About us Login Get email updates
Eric Boehlert
Print

Saradise Lost: How Alaska bloggers dethroned Sarah Palin

July 14, 2009 8:08 am ET

It turns out that blogger Phil Munger hears all his big, breaking Sarah Palin news in the kitchen of his house, which overlooks Neklason Lake and sits just 10 miles from the center of Wasilla, the Southcentral Alaska town where Palin once served as mayor.

On July 3, Munger, a music professor and former '60s anti-war activist who started his blog Alaska Progressive in November 2007, was in his kitchen and got gobsmacked by the announcement that Palin was handing over the reins of the state to her No. 2, and doing it for the good of Alaskans.

Munger's immediate reaction to the stunning news? He emailed me a succinct response: "WTF??!!!"

For Munger, it was déjà vu all over again. Back on August 29, 2008, Munger, again in his kitchen, heard the jaw-dropping news that Palin had been picked as John McCain's running mate. "She's just totally unqualified," was the blogger's first thought.

Stunned, confused, and more than a bit concerned about an America with Palin in the No. 2 position, Munger immediately blogged it. He wanted to warn people about the newcomer to the national stage, the one he first met in the early '90s, when she was a 26-year-old serving on the Wasilla Planning Commission; the one who once told him she believed Jesus Christ would be born again in her lifetime. And when Munger sat down to write his first impressions about Palin's meteoric rise, he opted for an Alaska slang term that described the idyllic frontier realm as depicted by Palin's most fervent Republican supporters: "Saradise."

Munger's blog post was headlined "Saradise Lost," and in the ensuing days, weeks, and months, he kept adding updates, or chapters, as the fall campaign unfolded, and then as Palin returned to govern Alaska. That was last August. Over the recent July Fourth holiday weekend, Munger completed Book Two of his "Saradise Lost" installment. In total, he'd posted more than 250 Palin chapters.

Now the governor was quitting. While she never said it out loud, it certainly wouldn't have been a shock if she'd directed a Nixonian parting phrase toward Alaska bloggers: "You're not going to have Palin to kick around anymore."

I'm not suggesting that homegrown bloggers alone were responsible for Palin's "no más" moment, but there's no question that the online activists played a key role. That with their shit-kicking brand of frontier citizen journalism, they drove Palin to distraction and changed the way voters nationwide thought about the governor. So if conservative bloggers get credit for driving Dan Rather out of the anchor chair in 2004 following their Memogate campaign-season tale, then the band of scrappy liberal bloggers in Alaska ought to be allowed to bask in a bit of glory, because they made their own history when Palin announced her exit.

And the truth is, bloggers didn't back off after last November's election. Their dead-on pursuit of the facts continued right through Palin's awkward farewell bid. As Howard Kurtz noted on CNN's Reliable Sources on Sunday:

It took some liberal bloggers to poke some holes in some things that Sarah Palin said. For example, she had said that most of the ethics complaints against her in the state of Alaska were filed by Democrats. That's not true. She said millions of dollars were spent on legal fees defending her, and she felt badly about that. But actually, the figure was less, and these were mostly staff salaries paid to state lawyers who would have been paid anyway.

Indeed, read this utterly thorough dissection of Palin's tall tale about the cost of ethics complaints for a lesson in what Alaska bloggers have been doing to the governor for the past 10 months. Like a bartender at Wasilla's Mug-Shot Saloon, Palin keeps setting up the tall tales, and local bloggers keep knocking them down. Again and again and again. (Earlier this year, they helped torpedo Palin's pick for Alaska attorney general; the nominee was the first in state history not to be confirmed.)

Brandishing dogged reporting skills and wonderfully insightful, entertaining writing, Alaska bloggers turned the 49th state (and a very, very red one, at that) into a hotbed for plugged-in citizen journalism and showed the rest of the liberal blogosphere, as well as media elites, what's possible when passion and creativity are harnessed online.

Just ask Palin.

And the phenomenon can all be traced back to that morning in late August when word first broke about Palin's ascension to the national stage. That morning, liberal bloggers at sites like Alaska Progressive, Mudflats, Celtic Diva's Blue Oasis, Just a Girl From Homer, Kodiak Konfidential, Own The Sidewalk, What Do I Know?, Alaska Real, AndrewHalcro.com, and Immoral Minority began tapping away at their keyboards, wearing the same stunned expression that Munger had stuck to his face. They didn't realize it right then, but within just a matter of days, Alaska bloggers would emerge as one of the most important local newsgathering sources of the entire election season. (Their hit counts also zoomed into the stratosphere.) And collectively, they wrote a new chapter in campaign journalism.

