About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Discussing Occupy Wall Street, Coulter Says: "It Just Took A Few Shootings At Kent State To Shut That Down"

November 26, 2011 2:36 pm ET by Leslie Rosenberg & Adam Shah

As San Francisco Weekly and others have noted, while discussing Occupy Wall Street on November 17, Ann Coulter stated: "So at the moment anyway, I mean I don't know what's going to happen in New York today, but at the moment I'm not really worried of a movement like SDS which really swept a lot of the college campuses taking over. Of course if it does, just remember the lesson from my book: it just took a few shootings at Kent State to shut that down for good."

SUSSMAN: I wanted to ask you this morning, you wrote this book almost as if you knew this movement was going to break loose.

COULTER: Yes, yeah the FBI ought to be looking into me. I mean, I knew there would be mob uprisings again, it -- they are, they are demonic thus the title of my book. We will always have the demonic among us. There will always be evil in the world. I did not anticipate that it would happen actually while I was on my book tour. Because -- but, it's been awhile since there's been something at least as broad as this, fortunately so far not as frightening or threatening as the weathermen or SDS, and it's hard to imagine how it could be in today's America.

Maybe it's just my sunny optimism, but I just feel like there's so much -- America is in a much, much better place now than it was historically with the internets, with talk radio, with Fox News.

SUSSMAN: Right.

COULTER: It was so easy for the liberals to control a large part of the country. I mean you always did have the silent majority as Nixon called it, but I just think it's easy for the silent -- easier for the silent majority to communicate with one another now. And thus, for example, instead of speaking in abstract terms, with the Occupy Wall Street, I mean I'm sure you've been online. All these kids with flipcams are out there filming the Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Oakland, and I'm sure occupy -- I bet I can find a video of what you were just describing, which sounds horrible, and I'm sorry about your bank by the way, and people can see for themselves and get the news they want themselves.

So at the moment anyway, I mean I don't know what's going to happen in New York today, but at the moment I'm not really worried of a movement like SDS which really swept a lot of the college campuses --

SUSSMAN: Yes.

COULTER: -- taking over. Of course if it does, just remember the lesson from my book: it just took a few shootings at Kent State to shut that down for good. And despite the Neil Young song --

SUSSMAN: Right.

COULTER: -- and every single article on Nexis/Lexis, those protests were -- I mean that must have been a very frightening time without the silent majority being able to communicate with one another via email, the Internet --

SUSSMAN: Yes.

COULTER: -- talk radio. And you know, those kids, the ones who started the Kent State riots was Bill Ayers' best friend and according to Ayers, homosexual lover. He ended up blowing himself up in that townhouse in Greenwich Village when they were trying to blow up army recruits -- a dance for army recruits and their dates. They were running through Kent State smashing jewelry store windows, burning the ROTC building to the ground, and when the firemen showed up, they threw rocks at the firemen, they slashed the fire trucks' hoses. This was really out of hand -- it wasn't some peace [unintelligible], you know, peace, love not war --

SUSSMAN: Right.

COULTER: -- rally, and also, according to the recent reporting by James Rosen, the National Guard may have been shot upon first. But the point is, these kids never realized that they couldn't go run around burn down a building and get anything from -- but praise from the mainstream media.

SUSSMAN: Wow, wow.

COULTER: This is the first time they got bullets back, and that put an end --

SUSSMAN: That was the end.

COULTER: -- to the protests pretty quickly. [emphases added]

Sadly, this is hardly the first time that Coulter has fantasized about the killing of her political enemies. It's not even the first time she invoked the Kent State massacre to do so. 

In June, Coulter went on Fox News' Hannity and said: "There was the shooting at Kent State and gosh, I know, liberals don't like it and you look on Nexis and oh, the whole country was embarrassed. We'll I'm not embarrassed. That's what you do with a mob."

In August 2009, Coulter told Sean Hannity that White House adviser Ezekiel Emanuel "is on my death list."

In August 2006, Coulter wrote a column on then-Sen. Lincoln Chafee's (R-RI) race for re-election that she headlined: "They Shot the Wrong Lincoln."

In July 2006, after radio host Melanie Morgan asserted that if then-New York Times executive editor Bill Keller were convicted of treason for publishing leaked information she "would have no problem with him being sent to the gas chamber." Coulter wrote: "I prefer a firing squad, but I'm open to a debate on the method of execution. A conviction for treason would be assured under any sensible legal system." That same day, during an appearance on the radio, Coulter again suggested that New York Times staff members should be "executed."

In a January 2006 appearance at Philander Smith College in Little Rock, Arkansas, Coulter said of then-Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: "We need somebody to put rat poison in Justice Stevens's créme brulée." Coulter attempted to explain away her remark as "just a joke, for you in the media."

In 2001, two days after the 9-11 attacks, Coulter wrote on National Review Online: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war." Those comments, and Coulter's subsequent reaction to the controversy over them led to Coulter's column being dropped from National Review Online.

In a 1998 book, Coulter argued that the national debate during the Monica Lewinsky controversy should not have focused on whether Clinton "did it," but "whether to impeach or assassinate" him. The quotation appeared in Coulter's 1998 book High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case against Bill Clinton. She later asserted that her suggestion came in the context of a description of "the entire history of impeachment, which we got from the British. I explained how we changed it here in America. In Britain ... one of the punishments [for impeachment] was hanging."

