So They're Just Calling Michelle Obama Fat Now

yeah, Ann Coulter and her giant Adam's Apple!!!!

Go to their commentary box and you'll find pearls such as:

Cowboylogic says:

I just figured out how MooShelle plans to control Americas eating habits.
She plans on eating everything herself.

Talk about a master plan.

CrisD says:

Michelle IS getting fatter and fatter!!! She is eating up a storm!!!

skcusisolep says:

The moose-pig eating bacon must make the mooslum boy king a little uncomfortable.

Ever notice the size of the moose-pigs Bingo Wings?

Baloshka says:

There is not enough hair straightener in the world to make this thing look human.

Etc., Ad Nauseum.

No she's not overweight, just big boned....

Right on with you!!

She's using red ketchup! she's a communist! BURN HER!!!

It took me minute to notice anything but the ears. Not to play art critic, when there's so much other fail in this, but a good caricaturist knows how to slightly exaggerate a feature. This childish cartoon isn't really a good satire of anything but (unintentionally) right wingers problems with truth and moderation.

It's funny because everyone knows Obama, elitist that he is, only eats his burgers with mustard, which is how they eat burgers in Russia.

Quite frankly, I'm surprised the above cartoon didn't depict the Obamas eating watermelon and fried chicken.

I'd expect nothing less from Breitbart's crew.

so true!

History has shown that art from inclusive groups or societies is always vastly superior to those that are decidedly closed.

What does that matter? Is the first lady's weight now an important factor in a president's qualifications or ability to perform his job? Didn't think so, it's irrelevant and frankly, sexist.

Nope. Even the things they don't say or do is turned into something sinister.

I'm surprised she hasn't come over to steal the Sprite out of my pantry and knife the tires on my SUV.

and why is the cartoon so lame? not because it's a cheap shot but because it has no resemblance to the truth.

[Tea]

No, you see, we only pay for obesity because we spend taxes on inefficient socialist government programs.


If we'd just get out of the medical industry's way by lowering our corporate taxes and cutting back on regulation, supply-side Jesus would make sure everyone had the opportunity to raise themselves by their bootstraps, and then, once all the welfare leeches were off the dole, our corporations' enlightened self-interest would make our awesome medical system even better and give us a vaccine for obesity and diabetes, which would be kept cheap through an open and competitive market so that people could get at lower prices because there's less regulation.

It's so simple. Why do liberals hate fat people so much?

[/Tea]

Nobody would bat an eye at this over at BreitBart.

I don't believe you have the slightist idea of what a righty thinks. Just because you and your lefty freinds sit around giggling about evil thoughts you ascribe to righty doesn't make them real. If you want to know what one thinks, ask, they will be happy to tell you.

She is in good shape.

for a zebra

Obama will cross the line if he goes from recommending healthy foods to legislating we must only eat them.

"So They're Just Calling Michelle Obama Fat Now"
Where does it call her fat? Could it be MMFA has lied?

Um, did you even look at the cartoon? OK, you're right. The humor is incredibly bad, so I'll break it down for you. When they portray her as eating a mile-high pile of burgers while ignoring her husband and telling him to pass the bacon, that's a fat joke (a bad fat joke, but a fat joke, nonetheless). Which is pretty weird given that, from what I've seen, Michelle Obama doesn't have an ounce of extra fat on her. She may not be model skinny, but it seems like all muscle, not fat.

Where does it call her fat? Could it be MMFA has lied? Nah, never. - omg

Don't be disingenuous. They portray her with a body type MUCH larger than she actually has and show her stuffing a burgers and fries in her face. That is NOTHING other than calling her fat even if the word isn't there.

BTW, none of my biz what she eats. Don't care. Where we have a problem is when she tells us what to eat then turns around and eats what she just told us not to eat. - omg

Got an example of her doing that? Without it your hypocrisy argument doesn't exist.

So because Michelle eats a burger at a Super Bowl party, that gives you the right to portray her as an overeater?

"onementalgiant"? Not unless by "mental" you mean "mentally ill".

Where we have a problem is when she tells us what to eat then turns around and eats what she just told us not to eat.

Ah, so like so many on the right, you have a problem with a completely imaginary scenario. I'll say this slowly, so you can understand: MICHELLE OBAMA'S ADVOCACY INVOLVES EFFORTS TO PREVENT CHILDHOOD OBESITY. IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH FORCING ADULTS NOT TO EAT THINGS. I know it makes you hard to imagine being persecuted, but it gets boring after a while.

Recently someone on "Red State" referred to Michelle Obama's "fat arse" and called her and her husband other unpleasant names which I will not repeat here. They were referring to her appearance at the SOTU speech in a fitted sheath dress.