I was so struck by their contributions last year that I profiled them in my recent book, Bloggers on the Bus: How the Internet Changed Politics and the Press. Their groundbreaking work since the election simply confirms their place in Internet history.

In the right place (i.e. far, far away from the Beltway) at the right time and boasting unmatched knowledge about Palin, the bloggers served an invaluable function last year. While major media organizations scrambled to even get reporters to Alaska to start their background reporting on the governor, the bloggers were teeing up all kinds of meaty morsels hour after hour on that weekend the Palin news broke. (If McCain had tapped former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney to be his VP, I just don't think Boston-based bloggers, for instance, would have had the kind of impact on the VP story that Alaska bloggers did.)

Media companies had few bureaus and even fewer political contacts on the ground in Alaska. And the state's major newspaper, the Anchorage Daily News, just couldn't cover the sprawling Palin story with the kind of obsessive detail that bloggers could; the daily couldn't satisfy the tidal wave of Lower 48 interest in Palin, so bloggers jumped in and started pumping out information and impressions about their governor.

The Bridge to Nowhere, Troopergate (which bloggers Andrew Halcro and Linda Kellen Biegel helped break during the summer of 2008), Wasilla's Palin-era policy on making rape victims and their insurance companies pay for test kits, Palin's unorthodox religious beliefs, her previous love affair with federal earmarks, her anti-science beliefs, and her dubious claim of being "commander in chief" of the Alaska National Guard. It was like a smorgasbord. And quite simply, for long stretches of time, the Alaska bloggers owned the Palin story, as they did their best to paint an accurate picture of the new VP candidate for the rest of the world, a picture that didn't always mesh with the mavericky picture presented by the press.

What happened during the campaign was that organically, Alaska bloggers formed their own "all-Palin, all-the-time" reporting collective -- their own de facto reporting pool -- that often rivaled traditional outlets in terms of output, and one that regularly surpassed the mainstream media for local knowledge and insight.

Did they sometimes play a bruising brand of hardball? You betcha. (What else would you expect in the Last Frontier?) But were they mostly fair and accurate in their Palin coverage? From what I've seen, absolutely. Remember, last year, it was Alaska bloggers who tried to put the brakes on the far-fetched blogosphere campaign, launched outside of Alaska, that raised doubts about whether Palin was really the mother of her new son, Trig, or if Palin's daughter was actually the mother.

Palin and the Alaska bloggers have become, in a way, inseparable. You can't really talk about the roller-coaster ride that Palin's been on over the past 10 months without talking about the local bloggers who have been responsible for so many of the political dips she's suffered since August 29.

A completely unique (and contentious) relationship formed between the bloggers and Palin, and looking at the liaison from afar, I'm not sure which side was more obsessed with the other. Certainly the bloggers, collectively, have shone a homegrown, 24/7 spotlight on Palin that I doubt any other local politician has ever been subjected to. With their relentless pursuit of the facts and their rooting out of whatever Palin prevarications stood in the way of the truth, Alaskan bloggers, as well as their energized army of readers, have been relentless in fact-checking the governor, calling out her abuses of power, and holding her to the standard of transparency that she herself promised as a statewide candidate in 2006.

So, yes, Alaska bloggers have been obsessed with Palin. (They've become Palin-tologists?) What's been so unusual is that that fascination has been reflected right back at them by Palin, who seems utterly fixated on the bloggers and driven to distraction by her inability to control them. Not yet sporting the kind of alligator-thick skin that's pretty much required to run for national office, Palin has shown a real propensity to latch onto the online critiques of her and lash out at the bloggers.

As Time noted last week, "A more experienced, more familiar politician would have been ready for the ramping, but Palin seemed consumed by it. Instead of ignoring hostile bloggers, she combed the Web for their latest postings." And Wonkette recently captured the obsession with the snarky headline "Sarah Palin Will Soon Condemn, Bomb Entire Internet."

It was fitting, then, that the day after making her resignation announcement, Palin had her attorney issue a strange, over-the-top, four-page letter threatening legal action against any news organizations that picked up on the Palin resignation speculation that had been aired by influential Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore.

