About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Gaffney: Obama Defense Strategy "Eviscerate[s] The Armed Forces Of The United States," "Invites" Attack

January 10, 2012 10:25 am ET by Media Matters staff

Responding to the Obama administration's announcement of an overhauled defense strategy that will guide cuts in defense spending, Frank Gaffney wrote in a January 10 post on Andrew Breitbart's Big Peace wrote that "[t]his is the first time in memory that a president has voluntarily eviscerated the armed forces of the United States and redeployed what remains so as to create acute vacuums of power in time of war." 

Gaffney further wrote: "If even the defense reductions, downsizing and disengagement that it envisions come to pass -- let alone those in prospect if the cuts associated with the pending sequestration legislation are imposed, the United States will not simply expose its people, allies and vital interests to attack.  It will invite such attack." 

However, as Media Matters has noted, experts have said that the proposed plan is fiscally responsible while keeping America the "world's most dominant military." 

From Gaffney's piece: 

Listening to Barack Obama laying out what he calls his new defense strategy, my first reaction was, "Here we go again." Having basically written off the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mr. Obama is falling prey to a temptation several of his predecessors found irresistible in peacetime: Cut defense expenditures. Shrink the military. And hope the rest of the world will neither notice nor take advantage of our weakness. 

Something is decidedly different, however. This is the first time in memory that a president has voluntarily eviscerated the armed forces of the United States and redeployed what remains so as to create acute vacuums of power in time of war. Unfortunately, I am referring not just to the war in Afghanistan that we continue to be engaged in, for the time being at least. 

[...] 

Under such circumstances Mr. Obama's "revised defense strategy" is a formula for disaster. If even the defense reductions, downsizing and disengagement that it envisions come to pass -- let alone those in prospect if the cuts associated with the pending sequestration legislation are imposed, the United States will not simply expose its people, allies and vital interests to attack. It will invite such attack.

Gaffney has previously fearmongered that repealing the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy could lead to reinstatement of the draft. 

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by bintx (January 10, 2012 10:28 am ET)
      5 2
      Gaffney is a PNAC neo-con who is ALWAYS WRONG. The PNAC believes that being in a state of constant war makes a country strong.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Romario (January 10, 2012 10:36 am ET)
      3  
      The fact is Gaffney said the exact same thing when Clinton enacted defense cuts in 1993 - nevermind that the defense cuts were proposed by Bush Sr. Defense Secretary Dick Cheney and signed into law by Bush Sr. Somehow the meme became "Clinton destroyed the military".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (January 11, 2012 10:27 am ET)
           
        And never mind that developing and announcing a framework for restructuring the military is what any responsible Administration should do in light of expected defense department budget cuts mandated by the "sequestration" agreed to by Republican Congressional leadership during the debt ceiling negotiations. Such a restructuring also acknowledges the anticipated budget cuts trending in the national debate over deficit reductions as well as the reality of America's ongoing withdrawal from overseas warfare.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Imbecile (January 10, 2012 10:41 am ET)
      4  
      How long did Gaffney want the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to go on?

      What kind of person describes ending wars as "writing them off"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JoeBtfsplk (January 10, 2012 10:43 am ET)
        5
      Maybe Obama plans to nuke Iran and doesn't want our troops near.

      Gotta give him credit for thinking.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (January 10, 2012 10:46 am ET)
        5  
        Amazing! How do you type? I mean how can you see the keys with your head so far up your arse?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cst (January 10, 2012 11:57 am ET)
        3  
        [Maybe Obama plans to nuke Iran and doesn't want our troops near.]

        If you approve of this so much, why are you openly planning to shoot him?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (January 11, 2012 10:25 pm ET)
           
        JoeButthead

        Maybe you should STFU. You are a punkass troll. You just post vile ignorance for attention and to push our buttons. You are too stupid to pull it off. You are too pathetic to be annoying. You are just a punk.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (January 10, 2012 11:01 am ET)
      6  
      If budget cuts would eviscerate the military, let's raise taxes to prevent cuts to the military.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 10, 2012 12:50 pm ET)
        7  
        Huh? What's one thing got to do with another ??

