About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

What's Good For General Motors Is Awful for Rush Limbaugh

January 26, 2012 2:22 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

If you missed this Rush Limbaugh clip from yesterday, it's rather astounding when you put it into the larger cultural context and truly appreciate how far right-wing media have ventured out into no-man's land with their ongoing war against Detroit automakers. It's astounding because we're talking about conservative, flag-waving, America-first commentators who in the last few years have declared war on American autoworkers, of all people. 

To the point where they cheered Detroit's demise, railed against any attempt by the Obama administration to save the industry via a bailout, and now, as Limbaugh did this week, simply refuse to acknowledge the extraordinary turnaround the American companies are enjoying.

Why? Simple: If Obama is for the car companies succeeding, the right-wing media have to be against them. Aggressively. (Although, it's funny that when GM ad dollars were flowing Limbaugh's way he sang a very different tune.)

The latest case of Limbaugh auto-bashing was prompted by the news that just two years after teetering on bankruptcy, bailed-out General Motors is now the world's largest car maker, selling 9 million vehicles last year.

Great news, right? Wrong.

Last week, Media Matters noted that in the wake of Detroit's extraordinary turn-around, partisan bailout bashers like Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin and Fox News haven't spent much time cheering the sales surge. Proof? Confronted with encouraging manufacturing news about GM, an iconic American company thriving with a payroll of American workers, Limbaugh refused to acknowledge the success.

Instead, he lashed out at the carmaker, and refused to believe that GM's robust sales numbers were accurate. In fact, he denounced them as an "absolute crock." Because GM and Detroit autoworkers are the enemy of conservative media.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2012 2:29 pm ET)
      12  
      Well, it makes sense. Blimpy is the shameless sock puppet of Corporate Plutocrats, and those guys hate unions.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (January 26, 2012 3:14 pm ET)
        4  
        And workers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by politeradical (January 26, 2012 5:35 pm ET)
        5  
        They're all America first until someone joins a labor union.

        Then that person is worse than Hitler, to quote that idiot on The Five (zeros).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (January 26, 2012 2:35 pm ET)
      12  
      Unlike the financial industry, the auto industry has enormous upstream and downstream supply chains, making its success all the more beneficial to the economy.

      Heads are exploding in the ranks of the Campaign For Obama's Failure.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2012 3:14 pm ET)
        11  
        And, unlike the financial industry, they actually create something.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (January 26, 2012 3:25 pm ET)
          5  
          And they actually have some sense of pride in what they create.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 26, 2012 5:20 pm ET)
          6  
          You might appreciate this, Nerz. I came home and flipped on the tube, decided to check out Hardball for a bit. Chris Matthews had on one of those "republican Strategists" a sort of nerdy black guy , Ron Christie?.

          Following some comments about regulation, Matthews tells the guy " I always thought you were sort of a moderate Republican. What's you position on climate change?"

          And the guy tells him it's a huge hoax by Al Gore and his cronies to make money. Matthews face was priceless, just a "WTF?" look, he apparently didn't know how wingnut the guy is.

          Then Matthews asks, facetiously, what's your take on evolution ?

          And the guy says the Lord God is our creator, we evolved from him. Then I about lost it, when Matthews asks another guest " What is it with the troglodytes?"

          I've never heard anybody in the mainstream media use "troglodytes". Good for Tweety.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2012 6:00 pm ET)
            6  
            Matthews lapsed a bit during the Bush Administration, but I think he's finally backed away from the dark side. He's leveled some scathing criticism at the Republicans lately. I haven't heard him call them Troglodytes before... he makes me proud.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Chameo (January 26, 2012 6:02 pm ET)
            5  
            Chris gets into rare form as the various races heat up. He's been more and more combative lately, which is an interesting contrast when he goes from talking about the "brilliant strategy" someone is using to talking about how insane they are. I have to keep reminding myself that he views the mechanics of a campaign as completely separate from the merits of the candidate or I'd blow a gasket at least twice a week.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by m.welker (January 26, 2012 2:41 pm ET)
      3  
      R. Limbaugh's words to live by:
      "I ignore your reality, and choose to supplant my own imagined world instead."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Liberal in the South (January 26, 2012 3:02 pm ET)
      5 2
      sales numbers are an absolute crock? So instead of reporting 10-K's to the public and the SEC, GM should report them to you first to check? And no a 10-K is not how much you make per lie.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by curiousindependent (January 27, 2012 5:29 pm ET)
           
        10-K is not how much you make per lie
        Nope. Not even close. 100-k would come closer, but would still be a fair distance from truth.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfvl (January 26, 2012 3:14 pm ET)
        13
      obama forced bondholders to accept a lower buyout than they would have received legally in a bankruptcy.

      GM's chief executive, Fritz Henderson, earlier this month said the U.S. Treasury had set a maximum of 10 percent equity for bondholders in any restructuring.

      Privately, GM's biggest bondholders and attorneys have resorted to black humor, referring to the automaker as "Government Motors" or "General Mess."

      One bondholder, who declined to be identified, said the committee balked at the GM offer after hearing details that the United Auto Workers union would get an 39 percent equity stake -- nearly four times the offer for GM bondholders -- in exchange for the union's much smaller $10 billion claim.

