About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Limbaugh's Latest Smear: Obama Is "Target[ing] Christians" In Uganda

October 14, 2011 7:55 pm ET by Terry Krepel

On his radio show today, Rush Limbaugh launched another religion-based smear of President Obama: that he is sending troops to Africa to kill Christians. Limbaugh declared that "President Obama has deployed troops to another war, in Africa," adding that the group being targeted, the Lord's Resistance Army, "are Christians. They are fighting the Muslims in Sudan. And Obama has sent troops, United States troops to remove them from the battlefield, which means kill them. ... So that's a new war, a hundred troops to wipe out Christians." Limbaugh then claimed that Obama supports "help[ing] the Egyptians wipe out the Christians."

So proud was Limbaugh of this attack that he posted the transcript of it, complete with audio (for paid subscribers) on his website, under the headline "Obama Invades Uganda, Targets Christians":

uganda

But Limbaugh largely ignored the record of atrocities committed by the Lord's Resistance Army, and the group's claimed Christian ties are reportedly part of a mish-mash of other religious and occult beliefs.

From Limbaugh's October 14 show, as transcribed on his website:

LIMBAUGH: Have you ever heard of Lord's Resistance Army, Dawn? How about you, Brian? Snerdley, have you? You never heard of Lord's Resistance Army? Well, proves my contention, most Americans have never heard of it, and here we are at war with them.  Lord's Resistance Army are Christians.  It means God. I was only kidding. Lord's Resistance Army are Christians.  They are fighting the Muslims in Sudan. And Obama has sent troops, United States troops to remove them from the battlefield, which means kill them. That's what the lingo means, "to help regional forces remove from the battlefield," meaning capture or kill. 

So that's a new war, a hundred troops to wipe out Christians in Sudan, Uganda, and -- (interruption) no, I'm not kidding. Jacob Tapper just reported it.  Now, are we gonna help the Egyptians wipe out the Christians?  Wouldn't you say that we are?  I mean the Coptic Christians are being wiped out, but it wasn't just Obama that supported that. The conservative intelligentsia thought it was an outbreak of democracy. Now they've done a 180 on that, but they forgot that they supported it in the first place.  Now they're criticizing it. 

Lord's Resistance Army objectives.  I have them here. "To remove dictatorship and stop the oppression of our people." Now, again Lord's Resistance Army is who Obama sent troops to help nations wipe out. The objectives of the Lord's Resistance Army, what they're trying to accomplish with their military action in these countries is the following:  "To remove dictatorship and stop the oppression of our people; to fight for the immediate restoration of the competitive multiparty democracy in Uganda; to see an end to gross violation of human rights and dignity of Ugandans; to ensure the restoration of peace and security in Uganda, to ensure unity, sovereignty, and economic prosperity beneficial to all Ugandans, and to bring to an end the repressive policy of deliberate marginalization of groups of people who may not agree with the LRA ideology." Those are the objectives of the group that we are fighting, or who are being fought and we are joining in the effort to remove them from the battlefield. 

Later in the show, Limbaugh reinforced the smear by asking a caller, "[H]ow do you react to the news that Obama has dispatched a hundred soldiers to fight radical Christians in Africa?" At another point in the show, Limbaugh again said that Obama was "sending the soldiers to fight the Christians in Africa."

But while Limbaugh was making these attacks, he was seemingly ignorant of the record of atrocities committed by the Lord's Resistance Army. The International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for the group's leader, Joseph Kony, states that "the LRA has engaged in a cycle of violence and established a pattern of 'brutalization of civilians' by acts including murder, abduction, sexual enslavement, mutilation, as well as mass burnings of houses and looting of camp settlements; that abducted civilians, including children, are said to have been forcibly 'recruited' as fighters, porters and sex slaves to serve the LRA and to contribute to attacks against the Ugandan army and civilian communities."

