About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

NRA's LaPierre Reveals "Obama Conspiracy" To Fool Gun Owners, Repeal Second Amendment

September 26, 2011 10:41 am ET by Matt Gertz

For more Media Matters coverage of gun violence and extremism, visit our Gun Facts microsite.

According to National Rifle Association executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, the Obama administration's lack of action on gun control issues only proves just how diabolically anti-gun they are.

In a speech Friday at Florida's version of the Conservative Political Action Conference, LaPierre explained how by not pushing for new gun laws, Obama actually revealed that he is engaged in a secret plan to "lull gun owners to sleep" so that they would not vote him out of office in 2012. LaPierre claimed that Obama's "strategy" is to "get re-elected" and then "erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights."

LaPIERRE: [I]n public, [President Obama will] remind us that he's put off calls from his party to renew the old Clinton [assault weapons] gun ban, he hasn't pushed for new gun control laws, and he'll even say he looked the other way when Congress passed a couple of minor pro-gun bills by huge majorities. The president will offer the Second Amendment lip service and hit the campaign trail saying he's actually been good for the Second Amendment.

But it's a big fat stinking lie, just like all the other lies that have come out of this corrupt administration. It's all part -- it's all part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment in our country. [...]

Before the President was even sworn into office, they met and they hatched a conspiracy of public deception to try to guarantee his re-election in 2012. [...]

And Obama himself is no fool.  So when he got elected, they concocted a scheme to stay away from the gun issue, lull gun owners to sleep, and play us for fools in 2012. Well, gun owners are not fools, and we are not fooled. We see the president's strategy crystal clear: get re-elected, and with no other re-elections to worry about, get busy dismantling and destroying our firearms freedom. Erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights and exorcise it from the U.S. Constitution. That's their agenda.

LaPierre did not explain in his speech why the leader of a group whose top priority is defeating President Obama in 2012 would be made privy to this secret plan. Nor did he explain how Obama planned to repeal the Second Amendment will a Congress that passes "pro-gun bills by huge majorities."

NRA leaders and advocates have been so hard up for evidence that President Obama is anti-gun that they have been citing an Obama-implemented rule that requires gun dealers in some states to report multiple sales of assault weapons to the ATF. That rule would not prevent a single person from getting a firearm.

The NRA's hysterical claim that President Obama plans to repeal the Second Amendment is a natural byproduct of the Supreme Court's finding in District of Columbia v. Heller that the amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. Until then, the group could offer the similarly conspiratorial claim that gun bans and confiscation were right around the corner. With those ideas taken off the table even in theory by Heller, NRA has moved on to even more ludicrous conspiracies.

The gun lobby will never stop portaying sensible gun control policies as the first step toward "destroying our firearms freedom"; now, they're portaying no expansion of gun control in the same way. After all, the NRA needs funding, and it's not the anniversary of 9/11 every day.

(h/t Crooks and Liars)

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (September 26, 2011 10:46 am ET)
      9  
      This guy does know how the amendment process to the Constitution works right?

      Even IF Obama wanted to do those things, there is no way, no WAY that any Congress either current, future, or past for that matter would go about trying to revoke the 2nd Amendment. It just wouldn't happen. Not to mention the right to own firearms is well codified into US law by many different SCOTUS rulings over the years. I mean that's a battle that even if he wanted to fight it, has been lost many times over already.

      But, hey, those jackmonkeys thought that when Obama took office, he'd be coming after their guns. That's why there was ammo and weapons shortages after he was elected. Do you know what good comes of what LaPierre (sounds French, he cannot be trusted) is saying now?