Yet, Coulter remains a darling of Fox News. Indeed, Hannity interviewed Coulter as recently as November 15 and on the November 16 edition of Fox News' The Five, co-host Eric Bolling, while disagreeing with an argument Coulter had made, described her as "a good friend of mine. A brilliant, conservative commentator." (Transcript via Nexis.)

Is there anything Coulter could say that would cause Fox to stop giving her airtime?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 2:46 pm ET)
      39  
      Yes Ann you disgusting soulsick demon from hell. If you are that desperate to stop a protest and assure Americans do not see its message just murder a few protesters publicly and in cold blood and it might work to end that protest. Those who sow the wind will reap the worldwind however
      Report Abuse
      • Author by donwelty (November 26, 2011 6:39 pm ET)
        28  
        After reading the transcript, I agree with you. "Disgusting" is the first word that came to my mind. Let's suppose that there were a major incident like the Chinese Tien An Men Square incident. Suppose that it happened in, say, Times Square in New York. Suppose that the shooters were Teabaggers, instead of the army since I think the US army has more sense than the Chinese government. My guess is that Ann would have cheered. That woman is, stating it somewhat redundantly, disgusting.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by usp (November 27, 2011 10:15 am ET)
          12 1
          she needs to appear with one of those red laser sites on her forehead.

          even if she wasn't killed, maybe it would be a sign the coffee was done.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by wizbing (November 27, 2011 8:35 pm ET)
        11  
        Yes, she is a sick soul, but she is not sincere in anything she says publicly. Sales of her books are probably falling so she needs to get people shouting about her again by making an outrageous statement.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (November 28, 2011 6:25 pm ET)
          3  
          I knew there would be mob uprisings again, it -- they are, they are demonic thus the title of my book. We will always have the demonic among us.


          Outrageous, but her act has played itself out as far as it can go. There is nothing left to do after you literally and without irony, demonize your opponents.

          She's slipped into an even more grotesque and shamefully unaware self parody.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by firstman (November 26, 2011 2:52 pm ET)
      38  
      The deaths of a few protesters would only lead to more protests. Ann must be high on something if she thinks it's the other way around.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 2:57 pm ET)
        30  
        True its not like the shootings at Kent State shut down the whole anti War movement
        Report Abuse
        • Author by reriding (November 26, 2011 3:08 pm ET)
          30  
          In fact Kent State only served to inflame tensions all over the country. I was arrested at a demontration at the University of Utah after those shootings in Ohio, and who can forget the CSNY lyric "Four Dead in Ohio."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 3:19 pm ET)
            27 2
            True and it was what about two weeks later that similar shootings of students happened at Jackson St. Of course since it was a largely black college there wasnt so much outrage but its not like Kent St cowed the anti war movement.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by phlcstgan (November 26, 2011 10:31 pm ET)
            24  
            It's also completely inaccurate when she says the country was "embarrassed" by Kent State. There was a creepy amount of public support for what the National Guard did.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by PBVV (November 27, 2011 11:28 am ET)
        19  
        The negative actions that politicians and police have already taken against the protesters has not weakened the movement, it has galvanized the movement. Made it stronger, more durable and less vulnerable in the face of all the actions to erode it.

        People like Coulter believe that violent physical assault using military tactics is how the state should react and deal with The Rights political opponents who go out and exercise their Constitutional Rights to assemble peacefully to exercise their rights to free speech.

        The Right is freaking out over the peaceful assembly of the Occupy Movement.

        Could you imagine their shrieking if those in the Occupy Movement who are strong 2nd Amendment proponents were to gather peacefully and legally while openly bearing firearms of all types and calibers, as members of the Tea party did??


        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 26, 2011 3:03 pm ET)
      29  
      These people don't see lives, despite being "pro-life"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by curiousindependent (November 26, 2011 7:30 pm ET)
        23  
        They are only "pro-life" until you are actually born. After that, they are extremely anti-life
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (November 26, 2011 3:03 pm ET)
      17 5
      She/he sure has a chip on her broad shoulders.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (November 27, 2011 10:02 am ET)
        6 3
        Oh, sorry, I meant to say that she has a large chip on his shoulders.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (November 27, 2011 11:54 am ET)
          7 1
          Work with me.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (November 27, 2011 12:08 pm ET)
            13 2
            Ha!

            Actually we need to determine if Ann qualifies to even be classified as a human being before we get to the bottom of this conundrum.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (November 27, 2011 12:14 pm ET)
              9 1
              Hey, pizza is now classified as a vegetable. Anything is possible. ;-)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kabniel (November 27, 2011 2:02 pm ET)
                11  
                My money is on some type of slime mold
                Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne1 (November 27, 2011 4:59 pm ET)
                  7 1
                  I'm gonna wager that perhaps she's an encruster, i.e., a barnacle, since they live in shallow waters, attaching themselves permanently to hard (right wing) substrates.

                  Hmmmn, perhaps I'm over thinking this a tad, but WTH. ;-)
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (November 26, 2011 3:33 pm ET)
      25  
      Maybe it's just my sunny optimism


      So says the blackest of the black hearts.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 26, 2011 5:10 pm ET)
        23  
        Come on, be fair, you didn't see her tender expression of empathy toward Sussman ?

        I'm sorry about your bank...


