About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Breitbart Bloggers Utterly Confused By Unraveled NPR Sting

March 21, 2011 3:18 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

Two weeks ago today conservative bloggers, especially those who post at sites run by Andrew Breitbart, were celebrating the release of James O'Keefe's NPR sting videos. Breitbart's Big Journalism outpost was especially enthusiastic in hyping the breaking story. 

But just a few days later Glenn Beck's website, The Blaze, helped pull back the curtain on the type of unethical editing O'Keefe used to push his gotcha onine. It was kind of a big deal

It's been 11 days since The Blaze published its damning analysis of O'Keefe's work, but have Breitbart bloggers been banned from mentioning that fact? And have they been banned from mentioning "The Blaze" at all? A search of Big Journalism's archives shows there's been just two blog references to The Blaze in all of March, and only one in the wake of the site's takedown of the NPR tapes. That single reference appeared as part of a cut-and-past quote from another source. Meaning, according to the archives, not one Breitbart blogger at Big Journalism has sat down and typed a direct reference to The Blaze in the context of the NPR sting. 

Keep in mind, Big Journalism boasts a lineup of more than 200 bloggers. But over the last week-and-a-half, not one of them has explicitly commented on how the O'Keefe tapes were analyzed by Glenn Beck's website. Coincidence? I doubt it. More likely, marching orders were issued for the site. 

Adding to the oddity is the fact some Breitbart bloggers are writing about the O'Keefe/NPR story and are now busy trying to prop it back up. They're just not acknowledging the most important part; that O'keefe used dishonest editing to push this story.

Instead, we get misguided passages like this from Big Journalism:

The genius of journalism is the cleverer you are in obtaining your story, the more successful you are. 

I don't even know what that means. But the Breitbart blogger continued: 

The Watergate reporters employed a number of tactics to garner lead after lead.  In recent years, Dateline’s “To Catch a Predator” profiled the creeps that lurk on the Internet connecting with underage kids.  

See, O'Keefe is just like Woodward and Bernstein. And O'Keefe is just like that NBC show that catches sexual predators. Why? Because O'Keefe videotaped an NPR fundraiser at lunch. 

Or something. 

The point is, by refusing to acknowledge that the NPR story took a dramatic turn for the worse (from O'Keefe's perspective), Breitbart bloggers not only confirm that they're propagandists, but they're also left holding the bag. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (March 21, 2011 3:35 pm ET)
      13  
      The genius of journalism is the cleverer you are in obtaining your story, the more successful you are.

      Well, that can be a factor... unless the premise of your story is bogus to begin with. Deceptively editing your footage isn't journalism... it's propaganda.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mattcable250650 (March 21, 2011 3:38 pm ET)
        4  
        Exactly! I would have added that "Of course, crossing ethical boundaries and taking other improper shortcuts can hurt far more than they can help and can make the journalist look like a creep and his or her story look like a hatchet job."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by m.welker (March 21, 2011 3:36 pm ET)
      10  
      Actually, the main genius of journalism is credibility and making sure you actually have a story, and not inventing one.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 21, 2011 3:47 pm ET)
      3  
      I haven't heard too much in the MSM about the fact that O'Keefe's video was once again deceptively edited.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (March 21, 2011 3:51 pm ET)
      2  
      Expect MagCynic to show up and explain how NPR is molesting liberty by luring small children into listening to nanny state broadcasts.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by highlyunlikely (March 21, 2011 4:29 pm ET)
        2  
        Probably not. He's on Beck duty at the con "think" tank and swamped with almost too many posts to keep track of.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (March 21, 2011 6:39 pm ET)
      1  
      "They're just not acknowledging the most important part; that O'keefe used dishonest editing to push this story."

      No, the most important part is that it's O'Keefe doing it, full stop. Once that fact is known, the video doesn't even need to be viewed. It is simply thrown out.

      Around here, we believe in personal responsibility. If you screw up like O'Keefe did, you pay. We aren't here to pass out amnesties.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (March 22, 2011 9:11 am ET)
           
        While I don't condone any editing of the tapes, It makes me wonder why he even had to do it? What the npr honcho said was damning enough in it's own right. Especially the part about npr surviving without the 3% federal funding.

        He knew it was inflammatory rhetoric and part of the reason heads rolled there. If it wasn't so cut and dried they why would npr chop heads?

        It's time npr defunded. They can survive on their Big Bird revenues alone.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.