About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Wash. Times' Kuhner: "Mr. Obama Is An Anti-Christian, Anti-Religious Bigot"

February 12, 2012 12:33 pm ET by Media Matters staff

In his February 10 Washington Times column, titled "End of the Constitution: Obamacare birth-control mandate would defeat the First Amendment," Jeffrey Kuhner called President Obama "an anti-Christian, anti-religious bigot" whose "goal is to purge Christianity from civil society, to marginalize religion from the public square." Kuhner's attack is in response to the president's announcement that he would require most employers to cover contraceptives for women. President Obama later announced an accommodation in which insurance companies would directly offer contraception coverage to employers who have religious objection to such coverage.

From the Times:

Is America sliding toward autocratic rule? This is the essential question of Barack Obama's presidency. Mr. Obama vowed to "fundamentally transform" the United States. Despite his incompetence and economic failure, the president is making good on his central promise: the destruction of our constitutional republic. He is trying - piece by painful piece - to reverse the legacy of the Founding Fathers.

[...]

His greatest assault, however, is on religious freedom. Fortunately, his latest effort sparked a rebellion. Mr. Obama had declared war not just on the Catholic Church, but on the First Amendment. The administration ordered almost all religious organizations to provide health insurance coverage that includes free birth control and sterilization procedures - even the morning-after pill, which can induce abortions. Otherwise, under Obamacare, Catholic hospitals, charities and universities would face major fines totaling millions of dollars. The choice was clear: Catholic institutions must either abandon their fundamental tenets or go bankrupt. The contraceptive mandate denied the conscience rights of the church. It was state-sanctioned coercion of private entities to act against their explicit religious beliefs. This is why it triggered such furor among Catholics and non-Catholics alike. If such basic liberties could be trampled on, then nothing - and no one - is safe from big government's crushing grip. Fortunately, a three-week outcry forced him to back off.

Like many on the radical left, Mr. Obama is an anti-Christian, anti-religious bigot. His goal is to purge Christianity from civil society, to marginalize religion from the public square. He essentially told the church that Washington, not the Vatican, will dictate how it must run its affairs and administer its social services. He demanded that Catholics sacrifice their beliefs on the altar of secular liberalism. The state - with him at its helm - is the new pagan church. Women's "reproductive health care" trumps Catholic positions on birth control and abortion. The fact that most health insurers already cover contraception and that it is widely available and accessible to women - just go to your local Walgreens - means nothing to feminists or the powerful abortion lobby. The real aim is to smash the Catholic Church as a bulwark against the sexual revolution, reducing it to a quisling of the liberal regime.

Catholic leaders rightly stood up. The Church understood it was under siege. That may not be over. Mr. Obama could win a second term. Hence, Obamacare - along with its contraceptive mandate - might not be repealed and may even expand. If so, he will have succeeded in giving birth to his Frankenstein monster: a post-constitutional, post-American soft tyranny.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by politeradical (February 12, 2012 12:41 pm ET)
      16 3
      A wingnut whack job talking about an amendment other than the second?

      Apocalyptic hyperbole by the metric ton. Oh the poor oppressed Christian right.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by johnsta (February 12, 2012 10:58 pm ET)
        8 3
        If Catholics are as good and following their teaching as well as their church leaders THINK they are... there should be NOT ONE person in their cult signing up for ANY of this that is allowed to all people.

        WHAT are they so scared of? Realizing that hardly anyone in their cult is actually following their archaic teachings?

        Must be!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (February 12, 2012 12:43 pm ET)
      27 5
      Oh, shut up. Obama's a better Christian than you are. For that matter, he's a better Christian than most Republicans. Try reading the Gospels, you'll be surprised; Jesus never once supported the death penalty, trickle down economics, or denigrated the poor. Jesus spoke about social justice, advocated prayer in private, not in public, and didn't engage in hate speech, which is your stock in trade. Before you lecture other people about being a Christian you should learn what Christianity actually means.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by grmce (February 12, 2012 8:47 pm ET)
        7 2
        I've often found that some of the best "Christians" in practice are people who don't profess to be Christians whereas many of the worst are amongst the loudest in touting their "Christian cred" - a bit like the Pharisees.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (February 13, 2012 10:26 am ET)
          1 1
          Or, kind of like the people most loudly proclaiming they're not a homosexual generally are.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (February 13, 2012 8:17 am ET)
        5 1
        Every Atheist I have ever met is a better Christian than most self described 'Christians'. They tend not to follow their own instruction manual.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (February 13, 2012 10:28 am ET)
          2  
          What is kind of funny about this is that I am an atheist, and I have had exchanges with people when they ask me about my religious beliefs and I tell them that I am an atheist, they look shocked.