        You're just looking at her cavalier attitude toward taking human lives, her compassionate side comes out when it's a building full of money that's attacked.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (November 26, 2011 5:33 pm ET)
          15  
          Except if said building is the head quarters of a newspaper she does not approve of.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 26, 2011 5:45 pm ET)
            15  
            Still, I'd bet if she had the chance to attack, say, The NY Times, she'd go with the neutron bomb. She could make some nice tenements for people who "have no business owning a home".
            Report Abuse
        • Author by karenkat (November 27, 2011 4:20 pm ET)
          5  
          Well, of course! Corporations are people, and by extension, the bank was weally, weally hurt! Bad bad bank-injurers.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mathazar (November 26, 2011 3:34 pm ET)
      34  
      Wow where does one begin ? She's dead wrong on so many things. The Kent State shootings were a big factor in changing public opinion of the war. And not just in America. There were protests all over the world. The UK, Australia, etc. Just like the occupy protests have spread worldwide.

      What kind of evil sociopath rejoices in the execution of innocent
      Americans exercising their freedom of assembly and speech ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by montanabuddha (November 26, 2011 3:54 pm ET)
        21  
        You got it man.

        When the photos from the Kent State Massacre hit the major magazines public opinion took a hard left turn.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by canaanxing9025 (November 26, 2011 4:14 pm ET)
        21  
        mathazar:

        "What kind of evil sociopath rejoices in the execution of innocent Americans exercising their freedom of assembly and speech?"

        What kind of evil sociopath? Good question. What Coulter curiously omitted was American citizens were murdered by National Guardsmen.
        The same National Guardsmen who probably joined the Guard in the first place to avoid the draft and sent to Vietnam.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 4:30 pm ET)
          19  
          Ann, as usual tells a lot of lies in her dishonest diatribe. Like claiming that the Weathermen were going to blow up recruits and their dates. The truth of course is that the Weathermen never ONCE killed or injured a single person with their bombs. Also that the guardsmen were shot at by the protesters. There isnt the SLIGHTEST evidence that the protesters shot at anybody. However there IS speculation about the FBI informant at the protest, this from Wiki

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

          Further analysis of the audiotape revealed that four pistol shots and a violent confrontation occurred approximately 70 seconds before the National Guard opened fire. According to The Plain Dealer, this new analysis raised questions about the role of Terry Norman, a Kent State student who was an FBI informant and known to be carrying a pistol during the disturbance


          Now COINTELPRO was absolute PROOF that the left organizations were being infiltrated by FBI and that these agents were acting as provocatuers who were trying to goad these groups into acts of violence and illegal activity. So Annie is just a liar she has no evidence whatsoever that even if shots WERE fired, and that isnt proven, that they were from the protesters. There is NO question that those killed were not any danger to the guardsmen
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 26, 2011 5:15 pm ET)
            25  
            the Weathermen never ONCE killed or injured a single person with their bombs.


            But they damaged real estate, something of value, not young Americans. That's why I picked out her comment on the bank above, Annie is the perfect face of the right wing today. They care about life, as long as it involves controlling reproduction, but as soon as that babies popped out, like a new car driven off the lot, it's losing value.

            It's all money, things and stuff to these right wing "Christians", the idea that average Americans are starting to stand up to their scam has to be "Evil".
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 7:27 pm ET)
              22  
              One of the bedrock principles of my political philosophy is that property doesnt have rights. Only people have rights. I cannot fathom people caring more about money or valuable THINGS than people. It never ceases to amaze me how utterly different I am than people like Annie. A fact I am exceedingly proud of
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MickD (November 26, 2011 11:25 pm ET)
                16 11
                Okay Kabs, then start respecting people by not calling them stupid in capital letters every time you disagree with them in a a debate.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MickD (November 26, 2011 11:28 pm ET)
                  9 6
                  BTW I gave you a thumbs up for your statement.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by kabniel (November 27, 2011 12:13 am ET)
                    11 16
                    BTW you can still bite me and you still dont get to tell me what to do
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by usp (November 27, 2011 10:26 am ET)
                      4  
                      nope- that's MY job! I GET TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT TO DO!


                      okay, well, maybe not. Maybe we should all yield to mary- she seems the most adult in the room ;)
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by Boswell (November 27, 2011 11:24 am ET)
                      11 2
                      seriously, board scolds are the most boring people with real self-esteem issues and should get the F**K over themselves
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by kabniel (November 27, 2011 12:12 am ET)
                  9 16
                  bite me Mick. I dont do requests. The fact property doesnt have rights doesnt delete MY right to express myself as I darn well please. Take your control issues and shove them where the Sun never shines you STUPID, stupid cretin
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MickD (November 27, 2011 6:23 am ET)
                    7 11
                    Wow, I've never seen the truth told so immediately.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by kabniel (November 27, 2011 2:11 pm ET)
                      11 1
                      There was no truth in that. I was just being a jerk, since you were, and taking the opportunity to put stupid in capital letters. This isnt up to you. How I post. In a troll free thread where I had no reason to be the way you are scolding me for being. I dont need a pious schoolmaarm or a room protocol manager. When I do I will let you know. People I treat that way have no interest in discussion. They are telling lies or being jerks for the provocation value alone. They dont deserve any better treatment.

                      If you disagree, fine, dont treat them that way but you are not my mother and dont get to tell me what to do. This is a tactic. I am well aware of what I am doing. They come in to poke at us, to treat us with contempt they are getting it back from me. I WILL fight fire with fire. I wont take their abuse or watch them lie about the left or my liberal friends and just bite my tongue. I have my reasons for being this way. Ones I have written about many times before and you have been around long enough to know what they are.