      Yeah, MORE huge gun sales, because these people ARE fools if they believe what he is saying. There is no evidence of Obama being tough on gun control, at all. It is kind of not a major priority on his agenda.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SeanSeaman (September 26, 2011 10:54 am ET)
           
        I am shocked--SHOCKED--that the guy who's job is to represent gun manufacturers and do fund-raising among gun-owners is trying to scare people into buying more guns and donate more money to the NRA, and even more shocked that people who arm themselves because of fear of big government conspiracies believe that Obama's disinclination to fight for gun control is also a big government conspiracy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by thaneb (September 26, 2011 3:26 pm ET)
        3  
        No need for Obama (or any President) to circumvent the Constitution, it's all right there in the 2d Amendment. The plain words convey no right to own arms, only the right to "keep and bear arms." Note that although the press refers to gun ownership when covering SCOTUS decisions, the several decisions from 1939 to the present use the specific wording such as, "keep arms."
        The State could claim ownership of all arms and those who keep and bear would freely be granted license to do so similar to a software license. To that end, under the "well regulated militia" clause, the first clause of the Amendment, it is within the power of the executive to call for registration of all arms and recording of when they change hands.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (September 26, 2011 10:55 am ET)
      8  
      That was one of the most misleading delusional fearmongering marketing speeches I think I've ever watched.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 26, 2011 11:01 am ET)
        7  
        Yeah, basically, the folks that really support the NRA (the manufacturers of guns) went out and probably told him, "Hey. People have figured out that Obama isn't going to be taking their guns, or stopping gun sales. We need something else to get the business booming again. Give a speech where you talk about some "secret" plan to take away the 2nd Amendment. That ought to do it."

        Or something along those lines.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rms (September 27, 2011 10:46 am ET)
          3  
          Bingo - though not necessarily for just the gun sellers profits. Donations directly to the NRA are down a bit, I suspect.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Bobby C (September 26, 2011 10:58 am ET)
         
      It's all about raising money with LaPierre. Not just for the NRA but for gun and ammo manufacturers. It's like any other religion. "We're being persecuted, send money so we can fight for you and defend the 2nd amendment".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JJJ (September 26, 2011 10:59 am ET)
      7  
      Well, gun owners, if you believe this crap from Wayne LaPierre, you are fools.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (September 26, 2011 11:02 am ET)
        7  
        Yep...and there are millions of ignorant goobers out there who believe all this sh*t. Once again, another example of how the Republican Party caters to ignorant voters.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by namjah55 (September 26, 2011 11:00 am ET)
      7  
      Anyone reading this speech would think this guy was foaming at the mouth, and certianly couldn't be taken seriously. Amending the Constitution is a LONG process. Even if Obama wanted to do this (repeal the 2nd Amendment), he can't do it by fiat (which this speech implies). Even if you could get something out of the Congress, you would still need 3/4 of the states to ratify. It wouldn't happen on Obama's watch, even if he were re-elected. This is just a desperate act to try and stay relevant (and get more $$).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (September 26, 2011 11:02 am ET)
      8  
      Obama has made no pronouncements on birds and ice cream. Bird lovers beware and Ben and Jerry, your days are numbered. And these are just two items on the president's unmentioned nonexistent hit list. We must all live in fear while the spirit of Glenn Beck conspiracies lives on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Vesus (September 26, 2011 11:11 am ET)
      7  
      Without an ignorant electorate, the GOP wouldn't be able to win a mayoral election. They wouldn't even bother nominating a candidate for president.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jonimacaroni1 (September 26, 2011 12:00 pm ET)
        6  
        I'd like to hear some conservative explain to us how an honest conservative candidate could win an election with an informed pool of voters, because it sure seems like the Republican candidates and power structure sure don't seem to think that they can.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (September 26, 2011 11:20 am ET)
      8  
      This one just cracks me up. He's bad because he's allegedly going to take away gun rights and when he doesn't, he's bad because this is obviously just a ploy to cover up the fact that he's going to take away gun rights, which he has never even hinted that he was going to do.