          Why?

          Their first question is; so you don't believe in anything?

          Umm, no. I don't believe in sky gods raining down judgment and things like that. I don't believe in supernatural forces who can affect our lives. They seem to have a disconnect that they think you can't be a good person, without being a Christian. I once told them I was a Muslim just to see what would happen, now THAT was funny.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by notsure5 (February 14, 2012 11:57 am ET)
               
            One way you can twist them in knots is in respect to morals. They may wonder how someone can have morals without religion, but you can ask why they need an outside source for their morals. Personally I think that if someone needs an omniscient being to keep them from doing bad things, that is lower morals than someone who can avoid doing bad things without one.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (February 12, 2012 12:45 pm ET)
      10  
      Says the methadone addict who writes for the Moonie rag.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 12, 2012 12:47 pm ET)
      16  
      Obama's "goal is to purge Christianity from civil society"...?

      Hyperbole much...?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by politeradical (February 12, 2012 12:58 pm ET)
        13  
        He's got to keep his relief-pitcher job with Michale Weiner locked up.

        Fortunately, a three-week outcry forced him to back off.

        From where I stand, Obama played you idiots like a fiddle. GOP candidates worked themselves into a wedge issue furor while Obama finished the details on a settlement that will help stabilize the housing market. An issue Americans actually care about. Meanwhile conservatives offer NOTHING on the economy, jobs or home foreclosures.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (February 12, 2012 1:09 pm ET)
        20 1
        I wouldn't even use the word "hyperbole". That implies an exaggeration of some truth that's actually there. Kuhner's working with something made from scratch.

        It's the same people who are all panicky at some individuals observing Sharia law, seeing it as being imposed on them or the country, who flip 180 degrees when it comes to having their religious beliefs imposed on others.

        Right wingers always get the constitution backwards. They may be happy as long as it's their religion that's the dominating majority, but they might not like it so much if that ever changes. The establishment clause is there to protect religion as much as government, and this loophole in healthcare could set a precedent that might come back to bite them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (February 12, 2012 6:15 pm ET)
          13 1
          Indeed, the republicans have been making up a created Obama since long before took office. They can't really go against what he has done, or wants to do, because then they would have to actually pretend to know that they know what he has done.

          It is easier for them to make up a bad socialist caricature to go after because then they have their boogeyman.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by grmce (February 12, 2012 8:50 pm ET)
        5  
        Hyperbole much...?
        In the wake of the Super Bowl we have the Hyper Bowl.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dwendt44 (February 12, 2012 1:03 pm ET)
      6  
      Mr. Kuhner is an idiot.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (February 12, 2012 1:12 pm ET)
      5  
      But he sat in Jeremiah Wright's church!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by j238 (February 12, 2012 1:39 pm ET)
      16 2
      Religion doesn't belong in public policy discussions.

      President Obama has not introduced religion into this, so the right wingers have manufactured this controversy.

      Hey Kuhner, since you brought up this nonsense, have you ever relied on birth control?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rhun1220 (February 12, 2012 1:49 pm ET)
      11  
      I have a question--perhaps someone here knows. Does the pharmacy in a Catholic run hospital offer contraceptives. My guess is yes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (February 12, 2012 3:03 pm ET)
        14  
        And, catholic doctors prescribe birth control pills all the time since birth control pills are useful for things other than contraception:

        Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
        Endometriosis
        Lack of periods ("amenorrhea")
        Menstrual Cramps
        Premenstrual Syndrome
        Heavy Menstrual Periods
        Acne

        Nope, nothing to see here, just keep moving folks.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MickD (February 12, 2012 3:54 pm ET)
          6  
          My good Catholic mother, who had four pregnancies in less than 4 years, jumped on the pill bandwagon around 1964. She wrestled with the decision, thinking it to be a "sin." My ma's doc, bless him, simply said, "if you're sinning, then..." he proceeded to give the names of several of her like minded Catholic friends. She felt better, and her last two kids (five total) were planned.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (February 12, 2012 5:53 pm ET)
            3 1
            What? Your mom's doctor gave your mom names of her friends who were on the pill? Seriously?

