About us Login Get email updates
Eric Boehlert
Print

ABC's Nightline walks away from Iraq

November 27, 2007 12:27 pm ET

Last Friday marked something of a milestone for ABC's widely acclaimed news program Nightline when it aired a detailed look at life inside the chaotic emergency room at the 28th Combat Support Hospital in Baghdad. The significance? It was the first time since July 18 that Nightline had broadcast a firsthand news report from Iraq examining the on-the-ground effects of the still-unfolding war there.

In the four-plus months in between, Nightline produced more than 230 separate news segments covering a kaleidoscope of topics, but just one was filmed in Iraq: a Green Zone-based profile of Gen. David Petraeus on the eve of his Capitol Hill testimony. As for the daily or weekly events of the war itself, for 18 straight weeks (or one-third of the calendar year), Nightline effectively walked away from Iraq. What took its place? Lots of Nightline reports on pets and pop music.

It didn't always used to be that way.

During the run-up to the war, Nightline host Ted Koppel was embedded with the Army's 3rd Infantry Division for a little over a month, reporting first from Kuwait, and then moving with the Army across the border into Iraq, before finally entering Baghdad, where he chronicled the fall of the city.

And the program's commitment remained long after the invasion. In January 2004, Koppel returned to Iraq with a Nightline crew of 14 and produced a week-long series about the war, which kicked off with an hour-long Nightline special. That spring, Koppel and Nightline made headlines when he committed to reading the names of the 721 U.S. soldiers who, at that point, had died in the war. The Sinclair Broadcasting Group, owners of several ABC affiliate stations, refused to air the program, calling Koppel's tribute a political act.

In 2005, Nightline was awarded an Emmy for the program's nearly two-year-long series profiling the Marines of Fox 2/5 Company.

In November 2005, when Koppel left ABC News, Nightline was reconfigured. The program moved from Washington, D.C., and began broadcasting live from New York every weeknight. (Koppel had preferred pre-taping his segments). Hosting duties were split among Cynthia McFadden, Terry Moran, and Martin Bashir. The program no longer covered just a single topic each night and it mostly did away with the program's signature in-studio interviews. Instead, on most nights, Nightline now races from story to story to story within its 30-minute timeframe, usually tackling three topics each night.

At first, Nightline tried to carry on the show's commitment to covering Iraq. In fact, during the first week of the new format, Moran broadcast from Baghdad for consecutive nights. But over time, it became clear that Nightline's interest in covering the war had waned. The program certainly was not alone. Most television news outlets, and the networks, in particular, have drastically cut back on the amount of airtime they now give to the war. Sometimes it appears as though the war doesn't even exist.

For instance, on October 21, Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney appeared on CBS' Face the Nation for an extended interview. Host Bob Schieffer asked Romney 18 questions about his candidacy, his beliefs, and his political agenda. Not one was about the war in Iraq.

What's so distressing is that television's wholesale withdrawal from covering the war comes at a time when Americans, week after week and month after month, tell pollsters that the "situation in Iraq" is the story they follow most closely, according to the Pew Research Center's weekly News Interest Index. According to Pew, for the week of September 16-21, nearly a third of the public (32 percent) followed news about the situation in Iraq very closely." That figure was virtually unchanged in Pew's most recent survey, for the week of November 11-16.

Yet what percentage of their total news coverage do television outlets devote to the situation in Iraq? Less than 5 percent. That disconnect between what news consumers are clamoring for (i.e. substance from Iraq) and what news professionals are providing (i.e. everything but) is astonishing.

What's obvious is that it's becoming increasingly difficult to find news about the war on television. If the U.S. military action inside Afghanistan is often referred to as "The Forgotten War," due to the lack of media attention it receives, what has Iraq become -- "The Forgotten War II"?

And perhaps nowhere is that amnesia stronger than at ABC's Nightline. The virtual news boycott from Iraq that Nightline has implemented since July went far beyond what any other major American broadcast has done. Again, Nightline aired more than 230 news reports between July 18 and November 22, and not one was about the events on the ground in Iraq. Nightline has not even bothered to cover the ongoing Blackwater USA scandal, involving private American contractors accused of opening fire on unarmed Iraqi civilians on September 16 at a crowded Baghdad intersection, killing 17. The mass shootings are now being investigated stateside by a federal grand jury. Yet, in the 10 weeks since the story first made headlines, there has not been one word about Blackwater USA mentioned on Nightline. Not one.

