About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

The Poor Christians And The Happy Poor

December 08, 2011 9:36 am ET by Simon Maloy

"WAR ON TEBOW" declared Fox News' The Five on Tuesday as the panel of four conservatives and Bob Beckel launched into a discussion of Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow and his frequent public declarations of his Christian faith. "What do you think scares the media most?" asked Eric Bolling. "The clean-cut, the conservative, or the Christian aspect of Tim Tebow?" GOP strategist Andrea Tantaros opined that "it's ridiculous to go after Tim Tebow. He can express whatever he wants and it takes a lot of courage to put Bible verses on your face."

The trials of Tebow have been well-covered by the Murdoch network. Yesterday, Fox News' unofficial culture war correspondent Todd Starnes wrote that Tebow "will always be a lightning rod for anti-Christian bigots," and expanded the narrative to declare that "it's become something of a sport to attack Christians in this nation," what with the "reprehensible anti-Christian propaganda" coming from Hollywood and the almost-beyond-parody "War on Christmas." Starnes even went so far as to compare the Tebow situation to Jim Crow.

The position of Fox News is clear: Christians in America are relentlessly persecuted and need Fox News as an advocate. The hitch, of course, is that Christianity remains the overwhelmingly dominant faith not just of the nation at large but also of the people elected to lead it. But the culture war needs to be fought, so insults aimed at a football player, store clerks saying "Happy Holidays," and similarly minor (or imagined) slights are embellished into organized campaigns of anti-Christian persecution.

That in and of itself is disingenuous, but as the network exaggerates the threat to Christianity in America, it simultaneously downplays -- even mocks -- the very real plight facing those whom Christian teachings demand be shown compassion: the poor.

Poverty in the U.S. is on the rise. Incomes are decreasing. According to the Census Bureau, right now there are over 46 million Americans in poverty, more than there have been at any time since they started publishing poverty estimates. Fifteen percent of U.S. households are "food insecure," meaning they lack money to properly feed themselves on a daily basis. They face a host of problems, both quantifiable and not: lack of access to health care, chronic underemployment, disrupted family life, and so on.

But to hear Fox News tell it, the poor don't have it so bad. Earlier this year, the conservative Heritage Foundation released a report on how the ownership of household appliances demonstrates that "most of the persons whom the government defines as 'in poverty' are not poor in any ordinary sense of the term." Seizing on Heritage's laughably superficial assessment of poverty, Bill O'Reilly asked: "How can you be so poor and have all this stuff?"

Fox News' Stuart Varney cast the report as evidence that "poor families in the United States are not what they used to be." After he was skewered by Jon Stewart, Varney responded by saying all he did was tell the "truth about poor people." According to Varney: "The image we have of poor people as starving and living in squalor really is not accurate. Many of them have things, what they lack is the richness of spirit. That's my opinion."

This past July on The Five, Monica Crowley, after ticking off a list of all the appliances poor people own, asked Andrea Tantaros: "What does it tell you about being poor in the United States?" Tantaros replied: "It sounds pretty good to me. I'm trying to make it in Manhattan. I have a microwave and a TV. I guess I'm poor in Obamanation."

When the National Bureau of Economic Research released a study on the extent to which government programs keep millions of Americans from sinking deeper into poverty, Fox Business Network's Charles Payne castigated the poor for not being ashamed of their poverty: "There's no doubt that these are good programs. I think the real narrative here, though, is that people aren't embarrassed by it. People aren't ashamed by it." Payne would later offer this mocking explanation for poverty in America: "After everyone's eaten their Thanksgiving meal, right, go to Wal-Mart at midnight. You're going to see why a lot of people don't have money. They're going to take their welfare checks and bum-rush the security guard, knock him down, and give away all their money."