            I'm 100 percent in favor of women having total access to family planning services. But I sure hope you just made that story up- because if your mother's doctor shared that information, he should have been severely reprimanded by the AMA.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grmce (February 12, 2012 8:57 pm ET)
              7  
              Not if the friends had given him permission to use their names in reference.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (February 13, 2012 10:29 am ET)
              4  
              And, I'd say, it was the mid 60's, things were a bit, umm, different then.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (February 13, 2012 2:46 pm ET)
              1  
              But I sure hope you just made that story up- because if your mother's doctor shared that information, he should have been severely reprimanded by the AMA.


              Probably not in 1964, as the story stated. Further, it is not a requirement for physicians to be members of the AMA any more than it is a requirement for an attorney to be a member of the ABA.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (February 13, 2012 10:12 pm ET)
                1 2
                The doctrine of doctor-patient confidentially applies regardless of whether the doctor belongs to the AMA. I'm frankly appalled at the suggestion that any doctor would name patients using the pill- or anything else about their patients.

                I assume MickD's mom had no problem with this doctor adding HER name to the list, for the next patient to hear?
                Report Abuse
    • Author by puttforever4682 (February 12, 2012 2:07 pm ET)
      14 1
      What I found interesting was that Santorum was complaining the cost of Contraception was easily managed by all women. At the same time Liz Cheney says that the poor insurance company would have to eat all that gigantic cost.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (February 12, 2012 3:28 pm ET)
        13  
        And that "gigantic cost"? Cuts their costs enormously as does nearly all preventive care.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (February 12, 2012 6:16 pm ET)
        6  
        For poorer folks, indeed, around 600-700 per year for the pill is kind of expensive.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MthOlyoak (February 13, 2012 9:30 pm ET)
           
        Simply put, it is manageable for me to take care of myself but it is costly for me to take care of the 40 percent who do not pay taxes. It is called personal responsibility as opposed to entitlement. Sorry, I do not feel responsible to pay for your birth control nor your abortions . Start being responsible for yourself. It is called growing up.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thewhatnow? (February 12, 2012 2:13 pm ET)
      8  
      I followed the link and read the "column" and some of the comments on Washington Times. I need a hug.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (February 12, 2012 4:26 pm ET)
      7  
      The "fair and balanced" portion of the mainstream media will condemn Kuhner for calling Obama "Mister."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phlcstgan (February 12, 2012 4:48 pm ET)
      6  
      A guy like Kuhner is fighting a losing battle because his writing gets more and more hysterical with every column; it's unsustainable. Eventually he's going to have to just start writing "NYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGGGGH" the entire length of the column, after which his column will just be replaced by pictures of aborted fetuses.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phlcstgan (February 12, 2012 5:26 pm ET)
      5  
      Also, God help Kuhner if it ever turns out starting sentences with "Mr. Obama is a" causes cancer, because that's all his hack ass is capable of writing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (February 12, 2012 6:12 pm ET)
      5  
      Of course, there is zero proof of this being true, but hey, it won't stop this moron from saying it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (February 12, 2012 11:31 pm ET)
        4  
        Just another authoritarian who has easily appointed himself as the arbiter of what being christian means.

        His support for any other religion, except for lip service for an armagedon site in the middle east, can be accurately measured in pico ergs.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (February 13, 2012 6:33 am ET)
         
      I do wish Kuhner got into the practice of referring to the President as "President Obama" or "President Bush" instead of dropping the "Mr." on us. Sounds so corrosive towards the position.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (February 13, 2012 10:30 am ET)
           
        Lots of times, when people write about the POTUS, they tend to name the title the first time in an article, and then call said president "Mr." after that. It's pretty typical actually.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (February 13, 2012 11:57 am ET)
      4 2
      Sorry, but I read the comments section of the Whitney Houston article before Fox got around to purging all of the RACIST, anti-Christian comments posted there by Fox viewers.