        This disconnect the wingnuts have between "government" and "military" is really baffling to me. Just a few days ago I was listening to Lispy Limbaugh sputtering about government not being able to create a job, about stripping all government agencies and entitlements to the bone.

        On the same show, he got a phone call from a young guy claiming to be a soldier, who was worried about his job and benefits. Lispy just shifted gears and started whining that Obama was trying to take away government jobs and benefits.

        And, just a few days ago here, one of our wingnut friends offered his theory that the only reason Dems win any elections is because they pander to the half of the country that's suckling at the government teat. Of course, since he brings up his Navy service often, he was cajoled into admitting that he only had a college education and a house thanks to entitlements. And that he enjoys these entitlements to this day.

        They just can't seem to connect the dots. Their entitlements are deserved, other peoples' are handouts.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 10, 2012 12:59 pm ET)
          3 2
          It's the authoritarian brain . . . they truly cannot see the contradiction.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 10, 2012 1:11 pm ET)
            1 1
            But they sure can give you heckuva thumbs down !! LOL, that's making a statement.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by beDecent (January 10, 2012 12:11 pm ET)
         
      Apparently no war ever ends. Apparently, we need troops all over Europe. Why? Because there was once a war there we were involved in. Never mind how long ago it was and how stable the region is now.

      Their insistence on spending cuts is 100% politically motivated. Starve Americans, but don't even think about pulling all the troops out of Italy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 10, 2012 12:52 pm ET)
        1  
        I laugh every time I hear these right wingers bitching about "eviscerating" our military. It's like they got stuck about 50 years ago, and haven't noticed the slightest change in the world regarding our defense, and who the threats are.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (January 10, 2012 1:13 pm ET)
          1  
          They all forget Rumsfeld's decision to slim down the military before the Iraq War and his statement that you fight wars with the army that you have or whatever the f_ck he was saying back then.

          They also forget that AG Ashcroft requested a cut in anti-terroism funding on September 10, 2001.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 11, 2012 12:25 am ET)
               
            That's not really fair. You can't accuse people who never knew sh*t of forgetting. As much as it seems the wingnuts forget everything as they sleep every night, keep in mind that there's a lot of stuff they just never learned in the first place.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by neon desert (January 10, 2012 12:21 pm ET)
      1  
      ...the United States will not simply expose its people, allies and vital interests to attack. It will invite such attack.
      Might as well have Glenn Beck do the planning for this. I just don't foresee a big turnout. Also, I think that starting any earlier than 8:00 would imply dinner.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by danielsangeo (January 10, 2012 12:38 pm ET)
      1  
      ....Frank Gaffney wrote in a January 10 post on Andrew Breitbart's Big Peace...


      Interestingly, it wasn't written in "Big Government". Perhaps this "eviscerat[ion] of" government the size of government is something they disagree with.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (January 10, 2012 3:38 pm ET)
      1 1
      I was about 100 ft from the stage when SecDef Robert Gates told the Navy Expo that the U.S. Navy had 11 carrier groups, more than the next six countries, combined! He said we needed to make serious cuts, but they needed to be done wisely. TeaCons want to cut the government spending by 50-75%, but the vsst majority want no cuts to Medicare or Social Security, and none of them want cuts to the military. If we don't cut Medicare or Social Security, where do we cut? I once asked a Major who spouted the 50% cut crap whether he wanted to quit his job or take a 50% pay cut, he looked dumbstruck, then said he'd prefer the pay cut, but he didn't want to discuss the issue further. His blindness isn't uncommon. It's easy to spout stuff, but it's hard to really talk about solutions. There is a lot of waste and redundancy in the Defense budget, and it is one of the biggest items in the Government's budget, behind interest payments and entitlement spending. We need to have serious discussions about spending and funding. What do we want as a country, and how are we willing to pay for it?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 11, 2012 11:51 am ET)
         
      Who are we at war with? Which country?

      We could cut our defense spending IN HALF and still be outspending Russia, China, Great Britain and France COMBINED.

      This is LOOOOONG overdue. And Ron Paul seems to be the only Republican who KNOWS this! (Too bad he's a kook!)

      ---------------------------------------
      IMHO
      UTOPIA
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.