                      You arent going to change my mind so just annoying me about it isnt going to do you any good
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by datruthfarmer (November 27, 2011 2:51 am ET)
                  11 2
                  MickD,

                  Did you know that there is a High School Principal from the State of Kansas that misses the point just like you do?


                  Report Abuse
                • Author by jonimacaroni1 (November 28, 2011 11:02 am ET)
                  3 4
                  "MickD" says

                  Okay Kabs, then start respecting people by not calling them stupid in capital letters every time you disagree with them in a a debate.


                  But "kabniel" doesn't do that, and it's ignorant to suggest that he does! He doesn't call people he disagrees with 'stupid.' He calls people who are trolls, posting here to inflame the conversation and distract from the actual topic 'stupid.'

                  It has nothing to do with "kabniel" disagreeing with people, and then calling those he disagrees with 'stupid.' And it's stupid to think that he does that!

                  And, of course, "kabniel" is right - "MickD" doesn't get to tell anyone else how to interact with the trolls. And if you'll notice, we've seen a lot fewer of them recently, and that's a direct result of people who figure out that they shouldn't be interacting with the trolls as though they were trying to be part of a discussion, because they aren't!
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by Boswell (November 27, 2011 11:30 am ET)
                11  
                being polite to lying morons is at least a part of why FAUX is still de-educating so many people
                Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (November 27, 2011 2:11 pm ET)
          10  
          I was on a national tour (Hamlet & Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead) when the massacre took place. Played Kent State and a number of other locations where guys I'd served with (I got out in 68) lived. A number of them came to the show, including one who lived in Zanesville, Ohio, who came to Kent. We were all shaken and horrified by the killings, and it was our opinion (accurate or not, I don't know) that Regular Army troops wouldn't have panicked (if that's what it was) and done that. Now I was the furthest left of these guys by a mile, but not one, NOT ONE, of us could stomach what had happened.

          And guess what, any Baggers who are visiting: Even though I think that your protests are misguided at best, and are destructive to the country, I would be just as horrified to see you shot down as I was to see them.
          I've seen Coultergeist advocate the shooting of liberals enough to exempt her from that. A 25 caliber hole in her forehead would seem like poetic justice to me.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by heehee..santorum (November 27, 2011 2:29 pm ET)
            10  
            Ms. Coulter I do not believe has actually thought out the actual ramifications of her misguided/intentionally evil provocations. She is banking on the same hole-card as Rush and Glenn, that being personal security details and the lame "that is my stock in trade" excuse. I try to remain disengaged the best I can from the vileness that spews out of these folks, but not all folks can and not all folks WILL. Any confrontations either verbal or otherwise that may befall Ms. Coulter and her ilk are well overdue, IMHO.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (November 27, 2011 3:59 pm ET)
            15  
            I had just returned home a short time before the shootings at Kent State. The rules for infantrymen in Vietnam stated that you could be subject to arrest if caught with a round in the chamber. I'm sure the rules for the NG serving within the US were even more restrictive. Who gave the order for them to chamber rounds?

            All of my friends who served in Vietnam, whether on the left or right, were equally appalled that American troops killed American citizens for expressing their rights under the First Amendment.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by anitamurie (November 26, 2011 6:41 pm ET)
        14  
        No Kiding . Where does one begin. Once again filled Anne Coulter's hate filled diatribes are filled with outright LIES:
        Coulter:-"And you know, those kids, the ones who started the Kent State riots was Bill Ayers' best friend and according to Ayers, homosexual lover. He ended up blowing himself up in that townhouse in Greenwich Village when they were trying to blow up army recruits -- a dance for army recruits and their dates. They were running through Kent State smashing jewelry store windows, burning the ROTC building to the ground, and when the firemen showed up, they threw rocks at the firemen, they slashed the fire trucks' hoses. This was really out of hand -- it wasn't some peace [unintelligible], you know, peace, love not war --

        SUSSMAN: Right.

        COULTER: -- rally, and also, according to the recent reporting by James Rosen, the National Guard may have been shot upon first. But the point is, these kids never realized that they couldn't go run around burn down a building and get anything from -- but praise from the mainstream media

        And these are just a very few of her many samples. That woman disgusts me. As a personal note from every man I know to Ms Coulter: Give it up. They all see you as a woman desperately hanging on to youth. Besides the minute you open your loud mouth you are a total turn off.
        EMPHASIS ADDED



















        Report Abuse
        • Author by Ribelin2000 (November 26, 2011 7:12 pm ET)
          12 3
          Thanks, anita, but that last part about what every man you know thinks about Ann was completely unnecessary, since no one finds Ted Danson in drag to be attractive anyway.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by usp (November 27, 2011 10:28 am ET)
            7  
            she has no "youth" to hang on to. even when she was young the bitterness and hate soured that cherry but good.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (November 26, 2011 7:57 pm ET)
        17  
        It's yet another right wing attempt to rewrite history. The Kent State shootings were a defining moment for me -- the first time I broke with my parents political beliefs and feelings. I was 11, and I'm betting that quite a lot of others my age also can trace their first political awakening to the realization that there was something very very wrong with this picture.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by canaanxing9025 (November 26, 2011 9:10 pm ET)
          11  
          by Chameo:
          "I was 11, and I'm betting that quite a lot of others my age also can trace their first political awakenings to the realization that there was somehting very very wrong with this picture."

