Kevin Jennings To Critics: "You Completely Failed"
June 17, 2011 6:43 am ET by Jeremy Schulman

Kevin Jennings has a message for the people who tried to destroy him: "I'd like you to know that you completely failed."
I'd reached Jennings last week as he was cleaning out his office on his final day as the head of the Department of Education's Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools -- a position from which anti-gay activists and conservative media outlets had tried unsuccessfully to oust him.
Now that Jennings is leaving on his own terms -- next month he'll become president and CEO of the national nonprofit group Be the Change -- he wants to make sure his detractors understand that they didn't keep him from carrying out his job.
"Despite all of your lies, despite all of your attacks, we managed to galvanize a national campaign against bullying that culminated with the president himself convening a summit on it in the East Room of the White House, which he personally keynoted," he says. "So despite your best efforts to derail what I was brought here to do, we were able to bring an unprecedented level of attention and energy to fighting bullying in a way never before done in this country.
"So, in the end, anybody looking back over the last two years would have to conclude that it is a complete and total victory for us and a complete and total defeat for our opponents, because they tried to derail -- and they used defamation to try and derail the work I was brought here to do, and they completely failed to do so. They completely and totally failed. And I want them to know that."
Jennings isn't exaggerating when he refers to "defamation."
Throughout the fall of 2009, Jennings -- who had spent the previous 19 years running the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) -- was the target of what he calls a "completely stunning" campaign of character assassination. Years-old lies, many of which had been recycled from an obscure Massachusetts hate group, were suddenly blasted out to the country by Fox News, The Washington Times, Andrew Breitbart's blog empire, and the rest of the conservative media.
Jennings was falsely accused of "encouraging" and "covering up" statutory rape. He was falsely accused of being a "pedophile." He was falsely accused of having "personally pushed books that encouraged children to meet adults at gay bars for sex." Karl Rove falsely claimed Jennings had engaged in "high-profile, in-your-face advocacy of things like NAMBLA."
"I chose to ignore it [at first] because I thought it was a bunch of extreme right-wing stuff that nobody would ever pay attention to, and then the next thing I knew, it was on Fox News every night," says Jennings. He remembers being at a Department of Education meeting about preventing drug abuse when the story first hit Fox in September 2009. He says he entered "a state of shock, like, 'I can't believe this is happening to me.' "
"There were times when I questioned, 'Is this worth it?' " explains Jennings. "Because when you're seeing your entire character being systematically destroyed by a defamation campaign, you begin to ask yourself, 'Is this worth the price?' "
"There were times in the fall of 2009 when I really went home and curled up in a ball in my bed and didn't want to get out of bed the next day," he says. "But I got out of bed every day. I went to 33 states and three foreign countries doing this work in two years, and we succeeded in doing what we came here to do."
At one point, 53 House Republicans signed a letter to President Obama claiming that Jennings had "played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America's schools." They demanded that Jennings be fired.
But Jennings says he "never felt pressure" from his bosses to resign, and he credits the White House with standing by him. "I'm really proud to have had the chance to serve in this administration," he tells me. "I'm really proud of the White House for standing by me when a lot of people might have wanted to cut me loose. It might have been smarter politically for them to cut me loose, but they chose to stand by me because they valued the work I was trying to do here, and I'm incredibly grateful to the White House for that."
Jennings says that he'd made up his mind early on that no matter how bad the smears got, he wouldn't resign. In fact, he sees the attacks on him as analogous to the schoolyard bullying that it was his job to confront.
"I'd come here to do something very important, and that was to galvanize the national campaign against bullying. And I wasn't going to be derailed from that work by a bunch of bullies and liars, which is what I was dealing with. ... I thought it'd be ironic if I came here to fight bullying and I let the bullies win.
"So at the very beginning of this, my partner and I talked, and we said, 'No matter how bad it gets, I would not resign.' Under no circumstances would I ever give in. And I'm proud to say that the White House never even raised that as a possibility with me, so it was never a decision I was ever asked to make. But we decided -- I remember the day the first attacks came out, Jeff and I talked, and we said no matter what happens, we're not going to quit. We're not going to let these type of lies, these type of bullies continue to run the show. We were going to stand our ground."
It's clearly a deeply personal issue for Jennings. In his memoir, he writes about being tormented as a child by other students who would call him "faggot" and "queer." As an adult, he founded GLSEN, an organization that has helped establish gay-straight alliances in schools across the country.
