About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

A Lonely Voice Of Reason Stands Up To Fox's Smears Of Occupy Wall Street

November 04, 2011 9:01 pm ET by Andy Newbold

During tonight's episode of Fox News' The Five, co-host Juan Williams repeatedly attempted to combat the off-the-wall smears of the Occupy Wall Street movement coming from his co-hosts.

First the hosts condemned Jesse Jackson for comparing the Occupy Wall Street movement to the Civil Rights movement. Greg Gutfeld described Jackson's comments as an example of "the usual suspects fading in relevance, salvaging careers, by exploiting class envy." Williams responded by saying that Jackson was "absolutely right" and pointed out that all great examples of social change in America had come about because of protests:

WILLIAMS: Yeah, he's absolutely right when you think about the idea that there's very little change in our country and any society without struggle, without people putting themselves out. You know, Dr. King used to talk about the idea of creative struggle, creative tension. That you would create situations with marches and protests and some cases even break the law. That's why King went to jail. You stop and think about things like the Vietnam War movement, you think about the feminist movement to get votes in this country.

When Gutfeld responded by calling Occupy Wall Street protesters "annoying," Williams retorted that if Gutfeld had been in Birmingham in the '60s, he would have labeled King a "northern agitator."

Bolling also claimed Occupy Wall Street had no "overall message, that's the problem." Williams had to add another dose of sanity to the discussion after that, pointing out that the overall concern of Occupy Wall Street is "income inequality" and that is a message that "a good number of Americans embrace."

Again, immediately after Williams finished his statement, he was attacked by his co-hosts for supporting violent people who, according to Gutfeld, are "reflective" of the overall movement.

Williams called out his fellow co-hosts for claiming that isolated events reflect the entire Occupy Wall Street movement:

WILLIAMS: I don't think those people are reflective of Occupy Wall Street movements all over this country. I mean Atlanta, Baltimore, it goes on and on. And you guys pick out one specific place with one specific -- and Kimberly talks about rapes and bad behavior as if you're condemning the whole movement.

Later, co-host Kimberly Guilfoyle then tried to claim that Occupy Wall Street is a socialist movement and Bolling attacked the movement for supporting income redistribution. Williams responded:

WILLIAMS: You guys say: "You know what, what's been going on in this country is just fine and dandy." [Co-host] Dana [Perino] rightly says we need to have changes, and Dana has her own set of prescriptions. We might disagree, but she has policy prescriptions. If these are folks who say, "let's have change; we're tired of the big guys who control the politicians, control Wall Street, looking out for themselves and screwing everybody else," you guys say: "Oh don't raise a fuss. Don't inconvenience us. Don't block traffic."

Gutfeld then interrupted to say Occupy Wall Street protesters should be more like the tea party who protested "peacefully with permits" adding "nobody got arrested, nobody got raped, nobody got assaulted." 

Williams responded by pointing out the real reason why the other co-hosts were so eager to attack Occupy Wall Street:

WILLIAMS: The reasons you guys are so afraid of Occupy Wall Street is --

GUTFELD: Because they're violent.

WILLIAMS: -- because they have the power to change the national narrative and to elect not only Obama, but to elect Democrats in this country.

Bolling then claimed that Occupy Wall Street wanted to change the system away from capitalism. And Williams had to set him straight:

WILLIAMS: Nobody is suggesting there's anything better than capitalism.

BOLLING: No, they all are.

WILLIAMS: I'm a big capitalist. You're a capitalist, and those folks out there are capitalists.

BOLLING: Are not capitalists.

WILLIAMS: They are.

[crosstalk]

WILLIAMS: But let me tell you something. Those are capitalists. You know what?

BOLLING: Self-described non-capitalists.

WILLIAMS: Let me tell you something: There are some things like excesses to every structure. And when you have the bankers and the Wall Street guys gobbling at the trough like greedy pigs, then somebody should say something.

So, Fox again attempted to mock, smear, and vilify the Occupy Wall Street protesters in an effort to continue pushing the network's political agenda. But at least this time, Williams was there to provide a dose of reality.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by CAL (November 04, 2011 10:10 pm ET)
      20  
      We get it FOXPAC clowns. You a-holes want your "capitalism" with a heaping dose of corruption thrown in. Oh, and by the way, if any of you pathetic cowards actually believed the OWS protesters are overwhemlingly prone to violence, none of you would be flapping your gums. You'd all be in hiding in Uncle Rupie's apron strings.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phlcstgan (November 04, 2011 10:18 pm ET)
      10  
      I think the real story is that Gutfeld somehow acquired the stones to call somebody annoying.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ThomasJH268 (November 04, 2011 10:20 pm ET)
      12  
      I can count, one one hand, the number of people at FOXPAC who have even hinted they think that OWS might have a tiny bit of a valid point and still have enough left over to give FOXPAC the bird.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (November 04, 2011 10:55 pm ET)
      11 1
      I would not label Williams as a 'voice of reason'. 'Voice of opportunity' may be.
      He needs to come to grips with himself on why he is concerned/afraid when he sees a group of people praying in a different way than he does. I am not a muslim.
      If it is because of 911, he is unreasonable.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rashadkijani (November 04, 2011 10:58 pm ET)
      5  
      That episode focused more on Cartman who represented the 1%.
      South Parks OWS
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bootyprof (November 04, 2011 11:45 pm ET)
      15  
      Good for you Juan. That was the most sense I've seen on Faux in a while. Shame its 4 against 1.

