Glenn Beck Limps Into 2011 With Falling Ratings
January 27, 2011 9:07 am ET by Eric Boehlert
What a difference one year makes.
Just about 52 weeks ago, Fox News’ Glenn Beck was poised at the onset of a early 2010 ratings wave that propelled his daily show to news heights. Through late January and into early February 2010, Glenn Beck drew nearly three million viewers each night, making it at times the most-watched program on cable news.
Glenn Beck had been hot for months, no doubt about that. Back in August, 2009, Beck flirted with the mighty three million-viewer mark, and through most of the remaining months that year his program averaged approximately 2.5 million viewers, or more, each night.
But in January and February of last year, something popped and Glenn Beck became a monster ratings hit, drawing three million fans a night
Fast forward twelve months and Glenn Beck is having troubling drawing two million fans each night, let alone three. In fact, through the first three weeks of the year, Beck’s show topped the two million mark only three times out of the first 15 episodes that aired.
I’ve been monitoring Beck’s ratings for some time and I cannot recall a streak of weeks like this where he’s so consistently fallen below two million viewers. This is definitely new territory for Glenn Beck. I don’t know if it’s the utter sameness of the show that’s driving former viewers away, but the air is clearly seeping out. Between November and the first three weeks of January, Glenn Beck has lost, on average, nearly 500,000 viewers.
Or put another way, the days of Glenn Beck drawing three million viewers are long gone. And they’re never coming back. But at this rate, the two-million viewership mark seems to be slipping away, too. Glenn Beck now routinely flirts with ratings in the 1.6-1.8 million range, which is almost exactly half the rating Beck was getting one year ago. In truth, that’s how many viewers Glenn Beck used to attract when the host was on vacation and somebody less famous stood in for him. Now that’s how many tune in when he’s there in the studio.
Also, consider the mountain of media attention Beck basked in during the last twelve months and how he’s supposed to be the point person for a grassroots American movement. And then realize his audience is down 50% from where it was 12 months ago. Kind of weird, right?
And yes, the decline comes in the wake of news that Beck’s nationally syndicated radio show was recently yanked out of two of the countries largest markets, New York and Philadelphia.
Truth is, Beck’s current ratings wilt stretches back to last December and late November. And really, ever since the midterm elections, Glenn Beck has fallen to a ratings plateau that the program hasn’t flirted with in well over a year. Beck’s rating average for all of last year was 2.25 million viewers, according to Nielsen. But you would have to be back to the week of Nov. 11- Nov. 19 to find when Glenn Beck actually hit that number on a Monday-to-Friday basis. Since mid-November, Beck’s numbers have been down consistently.
And that’s despite the big media pushes Beck tried to orchestrate in December by taking his live radio and TV show to Wilmington, Ohio, and that’s despite the huge news story surrounding the Tucson gun massacre in which Beck was featured when the focus turned to today’s far-right anti-government rhetoric. Despite the newsworthy events, Beck’s ratings never spiked. Instead, they remain consistently below his 2010 average as he continues to limp into 2011.


















*"Makes sense" being a relative term when applied to the Glenn Beck school of psychosis.
The man is a MONSTER who has affected the lives of others and their relationships adversely. He needs to be taken off the air before he does some real damage.
He's the only one who can do it with a straight face. Surely he can weave a conspiracy theory that warps the 50-year old, well-worn analogy into a secret message that Obama wants us to be like the Soviet Union.
ERR 2011... But if he had it his way he'd make it 2001 again.
1. Morning Zoo DJ Glenn Beck √
2. Christmas Sweater Glenn Beck √
3. Ready-to-snap Glenn Beck
4. ?
"Who's still watching Glenn Beck's show?"
I'm sure listing all the viewers wouldn't take up too much space.
I used to watch his show all the time after the Presidential election. I watch maybe one episode a week now. It's not that I dislike Beck now, it's just I'm not as interested in watching political television period.
I would argue he had no business drawing 3 million viewers from 5pm to begin with. We'll see in 2012 if his ratings go back up or if they remain the same.
First his show will have to make it to 2012. That's not a sure thing.
If he is cancelled, like another loud mouth idiot got cancelled recently, it will be because he says or does something so off the wall FOX can't defend him.
