About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Glenn Beck Limps Into 2011 With Falling Ratings

January 27, 2011 9:07 am ET by Eric Boehlert

What a difference one year makes.

Just about 52 weeks ago, Fox News’ Glenn Beck was poised at the onset of a early 2010 ratings wave that propelled his daily show to news heights. Through late January and into early February  2010, Glenn Beck drew nearly three million viewers each night, making it at times the most-watched program on cable news.

Glenn Beck had been hot for months, no doubt about that. Back in August, 2009, Beck flirted with the mighty three million-viewer mark, and through most of the remaining months that year his program averaged approximately 2.5 million viewers, or more,  each night.

But in January and February of last year, something popped and Glenn Beck became a monster ratings hit, drawing three million fans a night

Fast forward twelve months and Glenn Beck is having troubling drawing two million fans each night, let alone three.  In fact, through the first three weeks of the year, Beck’s show topped the two million mark only three times out of the first 15 episodes that aired.  

I’ve been monitoring Beck’s ratings for some time and I cannot recall a streak of weeks like this where he’s so consistently fallen below two million viewers. This is definitely new territory for Glenn Beck.  I don’t know if it’s the utter sameness of the show that’s driving former viewers away, but the air is clearly seeping out. Between November and the first three weeks of January, Glenn Beck has lost, on average, nearly 500,000 viewers. 

Or put another way, the days of Glenn Beck drawing three million viewers are long gone. And they’re never coming back. But at this rate, the two-million viewership mark seems to be slipping away, too. Glenn Beck  now routinely flirts with ratings in the 1.6-1.8 million range, which is almost exactly half  the rating Beck was getting one year ago.  In truth, that’s how many viewers Glenn Beck used to attract when the host was on vacation and somebody less famous stood in for him.  Now that’s how many tune in when he’s there in the studio.

Also, consider the mountain of media attention Beck basked in during the last twelve months and how he’s supposed to be the point person for a grassroots American movement. And then realize his audience is down 50% from where it was 12 months ago. Kind of weird, right? 

And yes, the decline comes in the wake of news that Beck’s nationally syndicated radio show was recently yanked out of two of the countries largest markets, New York and Philadelphia.

Truth is, Beck’s current ratings wilt stretches back to last December and late November. And really, ever since the midterm elections, Glenn Beck has fallen to a ratings plateau that the program hasn’t flirted with in well over a year. Beck’s rating average for all of last year was 2.25 million viewers,  according to Nielsen. But you would have to be back to the week of Nov. 11- Nov. 19 to find when Glenn Beck actually hit that number on a Monday-to-Friday basis. Since mid-November, Beck’s numbers have been down consistently.

And that’s despite the big media pushes Beck  tried to orchestrate in December by taking his live radio and TV show to Wilmington, Ohio, and that’s despite the huge news story surrounding the Tucson gun massacre in which Beck was featured when the focus turned to today’s far-right anti-government rhetoric. Despite the newsworthy events, Beck’s ratings never spiked. Instead, they remain consistently below his 2010 average as he continues to limp into 2011.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by overmars jr. (January 27, 2011 9:13 am ET)
      23 1
      And if his viewership is cut in half again this year, it would be both great and still not enough of a fall.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rkcomments (January 27, 2011 2:16 pm ET)
        3 1
        Evidence that even the morons who watch FNC can get tired of hearing the same BS repeated day-in and day-out.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by TicoRey (January 28, 2011 1:59 am ET)
            1
          Ah well, would would anyone expect to hear from a moronic left-winger. Get smart, NBC isn't helping you any.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by sdlf (January 29, 2011 12:09 pm ET)
        1  
        Interesting.....and where does he stand in the ratings against the other news shows because in the end that's what matters....if he's #1 its irrelevant.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by einreb (January 27, 2011 9:13 am ET)
      19  
      Hence the chain saw and the rabbit. Now it makes sense.*





      *"Makes sense" being a relative term when applied to the Glenn Beck school of psychosis.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DNA (January 27, 2011 10:20 am ET)
        13  
        I thought the chainsaw and the rabbit did absolutely nothing to accentuate his point which was - dah, I don't know.

