About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Fox Goes Birther

March 28, 2011 10:50 am ET by Melody Johnson

Today on Fox & Friends, eccentric billionaire Donald Trump appeared to recite his intensely disturbing birther theories, as the Fox & Friends co-hosts on the curvy couch sat idly by. It wasn't exactly the first time the blatant birther crowd has been chosen to speak up about their theories on Fox News; indeed, over the past week, Fox News has relentlessly hyped Trump's recent embrace of birther conspiracy theories, with Sean Hannity going so far as to spend a week defending birthers and apparently attempting to legitimize the movement.

From the show:

DONALD TRUMP: They asked John McCain for his birth certificate. They've asked others for their birth certificate. They asked Bush for his birth certificate, by the way. I just found out over the weekend. And they would ask me for my birth certificate and by the way, it's sitting on the top of my desk. They give you a certificate of live birth, which anybody can get, just walk into the hospital, and you get a certificate of live birth. It's not even signed by people. Now, this guy either has a birth certificate or he doesn't. And I didn't think this was such a big deal, but I will tell you, it's turning out to be a very big deal because people now are calling me from all over saying, please don't give up on this issue. If you weren't born in this country, you cannot be president. 

CARLSON: Do you think he was born in this country? 

TRUMP: I am really concerned. And I will tell you, when this all started a week ago, I assumed, hey, look, you have no doctors that remember. You have no nurses - this is the President of the United States - that remember. That ad that was placed in the Houston paper, that was placed in the paper days after he was born. So he could have come into the country, and they did it for social reasons they put it in! They did it for whatever reason. There are a lot of reasons you could have put an ad in. But he could have been born outside of this country. Why can't he produce a birth certificate and by the way, there is one story that his family doesn't even know what hospital he was born in! 

DOOCY: Yeah, I've heard that as well. Donald, before you go, what about the mainstream media counts of this dust up over the last week, where they're trying to paint you as you know the mayor of crazy town for bringing this up? 

TRUMP: Well you know, it's amazing. I start off every time I talk about the birthers, I start off by saying, and it's very interesting, I was a great student at the best college in the country. You know? I want to let people know. I'm a smart guy. Because what they do to the birthers, and I don't even like the term, the birthers. I think it's unfair to them. These are people that want to see a birth certificate. They want to know that the president was born here! 

CARLSON: But--But, why would you go down this path, Donald? A lot of people were asking that last week as well. Why would you decide to do this if, in fact, you decide to run for president? 

TRUMP: Because if you're not born in the United States, you cannot be president. And, there is a real question. And if this birth certificate exists, you know what I get a kick out of? The Governor of Hawaii says, "I remember when he was born 50 years ago." I doubt it. I think this guy should be investigated. I doubt it. He remembers when Obama was born? Give me a break! He's just trying to do something for his party. The fact is, if you're not born in the United States, you cannot be president. He is having a hard time -- he spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue, millions of dollars in legal fees trying to get away from this issue. And I'll tell you what, I brought it up just routinely and all of a sudden, a lot of facts are emerging, and I'm starting to wonder myself whether or not he was born in this country. 

KILMEADE: So it's not going away in your mind. Donald Trump, who we all know was born in this country, all you have to do is read the side of his building.

DOOCY: Which one?

KILMEADE: I know! Many of--Donald, "celebrity apprentice" going well. Thank you for joining us. We look forward to this every Monday. 

As seen in the transcript, Trump makes claims more outlandish than ever before, and none of the Fox & Friends co-hosts bother to correct or challenge him. They merely sit quietly as Trump goes on and on about how "unfair" the term birther is. "These are people that want to see a birth certificate," Trump exclaimed. "They want to know that the president was born here!"

Not surprisingly, Trump's claims are easily debunked. First, his suggestion that Obama hasn't produced a birth certificate or certificate of live birth, as he said, is patently false. Obama's campaign made public a copy of Obama's certificate of live birth, which was published on the Internet by numerous media outlets. Many experts, including a team from FactCheck.org, reviewed the document in person and determined it was authentic. On July 27, 2009, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, certified that she had personally seen Obama's birth certificate in the original records maintained by the Hawaii government. In fact, it was this "certificate of live birth" that had the birthers all in a tizzy; they've been demanding for years that Obama release his "long-form" birth certificate, since they deem the certificate of live birth to be insufficient proof. So, Trump can't even get his birther talking points straight.

Further proof of this can be seen in his absurd suggestion that the Obamas planted a birth announcement in a "Houston paper...days after he was born," conveniently giving Obama's parents plenty of time to sneak him back into the country. In fact, the Obamas placed their birth announcement in a Honolulu newspaper, not a Houston paper, and, seriously? Why would it be strange that the announcement appeared "days after he was born?" Does Trump have no idea how newspapers work? Did he expect the president's mother to write a birth announcement in advance of actually giving birth, accurately predicting the day she would have her first child, then demanding that the paper publish the announcement on that very day? Take a look at the other birth announcements published on that day's paper--all of the newly announced births took place on dates ranging from July 30 to August 6. Did all of those people, too, have their child out of the country, only to stealthily smuggle their babies back into the U.S. to then publish birth announcements in the local paper, "for social reasons?"

Trump's rant also included the idea that the president "spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue, millions of dollars in legal fees trying to get away from this issue." Although it has been reported that the president has spent nearly $1.7 million in legal fees since 2007, nowhere does it say that the fees have been allotted to citizenship or birth certificate related matters. Like most of Fox News, Trump has his facts wrong.

