About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Fox Doctors Hoffa Speech To Fabricate Call For Violence

September 05, 2011 4:55 pm ET by Matt Gertz

Right-wing bloggers misled by dishonest Fox News video editing are attacking Teamsters President James Hoffa for supposedly urging violence against Tea Party activists during a Labor Day speech. Conservatives are also attacking President Obama, who appeared at the event, for "sanctioning violence against fellow Americans" by failing to denounce Hoffa. But fuller context included in other Fox segments makes clear that Hoffa wasn't calling for violence but was actually urging the crowd to vote out Republican members of Congress.

During the segment that the bloggers have latched onto, Fox edited out the bolded portion of Hoffa's comments:

HOFFA: Everybody here's got to vote. If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let's take these son of a bitches out and give America back to America where we belong! Thank you very much!

In an initial report on Hoffa's speech at 1 p.m. on Fox News, Ed Henry reported that Hoffa said that "we'll remember in November who's with the working people" and "said of the Tea Party and of Republicans, 'let's take these sons of bitches out.'"

Henry made clear during that segment that Hoffa's comments were references to voting out Republican members of Congress, not to violence. And roughly 20 minutes later, he explained on Twitter that the "full quote" of the "take these son of a bitches out" comment is "Everybody here's got to vote. If we go back & keep the eye on the prize, let's take these sons of bitches out":

Ed Henry tweet

But in a second segment that ran at roughly the same time as Henry's tweet, Fox News dishonestly edited the speech in the manner seen above. Andrew Breitbart's Big sites, Real Clear Politics, The Daily Caller, the Media Research Center, and the Drudge Report have all highlighted that footage, using it to condemn "the violence emanating from union thug bosses" and demand that Obama "denounce" the comments.

In the Fox News segment that included the dishonestly cropped video, Republican consultant Brad Blakeman decried the comments as "thuggery at its best" and "the kind of remarks you'd expect out of Tony Soprano," and commented that "when a union president says 'let's take these sons of bitches out,' that usually means someone's legs are going to get broken, somebody's going to disappear." Meanwhile, anchor Megyn Kelly somehow did not mention Henry's previous explanation that the comments were references to voting Republicans out of office.

Andrew Breitbart operative and CNN contributor Dana Loesch quickly followed up the attack on Twitter, claiming soon after the Fox segment and Henry tweet that Hoffa "threatens tea party voters" and that if Obama "doesn't condemn then he is sanctioning violence against fellow Americans by silence":

loesch tweets

Breitbart's websites also jumped onboard, circulating the cropped Fox News video of the Hoffa speech and describing it as a "threat of violence." Other right-wing media outlets soon followed.

Loesch's comments in particular were already way over the top. But they became truly embarrassing at around 3 p.m., when the whole story collapsed after Fox finally got around to airing what Henry had called the "full quote" of Hoffa's "take these son of a bitches out" comment:

As Henry noted, Hoffa was actually referencing "what he thinks unions are going to do to take Republicans out of office." We'll see if that puts a stop to the ongoing right-wing freakout over the comments. 

UPDATE: Hours after Fox News aired the full context of the "take these son of a bitches out" comment, the network reverted to form. In the first segment on The Five, Fox again aired a dishonestly edited version of Hoffa's remarks that cropped out his references to voting. Watch:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Liberal in the South (September 05, 2011 5:04 pm ET)
      50 2
      ah the power of context.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 5:09 pm ET)
        45 4
        They did the same thing with the "Dean scream." Of course, that was the so-called "main stream" press.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by PBVV (September 05, 2011 7:39 pm ET)
          43 1
          First off, --Why not ask Hoffa's spokespersons to address Hoffa's comments?

          2. , why not invite the Michigan DNC Chair rather than the Chair from S.Carolina, of all places?

          3. ,
          Why weren't the first words out of S.Carolina DNC Chair Dick Harpootlian's mouth:

          "Megyn and Editors, Why was this video edited this way to distort Hoffa's intent and meaning???
          Please play the unedited clip now and then perhaps we can have an honest discussion about Hoffa's statement in it's entirety."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kamrom (September 06, 2011 4:16 am ET)
            18 4
            From the right's perspective, all those are terrible things. Anything that makes them confront their lies and idiocy is automatically evil to them.

            Think about the upcoming repeal of DADT. They challenged it constantly, attacked constantly. Why? Because none of those rightwing clods were in the military. Those who shouldve been (mccain being a notable exception to this) instead used political influence to get cushy stay at home jobs.

            So once it becomes undeniable that this group that they so routinely attack, that they say will destroy america, is shown to be about 10,000 times braver than the reupblicans? That'll make them look like idiots.

            And not only that; It will rapidly become apparent that gay people have been putting their lives on the line, even when they couldnt admit to who they were for fear of being kicked out for no reason other than that, all so the republicans will have the freedom to say whatever vile thing they want without censorship.

            And you can basically take al lthat and apply it to any republicans nonsense whining. And that by itself is all you need to explain the rightwing's behavior. Things tend to fight and scream and thrash the loudest right before their demise.

            Cracks are coming from all sides. Their margains shrink lower and lower. Criminals. Liars. Hateful bigots. Manipulators. Thats who we're dealing with, and that group grows ever more monstrous in a desperate bid to hold on to its relevancy.

            So if you think this is bad, wait til you see what they do next month. Wait til you see what they do once people at Fox become indicted for hacking computers and phones. Theyre just gonna get worse. And I mean, wow, we can hardly even imagine that at this point. Youd think they couldnt get any more evil. But then I thought that when Bush was in office and BOY was I wrong!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by katanakumori (September 06, 2011 9:53 am ET)
              9 32
              Typical liberal-socialist double standard.

              "the battle that we face" "The war on workers" "only one way to beat and win that war" "we like a good fight" "They've got a war, they got a war with us and there's only going to be one winner" "We're going to win that war" "President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let's take these son of b!tches out"

              Anytime liberal-socialists use violent rhetoric it's always "taken out of context". How convenient. Sarah Palin uses USGS map symbols to mark places on a map and the liberal-socialists shriek "they are sniper scope symbols and she wants people to kill and she caused the Giffords shooting!!!"

              Hoffa talks about marching to war to win the battle with Obama's army to take the sons of b!tches out and it's "taken out of context". I guess what he really meant was for America to work together to solve the problems we face as a united country.

              Maybe for the Union Gangster Goons this is mild language that is to be tolerated by the Dems because they are bankrolled by these blackmailing thugs.

              You idiots define hypocritical!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 9:58 am ET)
                27 8
                Besides your obvious anger issues, you seriously need to do some reading about union history. Try the Bread and Roses strike in 1912 in Massachusetts. Then perhaps consider what you're really doing with all that misplaced anger of yours.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 10:03 am ET)
                  13 2
                  You are so consistent and reasonable Mary, do you never lash out irrationally? Heehee, patience is a virtue relegated to the virtuous I suppose.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 10:38 am ET)
                    14 3
                    Well I try not to. Watching all these folks like doughnut lover rant & rave doesn't get me riled up--he's just so obviously needy and delusional.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 10:40 am ET)
                      10 3
                      Oops. Wrong wing-nut. They seem interchangeable though.

                      I noticed on another thread that kantakerous was raving and then becoming somewhat reasonable but when it came down to it, he disappeared, and then popped up kidney bean. Makes ya wonder, eh?
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 10:44 am ET)
                      17 1
                      But this statement by Hoffa Jr has a large percentage of our resident trolls all on 1 thread which is weird, this of all silly things is red-meat to them? There is a deeper issue I am sure to be missing. Oh well, Jimmy must have have touched a chord that really got'em dancing.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by JP (September 06, 2011 1:22 pm ET)
                        8 1
                        I believe it's called the TRUTH! And the baggers just can't handle it. After years of fox and right wing hate radio lying to them about everything, they refuse to believe anything that even comes close to the truth.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:11 pm ET)
                             
                          you wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit you jp both sides are constantly lying to us and i see youv'e choosen to believe a particular set of lies all on your own. by the way it's the tea party we're not holding any hand out bags thanks.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:42 am ET)
                        4  
                        It's people who work for a living using rough language that's supposed to be reserved for trust fund babies, millionaire radio bobbleheads, and the gullible retirees and losers who love them.
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by katanakumori (September 06, 2011 10:42 am ET)
                  7 24
                  Nice the way you completely avoided Hoffa's violent speech and chose to attack me instead.

                  Do you think his words were appropriate to Obama's call for civility?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 10:47 am ET)
                    17 2
                    I like non-PC dems myself, it blessed us with your invaluable opinion this morning katrinakumori.....
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by So Fain (September 06, 2011 1:57 pm ET)
                    8 1
                    Violent speech? Try again.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 2:12 pm ET)
                    11 2
                    Do you think it's appropriate that Fox News and the GOP want to hurt Americans?

                    Why do Fox News and the Republicans want to hurt Americans?

                    Why do Fox News and the Republicans hate Americans?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by katanakumori (September 06, 2011 2:25 pm ET)
                      3 22
                      The simple truth is if a Republican spoke this way about Dems you hypocrites would be shrieking like a pack of howler monkeys.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Persia (September 06, 2011 2:34 pm ET)
                        19 3
                        Republicans say much worse about Obama and the democrats every single day. You are just a hypocrite and a crybaby.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by JudePro (September 06, 2011 4:06 pm ET)
                             
                          Exactly. They can sure dish it out, but they can't stand the same kind of treatment. They don't want a REAL fight. They just want to be the bully on the block. One counter-punch and they go crying to mommy. Get a life, you reactionary momma's boy...
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by The_Cat (September 06, 2011 2:49 pm ET)
                        12 2
                        The simple truth, katanakumori, is that there has been a war in this country the last 40 years or so. It's class warfare, and the wealthy have been and continue to win it every singe day. They rely on Fox Propagnada and Faux Cons/Republicans at all levels of government to keep them in their un-earned lavish lifestyles.

                        You don't have to believe it, but it is demonstrably true. Check out the last forty years of wage history. Check out the percentage of income tax revenue paid by corporations over the last forty years.

                        Lastly ,get back on topic. Fox deliberately lied when they aired edited video of Hoffa to make him look bad. What you're complaining about with your howler monkey comment DIDN'T EVEN HAPPEN.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:13 pm ET)
                            1
                          it wasn't edited for your imformation it just wasn't played in it's entirety. unlike most liberals the rest of us don't need to fabricate truth to get it out there.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:51 am ET)
                          6 1
                          What you're complaining about with your howler monkey comment DIDN'T EVEN HAPPEN.


                          It hasn't really caught on, but since the dimwits have been slacking off with their Soros Tourettes, I've been trying to get a new drinking game up and running.

                          A shot for every time they use that magical "If" in their arguments. It's a variation on the Begging the Question logical fallacy.

                          They pull some hypothetical prediction out of their tar hole, and accuse people of " Hypocrisy" for not treating their hallucinations the same as things that actually happened.

                          They think we're supposed to accept their " If...then" BS.

                          The right wingers have a tough time separating their fantasies from reality.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 07, 2011 12:51 pm ET)
                            2
                          Hoffa incited violence on Labor Day. Hoffa's speech was the opposite of Obama's speech back in January in Tuscon concerning Americas lack of "Civil Discourse". Yet, not all that ironic, Obama the eternal campaigner and COWARD did not politely reject a single word spewed by Hoffa.

                          Cat you can slice and dice and twist Hoffa's words any way you choose. Hoffa's speech is Viral now and American's have watched his speech in full. Hoffa clearly incited violence Cat. Hoffa's speech was not Diplomatic, Constructive or demonstrated a willingness for Unity what so ever. Hoffa tore down any resemblence of working together. No, Hoffa drove a wedge deeper that divides the classes.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 3:24 pm ET)
                        10  
                        Unions keep workers' wages, rights, and benefits up. Fighting against those unions hurts the workers because it would reduce those wages, rights, and benefits. This is not complicated.

                        Why do Fox News and the Republicans want to hurt Americans?

                        Why do Fox News and the Republicans hate Americans?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 07, 2011 12:58 pm ET)
                            2
                          Obama has taught casting blame very well to you.
                          88% of American Workers survive just fine without any Union representation. Why can't you?

                          You see, good employees with confidence in themselves never question any need for having Union Representation. Many good employees have made themselves smarter and more valuable by going to college and leading by example. Good employees do not need Unions. Good employees make good wages, insurance and earn vacations and raises. Obama has destroyed the Insurance benefit now with at least 60% of the businesses nationwide, but that is another chapter. Unions have convinced you that you cannot survive without them. Joke is on you.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 3:27 pm ET)
                        5  
                        OMFG, are you SERIOUS? Get help. Seriously, check yourself in. You have got to be mentally ill. Don't wait around to get your affairs in order, because you're probably not competent to do so, if that comment is to be taken seriously.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by cjj (September 06, 2011 4:14 pm ET)
                        8 2
                        The right speaks this way about Dems, their party and the current president every day...even worse. If you actually believe differently you are in total denial.

                        Fact is...the kid gloves are off this time around. Dems know of what the right is capable. What really scares the righty-tighty-up-and-whitey folks is the left is finally willing to stand up and fight the tactics that have been used to keep them down in the past. Maybe there is reason behind the insecurity of the right. Paybacks are the real bitches...
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by north of the border (September 06, 2011 8:56 pm ET)
                            1
                          Racist comment cjj. Hoffa's comments were meant as a threat and thus are violent. To pretend otherwise is delusional. After the call for civility in politics from the left it is hypocritical. Simply is.
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 3:33 pm ET)
                    11 1
                    I am curious, katana. What is it exactly about the rhetoric that you find so scary and violent? Is it the "take em out" part? I know you are a truly frightened, frightened man. And, that you do not always even know what you are afraid of, you simply believe what you are told you believe. Nothing proved that more than our "debate" on basic Economics. But, I find your thought process fascinating. As a sace-study. So, what is it in this speech that terrifies you so much?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by katanakumori (September 06, 2011 5:32 pm ET)
                      6 17
                      I'm not frightened of anything. Just pointing out the hypocritical double standard the left has when it comes to violent rhetoric.

                      You bunch are the sad & pathetic losers as evidenced by that moron you put in the Oval Office. Obama is setting RECORD LOW APPROVAL numbers! He is a complete failure and all you idiots do is blame everyone but the Buffoon in Chief.

                      All you can do now is shriek "racist" and "it's all FOX News' fault" when in reality your worshiping a nitwit financed by union thugs who see their gangster power being taken away by those who see them for what they are, basically free-loading thugs who blackmailed business for their unsupportable pensions & skyrocketing overhead costs.

                      You nanny state socialists are seeing the end of your easy money and you are terrified.

                      I laugh at you losers, just as I'll be laughing when Obama waves goodbye at the end of his first & last miserable failure of a term.

                      The truth hurts and you know it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 5:43 pm ET)
                        9  
                        Well katrinkakant-thinka, as long as YOU will be happy, I am all for it, now PLEASE tell me where all that 'easy money' is hiding, no one gave me the memo.......
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 6:37 pm ET)
                        10 2
                        So, you have no idea what the violent rhetoric was or why you are so afraid of it. You just know that you believe whatever you are told to believe. Got it.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mjlilgui (September 06, 2011 7:54 pm ET)
                          4 1
                          He doesn't find it violent and he is not afraid of it. His eyes just lit up with another chance to chase a non sequitur and drop his patented "Buffoon in Chief" dig, no matter how little sense he makes.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 10:28 am ET)
                          5  
                          Katrinka backed herself into a corner, and had to admit that Hoffa's language wasn't violent at all.

                          But she was able to use that jumping-off point to call the president names, and whine that people notice her racism.

                          The quality of the trolls here has really declined.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 10:07 pm ET)
                        3  
                        Yes, the truth hurts. The one that hurts the most, for me, is that so many people are gullible enough to vote against their own interests.

                        I guess that when you're easily led by even the mildly charismatic, you've got to expect them to feed you whatever enriches them while keeping you weakened to the point that if you ever do wake up, you'll be powerless to stand in their way.

                        At long last, they don't care about you! You won't be among the empowered if they take over.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by cjj (September 08, 2011 2:25 pm ET)
                        1  
                        Yep, and while you're wasting your time with juvenile name-calling over the Internet, we are serious about putting Obama right back in that Oval Office for another 4 years.

                        So, go ahead, child, continue...
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by s v SunshineDaydream (September 06, 2011 9:38 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Wrong, Wrong and Wrong again. Listen to the speech and you will see there was no hint of violence. All the political violence that I'm aware of has been perpetrated on the left by crazy right(WRONG)wingers. Does Gabriel Giffords name mean anything to you ? The list goes on and on. The left supports peace, my dear. You are the war mongers that the rest of humanity despises. RIP tea party, you will fade fast like a nasty boil on Americas bottom.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by durrrr (September 06, 2011 12:21 pm ET)
                    1
                  did you really have to go back 100 years to find union strike that was civilized? verizon strike-strikers disrupted business and stalked employees, wisconsin - union supporters vandalize school prior to scheduled walker visit, Michigan last month - business owner catches someone carving 'scab' in his car and gets shot.

                  Mary - why don't YOU do some reading on union current events
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by kdfreed (September 06, 2011 10:35 pm ET)
                  8  
                  We've listened for two years now to the tea drunk reich-wing hate machine "trolling for assassins" and promoting seditious violence, and now the tea creeps are wetting their pants?

                  I call B.S. This is simply another chapter in the tea party saga bent on spreading discontent and inciting violence against anyone who has the cajones to stand up for working people.

                  "United country" you say? I fell off my chair spewing outrageous laughter. Guess you think everyone is as brain dead as you are?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 07, 2011 12:41 pm ET)
                     
                  In 1973, the United States Supreme Court actually ruled to grant union officials the special privilege to be exempt from federal prosecution for union violence. Hmmmm....what is wrong with this playing field?

                  According to the National Institute for Labor Relations Research, a right-to-work think tank in Washington, there have been 4,400 incidents of union violence in the last 20 years.

                  The Teamsters are the leading perpetrators, with 454 incidents. But IBEW is in the top 10, having engaged in 125 incidents.

                  All told, there have been 11,600 incidents of union violence against workers, management and the public since 1975.

                  Take the murder of Eddie York, a nonunion contractor, who was shot in the back of the head and killed while leaving a worksite in 1993. Trumka and other UMW officials were charged in a $27 million wrongful death suit by Eddie York’s widow. After fighting the suit intensely for four years, UMW lawyers settled suddenly in 1997 -- just two days after the judge in the case ruled evidence in the criminal trial would be admitted.

                  Richard Trumka is the most dishonest SOB in AFLCIO history. One of his Goons shoots Eddie York in the most Cowardly manner, in the back of his head in cold blood. No apology, no remorse and not a care in the world for Eddies 3 young children or Widow. RICHARD TRUMKA IS A YELLOW COWARD AND OBAMAS BEST FRIEND.

                  Later, as Secretary-Treasurer of the AFL-CIO, Trumka pleaded the Fifth Amendment before Congress and a court-appointed election monitor over his role in an illegal fundraising scheme to benefit the Teamsters president Ron Carey’s re-election. Trumka has remained in his position ever since despite an AFL-CIO rule (adopted in 1957) which held that union officials who plead the Fifth have “no right to continue to hold office” in the union umbrella organization.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by Bongo Fury (September 06, 2011 10:01 am ET)
                13 3
                Well aren't you a loyal, plastic robot for the right wing noise machine.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 10:05 am ET)
                  13 4
                  katanakumori maybe is Michelle Malkin, ooh whee, what venom!
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 10:23 am ET)
                    10 3
                    ha ha ha ha ha the well-fed tea-bagger lady-rep is on CNN right now having an induced breech-birth of self righteous anger over Hoffa's statement......do I sense a wondeful opportunity to send them all over the edge ?? We haven't even completed the primaries yet....I smell an insane and poorly thought out Republican nominee in the offing. Can you say 'unelectable' baggers?
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:20 pm ET)
                     
                  all i see here are obama worshipers hail the messiah it's all bush's and fox news fault that the commie we put in office doesn't know what he's doing or who he's associated with. bunch of zombies if ya ask me
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by Persia (September 06, 2011 10:53 am ET)
                13 2
                You right-wing trolls are hilarious. You make violent comments directed towards Obama and democrats all the time. Then you pretend that mean old James Hoffa said something mean about you idiots. You just like being crybabies. Cry me a river. In case you didn't get the obvious you right-wing morons are the HYPOCRITES.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by durrrr (September 06, 2011 12:15 pm ET)
                     
                  You're a little off the mark. the right wingers complaint is that lefties are hypocritical when it comes to violent speech. calling them hypocrites for calling someone else hypocrites is a little silly.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by ExpatVoice (September 06, 2011 11:47 am ET)
                   
                Can you tell us what the nonviolent meaning of tea party/GOP candidate Sharron Angle's statement that "if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies" is?