If his numbers continue to fall, even if they're beating the competition, I could see Fox replacing him if they believe someone else could do better. Given Fox's greater availability and more dedicated audience, he'd be in big trouble if he started getting close to Matthews' numbers.
AND, they could always just "demote" Beck & he could be a guest on the S & M show, with Pastor Beck!!
Ju$t THINK of the rating$!!
(to Fox TV trolls: hint-hint)
Beck built his early ratings blast by swinging for the fences every single night. But the trouble is, you can only clear the fence so many times until people become unimpressed with the routine, leaving little choice but to move the fence further out. The farther it moves out, the greater the risk of a clear-cut Jack Lucas incident, something that no right-wing professional liar can afford.
Well, so is Limbaugh's, but he's still got a hardcore fan base willing to swallow anything he shovels out despite it being exactly the same as yesterday and the day before, etc.
Beck has his hardcore base as well. The only way he'll truly take a dive is if he does something that alienates his advertisers, and they begin to pull away in droves.
That's a good thing as far as his fans are concerned. They don't want anything new, different, or thoughtful: too hard to keep up.
Beck is a crybaby and a twerp, he will not hold the same loyalty.
Seems a must to keep him on air if they still contuining with him at that high price.
Or you could have an open mind and do your own research.
I educated myself by going to other sources besides MMFA. You should try it.
I also implied that Beck has lied. Why haven't you asked me for that proof?
I'm not going to research YOUR argument. You are too lazy to do so yourself, so one of two things is likely true. 1) You searched and found nothing 2) You weren't even brave enough to see if there was any evidence to support your claim that Keith Olbermann lied.
About Glenn Beck? I have seen plenty of proof of his lies, thank you.
I've encountered it many times. They make an accusation, you ask them for evidence, and they get all condescending on you. One of the regulars here used to say that he wasn't going to hold our hands and find it for us.
You are right....I've got nothing.
You got me!
Jake: "Prove it!"
Me: "Not my job. Go to Google."
You caught me.
narthuro, Silly boy! I also implied that Beck is a liar but you haven't asked me to "back it up". WHY?
We all know he lies and lies and lies, he must have learned it from the GOP.
Because it's not something at issue.
They agree with your implication.
They view the subject as closed and do not require further evidence to prove to them what they already feel is the truth. They need no convincing or supporting evidence.
The disagree with you on the Olbermann point, and as such are asking you to calrify your position. It's not an out-of-bounds request, especially given the reality that the two sides of this coversation have already, within this conversation, shown the ability to come to agreement.
Your refusal therefore comes across as crass and argumentative merely for the sake of remaining at odds.
"Olbermann lies."
"Ok, prove it."
"Here are a series of things YOU have to do to see that I'M right."
Sorry, I have better things to do. Either post a link to an Olbermann lie, and explain it, or shut the f-- up.
I am sorry I made you angry by using logic.
You have been able to educate yourself on Beck's lies now use that energy to educate yourself.....
I will now "shut the f-- up".
I do not think that you know what that word means.
Without a doubt that will be the funniest thing I'll read today.
Have you ever noticed the crowd of rubber-necks around a car crash? Ever noticed how they drift away as the novelty wears off and their curiosity wanes?
I havn't said I agree with Beck and I haven't lied about anything so what is your point?
I was just pointing out that you can also get lots of people gawping at a car crash but, as I suspect is the case with Beck's histrionics, the novelty wears off and the crowd wanders away.
And Jake? The "I'm defending Beck but that doesn't mean I agree with him" act got old years ago, as it's been done by countless trolls here. Give it a rest, find a fresh angle, or just go away, ok?
/snark
Sorry, Sara Palin is still with FOX.
Very good and funny.
Your playbook:
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.
Lie Big, Retract Quietly
Unconfirmed Or Controlled Sources As Fact
Calculated Omission
Distraction, and the Manufacture of Relevance
Dishonest Debate Tactics”
Minimize your MMFA screen (I know this will be difficult for you).
Put down the kool aid so both hands will be free.
Open another internet screen.
type in the word GOOGLE or BING and hit enter.
Now you can search Olbermann lies or Beck lies
Enjoy results.