Appearing on MSNBC in the wake of Palin's stunning announcement, as observers tried to make some sense of it, Moore, searching for a possible explanation, pointed out that there had been a "scandal rumor" floating around Alaska for months about a possible corruption investigation centered on Palin. Moore clearly did not validate the claim of the rumor. She simply pointed out that it existed. Palin's legal eagle, though, then claimed Moore had stated the corruption charge as "fact."

By singling her out for public denunciation, all Palin did was turn the Alaska blogger into a media celebrity and guarantee that she'd be given a larger media platform to discuss the rumor. As the wildly popular Anchorage-based site Mudflats noted with glee:

Shannyn Moore, the aforementioned blogger has now, courtesy of the Palin numbskullery, appeared on The Thom Hartmann Show, The Ed Schultz Show, The Ron Reagan Show, Alan Colmes, Countdown with Keith Olbermann. She's also been written up on the Huffington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Politico, Crooks and Liars, Brad Blog, Think Progress, Daily Kos, and dozens of others. The Associated Press has picked up the story, and so has KTUU and the Anchorage Daily News. Way to squash that rumor. [emphasis in original]

In other words, Alaska bloggers have been blessed with a perfect foil: a politician who overreacts to criticism and who often lashes out in hopes of exacting personal revenge, a politician who can't walk away from a fight, but who often doesn't have the facts on her side when she enters the online fray.

Saradise lost, indeed.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by epkklk851 (July 14, 2009 9:57 am ET)
      16  
      I was completely stunned by Governor Palin's announcement, but I am not sorry to see her go. I had no knowledge of her when her name was announced last summer. I happened to be home, so I sat down and watched the press conference that introduced her to America. I wasn't going to vote for McCain, I already knew that, but I was curious about who he would pick. At first, I was impressed, she was pretty and well dressed and she engaged the camera, but she really lost me with the Pit Bull/Lipstick remark and it just went downhill from there. I saw in her someone who was not informed about world issues, but with a direct appeal to those who shared her limited and distorted view. The religious issues and the association with the seperatist group were just further turn-offs. She is overly ambitious and doesn't seem to realize that her ambition outstrips her abilities. I am grateful to the bloggers who made her political record available. I don't think that telling the truth or reporting the truth is picking on someone, however, I can see how someone who is used to getting their way and having people like them, would view it as being picked on. Sarah is too focused on the small stuff and doesn't grasp the big stuff. She spent way too much time making snarky remarks about Levi, Letterman, and her ethics problems than someone who is ready for the big time. Maybe she will be able to get her act together and take it to the national stage, or maybe quitting will ruin her career and her credibility and we will be the better for it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 14, 2009 11:17 am ET)
        8  
        I tend to agree; her reach definitely exceeded her grasp. When I saw her repeating the "Bridge to Nowhere" talking point, even after it had been thoroughly debunked, I realized that she was either bag-of-hammers stupid, or blatantly dishonest... possibly both.

        I see that she has "written" an editorial for the Washington Post. Maybe the bloggers can find out which Republican hack is acting as her ghost writer.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (July 14, 2009 11:53 am ET)
          4  
          Yes, it would be interesting, because it would help to reveal that hands that are handling her at this point. I am not so sure that she has given up on the political game. I think she didn't like how play was going in this particular court, so she picked up her ball and went home, but she's still looking to play in a friendly game.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 14, 2009 2:11 pm ET)
          6  
          An editorial? I didn't know that you could make an editorial into a pop-up...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 15, 2009 11:30 am ET)
          2 1
          I see that she has "written" an editorial for the Washington Post. Maybe the bloggers can find out which Republican hack is acting as her ghost writer.
          I read it. It has no substance, so she could have written it, but it also has decent sentence structure, and even contains a couple of facts, so she couldn't have written it. They're incorrect facts, but Palin doesn't even know those, let alone their veracity.

          So, I'd also like to know which hack at which Oil Company wrote the lies for her to put under her byline.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ginamarie (July 15, 2009 8:12 am ET)
           
        Well said. A post that is well thought out and communicated without the vitriol, rancour, or malice. Refreshing.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne1 (July 14, 2009 11:54 am ET)
      11  
      I love citizen journalists. With the media culture we have now, they're especially important. It seems that local news isn't really covered in much detail these days with national ownership of local outlets and the concentration of owndership in the hands of the few. So this is exciting.

      The real Mavericks were/are obviously the grassroots boots on the ground that can suss out the chicanery and dishonesty that is glossed over, or given life by mainstream media outlets for either political gain or sensationalism to sell stories.