        The man is a MONSTER who has affected the lives of others and their relationships adversely. He needs to be taken off the air before he does some real damage.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by WilliamHolden (January 27, 2011 10:28 am ET)
        7  
        Someone posted a comment on HuffPo and described as use of confusion technique which, no joke, is actually a technique in manipulating someone.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 27, 2011 9:17 am ET)
      15  
      What I'm wondering is whether or not Nostradumbass will try to rescue Simple Sarah from her "Sputnik WTF Moment".

      He's the only one who can do it with a straight face. Surely he can weave a conspiracy theory that warps the 50-year old, well-worn analogy into a secret message that Obama wants us to be like the Soviet Union.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (January 27, 2011 9:26 am ET)
      13  
      I geuss his cultists are starting to figure out that every single episode can't possibly be the most important one you will ever see?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (January 27, 2011 9:47 am ET)
        11  
        Or that, 'I'll have all the answers tonight' schtick... and then he just talks like a muppet.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NoTrueScotsman (January 27, 2011 10:20 am ET)
          13  
          Beck is like the furniture store Haynes. Since my younger years they have continuously had "FINAL LAST CHANCE GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALE!"s. Eventually you come to understand that it is a ploy.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by uncle.billy (January 27, 2011 9:26 am ET)
      10  
      Becky's schtick is stale...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Major Tom (January 27, 2011 9:27 am ET)
      9  
      "average as he continues to limp into 2001."

      ERR 2011... But if he had it his way he'd make it 2001 again.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (January 27, 2011 9:28 am ET)
        10  
        Otherwise... One can't help but see this as news that the first amendment has prevailed and America has rejected Right Wing BS.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Bob Stanley (January 27, 2011 9:39 am ET)
      9  
      At some point in the near future he'll adopt another new persona and pretend that this one (Ready-to-snap Glenn Beck) didn't exist:

      1. Morning Zoo DJ Glenn Beck √
      2. Christmas Sweater Glenn Beck √
      3. Ready-to-snap Glenn Beck
      4. ?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (January 27, 2011 9:46 am ET)
        11  
        You forgot Black Robe Regiment Religious Revivalist prophet/ Brother Beck...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (January 27, 2011 9:39 am ET)
      9  
      Instead of MMfA asking, "Who's still advertising on Glenn Beck's show?" maybe they should change the question:

      "Who's still watching Glenn Beck's show?"

      I'm sure listing all the viewers wouldn't take up too much space.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (January 27, 2011 9:48 am ET)
      12  
      You can only cry "wolf" so many times before people finally stop listening.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2011 10:10 am ET)
      6 17
      In my opinion his ratings when he started were inflated and they are now coming back down to something more reasonable for his time slot. Remember, he debuted on Fox News when Obama was inaugurated.

      I used to watch his show all the time after the Presidential election. I watch maybe one episode a week now. It's not that I dislike Beck now, it's just I'm not as interested in watching political television period.

      I would argue he had no business drawing 3 million viewers from 5pm to begin with. We'll see in 2012 if his ratings go back up or if they remain the same.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NoTrueScotsman (January 27, 2011 10:27 am ET)
        11  
        Good point, there was a lot of hype around his show when it first came on Fox, and he did offer a different format than the other shows on the station. I think the bloom fell off when each episode became interchangable.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by JoeSixpack (January 27, 2011 10:51 am ET)
        14 1
        So... you spend more time defending Beck that actually watching him. Weird.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (January 27, 2011 11:05 am ET)
        6  
        We'll see in 2012 if his ratings go back up or if they remain the same. - MagCynic

        First his show will have to make it to 2012. That's not a sure thing.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:11 am ET)
          2 16
          His numbers are double his competition so they will have to fall off ALLOT for him not to make it in 2012.

          If he is cancelled, like another loud mouth idiot got cancelled recently, it will be because he says or does something so off the wall FOX can't defend him.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ScienceBuff (January 27, 2011 11:32 am ET)
            8  
            Is there anything Beck could say that Fox wouldn't defend? I'm not positive that there's a limit.

            If his numbers continue to fall, even if they're beating the competition, I could see Fox replacing him if they believe someone else could do better. Given Fox's greater availability and more dedicated audience, he'd be in big trouble if he started getting close to Matthews' numbers.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by SoloPocono (January 27, 2011 12:49 pm ET)
              3  
              I agree. Hey, ya never know, maybe if Fox replaced Beck with a Team-up of Sister Sarah & Sister Michelle, they'd get all their sponsors back!!
              AND, they could always just "demote" Beck & he could be a guest on the S & M show, with Pastor Beck!!
              Ju$t THINK of the rating$!!
              (to Fox TV trolls: hint-hint)
              Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (January 27, 2011 11:55 am ET)
        11  
        His shtick is getting tired. His material is redundant and regurgitated.