Hey, Mentalameoba? It's rather telling how you just zero in on on calling out MMFA that they are lying. Have you actually taken a hard look at the CARTOON? Probably not. That's because you are just like your fellow wing nuts. Does it even phase you as an American that the President and First Lady are drawn as if they would have been back in 1864? Depicting Obama as a half-man half-animal?

I suppose you also believe he's not a citizen and is Muslim. That's all you f#$%^ wing nuts have? New poll today: 51% of Republicans think Obama was born outside this country.

You Wing Nuts are pathetic. So scared. Must be a horrible existence.

Good for you, Gnatty. You've shown us that you do have a kind heart after all, what with the way that you consistently show respect for the feelings of stupid people by calling them "normal".

"Where we have a problem is when she tells us what to eat then turns around and eats what she just told us not to eat."

Hey onementalgiant, "an apple a day keeps the doctor away." Now, what did I just say? Did I tell you what you must eat, or mearly post some healthy eating information under your post? What I find so disturbing is not conservative views, but your patent inability to express your views without falsehoods. The First Lady hasn't ordered you to do a darn thing, so stop lying on her.

It's just a fantasy of the right that her healthy foods and exercise initiatives could possibly damage Obama's reelection chances. The only people worked up about it are clowns who would never vote for him anyway. There's not a person in the country for whom that would be a tipping point.

Concern troll is VERY concerned. Yes, I'm sure there are tons of key voters who were going to vote for Obama before their minds were changed by his wife saying children should eat healthier.

Obama's comment is interesting,

Oh suer, if by "interesting" you mean "stupid, made-up and completely nonsensical." In that case, yeah, it's ever so interesting. Just like your input. If you know people who base their voting decisions on stuff like this, then you know some very very idiotic people.

Are you sure it isn't one of those intentionally unfunny and thus, ironically hip cartoons they publish in the Onion? True, it doesn't have the little bald-headed guy making an even less funny quip at the end (parodying guys like Pat Oliphant and Tom Toles, of course), but, seriously, it's really hard to be this bad without trying. It usually takes a committed anti-genius like Jack Chick to do that.

What's wrong with promoting? Good god ... You yourself said that is a good thing and I'd be willing to bet there is no tax cut for nursing mothers in the works AT all.

Just as I suspected ... the only thing related to nursing mothers is in the Affordable Care Act - that employers provide break time for such and a place other than a bathroom that is private and out of public view for such. That's what happens when you read "articles" as opposed to real factual information.

Well the way the country is going; mothers will have to breast feed as baby formula will be too expensive for middle class Americans.

Although I hear the Chinese version of baby formula will be affordable if you don't mind feeding your baby formula with no nutritional value.

Really, you do need a nanny. Giving incentives for doing healthy things you are against? No where in your rant did I see Michelle Obama forcing anything on anyone. That was YOUR conclusion drawn straight from your arse like so many of the other things you've written. I call you a liar. I've worked in hospitals and with newborns and infants. Patients have a bill of rights and the hospital cannot, repeat, cannot force patients to do anything like you are alleging. If a nurse is calling a new mother bad for not breastfeeding that nurse should be reported and desciplined. If you know of such instances and are not reporting them you are just as guilty. Then again I call you a LIAR making s&*t up to make your point of attacking this administration. Sad. Quite frankly I am tired of people like YOU making judgements of other people based on your biased beliefs. I bet you were upset when Ronald Reagan in his quest to cut the cost had ketchup labeled a vegetable.

Michelle Obama is now promoting breastfeeding and offering tax cuts

Unless I'm missing something, Michelle Obama is not authorized to offer anyone tax cuts. I wonder what kind of articles you are reading.

Frankly, I'm sick of Mrs. Obmama and every other person in this administration thinking somehow they know what's best of the American people and we aren't capable of making decisions for ourselves.

Nancy Reagan "Just Say No!"
Barbara and Laura Bush both promoted literacy.

Every first lady has pushed a cause or initiative. I wonder why you're so against Michelle Obama's.

No Nanny Needed you are full of s&*t:

American Hospital Association

MANAGEMENT ADVISORY


A Patient’s Bill of Rights

A Patient's Bill of Rights was first adopted by the
American Hospital Association in 1973.

This revision was approved by the AHA Board of Trustees on October 21, 1992.


Introduction

Effective health care requires collaboration between patients and physicians and other health care professionals. Open and honest communication, respect for personal and professional values, and sensitivity to differences are integral to optimal patient care. As the setting for the provision of health services, hospitals must provide a foundation for understanding and respecting the rights and responsibilities of patients, their families, physicians, and other caregivers. Hospitals must ensure a health care ethic that respects the role of patients in decision making about treatment choices and other aspects of their care. Hospitals must be sensitive to cultural, racial, linguistic, religious, age, gender, and other differences as well as the needs of persons with disabilities.