Previously, Fox hyped Trump's birtherism, and prime-time host Sean Hannity has relentlessly promoted birther conspiracies over the past week, falsely stating that it's "not true" that Obama has shown his birth certificate in addition to holding a week-long campaign promoting the idea that the president is not a legal citizen of the United States.

The question remains - how long will this parade of Fox birther conspiracy march on? Brian Kilmeade seems to have put it best: "We look forward to this every Monday."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 10:57 am ET)
      16  
      Of Course. It's probably going to be the cornerstone of the FOX/GOP 2012 campaign.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (March 28, 2011 11:07 am ET)
        15 2
        An authentic birth certificate was produced, you are just too blinded by your racism to see this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by boulderhippy (March 28, 2011 11:13 am ET)
          1 28
          Questioning a requirement in the constitution is racist? Oh, I forgot that is all you see is racism.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ScienceBuff (March 28, 2011 11:14 am ET)
            23 1
            All Constitutional requirements for the Presidency have been met.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by progressivevoicedaily (March 28, 2011 11:29 am ET)
              13  
              Leftistloon and ColoradoSpringsFascist. 2 trolls getting paid by right wing think tanks. If not, then they're not very good at playing the 'free market'.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by boulderhippy (March 28, 2011 11:33 am ET)
                  19
                Attack people you disagree with because there isn't a logical argument in your brain.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 11:37 am ET)
                  18  
                  Questioning a requirement that has been proven to have been met makes you a racist.

                  Why do you enjoy being a racist so much?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 11:41 am ET)
                  13  
                  I gave you a logical argument. You haven't responded. You've proudly proclaimed your racism and bigotry here, BH. It's not an attack if one is simply stating truth.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 11:46 am ET)
                  9  
                  I disagree with the birthers because they have yet to make a logical argument.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by progressivevoicedaily (March 28, 2011 12:06 pm ET)
                    9  
                    I'll challenge ColoradoSpringsFascist all day long. To this date, I have yet to see anything posted from you with any resemblance of a process called critical thought. Sorry that I'm better than you at YOUR game. Liberal's RULE!!
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by wesley_fpt (March 28, 2011 12:30 pm ET)
                  6  
                  There is no argument. Obama was born in Hawaii. That's a fact and is not up for debate.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by PurpleState (March 28, 2011 4:09 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Is this why Obama gets attacked so much by right-wing radio and journalism?

                  I'd been waiting for this argument to spring up. Thank you for explaining it all. Beck, Limbaugh, Fox News, and Breitbart are all attacking the people which with they disagree because there isn't a logical argument in their brains.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 11:17 am ET)
            15  
            Questioning a requirement which has already been met and which has not, in my memory, EVER been questioned of any Caucasian president or candidate would probably qualify as being suspicious of racism, BH. (My first vote for President was for Richard Nixon in 1972). But, since you've admitted here that you are a proud racist, you wouldn't see that, huh?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by dkylep (March 28, 2011 11:22 am ET)
              14  
              Exactly Bintx. One admitted racist in boulderhippy defending another racist's comments. What's fascinating is that they KNOW that what they believe is bad. Or they wouldn't bother trying so hard to defend it and tell people that they aren't.

              I'm sure you're late for your latest cross-burning boulderhippy. You'll likely be joining leftistloon there.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by boulderhippy (March 28, 2011 11:44 am ET)
                  17
                I guess questioning anything Obama does or says is going to get people that have no defense to call others racist. To question my motivations doesn't eliminate the original question and actually makes you look like a coward for refusing to debate civilly.
                I'm sure you're late for your latest cross-burning boulderhippy
                Yeah about 60 years. You can't possibly believe large groups of grown men still do this crap. You nee to come to the present and debate the problems we have today instead of junk that happened before our president was born (wherever that was).
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 11:57 am ET)
                  14  
                  I debated civilly, BH. You posted a ludicrous and FALSE statement. You have, in the past, proudly proclaimed your racism and bigotry.

                  Are you REALLY stupid enough to believe that Mr. Obama's history has not been extensively investigated by federal authorities?

                  Personally, based upon your comments here, I'm guessing it's just your raging racism and bigotry.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 12:17 pm ET)
                  8  
                  (wherever that was).

