About us Login Get email updates
Julie Millican
Print

Media Matters: Move over, Drudge, there's a new sheriff in town

September 25, 2009 11:09 pm ET

It used to be common knowledge that Matt Drudge ruled the media's world. These days, Drudge must be jealous. If the past few months have shown us anything, it's that Drudge's position as the media's assignment editor is now filled by Fox News' Glenn Beck.

Beck has made no bones about his desire to shape the media's agenda. He's Fox News' Czar War commander in chief, lead ACORN crusher, resident conspiracy theorist, and favored "rodeo clown," all wrapped into one.

One would think that the mainstream media would be wary of covering stories promoted by a man who, while role-playing as President Obama, pretended to pour gasoline on the "average American" and asked Obama, "[W]hy don't you just set us on fire?" But one would be wrong.

Beck brought to us the 9-12 Project, which served as the inspiration for the 9-12 "March on Washington," when Americans tearfully came together as we did "the day after 9-11" ... to protest taxes, health care reform, government spending, and an African-American who has taken over the White House. Did the media sit out the story of tens of thousands of Beck and Fox News fans invading D.C. to protest these things? Nope. While Fox News claimed that media outlets "missed" the story of the 9-12 protests, as TVNewser.com noted, "those other networks were there" at the 9-12 protests. As Howard Kurtz wrote in The Washington Post, "[T]he other networks indeed covered the protest, which -- like similar demonstrations across the country -- were heavily promoted by Fox, especially talk show host Glenn Beck."

The media have paid equal attention to Beck and Fox News' war on Obama's "czars." Beck led the charge in attacking White House green jobs adviser Van Jones, accusing him of all manner of sins. After ColorOfChange.org -- a group co-founded by Jones -- initiated a campaign against Beck for calling Obama a "racist," Beck amped up his attacks on Jones. But instead of pointing out the potential motive behind Beck's relentless assault, the media merely credited Beck for keeping the Jones story alive. Now that Beck has shifted his sights to other Obama "czars," the media have dutifully followed, increasing their coverage of FCC chief diversity officer Mark Lloyd and Cass Sunstein, who was confirmed to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

Beck has also repeatedly promoted allegations -- originally made on Beck favorite Andrew Breitbart's BigHollywood.com -- that the National Endowment for the Arts and its former spokesman Yosi Sergant were "creating a propaganda machine for the president of the United States." Once again, the media were right behind Beck. On the September 22 edition of his CNN program, Lou Dobbs advanced attacks on the White House, stating that there are "[n]ew concerns tonight that the Obama administration may be politicizing the arts, the National Endowment for the Arts, encouraging groups to produce art work promoting the president's agenda." George Will wrote in his September 17 Washington Post column that the controversy shows "the Obama administration's incontinent lust to politicize everything." The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Politico, and ABC News? Each covered the White House's issuing of new guidelines that, as The New York Times wrote, "instructed government agencies to keep politics away from the awarding of federal grants."

Beck's been busy. In addition to making plans to hijack the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur, September 22 brought us the release of Beck's second book of 2009, the ironically titled Arguing with Idiots. In it, Beck is engaged in an ongoing argument with "the idiot," who comes armed with some truly idiotic statements, such as, "They may not be perfect, but France is doing socialism right -- we should be more like them," and, "Private schools aren't beholden to unions, but they should be closed because they're only for the rich." Beck fearlessly tears down these strawmen throughout the 300-page book.

Beck attacks "Nanny State-ism" by criticizing drunken-driving laws, writing, "The Nanny State approach is to use the police department to set up roadblocks and spot-checks," and stating that since "[t]he largest percentage of vehicular deaths related to alcohol are from repeat offenders," the "commonsense solution is that you lose your license after a second DUI. Forever. Problem solved." Beck never says whether he felt the same way when he was reportedly arrested for "speeding in his DeLorean with one of the car's gull-wing doors wide open," after which a former colleague said Beck was "completely out of it."

Beck's book has also raised the question of whether Beck supports the slave trade. While purporting to explain to an "idiot" the Founding Fathers' true intentions, Beck praises an obsolete provision of the U.S. Constitution that prohibited Congress from outlawing the slave trade before 1808 and capped taxes on the slave trade at $10 per slave. In explaining the provision, Beck doesn't mention slavery, saying instead that the provision means that the Founders apparently "felt like there was a value to being able to live here" and lamenting: "Not anymore. These days we can't ask anything of immigrants -- including that they abide by our laws." Umm ...