          Interesting that you say that you were 11 years old. I was twelve when President Kennedy was assinated. It is a young'uns time when their whole perception of saftey changes. We begin to realise that the world is a bit more complex than as children we knew. Our preceptions change.
          We now have a place in history. I remember my Dad talking me when I was about seven.."well about twenty years ago". I thought the world didn't exist (as far as I was concerned) twenty years ago.
          I had no idea what he was talking about.
          We cannot reinvent what went before us - all we can hope to do, is by increments make it better.
          There is a great song in Les Miserables "One More Day"
          Report Abuse
    • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 3:39 pm ET)
      24  
      For all the false equivalance arguements from the right the left just has no equivalent of Ann Coulters evil. There is no prominent lefty out there saying the message of the Coulters and Hannitys and Limbaughs is so offensive and un-American someone should just murder a few of them to shut them up. If there were the screaming and snivelling from the right would be so loud it would knock the Earth off its axis
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Turkeysocks (November 26, 2011 4:38 pm ET)
        15  
        Ya know, Hannity, Coulter and Limbaugh remind me of my kid sis/bro.

        Why? Because whenever I call them out for something, they yell and scream over me when I am talking normally. Heck, can't even criticize them for ANYTHING.

        Just like those three. You cannot criticize them regardless of what they say. It's always "Oh, I was joking" or "You took me out of context".

        Heck, if one of these guys did turn up murdered, I wouldn't be surprised honestly. Why? Because go to some of those right wing sites. Look what they say. I've read some comments about how "Tame" those three have "become". And how they need to "start telling it as it is" or "get off the air willingly or else".

        Of course I don't believe that any of those idiots would actually do anything. At least not yet. The people who bark the most are the ones you don't have to worry about, it's the silent ones.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ThomasJH268 (November 26, 2011 5:02 pm ET)
      19  
      Does that mean all it will take is a few bullets to shut the tea party down?

      OWS are not the terrorists, is the people who laught at people being pepper sprayed, the people who claim proudly "We've got the guns" and people who dream of the police going into protests guns blazing.

      I think of the time I went to Epcot and a guest was having a problem with their ticket. The poor attendant got the brunt of his rude and vulgar language when it really wasn't the attendants fault, she was just following the rules dictated to her by her boss. I think of that analogy when I see the FOXPAC teabagger dittoheads say "Why aren't these 'fleabaggers' protesting Capital Hill" The answer is in that analogy... Because all the politicians are just doing what their paymasters tell them.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 26, 2011 5:23 pm ET)
        19  
        Speaking of the teabaggers, I always get a laugh ( and I know I repeat it a lot here) that these same clowns like Coulter who fawn over the modern (fake) Tea Party are most outraged about property damage and threats to corporate profits, as they make jokes about killing other Americans.

        The (real) Boston Tea Party was an act of trespassing and property damage, in response to favoritism towards corporate greed. I understand that Coulter and her other propagandists get paid good money to push this Orwellian crap, but how does the typical Foxbot not see that the "evil" she's railing against here is on the same side as those mythical figures in tri-corner hats that they pretend to revere ?

        I know, it was a rhetorical question, by now I know why the typical Foxbot doesn't understand sh*t, I've had enough conversations with them here.
        They're the stoopidest 1% of the country.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (November 26, 2011 5:33 pm ET)
          12  
          They're the stoopidest 1% of the country


          God I hope so. The idea there might be stupider people out there is too depressing to contemplate
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 3:00 am ET)
            7  
            I'm with ya, I hope Fox has the market cornered. OT but I came home last night, and checked on that "climategate" thread, it's pretty funny ( comments were closed). Sorry , my computer is being a little sluggish, but check it out. I won't link. That Gally clown went nuts.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 3:20 am ET)
            10  
            OK, the old desktop is going better now. Here's what i asked( on Wednesday)

            who is behind this science conspiracy, waiting to cash in ?...
            what are the specifics? Who benefits, how and when do they benefit ?


            After three days, I never got an answer. I got "government control" and "global governance" and some other tinfoil hat stuff, but nothing solid.

            I got called out
            for noting a cultists being a cultist.

            But I did see, after he whined about being outnumbered, imagining himself to be a hard-lovin', hard-fightin cartoon character, and imagining he was winning arguments, he still never answered my question.

            I wonder if he thinks it's a coincidence that Rick Perry compared himself to Galileo in that debate.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (November 27, 2011 7:27 am ET)
              8  
              Just read that thread Andy. Wow... Particularly loved the part where he declares carnage and victory. Do ya think they really believe their own victory dance?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 12:33 pm ET)
                10  
                You know, I'm never really sure, I see that a lot from the right wingers who post here, the delusional declarations of victory in the wake of abject failure.

                It may just be a little self-help pep talk, they've been trained by their propaganda masters ( and probably their coddling parents) to make everything better by telling themselves they're really special, even if they're not very successful.

                But it's possible they actually believe themselves. A little scary, but that's another thing they've been trained to think, that if they're confident and repetitious enough, that's as good as being right.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (November 27, 2011 2:17 pm ET)
                  8  
                  You know, I'm never really sure, I see that a lot from the right wingers who post here, the delusional declarations of victory in the wake of abject failure.
                  That's why I like athletes. When they celebrate a win, they've actually won.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 4:12 pm ET)
                    6  
                    I was on a softball team with a guy, not a right winger, as far as I know, probably apolitical, but he had that same level of delusion, along with a Napoleon complex.