                  Racist birther is racist.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by SacredSalad (March 28, 2011 11:41 am ET)
              1 8
              Chester A. Arthur
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 11:56 am ET)
                9  
                Did you notice I said "in my memory"? I know about the question of Arthur's birth, but that was WAAAAAAAY before my time. Barry Goldwater's qualifications under the "natural born" citizenship requirement were also questioned because he was born in the Arizona Territories and McCain's were questioned in 2000 when he was running against Bush. He was NOT questioned in 2008 because Congress passed a bill which was sponsored by Obama and Hillary Clinton stating that it would NOT be a question and declaring him to be a "natural born citizen." The point is that Obama's proof of natural born citizenship has been presented, together with ephemeral proof (the two separate newspaper announcements). Obama has been in political office for some time. His background has been extensively checked by law enforcement and other national security authorities, just like any other President . . . this is a very, very stupid debate.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by SMTDL (March 28, 2011 1:44 pm ET)
            8  
            Its not the questioning,its the refusal to accept the facts that answered the question.To relentlessly claim that proof was not given is delusional or maybe racist.Take your pick!
            Answer your own question... if credible state officials and non partisan fact checkers all agree on the validity of the birth certtificate,why is it not acceptable by some that cling to what they want to believe.Are they just stubborn,partisan,ignorant,bigoted,racist or what?
            I have never seen McCain's ,Palin's,Trump's,Bush's,Bachman's or Hannity's.The one I have seen is Obama's.I Think they all are natural born American citizens.Why can't those that have seen the Birth Certificate and heard from Hawaiian officials let it go? If they can't ,one reason may very well be racism.Why is it the only one in demand .Have they seen everyone else's? Have they even asked to see any of the others?Some demanded to see Bush's military records,he never showed them-A little controversy that was short-lived.Dan Rather was fired for a font irregularity in the documents he was given to show the special treatment Bush was given in Texas,but none of the facts were challenged.No one cared very much about that mystery -should that Pres have been given a dishonorable discharge for going AWOL as others would?!!
            Is there a double standard going on with Pres Obama?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (March 28, 2011 11:14 am ET)
          8  
          It might not be racism on his/her part. It could just be plain, simple idiocy. But, then with all the condescending chat about Kenya, a place the President has never lived, maybe racism is the issue. I seem to remember that the State Department got in trouble (under Condie Rice) for having personnel who illegally accessed the travel/passport information of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Don't you think, if there had been anything to the non-American rumors, it would have come out then?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 11:43 am ET)
          1 14
          Aside from the fact it's probably just out of pure intellectual laziness that you make the claim, what proof do you have that Trump is a racist for saying asking the question?


          And as to intellectual laziness, Melody Johnson makes no case that Fox has gone birther other than the fact they let Trump speak on it's show and airs his opinions, something for which The View just did the same thing.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:27 pm ET)
              9
            Can anyone here with the least bit of honesty about them explain to me how Melody Johnson backed up her claim that "Fox News [Went} Birther".

            Are you a 'birther' if you have someone on your show like a Donald Trump and you let him ask questions with going all Whoopi Goldberg on him? Does that define birtherism to liberals.

            Does that make Fox News racist for not giving the same researched facts in reply to him that Melody Johnson just did to supposedly debunk Trump?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 12:35 pm ET)
              10  
              You might have an arguement, if this was the first instance of fox going birther, but it is not.

              They have supported this story, instead of shooting it down for the lie it is. That makes them birthers.

              As for Trump, he is a publicity hound. I doubt if he cares if Pres Obama was born in the U.S.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:44 pm ET)
                  9
                Melody Johnson title her entry "Fox Goes Birther".

                How did Fox 'go birther' here, jarossiter?

                Explain to me what she didn't bother to do if you would, please.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 12:48 pm ET)
                  7  
                  Silence is assent, hoosier.

                  By not denouncing the lie, they imply it is truth.

                  That makes them birthers.

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 12:55 pm ET)
                  7  
                  By treating it as a legitimate news story.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 1:03 pm ET)
                      10
                    Is Chris Matthews a birther?

                    Barbara Walters?

                    Left-wing bloggers and news media love to flog this story for all it's worth because they think it's a winner and it generates traffic. Does that make them birthers, too. They treat it as a legitimate news story.

                    You're not making yourself very clear in your accusations, nerzog. Maybe you should go work for MMFA, too. Or do you already?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 1:09 pm ET)
                      7  
                      They treat it as a legitimate news story.

                      No they don't, They treat it like the lunacy it is.

                      They may hightlight the story, but how else do you show it for the stupidity it is, without talking about it.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 1:15 pm ET)
                      5  
                      No, they treat the Troglodyte politicians who are too cowardly to denounce it as a legitimate news story. Do you see the difference, or do we need a chalkboard?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 1:21 pm ET)
                          7
                        I'd like you to put it up on a chalkboard how Melody Johnson proved her claim that Fox News went birther, nerzog.

                        MMFA is paying her to write this, and you show up here faithfully every. single. day. to provide cover for the kids they hire to write opinion articles with definitive statements in their headers.

                        Explain to me how what she wrote is true based on what she wrote.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 1:31 pm ET)
                          3  
                          How about you tell us which of her claims is not true?

                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 1:46 pm ET)
                          7  
                          I'd like you to put it up on a chalkboard how Melody Johnson proved her claim

                          1. Scroll to the top of this page.

                          2. Read.

                          3. Comprehend what you're reading.

                          4. Get back to us.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 1:52 pm ET)
                          5  
                          News; indeed, over the past week, Fox News has relentlessly hyped Trump's recent embrace of birther conspiracy theories, with Sean Hannity going so far as to spend a week defending birthers and apparently attempting to legitimize the movement.


                          Now, you can challenge these facts if you wish, but it does relate to the headline, which is what you were asking for, right?

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 2:11 pm ET)
                              8
                            I would say that the case she makes is less than persuasive.

                            I just googled the author's name because I was so stunned not only by the lack of professionalism in this article, but the mere fact that MMFA hires kids to write this stuff. This statement is on her LinkedIn page:

                            Possessed of boundless creativity in writing, thinking and persuading.

                            I'd say that was a fairly bold claim after reading this article, wouldn't you. I suppose you could make the case that her there does exist a heavy dose of creativity in her thinking and writing, but I'm not so sure about her effectiveness in the persuasion department.

                            Is this what MMFA is going after these days, creativity in writing, thinking and persuasion?