      "If we have to go to bankruptcy, we have to go the bankruptcy and maybe we'll get a better deal," one bondholder source said on Friday.

      Plans for restructuring competitor Chrysler, which filed for bankruptcy last month, and General Motors, would leave investors with far lower payouts than they expected based on their legal rights and priority of claims, analysts said.


      The bailout allowed GM to restructure without bankruptcy and it's requirement to open contracts, etc. Instead, they just transferred the capital of the bondholders, yours and my 401k's and grannies pension, to increase the union's stake in the company beyond what their investment legally deserved.

      I'm glad that GM is ok, but it cost the public a great deal more than money for retirement. Volts, those coal powered vehicles have to be sold with more subsidy money rather than GM being able to sell cars that Americans want without using taxpayer monies.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brian Griffith (January 26, 2012 3:36 pm ET)
        9  
        If GM was truly not making cars that Americans want, they wouldn't be doing this well. Volts are a red herring, albeit a popular one.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2012 3:41 pm ET)
          11  
          The electric car is a viable idea. They just have to get the price down and build the infrastructure to support them. It will happen, eventually, unless the Troglodytes figure out a way to kill it.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 26, 2012 3:38 pm ET)
        12  
        No responsible 401k manager would invest heavily in one stock, so your handwringing about Granny's pension is a wee bit overstated.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by chazmanr (January 26, 2012 5:23 pm ET)
          4  
          What's a 401k manager? Most people select their 401k investments themselves from a range of mutual funds, bond funds, annuities, money market funds, etc. Therefore, put the blame where it belongs...on mumbles for not diversifying.

          Now, pension fund managers are a different issue. If you are in a pension plan, you are at the whim of your pension fund manager. But I agree that no responsible pension fund manager would invest heavily in one stock. However, tell that to the former employees of Enron.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by curiousindependent (January 27, 2012 5:32 pm ET)
               
            Well, you DID stipulate "responsible pension fund manager".
            Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (January 26, 2012 3:39 pm ET)
        12  
        "The bailout allowed GM to restructure without bankruptcy and it's requirement to open contracts, etc."
        WRONG.

        GM did file for bankruptcy.

        You can freely spew all your Obama-is-evil talking points all you want, but you should at least get your pertinent facts straight.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 26, 2012 5:08 pm ET)
          2  
          muffie never understands the things she links to here. They just about never support what she's trying to say.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by curiousindependent (January 27, 2012 5:32 pm ET)
             
          ...get your pertinent facts straight.
          Why start now?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by montanabuddha (January 26, 2012 3:42 pm ET)
        11  
        That's pretty old news there mmflv.

        Bondholders in a crashing company whining about the deal they were getting. I'll bet they are singing a different tune today.
        General Motors has the Highest Earnings Yield in the Automobile Manufacturers Industry
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 26, 2012 5:12 pm ET)
          7  
          muffie's always good for a laugh. Linking to a 2 1/2 year old article with quotes from the bondholders jockeying for their deal as her up-to-the-minute comment on the auto bailout.

          The fail is strong in muffie..
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dazednamused (January 26, 2012 6:59 pm ET)
            5  
            Muffie ... I like that ... and I can't help but think of Danny DeVito in Ruthless People:

            "Muffie, meet Adolph ... Adolph, eat Muffie"
            Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (January 26, 2012 5:09 pm ET)
        4  
        Yeah, we should all drive Hummers because no taxpayer money ever went into those...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by chazmanr (January 26, 2012 5:15 pm ET)
        4  
        yours and my 401k's and grannies pension, to increase the union's stake in the company beyond what their investment legally deserved


        Mumbles, if you haven't diversified your retirement investments, that is hardly GM's, the President's or Congress' fault.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kabniel (January 26, 2012 7:34 pm ET)
        2  
        MMMoron

        You are such a brainwashed and disgusting piece of dirt. The ONLY thing you care about is attacking union contracts. You WANTED bankrupcy for that very reason. Every businessman knows that keeping a healthy company is preferable to bankrupcy. The bondholders are probably pretty happy they DIDNT go into bankrupcy NOW that GM sold more cars than any car company in the world last year. You are pathetic and stupid MMMoron and you always will be
        Report Abuse
      • Author by curiousindependent (January 27, 2012 5:35 pm ET)
           
        Yeah, as I recall, those bondholders were refusing to allow any such thing, preferring to allow the company to go belly-up.

        Why?

        Because they had "insurance" on their "investments" that would have paid them FAR more than the stocks were worth at that time, as long as the "investment" went bad.

        These poor poor individuals and funds were willing to allow MILLIONS of people dependent upon the automotive industry for their jobs to become jobless so that they could make a few bucks more.

        Cry me a river.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hoopvillain (January 26, 2012 3:21 pm ET)
      7  
      How do you spell Rush?, L-I-A-R
      Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (January 26, 2012 4:14 pm ET)
      2  
      And we all know rush knows a crock when he sees one.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by politeradical (January 26, 2012 5:26 pm ET)
      2  
      Sounds just like a person I know who screams about the evils of "government motors" and how he will NEVER again purchase one of their vehicles.

      He also cries about illegal immigrants destroying this country while making money off them, rails about seat belt laws, taxes, regulations and safety nets of all kinds.

      Anarcho-capitalist libertarians are hilarious.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.