It's a striking contrast. One day Fox News will defend Christians from the faith-killing scourge of Rhode Island "Holiday Trees," and the next they'll mock those in need for having refrigerators but lacking "spirit." They'll insist on protecting the right to say Christian prayers in public, and attack a poor person for spending all their money at Wal-Mart. It's a clash of faith and politics that does double harm by hyping illusory threats to an empowered majority while obfuscating real problems plaguing the millions of Americans most in need of a little Christian charity.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Boswell (December 08, 2011 9:57 am ET)
      9 2
      the plain fact is that NOBODY gets to be quite as much a demonstrative zealot as Tebow has become without an awful lot of really bad "sins" for him to try to run away from and try to get some gawd to forgive because no one else will...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (December 08, 2011 9:59 am ET)
      12 3
      The righteous are usually the ones with big time skeletons in their closet.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (December 08, 2011 10:19 am ET)
      14 1
      Tim Tebow's a football player. Who cares about his religion? I know I don't, one way or the other.

      His beliefs are his business.

      I will say I don't believe he will continue to have success on the field. Defenses will figure out how to stop him. He doesn't have a quick release, isn't accurate, and will (sad to say) inevitably get hurt given the number of times he's carrying the ball per game.

      But at this point, his record speaks for itself. The Broncos are winning games, and he is their starting quarterback. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is that.

      There is no "war" (the usual Fox metaphor, again, for anything and everything they criticize) on Christianity in general or Tim Tebow in particular. Anything for ratings, I guess, though, literally anything, no matter how bogus.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by usp (December 08, 2011 10:34 am ET)
        15 1
        david- for a minute? strip away the religion from teabow- now? replace it with 'queer'. or 'socialism'.

        now- replay all those interview and on field feeds- and then read the above again- can you imagine the foxmelt as their horror crested?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Chameo (December 08, 2011 3:29 pm ET)
          9 1
          Honestly, I was so thinking exactly that. Imagine them blowing a gasket if Tebow were openly wearing a rainbow armband and giving interviews about how he's persecuted for having a boyfriend.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by CoolSlaw (December 08, 2011 5:52 pm ET)
            8 1
            This whole Tim Tebow thing baffles me.

            First of all, who has been attacking his Christianity?

            Secondly, what position above multi-million dollar earning quarterback for an NFL team was he trying out for and denied because of his faith?

            This "culture war" nonsense is where the right seeks refuge when they're losing the mainstream on economics and poor leadership.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Unreality (December 08, 2011 8:07 pm ET)
              6 1
              He feels persecuted because not everyone cares to promote his Christian proselytizing. So this lack of promotion = attack.

              I think the kid has great natural gifts of size, speed and strength as a quarterback and have no reason to dis him. But unless I'm missing something, the defensive players who want to rip his arms out of their sockets are Christians, too!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by CoolSlaw (December 09, 2011 8:05 am ET)
                2 1
                I like football, but I'm not a huge sports fan. I don't read through the sports section each day so I honestly hadn't even heard of this before Fox started talking about it.

                I'm seriously asking who is attacking this guy over his faith?

                Who? When? What did they say? Can anyone produce an example of these attacks?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Old_Benjamin (December 09, 2011 3:51 pm ET)
                  2  
                  I'm seriously asking who is attacking this guy over his faith?

                  This?

                  Or this? (love the 1st picture)

                  I guess mocking could be seen as attacking. But are they mocking him or his religion?
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by ccreadme (December 08, 2011 11:01 am ET)
        9 1
        Fox gathers EVERY "Christian" and claims them as Conservatives....Has anybody ever heard this particular young man talk politics? Perhaps he has, but I have not yet heard him say anything like: "As a devout Christian, I am a Republican and favor the death penalty, all U.S. Wars and the government should tell all women what they can and cannot do with their bodies."

        I have yet to hear him say it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mookworthjwilson (December 08, 2011 4:37 pm ET)
          5 4
          He has done anti-choice commercials, so we know he hates women.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by HowardBrazee (December 09, 2011 9:41 am ET)
             
          There are some Christians who Do What Jesus Would. But they aren't who Fox is interested in. Fox is interested in the people who believe that their way is right and that anybody who is a bit different is wrong. If I am a good child, Santa (or the Koch brothers) will come and everything will be right.

          Scientists can't be trusted because they are so wishy washy, not being absolutely sure of solutions. Atheists can't be trusted because they are subject to change their minds about ethics or anything else. Liberals are obviously wrong because their "solutions" involve changing from the behavior we were taught as children.