It's true that Nightline has recently covered some aspects of the Iraq story. As I mentioned, the program covered Petraeus' testimony before Congress in September, although the report was more of a profile of Petraeus and the debate surrounding the policy of the war, as compared to the events of the war itself. Nightline has also reported on how soldiers in Kansas are preparing for their tours of duty in Iraq, as well as the spike in the number of Army deserters.

But up until Friday night, what Nightline had not done for four months was broadcast a single report from Iraq that viewed the war from the perspective of those fighting it or those simply trying to survive it. And what Nightline still has not done for more than four months is broadcast a report that revolves around that day's events from Iraq. For instance, on the night after mammoth suicide bomb blasts in Iraq on August 14 killed more than 500 people, making it one of the deadliest acts of terrorism ever recorded, Nightline aired reports about a Mexican stem-cell doctor, lullaby singer Lori McKenna, and soccer star David Beckham. That same week, the program aired two separate reports about the earthquake in Peru that killed approximately 500 civilians. But nothing about the suicide blasts in Iraq that also killed more than 500 civilians.

That the news blackout occurred at Nightline, where news consumers used to go for insightful reporting on foreign affairs, and in particular about Iraq, is particularly distressing. Nightline, after all, was born out of an earlier foreign policy crisis; the 1979 hostage calamity in Iran. The nightly news update that Koppel hosted, "The Iran Crisis: America Held Hostage," proved so popular that it gave birth to Nightline, which quickly earned a reputation for in-depth investigative journalism, as well as extended interviews. In 2002, the George Foster Peabody Awards for Broadcast Excellence recognized Nightline with a Lifetime Achievement Award, reflecting the widespread admiration Nightline enjoys within the broadcast news industry.

Some Nightline alumni, though, no longer recognize the program. Dave Marash, a former correspondent, recently noted, "Today's Nightline, on many of its broadcasts, no longer looks unique, ambitious, detailed or devoted to news which is really important."

Nightline's Pole Dancing as Exercise

What has Nightline been covering during the last four months instead of the war in Iraq? Here's a look at some of the fluffier segments the program has aired in place of reports from Iraq (The slugs, or names of the reports, come right from the Nightline archives.):

  • Twin Skateboarding Stars
  • "Frenemies"
  • Couchsurfing.com
  • Pole Dancing as Exercise
  • Rock & Roll Camp for Girls
  • Death of the Postcard
  • Barbie vs. Bratz
  • Great Lobster Hunt
  • Burger King's Gamble on Marketing
  • Butlers In High Demand
  • Frozen Yogurt Wars
  • Discrimination Against Redheads
  • Expensive Parking Spaces
  • PerezHilton.com
  • Pasta Wars
  • [Barry] Bonds' Navy
  • Babies at the Box Office
  • Paddington Bear a Sellout?
  • A Football Fan Makes Wine the New Beer
  • Deeper Vocals Attract Women
  • Larry Wilmore is "Seriously Funny"
  • Celebrity Reality
  • Colbert for President?
  • The Jane Austen Renaissance
  • The Real Estate Blogger
  • Dental Spas
  • The Gentle Side of Sharks
  • Ghost Hunters
  • The Diva Treatment

Along with the stable of soft features, Nightline's been displaying a Casey Kasem-like indulgence in pop music. A new regular segment on the program features well-known performers discussing their favorite records. In recent months, Nightline has sat down with Kid Rock, Michael Bublé, James Blunt, Tony Bennett, Alison Krauss, Pete Wentz, The Edge, The Fray, Seal, Angélique Kidjo, Trisha Yearwood, and Laura Bell and asked them about their favorites.

Separately, Nightline has aired stand-alone features on artists Lori McKenna, Annie Lennox, Ringo Starr, Paul McCartney, Kanye West, and the passing of opera great Luciano Pavarotti.