                            And you guys just sit idly by and nod your heads?

                            Yoi.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 2:27 pm ET)
                              5  
                              You do know that this section is a blog, don't you? If you want researched articles, you'll click on the tab called "Research". And if you want TV/radio clips, you click on the tab called "MMTV".

                              It's really quite simple once you get the hang of it. I've got faith in you.
                              Report Abuse
                            • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 3:39 pm ET)
                              2  
                              "I would say that the case she makes is less than persuasive."

                              A closed mind will do that.

                              But you just keep moving those goal posts. You've gone from calling facts opinion to critising what the writer says about herself.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 4:54 pm ET)
                                  2
                                'A closed mind', jarossiter? No one will tell me save your weak answer how in any way Melody Johnson provided any kind of proof for her assertion that 'Fox Goes Birther', and no one here apparently agrees with you that silence means agreement.

                                Saying silence means agreement like you did is the epitome of closed-mindedness. It's bigotry, too, because not saying anything means you can assign whatever your biased opinion of someone was to their silence, which is wrong.

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by jarossiter (March 29, 2011 8:32 am ET)
                                     
                                  No, if someone says to me, "I don't think President Obama was born in the US" and I say nothing, everyone can assume that I agree with the statement. If I didn't agree, I should say so.

                                  If fox brings birthers on,or does multiple shows about how birthers have not been disproven, without laying out the facts, then Fox has gone birther.

                                  It is quite simple.
                                  Report Abuse
                • Author by buckyg (March 28, 2011 1:32 pm ET)
                  6  
                  probably by having the host ask the guest whether or not he thought obama was born in the United states. a real news organization doesnt ask people what conspiracies they believe, and then not correct them when they say they believe in things proven to be false
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by raine315 (March 28, 2011 11:16 am ET)
        12 1
        There are MILLIONS of Americans issued driver licenses, passports and accepted into our military with the very type of short form birth certificate like President Obama's! So if its good enough to join our armed forces its good enough for job of POTUS
        Report Abuse
        • Author by progressivevoicedaily (March 28, 2011 11:32 am ET)
          10 1
          In fact, some states ONLY issue this type of format as a replacement. But don't let that get in the way of anything! Fight on tbaggers!, you're just cementing your minority status in this country!! Can't wait to see all of you nutjobbers reactions when you get your arse kicked in November.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Boswell (March 28, 2011 10:10 pm ET)
            1 1
            gotta love the trollies, thumbs down for facts! we gotta love them I guess since nobody else does...
            Report Abuse
      • Author by dkylep (March 28, 2011 11:20 am ET)
        11  
        You're a racist, plain and simple. Those black folks shouldn't get all uppity and try to run for political office when only the white people deserve to hold such positions, at least according to you and your philosophies, right leftist? Hey, burn any good crosses lately on the lawns of any of those uppity colored people that got out of place and dared move into the suburbs or anything?

        I'm sure that you have to make sure your bedsheet is washed for the next meeting with all your like-minded friends, so I won't take up any more of your time making you read this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 11:52 am ET)
          1 18
          "Accusations of racism are the last refuge of the liberal scoundrel."

          --Charles Krauthammer


          Truer words were never spoken.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mjlilgui (March 28, 2011 11:59 am ET)
            13  
            Because racism never happens. Why is Obama's birth questioned when no other modern president was and when he was vetted by all responsible parties before the election? Do you think questioning his birth certificate is valid? If so, why? If not, why do you think people are questioning it?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:15 pm ET)
              1 14
              My point is that it's laziness to blame it on racism, mjlilgui.

              It's an easy accusation to make for a liberal regarding any criticism of Obama.

              The accusation was made, so I'd like to hear you or anyone make a case that Trump is a racist, and is only motivated by race is asking these questions he's asking.

              Either make the case or admit it's just a hunch that came to mind with no effort on your part for why you feel it's true.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 12:20 pm ET)
                9  
                I wouldn't say Trump is a racist. He's a corporatist looking to make an easy buck off the racist birthers. In other words, he knows the audience he's trying to fleece, and they're racists, so he went with the birther crap.

                And it's not just ANY criticism of Obama that makes you a racist. That's moving the goal posts, just like the nutjobs seem to always have to do to make an argument.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:41 pm ET)
                  1 11
                  So, you think Trump is a birther, you think birthers are racists, but you don't think Trump is a racist, is that it, foghorn?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 12:50 pm ET)
                    6  
                    Hey the right wing likes to apply guilt by association, so if they don't like it, they should stop doing it.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 1:00 pm ET)
                    7  
                    Trump may or may not be a birther. My opinion is he's going with this birther crap not because he believes it, but because he knows it's easy to make a buck from the hateful, racist birthers.

                    That's what it is, hoosier. Any questions?
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by mjlilgui (March 28, 2011 12:52 pm ET)
                3  
                It might be laziness or it might be perceived that some people who are historically racist are also accusing Obama of not being one of "us." I never said Trump was racist, but I will say that some people who question Obama's birthright are. I'm sure even you can agree that that's possible, even if it's an exception to the rule.

