols?
He's a big "student" of prewar Germany and the methods of media manipulation employed, etc.
There was another master manipulator who used similar ambiguous "nice" terms like "Hope", "faith", "charity" and who spoke and wrote thousands of times about "restoring Christianity", back in those days.
He's a big "student" of prewar Germany and the methods of media manipulation employed, etc.
There was another master manipulator who used similar ambiguous "nice" terms like "Hope", "faith", "charity" and who spoke and wrote thousands of times about "restoring Christianity", back in those days.
But, Glenn, what about the 4th dimension and the Matrix ?
The democrats are starting the revolution!!
The democrats are starting the revolution!!
"More fun for us kids. Doing simple things up against nazi's and fifth columnists."
I didn't know Beckles was on the coordination comittee?
Its gorgeous, tiny, and makes enthusiatic sounds. Not as strong as the atypical 600cc Japanese gofaster, but few can match its handling.
I been trying to ID yours as well. Looks like a good machine to cruise about on, but I can't see a lot of detail in the pic.
Happy rides too you. :)
Nice bikes.
first it was his 'ass surgery'.
then possible blindness.
then numbness in hands and feet.
. . .doesn't anything ever affect his mouth?
Its how they can yell about Obama taking two whole days to catch the brave men from Wikileaks: So in 2001, 3000+ people were killed by a man when the WTC was destroyed. When did we capture bin Laden again...? Oh, Bush shut down the group that was looking for him. Bush didnt catch him at all. But the government sure gets efficient when it wants to hurt people who demand governments be held responsible.
Thanks, right wingers, for getting the point so totally wrong you're dooming us all.
There has been no war declaration in either case.
We are at war with terror, remember.
That seems to mean we can do anything any where any when we choose because we are the biggest swinging dick on the planet at the mo and for the nonce.
It is nice to be the "biggest swinging dick on the planet". Isn't it??
The Congress never voted to go to war. However, they allowed Bushie to do his deceptive, unethical lying & illegal thing c/o of Newtie and his fetid ilk...you deceive others as well as America, schmuck.
They say liberals are irrelevant and marginal while at the same time claiming they are about to take over the world at any minute.
Eventually when it is all said and done, the Iraq invasion will be blamed on progressives... Just keep watching the chalk board.
"Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1991 invasion and occupation."
The fact that Iraq did not live up to the terms of the cease-fire is reason enough to invade Iraq and change the regime. Iraq had used WMD's so why was it not plausible to think he still had some.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998
"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998
You can read many more here.
http://www.rightwingnews.com/quotes/demsonwmds.php
The left was right then, so what changed?
invade and there were inspectors on the ground in Iraq telling us they weren't finding anything. SH was complying with the demands from the UN and US before the invasion. It is clear that we were lied into the invasion.
U.N. Panel Rejects Bush Stance on Military Action
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 1, 2004; Page A15
UNITED NATIONS, Nov. 30 -- An influential U.N.-appointed panel challenged the Bush administration's right to use military force against an enemy that does not pose an imminent military threat. The 16-member panel, which was appointed by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, said in a long-awaited report that only the U.N. Security Council has the legal standing to authorize such a "preventive war."
The panel's findings reflect persistent international unease over the U.S. invasion of Iraq last year without an explicit council endorsement, noting that "there is little evident international acceptance of the idea of security being best preserved by a balance of power, or by any single -- even benignly motivated -- superpower." It also recommends the establishment of five guidelines that must be met before force can be legitimately used -- including a determination that force is used as a last resort and that the threat is serious.
"If there are good arguments for preventive military action, with good evidence to support them, they should be put to the Security Council," the report said. But "in a world full of perceived potential threats, the risk of the global order . . . is simply too great for the legality of unilateral preventive action . . . to be accepted."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23416-2004Nov30.htmlYour text to link here...
Share28 Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger in Washington The Guardian, Thursday 16 September 2004 02.28 BST Article historyThe United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal.
Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: "Yes, if you wish."
He then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Share28 Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger in Washington The Guardian, Thursday 16 September 2004 02.28 BST Article historyThe United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal.
Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: "Yes, if you wish."
He then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Share28 Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger in Washington The Guardian, Thursday 16 September 2004 02.28 BST Article historyThe United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal.
Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN's founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: "Yes, if you wish."
He then added unequivocally: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and from the charter point of view it was illegal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Also, I'm certainly not going to take anything from a site called "RightWingNews" seriously. Try diversifying your sources instead. Try AljazeeraEnglish, they are 10 times more credible than any BS right-wing blog.
Its kind of like Beck's war on progressives. The narrative fits the agenda but really, there is nothing there.
"...and this man on my lips."
What can I say, it's Friday.
He didn't seem like a guy who was worried about the second day of revolution.
I report, you decide!
Thank You for the information...I had never heard this story before!!
Like how he told a muslim congressman (paraphrasing) "How do I know I can trust you?"
Listen Jake5, put down the kool aid. Beck gets paid millions of dollars because gullible people like you think he's reliable and eat up every terrible word he says.