The American Hospital Association presents A Patient's Bill of Rights with the expectation that it will contribute to more effective patient care and be supported by the hospital on behalf of the institution, its medical staff, employees, and patients. The American Hospital Association encourages health care institutions to tailor this bill of rights to their patient community by translating and/or simplifying the language of this bill of rights as may be necessary to ensure that patients and their families understand their rights and responsibilities.

Bill of Rights

These rights can be exercised on the patient’s behalf by a designated surrogate or proxy decision maker if the patient lacks decision-making capacity, is legally incompetent, or is a minor.

The patient has the right to considerate and respectful care.


The patient has the right to and is encouraged to obtain from physicians and other direct caregivers relevant, current, and understandable information concerning diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Except in emergencies when the patient lacks decision-making capacity and the need for treatment is urgent, the patient is entitled to the opportunity to discuss and request information related to the specific procedures and/or treatments, the risks involved, the possible length of recuperation, and the medically reasonable alternatives and their accompanying risks and benefits.

Patients have the right to know the identity of physicians, nurses, and others involved in their care, as well as when those involved are students, residents, or other trainees. The patient also has the right to know the immediate and long-term financial implications of treatment choices, insofar as they are known.


The patient has the right to make decisions about the plan of care prior to and during the course of treatment and to refuse a recommended treatment or plan of care to the extent permitted by law and hospital policy and to be informed of the medical consequences of this action. In case of such refusal, the patient is entitled to other appropriate care and services that the hospital provides or transfer to another hospital. The hospital should notify patients of any policy that might affect patient choice within the institution.


The patient has the right to have an advance directive (such as a living will, health care proxy, or durable power of attorney for health care) concerning treatment or designating a surrogate decision maker with the expectation that the hospital will honor the intent of that directive to the extent permitted by law and hospital policy.

Health care institutions must advise patients of their rights under state law and hospital policy to make informed medical choices, ask if the patient has an advance directive, and include that information in patient records. The patient has the right to timely information about hospital policy that may limit its ability to implement fully a legally valid advance directive.


The patient has the right to every consideration of privacy. Case discussion, consultation, examination, and treatment should be conducted so as to protect each patient's privacy.


The patient has the right to expect that all communications and records pertaining to his/her care will be treated as confidential by the hospital, except in cases such as suspected abuse and public health hazards when reporting is permitted or required by law. The patient has the right to expect that the hospital will emphasize the confidentiality of this information when it releases it to any other parties entitled to review information in these records.


The patient has the right to review the records pertaining to his/her medical care and to have the information explained or interpreted as necessary, except when restricted by law.


The patient has the right to expect that, within its capacity and policies, a hospital will make reasonable response to the request of a patient for appropriate and medically indicated care and services. The hospital must provide evaluation, service, and/or referral as indicated by the urgency of the case. When medically appropriate and legally permissible, or when a patient has so requested, a patient may be transferred to another facility. The institution to which the patient is to be transferred must first have accepted the patient for transfer. The patient must also have the benefit of complete information and explanation concerning the need for, risks, benefits, and alternatives to such a transfer.


The patient has the right to ask and be informed of the existence of business relationships among the hospital, educational institutions, other health care providers, or payers that may influence the patient's treatment and care.


The patient has the right to consent to or decline to participate in proposed research studies or human experimentation affecting care and treatment or requiring direct patient involvement, and to have those studies fully explained prior to consent. A patient who declines to participate in research or experimentation is entitled to the most effective care that the hospital can otherwise provide.


The patient has the right to expect reasonable continuity of care when appropriate and to be informed by physicians and other caregivers of available and realistic patient care options when hospital care is no longer appropriate.


The patient has the right to be informed of hospital policies and practices that relate to patient care, treatment, and responsibilities. The patient has the right to be informed of available resources for resolving disputes, grievances, and conflicts, such as ethics committees, patient representatives, or other mechanisms available in the institution. The patient has the right to be informed of the hospital's charges for services and available payment methods.
http://www.patienttalk.info/AHA-Patient_Bill_of_Rights.htm

As a OB/GYN nurse who has worked Postpartum/Mother-Baby for a number of years before

On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog.

Then again how can the first lady offer tax incentives since she doesn't legislate?

However, with that said, I have had many new moms that were very anxious and stressed trying to breastfeed when they really don't feel comfortable with doing this.

So it's not because of nursing mothers getting harrassed when they choose to nurse in public?

Big fat racist writes unfunny cartoon.

...I left out: can't find anything wrong with Michelle so you make stuff up.

Limbaugh is big and fat no one can argue about that. Most would say he's an idiot, but that's at least debatable...He's also an a-hole, but I guess Al thought putting that on the cover might inhibit sales.