                Now this is a real threat to use violence, and it can't be parsed or explained any other way.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 12:19 pm ET)
                8 2
                It's rather laughable for you to claim liberals are always complaining about being taken out of context--on a matter where we can clearly see that Fox edited Hoffa's speech .

                Hypocritical, sez you? Double standard, sez you?

                If Hoffa gives a speech where he makes a "joke" about putting poison into John Boehner's wine, see how we respond and then discuss it with us. If Hoffa pretends to pour gasoline on a person sitting to his side and says, "This is what Mitch McConnell wants to do to you," see how we respond and then discuss it with us.

                Until then as we continue to see clear and obvious distortions manufactured through editing intended to create artificial controversy you'd better believe we'll justifiably call it, "out of context."
                Report Abuse
              • Author by cripto9t709 (September 06, 2011 1:41 pm ET)
                5  
                Clinging to propaganda that was called out, is only going to get you ridicule and maybe a sad, sad human response.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by buzzylogic (September 06, 2011 2:12 pm ET)
                   
                On March 23, Palin tweeted to her supporters a note about the aforementioned Facebook message, writing, "Commonsense Conservatives & lovers of America: 'Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!' Pls see my Facebook page." And as Politico's Jonathan Martin points out, in November Palin boasted about defeating 18 of the 20 members on her "bullseye" list.

                USGS Map symbols, my left foot! Yes, I said "left."

                You hypocrites define idiotic.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by cjj (September 06, 2011 3:41 pm ET)
                5 2
                We are hypocritical? Palin goes and says her the intention of her comments/maps were in reference to "voting" and we are expected to accept her word even though she refuses to change her rhetoric. Hoffa does the same thing and actually refers to voting but it is wrong? Do you ever actually take time to hear yourself? Or are the voices on a rampage again?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:22 pm ET)
                     
                  hoffa never mentioned voting but he did say war alot try reading it again as if a republican had said it about moveon.org or something
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by nofairfights (September 07, 2011 12:56 am ET)
                     
                  It's amusing at least. He's not upset about violent rhetoric in general, just his presupposed hypocrisy of liberals and progressives.

                  Typical really since the conservative movement is steeped in hate speech, he just gets mad about some perceived double standard. Eeesh.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by David G (September 06, 2011 8:07 pm ET)
                4 2
                My o my, here we have another paid professional right wing blogger. What company do you work for? Where do they find you clowns????
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bebitaviv (September 06, 2011 9:06 pm ET)
                   
                Please, comment on something when you heard the real version of the things and not what Faux News showed. "Vote" they took that part off, how convenient. You are the idiot!!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by s v SunshineDaydream (September 06, 2011 9:29 pm ET)
                   
                Sorry Katanakumori... You lose big. Yes Hoffa called you "Son's of Bitche's" and said "In November(election day) let's take these S O B's out" of office. What is it you don't understand about our voting process? Maybe you prefer Ricky Perry's speech "lets get them down here in texas and treat them real bad". The world is passing you by. Your old road is rapidly fading. So long... you are a relic from the pastand you look real dusty.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 08, 2011 1:05 am ET)
                   
                Kat....^5. To think...Richard Trumka stole $150,000 from the AFLCIO when he was Secretary Treasurer in 1997 and gave it to Ron Carey's Campaign, who was running against Jimmy Hoffa for the Teamsters Presidency. I wonder if there is any animosity between Trumka and Hoffa today....both are Buddies with Obama. Essentially, Trumka ripped off $150,000 and bet it all against Hoffa and Carey won...only to be stripped of the Presidency after Trumkas theft of AFLCIO funds were discovered....and the AFLCIO is still out of $150,000. Great Work Dick!
                Report Abuse
        • Author by VictorLaszlo (September 05, 2011 7:42 pm ET)
          33 3
          There's no such thing as the 'Dean Scream.' It was 100% fabricated. I mean, yes, Dean screamed. But it was entirely normal behavior, and not notable in any way.

          (I think mary59 would agree - I'm just expanding on her comment)

          See also: Teleprompter

          How do I know this Dana Loesch is a moron/shill/both? She used 'prompter' as a joke.

          Maybe we should try a 'teleprompter'-style smear of Boehner. Let's see.. lapels! He always wears a suit with lapels! Ha-ha, Boehner is 'Lapel-Boy' now! Pass it on!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by GreenLantern (September 05, 2011 8:06 pm ET)
            24 1
            I remember seeing a show (something like on "Democracy Now" or something like that) sometime shortly after that infamous "Dean scream" that showed that all the clips of it on most of the major networks had been speeded up so that it sounded more shrill then it really was to make him sound crazier. Know why? He was the frontrunner (at least in funding at the time) and said a week or so earlier that he was thinking of breaking up the big media monopolies in an interview. That is why ALL the media worked so hard to destroy his chance at running for president, he would have creamed bush!
            They are all in bed together, make no mistake about it!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ginnyinco (September 05, 2011 10:49 pm ET)
              13 1
              Did you also hear who was most responsible for that? Robert Gibbs. If I remember correctly, he was working for Kerry at the time.

              Disappointing that Kerry was anyway connected to this. I was and still am a huge supporter. (I have not forgotten the rock star crowds who came to his speeches during the campaign and in '06. Plenty of folks liked his speaking quite well.)

              Kind of explained Gibbs being chosen for press secretary and his 'attitude' towards the left base.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:27 pm ET)
                   
                kerry was horrible in the same interview he said he's for the war then not 30 seconds later he say's he's against it no i don't have a link but he did this type of thing in all his campaign interviews i was really surprised so many people did vote for this guy who had no clear opinion about anything.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 08, 2011 1:22 am ET)
                 
              On January 19, 2004, Dean's campaign suffered a staggering blow when a last-minute surge by rivals John Kerry and John Edwards led to a disappointing third-place finish for Dean in the 2004 Iowa Democratic caucuses.....and then came the Dean Scream
              Report Abuse
          • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:23 pm ET)
               
            100% percent fabricated? i saw it live it was a scream but i still don't see why he was droped as a canidate he seemed ok to me
            Report Abuse
        • Author by gg (September 05, 2011 10:27 pm ET)
          12 1
          Oh, that damn "liberal" press misleading the public again!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by WandaLou (September 06, 2011 2:01 pm ET)
             
          It was sexist though. They wouldn't have done this if he'd been female. :)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (September 05, 2011 5:20 pm ET)
        27 2
        Yes and some folks say that stretching the truth by leaving out context is NOT telling a big fat lie! They are morally bankrupt if they think that is true. The poor things obviously either ignored those value speeches their parents gave or their parents are also goofed up. Of course, Fox has special employees that they hired for the express purpose of doctoring facts so that they are unrecognizable. But in the end, we all know just how Fox displays their animus towards those who think differently than their stated group think. Must just crimp anyone's mental process to always have to adjust to those ridiculous distortions. I am really feeling sorry for Hannity, Loesch, etc, etc. to have to sell your soul to work for some company is a very high price to pay for employment. Poor, poor things!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ilovedoughnuts (September 06, 2011 5:12 am ET)
          1 25
          "Of course, Fox has special employees that they hired for the express purpose of doctoring facts so that they are unrecognizable."

          ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha - whoo-eeee!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (September 06, 2011 9:26 am ET)
            19 5
            Why are you laughing? It's true. Just because you are too much of an authoritarian groupie to recognize that you're being yanked around like a bull with a ring in his nose by this faux conservative propaganda network doesn't mean that what mari2jj said wasn't true.

            Get a clue. There is NOTHING conservative about Fox nor is there any "news" to be had there. It is owned by the same corporation which has made most of its money by using tabloid (read The Globe; The Star and National Enquirer) journalism. You're being had, ILD, and you're too indoctrinated to realize it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 10:31 am ET)
            8 2
            judging by this incident, that is not very far out of the line.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 10:48 am ET)
            8 2
            There is nothing funny about that regrettably truthful statement.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 3:15 pm ET)
            5 1
            Anything of substance to add?

            How about a riddle for you? What do you call someone who baits you with money (via a promise of lower taxes) then tries to take it away again (along with your benefits and rights, by working to bust up the union that helps make sure you're not paid in script)?

            Hint: It's the same person who tells you a corporation is a person, but fights against affording them the punishments a real person would get for the actual wrongdoings of that very corporation.

            Well, if you said a "sociopath", it'd be hard to disagree. However, the answer we were looking for was "Republican." We would have also accepted "Tea partier" or "Tea bagger."
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 10:32 am ET)
              2  
              Anything of substance to add?


              Oh, I'm sorry, how rude. Barscotch, this is donutluvver. You should have been introduced, would have saved you the trouble of asking that question.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (September 06, 2011 3:21 pm ET)
          9
        Context, here is what he said.

        “We got to keep an eye on the battle that we face: The war on workers. And you see it everywhere, it is the Tea Party. And you know, there is only one way to beat and win that war. The one thing about working people is we like a good fight. And you know what? They’ve got a war, they got a war with us and there’s only going to be one winner. It’s going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We’re going to win that war,” Hoffa told thousands of workers gathered for the annual Labor Day rally.
        “President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march… Everybody here’s got a vote…Let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong,” he concluded

        So the Tea Party is having a war on workers? I guess the folks that are in Tea Parties do not work?

        I read it a few times, he still seems to being saying to take out the SOB's
        Report Abuse
        • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 3:35 pm ET)
          8 1
          markbfoot199, pretend I'm your boss. You've done a good job for 20 years, but I want a bonus, so I have to let you and 150 others go. You might say I need cause to fire you, but this is a layoff. Do you ever get called back? No. Is this legal? Well, you make some calls and find out that, thanks to some recent state-level Republican-led labor law changes, it is now.

          Meanwhile, if you go after another job (at which you'll get entry-level pay & bennies) you'll forfeit this one.

          Still think the politicians who made it possible for me to keep you and thousands of others out of work and on the dole indefinitely while simultaneously lowering what the dole gives you aren't against you? Are you that unintelligent?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (September 06, 2011 3:47 pm ET)
            2 12
            Bar, ever ask yourself why you need a union, my only guess is your under educated, have no idea how to find your own job, want someone else tell you what to do and how much money your worth. I like right to work states, I can control my wages, pick the job I want and do not have to count on anyone else.

            FYI, if I had 20 yrs experience in a right to work state I could go after the better paying job, sure if I was a union man I would have to let some union boss tell me what I am worth, no thanks.

            I know this may be a surprise to you, but no one has keep me out of a job my wages have not lowered in my career.

            Last, Bar, sure also a individual that waits around for government to help you in a disaster, not one that takes care of himself.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 3:53 pm ET)
              9 2
              hey stupid, if you can't spell on a third grade level you should should refrain from 'schooling' people. Now go take care of yourself, and I want you to use the big boy potty from now on.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 3:57 pm ET)
                7  
                Just when you think the stink has faded another ones comes in to fart. lol.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 5:10 pm ET)
                  9 1
                  seriously dude, the 'crazy' must be half-off in righty kingdom today, they loaded up and came here to....you are definitely gonna have to help me finish THIS one, as I haven't a clue. Of all the silly crap one or two trolls will show up and defend, THIS is their issue? Do they believe that 'great vengence and FURIOUS anger' could be the possible result of three uninterrupted years of Obama-bashing? They expected Jimes Hoffa Jr. to be POLITE when addressing the TeaBaggers, who want to destroy Unions and democracy in one fell- swoop?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:46 pm ET)
                      1
                    democracy is alive and well in the tea party, liberals are trying to stomp it out every chance they get or haven't you been paying attention
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by north of the border (September 06, 2011 9:10 pm ET)
                   
                Highly intelligent remark, NOT.I watched Hoffa being interview after the speech controversy and he admitted what he said and the context. It was meant violently and he was unapologetic about it, it fact he repeated it. This isn't about Fox news.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 4:26 pm ET)
              4 2
              You won't be guaranteed commensurate pay or benefits when seeking the new job. Unions virtually guarantee you that.

              And did you miss the part where I'm doing this to get a bonus? I'm not undereducated, I've lived both sides and know plenty others who have.

              Unless you are part of that richest one percent, you have no more to say because you are voting against your own interests when you vote against the unions.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:47 pm ET)
                  1
                union workers are lazy and over paid been working next to them for years in construction.there the most worthless group on any construction site
                Report Abuse
            • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 5:00 pm ET)
              9 2
              your under educated

              I love our trolls sometimes.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 5:17 pm ET)
                5 1
                I know being smart is tough, well beyond my claim to fame anyway, but if you show up with all the stupid written on your FOREHEAD, mercy seems futile to expect. Did they all feel EMPOWERED today? (Sorry, I use caps like stink-bait for R fish) Somebody on the other team used a SWEAR word? I thought our trolls were stupid, not middle-schoolers...
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Scootah (September 06, 2011 5:23 pm ET)
                   
                You'reunder educated.

                Innit?
                Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 5:07 pm ET)
              6 3
              Mark, you have clearly never been in management. Or even made it past the fifth grade considering your belief that there are no programs in existence today that started under FDR. So, I will give you a break.

              I have been in management for years. And, it is a simple common sense fact of life that management will never pay their workers what they deserve without collective bargaining. No employee will ever have the same position of strength individually as they would collectively. Even highly skilled labor like MLB players need a strong union to get their fair share of the profits. Because that is simple common sense. What is truly sad is that you actually need this explained to you. But, like I said, based on your past ignorance it should not be a surprise at all.

              "FYI, if I had 20 yrs experience in a right to work state I could go after the better paying job, sure if I was a union man I would have to let some union boss tell me what I am worth, no thanks." - Mark

              See, you seem woefully ignorant of how collective bargaining works. You think the union decides what the pay is going to be? Have you ever actually had a job, Mark?

              "I know this may be a surprise to you, but no one has keep me out of a job my wages have not lowered in my career." - Mark

              You seem even more confused than usual, Mark. And, that is saying something for you. You think that you have negotiated the highest possible wage that you could by yourself? And did better than you could have collectively? It is simply impossible to be this stupid. My guess: you've never negotiated any contract EVER.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by markbfoot199 (September 06, 2011 6:18 pm ET)
                1 10
                Mike, so what you are saying is you’re the management guy that has high turnover. I good manager does pay well, has lower turnover and takes care of those that take care of them.
                Keep it simple for you all, you all just stand there and keep fighting as your jobs go overseas because you all want 80K to put a bolt on a tire. Well, what do you have now, NOTHING! When you give up your union and head south we will have a well paying job for you.
                The Bonus Question, well if the manager is the owner he can do as he pleases, if he is just middle management, well you’re full of crap.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 8:44 pm ET)
                  4 1
                  You talk about it like what that person just does is put that bolt and go home. Works like manufacturing are high risk jobs considering all that delicate machinery which tended to love eating fingers. The least an employee should get is some sort of compensation. After all, they are investing their precious time and life. Do you really not see a problem over the fact that the CEO/head of company would rather use slaves (because that's what you can pretty much call their sweatshop workers) instead of paying their employees something they can just pocket more money they won't even use?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by mikehuck76 (September 07, 2011 1:53 pm ET)
                    1
                  "I good manager does pay well, has lower turnover and takes care of those that take care of them." - Mark

                  No idea what that was supposed to mean, other than to make everyone chuckle. What does that have to do with union wages?

                  "Keep it simple for you all, you all just stand there and keep fighting as your jobs go overseas because you all want 80K to put a bolt on a tire. Well, what do you have now, NOTHING! When you give up your union and head south we will have a well paying job for you." - Mark

                  Riiight. Because we need to lower our wages here to compete with Indonesia. Not raise trade tariffs to compete globally since we have the consumers here. What a moron. Have you ever had a job, Mark? Take a look at the companies that move overseas. They don't do it because they are going out of business. They do it to increase profits. Because they can pay slave wages in Indonesia and pay a 2% trade tariff to still sell their good here as if they were an American company. Grow up, child.

                  "The Bonus Question, well if the manager is the owner he can do as he pleases, if he is just middle management, well you’re full of crap." - Mark

                  No, no, no NO. First of all, your bonus question was not even a question. But, we have learned to maintain very low expectations for you, Mark. I am sure you hear that everywhere you go. Every company is beholden to market prices. Whether it be the middle management or the CEO. Learn something, would ya. For your own sake.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 08, 2011 1:48 am ET)
                  1
                Was a Teamster for 6 years, left the Teamsters and doubled my Pay in Management. Moved on, started a manufacturing business, built my own 12,000 sq ft Plant on 3 acres, 15 employees and are currently having the biggest year yet in 2011. You know why? I pay my employees well, I treat them with respect and I never Lie to my employees. When the market crashed in 2008 we had very slow months, but we didn't lay anyone off. I did not receive a paycheck some weeks but my employees still did.

                Mike & Chuck, you couldn't be more condescending to Mark if you tried. But I believe I accidently discovered why. Your Blanket attack on those who succeed in the workforce without Unions is not a one size fits all. If it were meant to be, Unions would have more than 12% of the workforce.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 7:30 pm ET)
              5 1
              Yes, I've often asked myself why I or anyone needs unions. The answer I have come up with is that the majority of corporations who do the hiring will not, as a matter of course, compensate people fairly of their own volition. You must not have ever studied any history of labor relations at all if you seriously have to ask that question.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by kdfreed (September 06, 2011 10:46 pm ET)
              2 1
              "Right to work"... that's lovely... kind of like putting makeup on a pig and calling it Marilyn Monroe.

              I guess that works for the near-sighted, but those with 20/20 get the picture alright: Right to work = endentured servitude.

              Once you've lost your job, pension, and health care, you can happily join the ranks of the homeless and console yourself with the fact that you achieved it all on your own.

              Not sure what makes tea partiers think their corporate sponsors will spare them... you're expendable, too.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by BobsYourUncle (September 07, 2011 12:38 am ET)
              3  
              Bar, ever ask yourself why you need a union, my only guess is your under educated, have no idea how to find your own job, want someone else tell you what to do and how much money your worth. I like right to work states, I can control my wages, pick the job I want and do not have to count on anyone else.


              Well that explains why Rush limpballs is in a union now what about the other 14 million workers?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 3:39 pm ET)
          6 1
          "Everybody here's got a vote. Let's take these sons of bitches out.."

          If that frightens you, it says more about you and your teabaggers than it does the speaker. Apparently, you teabaggers are scared of elections. Not surprising.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (September 06, 2011 3:48 pm ET)
            1 9
            Nope, we sweep last time, and will even more this time
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 3:54 pm ET)
              6 1
              In your dreams maggot.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 4:00 pm ET)
              8 1
              You mean the election where less than half of the voting age population voted?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 5:01 pm ET)
              7 1
              You "sweep last time"? OooooK. Wanna try that again in English?

              Hey, Mark, did you ever figure out that there are still programs in effect today that started under FDR? Or did you ever figure out that Arabs did play a part in the development of mathetmatics and that algebra is an Arabic word? I'm just wondering if you are ignorant by choice.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:00 pm ET)
                   
                look the math thing up again greeks were the first mathmaticians not the arabs
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 12:45 am ET)
                4 2
                Not only "we sweep last time", but "and will even more this time ".

                I'm just LOL-ing trying to imagine this illiterate moron negotiating his wages with the Arby's manager trainee.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mikehuck76 (September 07, 2011 1:57 pm ET)
                    1
                  Exactly. He has no idea of very basic English sentence structure. But, he can do a better job of negotiating his own contract than A-Rod could. A-Rod needs a union, but not the "we sweep last time and even more this time" guy. It should be hilarious. But, it is also pretty sad.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 08, 2011 2:11 am ET)
                   
                Mathematics (from Greek μάθημα (máthēma) — knowledge, study, learning) is the study of quantity, structure, space, and change.

                Rigorous arguments first appeared in Greek mathematics, most notably in Euclid's Elements. Mathematics continued to develop, for example in China in 300 BC, in India in AD 100, and in the Muslim world in AD 800, until the Renaissance, when mathematical innovations interacting with new scientific discoveries led to a rapid increase in the rate of mathematical discovery that continues to the present day.

                While the word algebra comes from the Arabic language (al-jabr, الجبر literally, restoration) and much of its methods from Arabic/Islamic mathematics, its roots can be traced to earlier traditions, which had a direct influence on Muhammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī (c. 780–850).