He implied that Ellison is an enemy of the United States simply because of his religious belief. Just because it was in the "preamble" to an interview and just because Beck wormily couches his "question" with the cowardly "I'm not asking this, but people are maybe thinking of asking this" BS, doesn't make his remarks to Rep. Ellison any less disrespectful (and stupid).
"We're an entertainment company," Beck says.
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0426/entertainment-fox-news-simon-schuster-glenn-beck-inc.html
Or do you believe that Progressives, lead by wealthy elites are about to force our country into socialism at gunpoint.
Do you work for FOX? "We have the best ratings in cable news, so of course we must be fair & balanced. I mean, look at our ratings!"
Laughable litmus test to apply...
BTW, do you frequent socialist public libraries? BAD RIGHT-WINGER!!!
Strange criteria for not bothering to read a book, yes?
why does personal responsibility mean nothing to you guys.by the way what,if any ,of his actions could lead one to believe that he has repented and become a better person?
why does personal responsibility mean nothing to you guys.by the way what,if any ,of his actions could lead one to believe that he has repented and become a better person?
Are you part of Beck's "Revolution"?
you're condemning me for pulling things out of my a$$ when it comes to DEFENDING GLENN BECK!? ARE YOU SERIOUS!??!?!?!?!?
Wow.
This is the sad state of glenn supporters. So a$$backwards they crap out of their mouth.
YOU are defending Beck by saying I'M pulling things out of my a$$, when Beck is the one who makes millions of dollars making outrageous claims that he pulls from... where? oh right, his a$$.
Now insert my closing zing of
and there we go.
I wonder if he is able to sleep at night, since it would seem that almost everyone is coming to get him.
I think he does believe. I think Beck convinced himself of a few things years back and to keep up the illusion, he has to go farther down the road of conspiracy and fear mongering.
If progressives are evil, going back to the turn of the last century, then certainly they must be everywhere, plotting and preparing for attack.
If the revolution has begun, then we can we expect Beck's listeners to begin to grab their weapons any day now.
I can just picture whole 'living areas' of nursing homes and assisted-living centers with this gospel blaring for hours at a time and organizing taking on a whole different meaning!!!
This man is truly a prophet of lunacy.... and it's ALL a lie.. But, what great entertainment if you're in the mood for a mind-wipe..
"Aww gee Wally, doze nasty libwul, socialist, fascist, communist,uber left wing progwessive sons of motherless goats are twying to take over da world. Day want to enslave us and make us work 20 hours a day in the salt mine for a handful of survival seeds, we're doomed.
America....you're being conned....i mean...i don't wanna....i love it when a man touches my....this is how it is america. The republicans are the first political party in history to have their own cable television network and they are using it against you. They are using WORDS to trick you.....they know you're not too smart and only have to be told something 3 times for you to believe it so they keep hammering those nasty sounding WORDS to divide you. You know their favourite theories...divide and conquer, shock and awe....you have to wake up America....*sniff, sniff*, everyone now has a label, you're a far left loony liberal or a neo con teabagger...they want you to hate each other. Thats why you're on the internet hurling insults at someone who ,if you saw them in the street ,would probably give them a polite nod and a wave. Don't let them fool you america, its not to late....show these protaganists of hate that you are better than them...COME TOGETHER AMERICA...tell fox and the republicans that you will not be labelled and you won't live your life in constant fear...I mean....has your life really changed that much....Good night america and Darwin be with you
"Aww gee Wally, doze nasty libwul, socialist, fascist, communist,uber left wing progwessive sons of motherless goats are twying to take over da world. Day want to enslave us and make us work 20 hours a day in the salt mine for a handful of survival seeds, we're doomed.
America....you're being conned....i mean...i don't wanna....i love it when a man touches my....this is how it is america. The republicans are the first political party in history to have their own cable television network and they are using it against you. They are using WORDS to trick you.....they know you're not too smart and only have to be told something 3 times for you to believe it so they keep hammering those nasty sounding WORDS to divide you. You know their favourite theories...divide and conquer, shock and awe....you have to wake up America....*sniff, sniff*, everyone now has a label, you're a far left loony liberal or a neo con teabagger...they want you to hate each other. Thats why you're on the internet hurling insults at someone who ,if you saw them in the street ,would probably give them a polite nod and a wave. Don't let them fool you america, its not to late....show these protaganists of hate that you are better than them...COME TOGETHER AMERICA...tell fox and the republicans that you will not be labelled and you won't live your life in constant fear...I mean....has your life really changed that much....Good night america and Darwin be with you
"Verry interestingck,.... But stupid"
there is no Jennifer Connelly to give him a contact with reality
he is yelling fire in a crowded theater without caring about the consequences
Instead there are all those real Americans who cheer him on and wan't to believe all this.
Being lied to and manipulated does not bother his fans at all. For some reason they would rather fear an imminent attack from progressives than actually face those that are actually manipulating and taking advantage of them.
prophecy.