        Beck built his early ratings blast by swinging for the fences every single night. But the trouble is, you can only clear the fence so many times until people become unimpressed with the routine, leaving little choice but to move the fence further out. The farther it moves out, the greater the risk of a clear-cut Jack Lucas incident, something that no right-wing professional liar can afford.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by indigo1968 (January 27, 2011 12:53 pm ET)
          6  
          >>>His shtick is getting tired. His material is redundant and regurgitated.

          Well, so is Limbaugh's, but he's still got a hardcore fan base willing to swallow anything he shovels out despite it being exactly the same as yesterday and the day before, etc.

          Beck has his hardcore base as well. The only way he'll truly take a dive is if he does something that alienates his advertisers, and they begin to pull away in droves.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by highlyunlikely (January 27, 2011 3:56 pm ET)
            4  
            >>>His shtick is getting tired. His material is redundant and regurgitated.

            That's a good thing as far as his fans are concerned. They don't want anything new, different, or thoughtful: too hard to keep up.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by lehk (January 27, 2011 11:22 pm ET)
               
            Limbaugh has build his listener base by being an angry, arrogant ass.

            Beck is a crybaby and a twerp, he will not hold the same loyalty.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Major Tom (January 27, 2011 2:21 pm ET)
          5  
          You can't be outraged every day day in and day out... eventually, you become jaded.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by n'est-ce pas (January 27, 2011 10:08 pm ET)
        1  
        Well reasoned and rational point, MagCynic.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (January 27, 2011 10:28 am ET)
      8  
      This is the time of the year when companies buy commercials,and models get in shape to appear in them...Some who bought commercials on Glen Beck last year will feel like they have been fooled because his numbers dropped.They have passed the word to others who buy commercials.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WilliamHolden (January 27, 2011 10:36 am ET)
      5  
      So ratings dropping, on MM it was mentioned Fox could earn more than half a million bucks in ads per week since hundreds of companies refuse to run ad in Becks timeslot.

      Seems a must to keep him on air if they still contuining with him at that high price.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 27, 2011 10:59 am ET)
      12 1
      One possible explanation is that more and more viewers are beginning to believe Glenn Beck is psychotic.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:04 am ET)
        1 17
        In your opinion he may be psychotic but he still has twice any many viewers as his competition.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cst (January 27, 2011 11:17 am ET)
          16  
          He could be getting TEN times the ratings of his competition; it still wouldn't turn his lies into truth, would it?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:28 am ET)
            1 19
            Maybe "his lies" will be be his demise just like Olberman?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (January 27, 2011 11:28 am ET)
              16 1
              What lies did Olbermann tell?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:41 am ET)
                2 15
                None. :)

                Or you could have an open mind and do your own research.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by epkklk851 (January 27, 2011 11:56 am ET)
                  13  
                  Have an open mind, do my own research, Keith was occasionally over the top in a description, but his stories were essentially correct. Pleas show me some specific instances where he lied.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:24 pm ET)
                      18
                    You seem to have been able to educate yourself on Becks lies, now educate yourself on Olbermans lies. Why do you need me to show you?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by The_Cat (January 27, 2011 1:10 pm ET)
                      11  
                      You made the claim, jake5. The burden of proof lies with you. Produce the lies Olbermann told, or STFU. Pretty simple, right?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 1:22 pm ET)
                          12
                        It was very simple The_Cat.

                        I educated myself by going to other sources besides MMFA. You should try it.

                        I also implied that Beck has lied. Why haven't you asked me for that proof?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by The_Cat (January 27, 2011 7:16 pm ET)
                          8  
                          It was very simple The_Cat.

                          I educated myself by going to other sources besides MMFA. You should try it.

                          I also implied that Beck has lied. Why haven't you asked me for that proof?


                          I'm not going to research YOUR argument. You are too lazy to do so yourself, so one of two things is likely true. 1) You searched and found nothing 2) You weren't even brave enough to see if there was any evidence to support your claim that Keith Olbermann lied.