                The roots of algebra can be traced to the ancient Babylonians, who developed an advanced arithmetical system with which they were able to do calculations in an algorithmic fashion. The Babylonians developed formulas to calculate solutions for problems typically solved today by using linear equations, quadratic equations, and indeterminate linear equations.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 10:54 pm ET)
               
            only people afraid of the next election are obama and his backers i'm gonna love the look on some of my friends faces when they realized that the majority does rule in this country and the majority are conservitive in principle and were praying for election day to get here so we can right the wrongs of over spending
            Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 05, 2011 5:10 pm ET)
      38 3
      FOX is simply trying to economize on words...you know how frugal conservatives are.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Egbert Souse (September 06, 2011 1:35 pm ET)
        3 1
        Fox's use of edited clips to demonize someone and then panic the public is standard operating procedure at its lie-factory. Remeber Shirley Sherrod?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (September 06, 2011 3:47 pm ET)
        1 11
        "It's absolutely a war. They declared war on us. We didn’t declare war on them. They’re the ones that introduced right to work in 14 states, and went after public employee bargaining rights in both Wisconsin and Ohio. We’re fighting them across the board. They want to roll the clock back to about 1900," Teamsters President James Hoffa told ABC News.

        Hoffa, doubles down on ABC, good try on protecting him.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 4:01 pm ET)
          7 1
          I think he did a fine job protecting himself foolio.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 4:02 pm ET)
          6 1
          Fox still cut the context and made it sound like he was talking about doing violence to Tea partiers instead of voting.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 7:52 pm ET)
          6 1
          You truly just don't get it, do you?

          Ever heard of scrip? Pinkertons? Stone Mountain Coal Company? Ludlow? Until you acknowledge what "captains of industry" are capable of doing to their employees, and until you realize that people like Conservica's media and political leadership don't have any problems with such treatment or worse, your every utterance on the matter carries the same import as caprine flatulence.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (September 05, 2011 5:10 pm ET)
      32 3
      So this is what the trolls on the Huffington Post boards were MISQUOTING.

      Should have guessed Fox News was behind it all.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Louise08902 (September 05, 2011 6:30 pm ET)
        30 4
        This smear against "union thugs" and "Hoffa, the biggest thug of all" is showing up everywhere on the boards. It's almost like it was sent out to dozens of blogging minions!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:18 am ET)
          14 2
          They have to create a false parallel to normalize the actual violent rhetoric from tea party cultists they've been pandering too. Now, with this quote distorted and taken out of context, they can make the idiotic "both sides do it! derp derp derp!!!" argument.

          It's really a shame, the progressives and the tea party actually want many of the same things, but the tea party are too busy attacking many of the people trying to preserve the American middle class...like the unions, when Fox or Limbaugh commands them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by JP (September 06, 2011 1:34 pm ET)
            7 1
            I wonder how many of the trolls know that yesterdays holiday was thank's to the unions they hate so much?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by justhinking (September 06, 2011 1:49 pm ET)
              4 1
              Most trolls seem to think they are entitled to benefit from the efforts of others without having to return even just a small measure of respect or appreciation.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:06 pm ET)
                   
                sounds like liberals to me always in line for a hand out, trying to take someone elses hard earned money because there to lazy to work
                Report Abuse
            • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:05 pm ET)
                 
              didn't get a holiday that would have cost me money and if the union did well every day's a holiday for them anyhow
              Report Abuse
          • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:03 pm ET)
               
            union is outdated and obsolete there only 7% percent of the work force at this point and like i've said before the laziest over paid workers on the job site any day of the year
            Report Abuse
        • Author by rightwing71 (September 06, 2011 10:20 am ET)
             
          I don't know about you, but I'm ready to March with Hoffa and perform a complete cleansing of Washington.

          The army must fight and if they bring a knife, we'll bring a gun.

          We have to stop these people in Washington NOW!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 5:14 pm ET)
      26 3
      Unbelievably dishonest even for FOX
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 5:24 pm ET)
        31 3
        Agreed. This is low even for Faux. This is Breitbart/Okeefe/World Net Daily type stuff right here. Usually Faux stays at least one step more classy than the gutter types, but not anymore. They serve an ideological agenda and nothing else. Very sad for our democracy.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DennisKQV (September 05, 2011 5:16 pm ET)
         
      So, your news is that the 3:04 segment played the full speech and made it clear Hoffa was talking about November?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 5:22 pm ET)
      29 3
      Faux lies... Faux lies... Faux lies... Faux lies... Faux lies...

      This is overtly dishonest Breitbart territory... Faux is officially in the gutter with the deceptive hyper-partisan O'Keefe/Breitbart/Loesch types.

      "Fair and Balanced" is the most Orwellian phrase disseminated currently in America. Yikes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DennisKQV (September 05, 2011 5:25 pm ET)
         
      Now the third video is up and I see they edited the reference to the election out again.

      But, at least the commentary that went with the third clip made it clear the comments were in reference to the elections.

      I agree - if Fox had just kept the focus on the profanity and ignored the "take them out" references it would have been a much better report.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 5:29 pm ET)
      41 4
      I notice these hypocrites weren't too concerned when Sharon Angle used the "take them out" term against democrats... especially hypocritical when she said this after the "Second amendment remedies" debacle she tried so hard to get people to forget.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Black_Oblivion (September 05, 2011 6:10 pm ET)
           
        Imagine how long it would take for them to even renounce Rush Limbaugh's words. If they want to pretend like they care about violent words, they should start calling out their colleagues because the list is very long.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hoopvillain (September 05, 2011 7:28 pm ET)
        21 2
        The reason Sharon Angle's comments didnt get covered the same is becaus eof the “Faux Rules of Engagement”. See below:

        There are three types or levels of politician according to the "faux rules of engagement". The first is the teatard looney who faux defends no matter because they are "one of them". The second level is for "moderate" repubtards whom they will defend most of the time, but not always, Romney or Huntsman fit in this category. The third is reserved for Democrats and all enemies of faux and they attack them no matter what they say or do. This third level gets attacked even if they support a repubtard policy. These rules of engagement are used to guide faux bots in their severity of attack and how and when they attack. The first level never gets criticized, the second level get s criticized on occasion, but not with the same ferociousness reserved for the third level. The third level is targeted with the most vicious severity of attack.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Tiredog (September 06, 2011 12:53 am ET)
        10 2
        Didn't Angle also use the map with the targets on it?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:08 am ET)
        19 3
        "Second amendment remedies"


        That's what I thought of first. there's no metaphorical context for that ( as many times I as I gave wingnuts a chance to explain it), but they're going all swoony over this statement, that includes a clear context.

        The right wing has just given up completely on any honest arguments.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:28 am ET)
          11 2
          They are ideologically bankrupt. All they have left is tricks, and lies, and "gotchas". If they don't have a gotcha, they'll take things out of context and fabricate one.

          The idea of unions returning has been making inroads among the working poor and lower middle class. It is of the utmost importance for the multinational corporations and their Fox news toadies to squash the idea of worker security and rights with as heavy a hand as possible.

          This is one such example.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:08 pm ET)
               
            been poor my whole life and i'll never join a union just so i can slack off and get paid more,thats dishonesty and i like to earn my money
            Report Abuse
      • Author by kamrom (September 06, 2011 4:28 am ET)
        10 2
        The rightwing has for some time been a caricature of itself. Remember, this is the same group that both a) demanded zero government involvement in healthcare and b) had a special session to try and control Terri Schiavo's health, trying to take that control away on purpose.

        What do I mean, "on purpose?" This. It just goes to show, the rightwing has no ideology. its like.. an anti-ology, except nowhere near as clever.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mathazar (September 05, 2011 5:30 pm ET)
      15 6
      I hate to admit it, but these liars are making me wish we really did have some thugs on our side. Of course, we do have the NHL players.
      Report Abuse
              • Author by HeeNow (September 05, 2011 6:33 pm ET)
                4 44
                Proof that even lemmings need a leader.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 6:38 pm ET)
                  27 5
                  Hee

                  YOU are proof that human beings can type without the benifit of a brain. Tell the truth. You even disgust yourself dont you?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:11 am ET)
                    15 3
                    Proof that even lemmings need a leader.


                    I think HeeHaw was referring to his trainers at Faux News.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 6:44 pm ET)
                  20 5
                  Who yelled "fire"

                  Just hope that someday you won't find horrible deaths amusing, heenow.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 7:34 pm ET)
                  14 2
                  I got your hee hanging dipsh!t. I think the literal take on Mr Hoffa's statement was more interesting anyway. I was kind of let down to find out it wasn't zero hour....yet. Muahahahahahahah thunder is just noisy but lightning means business.
                  Report Abuse
                    • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 9:26 pm ET)
                      14 2
                      All my loves from childhood, my Father was UAW and later a teamster, and my from-memory recall about why unions had to be tough is that the 'company men' in many industries were extremely violent and dangerous to your health if you tried to organize. I am so amazed to hear the sell outs who want the unions busted. But in real life, I have copper- bosses for predecessors as well, bastards. I am glad that Hoffa has a little spine and salt to boot. If salt loses its savor isn't it only worth throwing out to be trampled under foot? Thanks for the songs, Joan Baez and Pete Seeger are heroes of mine. Woody as well, but his mental state in later years hits too close to home. And it is none of my business, but you used to be a nun? ie: 'holy orders' cool anyhow, thanks.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 9:41 pm ET)
                      15 2
                      Thanks for those Mary. From a union man of more than thirty years
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 10:33 pm ET)
                        13 3
                        Back at ya both. They still bring goose bumps.

                        Don't have a union background, but those songs came out of a real passion for justice for the common man and people who sacrificed to make things better for everyone, so you'd have to have a pretty cold heart not to be moved by 'em.

                        hee, I still consider myself under vows but our Order was nondenominational & I wasn't a nun. We started these:
                        http://raphaelhouse.com/
                        http://www.raphaelhouse.org/
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 10:46 pm ET)
                          12 2
                          Very humbling actually, as a Catholic I only ever heard 'holy orders' in the context of Priests and Nuns. Thanks for the git-back.
                          Report Abuse
                • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:33 am ET)
                  10 2
                  HeeNow wrote:
                  Proof that even lemmings need a leader.


                  Very True HeeNow, but you're a little late. Fox news has been telling people what to think for a long time now. This out of context quote is one perfect example, and I'm glad it upsets you, HeeNow that Fox is leading it's people around like lemmings and stirring up outrage with quotes deliberately taken out of context.

                  The Fox has been leading those lemmings around for some time, today they took a leap off the cliffs of context and drown in a sea of lies.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 10:17 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Right, because, if you want a group who doesn't think, it certainly wouldn't be the group whose standard-bearer is a guy whose fans call themselves "ditto-heads."

                  Don't your legs get sore marching in lockstep like that all the time?
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by BobsYourUncle (September 07, 2011 12:45 am ET)
                2  
                Billy Bragg 'power in a union'
                Report Abuse
      • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:10 pm ET)
           
        the entire left wing is nothing but thugs at this point or haven't you been paying attention
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 5:39 pm ET)
      27 4
      If the president doesn't condemn then he is sanctioning violence against fellow Americans by silence period


      Another thing, I've noticed that a lot of teabaggers, if not all of them, tend to ramble on trying to prove their point and then end by repeating their basic false premise and end with the word "Period"

      They end their argument with the word "period" because it sounds good and powerful, they know they're lying.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by floridamom5 (September 05, 2011 5:47 pm ET)
           
        Don't you think that your conversation here is far worse than ending a comment with - Period?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (September 05, 2011 6:07 pm ET)
        22 3
        Yes, they are lying. Period. End of story. Finis. Redundant.

        Randy
        Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (September 05, 2011 9:16 pm ET)
        8 1
        F-r-e-d--G--S-a-n-f-o-r-d period
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:13 am ET)
        13 1
        They also like " Case closed!" , following ridiculously fallacious arguments. It works on the authoritarian brain.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 5:40 pm ET)
      27 4
      If there was ever a case for the Fairness Doctrine this would be a nice start.

      This is getting f-ing scary.

      The deception and hyper-partisanship is out of control.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 05, 2011 9:43 pm ET)
        3 27
        f there was ever a case for the Fairness Doctrine this would be a nice start.

        Another un-read Memo eh booty?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 10:07 pm ET)
          23 2
          And yet FOXPAC will still argue that the Obama administration is the most Radical Socialist, Communist president in American history.

          Thanks for proving that FOXPAC teabagger corporate fascism is on the rise.

          Teabaggers are getting more and more of what they want from Obama and they do nothing but whine about how he's walking all over American liberties.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 10:23 pm ET)
            11 1
            Well said Thomas.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:22 am ET)
            14 1
            I'm not even sure what point Tbonehead was trying to make. He seems to be accidentally backing you up, and implying that you missed something because you're smarter than he is.

            Better trolls, please.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 1:37 pm ET)
               
            obama hasn't done anything for the people since he's been in office and little hoffa's just scared he's losing his union to the tea party. There are definitly more liberals on this sight then republicans all you have to do is look for where the name calling is coming from.the liberal agenda is over in a year or so and most of what they think they have accomplished will be repealed. thank you tea party for your cival demonstations that are in contrast to liberal mobs screaming for people's death just because we don't agree.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by cripto9t709 (September 06, 2011 1:54 pm ET)
          2 1
          That one kind of back fired, didn't it.

          Think before you post slick.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 06, 2011 8:42 pm ET)
              6
            Sorry ladies...calling for a "case" for the Fairness Doctrine when that doctrine has been thankfully shelved...

            There is no more Fairness Doctrine. You'll have to win the debate on your own accord now.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 9:09 pm ET)
              5  
              The only thing left to debate is why evolution has passed you by,I suppose typing anything relevant is as difficult for knuckle draggers as is walking upright.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 12:58 am ET)
                3  
                D.Boned Chicken's logic here is goofy for an average wingnut. It's even weak for him, one of the dopier wingnuts.

                To be consistent, he'd have to say that no case could be made in support of anything that isn't currently law, or being considered for legislation.

                He couldn't even come up with a complete sentence to support his argument.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Chameo (September 07, 2011 3:06 am ET)
              3  
              Funny you should bring up winning debates in a discussion about the Fairness Doctrine, since debates actually HAVE a fairness doctrine, in that they require that both sides get equal time to air their arguments.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 10:38 am ET)
                2  
                Tidy little insight. The problem is, the wingnuts think what happens on Fox "news" is debate. Remember when that timid little Colmes guy got to chime in once or twice an hour on HANNITY & colmes ?

                That was too much "fairness" for them, they had to get rid of that guy.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Chameo (September 07, 2011 10:44 am ET)
                  3  
                  In their minds, the guy that yells the loudest wins the debate, since the object of any debate is to make sure you're POV is heard and no one else's counts. I always figured Colmes' job description was titled "liberal punching bag".
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by mathazar (September 05, 2011 5:42 pm ET)
      25 2
      Wow, reading it again, they cut out half the sentence !
      That's not just out of context, that's flat out lying.
      Fox did the same thng to Biden when Joe repeated McCain's comment about the "fundamentals of the ecconomy being sound".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phredicles (September 05, 2011 9:10 pm ET)
        14 1
        It's funny, you'd think if their political philosophy were so great, they wouldn't need to lie all the time to convince people of it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:46 am ET)
        7 1
        Not only that, but any idiot who isn't tuning into Fox to be told what to think, will use the language skills they learned as a small child before kindergarten, and understand he just said all this in regards to voting. It doesn't even make sense the way they're interpreted it unless you truncate the quote down to a few key words that don't form a complete sentence.

        Teabaggers and Fox viewers have now been reduced to a pre-preschool political mentality. They are now completely incapable of basic comprehension, only gut reaction if Fox can get away with this kind of attack now.

        Don't you teabagger chumps get it? Fox had to create a negative talking point without context for you to get outraged at because they don't think you're smart enough to draw your own conclusion from Hoffa's speech.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Chameo (September 05, 2011 5:44 pm ET)
      31 4
      Seriously? After 3 years of listening to the TEA party chanting that they'll take "their" country back, references to 2nd amendment remedies, armed marches, calls to break windows and actual physical violence, none of which had to be taken out of context to show the actual calls for violent revolution, they're going with THIS? Honestly?

      Guess they've never heard the expression "Take out the garbage", huh?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by leatherhelmet (September 05, 2011 6:50 pm ET)
        1 43
        If they bring a knive to a fight, we bring a gun.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 7:02 pm ET)
          27 6
          leather

          You are a liar a punk and a coward. Labor isnt bringing any knives and talk about election victories is NOT talking about knives or guns. Besides we both know if there were real knives or guns a coward like you would snivel to your mother and hide under your bed
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MiniTru (September 05, 2011 7:02 pm ET)
          19 2
          And if you ever came armed for a battle of wits, it would be the first time ever.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MiniTru (September 05, 2011 7:03 pm ET)
            22 3
            And, leatherbutt, what's a "knive"?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 7:37 pm ET)
              19 1
              That's what the nursing home won't let him use at mealtime any more.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 9:21 pm ET)
                13 1
                No, that's not a knive. That's a spon.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 9:28 pm ET)
                  13 1
                  can he hurt himself with it?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 9:33 pm ET)
                    16 1
                    Depends on if he's played knivey sponny before.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:49 am ET)
                      10 1
                      Just don't give leatherhelmet a spork! He'll probably hurt himself flying into a rage about how it's a socialist plot by George Soros to undermine western utensil values and promote some kind of multicultural utensil conspiracy.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 9:25 am ET)
                        9 1
                        Why can I see a spork on Glenns chalkboard when you say that.....right next to Saul Alinsky or Frances Fox Piven?
                        Report Abuse
        • Author by hoopvillain (September 05, 2011 7:30 pm ET)
          17 1
          Good thing it isn't a debate, because there you would need a brain and you would have to stay home with the rest of your teatard/repubtard friends.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Chameo (September 05, 2011 7:38 pm ET)
          16 1
          You should take the helmet off when it rains. Water shrinks the leather and it constricts your brain, leaving you to make nonsensical connections between common cliches and actual calls for vandalism and violence.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by phlcstgan (September 05, 2011 8:44 pm ET)
          16 1
          Oh no! The troll quoted a movie! He's on to us!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:29 am ET)
            15 1
            I think he's quoting something from the teabaggers hit parade. The president made a remark about bringing a gun to a knife ( or "knive") fight, in a clear reference to debate.

            Right wing simpletons have been convinced that it was comparable to blatant, concrete calls to violence, like " Second amendment remedies".

            If you're not familiar with the quote, don't feel bad, be proud. It means you're not an idiot who can be confused by metaphors.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 11:15 am ET)
            4 1
            No, he misquoted a movie. In addition he kinda stepped on a frequent Teabangical insult...namely anything having to do with Chicago is evil.

            The complete quote is:
            "He pulls a knife; you pull a gun. They send one yours to the hospital; you send one of theirs to the morgue. That is the Chicago way."

            The troll is saying that he admires the Chicago way. What's the matter, did the Teabangicals make you surrender your tri-cornered, tinfoil hat and that is why you are wearing a leather helmet?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by blk-in-alabam (September 05, 2011 9:19 pm ET)
          13 1
          Yep teabsggers brought Ak's,and Glocks,,,,,,bluffing,,,Many of those teabagger guns are at the pawn shop today
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete x tp (September 05, 2011 9:46 pm ET)
          13 1
          If "they" bring a knife to a fight I call the fight off because virtually nothing is worth anyone getting killed.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 11:08 am ET)
          7 1
          What's a knive and how is helpful in a fight? BTW-Lots of liberals own guns. We don't feel a need to intimidate others with them or fondle/sleep with them. Don't think that a simple threat is going to intimidate us.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by floridamom5 (September 05, 2011 5:46 pm ET)
         
      What I really wish I could see is all forms of media including Media Matters telling the truth. That Hoffa story is just an example. Mr. Hoffa wants a war. Why is it OK for him to declare war on Tea Party Congressman and Republicans but if the Tea Party has a rally, somehow they are bad guys? I don't see any Tea Party person speaking with the same violent rhetoric that Hoffa uses. And, I don't think it is a good idea for a man who wants to stay President to associate himself with only a small portion of the workforce of the American people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (September 05, 2011 6:05 pm ET)
      19 1
      wolf kotenberg posted on another thread that Ailes on cared about ratings.

      This is what has become of jounalism, thanks to News Corp. All their shows are not about substance it is about hype. Commentators are celebrities. Hannity thinks he a rock star, Megyn Kelly posts provovative pictures of herself on the internet. The women routinely show a bit too much leg and cleavage. The men are actors.

      Further, they outright lie, or omit things that deceive. Look here, don't look there. Look at the pretty package delivering the message - don't try to learn the truth. Just trust us - we will keep you entertained
      Report Abuse
      • Author by canaanxing9025 (September 05, 2011 6:08 pm ET)
        14 1
        that would be only cared about ratings.

        Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian must be jealous.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 6:12 pm ET)
        21 1
        ^^Truer words have never been spoken!^^

        And on Labor Day for the love of pete!!!

        Can you turn off the deception for one day Faux?? Can you honor the hard-working people of this nation for one day?? Guess not. Instead labor gets deceptive editing and a spit in the eye.