                    While some of us carried the team by getting on base with boring singles and doubles( the way to win at softball), Shorty would swing for the fences every at-bat, almost without exception resulting in a fly-out.Once or twice a season, he'd get one by the outfielders, and relive it forever.

                    At the end of season pizza party, he'd estimate his batting average at somewhere around .850
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by worrierking (November 27, 2011 4:01 pm ET)
                  7  
                  It's only right to admit that there's at least one person on the right who admits failure since he still doesn't receive the proper greeting from store clerks during the Holiday season.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 4:20 pm ET)
                    6  
                    Is that BilldO? Has he started his holiday whining? Hadn't seen that.

                    A guy I didn't know in high school recently "friended" me on Facebook, and he's pretty consistent at posting these "anti-PC" memes that go around. Today, he wanted me to "like" his demand to return to the traditional "Merry Christmas" instead of the PC "happy Holidays".

                    Fvck off. If you want me to ignore things in emails or Facebook, please oversell ( It's the funniest/saddest/cutest/scariest thing ever in history), or challenge or dare me to like or re-post it.

                    On special speed ignore; the ones that dare me to share something along the lines of " beating up puppies is bad" or " do my real friends read all of my self-indulgent status updates?", with the frowny little closer of " If you don't, I'll understand.".
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (November 27, 2011 12:40 pm ET)
                7  
                Deldollies...Everywhere!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 1:22 pm ET)
                  9  
                  Har! That was another entertaining part of that thread, goofy's idea that anybody who was done spending their time addressing his individual points of crap must be the same person.

                  Nothing against those who still take the time to debunk his stuff, but I think Gally has that wingnut affliction that tells him that if his "information" is being noticed, even if it's being destroyed, he's being taken seriously.

                  He seems to get very irritated at those of us ( Me, Mary, various Delldollies) who just like to watch him dance around in his floppy clown shoes. Jazz Hands!!
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by kabniel (November 27, 2011 2:49 pm ET)
                    9  
                    I find Galli too boring to deal with on a continuing basis. His same old tactic of linking to endless rightwing denier sites with zero credibility and when shown to be wrong just ignore the facts saying, sure from a union leader or from a science site of bought off scientists. No source is good enough for him because they have actual scientific bona fides. Any source from any half baked denier site is golden. It is a weak and silly way to argue. I looked at an old GW thread a few days about where we were linking to the National Academy of science and the denier was poo pooing that while linking to...and I kid you not, a filmaker, Forbes and the Cato institute to support his science claims
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 4:04 pm ET)
                      9  
                      I've seen him link to a searchable data base that includes links to Prison Planet and Watts Up. He wouldn't be nearly as funny if he didn't seem convinced that he's brilliant.

                      Like others here, I got into lengthy discussions with gally in the past, until I realized he just ignored everything that proved him wrong, and just continued to go with his kitchen sink approach.

                      If you do come across old climate-related threads, notice the time-stamps. It's hilarious how consistently Gally creeps on to two or three day old threads to add sarcastic comments, questions and challenges. He's like a pseudo-intellectual donutlover.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mr. l (November 27, 2011 4:30 pm ET)
                        5  
                        I just got over reading the latest global warming thread... I had never seen galLIElow before, but after the carnage that was called 'postings' by him, I feel perversely attracted to answering his every post from now on...

                        That stuff was just brutal...
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Deluded (November 28, 2011 12:01 am ET)
                        5  
                        Off topic, but donut is up to his old tricks again sliding in at the last possible moment to put forward a cheap shot at MMFA and Kab.

                        Wonder what makes them do this stuff? They should just show up early and get it all out.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 28, 2011 12:34 am ET)
                          4  
                          Haha, these guys aren't very competent at much, but they sure do seem to have a handle on when comments close. You think donuts and Gally sit for hours testing the "reply" button, surrounded by piles of notebooks where they record average/typical closing times ?

                          That's good donuts puts extra salt on everything, he's probably losing a lot with all those tears.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by eweston8542983 (November 28, 2011 12:43 am ET)
                          2  
                          That would enter into arguing in good faith.

                          A dangerously slippery slope to donut's point of view.

                          Any possible victorylike, or paravictory point is to be clutched at, groped, dominated, and violated.

                          A position very close to too many college football programs.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by kabniel (November 28, 2011 2:05 am ET)
                            3  
                            Well lets face it. If donutguy posts while we are still there he gets slapped around so badly even someone as delusional as he is must know he is getting punked mercilessly.

                            Being a gutless coward is just what I would expect from him
                            Report Abuse
              • Author by Deluded (November 27, 2011 11:58 pm ET)
                3  
                This guy apparently does, he was so thrilled that one minute had passed between one of his posts and another and NO one gave a reply to him that he felt on top of the world with his whole superiority complex.