Jennings tells me he accepted the Department of Education job after reading a news story about Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover, an 11-year-old boy from Massachusetts. Walker-Hoover, who didn't identify as gay, hung himself in April 2009 after enduring repeated anti-gay harassment at school.
"On my first day here, I'd had buttons made up with Carl's school picture on them, and I handed them out to all the staff and told them that that's why I had come. It was because I wanted to make sure there would never be another Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover," says Jennings.
Last year, Jennings was confronted with a highly publicized series of teen suicides that were linked to anti-gay bullying.
"I know the families of an enormous number of the young people who died," says Jennings, explaining that the families sought him out after their children died. "It was really personally draining because I do care very much about this on a personal level, and I knew how much these parents were counting on me and counting on the president to actually do something. ... They'd lost their children, they'd been through the greatest tragedy I think any human being can experience, which is the loss of their child, and they came to us, to this administration -- came to me and, by extension through me, to the president -- and said, 'Please do something.' So talk about feeling an enormous burden to do something and to do it right when you know that you're doing this on behalf of people who have lost their children. It was this enormous sense of responsibility, an enormous feeling of -- we had to succeed because there was so much at stake."
Jennings says the crisis "threw a spotlight" on the urgency of the issue, which he had been working on since he joined the administration in 2009. "People were much more willing to listen to us and to do what we were suggesting because what was at stake became so tragically clear."
In the end, Jennings views his work as a success. "We have forever changed the national dialogue around bullying," he says. "I think that we had our tipping point moment around bullying in the last two years, where bullying became something that the United States simply said, 'No more.' Now, that doesn't mean bullying has gone away -- it's still there -- but I think we have achieved a gigantic shift in national consciousness, that we have turned the tide. I see school officials at all levels, from state, local, and federal, have dedicated themselves to doing something about this. Unprecedented levels of activity from the government itself. I think that we have forever shifted the dialogue around bullying in this country.
"And so when I look back on my two years here, I will leave feeling completely vindicated and proud of what we were able to do, that indeed I did come here for the right reason, and we were able to do what we set out to do -- despite the lies and despite the defamation."

















Why does that not sound odd.
Your next one will be your first one.
Certainly more intelligent then the stock "ratings = integrity" and "Soros = boogeyman" argument we've heard spit out again and again on threads where it's completely off topic.
Pick your arguments more carefully alwaysright1, defending this makes you look foolish.
Your next egregious falsehood is that George Soros funds Media Matters. Now, you'll no doubt come back and claim, in a semantic word-fight, that you never meant to say that Soros is the primary force behind Media Matters funding. Of course, everybody reading your comment knows precisely that is what you meant. Needless to say, simply black and white print and tax receipts demonstrate your lies. Of course, again, you simply don't care. It doesn't matter to you that George Soros has contributed a minute portion of money to Media Matters. You're not at all interested in truth. If you were, it'd sink your whole premise and perhaps torpedo your whole 'liberal media' myth too. At the very least, when you were confronted with the opposite of what you are saying, in black and white, it would make you stop and think. And if there's one thing that you right-wing lunatics can't stand doing (even more than telling the truth or using logic and evidence) it's thinking critically about something. Not sure how that's been developed or how you manage to operate in the world without that skill, but somehow you get along.
Bottom line? You'll no doubt try to come back with some pithy attempt at deflection. Why? Because you know, deep down, that you're a liar. You know you're ignorant. You feel insecure about the fact that other people can look at you and what you say and write and shake their head in pity at somebody who has all the brainpower of a cabbage. As much as you deny it, it bothers you, because you know you're less than they. So go off, little right-wing sheep, knowing that the people here are disgusted at you but also pity your incredible lack of intellect. Go off knowing that, in the grand scheme of things, you're utterly insignificant for anything other than a tally mark on the sheets of people who lie and cheat and steal and laugh at just how gullible and stupid people like you really are.
I like your way better. Well said.
Maybe he is psychic or you're just easily manipulated?
Ok, ok; Let's admit it. Dkylep is soooo wrong.
You're not a wretched zombie; you're a happy and fulfilled vampire.
Your not alone though, there's a gazzillionaire that spreads Professor Becks wisdom here too. That is, when he's not making million dollar deals.
Maybe you can hook-up with that insubordinate weasel, McChrystal, and share you contempt for our Commander in Chief.