        I am seriously disturbed over this. I hope MMFA doesn't just let this go. There needs to be more attention brought to overt dishonesty. There is the usual misinformation and then things like this come along where they are actually trying actively to be biased and deceptive, and we cannot allow for it in a healthy democracy!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 6:45 pm ET)
          17  
          Can you turn off the deception for one day Faux??


          You mean, go off the air?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:54 am ET)
            7 1
            They really can't. The 24 hour cable and radio network echo chambers are how they create and keep the drones buzzing around the hive. They don't have ideas, so they need to keep feeding a constant flow of attacks and misinformation to the base.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by JP (September 06, 2011 1:58 pm ET)
        3  
        And every one of them are UNION members!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Black_Oblivion (September 05, 2011 6:07 pm ET)
         
      They are so tired of the violence-inciting quotes of right wingers actually being in context when people call them on it, that they have to fabricate quotes from libs to try and counter it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfvl (September 05, 2011 6:11 pm ET)
      5 44
      Republicans should lighten up. Everybody knows the real intent of hoffa's words. Geez, it's not like he said that he was 'targeting' anyone.

      Besides, I'm sure the president will quickly ask the unions to turn down the rhetoric too!

      Speaking truth to progressivism/liberalism with a shout out to all my union homies that got hired last month from all the new jobs the administration saved and/or created last month! Celebrating biden's summer of recovery II!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (September 05, 2011 6:23 pm ET)
        31 2
        Geez, it's not like he said that he was 'targeting' anyone.


        Or mentioned it in reference to "second amendment remedies". They're Union guys, geeze. What do Union guys take out? Around here, they take out the garbage on sanitation trucks. That sounds about right to me.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 7:24 pm ET)
          18 1
          Don't pay any mind to mmfvl, it's obvious FOXPAC got caught in another undeniable lie and mmfvl just wants to deflect away from that.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (September 05, 2011 6:24 pm ET)
        20 2
        That which we call a ProudConservative...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 6:34 pm ET)
        18 8
        MMMoron

        We know. You LOVE to lie almost as much as you LOVE to be lied to so of COURSE you would run in here and appologize for this outright LIE. Even though it IS a lie and the word targetted was about targetted to lose elections dishonest morons like YOU STILL pretend it is rhetoric that should be toned down. You are a disgusting human being MMM. Actually last monty my corporation hired a bunch of new union members I am sure they thank you.

        You should STOP celebrating your stupidity and your astonishing level of brainwashing. It is pathetic not something to be proud of
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MickD (September 06, 2011 3:56 am ET)
          6 10
          Dude, just insulting people is not a debate.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kabniel (September 06, 2011 4:12 am ET)
            11 5
            Dude

            I dont CARE what you think. His post was not meant for any sort of debate it was a pure troll provocation post. You deal with trolls anyway you want I assure you I will do exactly that and you seriously have nothing to say about it. If you dont like my posts feel free to ignore them. I wonder why you give me grief though and never say anything to the disgusting insulting posts by the rightwingnut trolls
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MickD (September 06, 2011 11:52 am ET)
              4 7
              I just think this name calling gets us nowhere. I'm all for insulting the context of the message, or calling out a troll, but this constant, back-and-forth, questioning of intelligence through playground language is tiresome. Thanks for not caring.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jonimacaroni1 (September 06, 2011 12:18 pm ET)
                4 4
                It's not "kabniel's" fault that you thought he was trying to engage in a debate with the trolls when he replies to them. He's not deigning to try to interact with them. Because they're trolls.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 6:35 pm ET)
        22 2
        Yep! Obama should tell unions and Mr. Hoffa, Jr to tone down that rhetoric of voting people out!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mmfvl (September 05, 2011 9:31 pm ET)
          1 25
          Remember how that was a bad thing before......you know dupniked..
          Report Abuse
          • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 9:45 pm ET)
            13 1
            Um, what?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:36 am ET)
              19 2
              Your confusion is a badge of honor, with regards to muffie's gibberish. If her posts made sense to you, that would be a reason to worry.

              Sheriff Dupnik spoke out against violent rhetoric from the right wing media when a Democratic politician was shot by a right wing nutbag.

              Hoffa makes a very clear remark about voting that includes the figurative phrase "take them out".

              In muffie's tiny reptilian brain, these are the same thing. I only understand because I study the wingnuts in the wild.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 11:34 am ET)
                6 1
                "I study the wingnuts in the wild."

                Okay, are you Marlin Perkins safe up in the heli or are you Jim who is on the ground staring the Tealibangicals in the face?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 3:38 pm ET)
                  4 2
                  OH, I live and work among them, I'm Jim. I lure them with little American flags and shiny objects, and stun them with tranquilizer darts of reality.

                  And while they may come off as savage predators as anonymous web posters, they're much more timid and docile when face to face.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:03 am ET)
                  2  
                  Although they will defend themselves with the anonymous thumbs down. Ha!
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 11:31 am ET)
            3  
            Hey typo, want to try that again in English?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 6:36 pm ET)
        19 2
        Thanks, wise guy. Up next: why the unions should "turn down their rhetoric"? from mmfvl, 'cause it's just so d*mn impolite to talk about being screwed.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mmfvl (September 05, 2011 6:50 pm ET)
          1 33
          Mary!?!,

          Wash your fingertips out with soap, right now!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 6:54 pm ET)
            18 2
            MMMoron

            Try to purchase a functional cerebral cortex as soon as possible. You are just sad
            Report Abuse
          • Author by phlcstgan (September 05, 2011 8:50 pm ET)
            14  
            Oh, did we offend your delicate wittle moral sensibilities in response to your post gloating about people losing their jobs?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by hoopvillain (September 05, 2011 7:32 pm ET)
        9  
        mmfvl,
        Isnt it wonderful that intelligence is require to post here?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jonimacaroni1 (September 06, 2011 12:37 am ET)
        8  
        There's a huge difference between using the word "targeting" and putting a gun scope target over Democrat's Congressional districts.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 5:59 am ET)
        3  
        Besides, I'm sure the president will quickly ask the unions to turn down the rhetoric too!


        Sadly, this is true. Even though there was nothing violent or inappropriate in the speech, president Obama may predictably cave to fears of media pressure and do the bidding of the Fox and GOP lie machine. Then about two seconds later they will be back to attacking him for his radical agenda, and his extreme partisanship, or for being a democrat on a sunny day. It doesn't even matter anymore really, they'll just make up something.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cripto9t709 (September 06, 2011 4:01 pm ET)
        2  
        you stupid mmfvl
        Report Abuse
    • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 6:29 pm ET)
      15 2
      "There is no God." --Psalm 14:1, NIV
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 12:34 am ET)
        4  
        Ephesians 4:17 says, "And the dwarf catcher did say unto Abraham, 'Dwarves!!! Too many dwaGRAAAAHHHH!'" and the next two verses are just God telling them to "Get him!" If this comic has taught me anything, it's that Bible verses say whatever the hell I want (Ecclesiastes 1:17).
        (Source)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (September 05, 2011 6:50 pm ET)
      18 1
      Several years ago George Allen described his election strategy against liberals as "knock their soft teeth down their whining throats!"

      To my knowledge, no took him literally. As classless and tasteless as his remark was, it was understood to be figurative.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (September 05, 2011 6:52 pm ET)
      14  
      give America back to America where we belong!


      This sounds familiar. Seems like I remember some people screaming something about "taking America back" the past couple of years. Now who could that have been?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (September 05, 2011 6:56 pm ET)
      15 1
      Fox news has a problem.An increasing number of their audience is starting to agree with Mr.Hoffa.........The Information age is both a friend,and an enemy to antique propaganda methods of the Third Reich used by fox news......The friend stage is coming to an end.It is now entering the enemy stage,because everybody knows...........Everything fox news attacks turns in an informercial for,Because it is now just too easy to check,and verify anywhere,anytime........When fox news started their game there were not millions,and millions of smart phones as today.It only takes a few numbers,and letters dialed on a phone to prove fox lies anywhere,anytime...........As Rush Limbaugh would say fox news"shot their wad" summer 2010.And they used ed medicine to do that
      Report Abuse
    • Author by angels4light (September 05, 2011 6:58 pm ET)
      9 6
      To be fair, the language is pretty suggestive to the crowd that uses similar language regularly and is always looking for an excuse to claim that both sides do it.

      On the other hand, for them to freak out over that language when they don't over those in their camp using the same language is blatant hypocrisy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 7:04 pm ET)
        19  
        No it isnt. Talking about taking them out of office by voting is in no way suggestive. They are lying
        Report Abuse
        • Author by GreenLantern (September 05, 2011 8:20 pm ET)
          19  
          I agree, this is a specific lie, put on the air for a specific purpose, pounded OVER and OVER again to give a bunch of weak minded hate-wingers ammunition for their "you're side doose it to" (misspelled on purpose....) argument. When listening to the entire thing, there is no mistaking what he meant!

          On another thread I used the Barney Frank and that hateful Nazi woman attack as an example of what they are doing. 5 seconds out of a 2 minute hateful rant that was so ugly and disgusting that she deserved what she got from Barney, but ALL the news outlets ONLY showed 5 seconds of her rant BUT ALL of Barneys retort. She deserved it but they did it to make Mr Frank look bad. It is despicable and should be called out EVERY TIME!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by liberal christian (September 05, 2011 7:09 pm ET)
         
      "If the Congress keeps going in the direction it is going, we might have to excercise our 2nd Amendment rights" Sharon Angle Tea Party Candidate
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley_fpt (September 05, 2011 7:11 pm ET)
      20  
      Wasn't Sarah Palin's explanation for "don't retreat, reload," that she meant for people to go vote and Fox said of course..it was obvious? lol But Hoffa actually said "vote" and they're throwing a hissyfit? Good lord. I hope this gets some attention on some real news shows.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (September 05, 2011 7:20 pm ET)
      20  
      Just watched the ABC Network news and it was shown, out of context.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 7:29 pm ET)
        15  
        Really? Faux distortions are now being spread by network news... Ugh.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (September 05, 2011 7:43 pm ET)
        12  
        ABC news has always been fox news lite.They hired George Will before fox news existed,and hired him.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by SteevK (September 07, 2011 3:53 pm ET)
             
          You can say that again - loudly.

          I remember seeing Mark Halperen on O'Reilly's show. He promised Bill that he would "move ABC News to the right, make it more conservative"

          Everyone remembers Gibson & Steph spending the first 45 mins of that last debate openly attacking Obama on everything from Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, flag pins, even clipped quotes from himself & Michelle. BUT, did you know that Steph was on Hannity's radio show, being fed those questions - pretty much exactly as he repeated them to Obama?

          Hannity said that nobody was going to ask him about... (the usual Hannity littany) when George asked him to repeat it, so he could write it down - and then he threw out the same allegations/smears in the same order Hannity dictated them, in the debate!

          Also, in an earlier debate, Gibson, after asking the candidates about their plans for an Iraq pullout, showed a little video clip ("news" release from the Bush WH?) and proceeded to ARGUE with them - that they'd be walking away from victory if they pulled out, after The Surge and all...! AND, Gibson also argued with Obama on recinding the Bush tax cuts - contending that it would mean bigger defecits (?!?)

          That's why I busted out laughing when Palin accused Gibson of liberal bias, for asking her about the Bush Doctrine! What a gotcha!

          If you look at most panels on This Week, they are - like just about EVERY other Sunday news/talk show - heavily weighted toward the right.

          Liberal media my A$$!
          ..
          Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (September 05, 2011 7:20 pm ET)
      11  
      Just watched the ABC Network news and it was shown, out of context.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by slowtyper (September 05, 2011 9:56 pm ET)
        12 1
        so i hope you went on their site and called them out on their error..i did..and it's really the only way to fight these SOB's(to coin a phrase..)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by slowtyper (September 05, 2011 10:37 pm ET)
          11 1
          CNN at least played the Hoffa clip in context and then john king spewed out some faux-like rhetoric when he "interviewed Hoffa..
          Report Abuse
    • Author by IndependentFTW (September 05, 2011 7:24 pm ET)
         
      Hoffa's vagueness left room for interpretation. We know that he meant "take them out of office", but he phrased it in a way that also has been used in reference to killing someone. He should not have said "take them out", PLAIN and SIMPLE.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hoopvillain (September 05, 2011 7:25 pm ET)
      18 11
      Don't forget the faux nooze mantra:
      We distort and you remain misinformed"
      Oh yea and also, Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox Lies! Fox lies! Fox lies! Fox lies!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hoopvillain (September 05, 2011 7:26 pm ET)
        14 9
        Oh yea, and if you dont like all the "Fox lies!" tough!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by GreenLantern (September 05, 2011 8:21 pm ET)
          6 14
          I thumbs down that because it is really not necessary and just takes up space. Most people her offer more substance......
          Just sayin'.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 8:27 pm ET)
            10 6
            Agreed. Repeating "Clouds are visible masses of suspended water droplets" over and over again isn't really conducive to a discussion even if it is factual. We already know that this network lies when it's easier to tell the truth. :)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kathy5 (September 06, 2011 1:09 pm ET)
              6 1
              "We already know that his network (Fox) lies when it's easier to tell then truth" - that is NOT correct. It's not that it's easier to tell the truth - it's all part of their plan to destroy the left in this country. Fact is, they don't give a hoot or a holler what the TRUTH is, that's not their angle.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by hoopvillain (September 05, 2011 8:47 pm ET)
            14 4
            It is necesary to make the point. Besides that bar on the right, it helps you scroll down, Just sayin'.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jonimacaroni1 (September 06, 2011 12:39 am ET)
              9 8
              No, it's not necessary to make the point, and it actually is a pretty weak way to make a point. Mindless repetition of "Fox lies!" has virtually no value.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by hoopvillain (September 06, 2011 1:13 pm ET)
                6 5
                By the looks of the thumbs vs thumbs down, more agree with me than your position. I will continue much to your consternation.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jonimacaroni1 (September 06, 2011 4:07 pm ET)
                  1 5
                  I don't care what the thumbs say. It doesn't change the fact that it's not necessary to make any point. Mindless repetition has no value, just like treating trolls like they're trying to debate has no value.

                  Most people here offer more substance than your posts that simply repeat "Fox Lies!" do.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by hoopvillain (September 06, 2011 4:30 pm ET)
                    3  
                    "Most people here offer more substance than your posts that simply repeat "Fox Lies!" do." Most people here just hurl insults at those from the right. I find my posts far more entertaining than the insults from the left towards the right. These posts have their purpose. Maybe it is therapeutic.
                    Not true, I offer insightful posts and my "Fox Lies!" posts. I find your posts occasionally illuminating, but that doesnt change my opinion or my plans. You are entitled to your opinion. You miss the point entirely and maybe that is because of your intellectual abilities.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by GreenLantern (September 06, 2011 7:56 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Thanks, it is just simply my opinion.
                      Please post whatever you want. If I get some thumbs down for expressing my opinion, that is just what happens. Just like if you get thumbs down for expressing your opinion in that way should also be expected.
                      I have had my say and the catharsis that comes with it and please always feel free to express what you want here in any way you want to.
                      I understand that when someone posts here they are not looking for all approval all the time and I respect your stand, even if I don't care for the way you express it! :)
                      Report Abuse
      • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 07, 2011 1:34 pm ET)
           
        Poopvillian spreading more BS? PoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianvPoopvillianPoopvillianvvPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianvPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianPoopvillianvPoopvillian
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ilovedoughnuts (September 05, 2011 7:28 pm ET)
      8 46
      Pathetic. So the below "full context" version where he calls Republicans "son of a bitches" is OK with you people AND Obama. Pathetic.

      HOFFA: Everybody here's got to vote. If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let's take this son of a bitches out and give America back to America where we belong! Thank you very much!

      Then MMfA admits FOX aired the full context in other FOX segments: "But fuller context included in other Fox segments makes clear that Hoffa wasn't calling for violence but was actually urging the crowd to vote out Republican members of Congress."

      How desperate is MMfA in their efforts to badmouth the only fair and balanced news outlet in America? Think about it. This is really low class even for MMfA from top to bottom. The descriptive word is pathetic. Period.

      BTW, keep this in mind when MMfA edits their stuff - and often misrepresents their headlines as well.

      2BTW, really folks. Why stoop to such low levels? "son of a bitches"?

      3BTW, and how many times has Obama got up on his pulpit giving BS speeches about how we "must come together" and "work together" and "not be so partisan" and blah, blah, blah. It's no wonder his approval ratings are down in the 40's - nobody believes a word he says anymore. Including millions of liberals!

      4BTW, his overall approval is much better then his economic approval policies. He's down in the 20's in this category - and rightfully so. We'd have been SO much better off if he'd done NOTHING since the day he was sworn in. If he'd just had taken a permanent vacation instead of the ones he takes every couple months. Well, you people bought his BS so you gotta live with it just as I do. Only a little over a year left of his madness and we'll have someone with more experience in the WH (by more experience I mean ANY experience. BHO hasn't even run a lemonade stand. He's the most inexperienced person in any room he's in - and this is the TRUTH!) Not only this, the man isn't even bright enough to hire a few people that have some experience running a company. His Czars and Cabinet are basically all academia types or career politicians. Even RR and GWB were smart enough to have experienced people around them to offer ideas and recommendations. And you people think these two presidents were really stupid while BHO is a genius. If his policies weren't effecting millions of unemployed people it would be funny.



      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 7:31 pm ET)
        31 4
        This is about Hoffa, not Obama. Fox News is spreading false information. Whether you like it or not, this "fair and balanced" network is lying. Hoffa was not calling for violence.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 7:46 pm ET)
          25 4
          But doughnut lover has an Obama obsession. He just can't quit the man.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mjlilgui (September 05, 2011 8:19 pm ET)
            19 2
            I have a feeling if you knocked a hole in the side of his head, paragraphs upon paragraphs of talking points would just pour out like sand. There doesn't seem to be room for anything else.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 6:33 am ET)
              12 1
              I can't believe ilovedoughnuts talking point diarrhea actually included this:

              3BTW, and how many times has Obama got up on his pulpit giving BS speeches about how we "must come together" and "work together" and "not be so partisan" and blah, blah, blah.


              Just a few days after President Obama once AGAIN caved instantly to republican pressure and re-scheduled his jobs speech. A few short weeks after caving in to republican demands on the Tea Party debt ceiling fiasco when he could have enacted 14th amendment provisions.

              At this point there's almost nothing that happens in Washington without the republicans' absolute refusal to take anything less then their initial demands, and President Obama caving instantly and completely to meet them 9/10ths of the way.

              Yet they STILL push this talking point? I suppose after this post and all the criticisms of the President, he'll just call me an Obama worshiper anyway. Reality doesn't matter to these sheep.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (September 06, 2011 12:44 am ET)
          13  
          Blaze posters are calling for violence against Hoffa and unions. You know...Soros, MediaMatters.. nuff said
          Report Abuse
          • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 1:05 am ET)
            9  
            Of course they are. Hoffa makes a speech about voting using rather colorful (though by no means unusual) language, and there are those on the right calling for violence.

            It's to be expected. :P
            Report Abuse
        • Author by EDDIE YORK (September 07, 2011 1:40 pm ET)
             
          yes he was and Obama did not help at all
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bootyprof (September 05, 2011 7:42 pm ET)
        24 1
        Can you provide examples of when MMFA deceptively "edits their stuff"?? We know right-wingers like Breitbart and O'keefe play those dishonest games, but do you have proof that MMFA is also dishonest??

        I know what Faux says sounds good and "truthful" to your right-wing ears but THIS IS OVERT DISHONESTY and blatant misinformation and has no place in a healthy democracy! You should be applauding MMFA for providing accuracy and transparency!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:44 am ET)
          17 1
          Can you provide examples of when MMFA deceptively "edits their stuff"?


          Good luck with that, bootyprof. Donutluvver is possibly the stupidest, most ineffective wingnut who posts here ( and that's a tough title to claim).

          He regularly ( under several failed screen names so far) repeats Fox talking points, as well as making outlandish claims about other posters ( making up things they've said, insisting that he's proved them liars or won arguments).

          When asked to back any of it up, he usually has to take a nap, or walk his dogs, or shoe his horses. He seems to be the prime Fox demo, elderly, confused, dishonest and cowardly.

          But check back in a day or two, he also has a habit of creeping back just before comments close to tell everybody that he's not an idiot, and do a victory dance.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ilovedoughnuts (September 06, 2011 5:40 am ET)
            2 19
            "He regularly ( under several failed screen names so far) repeats Fox talking points, as well as making outlandish claims about other posters ( making up things they've said, insisting that he's proved them liars or won arguments).

            When asked to back any of it up, he usually has to take a nap, or walk his dogs, or shoe his horses. He seems to be the prime Fox demo, elderly, confused, dishonest and cowardly."