                          About Glenn Beck? I have seen plenty of proof of his lies, thank you.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by nerzog (January 27, 2011 2:02 pm ET)
                        11  
                        I guess they teach this dodge at Right Wing Troll School.

                        I've encountered it many times. They make an accusation, you ask them for evidence, and they get all condescending on you. One of the regulars here used to say that he wasn't going to hold our hands and find it for us.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by MiniTru (January 27, 2011 1:11 pm ET)
                      10  
                      In other words, you've got nothing.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 1:24 pm ET)
                          6
                        Silly MiniTru,

                        You are right....I've got nothing.

                        You got me!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by epkklk851 (January 27, 2011 2:01 pm ET)
                          7  
                          Nice of you to admit it. By the way, I don't use MMFA as my source, I do my own research. I often post sources here. Where's your nothing?
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 2:40 pm ET)
                          4  
                          Me: "Jake5 lies."

                          Jake: "Prove it!"

                          Me: "Not my job. Go to Google."
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by mattcable250650 (January 27, 2011 3:16 pm ET)
                          3  
                          So why do you waste everyone's time when you've got nothing to back up your assertions with?
                          Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (January 27, 2011 11:23 am ET)
          13 1
          Are you ruling out the possibility that Glenn Beck is psychotic simply because he has more viewers than his competitors? How do you know whether many people watch Glenn BeckBECAUSE he may be psychotic...?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:30 am ET)
              16
            Yes, I am "ruling out the possibility that Glenn Beck is psychotic simply because he has more viewers than his competitors". That is exactly what I sayed/implied.

            You caught me.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 27, 2011 11:28 am ET)
          14 1
          Maybe his viewers are psychotic.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (January 27, 2011 11:32 am ET)
            11 1
            That's a distinct possibility...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:38 am ET)
                15
              You kids are funny.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 11:43 am ET)
                11  
                Still waiting for an example of the "lies" Olbermann told....
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:52 am ET)
                    14
                  Collapse the MMFA screen and bring up GOOGLE in a different window. When you have done that let me know and I will walk you through the next step.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:53 am ET)
                      13
                    Hold on jjamele2880, I didn't mean collapse, I meant minimize....hope I'm not to late :(
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by narthuro (January 27, 2011 12:16 pm ET)
                    13  
                    Traditionally, an accuser has to prove a statement he makes. So when you say "Olbermann lies!" you have to back it up with something. Otherwise, your statement's just a bunch of words, next-to-worthless.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:26 pm ET)
                        12

                      narthuro, Silly boy! I also implied that Beck is a liar but you haven't asked me to "back it up". WHY?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Getreal (January 27, 2011 2:42 pm ET)
                           
                        You don't have to prove Beck lies
                        We all know he lies and lies and lies, he must have learned it from the GOP.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by AZ (January 28, 2011 12:19 pm ET)
                           
                        "I also implied that Beck is a liar but you haven't asked me to "back it up". WHY?"

                        Because it's not something at issue.

                        They agree with your implication.

                        They view the subject as closed and do not require further evidence to prove to them what they already feel is the truth. They need no convincing or supporting evidence.

                        The disagree with you on the Olbermann point, and as such are asking you to calrify your position. It's not an out-of-bounds request, especially given the reality that the two sides of this coversation have already, within this conversation, shown the ability to come to agreement.

                        Your refusal therefore comes across as crass and argumentative merely for the sake of remaining at odds.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 12:38 pm ET)
                      12  
                      Typical troll-

                      "Olbermann lies."

                      "Ok, prove it."

                      "Here are a series of things YOU have to do to see that I'M right."

                      Sorry, I have better things to do. Either post a link to an Olbermann lie, and explain it, or shut the f-- up.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:51 pm ET)
                          13
                        jjamele2880,

                        I am sorry I made you angry by using logic.

                        You have been able to educate yourself on Beck's lies now use that energy to educate yourself.....

                        I will now "shut the f-- up".
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by MiniTru (January 27, 2011 1:13 pm ET)
                          4  
                          If only...
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by highlyunlikely (January 27, 2011 3:58 pm ET)
                            4  
                            There he goes with the "angry" and "silly" again. Sounds like jake needs new material more than Beck does.
                            Report Abuse
                        • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 2:04 pm ET)
                          4  
                          "Logic?"