                Again, I ask, do you or don't you think questioning Obama's birth certificate is valid, and what reasons would one have for doing so? I myself cannot see any validity to this line of thinking.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:59 pm ET)
                  1 8
                  Honestly, I can't see any validity to Obama not posting his birth certificate on the internet for all the world to see and putting an end to all this. That's all Trump is trying to get him to do. I think most of the true birthers are silly for the most part, but likewise I think irresponsibly-written hack articles like this one are silly, too, and liberals look defensive and childish calling people racists and loons for wondering why Obama doesn't just post it for everyone to see.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 1:02 pm ET)
                    3 1
                    Oh but he has.

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 1:03 pm ET)
                    8 1
                    I can't see any validity to Obama not posting his birth certificate on the internet for all the world to see

                    He has posted it. That's where your racist birtherhood is exposed. I guess we could call people like you who really think he was born in the US but just want to see something that has already been shown a "soft birther".

                    For the last time:

                    OBAMA.
                    HAS.
                    POSTED.
                    HIS.
                    BIRTH.
                    CERTIFICATE.
                    ON.
                    THE.
                    INTERNET.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 1:24 pm ET)
                      3  
                      But Blimpy told me that it was Photoshopped! The Teabaggers wouldn't be satisfied if they could all line up in Hawaii and touch the birth certificate with their own hands.

                      It's very similar to the "Hillary-murdered-Vince-Foster" bullsh*t. No matter how many investigators concluded that Foster committed suicide, a certain number of Trogldytes refuse to accept it. Quite often the myth is more exciting than reality.

                      Of course, the same people reject out of hand that Darth Cheney may have jazzed up the Iraq WMD intelligence reports. No, that could never happen!
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by jonimacaroni1 (March 28, 2011 2:52 pm ET)
                      4  
                      He has not posted his "birth certificate" on the Internet. What's been posted is his Certificate of Live Birth, the replacement that he got as a teenager in order to get a passport. We've never seen his "birth certificate".

                      Of course, we don't need to. The COLB shows us that he was born in the USA. It proves his citizenship.

                      It's this distinction without a difference that Fox News is running with now.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by RKAllen (March 29, 2011 1:24 pm ET)
                           
                        He has not posted his "birth certificate" on the Internet. What's been posted is his Certificate of Live Birth, the replacement that he got as a teenager in order to get a passport. We've never seen his "birth certificate".
                        Incorrect. The document that has been posted was created on June 6, 2007 and not during the time when he was a "teenager in order to get a passport." That is incorrect and a fabrication. The date the document was created is on the back of the certificate and it is clearly marked along with a seal.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by susan.gillesp9641 (March 28, 2011 1:31 pm ET)
                    4 1
                    He DID do that - long, long ago!! What I can't get over in these political times is that the Big Lie just keeps on getting repeated, and people prefer to believe it. By all standards of rational discussion, this should have been a non-issue years ago. It has been posted online. It was viewed in-person by reporters who vouched for the seal. And, the person in charge of vital records in Hawaii vouched for it. Why isn't that enough? Why do people demand that Pres. Obama produce what they themselves could not produce if it were demanded of them? Why is there a conspiracy implied that he "won't"? Because somebody's making hay out of it, that's why: why do you participate in the ongoing perpetration of this story?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 1:48 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Why isn't that enough?

                      Because racist birthers like hoosiers and BH can't tolerate the black man in the White House.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by SMTDL (March 29, 2011 1:23 pm ET)
                   
                It is fueled by racism,race baiting,playing racial politics and of course partisaship.How can a journalist not challenge birthers on the air when the state of Hawaii has gone on record as having the original certificate.Why is that not official?All states certify birth records for ID's,passports,driver's license,etc.
                Why are these state authorities attacked in such an ethical way by people that have no basis to discount their information.If the state of New York gives the same endorsement of Trump's birth are they to be disbelieved and attacked like Hawaii has been attacked and mocked.If NY records are not treated with the same derisive attitude,what is the reason?Obama vs.Trump..what's different?
                Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 11:59 am ET)
            7  
            Nope. BH has proudly proclaimed his racism and bigotry here, hoosier. The claim wasn't being made willy-nilly.

            BTW, I'd find a better source of quotes than that PNAC neo-conservative Krauthammer. You are aware that neo-conservatism is NOT conservatism, right?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 12:02 pm ET)
            5  
            The belief that we live in a post-racial America is the last refuge of the conservative scoundrel.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 12:02 pm ET)
            5  
            The belief that we live in a post-racial America is the last refuge of the conservative scoundrel.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:10 pm ET)
                12
              Not worth saying once, much less twice, pete.

              Weak.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 12:17 pm ET)
                7  
                So is Krauthammer's comment.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 12:24 pm ET)
                4  
                No weaker or less true than Krauthammer's.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:38 pm ET)
                    8
                  Fine, here's a chance to prove your opinion has merit, pete.

                  Make the case that Trump is a racist for asking these questions.

                  Explain how anyone who is wondering why Obama doesn't supply his birth certificate and thinks he has something to hide is a racist for being curious about it.

                  While you're at it, please do what Melody Johnson failed to do and back the claim she made in the title to this dreck of a blog entry for which Media Matters sees fit to pay her for and, curiously enough, has the means and the motives to do so.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 12:43 pm ET)
                    6  
                    I never said Trump was a racist. Take that up with someone who did.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 12:49 pm ET)
                        7
                      So someone else does accuse him of being a racist and I reply that person is making the accusation without merit, that this is something that liberals are prone to do, and you take issue with that statement, but you demur as to why you take issue with the generalization. Amazing.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 1:14 pm ET)
                        6  
                        I was responding to nothing but your Krauthammer quote, and it's implied accusation (according to you) that liberals are prone to accusations of racism. I take issue with that generalization because I am one liberal who does not throw around accusations of racism casually.