If one were yearning for some good ol' fashioned racial stereotyping, Beck doesn't disappoint! His attack on the 14th Amendment, which guarantees that "[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States ... are citizens of the United States," comes complete with illustrations of a man and baby wearing sombreros. Yes, his book has illustrations. In fact, the entire book is designed to look as though it were printed on antiqued, dog-eared paper. You know, like the Constitution.

Beck also subtitled a section of his book "The chapter Americans just won't write," which is little more than 18 pages of Mexico-bashing lined with text insets that parody NBC's "The More You Know" public service announcements. In these insets, the familiar shooting star of the NBC graphic has been replaced with a cartoon sombrero, and the slogan "The More You Know" has been changed to "The Less You Know." The chapter features cartoonish Mexicans wearing sombreros and absurdly thick mustaches, and a cartoon of a Chinese takeout container that's meant to represent -- you guessed it -- Chinese immigrants.

In his chapter titled "U.S. Presidents: A Steady Progression of Progressives," Beck treats us to his list of the "Top Ten Bastards of All Time." The occupants of that list, in ascending order, are Pol Pot, Robert Mugabe, Teddy Roosevelt, Bernie Madoff, Adolf Hitler, Keith Olbermann, Pontius Pilate, FDR, Tiger Woods, and Woodrow Wilson. That's right, in Beck's book, mass slaughter of millions of innocents makes you a less reprehensible person than the presidents who won both World Wars for the United States.

Because with Beck, regardless of their actual ideology, these people are all progressive, with the exception of Tiger Woods, who appeared to make the list because he has "a Swedish-supermodel wife, a gazillion dollars, and ... plays golf for a living ... bastard!" In Beck's world, any progressive is an enemy, and any enemy is progressive.

Beck's conspiracy-addled mind treated us this week to hysterical rantings about how Obama, the SEIU, ACORN, the Tides Foundation, and other unnamed unions will "set wage[s]" in this country by dictating "maximum wage" to redistribute wealth. Beck viewed a video of schoolchildren "singing a song for Barack Obama" as an "indoctrination" linked to Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, the NEA, the Tides Foundation, and Jones. If one were to tune into Beck's television show, one would likely find Beck furiously scribbling on a chalkboard, desperately trying to illustrate the elaborate progressive conspiracy to overthrow the republic. On September 22, Beck laughably denied being a "conspiracy theorist" to CBS News' Katie Couric, but the next day, he admitted his conspiracy theories sometimes make him "feel like Russell Crowe from A Beautiful Mind."

No one should be surprised by Beck's behavior. As Salon's Alexander Zaitchik reported, "In his 2003 book, 'Real America,' Beck refers to himself as a borderline schizophrenic." Zaitchik also documented Beck's rise as a broadcaster, which was marked by cruel attacks and "racial hang-ups." According to Zaitchik, after a rival radio host's wife had a miscarriage, " 'Beck called her live on the air and says, "We hear you had a miscarriage," remembers Brad Miller, a former Y95 DJ and Clear Channel programmer. 'When Terry [Kelly, wife of Beck's rival] said, "Yes," Beck proceeded to joke about how Bruce [Kelly, the rival DJ] apparently can't do anything right -- about he can't even have a baby.' " Racial hang ups? Vicious personal assaults? Over-the-top childishness? Sounds familiar.

Other major stories this week

Does Lou Dobbs think he works for Fox News?

Speaking of Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs has recently pushed a number of the same right-wing narratives that have been aggressively championed by Beck and Fox News, in addition to defending Beck's remarks calling Obama a "racist" with a "deep-seated hatred for white people." In recent weeks, Dobbs -- like Beck and many others on Fox -- has called for a "vigorous investigation" of ACORN and said that unless there is a "full-blown FBI investigation," then it will amount to "a sham." He's pushed the conservative attack that the NEA is "politicizing the arts" and has decried as "propaganda" an educational video.

On the September 22 broadcast of his radio show, Dobbs referred to ACORN's decision to appoint former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger to lead an internal inquiry into the organization as "such a sham" and called for "a full, and, I mean, absolutely righteous, vigorous, investigation of everyone running that organization, everything it's tried to do," and "its relationship to the Obama administration." Dobbs added: "I truly believe, unless there is that full-blown FBI investigation that you've asked for of ACORN, that -- you know, that is, to me, prima facie evidence that this Justice Department, under Attorney General Eric Holder, has been absolutely politicized to the point that it is not functioning and serving the interests of the American people or this country." Beck expressed similar opinions during his September 15 Fox News show.

