Gaffney: Obama Defense Strategy "Eviscerate[s] The Armed Forces Of The United States," "Invites" Attack
January 10, 2012 10:25 am ET by Media Matters staff
Responding to the Obama administration's announcement of an overhauled defense strategy that will guide cuts in defense spending, Frank Gaffney wrote in a January 10 post on Andrew Breitbart's Big Peace wrote that "[t]his is the first time in memory that a president has voluntarily eviscerated the armed forces of the United States and redeployed what remains so as to create acute vacuums of power in time of war."
Gaffney further wrote: "If even the defense reductions, downsizing and disengagement that it envisions come to pass -- let alone those in prospect if the cuts associated with the pending sequestration legislation are imposed, the United States will not simply expose its people, allies and vital interests to attack. It will invite such attack."
However, as Media Matters has noted, experts have said that the proposed plan is fiscally responsible while keeping America the "world's most dominant military."
From Gaffney's piece:
Listening to Barack Obama laying out what he calls his new defense strategy, my first reaction was, "Here we go again." Having basically written off the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mr. Obama is falling prey to a temptation several of his predecessors found irresistible in peacetime: Cut defense expenditures. Shrink the military. And hope the rest of the world will neither notice nor take advantage of our weakness.
Something is decidedly different, however. This is the first time in memory that a president has voluntarily eviscerated the armed forces of the United States and redeployed what remains so as to create acute vacuums of power in time of war. Unfortunately, I am referring not just to the war in Afghanistan that we continue to be engaged in, for the time being at least.
[...]
Under such circumstances Mr. Obama's "revised defense strategy" is a formula for disaster. If even the defense reductions, downsizing and disengagement that it envisions come to pass -- let alone those in prospect if the cuts associated with the pending sequestration legislation are imposed, the United States will not simply expose its people, allies and vital interests to attack. It will invite such attack.
Gaffney has previously fearmongered that repealing the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy could lead to reinstatement of the draft.

















What kind of person describes ending wars as "writing them off"?
Gotta give him credit for thinking.
If you approve of this so much, why are you openly planning to shoot him?
Maybe you should STFU. You are a punkass troll. You just post vile ignorance for attention and to push our buttons. You are too stupid to pull it off. You are too pathetic to be annoying. You are just a punk.
This disconnect the wingnuts have between "government" and "military" is really baffling to me. Just a few days ago I was listening to Lispy Limbaugh sputtering about government not being able to create a job, about stripping all government agencies and entitlements to the bone.
On the same show, he got a phone call from a young guy claiming to be a soldier, who was worried about his job and benefits. Lispy just shifted gears and started whining that Obama was trying to take away government jobs and benefits.
And, just a few days ago here, one of our wingnut friends offered his theory that the only reason Dems win any elections is because they pander to the half of the country that's suckling at the government teat. Of course, since he brings up his Navy service often, he was cajoled into admitting that he only had a college education and a house thanks to entitlements. And that he enjoys these entitlements to this day.
They just can't seem to connect the dots. Their entitlements are deserved, other peoples' are handouts.
Their insistence on spending cuts is 100% politically motivated. Starve Americans, but don't even think about pulling all the troops out of Italy.
They also forget that AG Ashcroft requested a cut in anti-terroism funding on September 10, 2001.
Interestingly, it wasn't written in "Big Government". Perhaps this "eviscerat[ion] of" government the size of government is something they disagree with.
We could cut our defense spending IN HALF and still be outspending Russia, China, Great Britain and France COMBINED.
This is LOOOOONG overdue. And Ron Paul seems to be the only Republican who KNOWS this! (Too bad he's a kook!)
---------------------------------------
IMHO
UTOPIA