                        Yeah, I agree that it sucks being called a racist, probably a lot more than it sucks to be called a "liberal soundrel," but until I see you actually post something overtly racist, you won't get that accusation from me. The other posters here should defend their own accusations because I'm not going to do it for them, and you're mistaken if you think I am.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 1:28 pm ET)
                            6
                          jossiter above claimed that silence is assent.

                          I'm going to assume from your reply here that you don't believe that.

                          But that's exactly the case Melody Johnson made, that Fox's silence to Trump's questions implied assent, therefore they were birthers, too.

                          Yet no one here questions her assertions.

                          Why is that, other than intellectual dishonesty?

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 1:33 pm ET)
                            4  
                            "Yet no one here questions her assertions.

                            Why is that, other than intellectual dishonesty?"

                            Hold on. We agree that fox news is birther central, so why would we argue otherwise?
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 1:43 pm ET)
                            3  
                            We were talking about accusations of racism a moment ago. Now it seems to be of dire importance that you know my opinion on everything written by everyone.

                            I'm not here to defend or explain everything posted here, be it by MMfA or in the comment forum.

                            But I'm guessing my silence is tantamount to assent?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 1:54 pm ET)
                                7
                              "But I'm guessing my silence is tantamount to assent? "

                              That's the case Melody Johnson is making against Fox, no?

                              Is this what MMFA's new mission statement about focusing on sabotaging Fox News is all about, silence is assent, therefore one's silence is de facto proof of birtherism and racism?

                              Is that not what's going on here?

                              Paying newbie college kids with razor-thin resumes and no hope of meaningful full-time employment to write such bs assertions, and you guys who post here every day show up and act like there's nothing wrong with it?

                              What the Fukushima, pete?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 2:29 pm ET)
                                5  
                                But I'm guessing my silence is tantamount to assent? "

                                That's the case Melody Johnson is making against Fox, no?


                                There ya have it folks, the false equivalence of a major media network being compared to a poster on a blog.
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by pete592 (March 28, 2011 2:38 pm ET)
                                4  
                                So now you need to know what I think of MMfA's hiring practices? Does this list ever end?

                                Since I don't have any information regarding MMfA's hiring and employment practices, I'm not really sure how I should act. Maybe I should recuse myself from participating until I've seen all the dirt you've got on them.

                                With regard to "no hope of meaningful full-time employment," I'm at a loss as to what makes that different from a typical internship, which "newbie college kids" enter into all the time with the understanding that there is no guarantee of a permanent position.

                                Report Abuse
              • Author by bilbo_dies (March 28, 2011 1:49 pm ET)
                3  
                The belief that we live in a post-racial America is the last refuge of the conservative scoundrel.
                pete592
                Not worth saying once, much less twice, pete.

                If you believe that we live in a post racial America you are either: delusional, an idiot, or a lier.

                Which is it?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by kabniel (March 28, 2011 2:48 pm ET)
                2  
                Worth saying two dozen times hoosier
                Report Abuse
          • Author by jarossiter (March 28, 2011 12:37 pm ET)
            4  
            "Accusations of racism are the last refuge of the liberal scoundrel."

            --Charles Krauthammer

            A real bastion of nonpartisanship and truth,if there ever was one.
            /snark
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Lord of Light (March 28, 2011 1:25 pm ET)
            2  
            "Accusations of racism are the last refuge of the liberal scoundrel."

            --Charles Krauthammer

            It's not racist to you because you believe blacks are inferior and only acceptable if they do the bidding of rich white men (see Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams). Otherwise, they gotta shut up -- especially if they expect equality or, heaven forbid, one of them seeks higher office. Then that person has gotta be illegitimate.

            Whine all you want, but if there's racism, I'm calling a spade a spade. If you can't take the truth, too bad.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by kabniel (March 28, 2011 2:46 pm ET)
            3  
            Actually hoosier it is a pathetically weak attempt to deflect legitimate exposure of clear racism. People like Krauthammer are most likely not racist but they want to give cover to their ideological bretheren they KNOW ARE.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by PurpleState (March 28, 2011 4:24 pm ET)
            1  
            It's too bad his colleague Glenn Beck didn't heed those words.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by SacredSalad (March 28, 2011 11:00 am ET)
      5 1
      The question remains - how long will this parade of Fox birther conspiracy march on? Brian Kilmeade seems to have put it best: "We look forward to this every Monday."

      At least till November 5th 2012.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Pinhead (March 28, 2011 11:04 am ET)
      6  
      Is this a headline from Jan 20, 2009?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foole (March 28, 2011 11:29 am ET)
        5  
        I was thinking the same thing. This strategy failed big time during the 2008 campaign. I for one would love to see the conservatives go all birther all the time.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiG (March 28, 2011 12:18 pm ET)
          3  
          It's when they trot out their old debunked fallacies for a rerun that we know they have nothing of substance to offer. Obama will be a two-term President.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jonimacaroni1 (March 28, 2011 11:08 am ET)
      15  
      Obama's parents didn't place the ad in the paper.

      The hospital sent birth notices to the paper. When you had a baby back then, unless you checked the "do not send info to the newspaper" box on forms that parents filled out, all births were reported in the newspaper after hospitals collected the data. Every week or two, there'd be a list in the paper of recent births at local hospitals.