On his September 22 CNN television show, Dobbs hyped a story favored by Beck and Fox News, reporting that there were "[n]ew concerns tonight that the Obama administration may be politicizing the arts. The National Endowment for the Arts encouraging groups to produce artwork promoting the president's agenda." As mentioned earlier, Beck was at the forefront of promoting and advancing these allegations, interviewing the artist who secretly taped the NEA conference call on September 1 and claiming that the "people involved in a conference call, including the White House, knew that this was on the fence, if not outright illegal. They knew for sure that this would outrage you if it would ever get out."

Hours after Beck decried as "propaganda" an educational video called The Story of Stuff, Dobbs, too, took to the television to warn of "more evidence of left-wing propaganda in our schools: An outrageous new video has surfaced -- this video being shown in classrooms all across the country. It is The Story of Stuff, as it's called, blatantly making false accusations against capitalism and the effects of human consumption on the environment."

This week's ACORN update

The conservative media's feeding frenzy on all things ACORN has continued, resulting in more ethically questionable actions on behalf the videographers involved and the right-wing press fighting for scraps. In a recent "exclusive" report, RedState.com editor-in-chief Erick Erickson analyzed "a list of [ACORN CEO] Bertha Lewis's contacts" that "just showed up one day unsolicited" from "a credible source who is no fan of ACORN" and claimed, "We did not ask for it. We did not expect to get it. But now that we have it, we should see who is in there." However, the private contact list was apparently obtained without Lewis' knowledge or permission, raising the question of whether RedState's "exclusive" was the result of theft. Not surprisingly, the questionable nature of how this information was obtained didn't stop Sean Hannity or Beck from promoting it.

Incidentally, on September 23, Los Angeles Times media critic James Rainey reported that ACORN official Lavelle Stewart "told me this week" that when the videographers, James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles, came to Stewart's ACORN office in Los Angeles disguised as a pimp and prostitute, Stewart "tried to get the 'prostitute,' who claimed she had been beaten by her pimp, to go to a women's center." This report is further evidence undermining O'Keefe's and Giles' repeated claims that they were never rebuffed at any of the ACORN offices they visited. Also, in a September 22 article, the Associated Press reported that California police said an ACORN worker contacted them about "possible human smuggling," reportedly as a result of O'Keefe and Giles' visit to a San Diego ACORN office. As you might recall, word broke last week that O'Keefe and Giles were indeed rebuffed at the Philadelphia ACORN office they visited; the employees there went so far as to file a police report, which you can view here. The conservative activists have yet to release video from the Philadelphia and Los Angeles encounters.

Also, O'Keefe's claims to have been "completely independent" were undermined by a report that O'Keefe had received thousands, possibly even tens of thousands, of dollars from a wealthy conservative donor.

Nonetheless, this week also birthed a new right-wing talking point: that Attorney General Eric Holder should appoint an independent special prosecutor to investigate ACORN. You know, because Holder can't be trusted to remain impartial. Better get Ken Starr on the phone pronto!

This week's media columns

This week's media columns from the Media Matters senior fellows: Eric Boehlert looks at how Fox's Chris Wallace became irrelevant, and Jamison Foser explains how the media's treatment of the ACORN story again demonstrates conservatives' ability to shape the debate.

Greg Lewis shows us that when Rush Limbaugh discusses Obama's foreign policy, his hyperbole is hyper in The Friday Rush, a review of Limbaugh's radio shows over the past week.

This weekly wrap-up was compiled by Julie Millican, a senior researcher at Media Matters for America.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (September 25, 2009 11:56 pm ET)
      11 3
      ouch, drudge is gonna be bumped by even a nuttier conservative.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tuersm3856 (September 27, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
        4 3
        Drudge and Beck are not conservatives. They're "NeoCons." I think you'd like conservatives if you ever saw a real one on TV or heard one on radio. Matt Drudge and Glenn Beck and all NeoCons belong behind bars for what they've done to this nation.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (September 26, 2009 12:04 am ET)
      1 6
      From talking to a couple of people that are fans and from those discussions and the three roles noted at the beginning of the article above, it must be hard to tell which role Eddie is playing at any given time.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (September 26, 2009 2:27 am ET)
      9  
      OMG, Beck refused to define "white culture" for Katie Couric.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rkallen09 (September 26, 2009 9:27 am ET)
        9 3
        He couldn't define the two words seperately. No reason to believe he could define them put together.