While Kony claims to be a Christian, he and his army reportedly practice a syncretic religion of which Christianity is only one part. From Christianity Today:

Kony, 41, envisions an Acholiland ruled by a warped interpretation of the Ten Commandments. He uses passages from the Pentateuch to justify mutilation and murder. He promotes a demonic spirituality crafted from an eclectic mix of Christianity, Islam, and African witchcraft.

Any resemblance to these religions is superficial: While the army observes rituals such as praying the rosary and bowing toward Mecca, there is no prescribed theology in the conventional sense. Kony's beliefs are a haphazard mix from the Bible and the Qur'an, tailored around his wishful thinking, personal desires, and practical needs of the moment. Jesus is the Son of God. But instead of saving the world from sin through his sacrificial love on the Cross, he is a source of power employed for killing those who oppose Kony. The Holy Spirit is not the Divine Comforter, but one who directs Kony's tactical military decisions.

Despite dabbling in the Bible and the Qur'an, Kony's real spiritual obsession is witchcraft. He burns toy military vehicles and figurines to predict the course of battles from their burn patterns. He uses reptiles in magic rituals to sicken those who anger him or to detect traitors in his midst. He claims to receive military direction from spirits of dead men from different countries, including Americans. He teaches that an impending apocalypse will usher in "The Silent World," where only primitive weapons, such as machetes and clubs, will bring victory.

Christianity Today adds that the group's most frequent target is children:

They rape, mutilate, and kill them with a rapaciousness that staggers the imagination. Worse, they compel children to kill one another and their own families, fighting as "soldiers" in an armed force deliberately composed of children.

Perhaps the greatest atrocity is teaching these children that they spread this carnage by the power of the Holy Spirit to purify the "unrepentant," twisting Christianity into a religion of horror to their victims. It is spiritual warfare at its very worst, and it could not be more satanic.

After making his attacks on Obama, Limbaugh then appeared to concede that maybe the Lord's Resistance Army aren't very nice people after all:

LIMBAUGH: Is that right? The Lord's Resistance Army is being accused of really bad stuff? Child kidnapping, torture, murder, that kind of stuff? Well, we just found out about this today. We're gonna do, of course, our due diligence research on it. But nevertheless we got a hundred troops being sent over there to fight these guys -- and they claim to be Christians.

Too bad Limbaugh couldn't be bothered to do any "due diligence research" on the group's well-documented atrocities and dubious claims to be "Christian" before exploiting the group to smear Obama.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by whatIthink (October 14, 2011 8:05 pm ET)
      20  
      "But while Limbaugh was making these attacks, he was seemingly ignorant of the record of atrocities committed by the Lord's Resistance Army."

      I highly doubt that. I think Rush knows exactly who the LRA are. He just doesn't care. All he see's is just another opportunity to attack Obama, f**k the facts. Nor does he care that he is aligning himself with a bunch of brutal, raping, mudering,kidnapping a$$wipes (the sad thing is that his listeners don't care either)...as long as they're fighting against the scary mooslems (yes, that was intentionally misspelled)...which gives him an added by bonus trying to slyly link the scary mooslems the LRA is fighting directly to Obama...who must be a mooslem...because he wants to kill Christians...

      Seriously, to the current Mrs Limbaugh, please tell me that you are just a gold digger and that you don't think that this moron is worth any sort of respect.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (October 14, 2011 8:16 pm ET)
        14  
        I'm not sure what Christians really are.
        If fat boy is a Christian, then that surely leaves me in a fog.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by heehee..santorum (October 14, 2011 8:19 pm ET)
          13  
          I am of the opinion that Jesus may not claim this one.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Turkeysocks (October 14, 2011 8:21 pm ET)
            18  
            I am of the opinion that Jesus already came down, saw and hear what these "Christians" were saying and doing, and was like:

            "Well, if I came out and told people I was Jesus, I'd probably get shot, so I'm going to work in a record store".
            Report Abuse
            • Author by danielsangeo (October 14, 2011 8:27 pm ET)
              20  
              Family Guy, right?