And then there's ubiquitous American Idol host Ryan Seacrest -- who Nightline recently devoted almost an entire evening to profiling. Here's a sample as Moran, the former ABC News White House correspondent, parried diligently with the elusive interview subject for a morsel of news:

MORAN: You don't mind if I say, "Ryan, are you gay"?

SEACREST: No, I'm not. Don't mind.

MORAN: Didn't bother you?

SEACREST: Didn't bother me. I'm straight. Doesn't bother me.

Also noteworthy has been Nightline's recent obsession with pet stories. As described by program synopses at abcnews.go.com:

  • Pampering Pets with Organic Food: "Lobster, crab, shrimp, and filet -- items that appear on the best Zagat rated menus. So, which restaurant are we talking about? We're not. We're bringing you the latest on organic pet food. Following the scare of animals falling ill from contaminated Chinese pet food, some pet owners are going to extremes to protect the health of their beloved pooch."
  • Dog Lovers in Japan: "In Japan, dogs are all the rage. Canines are increasingly the companions of choice in this island nation. Companies are banking on the trend, making doggy acupuncture, couture and even funeral services available to pet owners."
  • Fat Pets: "It's hard to resist a wagging tail or a pleading glance. But excessively doting on your pet by overfeeding it has led to an epidemic of obese animals. Pet owners are killing their pets with kindness, says one veterinarian who is on a crusade to slim down our furry friends."
  • No Expense Spared on Pets: "New York City's Animal Medical Center treats dogs, cats, parrots and mice -- from chemotherapy to psychotherapy, some owners spare no expense on their Pets' medical care. Jeffrey S. Klausner, the CEO and president of the nonprofit facility, says 'we are the Mayo Clinic for pets.' "

In highlighting the stories above, I'm not suggesting Nightline no longer does any serious journalism. It does, as evidenced by recent reports on breast cancer, presidential politics, autism, school shootings, the mortgage meltdown, childhood obesity, and the spread of neo-Nazism. Also, on November 12, Nightline aired an extraordinary firsthand look at the fighting that still rages in the mountains of Afghanistan.

An ABC News spokeswoman tells me there has been no conscious decision at Nightline to look away from the war, and that it's "not fair" to suggest the program has turned its back on the Iraq story. She also points out that Nightline has undertaken several multi-night series, such as its recent look at patients facing life-threatening illnesses, and that in turn limits the number of topics the program can tackle at any given time.

That's a fair point. But it's also fair to note that Nightline's new, post-Koppel format allows it to address far more topics on a weekly basis. Meaning, the program usually reports on 10-15 topics each week. Yet even with those additional opportunities the program is reporting far less about Iraq than when Nightline addressed just one topic each night when Koppel was the host.

Marking his exit from Nightline, as well as ABC News, in November 2005, Koppel, a former State Department correspondent, bemoaned the lack of foreign news on network television:

At a time that we really have to worry about what's going on in the rest of the world, what people in other countries think of us, we are less well informed by television news than we have been in many years."

When it comes to the war in Iraq, Nightline viewers have certainly become less well-informed.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (November 27, 2007 12:42 pm ET)
         

      The surge was a brilliant "success"...right? Nothing more to see here. The Bushies are ready to declare "victory" and settle into permanent occupation. If the media report too much of what's really going on in Iraq, it might conflict with their new paradigm.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (November 27, 2007 1:07 pm ET)
           

        ..That Bush II either announces or completes a notable troop withdrawal from Iraq 1-3 months prior to the general election.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 27, 2007 1:41 pm ET)
           

        That's 'enduring' occupation, utilizing 14 'enduring' bases.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (November 27, 2007 2:06 pm ET)
             

          Operation Enduring Occupation, has a nice ring to it. After the new "treaty" is signed, we will be there forever. GWB wants to make sure of it.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (November 28, 2007 8:08 am ET)
           

        The startling history of Nightline certainly is a case study, in and of itself, to the obvious disgrace that corporate media has become......

        When was ABC bought by Disney? I wonder what its history of storytelling and news hounding looks like since that first day? Or NBC and CBS?