                Also what he mostly posted were details, but he never really put those details together into a proper argument to prove his point. He may be good at finding his material, but he is bad (or perhaps he doesn't even try) at proving any point.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (November 27, 2011 4:31 pm ET)
        6 1
        OWS are not the terrorists, is the people who laught at people being pepper sprayed

        Now where is that "dave" misanthrope? You know, the eejit deluxe that thought seeing those UC Davis kids getting pepper-sprayed wss SO awesome.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (November 27, 2011 8:10 pm ET)
          5 1
          Probably he's off inspecting some of those prisons and workhouses, and grumbling about all those poor people who live off the government.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jbrantow (November 26, 2011 5:34 pm ET)
      7 4
      It only takes one small dick to make mancoulter.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CAL (November 26, 2011 5:36 pm ET)
      14  
      I find it particularly insulting this succubus gets paid handsomely for saying such disgusting, idiotic nonsense. Talk about not getting bang for the buck. Till the Republican party makes a real effort to distance and purge themselves from the nutjobs and fascists they march in lockstep with, they can all wear the same label. Sociopaths.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by politeradical (November 26, 2011 6:37 pm ET)
      16  
      Ann is on a roll. The dripping contempt, the hatred, the condescension.

      She casually calls liberals demonic, compares OWS to SDS and the Weathermen, then ices the ugly cake by suggesting that murdering a few of them via police state fascism will make them go away.

      Ann reminds why I'm liberal and proud of it. What a piece of reptilian filth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 26, 2011 6:53 pm ET)
      13  
      Conservatives are modern day ghouls gnawing on the bones of the dead, digging up bodies to defile and demean and sodomize with ignorance, the fangs dripping with contempt for the living while pretending to harbor deep feelings for incubating potentiality, when, as we all know, there is nothing they abhor more than a survivor.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ribelin2000 (November 26, 2011 7:05 pm ET)
      5 1
      This blog really isn't saying anything new. Everyone knows Ann is a female dog, so what do you expect?

      Stop the presses indeed (sarcasm).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (November 26, 2011 7:54 pm ET)
      8  

      "Yes, yeah the FBI ought to be looking into me."

      I'll go along with that, but only if they use a proctoscope made for an elephant.

      Once again, Ann's putridity deserves a response using every possible combination of George Carlin's The Seven Words You Can't Say On TV.

      At least she's consistent.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (November 26, 2011 9:19 pm ET)
        8  
        Of all places, this blog showed up in NewsVine today. Generally there are a lot of mean spirited people that are always trashing teh libs, OWS and Obama. It appears that their trolls can't even get behind Annie on this one. It's unreal.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ronbo (November 26, 2011 9:18 pm ET)
      18  
      Two of the four killed had nothing to do with the protests - one was an ROTC student. Does Ann know that?

      The shootings resulted in a national student strike, closing hundreds of campuses. Kent State was closed for six weeks. Five days after the shootings, a crowd estimated at 100,000 people gathered to protest in Washington, DC.

      It wasn't the end of the protests. It was the beginning of the end of the war.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by usp (November 27, 2011 10:33 am ET)
        4  
        ann doesn't know much that won't bring her barrows full of cash- she doesn't need to know anything else. just ask her.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (November 26, 2011 9:40 pm ET)
      7  
      I am delighted that Media Matters is a bit up and running again. I was afraid the tryptophfairy made you all to sleepy to post.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GreenLantern (November 26, 2011 11:44 pm ET)
      9  
      I am surprised I have not seen the obligatory defense from the hate-wingers of this indefensible, disgusting, hateful, sociopathic Fascist! Maybe watching too much faux is making them even too stupid to come up with the lamest of retorts?
      I bet they are stealing money from their masters and pretending to post when they don't so they get paid more. Their morals and ethics seem to be non-existent anyway.
      And becoming a true Christian, Ann, means trying to act like one once in a while. I wonder about how you will be judged on your sincerity!
      Ann, you are truly disgusting!
      UGH!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (November 26, 2011 11:52 pm ET)
        9  
        Fox's defense of her will either be ignoring this or deflecting it elsewhere. They always do. Somehow they will become the victims of the lame stream media.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (November 27, 2011 4:33 am ET)
      12  
      This suppurating excrescence would have been right at home in the British Admiralty of the 18th Century. As Voltaire, in an allusion to the fate of Admiral John Byng in Candide put it "Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres" (...in this country, it is good to kill, from time to time, an admiral to encourage the others) or, alternately, the old "give them a whiff of grapeshot" school of public order.

      No doubt she would have sided with the British over the so-called "Boston Massacre".

      If you need firearms to maintain public order then you have a far more serious problem than public disorder - look to your society.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 1:09 pm ET)
        9  
        This is what's so baffling about the current American right wing. They pay lip service to the colonial revolutionaries, and the civil rights movement ( which they've been convinced was a conservative movement) but at every current opportunity, they side with the very forces that all of their supposed heroes were fighting.

        They only seem able to get on the right side of history once it's history.

        I imagine in a decade or two they'll be bragging about their support of the Occupy movement.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by grmce (November 27, 2011 8:09 pm ET)
          5  
          They only seem able to get on the right side of history once it's history.
          This is the inherent contradiction of most conservative movements. I believe that it was 19th Century British Tory P.M. Disraeli who described a Conservative government as "an organised hypocrisy".

          Disraeli was an early proponent of "dynamic conservatism", an oxymoron in the true sense in that whilst seeming to be a contradiction in terms, upon closer examination it actually makes sense. This, of course, was a full century before Eisenhower adopted the philosophy.

          At the moment the U.S. Republican party seems to be in the thrall of the Know Nothing element of its origins. This way lies disaster - both for the party and for the victims of its policies where enacted. There are two possible solutions for its survival 1) return to its Whiggish roots i.e. take on a more liberal caste or 2) take on the Eisenhower/Disraeli mantle of dynamic conservatism. Either would work and could enable them to at least re-enter the 20th Century and possibly make it into the 21st!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by PBVV (November 27, 2011 10:17 am ET)
      9  

      Is there anything Coulter could say that would cause Fox to stop giving her airtime?