              But I'm of the opinion that Jesus already came down, appeared in Mexico, called himself Jesús Christophoro, and then walked across the border to the US looking to tell the Christians that he had returned...and was shot and killed by a Christian militiaman.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by heehee..santorum (October 14, 2011 9:05 pm ET)
                7  
                That sounds entirely too plausible for my taste. If he has to come back a THIRD time.......
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Turkeysocks (October 14, 2011 9:55 pm ET)
                10  
                Well, I put "Christians" in quote because Jesus was a Jew, and his sect wasn't even called "Christians". It was the name given to the sect long after him, and the original apostles had passed one.

                But, I like your idea!

                Though I have to ask, why would Jesus bother traveling to the US? There are more devout Christians in Mexico and South America then there are in the US.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by danielsangeo (October 14, 2011 10:43 pm ET)
                  12  
                  Americans need to hear the true word of the Lord, especially American Christians such as Mr. Limbaugh. Other countries are okay (though Uganda needs lot of help from the Savior, other countries, too).

                  Far too many American Christians do not practice Christianity as Jesus commanded to Paul when the religion was being created.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (October 16, 2011 2:43 pm ET)
                    7  
                    "If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it.
                    Stephen Colbert.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (October 15, 2011 12:42 am ET)
          14  
          Limbaugh is always short on facts when he complains about Obama. There is so little that Limbaugh can legitimately complain about our President so he has to tell these whopping lies. In some ways, I feel sorry for poor Rush. His whole ability to badmouth this administration has to be predicated on just a bunch of "made up" stuff that does not even exist in the world of reality. But leave it to Rush to just manufacture his own information with complete disregard for facts. At that he is obviously VERY creative. He is to be pitied!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (October 15, 2011 2:29 am ET)
            15  
            You're exactly right, mari. I had the pleasure of hearing this pile this morning, and even being familiar with Lispy's shameless propaganda, this was despicable.

            He did a little of the Sean Hannity act, reading quotes or a news item while adding his own editorializing to the "quote". Hannity likes to use "quote" and "unquote", while not understanding that you don't get to add embellishments in between those two words.

            Lispy was loosely referencing the item he was reading, while tossing in his interpretations of Obama's thoughts ( I'm going to kill Christians").

            I can almost excuse some dimwits for buying Lispy's dopey opinions, I can see frightened old religious racists eager to believe him when he's obviously giving his twisted take on reality.

            I can't really, even as a non-religious person, excuse anybody dumb enough to buy this stuff, that the president ( a Christian) was specifically allocating resources to attack Christians for being Christians.