      "Fair and balanced" is Orwellian and absolutely disturbing.

      I know I say this too much but Eric Bolling is a complete knuckle-dragger. I can't believe Faux gives him a national platform. He just isn't impressive at all and cheapens the conservative brand.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1949vet (November 05, 2011 12:34 am ET)
         
      WILLIAMS: The reasons you guys are so afraid of Occupy Wall Street is --

      GUTFELD: Because they're violent.

      WILLIAMS: -- because they have the power to change the national narrative and to elect not only Obama, but to elect Democrats in this country.
      Williams nails it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dhertzfe (November 05, 2011 12:35 am ET)
      10 1
      3,000 incidents of violence, rapes, attacks .... is there a link please? Faux bimbo over exaggerating for spice of news.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dhertzfe (November 05, 2011 12:38 am ET)
      17 1
      Because of OWS.... the banks are stopping the monthly ATM card fees. After this weekend, there will other changes within the banks when they lose their accounts to local banks and credit unions. It was reported in one city where the credit union has doubled their monthly new accounts already. Change is a coming.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by penfan (November 05, 2011 9:09 am ET)
        13  
        650,000 new credit union members

        I'd say that is something significant...cannot wait to hear what happens on move your money day.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by riverdog (November 07, 2011 7:10 pm ET)
          2 1
          i think the boa fee and transfer to credit unions was done more by facebook and other internet plans than ows.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (November 07, 2011 11:50 am ET)
          7
        LOL OWS had absolutely nothing to do with that. The loss of customers did that, pesky free market in action not a few hippy loser protesters.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (November 07, 2011 12:21 pm ET)
          4  
          HiLir

          You are far too stupid for anyone to take your baseless assertions seriously. Pesky brainwashed MORONS like you just spew whatever you are told to think
          Report Abuse
    • Author by bobberino (November 05, 2011 1:20 am ET)
         
      You know, I think the last Queen of France summed up the anti OWS sentiment best - they can just eat cake.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Guest01 (November 05, 2011 3:14 am ET)
         
      My comments are forsaken. Trickle down isn't working.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by graham7720731 (November 05, 2011 8:12 am ET)
         
      OWS is a nightmare for Fox. Good for Williams battling the loathsome four.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Virgil_Kane (November 05, 2011 10:12 am ET)
      15  
      NEWS FLASH...if you work as hard as you can...you still won't make as much as the ultra rich does. The lie of the past two decades.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (November 06, 2011 1:40 am ET)
        10  
        One can work hard, be very smart, get advanced degrees in hard science and still get paid little more than minimum wage based upon the hours you work. And oh, still can't find a full time paying job that isn't merely a glorified student stipend.

        See comments on the NY Times Story Why Science Majors Change Their Minds .

        I have a PhD in biology, I'm working on my third post-doc, and i have multiple publications in high profile journals. I'm currently on the job market for tenure-track professor positions, and the situation is bleak! This is a horrible job market, and it is made worse by the compression of leftover PhD's who couldn't find jobs during their last 1-4 years of searching.


        Meanwhile, Kim Kardashian scores $17 million profit on her faux wedding!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Rsw58 (November 05, 2011 10:47 am ET)
      7  
      Williams is the only sane person in the bunch. I love how the rest of them think that the way to solve our economic problems is with more tax cuts & less regulation. Uhh we tried that remember and it didn't work. In fact it almost caused a major world-wide depression. But these bozo's think more tax cuts and deregulation will do the trick this time. Idiots!
      The truth is the the wingnuts are scared to death of the OWS movement so they will do anything they can to smear them--say that they are "violent", "lazy" and "communists." The wingnut hold on America is cracking and they know it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Martinking68 (November 05, 2011 12:01 pm ET)
      11  
      Perino is such a tool. Her answer to growing income inequality and growing lack of opportunity is more corporate tax breaks and a flat tax that increases the burden on the poor and lessens it on the rich? How can any viewers be so stupid to buy this.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (November 06, 2011 1:41 am ET)
        7  
        Perino is so stupid she doesn't even know she's a tool! Not only doesn't she know US history, she can't even do basic math.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by flounder (November 05, 2011 12:30 pm ET)
      11 1
      When a sexist jerk like Juan Williams is the closest thing to a "voice of reason" you have going for you, you got problems. I hope Fox increases the exposure of this Eric Bolling fellow. His aura of unpleasantness and buffoonery can only help push people toward liberalism.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (November 05, 2011 1:26 pm ET)
        9 1
        I'd say you're three for three, but they only allow me one upthumb.
        ~
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (November 05, 2011 2:50 pm ET)
      14 1