      Please note all of the "comment removed" notations. I have NEVER seen so much racist, un-Christian, hate-filled filth in my life. Shows EXACTLY the type of person who watches Fox.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 13, 2012 11:59 am ET)
        4 1
        Actually, it looks like the comments being removed are the ones who call out the racists. Scroll down until you find axmax83's lovely comment.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 13, 2012 12:51 pm ET)
        5 2
        Thanks for confirming that you are a racist idiot, thumbsdowner. Anyone who agrees with the horrible people who posted the racist, hate-filled bilge on that Fox story is just as racist and hate-filled as they are.

        Thanks for exposing yourself for what you are. Must suck to be you. :)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (February 13, 2012 1:36 pm ET)
          3  
          I did bintx and although you didn't paste it I will.








          axmax8323 hours ago




          SHe couldn't even sell issues of "the national enquirer" anymore. Everyone was tired of the TNB. Niqqer flaps her lips and screeches, n-word(i added to get through censors the author said the n-word) becomes rich. N-word ends up nearly broke after spending all of her money. N-word in constant fights and drug binges. N-word ODs when she learns she's nearly broke and she is so wasted physically she can't make another album. N-word hit the end of the road, n-word thinking and n-word behavior led her to where she had nothing. She couldn't face life without the "bling bling", she knew she would never have any more "kaching kaching"


          Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/02/11/whitney-houston-dies-at-48/#comment#ixzz1mHvgPmYO
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (February 13, 2012 1:38 pm ET)
            2  
            or maybe not. Here is the orignal without my editing.







            axmax8323 hours ago




            SHe couldn't even sell issues of "the national enquirer" anymore. Everyone was tired of the TNB. Niqqer flaps her lips and screeches, niqqer becomes rich. Niqqer ends up nearly broke after spending all of her money. Niqqer in constant fights and drug binges. Niqqer ODs when she learns she's nearly broke and she is so wasted physically she can't make another album. Niqqer hit the end of the road, niqqer thinking and niqqer behavior led her to where she had nothing. She couldn't face life without the "bling bling", she knew she would never have any more "kaching kaching"


            Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/02/11/whitney-houston-dies-at-48/#comment#ixzz1mHvgPmYO
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (February 13, 2012 1:56 pm ET)
              3  
              I'm so sorry . . . I am appalled at these idiots and even more appalled at Fox for leaving the racist comments up and taking down the comments which confronted the racists. There were people accusing the folks who were pointing out the BLATANT racism of being "race-baiters." Obviously, these racist clods don't know the meaning of the term.

              Just nauseating.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (February 13, 2012 2:06 pm ET)
                2  
                I am sorry too that these kind of animals exist and that popular sites think they have a place in our society!
                Report Abuse
    • Author by bogeybit (February 13, 2012 8:47 pm ET)
         
      Nowhere in the Constitution is there a "right" to contraception, people. A woman can always say "no" or pay for it herself. Even though insurance paid contraception might be a nice idea, one cannot ignore or change the Constitution, except through the amendments system to provide it. The freedom of religion overrides womens "perceived" right to free contraception. And sorry, johnsta, Catholicism is not a cult. Why do you liberals always name call? Can't you argue without your hate?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sandman67 (February 14, 2012 2:23 am ET)
      1  
      As I pont out in a blog post called "J'Accuse!" whch you can read at http://alstefanelli.wordpress.com/ :-

      "And what about the US Catholic Church’s apparent new best friends the GOP? Well, as I have pointed out in my critiques of Messrs Santorum and Gingrich, which you can read on this site, the political positions maintained by the GOP seem strangely at odds, diametrically opposed one might say, to established Roman Catholic Church doctrine. Still, if you can turn a blind eye to pedophilia what’s a little doctrinal difference or two between friends?

      On the matters of fair wealth distribution across society; social welfare safety nets; healthcare policy; market regulation; workers rights and unions; climate change science; the use of torture; the use of imprisonment and detention without charge; capital punishment; immigration policy; and, war and conflict the Roman Catholic Church holds diametrically opposed views to the GOP. In fact the only common positions that the two share are a loathing for and fight against LGBT equalities, and fighting any form of abortion and contraception access for women."

      And to confirm what atheists have posted here....my takedowns of Messrs Santorum and Gingritch prove that by the standards, doctrines and polcies off the Roman Catholic Church I, an atheist, am not only a more moral person Im a better Catholic than either of them.

      In Santorums case he is also arguably a schismatic heretic.
      Report Abuse