            This is a new low for Limbaugh. I don't see any posters here defending him, and there's probably a good reason for that. Once in a while, Lispy gets too stupid even for the dittoheads.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (October 15, 2011 2:37 am ET)
              9  
              This habit of targeting Christians is not without precedent, British Crown:Christians, Spanish Crown:Christians, Mexican Govt.:Christians, German Reich:well, sort of Christians, there are more I am sure, but Rush may want to ease up on the whole 'nice Christians' bit.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (October 16, 2011 12:55 am ET)
        5  
        You could stop that sentence at "He (Limbaugh) was seemingly ignorant! and that truly described Rush. He has a one track mind that is unable to take in facts that do not agree with his bias. The poor thing deserves our pity. Of course expecting Rush to understand all those complicated problems in many other countries is just far above his capabilities. I am of the opinion he knew the facts and chose to just bury them and still attack people who are reasonable about this tragic situation. But what more do we expect of Rush. He is simply an ideologue and seems incapable of having any concern or compassion for others. The poor thing seems bereft of Godly impulses.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (October 16, 2011 10:13 pm ET)
        2  
        Or you could just be factual by shortening this sentence to the following - "But while Limbaugh was making these attacks, he was seemingly ignorant!" Enough said because that is certainly a factual shortened version of the statement that says it all about Limbaugh.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Iceguy (October 14, 2011 8:30 pm ET)
      10  
      EIBimbo, if they people are Christians they need to REPENT for their sins on humanity.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phlcstgan (October 14, 2011 8:55 pm ET)
      15  
      Is it really that shocking that Rush Limbaugh is in favor of a group that exploits young boys and makes them do terrible things?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by heehee..santorum (October 14, 2011 9:07 pm ET)
        10 1
        Catholics?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by heehee..santorum (October 14, 2011 9:48 pm ET)
          5  
          Sorry all you Papists, it was a JOKE....I was a freaking ALTAR BOY for Gods sake! (OK, really it was to impress Grandma)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by whatIthink (October 14, 2011 10:27 pm ET)
            8 3
            Well, it's not really too much of a joke. About time some indictments were handed down against the people who were in charge and turned a blind eye.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by heehee..santorum (October 14, 2011 10:33 pm ET)
              7 3
              I am a 48 year old Catholic, shove your self righteous sh!t up your ass, and then tell me which faith is infallible, as I am QUITE aware of our problems.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by whatIthink (October 15, 2011 12:07 am ET)
                7 3
                How is it being self righteous when there is a verified pattern of abuse and the subsequent coverups by all levels of the Catholic church? I was an altar boy as well (and no, I was never abused by a priest), but to sweep what did happen to others under the rug and refer to it as a "problem"...who's being self-righteous now?

                If this is your idea of a "problem", I'd hate to see your idea of a crisis.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by heehee..santorum (October 15, 2011 1:47 am ET)
                  6 4
                  Do you have the ignorant phucking impression I am a member of the Holy See whatithink? Or am I out of line for assuming that grown ups here might recognize a self-deprecating hit...at my own absurd faith? Any Religion that bestows "infallibility" upon its spiritual head may not have a contingency for admitting to a half century or more of hideous abuse. I am not touchy nor blind to the sexual depravity that has plagued MANY faiths throughout the world. If you feel me bringing up a glaring and half-ass addressed CRISIS in the Catholic church is 'sweeping it under the rug', perhaps my lenses need correction. Ask me a stupid question, and you will get a stupid answer, stupid, I am not self-righteous at all, I didn't click on your bullsh!t link because I am not some prick ninny that that requires a "link" to make a call,that is a trick the righties like, they semm to have a fine protege in you. Phuck off.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by heehee..santorum (October 15, 2011 2:04 am ET)
                    3 4
                    Now whatithink, it just so happens I am WHITE, as well as Catholic, since WHITE people have perpetrated some of the best and most hideous cases of genocide and enslavement of other races and peoples, if I MENTION it, am I somehow degrading white people? Or is it a tacit admission of culpability not to repeat others wrongdoings? I am sorry, PC may be a convenient way to demonize others, but when I have to have some punk tell me what a 5th grader should know, pickins are indeed sparse.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by 17andLiberal (October 15, 2011 2:44 am ET)
                      9  
                      I don't mean to speak for anyone else or be inflammatory, but if I may interject, when reading the exchange I assumed that whatithink's initial issue was not with you bringing up the problems within the Catholic Church, but with you referring to it as a "joke" after someone objected to your bringing it up.

                      Your initial comment, though clearly made in a jesting manner, required no defense in my opinion. If someone else can't handle the truth, that's their issue. There was no need to apologize or trivialize the reference in your comment because of them.