                          I do not think that you know what that word means.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by ScienceBuff (January 27, 2011 2:20 pm ET)
                          7  
                          I am sorry I made you angry by using logic. - jake5

                          Without a doubt that will be the funniest thing I'll read today.
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by mattcable250650 (January 27, 2011 3:18 pm ET)
                    2  
                    In other words, y'all have got zip for proof.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (January 27, 2011 11:43 am ET)
              4  
              We haven't been able to rule it out yet.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by grmce (January 27, 2011 12:46 pm ET)
          6  
          jake5,
          In your opinion he may be psychotic but he still has twice any many viewers as his competition.
          Have you ever noticed the crowd of rubber-necks around a car crash? Ever noticed how they drift away as the novelty wears off and their curiosity wanes?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:54 pm ET)
              10
            grmce I stated a fact that is backed up by the numbers. What does that have to do with a "car crash"?

            I havn't said I agree with Beck and I haven't lied about anything so what is your point?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grmce (January 27, 2011 2:56 pm ET)
              3  
              You're touting his viewer stats as validation.

              I was just pointing out that you can also get lots of people gawping at a car crash but, as I suspect is the case with Beck's histrionics, the novelty wears off and the crowd wanders away.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 3:01 pm ET)
                6  
                Clearly your analogy was way too complicated for Jake to get.

                And Jake? The "I'm defending Beck but that doesn't mean I agree with him" act got old years ago, as it's been done by countless trolls here. Give it a rest, find a fresh angle, or just go away, ok?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by grmce (January 27, 2011 8:53 pm ET)
                  4  
                  It's a long time since I taught slow learners - must brush up on my "how to explain moderately complex reasoning to people who aren't quite up to it" technique.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:06 am ET)
        16
      Maybe if his numbers continue drop FOX will cancel him. Kind of like another loud mouth liar got dropped recently?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dtate1965 (January 27, 2011 11:21 am ET)
           
        I didn't hear that they canned O'Reilly!

        /snark
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (January 27, 2011 11:23 am ET)
        11  
        Who would that be? If you are talking about Olbermann, Beck is not even drawing 2 million now. Which is where Olbermann was. But as Rupert has shown by keeping Beck on without advertisers, the propaganda is far more important than the actual show.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Pinhead (January 27, 2011 11:43 am ET)
        10  
        Maybe if his numbers continue drop FOX will cancel him. Kind of like another loud mouth liar got dropped recently?


        Sorry, Sara Palin is still with FOX.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:45 am ET)
            13
          Palin doesn't have a show with FOX.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:47 am ET)
            3 10
            Oh, I get it. You weren't taking the previous conversation in context. You were adding your own context.

            Very good and funny.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (January 27, 2011 11:45 am ET)
        5  
        I wouldn't consider John Gibson's demise "recent."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (January 27, 2011 11:46 am ET)
          3  
          Otherwise, you're right.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 11:50 am ET)
              9
            Thank you for agreeing with me. :)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by veritas234 (January 27, 2011 9:44 pm ET)
                 
              Your perfect portrayal of a tr0ll gets no applause from me. You are like Beck. Psychotic and dishonest and always manage to put the blame elsewhere. But when your ass might get into a sling you all panic. There have never been so manywingnuts on liberal websites since right after the Tuscon shootings. Before anyone said a word they were all screaming it wasn't me. That told me that the misinfo and hate you spread is absolutely on purpose. Your posts through this thread are like a grammar school kid that got caught smoking. You should go back to Klown Kollege for a refresher.
              Your playbook:
              “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

              A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.

              Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.

              A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.

              If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.

              Lie Big, Retract Quietly
              Unconfirmed Or Controlled Sources As Fact

              Calculated Omission

              Distraction, and the Manufacture of Relevance

              Dishonest Debate Tactics”
              Report Abuse
      • Author by peace4all (January 27, 2011 12:02 pm ET)
        10  
        you like to toss around accusations but can't back them up. please show us where keith lied. and i don't mean some made up store at world nut daily.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:16 pm ET)
          1 13
          peace4all ,

          Minimize your MMFA screen (I know this will be difficult for you).
          Put down the kool aid so both hands will be free.
          Open another internet screen.
          type in the word GOOGLE or BING and hit enter.
          Now you can search Olbermann lies or Beck lies
          Enjoy results.
          Drink kool aid
          Report Abuse
          • Author by peace4all (January 27, 2011 12:37 pm ET)
            9  
            i see. so you have no examples so you try and send me on your wild goose chase. nice try.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 12:47 pm ET)
              3 1
              Pretty sad, isn't it?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:58 pm ET)
                  12
                Yes, it is sad. Hopefully peace4all will take the time to educate themselves.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 2:01 pm ET)
                  7  
                  Hopefully peace4all will take the time to educate themselves

                  How many people do you think peace4all is?