      No wonder our pols want the internet to be policed the way they'd like. I hope those attempts fail and that the internet continues as an important tool in disseminating vital information.

      Good article, Boehlert. Well done.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pags2 (July 14, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
        5  
        This should serve as an example for all politicians. There are bloggers all over the country ready to pounce on lies and BS. Palin thought she could BS the country with her lies and misrepresentations. When she saw that the bloggers were calling her on her statements, she did not have the common sense to recalibrate her statements. She attacked and showed she was a petty and petulant person.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by historygeek001 (July 15, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
             
          Pags2:

          I HOPE that it serves as an example for both politicans and journalists, but I'm torn between optimism and cynicism. The MSM often doesn't seem to do its job and mindlessly repeats talking points as if they had equal validity with actual facts. At the same time, Palin's mythology is dissolving, so maybe there's hope. I'll cross my fingers, but I don't think I'll make any bets for more accuracy.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pags2 (July 15, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
               
            The MSM walks a fine line because they don't want to attack people like Palin because they will be excluded from any interviews, etc. I would agree that MSM should do more to uncover the BS in politics. I think the MSM is reluctant to attack some of the right wing radicals because they don't want to give the radicals a cause to denounce the MSM. In fact, the right wing radicals will always claim the MSM is liberal. The MSM should go after the radicals as well as Fox. If the MSM did that, the radicals and Fox would have less time to devote attacking Obama and the Democrats because the right wing would have to respond to attacks from the MSM. The MSM needs to take off the kid gloves and stop trying to be nice. The prime example is Palin going after Couric because of what happened in the interview. Palin blamed Couric for what happened when Palin tripped up.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by lewislaw7153 (July 14, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
      2  
      O/T, but am I the only one in the world that does NOT believe that Sarah Palin wrote that 'cap and trade' op ed in the Washington Post?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (July 14, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
        4  
        You're not. As I said in another post, it would be interesting to know, since it might reveal who is mentoring her career now, and where the money will come from.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mattcable250650 (July 14, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
          3  
          Gee, I thought it was hers just because of all the things it did not include. I thought "Okay, this was clearly written by someone who has no concept of things like 'Peak Oil.' "
          Report Abuse
          • Author by epkklk851 (July 14, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
            4  
            For some conservatives, I think Peak Oil is another myth, like climate change. I thougth it couldn't be her because it was too well written. In any case, I think it is an attempt to stay on the stage and gather credibility.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 14, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
        5  
        I don't buy it for a minute. In my opinion, she just doesn't have the depth to write something like that without a lot of help.

        She will probably stay very involved in national GOP politics over the next few years, because they know she mesmerizes the knuckledraggers in their base. Even if she doesn't run for office herself, they will use her to draw people out to fundraising events.

        I could be wrong, but I really don't think she'd survive the Presidential Primary process. Her fellow Republicans would eviscerate her once relieved of the party admonition to be civil. Can you imagine her in a debate with Newt Gingrich?

        Politically, she's very delicate and thin-skinned. She can only thrive in a strictly controlled environment.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (July 14, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
          3  
          Awh! Talk about a deer in the headlights! Caribou Barbie meets the lizard from Georgia. It might be funny though, she could get off some really good snarky remarks at his expense. It would ruin both of them, but it would be fun to watch (could be wishful thinking on my part.)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by historygeek001 (July 15, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
               
            Caribou vs. Lizard--DEFINITELY entertaining to watch. I'd love seeing it, but I doubt that the Republican Powers That Be would let it happen; it would hurt them both.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by ginamarie (July 15, 2009 8:24 am ET)
          1  
          You are absolutely right. There were complete sentences, sequential thought process, and coherent message -- all above Sarah's grasp of effective communication. And knowing what a phony she is, I have no doubt that she would let someone else do the writing and pen her name to it. And still, a flawed and mediocre piece of work.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (July 14, 2009 7:48 pm ET)
        1  
        For anyone interested in the truth about Gov. Palin's much-touted natural gas pipeline, I highly recommend:

        http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2009/03/17/Governor-Palins-Big-Energy-Battles

        Personally, I think the Alaskan legislature finally figured out they got took! You betcha!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by newzhound (July 14, 2009 7:49 pm ET)
        1  
        For anyone interested in the truth about Gov. Palin's much-touted natural gas pipeline, I highly recommend:

        http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2009/03/17/Governor-Palins-Big-Energy-Battles

        Personally, I think the Alaskan legislature finally figured out they got took! You betcha!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by trisha (July 14, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
      3  
      Thankfully, Alaskan bloggers are still on the case.