      The idea that the parents could somehow get the ad into the newspaper is both a ludicrous conspiracy theory and it's impossible too!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bellerophon (March 28, 2011 11:20 am ET)
      7  
      We all know no proof will be good enough, the president will never be patriotic enough, nor anything he does will ever be right because the "Birthers" don't want to be convinced. It's their way of saying: "Obama ain't our president, he don't look like none of dem other white presidents. Plus his family don't look like any of dem others president families, dey ain't ours."

      We can continue to tolerate this blatant racism and refrain from calling it what it is or we can endure this for as long as President Obama is in office.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by beDecent (March 28, 2011 11:25 am ET)
        6 1
        In short: He will never be white enough.

        It just shows me how much harder it is and how much stronger you need to be if you're an ethnic minority in America.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bellerophon (March 28, 2011 11:30 am ET)
          5 1
          Exactly, this puts an inordinate amount of pressure on President Obama to be perfect even though all of his predecessors were far from it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 11:41 am ET)
            8  
            Off-topic, but this situation reminds me of what's going on in Murfreesboro regarding the mosque. CNN had a great show last night that exposed all the idiotic hicks in Tennessee who think that a handful of Muslims are going to enact Sharia law in their fair town.

            Wonder where they got that idea? And the nutjobs continually wonder why we're concerned about the lies from Fox/hate radio.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by beDecent (March 28, 2011 11:49 am ET)
              6  
              Did you hear what Cain said over the weekend? If elected president, he will not appoint any Muslims to his cabinet, because they all want Sharia Law, according to Cain (well, and most others on the right).

              I mean, never mind the fact that religious law is already constitutionally prohibited from becoming a part of America's law anywhere and in any case. Of course, such fear is to be expected by people who are forever trying to get Biblical law into our courts (sans the modern day extreme and controversial parts, of course).
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 28, 2011 2:51 pm ET)
                4  
                I read about Cain on Think Progress. While Cain was saying he'd never hire any Muslims in his administration if he were president, Newt Gingrich was saying that if he were president, he'd get Arab League soldiers to help in Libya. Newt led the charge against Park 51 last year before the midterms.

                So, what is the GOP message regarding Muslims? You have one fool bashing them and another embracing them. Things would be much easier if they both would follow the Constitution. Problem solved.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by as promised (March 28, 2011 6:51 pm ET)
              1  
              Yes, quite a concept eh? They've been living there for 30+ years, but NOW they're going to 'rise up'. Uh-huh.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by hoosier (March 28, 2011 11:57 am ET)
              14
            Stop making excuses for the guy. If you're a liberal, you have to be disappointed that he's broken close to every campaign promise he made to you guys.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjlilgui (March 28, 2011 12:00 pm ET)
              6  
              Has he?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 28, 2011 12:01 pm ET)
              8 1
              He hasn't. Some folks weren't paying attention. They believed that Obama was a progressive when he was not. Obama has never been a progressive. The folks who are disappointed in him voted for a candidate who didn't exist and expected more than he promised.

              Just an observation from someone who didn't support Obama.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 12:14 pm ET)
                7  
                Correct. I just hope he becomes more progressive after he wins re-election.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by JohnBag (March 28, 2011 2:41 pm ET)
                     
                  It will not matter if he wins or not, the Senate and House will easily be GOP favored leaving Barry powerless.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by ONPRCNTR (March 28, 2011 1:13 pm ET)
                5 1
                you are right. I supported him because he was more progressive than our other options. He is about as liberal as Nixon in reality. We were running away from anything republican so fast our vision was blurred!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 1:29 pm ET)
                  5  
                  Same here, and for good reason. Look at what's happening in the states where Republicans have taken over.

                  Obama may be flawed, but the Republicans are downright odious.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by kabniel (March 28, 2011 2:54 pm ET)
              2  
              hoosier

              Since I see you are seriously brainwashed let me tell you what THIS liberals thinks. Us liberals are not very groupthink people so I speak only for myself. I do NOT see he has broken nearly every campaign promise he made. I think he tried to keep his promises and fell short a couple of times. He is actually exactly what he said he would be. That is pretty centrist. He is doing pretty much what I heard him say he was going to do so I am not really disappointed. He never CLAIMED to be someone that would try to usher in a new era of progressivism. He kept saying he wanted to be bipartisan that he wanted to get past the old arguments. I was pretty sure that would be a very bad strategy. I wanted someone who went in willing to FIGHT from day one but my choices didnt include Dennis Kucinich. It was him or McCain/Palin. I am certainly NOT disappointed that we got Obama over THAT iceberg.