      Occupy Wall Street is not about Jesse Jackson, it's a leaderless people powered movement for democracy.

      And it's not about "income equality" or redistribution, it's about fighting back against the corrosive power of major banks and multinational corporations over the democratic process, and the role of Wall Street in creating an economic collapse that has caused the greatest recession in generations.

      The guy cited in the item as being a "voice of reason" is instead nothing but a Fox hack whose job is to misinform you about what Occupy Wall Street is, and to misinterpret it as being variously about Jesse Jackson (a controversial and even disliked and mistrusted public showboat) and also about "income equality" and the redistribution of wealth.

      It's not about that, and the Fox hack in question is not a "voice of reason", he's every bit as much a shill for corporate and Republican interests as are the rest of the Fox lineup... he's a house ape.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lizinbklyn (November 07, 2011 12:46 pm ET)
        2  
        WOW, you hit the nail right on their RWer pointy heads . .

        THUMBS UP, THUMBS UP, THUMBS UP . .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eddiedoo (November 05, 2011 3:42 pm ET)
         
      And there are repercussions for our free expressions of our opinions. I have always been on this side and I have never found work. Never employed but for 2 weeks here and there and now I have been unemployed for 12 years since a part time job through financial aid when I went back to school in 1999. I wonder if it is background checks that keep me from work?
      I participated in the Haiphong protest in Gainesville in 1972 and I have written letters to my local newspaper in support of marijuana legalization and other liberal issues. It's clearn which side I'm on. Is this why traditional employers have nothing for me?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kamrom (November 05, 2011 6:27 pm ET)
      8  
      Astounding. This happens every now and then. For just a few minutes, you can see the real human break through. Megyn Kelly stands up to stop the others at Fox from bullying and attacking people for being who they are. Williams stands up to his lying cohosts and pointing out the legitimacy of the OWS movement. Then pointing out the reason they make such absurd claims.

      I rarely agree with either of these folks, and doubt it will come up as often as it should.

      But sometimes...Sometimes...The real person breaks through. I hope the rest of the fox news folks have such a person inside.

      Sometimes, its hard to see. And sometimes, it happens so fast and so hard, that it leaves me astonished.

      Theres a lot to disagree with OWS about -- I say that as someone who supports it fully; very rarely are things perfect. There are very legitimate problems, or at least, things that could be legitimate problems, within OWS. Rape and violence are NOT among them.

      And im glad the humanity in Williams let him fight back against the ceaseless, baseless attacks of his cohosts.

      Its hard to remember...very hard. But this is a good reminder, that deep inside, these are still human beings.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nothingtoseehere (November 06, 2011 12:39 am ET)
        6  
        Not to be a complete cynic, but while I'm glad to see these rare occurrences take place I think they are part of the script. Or more specifically, they are part of an overall shift in business model. I recently read something about a big wig advising Murdoch that FOX had gone too far to the fringe right and it was going to hurt their business. As the the Tea Party fades, I suspect the higher ups are loosening the reigns a bit, or even encouraging dissent, to woo a broader audience.

        Conspiracy theories aside, I fully agree with you that it's good to remember that these are still human beings. It's the only way to maintain a constructive approach when engaging someone with a very different point of view.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (November 06, 2011 1:44 am ET)
          2 1
          No, they're not on script. That pap you read about Rupert is complete misdirection. Look at the evidence not his words (or the words attributed to him)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pete x tp (November 05, 2011 8:56 pm ET)
      11  
      Funny. The crack team at FAUX"news" didn't find this bit that seems to be in every story about the one (1, uno, ein) credible reported sexual assault.

      Other sexual assaults have been rumored to occur in Zuccotti Park, prompting the movement's General Assembly to release a statement condemning the attacks and offering support to the survivors.