                      Regardless, I think we can all agree that the real problem here is Obama and his blatant plan to murder the world's Christian population in defense of his Muslim brethren...
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by heehee..santorum (October 15, 2011 3:13 am ET)
                        4 1
                        I am OLD to this Earth, but NEW to the interwebs, and sometimes my attempts at levity are a failure at best. Perhaps it is my own sensitivity at the absurdity of Religious dogma, as opposed to incorporating what CHRIST taught into my feeble existence, which is WAY tougher than it sounds. Yes, I am sure a lot of people feel justifiably enraged and heartbroken, at the thought that the "Holy Mother Church" would knowingly hide such a sin. There are MEN running this institution, fallible men, and the FOOL who decided that another MAN should be placed in an unassailable position of unquestioned infallibility should be retroactively horsewhipped. I understand whatithinks point, I just have to laugh at the things most likely to make me cry, it is a defense mechanism, I am sure. But yes, in summation, you are 100% correct: our Kenyan -socialist-Muslim-Gangster-Apologist in Chief is out for blood and it is Christian blood, to give a leg up to the coming Caliphate. It is as plain as the nose on my face....
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by whatIthink (October 15, 2011 9:55 am ET)
                          6  
                          Down with the Kenyan usurper!!!!
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by grmce (October 15, 2011 10:05 am ET)
                          7  
                          Meanwhile no one acknowledges the paedophilia that is perpetrated by scout leaders, sports coaches, carers and, dare I say it, Non-Conformist Protestant Clergy.

                          In fact, anywhere there are young people there are sexual predators. The most important thing we can do is to be aware of this and then take sensibel precautions.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by grmce (October 15, 2011 10:13 am ET)
                            8  
                            "Sensible". I was thinking of the the sensibell - a percussion instrument I'm working on to go with my mandarine (mandolin neck on a tambourine) and bare-faced lyre (a small pillarless harp).
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Conchobhar (October 15, 2011 3:21 pm ET)
                              6  
                              Thanks for reminding me, grmce. I caught this program on WAMC, our local NPR (gasp) affiliate a couple of weeks ago, and thought of you, Andy, and a couple of others who OT'd about string instruments (I think in a Nugent thread). You all seem to prefer electric to acoustic, which I don't, but I think you'll find this interesting, if not wonderful.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by grmce (October 16, 2011 1:32 am ET)
                                4  
                                Thanks Concho, quite interesting. Actually my performing career mainly involved acoustic instruments - especially my first instrument, voice, where I was trained to sing without the use of microphones.

                                The Anglo Celtic part of my career was entirely acoustic based, although we did use sound reinforcement for stage performances. Accompanying morris dancers was entirely acoustic - at times using button accodion and 4 fiddles.

                                I do love the feel of an acoustic instrument as it vibrates in my hands and through my body.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by Conchobhar (October 16, 2011 1:47 pm ET)
                                  4  
                                  especially my first instrument, voice, where I was trained to sing without the use of microphones.
                                  I was trained sans mic too, though not as a singer. I'm not a big guy, but I could, without shouting, make myself heard clearly throughout really big houses, including (if memory hasn't magnified) a 7,000 seater in Lynn, MA. It still galls me to see actors and singers on Broadway mic'd up.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by grmce (October 16, 2011 11:18 pm ET)
                                       
                                    It still galls me to see actors and singers on Broadway mic'd up.
                                    Too bloody right!

                                    My pet hate is sporting events where they get some juvenile soap "star" who has no real singing voice to sing the National Anthem. In lieu of a voice they shove a microphone down their gullet and simulate constipation whilst in search of a note.

                                    The resultant sludge is barely sufficient to inspire a person to get out of bed, let alone win a footy match.

                                    /grumpy rant off
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by Conchobhar (October 17, 2011 1:24 pm ET)
                                         
                                      Spot on. Although I have to believe it's worse for us than for you. If your national anthem is as hard to sing as ours, you should dig up the composers bones and feed them to dingoes.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by grmce (October 17, 2011 2:03 pm ET)
                                           
                                        Yes I recall that you have that leap - what is it 10 notes? Very awkward. I have a dread of St Pat's Day and generally stay at home for fear of being approached by a "nicey-thankyou" person of Irish extraction pleading with me to sing "Danny Boy". If you don't get the key right you'll run out of notes at one end or the other!

                                        My major problem with national anthem singers at public events is that they fail to realise that they are not giving a performance for an audience, they are leading an important community singing event.