                  And you are lecturing other people about education?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (January 27, 2011 4:32 pm ET)
                  4  
                  You sir, are ignorant.

                  When you make a claim, like Olberman lies, you normally have to back up said claim.

                  Nobody is going to do that for you. You made the claim, and you're confident in said claim, show the proof. It shouldn't be that hard should it?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 4:43 pm ET)
                      8
                    I also said Beck is a liar but you don't seem intrested in my proof on that subject. WHY?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by n'est-ce pas (January 27, 2011 10:13 pm ET)
                      5  
                      Probably because Beck's lies are so numerous and pervasive, that we get at least one article a day on MMfA. The claims that Olbermann lies never pan out. MSNBC has actual journalistic ethics, which is why the false equivalency between their programming and Fox News's is so much hokum. Fox is nothing more than propaganda. I really don't think anyone can make a case to the contrary.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 4:44 pm ET)
                      8
                    Here we go with the name calling again. Everytime someone on this blog can't back up what they say they start calling names.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by n'est-ce pas (January 28, 2011 8:16 am ET)
                      3  
                      I do both, wingnut. And really, Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle. You haven't backed up anything you've said.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 12:57 pm ET)
                10
              Did you go on a "wild goose chase" to find out about Glenn Becks lies?

              Even if I cited documented examples I would probably still be called a liar; which has happened in the past by persons on this blog.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by oneleft (January 27, 2011 1:42 pm ET)
                8  
                my dear jake5. you are the one that tried to argue that beck knows the constitution by heart because you saw him on tv reciting some of it. that was your argument. you witnessed it on tv.

                so forgive us for treating you like some kind of moran because, well... you know.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 1:53 pm ET)
                    7
                  oneleft,

                  Try to stay on topic.

                  When you start name calling it shows you have no facts to back up what you are saying.

                  I forgive you!

                  Now, show me where I am wrong or have lied about THIS TOPIC.

                  Also, I think you miss quoted me about the Beck and the Constitution comment. I await your correction or apology. :) Or prove me wrong!


                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by oneleft (January 27, 2011 2:00 pm ET)
                    3  
                    ah pumpkin, i'm not here to play your game with you. you can get all bent out of shape and whatnot but i refuse to play with you. you see, your argument about glennie and him knowing the constitution by heart was so lame that there is simply no reason to engage in any discussion with you over anything.

                    and that, dear boy, is on topic.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jake5 (January 27, 2011 4:41 pm ET)
                        6
                      oneleftsays,

                      "there is simply no reason to engage in any discussion with you over anything"

                      If there is no reason then why did you respond? AND
                      No, Your not on topic. The topic is that I implied that Beck and Olberman are liars and I have been asked to prove Olberman is a liar.

                      You then refer to a comment I made several weeks ago about Beck and the Constitution! Hmmmm....not on topic silly boy.

                      AND you did not quote me correctly either (when you went off topic)

                      C'mon oneleft, get it together.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by oneleft (January 28, 2011 6:53 am ET)
                        2  
                        The point is that anyone who thinks that he witnessed something on tv so it's true is a simpleton. Your proof that beck knows the constitution by heart is because you saw him do it on tv. Who can argue with something like that? Pretty much makes any further discussion an exercise in futility.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (January 27, 2011 2:06 pm ET)
                    1  
                    This from the person when asked to provide KO lies hasn't produced diddly. I guess like all wingnuts it's time to declare victory and move on.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by veritas234 (January 27, 2011 9:45 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Typical conservative "debating" point: avoid the question, change the subject, and attack the questioner.”
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (January 27, 2011 3:04 pm ET)
                1  
                Me: "Jake is a liar."

                Jake: "prove it."

                Me: "I could send you countless links, but you would still discount them, so there is no point."