Printing out stacks of Glenn Beck and Alex Jones transcripts on computer paper and putting them in a binders to distribute to your friends is not publishing a book.
By the way milcon, haven't you got any thoughts about Kevin Jennings or the ACTUAL ARTICLE BEING DISCUSSED?
If not, then regardless of your wonderful(alleged) success in life, you are still a TROLL.
DRINK!
Oh wait DRINK
Fox News' programming, while utter sideshow crap, is marketed brilliantly. Fox (and other Murdoch entities) set themselves up as the sole voice of conservatism in this country. And like the authoritarian followers you are, you coming running when they blow the dog whistle.
MSNBC doesn't try to do that. Liberals, being a more open minded group, get their news from a variety of sources and spread the ratings around.
You therefore seem like the equivalent of middle management, so by your standards, I'd place my trust and admiration elsewhere, with a Colonel or General who wrote a book, for example, especially one who ended up on a popular, non-sucky radio show or the 700 Club or something acceptable like that. Then I'd follow him like a dog on a short-leash.
Baseless and irrelevant. Other than that, whattaya got?
You are a LIAR. You are incredibly stupid too. What point do you think you make when you simply regurgitate age old talking points you were TOLD to think and tell ignorant lies? Why dont you go eat another bowl of stupid and let the adults talk?
Funded with "more than $2 million in donations from wealthy liberals." "Among Mr. Brock's donors is Leo Hindery, Jr., the former cable magnate; Susie Tompkins Buell, who is co-founder of the fashion company Esprit and is close to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, and Ms. Buell's husband Mark; and James C. Hormel, a San Francisco philanthropist whose appointment as ambassador to Luxembourg was delayed for a year and a half in the late 1990's by conservative lawmakers protesting what they called his promotion of a 'gay lifestyle.' [2]"
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Media_Matters_for_America
Funny. Not that it matters WHO funds media matters but I find it interesting that you can't even get that right.
So what? Really, before we drag this thread even further off topic, what is the problem with people who have like minded political and social beliefs funding Media Matters?
Let me take this one step further, you know all those ads you have to look at on the Media Matters website? Oh wait, there are NO ADVERTISEMENTS. That would make this something of a non-profit, and not beholden to those advertisers wouldn't it?
Well, that kind of makes your TROLL talking points irrelevant and as off-topic as usual. Why don't you comment on the substance of the article? I doubt you even read the article anyway.
Here is another Amendment that can remedy that.
Praise the Lord!!! Just kidding. Seriously now, that's exactly what must be done!
<b>Death to tyrants!</b>
Obama has NOT invaded any foriegn nations that is a lie you are a LIAR. We have a RIGHT to apprehend criminals suspected of mass murder and if they dont give up they die. That is how it is done. Let me give you some advise. If you are accused of murder and a SWAT team comes to your door? Put your hands up and surrended. If you dont you will DIE. GOD but you are stupid. Yolks is right you are a coward and a troll
To answer your question, a coward! Another answer is a bully.
Distract, disrupt, and flame.
That's what the right wing is reduced to doing since they have no valid defense of their right wing bully heroes on this one.
They are a right-wing propaganda outlet, with no credibility.
They went after Jennings because he's...*GASP* gay, in the meantime they had people on their payroll like 3rd-marriage Newt Gingrich and totally ditzoid Sarah The Quitter.
Not to mention Wack jobs like Glenn Beck, huge egos like O'Reilly, and serial liars like Hannity.
Van Jones resigns early because of a continued smear campaign from Glenn Beck, and Shirley Sherrod is fired almost as soon as the Breitbart smear hits. NPR, Acorn and other organizations buckle under the pressure of targeted right wing smear campaigns, and in the end they never gain back what they lost. Just like a schoolyard bully, giving in and showing weakness only makes them bolder.
On the other hand, Planned Parenthood and Kevin Jennings are examples of those who not did give in and quit when the right wing attack machine was aimed at them. They have persevered in the face of some of the most ugly false allegations and elaborate misinformation campaigns in recent history.
Let this be a lesson to all of those who stand in the way of the radical right wing agenda of division and politics of personal destruction. If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear. If you give in and acquiesce to try and end the attacks, it only enables and empowers them.
Again, being popular doesn't mean you're correct, telling the truth, or not promoting propaganda.
I'll explain this to ya only once:
The reason for the "popularity" of Fox/hate radio is their followers are authoritarians who need constant, repetitive justification for their hateful, xenophobic, mysoginistic, and misguided views of the world because those views are contradicted daily in their everyday lives.