                                        Showing off with crude attempts at inappropriate ornaments is a no-no. Sing it straight and sing it clean. I would also add that national anthems must be sung with spirit. It is so easy to turn them into dirges if the lead isn't spirited enough. The Italians seem to have the most dirge-proof of the European anthems.
                                        Report Abuse
                          • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 16, 2011 8:57 pm ET)
                            2  
                            Meanwhile no one acknowledges the paedophilia that is perpetrated by scout leaders, sports coaches, carers and, dare I say it, Non-Conformist Protestant Clergy.

                            In fact, anywhere there are young people there are sexual predators. The most important thing we can do is to be aware of this and then take sensibel precautions.

                            Amen?
                            Report Abuse
              • Author by BetaC (October 15, 2011 12:30 am ET)
                   
                Judging by your written demeanor and foul language - You may think you are Catholic - You are not.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by 17andLiberal (October 14, 2011 9:09 pm ET)
      12  
      So after they read about the actual situation they must have thought, oh, this is boring. Let's just pretend that we haven't been supporting anti-LRA efforts since 2008 under Bush, and that Obama is sending combat troops rather than advisors, and that the LRA haven't done horrible, horrible things.

      And that pretend story is the one we'll run with.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by danielsangeo (October 14, 2011 9:32 pm ET)
      12  
      Limbaugh is upset that Obama is "targeting" "Christians" because he agrees with the Ugandan government in their "targeting" of homosexuals.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Turkeysocks (October 14, 2011 10:02 pm ET)
        8  
        It sounds like something Limbaugh and the Tea Party would try to put through Congress if they had a chance.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (October 14, 2011 10:14 pm ET)
      9  
      If someone who kidnaps, 10 to 14 year old male kids, tells them to kill their father, mother and siblings, and if they do not, cuts their nose, tongue off is a christian, sure the Preseident is targeting christians. I would wish to target that christian (or whatever) too.
      These days evil comes in so many different flavors.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Johaely (October 14, 2011 11:00 pm ET)
      7  
      Why the sudden concern from the right? They didn't have any with Iraq?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (October 14, 2011 11:09 pm ET)
      9  
      How can one person, even if a Kenyan born, muslim, socialist, anti job creator, invade a peaceful country of christians, with 100 soldiers?
      Who listens to, much less agree with, this clown?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by 17andLiberal (October 15, 2011 2:46 am ET)
        4  
        I heard someone earlier talking about how we had gone to war with Uganda, so apparently some people out there...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (October 15, 2011 10:19 am ET)
          2  
          If we are at war with every country we've put Soldiers into, well, we'd be at war with most of the world. Soldiers go into and out of countries ALL OF THE TIME. Mostly, on covert missions.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by politeradical (October 15, 2011 12:33 am ET)
      7  
      Tubby hit a new low, and that's saying a lot.

      It must hurt that so called Christians can be murderous beats too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (October 15, 2011 6:15 am ET)
        7  
        I actually had a far-right wing Christian tell me that anyone who does acts of sin are "not Christians" but "atheists". That's right. The Ugandan people, even if they claim to be "Christians" are "atheists" according to this person.

        If that's the case, then the current population of "atheism" is 100%.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (October 15, 2011 10:21 am ET)
          5  
          True enough. Show me one Christian who isn't guilty of being a sinner at some point in their life. I don't think you can, no matter how devout or pious someone is. If they say they're without sin, they're lying. And by lying, have committed another sin.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ImaBore (October 15, 2011 12:48 pm ET)
            3  
            My brother-in-law, who attends church every Sunday, says the church is a house of sinners. I told him that's why I don't go.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (October 15, 2011 11:19 am ET)
          5  
          Another convenient use of the No True Scotsman defense.

          On a related note, Penn Jillette was on a segment of Real Time last night. I'm not in agreement with a lot of his politics, but there was an interesting conversation between him and Bill Maher ( which would definitely be called "Religion bashing" by the hyper-religious and insecure) about atheism.

