Glenn Beck Would Rather Talk About His Made-Up Foreclosure Crisis
March 23, 2011 1:15 pm ET by Jeremy Holden
Suddenly Glenn Beck cares about a foreclosure crisis. Just not a real one.
After months of ignoring an actual foreclosure crisis - one that could result in a $20 billion dollar settlement between major banks and homeowners in all 50 states - Beck has finally fabricated a reason to talk about mortgage foreclosures, all while accusing the labor movement and the Obama administration of economic terrorism.
Beck bases his latest conspiracy theory on statements purportedly made by Stephen Lerner, whom Beck describes as "a former top official" at the Service Employees International Union. In audio posted at Glenn Beck's "The Blaze" website, a man identified as Lerner discusses civil disobedience that can be directed at banks, citing as an example homeowners who owe more money on their mortgage than their homes are worth:
For example, 10 percent of homeowners going back to where you started a quarter of the people who own a home are underwater, right? Their home, they are paying more than its worth. Ten percent of those people now are strategic default, meaning, they are refusing to pay but they are staying in their home. That's totally spontaneous, right? They figured out it takes a year to kick me out of my home because foreclosure is backed up, I'm going to stay I won't pay. It's a good business decision. If you could double that number, you would make banks -- put banks at the edge of insolvency again.
Based on the comments of this one man, Beck has fabricated a conspiracy theory positing that labor unions are, with President Obama's full knowledge and acquiescence, collaborating to engage in economic terrorism in order to overthrow the U.S. government. Yesterday, Beck devoted the better part of his three-hour radio show and the entirety of his Fox News show to warnings about this utterly made-up conspiracy.
But contrast this obsession with Beck's practical silence regarding the actual foreclosure crisis that prompted a national investigation into whether major lenders had illegally foreclosed on what was estimated to be millions of homeowners.
In late September 2010, JPMorgan Chase announced that it was suspending foreclosure actions against defaulting homeowners. GMAC also suspended foreclosures, and Bank of America - the nation's largest home lender - joined the freeze within days.
These actions came amid questions as to whether major lenders had met their legal obligations. In depositions, bank employees acknowledged signing 10,000 foreclosure affidavits each month - a process that came to be known as robo-signing -- raising concerns that millions of homeowners could have lost their homes in error.
With dozens of states pursuing legal action against the banks, Democratic lawmakers called on the Justice Department to investigate the industry for possible fraud.
But Beck could scarcely be bothered to address the concerns of homeowners who had never missed a payment, or whose payments were lost in the shuffle as banks swapped and resold mortgages -- homeowners who now faced foreclosure notices from banks that were under investigation for fraudulent foreclosure practices.
The one time Beck brought up the actual crisis, he issued a generic call to "find out about it" in case "bad things are going on," and then immediately bashed Democrats for calling for an actual investigation:
If there is corruption in the bank, it needs to be found and it needs to be found quickly. As this drags on, and it will, it brings the mortgage industry to a grinding halt.
If banks can't foreclosure, well then they can't loan either. Why would you loan if you can't be guaranteed you're going to get something back? And if banks won't loan, well then, how do you buy a house? How do you sell your house?
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi and 30 other geniuses in Congress are moving to investigate foreclosure practices of the U.S. mortgage lenders. Gee, I wonder if the mortgage companies will be painted as the evil corporations who are kicking people out in the street while the evil, greedy CEO gets a bonus.
Look for a punishment followed by a necessary takeover of another industry that's too-big-to-fail. Actually, it won't be a takeover, not in a socialistic sense, it will just be in a little bit of control. [Fox News, Glenn Beck, 10/7/10, via Nexis]
That's the only reference to the crisis from Beck's show that can be found in Nexis. In late October, Beck said, "Mortgages are underwater. Foreclosures, banks are going under," only to then complain, "We're now going to punish the rich with taxes [10/22/10, via Nexis]."
These comments are indicative of Beck's reflexive hostility to any attempt at holding banks accountable. During the May 27, 2010, edition of his Fox show, he criticized a provision in financial regulatory reform that targeted abusive lending, connecting it to the "fundamental transformation" being pursued by "radical progressives and the revolutionaries." After asking, "what is abusive lending." Beck opined:
You see, it puts the pressure on the lender, and not -- you know, and not the -- not to just offer full disclosure but to take full responsibility of not only themselves but the person sitting in the other chair. Don't worry if you can't pay your loan. Blame the abusive, greedy bank.
Who's going to loan money in that atmosphere?
So when dozens of attorneys general launch an investigation into possible mortgage fraud affecting millions of people, Beck can't really be bothered. And when Democratic lawmakers try to curb abusive lending practices, Beck attacks their efforts as a plot hatched by "radical progressives."
But when one person says that more homeowners should stop paying their mortgages in order to destabilize the banking system, Beck ratchets up the apocalyptic fervor, launching a massive on-air campaign to vilify organized labor and the Obama administration.
















And, once again, Beck has ascribed unbelievable power to someone whose name no one has previously heard.
Its a shame you cant trust your own eyes/ears anymore.
Lerner didn't say anything very controversial (unless you take it out of context and drop key words). I interpreted the "first week of May" reference to be a series of planned public protests (i.e. picket signs, chanting to disrupt banking conferences).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvlvejSxBVQ&feature=player_embedded
Here are some of Lerner's key comments on the Left's plans for America:
"We need to figure out in a much more through direct action, much more concrete way, how we really trying to disrupt and create uncertainty for capital, for how corporations operate" ...
"There are actually extraordinary things we could do right now that would start to destabilize the folks that are in power and start to rebuild a movement" ...
"We have an entire economy that is built on debt and banks so the question would be what would happen if we organized homeowners in mass to do a mortgage strike if we get half a million people to agree it would literally cause a new finical crisis for the banks not for us we would be doing quite well we wouldn't be paying anything." ...
"if we really believe that we are in a transformative stage of what's happening in capitalism, then we need to confront this in a serious way and develop really ability to put a boot in the wheel, then we have to think not about labor and community alliances we have to think about how together we are building something that really has the capacity to disrupt how the system operates" ...
"We have to think much more creatively. The key thing... What does the other side fear the most - they fear disruption. They fear uncertainty. Every article about Europe says in they rioted in Greece the markets went down" ...
"what we are looking at is the first week in May can we get enough people together starting now to really have an week of action in New York I don't want to give any details because I don't know if there are any police agents in the room, but the goal would be that we will roll out of New York the first week of May. We will connect three ideas:
- that we are not broke there is plenty of money
- they have the money - we need to get it back ...
- and so we need to take on those folks at the same time and that we will start here we are going to look at a week of civil disobedience - direct action all over the city"
Stephen Lerner then concludes:
"There is going to be a ten state mobilization it try and shut down that meeting and then looking at bank shareholder meetings around the country and try and create some moments like Madison except where we are on offense instead of defense
Where we have brave and heroic battles challenging the power of the giant corporations. We hope to inspire a much bigger movement about redistributing wealth and power in the country and that labor can't do itself that community groups can't do themselves but maybe we can work something new and different that can be brave enough and daring and nimble enough to do that kind of thing."