            I see you're still suffering from narcissism AK. Once Obamacare is fully implemented you need to check yourself into a mental hospital to get some help with this. Until then, recommend you stop with your whiny adolescent comments about me. Us normal people can se right through your condescending elitist posts.

            BTW, do you use handkerchiefs or tissues to wipe the crybaby tears from your mug? Poor poor Andy - he's always getting picked on. I can imagine you laying on the floor kicking your heals while wailing "Make ILD stop Mommy! It's not fair that he dishes crap back at me!". Really AK, you are just pathetic.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by CoolSlaw (September 06, 2011 6:42 am ET)
              18 2
              When I saw your reply here, ilovedoughnuts, I thought maybe you were responding to one of the people who had called out your lies and silly talking points. Then I soon realized it was just you ranting about a personal attack.

              Fair enough I guess, but it's way too much to expect you to defend the fox and right wing blog drivel you posted.

              They really need to start giving you guys follow up talking points to use for when the original misinformation inevitably gets chewed up and broken down by facts and history. They could give you the talking point, and then a subsection with a modified lie or diversion for you to use.

              Right now you just look like you don't know what you're talking about. It's sad.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 9:56 am ET)
                11 1
                CoolSlaw, Maybe my comment came off that way, but I wouldn't agree with your description of it as a "personal attack".

                I was only letting booty know that he shouldn't hold his breath waiting for any substance from donuts, that there would either be nothing at all, or a bunch of mindless ranting ( it turned out to be option B).

                We're anonymous posters, I don't get my feelings hurt, or get angry at these zombies, but I enjoy calling them out on their crap when I have the chance. I visit this site because I like to see the media called out, and when the Foxbots insist on coming here to double down on the stoopid, I like to hit them with a little truth as well.

                When idiots like donut repeatedly say silly things, calling other people liars and posting their fantasies about the debates they've won, I like to point out that they always do it with no meat on the bone.

                No crying, no personal attacks, just the facts. I know it's not necessary to expose them any further, everybody here knows what they are, I just like to remind them that they've been asked, and failed miserably, to support the things they say.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 8:29 am ET)
              8 1
              No one who makes a joke that begins with "Once Obamacare is fully implemented" gets to call anyone else pathetic.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 9:38 am ET)
              9 2
              Donuts, where do you get the idea that people are crying when they call you out ? I'm laughing at you, you dolt.

              You came back with a bunch of insults, and didn't back up anything, just as I said you would.

              You don't seem to get it, that what you see as insults directed at you are just stating facts, but you respond with the same "condescending, elitist" BS every time. Do these words even mean anything to you, or do you think repeating them is a good substitute for actually making sense?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (September 06, 2011 9:38 am ET)
              7 5
              LOL!!! Laughter is not usually indicative of a person having one's feelings hurt, nor is it usually indicative of being "put in one's place." We're laughing at and, in my case, pitying your complete lack of understanding that you are being played by Fox and the hate talkers. There's nothing conservative about the crap they spew nor is there any honesty. When you come on this site and repeat, verbatim, the false talking points which are promulgated by these folks, NOBODY is going to take you seriously.

              ILD, you're a JOKE. We're not afraid of you, we're laughing at you. You're a very, very sad, pitiable little joke.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 10:15 am ET)
                8 2
                I'm seeing that more and more from the wingnuts, they get laughed at and called on their lies, and their reflex is to imagine that the people who call them out are "angry" or "crying".

                I don't think they're delusional enough to believe themselves. It's like a toddler who's bawling calling his sibling a crybaby, just a defense mechanism.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by mikehuck76 (September 07, 2011 2:09 pm ET)
                2 1
                We're laughing at and, in my case, pitying your complete lack of understanding that you are being played by Fox and the hate talkers. - bin

                Well said. I completely agree.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 9:45 pm ET)
              1 1
              Defending Fox's edit hack-job?

              Why do Fox News and the Republicans want to hurt Americans?

              Why do Fox News and the Republicans hate Americans?

              Why do you, ilovedonuts, hate Americans?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck76 (September 07, 2011 2:04 pm ET)
              1 1
              The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one. Doughnuts seems to have no actual understanding of his own words. He should be srudied and have his thoughts dissected. He is the perfect case-study for the teabagger mindset. He comes here pretended to be upset and offended by the term SOBs only to then pretend as if someone else is being a crybaby. Please, go on, doughnuts. I find your lack of basic cognitive ability fascinating.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by wesley_fpt (September 05, 2011 7:53 pm ET)
        22 1
        Are you really so brainwashed that you actually called Fox a "fair and balanced" network? Repeating their tagline like a zombie..I believe the best descriptive word for that is "pathetic." lol Fox is not a real news channell. It is an illegitimate, fully disgraced and discredited source of nothing.

        Why are you lying that MMFA deceptively edits it's videos?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PBVV (September 05, 2011 8:31 pm ET)
        11  
        The descriptive word is pathetic. Period.


        Yeah, It's BS that JH.Jr. did not use the cleaner, Christian, socially acceptable acronym---"S.O.B's"

        LOL & ROFLMAO.

        OR,... Maybe...
        J.H.Jr. shoulda said:

        " Everybody here's got to vote.
        If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let's take these
        male offspring of female canines out
        and give America back to America where we belong! Thank you very much!

        See?? That phraseology makes it totally crystal clear that Hoffa is referring to voting and not violence!!




        " Everybody here's got to vote.
        If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let's take these
        sons of b!tches out
        and give America back to America where we belong! Thank you very much!"

        See?? That phraseology makes it crystal clear that Hoffa is not talking about voting them out of office but is calling for physical violence against them.

        DUH!!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 8:33 pm ET)
          9 1
          Yep. Hoffa should've used more politically correct language. After all, we don't want to offend anyone, do we?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by phlcstgan (September 05, 2011 8:42 pm ET)
        20 1
        keep this in mind when MMfA edits their stuff - and often misrepresents their headlines as well.

        Example or shut the hell up.
        P.S. The Republican party just tried to get us to default on our debt just to make Obama look bad. Their number two in the House is threatening to deny emergency aid to his own constituents. They are sons of bitches.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:48 am ET)
          14 2
          Example or shut the hell up.


          From my experience, wingnuts don't understand the word "example". They think it means repeating a vague hallucination.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ilovedoughnuts (September 06, 2011 5:48 am ET)
          3 23
          "keep this in mind when MMfA edits their stuff - and often misrepresents their headlines as well.

          Example or shut the hell up."

          Here ya go son-of-a-bitch. Some deceptive headlines MMfA has used in just the last few months:

          Conservatives Can't Decide If Obama Was Too Busy Golfing Or Biking To Stop The Earthquake

          http://mediamatters.org/blog/201108230021#1453432

          ---------------------------------------------------
          Limbaugh Falsely Claims "49% Of The American People [Are] Not Paying Taxes"

          http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201107270021#1414734

          --------------------------------------------------
          Right-Wing Media Tout Bin Laden Death As Victory For Torture, Ignore Dispute

          http://mediamatters.org/research/201105040024#1315975

          -------------------------------------------------
          Oblivious: MRC's Bozell Asks Of The Media, "Where Were They When George Bush Won Us The War In Iraq?

          http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201105060040#1318511

          ---------------------------------------------------
          Ignoring Facts, Right-Wing Media Rush To Congratulate Bush On Bin Laden's Death

          http://mediamatters.org/research/201105050029#1318519

          --------------------------------------------------------
          Hannity Repeats Falsehood That "50 Percent Of Americans Don't Pay Taxes"

          http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201107180040#1405044

          -----------------------------------------------------------
          Coulter Pushes Falsehood That 50% Of Americans Pay No Taxes

          http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201108010029#1419627

          ------------------------------------------------------------
          "We Win": Conservative Media Celebrate Public Misconception That Climate Scientists "Falsified" Data

          http://mediamatters.org/research/201108080030#1430591

          ---------------------------------------------------------
          "Too Much Guinness": Right-Wing Media Again Smear Obama As A Drunk

          http://mediamatters.org/research/201105250020#1343294

          ---------------------------------------------------------

          New York Mag: Ailes Has Extensive Influence On GOP Politics, Thinks Palin Is An "Idiot"

          http://mediamatters.org/blog/201105220001#1338485

          ----------------------------------------------------------

          Are these ten enough or do you want more?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 7:07 am ET)
            21 1
            Okay, you've posted 10 articles from MMfA but did not say how they were evidence that MMfA edits or posts deceptive headlines or whatever you think these show. For clarity's sake, perhaps you could pick one or two and provide some evidence for those.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by GreenLantern (September 06, 2011 8:14 am ET)
            10  
            Hah, that last one defaults to a post by "normalguy".
            Why can't you guys just use ONE screename?
            pathetic........
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (September 06, 2011 9:42 am ET)
              11 2
              So, this is normalguy? LOL!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:13 am ET)
                2  
                And OnementalGiant. He's embarrassed himself under a few nicknames.

                But he keeps using Lispy Limbaugh as a source, and thinking he's going to not fail with each new screen name. The definition of insanity.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 8:29 am ET)
            12  
            Well, no, they're not enough, considering none of them feature what you accuse MMfA of doing.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 9:12 pm ET)
        18 5
        donutluvr

        You are a LIAR and a brainwashed MORON. Saying FOX is the only fair and balanced news station may possibly be the stupidest thing ever written in the English language. GOD but you are pathetic. WHY did they edit it so dishonestly? We both know why. So what if he called Republicans sons of bitches your side has called us much worse but that isnt the point. FOX LIED. Whatever pathetic excuses you want to make they LIED. They dishonestly took a phrase out of context to give a misconception.

        BTW you are a LIAR. They do not.

        Why stoop to such low levels as LYING with this cheap tactic? It might have been rude but really considering what we are called by Micheal Savage, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and the like it is pretty weak and what it WASNT was a call for violence as Fox tried to make it look like. We understand you are stupid and love to be lied to. We understand you are a LIAR and see nothing wrong with telling lies. Decent humans see things differently than soulless brainwashed morons like you

        Obama means it and can say what he wants but he isnt Hoffas boss. Nor mine. The president works for me. They arent BS speeches just because you WISH the left would unilaterally disarm and just TAKE the abuse from your side without giving it back. You snivel like a punk that the left treats you guys the way you treat us and its pitiful. YOU are pitiful

        The rest of your ignorance spoon fed you by the screechmonkeys that do your thinking for you is just a bunch of lies that you are stupid enough to spew like the mindless propaganda parrot you are. No one in their right mind is STUPID enough to care what stupidity and lies you want to spew today. You disgust all decent human beings

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bdwatcher (September 05, 2011 9:35 pm ET)
             
          I agree that there was phrases taken out, but you should listen prior not only was obviously taken out, but the threat to the Tea Party sure seems rather obvious too... What happened to civility. Biden's remarks, the CBC, all the racial undertones. It seems Middle America is under attack, not the unions... Perhaps those who have reason to worry about their power being taken from them are those who make the most derogatory remarks along with threats.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRezVJCJeeM
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ilovedoughnuts (September 06, 2011 5:56 am ET)
          2 21
          I told you before kabnut that I don't plan on responding to your posts because you are such a freak of nature. You are way past mental dysfunctionality - rhe only word that fits to describe you is "freak".

          BTW, those that encourage kabnut by giving him a thumbs up are also freaks.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 7:17 am ET)
            15  
            You told kabniel that you won't respond to his/her posts, then you turn around and do it again anyway just to insult and not address anything within the post? And insult others as well.

            Interesting....

            Why do you come here, then?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 10:20 am ET)
              9 1
              To remind us once again that we're all "idiots" and he's not and respond to people he won't respond to.

              Oh yes, and hate on his Obama.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:16 am ET)
                1  
                And he's investigating the conspiracy of the MMFA software that's singled him out to cancel out his thumbs downs with thumbs ups. ( I'm not making that up, he's off his nut)
                Report Abuse
            • Author by MyassisDragon (September 06, 2011 12:42 pm ET)
              5  
              Because he's paid to...
              Report Abuse
      • Author by pete x tp (September 05, 2011 9:50 pm ET)
        14 1
        It's neither fair nor balanced to present both sides of an argument when one of those sides is bull dung. Of course, in most instances, SaudiFAUX "News" only presents the bull dung or devotes 90% of their time to shouting down that which is not bull dung.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mmfvl (September 05, 2011 9:51 pm ET)
        3 33
        Oh the hypocrisy from the leftys considering obama's speech in Tucson telling us to stop the 'dupniking' treatment political adversaries. Was that before or after he told us to move to the back of the bus?

        Anyway... expect in quick time for the president to tell hoffa to tone it down!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 10:00 pm ET)
          23 1
          for what moron? nothing brings out the pesky flies like the smell of fresh sh!t on Fox and the right -wing flogosphere.Naughty, naughty Jimmy Jr., kinda makes me proud to be American. I think he should turn it up, phuck a beer summit, punk teabaggin sellouts.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 10:00 pm ET)
          19 1
          considering obama's speech in Tucson telling us to stop the 'dupniking' treatment political adversaries. Was that before or after he told us to move to the back of the bus?


          It was before, however it was after the FOXPAC teabaggers told him to "go to hell" by accusing him of "using civility as censorship"

          Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 10:05 pm ET)
          15 4
          MMMoron

          You are a LIAR. The president doesnt get to tell us what to do. He can only make suggestions. GOD but you are a pathetic brainwashed moron. Far too stupid to know what the word hypocrisy means.

          Hoffa didnt call for any violence. By this time even someone as STUPID as you knows that and you are just lying because you are a LIAR.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 12:04 am ET)
          17  
          Was that before or after he told us to move to the back of the bus?

          Never happened.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 1:14 am ET)
            8  
            They're pretending they don't know the difference between sitting in the back seat and riding in the back of the bus.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 1:43 am ET)
              5  
              Kickin' in the front seat
              Sittin' in the back seat
              Gotta make my mind up
              Which seat can I take?


              ....

              ..

              .........

              ...I'm truly very sorry!
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:50 am ET)
              12 1
              Being a Foxbot involves a lot of make-believe.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2011 12:00 pm ET)
          8  
          I dare you to come up with a quote of Obama saying for you to move to the back of THE BUS
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 10:14 pm ET)
        20 1
        Then MMfA admits FOX aired the full context in other FOX segments: "But fuller context included in other Fox segments makes clear that Hoffa wasn't calling for violence but was actually urging the crowd to vote out Republican members of Congress."




        Wow, the lies never stop.

        2 segments of unedited tape
        vs
        about 200 blogs, web-posts, tweets from twits using and other FOXPAC radio partners using the edited comments

        Fair and balanced... in a fascist world
        Report Abuse
        • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 11:14 pm ET)
          12  
          That's the thing, this is a single sentence by Hoffa that was dishonestly edited to remove very important context. See above with my "edit" of Psalm 14:1.

          If they're going to post what Hoffa said, at least put the entire sentence up. Yeesh.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jonimacaroni1 (September 06, 2011 12:40 am ET)
        10 1
        OMG. He used a curse phrase. My tender ears and eyes. How dreadful.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CatsRBigLuv (September 06, 2011 2:01 am ET)
        10  
        ilovedoghnuts writes
        How desperate is MMfA in their efforts to badmouth the only fair and balanced news outlet in America?


        First of all, Fox News makes a parody of itself as a matter of daily practice. Its not badmouthing to point out how pathetically skewed this supposed news source really is. Its a professional critique, one more than merited by the poor choices and negligent practices that are the daily routine on Fox News itself.


        Oh, and btw, ever wonder why Tony Blair took Britan into Bushs war, despite the vast majority of British citizens being opposed to it? Isnt this what a Puppet Master really does? I mean, fusing his media empire with international governments in order to ensure that his own interests and agendas remain protected and endowed, even against the wishes of a democratic electorate?

        So why does Murdoch own such influence over foreign governments? AS a media mogul, doesnt that make him a bit of a big brother, big government advocate himself?

        Why is Fox News such a complete fusion of media with the top down directive of the GOP? Why is it staffed by Career GOP politicians and hopefuls (not to mention lunatic religious zealots and violent bigots)? Thats pretty big government there in the raw.

        Why does everything promoted on Fox magically fit the needs of private businesses in Murdochs back pocket? Why does the GOP agenda do as well.

        Does Rupert work for the GOP or do they, like Blair, work for him?




        Report Abuse
      • Author by HughG (September 06, 2011 9:57 am ET)
        9  
        Oh, nooos! A union leader called Teabaggers "sons of bitches!" I do declare, I'm about to be laid low with an attack of the vapors! Oh, dearie me!

        I recall Fox News and BigGovernment.com pushing relentless criticism of GW Bush when he called Clymer a "Major League A$$hole," and of Cheney when he told Sen. Leahy to "Go Phukk Yourself" on the floor of the Senate.

        Right? Right? They must have criticized that nasty language, right? Because they wouldn't engage in partisan double-standards. Right?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 11:43 am ET)
        6  
        "So the below "full context" version where he calls Republicans "son of a bitches" is OK with you people"

        No, it was a weak-kneed description and not even remotely accurate. He should have said called them "idiotic, gun-loving, Bible-thumping, bought-and-paid-for corporate, facist, iceholes!".

        Report Abuse
      • Author by hoopvillain (September 06, 2011 1:16 pm ET)
        5  
        "So the below "full context" version where he calls Republicans "son of a bitches" is OK with you people..."
        Yes, it is fine with me because it is accurate in portraying the sentiment.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fourechodog (September 05, 2011 7:48 pm ET)
         
      It's obvious that Hoffa didn't mean anything by it. And it's obvious that those X's on Sarah Palin's map were cross-hairs too, right?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JayTea (September 05, 2011 7:51 pm ET)
         
      Gee, wouldn't it be helpful if MMfA actually published the entire quote, in the full context? Why would they only print the omitted part? And do they have unedited video of the whole statement, showing its context?

      J.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (September 05, 2011 8:29 pm ET)
      11 1
      That IS violence in Foxland. Voting out republicans is a violent act as far as they're concerned and we wouldn't even have a vote if they had their way.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phlcstgan (September 05, 2011 8:53 pm ET)
        12 1
        I guess that's only natural; the right already thinks calling them stupid is censorship, so removing them from office is genocide. And not the cool kind, like they want for Muslims.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by phlcstgan (September 05, 2011 8:40 pm ET)
      9 1
      Even if he HAD been saying what they misreported, isn't that just a "second amendment solution"? Why does Fox hate the Constooshun?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by labman57 (September 05, 2011 9:06 pm ET)
      10 1
      To paraphrase Simon and Garfunkel, the fair (of skin) and (emotionally im)balanced folks at FOX PAC "report what they want to report and disregard the rest".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (September 05, 2011 9:29 pm ET)
      10 2

      Ctrl-r-Us

      Roger Ailes hires only the top graduates from the Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-X School of Editing.

      FOX NEWS - We Distort, You're Deceived

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfvl (September 05, 2011 9:38 pm ET)
      2 32
      C'mon, knowing unions as we do, we should be surprised that hoffa even had to plant this idea out loud in da members' craniums?

      Bada-bing!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 9:42 pm ET)
        21 1
        Yep. We all know the caricature. Thanks.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 05, 2011 10:17 pm ET)
          21 3
          I think we should just ignore the FOXPAC teabagger trolls, they know FOXPAC got caught in a lie, they just don't want to admit the proverbial argument that "Santa has the same handwriting as their mom."
          Report Abuse
        • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 12:03 am ET)
          12 1
          Again with that adorable "I watched a movie and think I understand something" teabagger mentality.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 9:45 pm ET)
        16 4
        MMMoron

        You are a LIAR. You know nothing about unions. You know only what you have been told to think about unions. You only spew what you have been brainwashed to think about unions.

        You are also far too stupid to even be talking about craniums in any way. This was a LIE. The only thing he planted was the very GOOD idea that they should be voted out of office.

        We KNOW how much you love to tell lies and we know how much you love to be lied to but ever for you this is pathetic. You are simply disgusting
        Report Abuse
      • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 11:56 am ET)
        5 1
        Does any part of your understanding of the world not come from TV and movie cliches?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mediamatters? (September 05, 2011 10:28 pm ET)
         
      I'm a little confused. So, if at a tea party rally someone said in regards to the next election. "We need to all get out and vote. President Obama is a son of a bitch and we need to take him out!" You would be ok with that? Because it would seem inappropriate to me. Media Matters it would be a breath of fresh air if you could maybe mention that Hoffa was wrong to engage in such hateful rhetoric and that it demeans the president who has asked for more civility.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NoNannyNeeded (September 05, 2011 10:31 pm ET)
      5 35
      Hoffa screaming his rhetoric
      Here is another video of Jim Hoffa's speech today. If you would listen to the statments made PRIOR to what MMFA posted (attempting to only have you see what they want yout to see) is another example of why unions are a disgrace. Just another example of unions feeding their sheep line after line. Don't think for yourself, we'll think for you!