        Speaking as a person of the caucasion persuasion, I think I can define the phrase "white culture" in a single word.

        "Oppression"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 26, 2009 10:47 am ET)
          9 1
          Beck spends an awful lot of time discussing America, but then he makes a claim that he does not define, that Obama hates "white culture". To me, if he is going to be asking these "tough questions", then he will have to know what the question entails.

          To me, I take it that he believes Obama is against traditional American values based on our European heritage, which I truly disagree with. Beck's comments are like hanging a No Irish Need Apply sign in a window. Beck does not want a different culture.

          I am sure there are some cultural differences held by Obama. I had come from New York before moving to Florida, and there were many differences, and some people have even regarded me and my heritage as exotic, which I just don't understand, but according to those I talk to, city life is far different then rural life, and some regard rural life to be more American. I've heard similar comments made about Jews down here as well...

          If Glenn Beck expects people to answer his questions, he needs to be more clear, but instead, he raises these questions and then quickly disowns them, like setting a dog off his leash and not being responsible when it bites someone.
          --------------------
          The Midnight Review
          Mum Is The Word
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mack65 (September 26, 2009 11:23 am ET)
            2 1
            Or he could just yell "racist", or "fear monger" and then not explain why he said it. Both "sides" have their tactics and neither are right.

            I would like to see an American culture that is embraced by all. Not this divided and continuous bickering and name calling. Will there ever be a day when we can see each other based on our merits and not resort to the race game, on either side?

            BTW, we need to forget about white culture, black culture, etc... We just need to be Americans.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by sportsguydave (September 26, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
            6  
            This is why wingnuts like Beck rarely venture outside Fox or the rest of the right-wing echo chamber.

            Any time they do, they turn into blithering idiots.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mack65 (September 26, 2009 11:11 am ET)
          1 1
          Or racist?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by manndan (September 28, 2009 8:29 am ET)
          3  
          Wonder Bread and Hellmann's Mayonaise.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by manndan (September 28, 2009 8:29 am ET)
          2  
          Wonder Bread and Hellmann's Mayonaise.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by tuersm3856 (September 28, 2009 11:20 am ET)
          2  
          Actually, western culture is responsible for ENDING slavery. In many parts of the "non-white" world, it is still practiced. You must be referring to official oppression...which they test out on minorities first, but will soon be bringing to the doorstep of mainstream America.

          That is why, if for no other reason, we must care and fight for the human rights of EVERYONE in our society. The crimes of certain tyrants in Western history should not be ignorantly blamed on white culture as a whole.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Victor Colorado (September 26, 2009 10:49 am ET)
        8 2
        Pete,

        That is an amazing clip. VERY revealing. Beck is a racist and wimp.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 7:53 pm ET)
             
          Just watched it again. Katie appears to be a wimp, too. She wouldn't answer who the "people" were that wanted to know! I mean, how crazy is that! Completely side-stepped Beck's question. Even looked up and away - watch her eyes. What is happening to our country?! I'm just sayin.

          I see both sides. I understand why he wouldn't answer, and also why he should have explained the comment. The real question is why is that 3 minutes the focus at all? I didn't like Obama's comment about the "typical white person..." - it sounds racist. If anyone else had said it I do believe Katie would be interviewing him/her post haste.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Richard H. Johnson (September 26, 2009 10:51 am ET)
        2 2
        That is all you got from the interview, wow, and we wonder why the left just doesn't get it. Interesting Indeed.

        Richard.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (September 28, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
          3  
          He got a lot more. It's just that the rest of it is Becky appearing sedate, unlike his raving lunatic self on his own show.
          Thanks though, for your interest.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (September 26, 2009 2:51 am ET)
      6 1
      Media Matters: Move over, Drudge, there's a new sheriff in town

      Anyone ever play the video game from HP Games called "Westward"

      In it, once you build up your town where it is large enough for a sheriff's office, you get to pick a sheriff to protect your town:

      A rough and tough in your face kind of sheriff

      or

      A pretty boy arrogant yet afraid to fight fluffy kind of sheriff...