          If someone thinks Tebow isn't the best football player ever - it's an attack on all Christians (not those liberals who Do What Jesus Would Do - Big Money Christians like Pat Robertson).
          Report Abuse
    • Author by CrashGordon (December 08, 2011 10:33 am ET)
      12 1
      If there's a war against Tim Tebow, I haven't heard about it. The only criticism I've heard about him is that he can't throw the ball. Considering that this comes from retired NFL quarterbacks, I think it's on target (pun intended!) and lacking any religious implications. If Tebow wants to trumpet his Christianity at every opportunity, that's fine with me and it seems to be fine with everyone who Fox thinks is persecuting poor Tebow. I would suggest that the next time he kneels down on the field in prayer, maybe he could ask the Almighty for a little more accuracy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (December 08, 2011 10:59 am ET)
        6 1
        Indeed, that is the only war against Tebow I have seen too. As in, he can't throw. We knew this anyway. He is a winner, and he's easy to like as a person, because he seems like he is that nice. He wants to show his religion? Good! Do it! I don't care. It's not affecting me. He's not asking me to convert. He's not throwing it in my face. And let's face it, it's not as if religion was absent from professional sports before Tim Tebow. We've had pro athletes thanking God for touchdowns for quite some time, not to mention after game prayers, before game prayers, and so on. And again, I don't care. Doesn't affect me.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (December 08, 2011 10:47 am ET)
      4 1
      How about celebrating the first amendment? Tim Tebow has been celebrating his religion in public, that is an unusual thing to do but he can do it under the first amendment. People comment about it and many other things--also first amendment. Fox news comments about many things, and the most remarkable thing is that they can say what they want without regard to its truth--first amendment. Fox's lying is something that many people find appalling.

      Poor people and everyone else buy stuff. Unless there are restrictions on what they can buy (for example, as there are with food stamps), people should be able to spend money on whatever they want to--legally, of course.

      With their mindset, nothing appears to be newsworthy. What's all the excitement about common, ordinary events? Fox is getting excited about NOTHING.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CAL (December 08, 2011 11:35 am ET)
      9 2
      I don't think we'd have to guess what FOXPAC's stance would be if, say, Tebow was a Muslim or Budhist, and openly displayed his faith on the field. Straight up, FOXPAC is a safe haven for a good portion of the bigotry and zenophobia that still exists in this country.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Egbert Souse (December 08, 2011 11:36 am ET)
      7 1
      Monica Crowley, after ticking off a list of all the appliances poor people own, asked Andrea Tantaros: "What does it tell you about being poor in the United States?"
      Consumerism negates poverty? Hurrah!

      Crowley relies on the Heritage Foundation report, which in turn relies on the 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey by the Department of Energy. (For some reason, the HF did not use the 2009 survey.) Unfortunately, while the survey gives a breakdown of gross number of appliance and kinds of electrical appliances used by household income, it does not give a breakdown by percentages within an income group. But what it does do for, e.g., air conditioners is to give a breakdown by household income and age of the air conditioner owned. Surprise! The age of the air conditioner nearly halves as you go up the income ladder.

      The survey also does not give a breakdown by cost of the appliance (or whether it bought on credit). Ergo, in Crowley's view, if your household has one crappy $69.99, ten year old window unit with an efficiency rating of 6.0, you cannot be poor!! Noper. You can't be. Absolutely not!!

      But Crowley might have a point, at least from a politica1 standpoint. If, say, before the French Revolution the anti-monarchists and democrats had done a survey to see how many French peasants owned (or shared) a donkey, had splinter-free wooden soup bowls in the pantry, used curtains made of the finest burlap, etc., then all of hub-bub about inequality and poverty could have neutralized and the peasantry would still be allowed to eat cake. So there.





      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (December 08, 2011 12:13 pm ET)
        12 1
        Maybe it's just me, but I find it astounding that people who drive $80,000 cars and live in 10,000-square-foot houses are actually whining because some Welfare recipient has an air conditioner.

        I mean... really?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Egbert Souse (December 08, 2011 6:26 pm ET)
          2  
          Why should the poors have air conditioners? That is what open windows are for. That and jumping.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (December 09, 2011 8:20 am ET)
          5 1
          All good points in illustrating the superficial nature of these attacks.