      Here are just of the few questions:

      Why did she quit? Who is really pulling the strings here? Is Palin just a puppet for the GOP? Who wrote that OpEd piece for Sarah? Why hasn't the State release emails and phone records that were requested 8-10 months ago? Note: contrast that to the recent story of Sanford's email/phone records that were requested and already received by The State newspaper.

      If I were an investigative journalists, I would be on this story like ants on candy. But, at least the bloggers are-- on it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by benjr (July 14, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
        2  
        I agree. While the bloggers have done a great job, there are still too many unanswered questions. Since the MSM won't tackle these issues, I guess the Alaskan bloggers have to keep digging.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (July 15, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
           
        Why hasn't the State release emails and phone records that were requested 8-10 months ago? Note: contrast that to the recent story of Sanford's email/phone records that were requested and already received by The State newspaper.

        Good question. Having worked as an IT Technician/Manager I know that email retrieval can present its own special problems, there is no reason that the email from the states system could not have been produced, yet.
        The emails from Sarah's, and others, private servers is going to take longer, since the ISP involved will have to gather that information, but; it shouldn't take that long and it certainly won't cost $15 million.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thejbomb65 (July 14, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
      2  
      part of me wants to feel bad for her.....but i just can't. she brought this on herself because she had to keep the attention on herself, if she had simply just went back to being a governor and did her job, she would have a much better shot at 2012
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bruce1ace (July 14, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
      2  
      Liberal bloggers did conservatives a favor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 14, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
        2  
        That is true if she stays gone. I am betting she tries a run at the Presidency in 2012. Then you guys get a whole new round of embarassment
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bruce1ace (July 14, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
          2  
          She will last about as long as Dan Quayle did in 1996.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (July 14, 2009 6:44 pm ET)
            2  
            I agree. There have to be some adults left in the Republican party that are just not this stupid. Has to be...right?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (July 14, 2009 6:44 pm ET)
               
            I agree. There have to be some adults left in the Republican party that are just not this stupid. Has to be...right?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by congero6189599 (July 14, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
      1  
      Someone else posted this article on another post on Sarah Palin i don't remember who but I think this article is timely here is the link:http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2009/03/17/Governor-Palins-Big-Energy-Battles?page=5#page=5
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kydem09 (July 14, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
        4
      I think it's dangerous when media outlets start broadcasting bloggers' entries as news. As was the case when a blogger suggested that Palin's baby was actually her grandson. While I don't have a problem with bloggers in general, I have an enormous problem with so-called legitimate journalists who rely on blogs as credible news sources without any independent investigation.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (July 14, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
        6  
        Yeah that would be dangerous were it to actually happen. Can you show us what news outlets reported the Palins baby was her grandson rumor as news? See I remember the rumor. I certainly dont remember any respectable news outlets reporting it as news. Now FOX will talkers like Hannity will tout rumormonger Drudge or WorlNutDaily articles and attack the media in general for NOT pretending its news but other than that I never see what you are accusing the media of doing.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 14, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
          4  
          That's just it. I do remember news networks reporting on the rumor, and saying that it wasn't true, but I'd LOVE to see a MSM outlet that carried the story as being true. It just didn't happen.

          It's another case of where Simple Sarah said something was true, and some folks (like kydem09 above) believed it. The bad old liberal media, picking on poor Sarah Palin again.

          The media didn't shovel the story he's talking about. Not at all.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dandelion (July 14, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
            3  
            You're right. I remember watching closely as that unfolded, because I thought the original Daily Kos post was reckless and irresponsible. Not only did the mainstream media ignore the story until AP reported Palin's reaction to it, so did all the other noted blogs except for Andrew Sullivan.

            Palin has never been one to let the truth get in the way of a good outrage, however (see: Letterman joke), so she milked the indignation for all it was worth.

            I don't know if this habit is a cynical political ploy, or if the woman's got some serious cognitive dissonance going on, but in either case it makes her unfit to hold any elected office.



            Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (July 14, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
          5  
          "I have an enormous problem with so-called legitimate journalists who rely on blogs as credible news sources without any independent investigation."