      "OWS exists within a broader culture where sexual assault is egregiously common: someone in the US is sexually assaulted every 2 minutes, most assaults are never reported, and most rapists are never held to account," the statement reads. "We are creating and sharing strategies that educate and transform our community into a culture of consent, safety, and well-being. At OWS, these strategies currently include support circles, counseling, consent trainings, safer sleeping spaces, self-defense trainings, community watch, awareness campaigns, and other evolving community-based processes to address harm."


      Now for Ms. Gullyfoul. Her repeated assertions about "rapes and 3,000 incidents" can only be interpreted as a ploy to rile up enough hatred at the protestors to cause some Reichwhiner to snap and open fire on the crowd. Come to think of it, the efforts to portray the protestors as rapists and sexual deviants is straight out of the civil rights movement in the 60s. Whether or not she's smart enough to know; she is responding to the OWS movement exactly the way that her Reichwing foremothers reacted to the civil rights movement.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (November 06, 2011 1:52 am ET)
        9  
        It's classic DISINFORMATION (a translation of the Russian word dezinformatsiya) is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. For this reason, it is synonymous with and sometimes called black propaganda. It is an act of deception and false statements to convince someone of untruth. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false. (source Wikipedia)

        Read up on the old Soviet internal media and this is exactly what they did. Faux Noise is just Pravda and Tass.

        They don't need to "rile up enough hatred", they merely need to smear the OWS movement so people don't want to associate with OWS. By the time the low information voters are told the truth they won't trust it because they've been conditioned.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by PBVV (November 06, 2011 11:38 am ET)
          3  
          Kimberly was heading out for lunch, as she does everyday, promptly at 1pm.
          Being the good bossman that Roger is, he knows the habitual idiosycrocies of all his television personalities. How could he exploit them to his advantage without that knowledge?
          So, today he made sure to "just bump into" Kimberly in the hallway as she left for lunch.

          Roger: Hey Kim, headed out for lunch?

          Kimbers: Yes Mr. Ailes.

          Roger: Well be sure to keep your distance from the OWS crowds. There is a steady daily increase in the numbers of rapes and other violent crimes being perpetrated by OWS protesters.

          Kimbers: Wow, I had no idea...
          Thank you for the warning Mr Ailes!


          Roger: No problem Kim. Have safe and pleasant lunch.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by JokerzRWild (November 06, 2011 11:18 am ET)
        7  
        I tried a quick google search of "Zuccotti rape", and no kidding, but almost all of the hits were other Fox or random blog/commentary spots from the vast Right Wing. I really had to filter out those and try to find something more moderate.

        I finally found this from WPIX 11. It looks like this dude isn't even an OWS protestor....just a random perv. Unfortunately for OWS, FOX & their ilk ramp this up, and Bloomberg tries to use it as an excuse to get rid of the protestors.

        If it is true that the OWS protestors just chased this guy away and 'handled it internally', that's suspicious, but judging by the way the NYPD and the NY mayor's office has been handling the protestors lately, I can understand their suspicion, and trying to avoid the police.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nfender85 (November 05, 2011 9:35 pm ET)
         
      Go Juan, a man that speaks the truth! Why are we not all voting for Ron Paul? He is a decent, honest, and extremely intelligent man that can get our country back on track... Why do we not learn from our mistakes and continue to vote for corruption and disgrace (Mitt Romney, Herman Cain, and Rick Perry). Ron Paul does not flip flop and people are scared because he is honest? It scares me that we vote for flip floppers and have no clue what grand scheme they have planned...VOTE RON PAUL 2012!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hugamoose (November 06, 2011 12:25 am ET)
         
      Did I hear somebody correctly when they said that Occupy Wall Street cannot be compared to the civil rights movement because there is far more violence present in these protests? This is outrageous. I seem to remember hearing about a specific day named in remembrance of such comparable violence. This day being Bloody Sunday. I also remember the demonstrations being divided into two groups, the peaceful protesters, and the non-peaceful protesters. This is common in any protests. Just because a group of extremists would like their voice to be heard by breaking the law in the name of change does not mean this is the message of the people involved in the movement. That is like saying everyone of the Islamic faith are evil and full of hatred because of the 9/11 attacks. Come on people, stop letting yourselves be brainwashed by the media, take a look around you. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. not only lead protests in hope of equal rights. He had a dream of something much bigger. As a matter of fact before he was assassinated he had written a sermon that was to be presented to his church about the unequal distribution of income and wealth. He never had the opportunity to present this sermon but this was not new to him. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “reconstruction of society itself is the real issue to be faced.” It is unfortunate that this is still the case. Fox News should be ashamed of putting these ignoramuses on the air.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Guest01 (November 07, 2011 11:05 am ET)
         
      These "shows" are just there to sell advertising. The sky is blue, I pay someone to swear that it isn't and show you poll numbers and bring on other people who agree with them. , wow!
      Report Abuse