                A few minutes later:

                Me: "Jake is a liar. You are just mad because I am using logic in my arguments."
                Report Abuse
      • Author by highlyunlikely (January 27, 2011 4:01 pm ET)
        3  
        It's an interesting comparison. Olbermann was "dropped" for reasons having nothing to do with his ratings. Beck's still on for reasons having nothing to do with his numbers. In the first case ratings didn't save him. In the second, ratings couldn't kill (yes, a metaphor) him.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Avicenna (January 27, 2011 12:05 pm ET)
      11 1
      Although he made fun of Keith Olbermann's ratings, it looks like Glenn Beck's Fox tenure will not be as long as Olbermann's was on MSNBC.

      See who is laughing now, Glennie.

      Eventually, people will stop buying his idiotic books, stop attending his moribund performances, and tune to other right-wing haters on the radio.

      I wonder how Glennie will keep "The Blaze" going, since it will not make a profit. Oh, it's not in debt, Glennie says, but that's only because Mercury supports it. As Glennie's Mercury loses more income, how long do you think Glennie will be able to continue paying that "former Huffington Post" CEO/Idiot that Glennie keeps bragging about?

      Plus, Glennie, in my experience, CEOs, publishers, etc., know little about how to make a real profit, how to run a real news organization. They are just ties in suits and pants suits who climb the social-corporate-dog-eat-dog ladder, whether they are from Huff or The Wall Street Journal. Same type of primordial creature, even at your hometown small daily newspaper. Give them a morality test, and most would fail miserably, since most lie about numbers.

      And Glennie's radio show is more like a frat-house/grade-school/chummy show with a lot of giggly-go moments, and moments when Pat and the other airhead suddenly are silent as Glennie gives us his grand viewpoints, and deep-voice Pat sits there in sycophantic silence (thanking his Mormon God cult) that he was guided to Glennie as a friend.

      Pathetic. Beck is done. His empire is shrinking. He will go back to radio and the Web and continue ripping off his cult of followers; however, they may even eventually figure out what a pothead this guy really is. Blowing smoke out his butt and mouth, so much so, I can see the flames coming out his nose and ears.

      Soon, he'll have a pitchfork with which to pursue progressives! Remember all those pitchforks he asked for on TV? Anyone ever wonder why?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by WilliamHolden (January 28, 2011 9:39 am ET)
        2  
        Tough to say when the big honchos at FOX decide his ratings are so bad that it doesnt make sense anymore to keep him on air. On his website I read yesterday they are going to improve their page and that they added S.E.Cupp. Also, Beck is connected to the posh and exclusive network of the Koch brothers. I have no doubt Beck did and is doing them a great service for their political strategy against the Obama-Administration.

        I agree that at least longterm he will be limited to web and radio where his hardcore fans will provide income for him. As you said generating revenues on the web is difficult, especially if companies dont like to place ads next to your name. He simply needs to be on TV. Without it he loses his most important cross marketing tool. If and when he loses the show on Fox that will have huge impact on him financially obviously.

        It is a long way to go till November 2012. I can imagine several scenarios till than. One is him taking a break (maybe with a nice story attached to it about Glenn having an illness), what I find right now very unlikely is that Beck wont be around to campaing against Obama on TV.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by gman004 (January 28, 2011 9:41 am ET)
          5
        I am, and many others are laughing,at you! What morons you progressives are, Glen beck has lost more viewers than Ed,Olberman,Matthews and O Donell ever had or ever will have. Wake up to reality,Ed is now stuck at 10 pm due to his poor ratings and hate speeches,and the replacement is just as bad,and what can you say about homoolberman,he got fired and deserved to get fired.Watch Glen beck at 5pm and maybe you will see why he constantly destroys the competition,he is for truth,justice and freedom which he sees slipping away every month due to the Obama agenda of crippling us and leveling the playing field.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Rsw58 (January 29, 2011 10:56 am ET)
          3  
          gman004, you are a perfect example of what happens when people drink the Glenn Beck Kool Aid too much. They become clinically brain-dead.
          But there is hope for you. I know that Glennie is your Messiah but try not watching him for a week. (And no, God won't punish you if you don't.) Go for a walk outside to clear your head---with your mom's permission of course. Read a newspaper. Research Glennies "facts" on the Internet to see what bullcrap they really are. Be around normal people. I think it will do you a world of good. You don't have to be the village idiot all of your life. You CAN change. Good luck! :-)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (January 27, 2011 12:26 pm ET)
      6  
      Glenn Beck is the barking loony who makes all the other loonies look plausible.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mata ruach (January 27, 2011 12:38 pm ET)
      5  
      Dear Mr. Soros. It looks like the plot is working! Soon, we and our Jewish banker friends will be able to take over the New World Order, as soon as Beck is out of the way. Thanks very much!!! (P.S. It must have been difficult to make all those viewers turn off Herr Beck at the same time. Are you practicing mind control? It's the fluoride isn't it? Hehheheheheh )
      Report Abuse
      • Author by banjo (January 27, 2011 4:13 pm ET)
           