          It's also important to note that most of your lower end apartments will have a refrigerator, oven, and range included. Some even have air conditioners, but the tenant will likely have to pay for electricity to run them. Was this taken into account? Do these people understand that most of these places aren't zoned for open pit fires?

          Whine and be outraged that some poor people have basic modern appliances in what is supposed to be the richest and most powerful nation on Earth. Don't talk about the shrinking middle class, wage stagnation, jobs going overseas, and income disparity.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by cripto9t709 (December 09, 2011 8:56 am ET)
        2 1
        "Residential Energy Consumption Survey"

        I'm assuming they didn't count the poorest of the poor, the homeless.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by all your eyes (December 08, 2011 12:00 pm ET)
      6 1
      IIRC, the extremely devout Kurt Warner has advised Mr. Tebow to tone down the public displays of faith. It comes off as showy and shallow to many Americans, including devout Evangelicals like Warner, who also knows a thing or two about football.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (December 08, 2011 12:04 pm ET)
      6 1
      According to Varney: "The image we have of poor people as starving and living in squalor really is not accurate. Many of them have things, what they lack is the richness of spirit. That's my opinion."

      Gosh Varney, just how do you define a "richnes of spirit"?

      Considering that the poor have been shown to give a larger percentage of their income to charity than the rich do, how would this not show a very large "richness of spirit"?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by joeybagofdonuts (December 09, 2011 8:14 am ET)
           
        Varney's argument is actually counter to the message expressed in the gospels. Jesus never blesses people "rich in spirit," but "poor in spirit." He even goes further to say they'll inherit the afterlife. He also has some really bad things to say about the rich...

        "But woe to you that are rich: for you have received your consolation. Woe to you that are full now: for you will go hungry. Woe to you that laugh now: for ye shall mourn and weep. Woe to you, when people speak well of you: for in the same manner did their fathers do to the false prophets." Luke 6:24-26

        Looks like Jesus (if he was around/actually existed) wouldn't be taking this nonsense about protecting the "job creators."

        This is the Jesus conservatives worship! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK7gI5lMB7M
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (December 08, 2011 12:16 pm ET)
      6 1
      They can blame some of the undue attention on the Anti-Abortion fanatics who saw fit to use Tebow as a poster boy a couple of years ago.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bicycle522 (December 09, 2011 2:35 pm ET)
           
        So because he believes in the right of human life he should be critised? Uhh?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by beDecent (December 08, 2011 12:26 pm ET)
      2  
      While it may take courage to paint Bible verses on your face, I think it takes more courage to come out publicly and say, "I don't believe in God," especially when people like FOX pundits and their viewers vilify atheists as people who are only here to take away your rights. I mean, who are "anti-Christian bigots?" People who don't want Christianity (or any other religion) mixed in with our government, a government for the people?

      I'd recommend reading Starnes' article for a good laugh. He ends with, "At the end of the day, though, which NFL star would you want your little boy idolizing? A dog killer? A guy who beats up his girlfriend? Someone who is communicable? Or a man who loves Jesus, helps orphans and builds hospitals for the needy?" I'm not sure why the loving Jesus part makes Tebow superior to non-believers, particularly professional football players, who help orphans and build hospitals for the needy, or are involved in any other sort of charitable work.

      The Jim Crow comparison:
      "It seems Tebow might help himself and the kingdom by getting off his knees, taking the verses off of his face, and being faithful to Christ without the public acts like all the other Christians in the NFL have done for decades," wrote Anthony Bradley, an associate professor of theology and ethics at The Kings College in New York City, in World Magazine.

      Perhaps the good professor would suggest Christians enter restaurants through the back door and use separate drinking fountains?
      Invoking Civil Rights-era struggles to suggest Christians are dealing with the same type of oppression? What a good Christian Starnes is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (December 08, 2011 12:30 pm ET)
        3  
        The day an avowed atheist is elected President, I'll take all this Christian hand-wringing more seriously.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rmwarnick (December 08, 2011 12:46 pm ET)
      6 1
      Let me get this straight. Apparently Faux News Channel pundits won't be happy until poor Americans resemble starving Somalis?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (December 08, 2011 1:46 pm ET)
        6  
        Actually they are comparing apples to oranges and hoping that people don't notice.