Obama proves that statement.
No, he doesnt, you are a LIAR
I'm going to memorize every word and throw my head away!
That was a pretty sad response.
Apparently, tv ratings are equivalent to credibility in your world...
That must make Jerry Springer and Jersey Shore the most credible TV shows in your world.
So you and the other Fox ditto-heads are in some pretty good company, eh? Who knows... next your boys might be as credible as Kim Kardashin or the Real Housewives.
I mean, you are basically saying that just because Fox has a devoted following of naive and brainwashed meatheads who never leave the couch to do anything else, (let alone check their facts) and who accept any lie the station tells them, that this amounts to some form of credibility.
Heres a news flash for you...
there is a HUGE population of adult people who DONT watch TV (let alone a disgusting and dishonest smear station like Fox) and who get news from truly credible sources like NPR (remember NPR? They are the organization that James OKeefe tried to slander with falsified footage... footage proven false even by Scott baker at Glenn Becks Blaze.)
Since you count yourself among a couch-bound community of ignorant and devoted boob-tube addicts (ones who are so brainwashed they dont even remember the very history they have lived through), I guess the apperance of ratings (and the matching sickness which Fox spreads) makes you assume that the network has something resembling credibility.
You might as well say Hitler or the KKK were credible just because they were popular.
All you have really done with your argument is make happily fuse yourself with a large and pathetic group of brain-washed hate-mongers whose greatest accomplishment is that they watch way too much tv.
Keep up the good work champ!
By the way, Milcon, I had no idea you were such a big fan of "Pitbull" and "Lady Gaga". I know you must think they are the best because they're all over the Billboard charts this week.
You must also believe "America's Got Talent" is the best show on television since besides the NBA playoffs, it's the top rated show in the country right now. "World Wrestling Entertainment RAW" is also topping the cable charts, so I assume you must think that's also of the highest quality.
Typical TROLL Milcon, off-topic with the same weak recycled talking points. Did you even read the article?
I, though, did not have it as bad as these kids. And I will say, that it shouldn't have been shrugged off when I was bullied, and should have been taken more seriously before hand.
And it makes me sick to my stomach that they attacked a man who was trying to end this. Who was trying to let those who were picked on to actually be able to walk around school without fear of being bullied. Though I find it rather amusing that they used the EXACT SAME tactics as school bully's use.
What I find even more amusing, all the fact that many posts of a thumbs down, for what though I wonder...
And just like bullies, they are cowards because they won't justify the thumbs down with a valid response to any comment posted.
You are a LIAR. What we need are less LIARS like you that think telling constant ignorant lies make some kind of point. GOD but you are stupid
"I have also heard more than once that there are no Homos in Israel. Not allowed, not welcome."
Hopefully I'm wrong and that was sarcasm but I don't think it was
Moral of the story? There's only one way to deal with bullies, who only do it for entertainment. Make the cost too high. It's your right to make the bully's life more miserable than they're making yours.
Before you try to make this about Rep Weiner, may I ask you about the the Zadroga Bill?
I mean, it is significant that the GOP held the Zadroga Bill hostage to Bush Era tax cuts for the very most wealthiest Americans; and the only person in the Media who drew attention to this fact was Jon Stewart (yes, even before Shep.)
And the reason why Stewart drew attention to it is because his old friend, Rep Weiner, was the ONLY person in the government who had the backbone to hold the GOPs feet to the fire and hold them accountable for making true American heros the fall-guys for the corporate greed which the GOP has taken to catering (totally at the expense of the country.)
But to someone like you, Weiners work is obviated by the crotch shots that Andrew Breitbart worked so hard to find (and that is something, that a group of full grown adults spent all their winter and spring months following an evasive, certifiable lunatic like Dan Wolfe, just to sniff out a crotch shot... theres the activist spirit for ya!!)
A picture of a penis makes a bigger impression to you than working out policy which actually supports and rewards Americas truest heros (people who really were there when the country needed them most.)
But you keep slavering over that crotch shot like it was made out of ham... your master programmers worked hard to get it get it on for you, so I guess you might as well enjoy it.
Really Milcon, you ought to just surround yourself with pictures of Rep Weiners crotch shot, since that way you always be reminded of the ONE thing Andrew Breitbart may have got right... a thoroughly searched and cited pic of a crotch, found after months of online haranguing.
Milcon to not being an off-topic TROLL: You completely failed.