        Beck has a following just like Jim Jones had, that's why I tape and watch his show, I don't want to miss the ending. He's slowly loosing his mind, and his followers are also.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cowboys8 (January 27, 2011 2:35 pm ET)
        1
      I just looked at the ratings for the other night.....all networks and I don't know if Glenn Becks ratings have fallen, but if they have its because all ratings have fallen. Fox news and Glenn continue to kick butt in the ratings everyday. They blow the other networks out of the water.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (January 27, 2011 5:11 pm ET)
      3  
      There was George Romero "Dead" movie a few years ago and it showed an evolutionary experience for the Zombies. Survivors who went outside of the city walls for supplies would use Fireworks to mesmerize the Zombies. Once the fireworks were launched the zombies would stare in the sky transfixed as survivors walked among them unhindered. Inevitably the zombies found the fireworks to be mundane and seemingly realized that the same old thing over and over was the same old thing over and over.

      It just goes to show that like George Romero's zombies, even conservatives know the same ol' $h!t when they see it enough.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Yogini (January 27, 2011 5:53 pm ET)
         
      Please boycott all of the rather lame sponsors that Glenn Beck currently has. He is just to disrespectful of everything to deserve a paycheck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtownsend150 (January 28, 2011 3:56 am ET)
      2 1
      MMFA ran this lame-ass story last January, too. After that, Beck's ratings went up in the Spring, dipped in the Summer, and went up in the Fall. People aren't as interested in politics in the New Year so everyone's ratings go down. The president's state of the union was down 11% - big deal. If you look at Beck's ratings over the last two years, they follow a constant pattern.

      It's called a cycle - climate change.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (January 28, 2011 4:42 pm ET)
        1
      beckie, did you change your drawers today????
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Michael Chase (January 28, 2011 10:24 pm ET)
        1
      The numbers here make me think of the Football Outsiders and their stats (no, this isn't spam). I think it is called value over replacement player.

      As Beck consistently draws in the 1.6-1.8 million range, his value over a replacement host becomes zero. Coupled with the lower than market rates Fox is getting from ad buys on the show (thanks to the boycott efforts), Glenn Beck could be quickly pushed back into a radio only echo chamber.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by me8pizza (January 29, 2011 1:59 am ET)
      1 1
      Maybe the children are just getting tired of watching Sesame Street. Maybe they're actually growing up and getting wise.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Beethical (January 29, 2011 10:12 am ET)
      1 1
      Glenn Beck isn't falling fast enough for me! It seems the only way these lying conservative talk show hosts will really suffer is to get in trouble with their own advertizers, networks, etc. I'm still hoping conservatives will wake up and see them for what they really are and are trying to do to the political process. It's so shameful.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rsw58 (January 29, 2011 10:35 am ET)
      1 1
      This article put a smile on my face. It's nice to know the egotistical blowhard is losing viewers. But I guess it was inevitable since he is such a one-trick pony. His constant dire warnings about a violent progressive take-over "any day now" is no doubt starting to get old--even for his braindead viewers. After all he has been saying that for TWO YEARS. I see his rating continuing to drop. Not that he still won't have his die-hard idiotic fans mind you. He will always have a million or so viewers. But at least he won't be able to brag about how he is a top cable draw anymore.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rick4646 (January 29, 2011 5:09 pm ET)
      1  
      Glenn, just like a lot of these other GOP pundits, are saying things so extreme that America is slowly catching on to their game. They try to scare everyone so bad with their name-calling, lies, and imagery; but now it is to the point to where even some hard-core conservatives are no longer giving the blind trust they once gave.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.