          Jillette suggested asking the question " If God told you to kill your child, would you do it?"

          If the answer is "no", you're an atheist. If it's "yes", he suggested you reconsider, ;0)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Deluded (October 16, 2011 8:12 pm ET)
            3  
            Jillette suggested asking the question " If God told you to kill your child, would you do it?"


            God told Abraham the very same thing, and Abraham was committed to sacrificing his child Issac as a response.

            He was stopped of course, and everything was just a test of fate.

            However to my knowledge God doesn't really do these types of tests of faith any more.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by dommanno3075 (October 16, 2011 3:29 pm ET)
          3  
          I actually had a far-right wing Christian tell me that anyone who does acts of sin are "not Christians" but "atheists"
          While their own book says:
          For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God
          (Romans 3:23)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (October 15, 2011 6:19 am ET)
      3  
      The Lord's Resistance Army is right up there with the Khmer Rouge as an organisation that has perverted a philosophy of social concern in order to justify abominable crimes against humanity. Just the sort of people to appeal to the likes of Limbaugh(especially the boy soldiers?).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cate123 (October 15, 2011 7:58 am ET)
      4  
      When all else fails...make it a religous issue.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlos (October 15, 2011 8:51 am ET)
      1 7
      The LRA are Christians. I can see why "Christianity Today" would want to spin that uncomfortable reality away, but it makes no sense for MMFA to do that.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (October 16, 2011 3:14 pm ET)
        4  
        What reality are you talking about Carlos? Please do not even TRY to claim Rush is representing reality here that is just demented
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Bob Stanley (October 15, 2011 9:10 am ET)
      4  
      Tell Rush that even the Freepers didn't fall for this one.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by I AM ENOCH (October 15, 2011 11:34 am ET)
         
      It's amazing how Rush and Glen can be so foolish at times, on his show, when it comes to black people, whom he clearly doesen't have a qlue who we are.... and forget how important black america is to this country, in some ways I agree with rush and glen when it comes to black america being foolish,
      I agree cause it wasn't that long ago that blacks where hung daily from a tree by there necks and beaten as the photo's show right in front of the church for over a hundren yrs. during this time the bible stated that blacks can not be apart of the christian church accept being hung in front of it, and where did the KKK come from...the christian church OF COURSE. with the POPE himself as the founder, of the christian church, so again I agree with RUSH AND GLEN when they say black americian's or ignorant, cause there, should not be a single black person calling themselfs a christian in this country.
      And for sure, not,calling themself a DEACON of any so call christian church, which the lost gospels say that the lord himself call them a thorn in his ASS....LOL
      So Rush and Glen keep up the good work broadcasting JESUS WHOM IS ' HEY ZOOKS THE LATIN DEVIL ] you shall live a long time... AS YOU HAVE MAKE HIM YOUR GOD.... JESUS THE MIGHTY LATIN DEVIL.... AS STATED IN THE DEVIL'S BIBLE ITSELF...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by garygnj (October 16, 2011 10:57 am ET)
      4  
      Not that Limbaugh reads news that doesn't jibe with his limited and uninformed world view,but someone should rub his bloated pug in these pics and then we can see how he feels about the LRA.

      http://pulitzercenter.org/slideshows/images-perfect-place-hell-part-i
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (October 16, 2011 2:56 pm ET)
      8  
      And again...

      "I like your Christ but I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Gandhi

      Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (October 17, 2011 12:00 am ET)
      2  
      Better to remain silent and be thought ignorant than to speak up and remove all doubt.

      If Limbaugh suffers no humiliation from the blowback to this load of old cobblers then you have a real problem. This little outburst should be enough to render him a figure of ridicule and utter contempt by any and all in the media. Joseph Krony presents as the archetypal anti-Christ and, it seems, Limbaugh is his apologist, if not disciple.

      I look forward to seeing him in the dock at the ICC as a crony of Krony.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.