About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Sexism Is Alive And Well At National Review

March 22, 2011 10:10 am ET by Jamison Foser

National Review's Mark Krikorian thinks it's just awful that women might play a role in making public decisions:

Look, I'm a sensitive New Age guy — I cook, I do laundry, I choke up at movies (well, Gladiator, anyway). But does anyone think our enemies abroad are as enlightened as we are about feminism? Steyn is right that the specific lesson they're learning is that nukes are the best insurance against invasion — but a broader one is that our commander-in-chief is an effete vacillator who is pushed around by his female subordinates. Prof. Althouse notes, "A feminist milestone: Our male President has been pulled into war by 3 women," and Senator Graham scored points with "I Thank God for Strong Women in the Obama Administration," but we're going to pay for this.

I don't know how much influence Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power had over the Obama administration's Libya policy, and neither does Mark Krikorian. What is clear is that Mark Krikorian thinks it is terrible that they are perceived as having been influential, and that it is terrible precisely because they are women. And no, I'm not over-interpreting Krikorian's comments -- he explicitly says this:

Before you send me any burning bras, the problem is not with women leaders — the enemies of the Virgin Queen and the Iron Lady can attest to that. The problem is not even with the president having strong female subordinates. Rather, Obama's pusillanimity has been hugely magnified by the contrast with the women directing his foreign policy and the fact that they nagged him to attack Libya until he gave in. Maybe it's unfair and there shouldn't be any difference from having a male secretary of state do the same thing, but there is.

Krikorian pretends that he doesn't (necessarily) think the influence of a female secretary of state should be viewed differently from the influence of a male secretary of state -- he's just describing the world as it is. But Krikorian's word choice gives him away: The three women, Krikorian writes, "nagged" Obama until he gave in. 

Let's be clear about this: Mark Krikorian isn't describing sexism, he's demonstrating it.

Previously: 

NRO's Krikorian on pronunciation of Sotomayor's name: "It Sticks in My Craw"

Mark Krikorian digs deeper

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (March 22, 2011 10:21 am ET)
      2  
      Wow. Just.... wow.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by K in VA (March 22, 2011 10:38 am ET)
      4  
      Actually, I suspect this is less about sexism and far, far more about portraying Obama as less than a "manly" man, to show that Obama lacks the biological attributes, if you get my drift, to make war, depending upon women instead to push him to "man up."

      Report Abuse
      • Author by borealis (March 22, 2011 12:56 pm ET)
        1  
        Hey, K: I agree with you on how Obama is being portrayed, but disagree on your dismissal of this as not sexism. The questioning of anyone's competence based solely on her or his perceived gender-related attributes is textbook sexism. Men can be victims of it just as women can.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by beDecent (March 22, 2011 11:24 am ET)
      1  
      So long as men continue to be brought up thinking they are the superior gender, there will be sexism.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (March 22, 2011 11:32 am ET)
      1  
      He chokes up at 'Gladiator?' Let's play the clip from 'Airplane!'...

      Captain Oveur: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by avedon (March 22, 2011 11:37 am ET)
      1 2
      What's most amazing about that article - and the following thread - is how no one ever wants to admit that Obama is following his own policies, vile as they might be.

      And that's just how Obama likes it. Obama has been telegraphing all of his crummy policies since even before the official start of his presidential campaign, but to this day the White House sends out leaks and statements to the effect that he is trying to find compromises with the Republicans or mediating between two opposing groups - and yet somehow he always ends up doing exactly what he said he wanted to do way back when. It's just that no one was paying attention. And he likes that, too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thebewilderness (March 22, 2011 1:43 pm ET)
      1  
      Look, I'm a sensitive New Age guy — I cook, I do laundry, I choke up at movies (well, Gladiator, anyway). But does anyone think our enemies abroad are as enlightened as we are about feminism?


      If his concept of feminism is about doing laundry, cooking, and choking up at movies, then I would say yes, our enemies abroad are every bit as enlightened about feminism as he is. Or, put another way, they are every bit as sexist as he is.

      Report Abuse