      The hyocrisy here is absolutely amazing!!! Anything a Republican says such as "crosshairs" is an example of "violent rhetoric" that brings Rep. Pelosi to tears. Yet here we have this mobster calling them Obama's army ready for war, liking a good fight, and of course his classless statement of the day.

      Not to mention he claims jobs are going overseas and south of the border and we need to bring jobs back to the USA. Please tell me then why our DOJ has told Gibson Guitars if they move their manufacturing Madagascar their legal situation would go away. That would be a total of 1,200 in TN, AR, & MT. Wonder if those are union jobs?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (September 05, 2011 10:44 pm ET)
        22 5
        Nannybrain

        You are a LIAR. I dont get brainwashed by my union. My union works for me. It is direct democracy. GOD but you are stupid and brainwashed. Feel free to work for starvation wages because you are so stupid and so brainwashed you have been told to hate unions just like you have been told what to think. It must suck to be so as stupid as you and know you are too stupid to think for yourself.

        There is no hypocrisy here. Hoffa was clearly talking about voting them out while YOU being so STUPID and such a ridiculous propaganda parrot want to twist reality into a pretzel to claim putting crosshairs on someones district or talking about second amendment solutions dont mean what EVERY thinking person, which sadly you will never be, knows they mean. Here was a man talking about ELECTORAL victories, nothing remotly violent. You are a LIAR.

        Why dont you cite a reference for your CLAIM about what the DOJ told Gibson and dont waste our time with some rightwing nutbag site. They are good enough to sucker braindead MORONS like you but rational humans want actual evidence.

        You are really a disgusting piece of garbage. Unions are a disgrace for bringing living wages, job security and decent working conditions to workers. YOU are a disgrace for being so brainwashed and such a useful idiot that you would spew idiocy against your own best interest to kiss the butt of power and wealth, begging for some scraps. Be sure to get way up their in the brown after all you lost all your dignity and self respect long ago and you NEVER had a brain of your own

        Report Abuse
        • Author by leatherhelmet (September 05, 2011 11:39 pm ET)
          1 26
          The claim is from Gibson's CEO who says it is in the court pleadings by the DOJ.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kabniel (September 06, 2011 12:51 am ET)
            10 2
            And I SERIOUSLY doubt it. If you had an iota of sense you would too.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 3:03 am ET)
            11 1
            Of course, what the pleading actually says is that it's illegal in Madagascar to export the raw wood, but it is legal to export finished wood products -- in this case, fingerboards for their guitars -- so it's a simple statement of fact that if Gibson was importing finished fingerboards as they claimed in their customs paperwork, they wouldn't be in trouble.

            There's about a mile between that statement and claiming that the DOJ "told" them to move their manufacturing overseas.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 2:16 pm ET)
              4 1
              You have demonstrated how a little intellectual curiosity can go a long way. Meanwhile, leatherface still believes that the DOJ told Gibson to move their manufacturing overseas for no good reason (avoiding prosecution under international agreements and laws).

              BTW-Leatherface, Gibson only builds their top end models in the US (and that has been the situation for over 25 years). The majority of their instruments and equipment they sell here are Korean-made (formerly Japanese-made).
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 4:00 pm ET)
                2 1
                Meanwhile, leatherface still believes that the DOJ told Gibson to move their manufacturing overseas for no good reason

                Thanks -- I'm lucky in that I get paid to indulge my intellectual curiosity. You mistake my intention though. I never expected to teach leatherybrain anything -- he/she has no room for an opposing viewpoint. There are lots of others who, like me, hadn't heard anything about this Gibson thing until it was posted here. They're the ones I post for.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by fantagor (September 07, 2011 5:05 pm ET)
              1 1
              There's a reason unfinished wood is illegal: it might be infested with some bug that isn't indigenous to the USA, one without a natural predator, that will spread like a plague and kill trees on a nationwide basis.

              This is a regulation that Americans should favor, unless the smell of pesticides and the sight of dead trees is your "thing".

              Randy
              Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 10:48 pm ET)
        24 4
        Screaming? Sounded like a typical stump speech. You don't like that fact he mentions jobs going overseas, or what?

        I'm interested in your reference about Gibson Guitars. What's the facts on that, please give a source.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (September 05, 2011 11:01 pm ET)
          20 3
          Well here's a story about Gibson Guitars and the Feds from NPR. The only references to moving to Madagascar were on right wing blogs, so that's fairly certain to be a lie or vapid exaggeration.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by leatherhelmet (September 05, 2011 11:42 pm ET)
            1 24
            Here is audio of the CEO making the allegation. He said it is in the court pleadings. So no, it is not a lie or vapid exaggeration.
            http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2011/08/31/doj-advises-gibson-guitar-to-export-labor/

            The media should demand copies of the pleadings to verify whether the CEO is telling the truth.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by danielsangeo (September 05, 2011 11:53 pm ET)
              19 2
              From what I can glean from the insane right wing websites that claim that the DOJ is "forcing" Gibson to move operations to Madagascar to avoid penalties was this:

              Gibson allegedly broke the law and imported illegal wood from Madagascar for their guitars. The DOJ came in and busted Gibson for their allegedly illegal actions. The DOJ stated that had Gibson moved their operations to Madagascar, they could've used the wood but, since they didn't and, instead, allegedly >>BROKE THE LAW<< (this is something the right wing websites seem to fail to mention), that's why the DOJ is now involved.

              The investigation is ongoing but I don't buy into the notion that the DOJ said "move your operations".
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 1:52 am ET)
                19 2
                I'm shocked ! A right wing fairy tale turns out to be some grossly misrepresented incident that they've been misled to not understand ??

                I'm sure this will make them reconsider their sources, and fact-check all of their info in the future. </sarc>

                Report Abuse
              • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 3:19 am ET)
                14 1
                It caught my attention to, so I looked it up and read through a bunch of the paperwork filed in the case. This motion to strike gives a pretty thorough explanation if you feel like wading through the legalese.

                Essentially, since 2006, it's been illegal to export unfinished wood from Madagascar, but it is legal to export finished wood products. "finished wood products" has a specific definition and it includes "fingerboards" and "fretboards" for musical instruments. The definition explicitly states that "finished wood products" are finished to the point that the wood could not be realistically used for anything other than its stated use. Gibson applied that to what they call "fingerboard blanks" which are rough blocks of wood cut to about the right size and shape to finish into fingerboards.

                DoJ has Gibson emails that talk about establishing sources for legal export in the long term and identify a trader they can use in the interim who deals in the "grey market". The emails make it pretty clear that Gibson knew they were buying illegally exported wood and were well aware that if they'd imported actual fingerboards from Madagascar instead of the wood to make them, they wouldn't be in trouble.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 4:01 am ET)
                  11  
                  Thanks for fleshing out more information about the case. I was sickened by the amount of right-wing vitriol when trying to find out more information about the case that I had to stop researching.

                  Kudos to you for having a much stronger constitution than me.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 9:18 am ET)
                    8 1
                    Oh, I didn't read the blogs and commentary. I was looking for facts, not opinion. I waded through 5 pages of Google results to find the name of the case, then looked it up on PACER to read the actual legal pleadings. I skimmed them, so I may have missed the DoJ memo that said "move your manufacturing plants to Madagascar and this will all go away" but I somehow doubt that it's there.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 9:46 am ET)
                      7  
                      I waded through 5 pages of Google results


                      And that's why you have a stronger constitution than me. ;)
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 2:31 pm ET)
                      5 1
                      "I waded through 5 pages of Google results to find the name of the case"

                      And do you know why? Because the right wing websites pay a lot of money to get their results listed first. Plus, the right wing echo chamber means that it only takes about a day from a single story on Drudge to be the topic of discussion on 100's of right wing websites and eventually the lead story on Fox. What adds to the complexity is that you are now googling the lie rather than the truth, so it takes longer to sift through through the BS. It makes getting to the truth a matter of real effort. That is their goal.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 2:53 pm ET)
                        3 2
                        I'm a freelance writer who makes the lion's share of my money writing web content, so yeah, I know exactly how that works. The right wing noise machine is very very good at gaming the search engines to push the results they want up to the top of the search engine results pages.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 4:56 pm ET)
                        4 2
                        That's interesting, and so obvious when trying to find the real story.

                        It happens a lot, some wingnut drops a vague reference to a talking-points topic, and I'll try to look it up with a few key words.

                        Invariably, the first few pages are RedState, FoxNation and Drudge, and every senior citizen with a wordpress page who can copy & paste. Lots of paraphrasing, and short phrases in quotes.

                        Sometimes it takes five or ten Google pages to get to an actual news account of the item.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by kabniel (September 06, 2011 12:49 am ET)
              10 1
              A CLAIM by a defendent in a court case. YEAH. Try harder. Daniel is almost certainly right as it makes sense. So I would say it indeed WAS a lie or a vapid exageration. You should demand better evidence before you buy into such inane nonsense. Especially as much as the right LIES lately and as often as it has been proven that the idiocy you spew is wildly and FANTASTICALLY wrong. Or do you just like being lied to?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Kid Funkadelic (September 06, 2011 3:41 am ET)
              10 1
              Wasn't Redstate the site that had illustrations of the POTUS pre-teen daughters as pregnant? Leatherhelmet it shows the type of character you have when you get your information from scum like them.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Bongo Fury (September 06, 2011 12:53 am ET)
            8 1
            I've enjoyed playing Gibsons for years, but I don't condone them for using scarce, valuable woods. Maybe Martin guitars should get a second look too, since they use valuable wood also.

            Personally, I prefer Ovation acoustics to Martins.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 2:33 pm ET)
              3 1
              For acoustics:
              1. Martin
              2. Taylor
              3. Tie - Ovation & Takamine (not Jasmine)
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 06, 2011 5:05 pm ET)
              2 3
              I like the look and feel of the woods, but that's a good point, maybe somebody will come up with a composite or a renewable domestic wood that works as well. Hemp fingerboards?

              The case above is also interesting for the "U.S. made" vs. "Overseas" aspect. I wasn't aware of the restrictions on finished and unfinished wood, but I wonder if there are specs as to how much has to be made here to be called " American".

              I like to buy American when I can, but as the manufacturers "second" brands, like Gibson's Epiphone, have increased in quality over the past few decades, it makes the choice tougher.

              I recently bought a bass made in Indonesia by an American company, I just really liked it, and I could justify it in the budget. It was assembled there, and sent to their shop in Orange, CA for set-up.

              I also have a Mexican Strat that I love, but I bought it used, so I can say I bought American. ;0)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 10:25 pm ET)
                2 1
                I miss my MIM Strat! Is Ibanez AS73 an environmentally friendly guitar? :)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:23 am ET)
                  1 1
                  I'm not familiar with that one. I have a made in Japan Ibanez Blazer series Strat copy( Bought used in the early 80s) that I still like and play a lot. It sounds great.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by heehee..santorum (September 05, 2011 11:21 pm ET)
        13 1
        NoNannyNeeded......maybe you should should go ahead and shell out the bucks for that nanny, apparently you think people care what you say. A nanny maybe could help you find the other special people that would love to read your deep and patriotic musings.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikelartist (September 05, 2011 11:41 pm ET)
        13 1
        Another jelly-spined bagger that has no ability to discern context. You DO realize that by showing the entire clip it defeats your entire premise don't you?

        No violent rhetoric, no screaming and no call for using weapons.

        Don't forget in your crosshairs whine that the right wing are the ones collecting and fomenting fear of the 2nd amendment rights being infringed.

        Hows that war on guns you claim Obama is waging coming along? Another idiot right wing lie exposed and debunked.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by phlcstgan (September 06, 2011 12:06 am ET)
        12 1
        And the official Most Boring Troll Ever (tm) retains her title with flying colors. Yay.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Kid Funkadelic (September 06, 2011 3:52 am ET)
        8 1
        How many Republicans have Teamsters killed? Now how many Americans have killed because of misinformation on Fox? Did Democrats bomb the Atlanta Olympics? Did Democrats shoot up the Tides Foundations. Did Democrats bring loaded guns and rifles to where the President was having his Health Care meetings? Did Democrats kill three policemen in Pittsburgh because of something that Glenn Beck said? IF THERE WAS NO FOX TELEVISION MORE PEOPLE MIGHT BE ALIVE TODAY.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:26 am ET)
          1 1
          I don't see many of your questions being answered, Kid. They'll breeze right by that post.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by tspang (September 05, 2011 10:41 pm ET)
      15 3
      This is just more wingnut projection, on a massive Fox "news" scale. Aware that conservative politicians and their followers have been taking heat for violent rhetoric (2nd amendment remedies, we came unarmed this time, etc), they are making a concerted effort to portray the other side as even more guilty, thus deflecting the focus from themselves.

      They do this all the time. The only thing surprising about this is attempt is how clumsy and obvious it is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MOM (September 05, 2011 10:54 pm ET)
      16 3
      I hope every network has this story, puts it out there, then lets Fox squirm to get out of it. Maybe they could start their report with "Some say". Call them out loudly and do it often.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 8:57 am ET)
        3 1
        Unfortunately, every network IS putting it out, with the Fox spin on it. I just watched ten minutes of the entire crew on Morning Joe sitting around the table going on and on about how unlikely it is that the President will call Hoffa out for his "violent rhetoric" and not one person rolled their eyes or pointed out that there is nothing inherently violent about the words "take them out". At all.

        I won't hold my breath waiting for MMFA to call Morning Joe out, though. It's on MSNBC, and wasn't spoken by one of the usual suspects. MMFA consistently ignores the most blatantly ridiculous things said on Morning Joe -- unless they're quoting Pat Buchannan. In my mind, this cr*p is even more dangerous when it crosses over into media that's usually seen as more left-leaning (yes, we all know that Morning Joe could comfortably air on Fox most of the time, but people who don't watch it assume that anything on MSNBC is loony left), because it legitimizes the bullsh1t and makes it part of the "center" narrative.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (September 05, 2011 11:34 pm ET)
      11 2
      It doesn't matter how you word anything to Andrew Breitbart. He is a spineless sissy that is afraid of his own shadow. He sees threats and conspiracy in children's cartoons for crying out loud.

      What a jelly.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hicycles (September 06, 2011 3:33 am ET)
         
      What's interesting is that the full footage was not included in this article...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Kid Funkadelic (September 06, 2011 3:34 am ET)
      7 1
      When Hoffa or any other Union leader tell people to shoot them in the head like Glenn Beck said you can get back to me. More people died or got killed because of Fox hysteria than anything else. The Norway shooter monitored American media. You have Nazi gangs in Russia going around beating minorities. Don't people get it that what America puts out the world will try to imitate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (September 06, 2011 4:30 am ET)
      2 14
      So, the context of the speech aside, it is ok to call your opponents the "offspring of a female canine"? Hoffa, you are an "illegetimate child"..
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 4:38 am ET)
        8 2
        Should we tailor our language so as to not offend people?

        Also, "So, the fact that Fox utterly fabricated something aside..."

        Fixed.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 6:34 am ET)
        9 2
        So, which of our favorite far right spittle spewers came out with a, "I do declare--Mr. Hoffa's crass vulgarity was just too much for my virgin ears to handle. I may faint." Was it Breitbart?

        Context is the central issue on this particular manufactured matter as well you know.

        I'm surprised, oscar. You're not usually a part of the "move the goalposts" crowd.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 9:11 am ET)
        5  
        Context is more than just the words around a phrase. You use different words when addressing your grandmother than you do when speaking to your buddies in the locker room. Hoffa was speaking at a Union rally, not on a news show or an interview with the national media.

        Not words I would have used in any public setting, and not words I condone in this setting -- and if that's what people were objecting to, we'd be having a different conversation. It's not, though. The controversy the RW chose to take to the bank was that Hoffa was calling for violence, and when that was disproved, that he was using violent rhetoric, not that he used uncourth language to refer to political opponents.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by o rly (September 06, 2011 9:46 am ET)
        4  
        Hey, I thought you righties hated PC culture. You should be praising Hoffa for speaking his mind!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 2:41 pm ET)
        3 1
        First, Republican politicians are not Hoffa's opponents. He is not running for public office.

        And you are correct, it was very rude to dog lovers everywhere for Hoffa to refer to the GOP in those terms.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 9:24 am ET)
      2 14
      seems like media matters is in clean up for the left more often lately
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 9:35 am ET)
        10 1
        If by "clean up" you mean scrub away a layer of dirt intentionally tossed over the facts by some of our favorite far right media mudslingers . . .

        Well, yeah. That's what they do here.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 10:00 am ET)
          2 14

          Well, yeah. That's what they do here.


          no way to paint a rosy pic on what this guy said. MM is in clean-up mode.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 10:10 am ET)
            11  
            A clean up would suggest a removal of some type. The removal we've seen comes from our fine friends at Fox who eagerly edited away the, "Everybody here's got to vote," part of Hoffa's speech so that they could run with a harsher to the ear soundbite that they could get all outraged over.

            It's not so much an attempt to paint a rosy picture rather than push aside the obstruction that has intentionally be put in place to block their audience from getting the full view.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by MickD (September 06, 2011 11:57 am ET)
            7  
            Better get out your fainting couch, sancheuz.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 9:43 am ET)
        4  
        seems like you have lost your absorbency
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 9:32 am ET)
      2 13
      Right-wing bloggers misled by dishonest Fox News video editing are attacking Teamsters President James Hoffa, Jr. for supposedly urging violence against Tea Party activists during a Labor Day speech


      maybe you should try citing some references MM
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 9:39 am ET)
        10 1
        The article above hold links to BigGovernment, Real Clear Politics, the Daily Caller, Media Research Center, and Drudge.

        Maybe you should click on them before putting your fingers on the keyboard.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 10:01 am ET)
          11 1
          sancheeuz, are you so lonely that you would expose your deep stupidity to anyone? everyone? What needs cleaning up? Even post-editing, Hoffa's words are being compared to the Sheriff in Arizona speaking out after his friend was shot in the face,what does a Union boss cussing or getting riled up for an election have in common with a man calling for common-sense restraint after a tragedy ? Conservatives are not conservatives any more. They have been hijacked by by idiots. Not even USEFUL idiots, I am a useful idiot and that is offensive to me.Oh, and phuck ypur references, I don't let an appliance called a computer form or defend my world view. Stupid people do.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 11:02 am ET)
            5 1
            hh..s right on point about the Repugnican Party. This article should interest you:

            Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult

            Saturday 3 September 2011

            by: Mike Lofgren, Truthout | News Analysis
            ]Your text to link here...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 11:25 am ET)
              9 1
              I can never agree with conservatives, but what now passes for conservatism is a bald-faced lie. I always thought of conservatives as misguided and boring, but lunatic-fringe has commandeered the bus.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 2:47 pm ET)
        3 1
        Maybe you should try using the links in the article moron.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 1:31 am ET)
        1 1
        In case MW didn't hold your hand well enough, sancheuz, it's those purty blue letters, moron.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 9:44 am ET)
      2 11
      what ever happened to civil discourse?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 9:47 am ET)
        10 1
        It died on October 7, 1996--the day Fox News was launched.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 9:51 am ET)
          10 1
          After suffering a lengthy illness that began on August 1, 1988--the day The Rush Limbaugh Show was launched.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 10:05 am ET)
        9 1
        You're right, sancheuz. Why is Fox not engaging in civil discourse?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by barscotch9441 (September 07, 2011 11:58 pm ET)
        1 1
        It was shot repeatedly in the head in brutal execution style in Boston in 1981 by Richard Mellon Scaife when he called a reporter inquiring about his financial ties to right-wing politicians a "******* communist ****."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (September 06, 2011 9:45 am ET)
      8 2
      Quick! Who said the following:

      "Don't retreat, reload!"

      A) Jimmy Hoffa
      B) Al Gore
      C) Karl Marx
      D) Sarah Palin
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 10:04 am ET)
        9 2
        Bonus question:

        Who said the following?

        "You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years.

        "I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take [him] out."


        A) Keith Olbermann
        B) Rachel Maddow
        C) Sharron Angle
        D) Mary Kay Henry
        Report Abuse
      • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 10:12 am ET)
        4 12
        Quick! Who was calling out for civility in our political discourse?:
        a)the left
        b)pres. Obama
        c)Media Matters
        d)all of the above

        Quick! Who called out Hoffa's speech as non-civil?
        a)pres. Obama
        b)MM
        c)debbie wasserman schultz
        d) none of the above


        Quick! Who doubled down on their violent rhetoric saying the following when asked if he would repeat the same statement: "I would because I believe it," he said. "They've declared war on us. We didn't declare war on them, they declared war on us. We're fighting back. The question is, who started the war?"

        a)jimmy hoffa
        b)jimmy hoffa
        c)jimmy hoffa
        d)all of the above
        Report Abuse
        • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 10:14 am ET)
          9 1
          Last question: E) None of the above, because Hoffa's sentence was NON-VIOLENT.