        We know where it is now and I'm willing to bet that it has been a steady stream of more useless and more sloppy work?

        Is this why Ted Koppel left? Perhaps he saw the corporate disease for what it is and looked at FOX Noise for a quick second and realized the direction the media was heading and wanted out before he was damaged?

        The thing that pisses me off about all this is that todays 'news' media almost completely ignores the illegal occupation of Iraq and virtually ignores the war in Afghanistan and yet many of its puny superstars like O'Reilly and Beck!

        When they do mention the 'war' it is only to benefit them by claiming that those of us talk about whats happening over there or we demand to know they claim we are somehow hurting the troops or being un-American?

        Yet they rarely, if ever, talk about the details of why we are really there or what is really happening because we are there......

        These new corporate media clowns and their paymasters of today are literally their own sick joke!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Uncle Walt (November 27, 2007 12:53 pm ET)
         

      The first comment was exactly what I was going to say. The new conventional "wisdom" is that the surge has "worked", thus making it all somehow worthwhile. This is the same dynamic that occurred after the Iraqis voted and showed off some purple fingers. Chris Mathews immediately declared that Bush had been right all along, and for a few months the war was okay with the corporate media again. Now after three years of chaos, large parts of the country are ethnically cleansed, and the militias are rearming, so the body count is temporarily down. See, Bush was right all along.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by National_Insecurity (November 28, 2007 8:45 pm ET)
           

        Is the US Military surge really responsible for the decrease in violence, or is it also due to many non-military factors few people mention?

        Muqtada al-Sadr declared a 6 month ceasefire in August. Sadr's Mahdi Army of radical Shiites surely weren't stopped by US military forces.

        Baathists are now being permitted back into government positions high and low. Weren't these the same people leading the Sunni militias?

        Sunni Sheiks and their tribes are being given large amounts of US money, weapons and roles to patrol their neighborhoods a militias. Now that they have money to employ people, there's less need to plant IEDs for income.

        Sixty percent of foreign fighters, read al Qaeda in Iraq, are from Saudi Arabia and Libya. So if Saudi Arabia reduces support for al Qaeda, does that reduce violence? (here's a story that was buried on Thanksgiving eve in the NY Times)

        The Brits pull out of Basra and violence declines by 90%. Obviously a result of the US surge?

        In short, Petraeus's counter-insurgency program is predicated upon more effort on political and community action than on military might. Yes, they go hand-in-hand, but for years US strategy was military only, and look where it got us.

        For McCain or Bush to extol the military surge as solely responsible for the decline in violence is Iraq is like the center on a football team taking credit for the win. He may touch the ball on every play, but it takes a bigger team to win.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 27, 2007 2:50 pm ET)
         

      Does anyone watch that show? If so, they are getting the news they crave. Reminds me of the GLOBE rag mag headline, which Nightline may use.. "Scientists Prove Dinosaurs Honked Like Buicks". Used this before on MMFA.

      Truthy, could you check your facts on the Buick thing.

      Uncle Walt, let's hope that this lull is for real..then our troops can come home. Maybe they can help the troops in Afgan...find Bin Laden.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 27, 2007 3:01 pm ET)
           

        He said he never heard such a ridiculous statement.

        In his world dinosaurs honked like Studebakers.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (November 27, 2007 6:30 pm ET)
         

      All I've been asked to do is go shopping and take my shoes off at the airport.

      "Deeper Vocals Attract Women" - sure as upset I missed that report.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (November 27, 2007 10:16 pm ET)
         

      During the 1979-1980 election season, Nightline was called "America Held Hostage." Anyone else remember that?

      The whole focus of the show was to remind people--constantly-- that we were under siege from terrorists, and that Carter was a bad president for keeping our hostages in Iran. It was unrelentingly propagandistic against Democrats.

      My, how things have changed.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (November 27, 2007 10:26 pm ET)
         

      "Nightline, after all, was born out of an earlier foreign policy crisis; the 1979 hostage calamity in Iran. The nightly news update that Koppel hosted, "The Iran Crisis: America Held Hostage," proved so popular that it gave birth to Nightline, which quickly earned a reputation for in-depth investigative journalism, as well as extended interviews."