Drink kool aid
How many people do you think peace4all is?
And you are lecturing other people about education?
When you make a claim, like Olberman lies, you normally have to back up said claim.
Nobody is going to do that for you. You made the claim, and you're confident in said claim, show the proof. It shouldn't be that hard should it?
Even if I cited documented examples I would probably still be called a liar; which has happened in the past by persons on this blog.
so forgive us for treating you like some kind of moran because, well... you know.
Try to stay on topic.
When you start name calling it shows you have no facts to back up what you are saying.
I forgive you!
Now, show me where I am wrong or have lied about THIS TOPIC.
Also, I think you miss quoted me about the Beck and the Constitution comment. I await your correction or apology. :) Or prove me wrong!
and that, dear boy, is on topic.
"there is simply no reason to engage in any discussion with you over anything"
If there is no reason then why did you respond? AND
No, Your not on topic. The topic is that I implied that Beck and Olberman are liars and I have been asked to prove Olberman is a liar.
You then refer to a comment I made several weeks ago about Beck and the Constitution! Hmmmm....not on topic silly boy.
AND you did not quote me correctly either (when you went off topic)
C'mon oneleft, get it together.
Jake: "prove it."
Me: "I could send you countless links, but you would still discount them, so there is no point."
A few minutes later:
Me: "Jake is a liar. You are just mad because I am using logic in my arguments."
See who is laughing now, Glennie.
Eventually, people will stop buying his idiotic books, stop attending his moribund performances, and tune to other right-wing haters on the radio.
I wonder how Glennie will keep "The Blaze" going, since it will not make a profit. Oh, it's not in debt, Glennie says, but that's only because Mercury supports it. As Glennie's Mercury loses more income, how long do you think Glennie will be able to continue paying that "former Huffington Post" CEO/Idiot that Glennie keeps bragging about?
Plus, Glennie, in my experience, CEOs, publishers, etc., know little about how to make a real profit, how to run a real news organization. They are just ties in suits and pants suits who climb the social-corporate-dog-eat-dog ladder, whether they are from Huff or The Wall Street Journal. Same type of primordial creature, even at your hometown small daily newspaper. Give them a morality test, and most would fail miserably, since most lie about numbers.
And Glennie's radio show is more like a frat-house/grade-school/chummy show with a lot of giggly-go moments, and moments when Pat and the other airhead suddenly are silent as Glennie gives us his grand viewpoints, and deep-voice Pat sits there in sycophantic silence (thanking his Mormon God cult) that he was guided to Glennie as a friend.
Pathetic. Beck is done. His empire is shrinking. He will go back to radio and the Web and continue ripping off his cult of followers; however, they may even eventually figure out what a pothead this guy really is. Blowing smoke out his butt and mouth, so much so, I can see the flames coming out his nose and ears.
Soon, he'll have a pitchfork with which to pursue progressives! Remember all those pitchforks he asked for on TV? Anyone ever wonder why?
I agree that at least longterm he will be limited to web and radio where his hardcore fans will provide income for him. As you said generating revenues on the web is difficult, especially if companies dont like to place ads next to your name. He simply needs to be on TV. Without it he loses his most important cross marketing tool. If and when he loses the show on Fox that will have huge impact on him financially obviously.
It is a long way to go till November 2012. I can imagine several scenarios till than. One is him taking a break (maybe with a nice story attached to it about Glenn having an illness), what I find right now very unlikely is that Beck wont be around to campaing against Obama on TV.
But there is hope for you. I know that Glennie is your Messiah but try not watching him for a week. (And no, God won't punish you if you don't.) Go for a walk outside to clear your head---with your mom's permission of course. Read a newspaper. Research Glennies "facts" on the Internet to see what bullcrap they really are. Be around normal people. I think it will do you a world of good. You don't have to be the village idiot all of your life. You CAN change. Good luck! :-)
It just goes to show that like George Romero's zombies, even conservatives know the same ol' $h!t when they see it enough.
It's called a cycle - climate change.
As Beck consistently draws in the 1.6-1.8 million range, his value over a replacement host becomes zero. Coupled with the lower than market rates Fox is getting from ad buys on the show (thanks to the boycott efforts), Glenn Beck could be quickly pushed back into a radio only echo chamber.