          Get it?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MidnightWriter (September 06, 2011 10:15 am ET)
          11 2
          Quick! Who can't tell the difference between Jimmy Hoffa, who is dead, and James Hoffa, who is alive and being smeared?

          Sorry kids, no multiple choice on this one, but the answer should be obvious.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 10:20 am ET)
            2 8
            he he.. nice try.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 10:31 am ET)
            9 3
            Unions have a bloody history. Hoffa senior represents the worst aspect of a union that grew strong but abusive.

            The origins of unions are steeped in the blood of the low paid workers, who marched for a better life and were beaten, murdered, thrown in jail and abused just for standing up for themselves.

            In modern history we have corporate abuse by Walmart and mining companies to keep out unions because they would protect workers.

            Unions are being demonized by the right wing corporatists and their sucker followers because they represent the workers. This should wake people like doughnut lover, sancheuz and heenow up, but they remain duped by the propaganda.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 11:12 am ET)
              7 1
              Hi Mary,check out this opinion:

              September 05, 2011 11:15 AM Reflecting on a ‘cultural shift’ on Labor Day

              By Steve BenenIn an 1861 address to Congress, Abraham Lincoln said, “Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”*

              One assumes, if President Obama said the same thing, Republicans would immediately brand him a socialist. Hell, they’ve already branded him a socialist for adopting policies moderate Republicans found reasonable in the 1990s.

              Similarly, Pope John Paul II offered a powerful argument in support of worker protections in 1981, not only agreeing with Lincoln’s approach that prioritizes “labor over capital,” but also writing that unions “grew up from the struggle of the workers … to protect their just rights vis-a-vis the entrepreneurs and the owners of the means of production,” or to insist that “the experience of history teaches that organizations of this type are an indispensable element of social life.”
              read the whole piece here:
              Your text to link here...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 11:30 am ET)
                6 2
                Good read, thanks.

                The thing is, attacking unions is a weak strategy in the long run but will cause pain and suffering as long as people buy into it. I wish evolution would speed up a bit.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 12:10 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  Agree totally Mary. The thing is for these multi-nationals workers unions are the one of the last vestiges of working people organizations. Workers organized to fight in their own interest against the powerful multi-national corporations who only care about the bottom line. Financiers and hedge-fund managers who will buy companies ,then merge them,lay off workers and move companies to slave labor areas. Their allegiance is to their stockholders not to the workers. They worship profit and that is what drives them by eliminating unions you destroy one of the main mechanisms workers have to fight and educate in their own interest and they are left to the whims of the multi-nationals.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 2:56 pm ET)
                4 1
                "Hell, they've already branded him a socialist for adopting policies moderate Republicans found reasonable in the 1990s."

                That's an understatement:
                1) Mandatory Health Insurance-Richard M Nixon suggested that all CORPORATIONS be required to provide health insurance to their workers. In the 1990's the Heritage Foundation (conservative drunk tank) and the GOP proposed mandatory insurance as an alternative to Hillarycare.

                2) Cap & Trade legislation - an attorney in the Reagan administration came up with the notion as a way to privatize pollution prevention. Widely endorsed by Heritage and the GOP (McCain/Palin supported in their platform) until the black man was elected.

                3) Reducing payroll taxes to stimulate job growth widely endorsed and proposed by the GOP, CATO and Heritage until now that the black man in the White House endorses it.

                Do I really need to go on?
                Report Abuse
            • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 11:27 am ET)
              1 12
              here's the thing Mary. I agree that walmart pays crap, and working at a mining company is very risky. According to your argument though, the only solution to this prob is to unionize. I disagree. Someone who goes to apply at these places should know what they are getting into. If one wants something better then a min wage or risky job, then one can do much to improve themselves and reach higher. It's all about personal responsibility. The system inherently becomes socialized in a unionized state, as the true factors of market, competition and demand, are removed from play and replaced with pre-determined and unrealistic pressures called "social justice".
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 11:32 am ET)
                9 2
                Libertarian pie in the sky. You do know that there are not enough jobs right? And that many people are unable to create their own jobs either by lack of education or natural ability.

                Outsourcing is the biggest problem with jobs right now.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (September 06, 2011 11:33 am ET)
                  8 1
                  Also lack of capital. Most unemployed or underemployed workers can't find work. You should check out why.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 11:37 am ET)
                7  
                You could say the same thing about a union shop. It's about personal responsibility, isn't it? You should know what you're getting into, right?

                What right is it of anyone to tell employees that they can't unionize or that unionizing is "bad"?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 11:40 am ET)
                6  
                Unionization IS an equalizing market force. It allows many people to join their resources together in order to equal the resources of a more powerful player. That's the very essence of an equalizing market force.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 11:54 am ET)
                  1 9
                  M: Perhaps you are right that there aren't enough jobs. That doesn't change the fact that you increase your chances of getting a "better" job by working hard to improve yourself. Why should someone who dropped out of school, never cared about homework, never cared to work hard to become a better person, expect to go into wal-mart and get payed the same as someone who did? This is a false expectation and has a bad impact on the market overall.

                  D: I agree that gov should not be able to tell the companies that they can't unionionize, but I also think they should not be able to tell them they have to. Again, self-responsiblity, if you dont like a company for it's work-ethic, dont work there. Better yourself so that you can work somewhere else.

                  C: I see where you are coming from, that unionization might appear to equalize the market force. But I believe it doesn't. Instead, it punishes the market by making the rest of us have to subsidize complacency and artificial wages.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 12:16 pm ET)
                    6 1
                    I have to quibble about your false premise on one leg of your journey toward corporate facism. If you and I are digging the same ditch and you are over qualified for the post and I am underqualified , but we both are are in the same ditch laboring, you are inherently expected to be compensated differently? School makes you a BETTER person? Perhaps qualified for a more lucrative career is in line, but a working stiff is less due a living wage? Boy oh boy did you just Republican your pants sancheuz.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 12:37 pm ET)
                      1 6
                      I have to quibble about your false premise on one leg of your journey toward corporate facism. If you and I are digging the same ditch and you are over qualified for the post and I am underqualified , but we both are are in the same ditch laboring


                      You're analogy is wrong. If we are in the same ditch working, we should be getting paid the same no matter what my "qualifications" are or aren't. A more realistic analogy to your reasoning is that the one working on the ditch, should be getting paid the same as the one with through risk, experience, sleepless nights, started up the ditch digging company.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 12:49 pm ET)
                        6  
                        Your analogy is actually worse. Nobody is asking to be paid the same as the company owner. What unions ask is compensation relative to the actual work they put in. After all, workers are the ones doing the rest of the work and giving to the company their time and life. The least a company should do is pay them in a way they can actually live without worrying that if they lose their job the next day, they would become destitute.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 12:50 pm ET)
                        5  
                        I guess when you live in a fantasy any made up scnario will support you. lol. Come back to the real world.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 1:17 pm ET)
                        6  
                        In today's world, the guy that started up the ditch digging company has taken his well-deserved profit when he sold the company, which was bought by a capital leveraging company who couldn't care less about digging ditches -- they just bought it to squeeze the profit out of it.

                        Where the guy that started up the company had pride in his business and the quality of work done by the people he employed, the new company only cares about how much profit it can make for investors, so it reduces the labor force to unsafe levels, sources inferior equipment and materials, cuts corners on safety procedures and reduces wages until it's only got people working for it who can't get jobs anywhere else.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 1:26 pm ET)
                        5  
                        Do you believe workers in a union are compensated like CEO's? I fully concur that that an owner of a business is going to make more, but to allow unionization just doesn't pass the smell test for the commie-booger bear that Cons level at it. My father was union and we had a middle class life that included Ins. and a living wage, nothing more.I have all my adult life for the most part in right to work states, and I often went without essentials not to mention any frills like insurance. I like the notion of workers able to shake the money tree now and again, without fearing lay-off or retribution.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 3:12 pm ET)
                        6  
                        "A more realistic analogy to your reasoning is that the one working on the ditch, should be getting paid the same as the one with through risk, experience, sleepless nights, started up the ditch digging company."

                        No, that is your hyperbolic misunderstanding of what labor and progressives want; FAIRNESS.

                        Nobody says the owner of a company should make the same as the laborers. That is a lie you tell yourself in order to justify your HATE. That is a lie that you tell yourself in order to justify your MEANNESS. That is a lie that you tell yourself in order to cover your IGNORANCE.

                        Do we have a problem with a Fortune 500 CEO making 300 times what their workers do? YOU BET YOUR ARSE! When CEO's "only" made 40-50 times what their employees made, unemployment was low, middle-incomes were rising and the disparity between the rich an poor was moderate. When CEOs paid 50% of their wages in taxes instead of 18%, we had safe roads and bridges. We were the leader of the world in health and technology. Today, middle income wages have been stagnant for 30 years. Union membership is way down. Income disparity in the US is now at third world levels. The US ranks 34th in infant mortality rate (behind such notable countries as: Cuba and Croatia).

                        Yeah, we need to do more to de-unionize the country. The rich don't have everything yet.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by GreenLantern (September 06, 2011 8:22 pm ET)
                          3  
                          Very well said, Chazmanr. If I could "thumbs up" you ten times I would. The facts speak VOLUMES here! You quote the facts that prove the progressive point! They are also Christian VALUES! I argue these points constantly with hate-wingers and teabaggers and all they can come up with is it is "punishing" billionaires to pay a tiny percentage of their opulence to their country, but "fair" to take food out of seniors, poor children, and the disadvantaged mouths.
                          That is the modern day repug mindset. It is disgusting, but they get faux and limbug etc. to lie to them to justify their ugliness so they don't feel so guilty about it!
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 12:18 pm ET)
                    5  
                    Where do you live sancheuz? It most certainly is not in the real world. Working hard to improve yourself? You have proof that this is the cause of 10% unemployment. If you don't like the company work effect don't work there? Again what world do you live in? Workers work because they have to. Would you be for allowing those workers who quit because they didn't like the work environment to collect unemployment? I think not. Your Randian beliefs are dully noted and in no way verified by reality.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2011 12:22 pm ET)
                    5  
                    The government doesn't tell any company's employees that they must unionize. It's a democratic process by the workers to decide if they unionize or not.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 1:20 pm ET)
                    4  
                    I agree that gov should not be able to tell the companies that they can't unionionize, but I also think they should not be able to tell them they have to.


                    Companies don't unionize. Workers do. No government tells workers that they MUST unionize, but many allow companies to tell workers that they CAN'T.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 12:03 pm ET)
                6  
                Wal-Mart and you have nerve to talk about "free" market. There is no "free" markets since the rise of nation states. Wal-Mart is a multi-national monopoly and monopolies rule the present day. You act like people have a choice over which job to choose. I think the need to eat and house one self takes precedence.Why shouldn't workers have the right to come together and organize around issues for the betterment and livlihood. Unrealistic pressures? What like "livable wages"? Safe and clean working conditions? Vacation and sick leave? Take your Randian fantasies and shove it. Even she didn't live by them.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 12:32 pm ET)
                  1 8
                  You act like people have a choice over which job to choose.


                  Yes they do. Don't give me this bull. Hard work is all it takes.

                  Why shouldn't workers have the right to come together and organize around issues for the betterment and livlihood


                  Never said they can't. Just said that at this point they are doing more harm then good.

                  Unrealistic pressures? What like "livable wages"?


                  No, paying someone more then what the true market forces stipulate that they should get paid. That puts a burden on the "rest" of us.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 12:46 pm ET)
                    8  
                    Hard work is all it takes? Where is your proof that people are not working hard or trying to improve themselves? Where is your proof that Wal-Mart workers are not educated or drop-outs? Workers coming together is harming the economy but multi-nationals/monopoies aren't? CEO's earn 400x more than their workers please explain how they work 400x harder.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 12:51 pm ET)
                      1 7
                      Where is your proof that people are not working hard or trying to improve themselves?


                      I'm not saying they are not.. you are the one with little faith and confidence on the personal spirit for achievement. You are the one doubting that anyone can "better" themselves on their own

                      CEO's earn 400x more than their workers


                      Nobody is forcing the comapanies to pay them that much. It's all being moved by market forces. A position of great responsibility usually comes with great recompensation.

                      not all companies are comprised of greedy 400x paid CEOs by the way. Most employers in this country are the small mom and pops companies who work hard to make an honest living.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 12:55 pm ET)
                        5  
                        "Success" is dependent mostly on luck. There are no market forces that dominate or guide it. There are many people who work harder than anybody doing the jobs that require a higher stress on the body (picking fruit, cleaning up after our $#!t (literally and figuratively)) yet get paid the least.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 1:00 pm ET)
                        5  
                        I have faith in people achieving but we don't live in a fairy-tale world where all is well and if we just work hard and play by the rules everything will be fine. Market forces? What market forces bailed Wall St. out and allowed them to continue to pay these exhorbitant bonueses while they layed off workers? I've heard this mom and pop fantasy repeated by you Randians often but have yet to see proof of this. Care to provide any? Oh and what are the giant stores like Wal-Mart doing to your mom and pop stores?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 1:10 pm ET)
                          1 6
                          A) I did not and still don't agree with the bail-outs for the few wall street companies that got'em. Though I must admit that had the bail-outs not been handed, the collapse would have been a lot worst.

                          B)How important are small businesses? link

                          C)
                          Oh and what are the giant stores like Wal-Mart doing to your mom and pop stores?
                          What will unionization do to help out the matter?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 1:14 pm ET)
                            5 1
                            "What will unionization do to help out the matter?"--sancheuz

                            Change the market forces.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 1:20 pm ET)
                            5 1
                            A) You just conceded there is no "free" market.
                            B) many of what you consider smnall businesses are not.
                            C)Yailed to explain what Wal-Mart is doing to your mom and pop shops. I guess because you'd have to say they are runninig them out of business. What will unionization do? How about giving the workers a tool to use against the crushing onslaught of the multi-nationals.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2011 2:15 pm ET)
                            4 1
                            Most of those "small businesses" aren't mom and pop type operations. A small business in the U.S. is defined as one that has less than 500 employees and makes less than $5 million in net profits. This includes most franchised restaraunts.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by chazmanr (September 06, 2011 3:17 pm ET)
                              4 1
                              It also includes a lot of rich people who have incorporated themselves to avoid taxes. Cindy McCain is a small business. She doesn't make anything. She doesn't employee anyone. She is incorporated to minimize her exposure on her income from her family's booze distributorship. If you reduce her taxes, not one new job will be created. If you increase her taxes, not one job will be lost.
                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 1:07 pm ET)
                        5  
                        Do you have anything to substantiate your assertions aside from Atlas Shrugged?

                        At least you are finally admitting that you're in La-La Land with your comment about faith in personal spirit, since it is physically impossible for all people to get or create their own job. All you have left to support your position becomes apparent: your imagination.

                        Hey, sancheuz, what market forces were in place for 3 decades, post WWII, that had our country with the most prosperous middle class in the history of the world? Laissez Faire economy? Low corporate/income taxes? Little to no union representation? Low import tariffs? Please tell us why you support exactly the opposite of what made our country great.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 1:16 pm ET)
                          1 8
                          what market forces were in place for 3 decades, post WWII, that had our country with the most prosperous middle class in the history of the world? Laissez Faire economy? Low corporate/income taxes? Little to no union representation? Low import tariffs?


                          -A huge amount of resources
                          -A huge lower class stepping into the middle
                          -A huge amount of resources
                          -Freedom of entrepreneurship
                          -Hard work
                          -Did I mention resources?


                          Please tell us why you support exactly the opposite of what made our country great.


                          If you show me how you reached your conclusion
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 1:28 pm ET)
                            6  
                            You can't be serious sancheuz.
                            A huge amount of resources and government spending. The GI bill(more government spending)
                            A thriving and growing union movement. SS and unemployment insurance and yes Welfare. Jobs created due to the government. Hoover Dam,electrical grid,the creation of the interstate. The retooling of industry from war to commoditiy production spurred on by the creation of those jobs along with hard work and did I say unionization? Wake-up dude and join the real world.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 1:35 pm ET)
                              1 6
                              -hoover dam was pre-wwII
                              -SS and unemployment insurance was what lead to this country's prosperity? You have it backwards, prosperity led to SS and welfare.
                              -I do agree with the huge post ware industrialization.

                              I do agree with that infrastructure spending by government leads to job creation, but at this point, there is not much money for this gov to spend. In the past, we'd borrow the money and use it for that purpose. Today, we are borrowing the money and using it for the SS, welfare, medicaid, food stamps, unemployment, ect ect.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 1:54 pm ET)
                                6  
                                Today, we are borrowing the money and using it for the SS, welfare, medicaid, food stamps, unemployment, ect ect. sancheuz

                                SS and unemployment compensation were the results of unions fighting for them. I guess you just skipped the roles of unions in creating a viable and thriving middle-class. Remember the Lincoln quote,it was labor that created wealth and capital.
                                Today we are spending on two wars and tax-cuts to the wealthiest 2% of the country that controls over 50% of the wealth. That is what led to this debt problem. SS is solvent for the next 30 yrs. and can made more secure with some minor tweaks. Medicaid spending is rising but still more effecient than private health insurance which is the main reason for the rising cost. Food stamps and unemployment add very little to the deficit and can be fixed by creating jobs. The main drivers of this present crisis was the two-wars off the budget along with the tax-cuts,unpaid for prescription drug program written by the pharmaceuticals and the financial meltdown.
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2011 1:56 pm ET)
                                7  
                                You have it backwards, prosperity led to SS and welfare.


                                No, you are the one who has it backwards. The fact that we were not prospering and that the market crashed is what led to the establishment of SS and welfare.
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 2:16 pm ET)
                                5 1
                                "Today, we are borrowing the money and using it for the SS,.."--sancheuz

                                Social Security is completely paid for, no borrowing done now. It is currently in a $2 trillion surplus, which is why, as congero6189599 points out, it is solvent for decades to come. We are actually borrowing money FROM SS, you have it so unbelievably backwards. That's why, when that surplus fact was brought to light, the R's dismissed the $2 trillion as just IOU's. The cash is there, they don't want you to think it is.

                                That's why the R's, the especially greedy ones, want to destroy SS and privatize; there is that immensely successful pot-o-gold sitting there, and they want those trillions so badly, that last big hunk of change to steal that the Federal Government has.

                                And you buy into the lie that SS is a drain on our economy.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 5:19 pm ET)
                                  3 1
                                  "Today, we are borrowing the money and using it for the SS,.."--sancheuz

                                  Doesn't this tell us all we need to know about sanchez? He doesn't even know the most basic ideas of what he is talking about. He is merely regurgitating lies. We are borrowing money and using it on SS? That is complete ignorance. Laughable, sad ignorance.

                                  This is yet another guy who has been tricked by some silly Austrian economists who choose to act as if the French revolution never occurred. He actually thinks SS came because America was so flush with money during the Depression. It would be funny if it weren't so sad. Grow up, sanchez.
                                  Report Abuse
                                • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 5:33 pm ET)
                                  2  
                                  Don't expect a response on this one, yolks. Reality has a way of destroying the debate of someone who only repeats what they have been told to say.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by yoiksaway (September 07, 2011 7:39 pm ET)
                                       
                                    Maybe you're right about no response, but I don't think the reality presented will change what sancheuz says the next time elsewhere. That would require an emotional shift away from the unfounded fear of government or the hope that success will follow a hundred-dollar tax cut, or fear of being wrong, or whatever. That shift only tends to happen among those one trusts. No way does sancheuz trust us, even having run out of talking-point ammo. It's really hard to loosen that emotional grip. We've seen it before..
                                    Report Abuse
                          • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 1:41 pm ET)
                            6  
                            Name those resources that are now apparently dwindled.

                            Explain how the lower class moved to the middle. Magic? "Hard work" is not sufficient; you have to explain the market forces.

                            "Freedom of entrepeneurship": what is that and apparently it is gone today, yes?

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 2:17 pm ET)
                              1 5
                              -Resources in energy and materials. A few are dwindling, others are not being used as much, some we don't have a great a need for no more.

                              -As more ppl stepped worked into middle class, more wealth was created. As the majority of ppl stepped into the middle class, the acceleration of wealth decreased. Our system is based on growth.