      That's the kind of sheriff Glenn Beck is!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fabucat58 (September 26, 2009 10:26 am ET)
        9 2
        No, I think that Glenn Beck is far more dangerous than those on the left (Olbermann, Air America) make him out to be. Already, Yosi Sargent and Van Jones have been forced to resign. Beck won't stop until he gets Obama out.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by onehunglow (September 28, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
            2
          Overbite (Olberwoman) Air America, Boy you really get a lot of knowledge from those shows. I can't even watch the sunday night football game with that blowhard olberman making a brief appearance. Glenn Beck has more sense in his trashcan than those 2 have.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 7:11 pm ET)
             
          I agree. If he were so harmless and ignorant, how would so many even recognize his name. It appears that he may have stepped in an ant bed or few, all the noise comes from the ants trying to repair their perfect worker worlds. I happen to *not* be a puppet or a drone, for either side. So the "noise" has attracted my attention - where there's smoke.....
          Report Abuse
    • Author by soopajessta420 (September 26, 2009 6:25 am ET)
      1 6
      Glenn Beck is a true patriot in every since of the word. The way that he educates Americans is awesome and funny at the same time. Beck, Limbaugh, and Hannity are pretty much my Top 3 faorite people in America with Mark Levinn and Ted Nugent being up there too.
      I like Glenn the best though because he's not preaching vote "left" or "right" but vote how you think is right for you. He also understands that it is the whole of the people in D.C. are ruining this country. Speak for yourself and use your head when making an educated decision. Thank you Glenn keep up the good work.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (September 28, 2009 9:58 am ET)
        3  
        I like Glenn the best though because he's not preaching vote "left" or "right" but vote how you think is right for you.

        We did.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 28, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
        5  
        soopajessta, if BECK, LIMBAUGH, and HANNITY are your heros, than you are a complete fool and definitly missinformed.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by HotWings (September 26, 2009 8:26 am ET)
      5 15
      Media Matters, why must you always play the race card? Can't a person disagree with Obama without being called a racist by you and the rest of the liberal media?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rkallen09 (September 26, 2009 9:11 am ET)
        12  
        Playing the race card? Was Glenn Beck playing the race card when he accused the President of being a "racist," with, "deep seated hatred for white people or the white culture?"

        Please explain.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fabucat58 (September 26, 2009 10:24 am ET)
          10 1
          I really like the way Beck accused a Yale-educated attorney of being a "convicted felon," just because he's black. Incorrectly calling an attorney a felon in front of millions is really bad. Interestingly, Beck has been arrested more times than Van Jones has. He's probably done far, far more drugs too.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mack65 (September 26, 2009 11:15 am ET)
            2 4
            1) Van Jones is a felon.
            2) Beck is a talking head, not an advisor to the president.

            So, Beck can talk, but he himself has no power. It takes the people to agree with him and for them to do something.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by rkallen09 (September 28, 2009 9:46 am ET)
              4  
              1) Van Jones is a felon.
              Van Jones has no criminal record at all.

              So if the people agreed with Glenn Beck that Van Jones was a "felon" and did not deserve to serve the President then the people got it wrong and Glenn Beck is a liar.

              If you have some other information, then please post it. Otherwise, you lose.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by grunt (September 28, 2009 9:57 am ET)
               
            Did Glenn say it was because he was black?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by kydem09 (September 28, 2009 11:47 am ET)
              2
            Fab, I could be wrong, but I don't think Beck was referring to Van Jones as a convicted felon, I think he was referring to Jeff Jones, who as the co-founder of the Weather Underground.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by grunt (September 28, 2009 9:56 am ET)
          1 6
          Yes, based on Obama saying his grandmother was a "typical white person." Based on the people Obama had surrounded himself with. Rev. Wright and Van Jones to name a couple. Do those things make Obama a racist? I don't know. That is all relative, but in Glenn's mind it does.

          I don't agree with calling everyone with a pulse a racist. When it comes to getting called on racism, the left deflects and says the right are racist for calling someone racist, but the right are always racist whether calling or being called racist.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (September 28, 2009 4:11 pm ET)
            5  
            Wha? You have any idea about typical white persons in that era of time? I do. And I know exactly what Obama was talking about.