          Personally, I have an enormous problem with "media outlets" that broadcast anything as news which they haven't actually confirmed, whether it comes from bloggers or "former Congressional staffers," (thank you, Judith Miller), or unnamed "Administration Officials." If I remember correctly, Ben Bradlee wouldn't print anything about Watergate that Woodward and Bernstein hadn't confirmed with two independent sources. That's journalism, and it's sadly lacking today. We were much better served when reporters were hard-drinking, ink-stained wretches, than we are now that they've become media celebrities.

          That last sentence is, of course, a flaming generality, subject to all the well-known flaws of generalities.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne1 (July 14, 2009 5:59 pm ET)
            6  
            That last sentence is, of course, a flaming generality, subject to all the well-known flaws of generalities.

            Not to worry, sir. Most of us can extropolate your meaning with no flaws whatsoever. I'm a generalist myself. ;-)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (July 14, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
              5  
              A generalist?

              Then you must outrank Colonel Sanders, correct?

              I never made it past corpuscle.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by juliajayne1 (July 14, 2009 9:20 pm ET)
                5  
                I could never outrank the ass admiral, Colonel Sanders...;-)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 15, 2009 3:30 am ET)
                  5  
                  True, I'm pretty rank. Is ass admiral a promotion??
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne1 (July 15, 2009 9:21 am ET)
                    5  
                    It's the highest ranking insult one can attain. Congratulations, sir!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 15, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
                      1  
                      This is quite a week for me. I'm still reveling in my belly-flop competition victory over the weekend, and now this promotion. I'm very proud.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 15, 2009 11:39 am ET)
                    4  
                    Is ass admiral a promotion??
                    I don't know. I haven't seen any billboards or commercials yet, so it's probably not a well-run promotion...
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Conchobhar (July 15, 2009 12:08 am ET)
                4  
                I never made it past corpuscle.

                False modesty is in bloody bad taste, Your Majesty.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (July 15, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
        1  
        "I think it's dangerous when media outlets start broadcasting bloggers' entries as news."

        Right. Show us where that happened.

        "While I don't have a problem with bloggers in general, I have an enormous problem with so-called legitimate journalists who rely on blogs as credible news sources without any independent investigation."

        Then I guess you have utter disdain for Hannnity, Drudge, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Beck and basically the entire Fox News organization?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (July 15, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
           
        "I think it's dangerous when media outlets start broadcasting bloggers' entries as news."

        Right. Show us where that happened.

        "While I don't have a problem with bloggers in general, I have an enormous problem with so-called legitimate journalists who rely on blogs as credible news sources without any independent investigation."

        Then I guess you have utter disdain for Hannnity, Drudge, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Beck and basically the entire Fox News organization?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dmhack (July 16, 2009 4:25 am ET)
        2  
        I have an enormous problem with so-called legitimate journalists who rely on talking points from failed political parties as credible new sources.

        Without the Alaskan bloggers we still might believe the load of BS the Republicans put out there about Palin. These bloggers have gone after Sarah on the facts alone and that was more than enough to show what a fraud she has been. I'm still waiting to hear someone in the MSM talk about how much it's going to cost to call the state legislature back into session to deal with Sarah's impulsive resignation. Maybe if we gave them talking points...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MOInkslinger (July 14, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
      3  
      Sarah Palin held my attention for about 30 days last fall until I realized John McCain had picked a green tomato with his selection of Palin. After the election, I continued to watch Palin as she stumbled through her job as Governor, reviewed the numerous AK bloggers who provided mountains of information on her, watched her petty attacks on Levi, Dave Letterman and others and observed a woman in a meltdown. Kudos to the AK bloggers who did what other investigative reporters failed to do and what the Republicans should have done before her selection. Sarah Palin is a star by selection, not election. One can only hope that one day Sarah will call a press conference and no media will attend and the country will be rid of the Britney Spears of politics.

      Palin is long on ambition and short on ability. She is attracted to the media like a bug to a light bulb and the media can’t get enough of her antics. She is so polarizing that whatever she says no matter how trivial causes praise from her Sarasites and causes the liberals to cringe.

      At this time the Republican Party needs a unifying force, not someone who is going to divide the party even further.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by spongeworthy (July 14, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      7  
      I was overseas when McCain's team picked her. (McCain didn't, of course, since he'd only met her twice.) I watched the clips and read the reviews and was flabbergasted at the way the SCLM gushed over her. Seriously, can you imagine the way the media would have eviscerated Clinton if she'd compared HERSELF to a pit bull?!

      Now Palin can go home, put her feet up, relax with a cup of coffee and watch the sun set on Russia.
      Report Abuse