The Poor Christians And The Happy Poor
December 08, 2011 9:36 am ET by Simon Maloy
"WAR ON TEBOW" declared Fox News' The Five on Tuesday as the panel of four conservatives and Bob Beckel launched into a discussion of Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow and his frequent public declarations of his Christian faith. "What do you think scares the media most?" asked Eric Bolling. "The clean-cut, the conservative, or the Christian aspect of Tim Tebow?" GOP strategist Andrea Tantaros opined that "it's ridiculous to go after Tim Tebow. He can express whatever he wants and it takes a lot of courage to put Bible verses on your face."
The trials of Tebow have been well-covered by the Murdoch network. Yesterday, Fox News' unofficial culture war correspondent Todd Starnes wrote that Tebow "will always be a lightning rod for anti-Christian bigots," and expanded the narrative to declare that "it's become something of a sport to attack Christians in this nation," what with the "reprehensible anti-Christian propaganda" coming from Hollywood and the almost-beyond-parody "War on Christmas." Starnes even went so far as to compare the Tebow situation to Jim Crow.
The position of Fox News is clear: Christians in America are relentlessly persecuted and need Fox News as an advocate. The hitch, of course, is that Christianity remains the overwhelmingly dominant faith not just of the nation at large but also of the people elected to lead it. But the culture war needs to be fought, so insults aimed at a football player, store clerks saying "Happy Holidays," and similarly minor (or imagined) slights are embellished into organized campaigns of anti-Christian persecution.
That in and of itself is disingenuous, but as the network exaggerates the threat to Christianity in America, it simultaneously downplays -- even mocks -- the very real plight facing those whom Christian teachings demand be shown compassion: the poor.
Poverty in the U.S. is on the rise. Incomes are decreasing. According to the Census Bureau, right now there are over 46 million Americans in poverty, more than there have been at any time since they started publishing poverty estimates. Fifteen percent of U.S. households are "food insecure," meaning they lack money to properly feed themselves on a daily basis. They face a host of problems, both quantifiable and not: lack of access to health care, chronic underemployment, disrupted family life, and so on.
But to hear Fox News tell it, the poor don't have it so bad. Earlier this year, the conservative Heritage Foundation released a report on how the ownership of household appliances demonstrates that "most of the persons whom the government defines as 'in poverty' are not poor in any ordinary sense of the term." Seizing on Heritage's laughably superficial assessment of poverty, Bill O'Reilly asked: "How can you be so poor and have all this stuff?"
Fox News' Stuart Varney cast the report as evidence that "poor families in the United States are not what they used to be." After he was skewered by Jon Stewart, Varney responded by saying all he did was tell the "truth about poor people." According to Varney: "The image we have of poor people as starving and living in squalor really is not accurate. Many of them have things, what they lack is the richness of spirit. That's my opinion."
This past July on The Five, Monica Crowley, after ticking off a list of all the appliances poor people own, asked Andrea Tantaros: "What does it tell you about being poor in the United States?" Tantaros replied: "It sounds pretty good to me. I'm trying to make it in Manhattan. I have a microwave and a TV. I guess I'm poor in Obamanation."
When the National Bureau of Economic Research released a study on the extent to which government programs keep millions of Americans from sinking deeper into poverty, Fox Business Network's Charles Payne castigated the poor for not being ashamed of their poverty: "There's no doubt that these are good programs. I think the real narrative here, though, is that people aren't embarrassed by it. People aren't ashamed by it." Payne would later offer this mocking explanation for poverty in America: "After everyone's eaten their Thanksgiving meal, right, go to Wal-Mart at midnight. You're going to see why a lot of people don't have money. They're going to take their welfare checks and bum-rush the security guard, knock him down, and give away all their money."
It's a striking contrast. One day Fox News will defend Christians from the faith-killing scourge of Rhode Island "Holiday Trees," and the next they'll mock those in need for having refrigerators but lacking "spirit." They'll insist on protecting the right to say Christian prayers in public, and attack a poor person for spending all their money at Wal-Mart. It's a clash of faith and politics that does double harm by hyping illusory threats to an empowered majority while obfuscating real problems plaguing the millions of Americans most in need of a little Christian charity.
















His beliefs are his business.
I will say I don't believe he will continue to have success on the field. Defenses will figure out how to stop him. He doesn't have a quick release, isn't accurate, and will (sad to say) inevitably get hurt given the number of times he's carrying the ball per game.
But at this point, his record speaks for itself. The Broncos are winning games, and he is their starting quarterback. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is that.
There is no "war" (the usual Fox metaphor, again, for anything and everything they criticize) on Christianity in general or Tim Tebow in particular. Anything for ratings, I guess, though, literally anything, no matter how bogus.
now- replay all those interview and on field feeds- and then read the above again- can you imagine the foxmelt as their horror crested?
First of all, who has been attacking his Christianity?
Secondly, what position above multi-million dollar earning quarterback for an NFL team was he trying out for and denied because of his faith?
This "culture war" nonsense is where the right seeks refuge when they're losing the mainstream on economics and poor leadership.
I think the kid has great natural gifts of size, speed and strength as a quarterback and have no reason to dis him. But unless I'm missing something, the defensive players who want to rip his arms out of their sockets are Christians, too!
I'm seriously asking who is attacking this guy over his faith?
Who? When? What did they say? Can anyone produce an example of these attacks?
This?
Or this? (love the 1st picture)
I guess mocking could be seen as attacking. But are they mocking him or his religion?
I have yet to hear him say it.