              You can keep regurgitating the nonsense you were told to think about Obama or wake up and try to deal with factual reality. The choice is yours
              Report Abuse
    • Author by SacredSalad (March 28, 2011 11:27 am ET)
        9
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Chester A. Arthur
      Most official references list Arthur as having been born in Fairfield in Franklin County, Vermont on October 5, 1829. However, some time in the 1870s Arthur changed it to 1830 to make himself seem a year younger.[2]:5[5] His father had initially migrated to Dunham, Lower Canada, where he and his wife at one point owned a farm about 15 miles (24 km) north of the U.S. border.[2]:4 There has long been speculation that the future president was actually born in Canada and that the family moved to Fairfield later. If Arthur had been born in Canada, some believe that he would not have been a natural-born citizen (interpreting the law to mean that to be a natural-born citizen one must be born on U.S. territory) and would thus have been constitutionally ineligible to serve as vice president or president. During the 1880 U.S. presidential election a New York attorney, Arthur P. Hinman, was hired to explore rumors of Arthur's foreign birth. Hinman alleged that Arthur was born in Ireland and did not come to the United States until he was fourteen years old. When that story failed to take root Hinman came forth with a new story that Arthur was born in Canada. This claim also fell on deaf ears.[2]:202–203 In any case, Arthur's father was not naturalized until some years after his birth, resulting in Arthur having dual citizenship

      It has happened before.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SacredSalad (March 28, 2011 11:32 am ET)
          9
        And He was a Republican.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jonimacaroni1 (March 28, 2011 12:02 pm ET)
        5  
        Yes, unfair rumors were started about Arthur by his political opponents.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (March 28, 2011 12:23 pm ET)
          5  
          Well, we have the long history of Canadians being persecuted for their accent and love of ice hockey.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (March 28, 2011 2:46 pm ET)
        5  
        Some mystery surrounds the early years of Chester A. Arthur. The most frequently asked question is “Where was he born?” The President Arthur State Historic Site is a 1953 recreation of the second house in which Arthur lived as an infant. The confusion stems from the fact that Arthur himself told people that his birthyear was 1830 (it was actually 1829). The building in which he was born was actually a primitive cabin hastily erected in the village of Fairfield. The Baptist Congregation later completed the parsonage where the family moved shortly after the birth of the future president. It was this parsonage which was reconstructed by the State of Vermont.
        PRESIDENT CHESTER A. ARTHUR STATE HISTORIC SITE...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (March 28, 2011 11:30 am ET)
      15  
      I love these two pieces from Trump:
      ... you have no doctors that remember. You have no nurses - this is the President of the United States - that remember.
      ...
      The Governor of Hawaii says, "I remember when he was born 50 years ago." I doubt it. I think this guy should be investigated. I doubt it. He remembers when Obama was born? Give me a break!
      So, Trump believes that it's ridiculous that the medical personnel at a Hawaii hospital don't remember one particular baby out of thousands born there every year from decades ago. However, he can't believe that Abercrombie, the Governor of Hawaii, couldn't remember the birth of a baby to people who were friends of his at the time.

      As Trump said, "Give me a break!"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (March 28, 2011 11:39 am ET)
        3  
        Also, the President is 50 this year. If the nurse or doctor was a fresh-faced newbie of 22 or 28, they'd be 72 or 78 if they were still alive. I was delivered in a busy Navy hospital. I doubt the doctor remembered me over anyone other baby he delivered during his Navy career. The President was more unusual than most children in Hawaii, given his parentage but would he stand out enough to be remembered 50 years later? Probably not.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (March 28, 2011 12:19 pm ET)
          3  
          I was born in a small town hospital almost 51 years ago. It wouldn't be surprising if I was the only baby born there that day. I'd be surprised if any of the hospital personnel remembered my birth, even twenty ago.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by epkklk851 (March 28, 2011 12:32 pm ET)
            3  
            I happen to have both the hospital certificate with both my footprints, and the certified copy from the county's records. When I went to get my passport just before deploying overseas, I had to contact the county, the hospital certificate wasn't good enough, even though that was the only record I had had for 35 years of my life. I had to get the state form with a seal. It's the fancy paper and the seal that make it legal, and if it's good enough to get a passport, it's good enough for me.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 28, 2011 11:39 am ET)
        4  
        Isn't this a variation on the Circular Argument? "You can't provide me with somebody who remembers... I don't believe anyone can remember that far back."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jonimacaroni1 (March 28, 2011 12:05 pm ET)
        5  
        The current Governor happened to be friends with Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. If he didn't remember his friends having a baby, there'd be something wrong with him. But a doctor not coming forward to say that they remember some anonymous baby being born 50 years ago? Unless they knew that he was going to be President one day, why would someone in the hospital specifically remember that baby?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (March 28, 2011 12:26 pm ET)
      4 1
      Let the Trump and the Trogs keep blowing that dogwhistle. Hate as policy is a suicidal electoral strategy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jason Beets (March 28, 2011 3:16 pm ET)
         
      This would make a great Daily Show skit. Although Fox promoting Birtherism it hardly new.

      Lies from Fox News and Talk Radio are commonplace. Sometimes, though, even respected mainstream outlets intentionally lie to their viewers. To see a debunking of a lie that appeared on the NYT, AP, WP, and ABC read my analysis of their coverage of the story of Raymond Davis.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (March 28, 2011 3:29 pm ET)
         
      I am looking forward to see if Mika calls Trump out on this on the Morning Joe show. She says she loves the Donald, so now let's see how much love she has.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by as promised (March 28, 2011 6:37 pm ET)
         
      Well, obviously the birth certificate is the missing link to ECONOMIC RECOVERY !
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DrConspiracy (March 28, 2011 6:41 pm ET)
         
      Hang on...

      FactCheck.org did not send any "experts" to look at Obama's birth certificate and they did not determine its "authenticity." They send over a couple of staffers who determined that it was a real physical document that had a raised seal and a rubber stamp on the back. Then they took pictures.

      Far more important for determining its authenticity is the Obama FAQ page on the Hawaii Department of Health web site, that says he was born in Hawaii.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.