      No. Like Coulter, The Fox Noise Collective is without conscience.

      They exist to nurture, fortify, aid, abet and give comfort to creatures of Coulter's bent & ilk.

      Fox viewers tune in everyday to suckle at the teats of The Fox Collective for the milk of the ignorant & the vile.
      'Tis a poisonous venom that flows so very abundantly from the nipples of that vixen b!tch.
      And they love every drop of it. They can't get enough of it.







      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne1 (November 27, 2011 5:24 pm ET)
        5 1
        Please don't give us vixens a bad name by associating this vile article with us, Lol!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (November 28, 2011 2:08 am ET)
          2  
          Ah julia, you and mary are two of my favorite vixens
          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (November 28, 2011 4:11 pm ET)
            3 1
            You're a lovable hellcat yourownsweetself! And I believe most here understand that you only give the rough side of your tongue when it's absolutely warranted. ;-) You know I have no truck with you calling someone on BS, stupidity and willful duplicity.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 27, 2011 11:57 am ET)
      14  
      You were nine years old when the protesters were murdered at Kent State you vile, evil, harpy.

      The shootings were the tipping point that brought even more parents, grandparents and vets into the streets to demand an end to a war that is still dividing America. Even though most of the people who still defend it weren't alive at the time or didn't have family members who served there. Many also supported the war then and now, but found ways to evade it. Some being your comrades in the hate game like Rush, O'Lielly, Nugent and Gingrich and your despicable political heroes like GWB and Cheney.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (November 27, 2011 1:15 pm ET)
        12  
        That happened just a few days before my eighth birthday, and I vaguely remember seeing the images on TV. I didn't really understand it, but I'm pretty sure I wasn't cheering on the shooting of those young people, even as a dumb kid.

        This is what passes for "strength" and "rugged individualism" with the modern wingnut, applauding the beatdown of anybody who dares to stand up to the powerful. Again, I understand a whore like Coulter saying idiotic things for a big paycheck, I just don't understand the person who isn't on the payroll who admires a piece of crap like her.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Chameo (November 27, 2011 6:53 pm ET)
          8  
          I was 11, and I remember it very distinctly. My parents argued about it at the dinner table. My dad, a Korean war vet, insisted at first that the protesters must have done something to provoke the shootings. My mother -- who usually had no use whatsoever for anti-war protesters -- was adamant that unless there was a line of kids lined up with rifles and shooting, there was no good reason for shooting into a crowd of college kids. My grandmother just sat there muttering in Italian that war was coming. And that's when it hit me that these were soldiers firing on kids just a few years older than me -- that the U.S. government was making war on its children.

          What they admire, Andy, is the snarkiness and nastiness that reminds them of the Queen Bees they all slavered over in high school and never could quite get to notice them.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mauman (November 28, 2011 12:16 am ET)
      4  
      Ann Coulter needs to release her sexual frustrations. She is an unmarried Christian. Therefore, if she has been a good Christian girl, she has never had a sexual experience of any kind. Find yourself a man, Ann.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by datruthfarmer (November 28, 2011 4:31 am ET)
      1  
      If Ann really wanted to end the Occupy protests, she could do it single handily, as she alone possess the secret weapon.

      The only safe defense from the sight of Ann Coulter's unprotected shoulder blades is a wielder's helmet with the super dark lenses. Do you have any idea how hard it would be to protest wearing wielding equipment all of the time?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (November 28, 2011 10:44 am ET)
      4  
      "We will always have the demonic among us. There will always be evil in the world."

      And she's living proof of that. What a truly horrible, awful, disgusting person she is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by foole (November 28, 2011 11:23 am ET)
      6  
      I find myself thinking of the families of the students that were shot and killed at Kent State at times like this. This has to be like someone ripping the scab off of a horrible old wound. And for no other reason than to be purposely shocking or controversial. Coulter really needs to just go away. She is no longer shocking or controversial. She is simply a heartless idiot...a droning bore. And as to what happened after Kent State, thousands of schools around the country were shut down due to student strikes and over 100,000 people gathered in Washington D.C. to protest the advance of the Viet Nam War into Cambodia. No one was deterred by the violence at Kent State. And, in fact continued protests were what many believe lead to the end of our involvement in Viet Nam. Coulter is nothing more than a braying ass these days. If she actually was ever anything more than that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CrashGordon (November 28, 2011 11:29 am ET)
      2  
      Wow. How many times have I told myself that Ann Coutler has said something so asinine, ignorant and disgusting that people will finally stop listening to her...only to be proven wrong.

      Well, here I go again. Ann Coulter has said something so asinine, ignorant and disgusting that people will finally stop listening to her. At least, they should.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 28, 2011 11:47 am ET)
      2  
      What a vile human being.

      God hates you, Ann. You know that, right?

      ---------------------------------------
      IMHO
      UTOPIA
      Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (November 28, 2011 2:14 pm ET)
      2  
      What would the right's reaction if we use the same analysis of the Tea Party movement? Any guesses?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Vesus (November 28, 2011 4:28 pm ET)
      2  
      And nobody would shed a tear if this filth caught a stray in the adam's apple.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by crazymonkeylady (November 28, 2011 9:02 pm ET)
      1  
      She is one sorry skintube.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.