Scientists can't be trusted because they are so wishy washy, not being absolutely sure of solutions. Atheists can't be trusted because they are subject to change their minds about ethics or anything else. Liberals are obviously wrong because their "solutions" involve changing from the behavior we were taught as children.
If someone thinks Tebow isn't the best football player ever - it's an attack on all Christians (not those liberals who Do What Jesus Would Do - Big Money Christians like Pat Robertson).
he could work for fox
Poor people and everyone else buy stuff. Unless there are restrictions on what they can buy (for example, as there are with food stamps), people should be able to spend money on whatever they want to--legally, of course.
With their mindset, nothing appears to be newsworthy. What's all the excitement about common, ordinary events? Fox is getting excited about NOTHING.
Crowley relies on the Heritage Foundation report, which in turn relies on the 2005 Residential Energy Consumption Survey by the Department of Energy. (For some reason, the HF did not use the 2009 survey.) Unfortunately, while the survey gives a breakdown of gross number of appliance and kinds of electrical appliances used by household income, it does not give a breakdown by percentages within an income group. But what it does do for, e.g., air conditioners is to give a breakdown by household income and age of the air conditioner owned. Surprise! The age of the air conditioner nearly halves as you go up the income ladder.
The survey also does not give a breakdown by cost of the appliance (or whether it bought on credit). Ergo, in Crowley's view, if your household has one crappy $69.99, ten year old window unit with an efficiency rating of 6.0, you cannot be poor!! Noper. You can't be. Absolutely not!!
But Crowley might have a point, at least from a politica1 standpoint. If, say, before the French Revolution the anti-monarchists and democrats had done a survey to see how many French peasants owned (or shared) a donkey, had splinter-free wooden soup bowls in the pantry, used curtains made of the finest burlap, etc., then all of hub-bub about inequality and poverty could have neutralized and the peasantry would still be allowed to eat cake. So there.
I mean... really?
It's also important to note that most of your lower end apartments will have a refrigerator, oven, and range included. Some even have air conditioners, but the tenant will likely have to pay for electricity to run them. Was this taken into account? Do these people understand that most of these places aren't zoned for open pit fires?
Whine and be outraged that some poor people have basic modern appliances in what is supposed to be the richest and most powerful nation on Earth. Don't talk about the shrinking middle class, wage stagnation, jobs going overseas, and income disparity.
I'm assuming they didn't count the poorest of the poor, the homeless.
Gosh Varney, just how do you define a "richnes of spirit"?
Considering that the poor have been shown to give a larger percentage of their income to charity than the rich do, how would this not show a very large "richness of spirit"?
"But woe to you that are rich: for you have received your consolation. Woe to you that are full now: for you will go hungry. Woe to you that laugh now: for ye shall mourn and weep. Woe to you, when people speak well of you: for in the same manner did their fathers do to the false prophets." Luke 6:24-26
Looks like Jesus (if he was around/actually existed) wouldn't be taking this nonsense about protecting the "job creators."
This is the Jesus conservatives worship! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK7gI5lMB7M
I'd recommend reading Starnes' article for a good laugh. He ends with, "At the end of the day, though, which NFL star would you want your little boy idolizing? A dog killer? A guy who beats up his girlfriend? Someone who is communicable? Or a man who loves Jesus, helps orphans and builds hospitals for the needy?" I'm not sure why the loving Jesus part makes Tebow superior to non-believers, particularly professional football players, who help orphans and build hospitals for the needy, or are involved in any other sort of charitable work.
The Jim Crow comparison: Invoking Civil Rights-era struggles to suggest Christians are dealing with the same type of oppression? What a good Christian Starnes is.
What they do is take someone in America who has a job, pays rent, struggles to put food on the table, etc but; makes less than the poverty level in wages. They then compare them to someone in Africa who has nothing; no job, no food, no house, etc who feeds themselves on garbage and food provided by relief agencies.
It isn't that we don't have poor people in America that scrounge through dumpsters to find a meal and then sleeps in the street or under a bridge. They are just ignoring them and going "Look, the poor have TV".
A big reason why Christians (and even more people who THINK they are Christians) are, ahem, persecuted is because they believe the lies and hyprocrisy of Fox News.
This Christian absolutely wants NO PART of Fox News advocating for him. I have a hard enough time undoing the damage of pseudo-Christian Republicans.
The War and Christmas? Now that is a joke.
But I've looked up Tim Tebow, and what sort of "persecution" is he facing from the media, or fans, or "Hollywood" for his religious beliefs? Sounds to me like he's a media darling, despite the fact that MMFA football fans who know the sport better than I do point out a mediocre performance.
How many Americans who are without jobs, on unemployment, losing their homes, unable to feed their children, on foodstamps - are Christians? Statistics say that the majority of such Americans are Christians.
Therefore, the logical retort to FauxNoise - Why does the GOP wage war on Christians who are without jobs, on unemployment, losing their homes, on foodstamps and unable to feed their children?"
If there's a Religious aspect to this, how about: GOD DOESN'T CARE WHO WINS THE DAMNED FOOTBALL GAME!
It's a f---ing GAME, and if you think THE ALMIGHTY GOD cares about the outcome, then you aren't religious, you're DELUSIONAL.
It's like having "In God We Trust" on our money. It offends Atheists, sure, but it should offend CHRISTIANS.
But the all right REALLY wants is as much Christainity as possible, as often as possible, in as many places as possible, never giving ANY consideration as to whether that expression is approprite from either a social, Constitutional or even CHRISTIAN standpoint.
---------------------------------------
IMHO
UTOPIA