        What they do is take someone in America who has a job, pays rent, struggles to put food on the table, etc but; makes less than the poverty level in wages. They then compare them to someone in Africa who has nothing; no job, no food, no house, etc who feeds themselves on garbage and food provided by relief agencies.

        It isn't that we don't have poor people in America that scrounge through dumpsters to find a meal and then sleeps in the street or under a bridge. They are just ignoring them and going "Look, the poor have TV".
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dlimo (December 08, 2011 1:08 pm ET)
         
      I didn't know that purchasing items at a retail store is "giving" one's money away. Are they claiming that spending money at one of their sponsors is irresponsible?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Evangelical Democrat (December 08, 2011 2:34 pm ET)
         
      "The position of Fox News is clear: Christians are relentlessly persecuted in America and need Fox News to as an advocate."

      A big reason why Christians (and even more people who THINK they are Christians) are, ahem, persecuted is because they believe the lies and hyprocrisy of Fox News.

      This Christian absolutely wants NO PART of Fox News advocating for him. I have a hard enough time undoing the damage of pseudo-Christian Republicans.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JasonA (December 08, 2011 3:09 pm ET)
         
      The Daily Kos did call him a "religious nut" for no reason. And Jake Plummer said he should tone down the faith. So it is not like he isn't being singled out for his religion.

      The War and Christmas? Now that is a joke.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (December 08, 2011 6:48 pm ET)
      4  
      I admit I almost never watch football.

      But I've looked up Tim Tebow, and what sort of "persecution" is he facing from the media, or fans, or "Hollywood" for his religious beliefs? Sounds to me like he's a media darling, despite the fact that MMFA football fans who know the sport better than I do point out a mediocre performance.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kabniel (December 08, 2011 7:57 pm ET)
      3  
      I have talked about and heard many discussions about Tebow on sports channels, my wife is a HUGE football fan, and at work where the NFL is always a big topic. I have NEVER heard any criticism of Tebow that isnt about his usually poor and at BEST pedestrian passing ability. Fox loves to gin up these wars and conflicts that exist only in their minds. It isnt a war on Xmas that everyone doesnt do things the way THEY want. It isnt a war on Tebow that he isnt considered the next coming of Dan Marino or Payton Manning. This faux news channel is dishonest to an extreme that approaches satire.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by case1000 (December 08, 2011 8:09 pm ET)
      1  
      I remember when sports people said Fran Tarkington couldn't make it as a quarter back......Tebow, as long as he doesn't show at my front door to preach his faith, I could care less........
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Unreality (December 08, 2011 8:10 pm ET)
      6  
      My Christian Comment of the Day!

      How many Americans who are without jobs, on unemployment, losing their homes, unable to feed their children, on foodstamps - are Christians? Statistics say that the majority of such Americans are Christians.

      Therefore, the logical retort to FauxNoise - Why does the GOP wage war on Christians who are without jobs, on unemployment, losing their homes, on foodstamps and unable to feed their children?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 09, 2011 11:43 am ET)
      3  
      Tebow is being "attacked" becuase he's overated and he sucks.

      If there's a Religious aspect to this, how about: GOD DOESN'T CARE WHO WINS THE DAMNED FOOTBALL GAME!

      It's a f---ing GAME, and if you think THE ALMIGHTY GOD cares about the outcome, then you aren't religious, you're DELUSIONAL.

      It's like having "In God We Trust" on our money. It offends Atheists, sure, but it should offend CHRISTIANS.

      But the all right REALLY wants is as much Christainity as possible, as often as possible, in as many places as possible, never giving ANY consideration as to whether that expression is approprite from either a social, Constitutional or even CHRISTIAN standpoint.

      ---------------------------------------
      IMHO
      UTOPIA
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jim Nauseam (December 09, 2011 1:58 pm ET)
         
      How can all those homeless people be "poor" when so many of them push around those expensive shopping carts?
      Report Abuse