                              -What I meant by the freedoms of E. is the in this country to create. It is not "gone" today, but many in the left see this very "entrepreneurial" spirit as the cause to evil and as something that must be controlled and heavily taxed, and therefore limited.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by sancheuz (September 06, 2011 2:19 pm ET)
                                1 6
                                correction to third point:

                                -What I meant by the freedoms of E. refers to the freedom in this country for one to create and free enterprise. It is not "gone" today, but many in the left see this very "entrepreneurial" spirit as the cause to evil and as something that must be controlled and heavily taxed, and therefore limited.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2011 2:22 pm ET)
                                  6  
                                  No one on the left, middle or right think the "entrepreneurial spirit" is evil. It is GREED that is evil, there is a difference. Heavily taxed? Are you freakin kidding me? Taxes are paid to pay for the cost of our great country. It has nothing to do with punishing anyone.
                                  Report Abuse
                                • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 2:35 pm ET)
                                  5  
                                  Wow, what a complete bail.

                                  You named no resources, and failing that, you don't relate the trend of resources to today's waning middle class. Apparently is was a major factor then, but not now.

                                  "Acceleration of wealth"? That would mean that our prosperity is completely unsustainable.

                                  "E" is not what the left sees as evil. Who told you that joke? What is evil: the success of E not paying America back for providing the platform to be successful. Get it? If the hard-working entrepreneur thinks that he deserves every penny he makes, he's a thief, because he owes America for helping to make him successful. That's why we have taxes.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by mikehuck76 (September 06, 2011 5:23 pm ET)
                                    2 1
                                    He doesn't know. He is merely saying what someone else told him to say. He knows absolutely nothing about even basic American history. Hopefully, he is still in junior high school. Because adults should at least understand basic history.

                                    SS was created because we were so wealthy during the Depression? He has no idea how the "greatest generation" moved into the middle class and seems to even admit it. He has no clue that the "greatest generation" was funded by deficit spending and government subsidizing. What a moron.

                                    Report Abuse
                              • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 2:33 pm ET)
                                3  
                                -As more ppl stepped worked into middle class, more wealth was created. As the majority of ppl stepped into the middle class, the acceleration of wealth decreased. Our system is based on growth.----sanchuez

                                Did you read that contradictory nonsense before you posted it?
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by datruthfarmer (September 07, 2011 2:45 am ET)
                                1 1
                                sancheuz,

                                Do you realize that your entire argument reads like an advocate for Social Darwinism?

                                Report Abuse
                          • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 2:02 pm ET)
                            3  
                            Please tell us why you support exactly the opposite of what made our country great.

                            "If you show me how you reached your conclusion"--sancheuz

                            Here, here, here

                            Your anti-union stance is diametrically opposed to what made a prosperous middle class and a great America. Explain why you support the opposite.

                            Other things that made our country great:
                            progressive taxation
                            import tariffs
                            progressive social advancement
                            democratic representation

                            Now's your chance, sancheuz, state your position for all to see. What is the structure of your ideal America? Take some or all those variables into account, or more for that matter. You are now in the spotlight, and at this point, all I expect is windy generalizations of your description, where everybody works hard or we have more freedom or something.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2011 2:12 pm ET)
                        4 1
                        There is no such a thing as "Market forces" It is a myth.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Chameo (September 06, 2011 3:10 pm ET)
                        2 1
                        You should check your figures on that. Most employers in this country may be small mom and pops, but most employees are employed by companies who net more than $1 million a year. That's net -- after all expenses, including salaries and benefits, are paid. Those aren't mom and pops. That's a fiction pushed by the RW Repub machine who define "small businesses" as those who employ up to 500 workers.

                        The last figure I read was that mom and pops -- businesses with less than 20 employees, which is how most people view a mom and pop -- actually employ about 18% of the employees in this country -- about 21.5 million people. Companies with more than 500 employees employ more than 56 million, while those who employ between 100 and 500 employees -- medium-sized businesses that are considered "small businesses" by the SBA -- employ about 41.8 million.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 1:13 pm ET)
                    6  
                    A position of great responsibility usually comes with great recompensation? sancheuz


                    Lets not forget who pulls the cart and who actually makes the profits.

                    "In an 1861 address to Congress, Abraham Lincoln said, “Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”*
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2011 2:09 pm ET)
                    2 1
                    "The Market" doesn't determine wages, employers do.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by yoiksaway (September 06, 2011 2:21 pm ET)
                      2  
                      Good to challenge that abstract. The market is people making decisions. It's became a stock phrase to avoid assigning responsibility.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 2:40 pm ET)
                        1  
                        This is getting annoying. Everytime I post have to log back in. Does anyone else have that problem?

                        It's became a stock phrase to avoid assigning responsibility. ---yoiksaway


                        that is exactly what it is. As long as you can blame the unemployment problem on people not looking for work(unemplyment insurance),or not working hard etc.,etc., it relieves capital of the responsibility for dealing with it's structural problems. You are poor because you are lazy, not because you work 2-3 jobs and still can't make ends meet and gas has gone up along with everything else. Pull yourself up by your socks,if you have any.
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 12:56 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Ayn Rand was hideously addicted to amphetamines, but don't all psychotic drug addled writers deserve their due? Who would lead the Tea Baggers or the Third Reich to prominence if not for chemically enhanced nut-buckets? Stay awake long enough and your CAT will start making sense.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (September 06, 2011 1:03 pm ET)
                    2  
                    Don't forget she also was a atheist who despised those weak followers of "God."
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 1:52 pm ET)
                      3  
                      It has to be tough to be a Tea Bagger, who do I have to despise this week? Ayn Rand was probably not God's best work anyhow.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by danielsangeo (September 06, 2011 6:16 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Atheists like Rand tick me off to no end, and I'm an atheist. For one reason:

                      People think that is what atheism is: Anti-religion.

                      Atheism has not, is not, nor will ever be anti-religion. Some atheists are anti-religion but some atheists have mustaches, too. Anti-religion is not a defining factor for atheism.

                      Okay, sorry for the interruption. :)
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by yoiksaway (September 07, 2011 5:40 pm ET)
                1 1
                "Someone who goes to apply at these [low-wage] places should know what they are getting into. If one wants something better then a min wage or risky job, then one can do much to improve themselves and reach higher"--sancheuz

                So, after lengthy discussion with sancheuz on unionization and the middle class, with sancheuz ultimately having to bail, I will assume that the escape does not have to do with lack of time to comment, but inability to respond due to lack of information. This will be a great resource for future discussion with those of that ilk. It's an example, a test case, of how a person supports the idea of a society that doesn't exist and never will exist. Get educated, sancheuz, we're rooting for you.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by barscotch9441 (September 06, 2011 10:37 pm ET)
          1 1
          So you disagree with Sean Hannity's repetition of "class warfare" any time top bracket tax rates are mentioned? He's just grabbed Hannity's wording (which is an abuse of the term "warfare", by the way) and taken it back.

          If it is class warfare, though, Conservica shot first.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (September 06, 2011 10:08 am ET)
      5 3
      A STRONG AMERICA, UNIONIZE EVERYONE,the right wingers, beckie, kkklannity & limpags, would overflow their pants...
      (pants on the ground for sure, for sure)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by JP (September 06, 2011 3:54 pm ET)
        2 1
        beckie, kkklannity & limpags are already union members. It's just that they won't admit it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by giveitrevolution2012 (September 06, 2011 10:11 am ET)
         
      I think Ill call Obama a SOB...oh wait but then ill be considered a racist hmmm
      Report Abuse
    • Author by xan (September 06, 2011 10:23 am ET)
         
      Maybe someone can help me out, can't find the piece that blasts MSNBS's Shultz for editing out Perry's comments about the "black cloud" being the debt and not Obama. Thx.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Scupper Joe (September 06, 2011 12:23 pm ET)
         
      When the right wing echo sphere has to over reach SO much on edited misinformation then we know they're toast.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by scooter51 (September 06, 2011 12:39 pm ET)
      4  
      are we surprised by this? Not at all.

      will the spineless Democrats distance themselves from Hoffa? without a doubt.

      should they back him up instead and call out Fox for it's lies? You bet, but don't hold your breath.

      I have become so cynical that I cannot even believe in the decency of the American people any longer. We get what we deserve. We are a country where the ONLY thing that matters is the bottom line. ALL HAIL THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR. Sad, but way too true.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hope4change (September 06, 2011 12:55 pm ET)
           
        It would seem that it has come to pass where this country needs to split up. Conservatives living in their section and the liberals in theirs. I've seen less acrimony during heated religious debates.

        One vote here for dividing the country and be done with it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Roni (September 06, 2011 1:15 pm ET)
         
      Let me see if I have this right...We're supposed to believe that FoxNews (and now CNN) fabricated this story, yet Media Matters fails to substantiate their claim by providing actual video documentation of the statement? Surely, in this era of politico one-ups-manship, a video of the speech is available. We need to ask ourselves, why did the writer feel it unnecessary to include that video with this article?

      Let's not get ourselves riled up and start choosing sides on this yet. Clearly, something doesn't quite pass the smell test here.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ag fresh 88 (September 06, 2011 1:50 pm ET)
         
      When you call a group "son of a bitches" and say "Obama, here is your army" how is that not violent?

      Haha stupid libs. How quickly you hide your desire to ruin the country.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by divediva (September 06, 2011 1:55 pm ET)
         
      We understood the context...that's not the point... where's the civility that everyone on the left demanded..oh wait..demanded from the right only... Did those targets on the map really inspire Jared L to shoot Gabby Giffords, probably not, but this kind of rhetoric from dirtbag Jimmy makes me think of a meat grinder...oh..wait..(civility, remember civility) reminds me that union leaders like this are ruining this country and the good name of every good union worker! they are figuratively tarring and feathering ALL unions...
      Keep talking!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WandaLou (September 06, 2011 2:01 pm ET)
         
      Really. You "demand" that the president do this? Wow. I wish I had that kind of power. :)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mauman (September 06, 2011 2:52 pm ET)
      2 3
      Fox News, the right-wing bloggers, and Rush Limbaugh are the wealth creators. That's because they are in the private sector, not the government sector. This is wealth you're looking at.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 3:11 pm ET)
        7 1
        Hustler magazine, meth-labs and mafia hitmen are in the private sector as well, and all provide goods and services that people will pay for. This is wealth you're looking at. Government is just the reins on this wild horse that is capitalism, not the glue factory fancy- pants.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mauman (September 06, 2011 7:22 pm ET)
        3  
        I guess my sarcasm didn't come through.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by heehee..santorum (September 06, 2011 9:27 pm ET)
          4  
          oops, I'm guessing mine did........you were very convincing.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mauman (September 06, 2011 10:47 pm ET)
            2 1
            I'll just be clear, without any sarcasm.

            Distorting what a person says in order to mislead people is not wealth. It's called bearing false witness. And it's morally wrong.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 07, 2011 9:16 am ET)
                 
              gotcha, but venturing into the realm of morality is unexplored territory for our Right-Wing reality benders.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by WoodyGuth3 (September 06, 2011 3:09 pm ET)
         
      Rightwingers, take a deep breath. Jimmy Hoffa said, "Take these son-of-a-bitches out" by voting them out of office, but maybe he meant take them out to Starbucks or let them outside to go to the bathroom? It's not quite like Arizona's Jesse Kelly's “Get on Target for Victory in November. Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office. Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly” fundraiser! http://firedoglake.com/2011/01/08/giffords-opponent-jesse-kelly-held-june-event-to-shoot-a-fully-automatic-m16-to-get-on-target-and-remove-gabrielle-giffords/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnbrown (September 06, 2011 4:03 pm ET)
      2 1
      I don't think President Obama has to answer to that scummo Bolling about anything.As for Tokyo Rose of Fox News Megyn Kelly and Dana Loesch they seem to have short memories.Don't they remember tea party protesters at Obama rallies bringing assault weapons or supporters at tea party rallies carrying signs threatening to bring their guns to the Washington if things don't change the way they like it?And how about their unruly behavior at those town hall meetings?Who are the ones that are really uncivil Megyn?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Advocate6 (September 06, 2011 5:19 pm ET)
         
      Barbarians at the gate...lol
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Advocate6 (September 06, 2011 5:21 pm ET)
         
      Those SOB's!! =)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Buckeye22 (September 06, 2011 7:04 pm ET)
         
      You people are idiots. How, exactly, was this video "doctored"? He clearly said, "Let's take these sons of bitches out." Which part of that is doctored?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by abrady (September 06, 2011 9:07 pm ET)
      2 1
      “I’m thinking about killing Michael Moore,” conservative political commentator Glenn Beck said flatly.

      Oh, no. Fox does not condone or support violence.

      Another set of FOX lies; different day; same strategy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cjxxxjackel (September 06, 2011 11:27 pm ET)
           
        The left has used these kind of tactics for years without hearing a peep and now all asuden because it's cool to hate republicans it's not ok for fox to do this, typical double standard of the leftist agenda.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by s v SunshineDaydream (September 06, 2011 9:20 pm ET)
         
      Dana Loesch. How can you lie so blatently about a quote taken completely ouy of context, and expect to be taken seriously. Hoffa said "in November" in a plain reference to election day. Do you suppose he meant lets all wait 2 months and then physically attach teaparty dolts. C'MON, show us your more than just a pretty face. Show some integrity. At least listen to the whole quote before blathering your drool.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by biker999 (September 06, 2011 9:35 pm ET)
         
      This ain't hard. The people who attributed the Tuscan shooting to hatred and violence stirred up by a map with targets on congressional districts must condemn Hoffa's speech using the words, 'let's take these sons of bitches out.'"

      If they do not, they are not only pure, lowly political animals, but loathsome hypocrites of the most vile and evil sort.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kdfreed (September 06, 2011 11:01 pm ET)
      1 1
      Who wouldn't enjoy the spectacle of watching Fox "Spews" blow itself up?

      The harder we fight back against corporatist stooges like the tea party and its reich-wing cheerleaders, the wetter their pants get and the creepier Fox behaves. Pretty soon they'll be telling us that "the Statue of Liberty is a demonic idol"...

      [VIDEO] Rick Perry's "The Response":

      http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/rick-perry-partners-apostle-who-thinks-statue-liberty-demonic-idol


      Report Abuse
    • Author by datruthfarmer (September 07, 2011 4:10 am ET)
      2 1
      That Dana Loesch is such a liar she stands out in the Fox crowd.

      Channeling the mob drama, "The Untouchables," Mr. Obama said in reference to the general election rumble with the Republicans: "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun. Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans." The comment drew some laughs and applause. Obama said this at a Philadelphia fundraiser.

      Obama made the comment in the context of warning donors that the general election campaign against McCain could get ugly. "They’re going to try to scare people". "They’re going to try to say that 'that Obama is a scary guy'.

      Here is Palin's reload comment came at a time when several Democratic lawmakers who voted for the healthcare bill have received personal threats to their personal safety:

      "Commonsense Conservatives & lovers of America: Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD! Pls see my Facebook page."

      Here is some rancid cream from the top:
      Fox News leads the violence

      Can you say False Equivalency?


      Here are more examples of violence from the Right.


      Here is still more violence for the Right Wing.

      Here are two Conservative Commentators proving to be completely unaware of the world around him.

      Mike Savage:

      The Children's Minds Are Being Raped By The Homosexual Mafia

      President Obama Is A Neo-Marxist Fascist Dictator In The Making.

      Hawaii Will Have Cannibalism Again If They Kick The White Man Out.

      Mark Levin:

      The Klan's Agenda" And "The Radical Left's Agenda ... Are Pretty Similar

      God Put Me Here For A Reason ... To Beat The Hell Out Of Liberals.

      Obama is like The New Black Panthers, Who Talked About Killing -- Murdering -- White Babies.

      Now for those Michelle Bachmann insights:

      Carbon dioxide is portrayed as harmful. But there isn't even one study that can be produced that shows that carbon dioxide is a harmful gas.

      There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel Prizes, who believe in intelligent design.

      I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back. Thomas Jefferson told us having a revolution every now and then is a good thing, and the people -- we the people -- are going to have to fight back hard if we're not going to lose our country.

      Went on a walk and, through prayer, discovered that God wanted her to introduce an amendment.

      Charles Koch:

      "We have Saddam Hussein, this is the Mother of All Wars we've got in the next 18 months. For the life or death of this country."

      Words cannot describe how disgusting Fox News and these people are.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by HP Loveshaft (September 07, 2011 9:54 am ET)
        1 1
        Dude! You cite...blogs...as "news"? Really?!?

        And if you're going to call someone on their words, at least QUOTE THEM. Oh, that would be too honest and require a little work, wouldn't it?

        Damn. This website is like magnet that attracts liberals positively drunk on neo-comm Kool Aid. It's called "thinking". You do it yourself. You don't let blogs think for you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (September 07, 2011 10:08 am ET)
          2 1
          And if you're going to call someone on their words, at least QUOTE THEM. Oh, that would be too honest and require a little work, wouldn't it?-----HP loveshaft


          Lol. That is what this whole thread was about and what Faux didn't do accurately. Thanks foolio now follow your own advice.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by datruthfarmer (September 07, 2011 12:43 pm ET)
          1 1
          Darn, forgot to put quotation marks around all of the quotes so Shaft of Love could see them.

          Why do the same people who trust the science behind the airplane they fly in, deny the science that proves their bigotry?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by yoiksaway (September 07, 2011 5:54 pm ET)
            1
          "neo-comm"--HP

          Hmm. Stricken by my inability to think, please, define that term.

          Don't be citing any blogs now..
          Report Abuse
    • Author by HP Loveshaft (September 07, 2011 9:50 am ET)
      1 3
      This story and the comment thread are a perfect example of why you can't reason with the far left who get their news from opinions.

      Context does N-O-T-H-I-N-G to vindicate this comment from how offensive it is. We know this was a metaphor. But, it's an inflammatory metaphor, and vulgar to boot. Hardly something someone "Presidential" would give a green light to.

      Face it, you pants-wetting selective outrage neo-comm leftists were the ones who repeatedly demanded more civility. You can't call off the dogs simply because one of your own is being uncivil, and the President supports it. Stop being hypocrites and be consistent. I dare you.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 10:56 am ET)
        2 1
        Context does N-O-T-H-I-N-G to vindicate this comment from how offensive it is.


        Thanks for admitting you're not capable of understanding the subject. Some people are shy about that.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Persia (September 07, 2011 11:06 am ET)
        2 1
        Another phony outrage troll. Thanks for the laughs.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 07, 2011 12:01 pm ET)
          2 1
          I really wonder how somebody can read this item, read all of the comments, and still tell themselves that the consistently and deliberately omitted words have no effect on the context.

          Obvious follow-up; Why were they edited out ?

          Are they too stupid to ask that question, or are they just BS-ing, hoping that others are too stupid to see it?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck76 (September 07, 2011 2:39 pm ET)
        2 1
        I love it when a right-winger wets his pants about a term like SOBs while complaining about someone else wetting their pants. The far-right has become so consumed by pure emotion over facts that they can actually cry about nonsense in the very same post while creating the idea that someone else is crying about nonsense. Amazing.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by williamjacobs (September 07, 2011 3:20 pm ET)
         
      Footage of Hoffa with the voting line would have been nice for easy side-by-side comparison.


      I can't ask conservatives to click multiple links. Their attention span isn't that good after years of watching Fox.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Iowaminuteman (September 07, 2011 4:57 pm ET)
         
      Oh how the left LIES as if the American people haven't heard the WHOLE VIOLENT RANT by Jimmie Hoffa Jr.! THIS is exactly why the Tea Party has become so strong and stronger by the day as MORE AND MORE people join the movement to take our country back and RETURN it to its founding principles. It is beyond comprehension why the Socialist left HATES our Constitution so much! It is dare I say UN-AMERICAN!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by UnionThug (September 07, 2011 6:17 pm ET)
         
      I'm in a union and I know exactly what he meant. SEIU anyone?
      He (Hoffa) condones violence against people that disagree with him. I've seen this type of behavior before this incident.

      I find this type of behavior by unions disgraceful and harmful. For Media Matters to say it was anything less than a threat and an insult is dishonest.

      Obama's silence is the most telling.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wirenut94 (September 07, 2011 8:37 pm ET)
         
      I've got an idea! Put cry baby Boehner and Hoffa in a closed room and let 'em hash it out! lol I hope they all hold their breath waiting for that apology...Riiiight! Don't cowtow to these wimps Jimmy, we're behind ya, Bro!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LittleRascal (September 08, 2011 11:58 am ET)
         
      It seems completely ridiculous that to tear down others or specific News Media to promote ones agenda is effective. What is important is to seek the truth with no spin or conjecture. Unfortunately the intellectual capacity of those that think left of center is lacking when it comes to the direction of this country or its politics in general. Facts do not support your position and the liberal arguments are founded purely on emotion. Obama needs to be removed from office in 2012 not because of his race or the shape of his ears, its because the premise of his and all liberal thinking is flawed. Socialism never has, or never will work. How many times must it be tried and fail in history before the hammer sinks into the small brain of the lefty.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.