      Not so fast. The earlier show was tremendously biased and frantic, with a clear animus against Carter. It was clearly designed to inflame people, and the title was actually only "America Held Hostage," which was hardly an objective, newsworthy kind of name.

      Boehlert-- not sure how old he is-- is giving ABC too much credit here. The show was AWFUL and incendiary-- that was the idea of it. It was clearly designed to make people panicky and hate Iranians, to boot.

      Interesting, too-- no such program appeared during the Reagan years during their problems, which also included some hostage situations....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dfish (November 28, 2007 12:49 am ET)
         

      I watched Ted Koppel every night, it was a hard hitting news program. There was nothing quite like it. After Mr. Koppel left I was deeply saddened by what it became, just another "light news magazine". It's not hard to figure out why some Americans know more about celebrities than their governmet and the world beond it's boarders.

      Do we really need to know what songs are on P-Diddy's Ipod? That's NOT news!

      D Fisher

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lorelei (November 28, 2007 11:14 am ET)
         

      Nightline has not even bothered to cover the ongoing Blackwater USA scandal, involving private American contractors accused of opening fire on unarmed Iraqi civilians on September 16 at a crowded Baghdad intersection, killing 17. The mass shootings are now being investigated stateside by a federal grand jury. Yet, in the 10 weeks since the story first made headlines, there has not been one word about Blackwater USA mentioned on Nightline. Not one.

      The new generation coming up will know nothing of true news, I am afraid.

      Paris Hilton, and the likes will be their only fare.

      In our old age we should all be scared.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 28, 2007 12:54 pm ET)
           

        This is where the GOP's talk radio monopoly pays off. By its very nature, radio is going to reach more people more often than newspapers, television, or even the the web. Radio is unique in that it can be listened to while driving or working.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lorelei (November 28, 2007 11:16 am ET)
         

      MMFA how about updating your "antiquated" posting software....sheesh.......

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 28, 2007 1:25 pm ET)
         

      How reliable are the stats now coming out of Iraq? We've already seen how they skewed the death counts prior to the Petreus report. Just by changing the method of reporting, they were able to show a "decrease" in violence. Are they even reporting the deaths of people killed by our newfound "allies"? Just curious.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by YellowDogDemocrat (November 28, 2007 3:27 pm ET)
           

        My husband is IN Iraq on his second tour. He has been there since last December, and in his view the violence is worse than earlier in the year and worse than during the tour he completed in 2005.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by teiresiastheseer (November 28, 2007 3:09 pm ET)
         

      Lets be clear. Television, all of our hopes and gripes to the contrary, is NOT a journalistic or entertainment medium. The electronic media in general and television in particular exist solely to provide viewers for commercials. It is painful, but it is the truth. As long as people are desperate or stupid enough to continue watching the drivel that innundates the airwaves they are an audience for people selling mouthwash, denture paste, soda, cars and the other detritus of our consumerist society.

      So what is the answer? If you don't like the programming, turn the damn thing off! When ratings get bad enough that advertisers walk away from the programs, the producers will be forced to change the content in order to draw back the audience for the commercials.

      The fact that the programs are as bad as we see and yet continue to draw viewers is a sad commentary on the low level of expectation by Americans.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by elaine_reeves19757138 (November 28, 2007 4:27 pm ET)
         

      Is this show still on? I don't believe it has any significance anymore. Don't sweat over this show, kinda of like Katie Couric, the old standard 3 news programs. Do people get their information from these sources anymore. Awful long article......use your time more wisely!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by National_Insecurity (November 28, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
           

        The loss of supposedly "hard news" outlets leads to further dumbing down of coverage. If a story doesn't get airtime, producers won't request crews and reporters to cover events. We'll get more pre-digested Faux News.

        I can appreciate that Friday nights are only soft news, although Bill Moyers seems to have shown that some people know how to use their Tivos.

        Watch "Max Headroom", an ABC series fro 87-88 to see the future of television. Depressing.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by chuck9 (November 28, 2007 8:58 pm ET)
         

      Which network now does the worst job covering foreign news?

      Report Abuse