      These people have guns, folks, and they're paranoid crazy people.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (September 26, 2011 12:09 pm ET)
        5  

        These people have guns, folks, and they're paranoid crazy people.
        That was my second thought, right after, "This guy doesn't have a clue as to how the amendment process works."
        The paranoid, delusional nature of this speech is the strongest argument for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment I've ever seen.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (September 26, 2011 12:34 pm ET)
          5  
          Thing is, is that there are plenty of us who own guns who are not crazy as these folks. Heck, I used to be a member of the NRA before they took a hard right turn to looney town (back when they did more awareness of hunting, sporting, and competitive shooting).
          Report Abuse
          • Author by montanabuddha (September 26, 2011 12:39 pm ET)
            3  
            Amen
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Conchobhar (September 26, 2011 12:57 pm ET)
              4  
              I wasn't saying I was in favor of repealing the Deuce. However, I think the right has gone completely overboard in its simplistic deification of it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by montanabuddha (September 26, 2011 2:03 pm ET)
                4  
                I got it.

                I was applauding the part about the NRA before the crazies took over. I was a Lifer but quit when LaP went on TV and said an M16 was his favorite deer rifle.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (September 26, 2011 2:10 pm ET)
                  5  
                  Well, you know a single shot won't stop a charging Bambi.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by manndan (September 27, 2011 7:31 pm ET)
                    2  
                    In the words of Elayne Boosler "if you need a fifty-round magazine hunting might not be your sport."
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by heehee..santorum (September 26, 2011 11:31 am ET)
      8  
      This latest conspiracy to lull me into believing that an Cheerios and an AK-47 are part of a good American breakfast is indeed working. I don't think Kim Jong Il or the Pakistani Taliban have as much access to weapons as a resident of Houston Texas does. The irony is amazing. I could fire off a few rounds from an easily available tripod-mounted SKS or 50 cal. anti-aircraft gun of my choice to scare off the G-Men enforcing sensible regulations, but I hate to waste ammo. Yeah, Mr. Obama is certainly on a stealth gun-grab, it is the stealthiest move yet, La Pierre is one smart cookie.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 26, 2011 12:36 pm ET)
        3  
        Well, an SKS or .50 cal machine gun aren't readily available. You can get them. But they're expensive, and you'll have to fill out a WHOLE lot of paper work.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (September 26, 2011 1:46 pm ET)
          6  
          You have to qualify for a class 3 firearms license to own a fully automatic rifle however; you can buy a single shot AR-50 for 3K and take out helicopters at 1000 yards. If you go to the gun shows you can pick up a used one even cheaper.

          I mean really, who doesn't need a .50 cal weapon to go rabbit or deer hunting?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by heehee..santorum (September 26, 2011 1:47 pm ET)
          6  
          no an no, there is a350 dollar sks sitting in the pawn shop 2 miles away, and every Gun and Knife show in Houston sells the finest tripod mounted SKS and ak-ak's money can buy. And if paperwork is your solution, I can walk through the parking lot/ outdoor free sales zone until I find what I want, new in the crate or modified by my friendly neighborhood Bandido gunsmith. Expensive? I can purchase an 'assault-style' weapon by a Chinese or Romanian manufacturer cheaper that a Smith and Wesson .357 revolover, with standard bluing and walnut grips. The access to assault 'style' weapons makes unscrupulous gunsmiths a fortune, you can't make a bolt-action 30/30 full auto without creating a new weapon, but an AR-15 or AK-47 knock-off are ripe for bastardization. And standard operating procedure on available 'legal' models is deadly enough, full auto and burst only waste your shells and make aiming an afterthought. I did 2 years on a gun charge, I know of what I speak.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by heehee..santorum (September 26, 2011 2:08 pm ET)
            5  
            You might even say my tale of woe is the 'poster child' of why access to actual Colt AR-15's is a dumb,dumb, dumb proposition.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (September 26, 2011 2:17 pm ET)
              5  
              OK, one more tidbit and I will shut up, in roughly 1986 or 1987, I was drinking in a bar in Arlington, Texas, and I heard an aquaintance bragging about machine guns he had. I called his bluff and told him to bring me an UZI to shut him up. 3 days later he showed up at my house with a pristine Uzi, and shocked the snot out of me. He got pulled over in Fort Worth and the weapon was HIS trip to TDC. Our country is FLUSH with everything you don't need in the hands of non-soldiers.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (September 26, 2011 11:31 am ET)
      3  
      Here's a sure-fire way to take all their guns away: Point the other direction and yell, "O
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The New Pilgrims (September 26, 2011 11:33 am ET)
        6  
        Let's try this again, shall we?

        Here's a sure-fire way to take all their guns away: Point the other direction and yell, "OH MY GOD HERE COMES OBAMA TO TAKE YOUR GUNS AWAY!!!"

        And then when they turn around to look, that is when we take their guns away.

        This worked yesterday with my Uncle Rufus.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (September 26, 2011 11:57 am ET)
      6  
      <Yawn Redux>

      The gun nuts are still numbingly redundant.

      Wake me up when Obama actually starts confiscating legal firearms from law-abiding owners.

      Until then... <zzzzzzzzzzz>
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Conchobhar (September 26, 2011 12:14 pm ET)
      6  
      Donald Rumsfeld has a lot to answer for, not least his mal mot, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." Conspiracy nuts everywhere, you now have carte blanche.
      And you're absolutely right. Today is the first day of the rest of my conspiracy to replace English with French.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (September 26, 2011 12:15 pm ET)
      3  
      Fooling gun owners seems to be pretty easy. Even a dumbass like LaPierre can do it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CrashGordon (September 26, 2011 12:19 pm ET)
      4  
      After all, the NRA needs funding


      I agree. Once upon a time, I was a member of the NRA (membership was required in order to shoot at the local gun club). There is no way that my annual membership fee paid for all the mailings they sent me full of propaganda and requests for more money so that they could fight the liberals in Washington who were about to take my guns away.

      Kinda funny--that was over twenty years ago. I still have my guns, and according to the NRA the liberals are still coming to take them away.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 26, 2011 12:25 pm ET)
      3  
      So this guy's trying to convince America that Obama actually DOES have the balls to stand up to the Right?

      Goooood luck with that!

      ---------------------------------------
      IMHO
      UTOPIA
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ThomasJH268 (September 26, 2011 12:52 pm ET)
      3  
      And that would cost the NRA millions in yearly membership dues and your salary would take a hit. Right, Wayne?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (September 26, 2011 1:00 pm ET)
        4  
        Good point. He's preying on the simple-minded. Just like those televangelists that talk the credulous into impoverishing themselves by donating because, "Jesus will reward you."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by OHBROTHER58 (September 26, 2011 4:07 pm ET)
          2  
          I have used this analogy before, but it bears repeating.

          Obama is the thief who doesn't steal. But how can he be a thief if he doesn't steal? That's how he lulls people into thinking he's not a thief. If he stole, then everybody would know he's a thief. Therefore, he does not steal, and people therefore don't realize that he's a thief. But if he doesn't steal, doesn't that mean he's not a thief? And so on...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (September 26, 2011 6:13 pm ET)
            1  
            Yeah, but you just know he wants to lift your wallet.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by NotSure8 (September 27, 2011 5:01 pm ET)
               
            Well, the reason he wants to take your guns away is because he is a liberul.

            Just like in your story we know he is a thief because of his race.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by FreewheelingFranklin (September 27, 2011 3:47 pm ET)
      3  
      We need guns to protect our personal freedoms, just like they do in Somalia, Mexico, Afghanistan, Iraq,.........
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjandi (September 27, 2011 8:41 pm ET)
         
      Why in the world would Obama want to outlaw guns when hes in the business of selling guns to Mexican drug cartels?
      I can see the headlines now, Obama confiscates guns from Americans and sells them to criminals in mexico.

      Lets fire the butler in the whitehouse and replace him with a real American, Ron Paul for President.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by txthinker (September 28, 2011 10:29 am ET)
         
      Wayne LaPierre is proof that NRA really stands for Nuts Ruining America.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.