            There is absolutely no evidence of Obama exhibiting any kind of racism. The idea that he's "surrounding" himself with people who are racists is ridiculous, pathetic and stupid.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by democracy7 (September 26, 2009 9:39 am ET)
        3  
        I did not see the race card being played. Im sorry you misread the same article I did and came up with a different conclusion. You may need new glasses.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fabucat58 (September 26, 2009 10:21 am ET)
        12 2
        Yes. Plenty of people disagree with Obama, including some far more left than MM. REAL COMMUNISTS (for example) not the Van Jones type of commie. People also criticize Obama from the right without being racist. David Brooks. Kathleen Parker.

        Glenn Beck is a racist. Pure and simple. And not because he disagrees with Obama.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (September 26, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
        5 2
        Sure, I disagree with Obama on quite a few issues and I'm not a racist, but then I don't state on public television that he hates white people, I don't make up crap to paint him as a "fascist, socialist, communist and/or any other 'ist'", I don't accuse him of palling around with terrorists, I don't try to find ANY way possible to show that he's just CAN'T be the legitimate leader of our country.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (September 26, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
        10  
        Can't a person disagree with Obama without being called a racist

        Sure people can freely disagree with Obama without being called a racist. But if you:

        Don't believe Obama is a US citizen.

        Believe Obama is the anti-Christ.

        Belive Obama is a fascist/socialist/marxist/communist

        Don't want your children to view a speech by the black man encouraging staying in school and setting goals.

        Cry at a town hall that you want your country back or say that this isn't the country you remember due to the black man being in the White House.

        Then, you're a racist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by grunt (September 28, 2009 10:11 am ET)
          1 5
          You are a racist for calling someone a socialist or communist? That is news to me. Can you show me the definition of those two systems that says you must be black to be one of those??? In fact, the majority of communists and socialists I remember from history class were white. Then again, I did go to private school, and I wan't privilaged enough to go to an American public school.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (September 28, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
            3  
            You aren't necessarily a racist for calling Obama a socialist or communist; just a moron.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by tuersm3856 (September 28, 2009 11:32 am ET)
          1 3
          That is indeed some interesting criteria you've outlined here. Thank God no one is buying it.

          What is it, anyway, with "progressives'" obsession with race and "racism"? Personally, I don't think a thing about it these days, yet on TV there is regularly some left wing pundit about to have a nervous break dowm over "racists" stopping the president from what he needs to do.

          And by the way, Obama has more white blood in him than black.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (September 28, 2009 10:20 pm ET)
            2  
            You seem to have a strange obsession yourself, with that last remark.
            Obsession with race? Try Mr. Limpball, who lost his dream job as a sports commentator because he is so obsessed with race that he couldn't believe that Donovan McNabb was being praised for his talent.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (September 28, 2009 7:28 pm ET)
        3  
        hey hotwings,check your own conservative media before you accuse us liberals of playing the race card.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by democracy7 (September 26, 2009 9:41 am ET)
      2  
      Glen Beck is diturbed and disturbing, I see him rant on clips on various shows and all I can think is he needs therapy badly and worry about the poor fools buying into his rant.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AsIfUknow (September 26, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
      4  
      http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:y_buzz_log:575634e209bbfff84b64e7266455f243/A-Rough-Week-for-Glenn-Beck?cpm=1

      This where the Beck-ocrats are lining up to sing his praises and duct tape the mouth of any rational, sane, or free-thinking American citizen.

      Warning though: the love fest for Beck may cause bleeding from the eyes, severe nausea or vomitting, constipation of the brain, and Palin supporting.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Hepatica (September 26, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
      3  
      What really scares me about Beck is that he hasn't been fired yet. I think Murdoch must be keeping him on for political reasons. He's clearly useful to big money & the GOP. Beck is gaining political power with the resignation of Jones, Yosi, the demonizing & probable defunding of ACORN, the fact that the mainstream media are starting to follow his bidding. He's a demagogue of the worst kind & needs to be stopped (of course, by peaceful means -- the will of the American public).
      Report Abuse
      • Author by grunt (September 28, 2009 10:21 am ET)
          4
        Do you think Fox really wants to lose over 3 million viewers in the 5:00 pm slot? Even if he loses advertisers, those viewers are more likely to stay on Fox News for the evening programs. "It's the economy stupid."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mookie von zipper (September 26, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
        5
      the drudge angle here is of little consequence, he'll continue to rule the internet and will continue to break stories other outlets are working on thru his vast network of moles... rush still rules radio... while beck now rivals o'reilly as the conservative king of tv, the media in general will not be driven by one guy (the diabolical murdoch notwithstanding)... it will be driven by what or whoever the sexiest story is, and for the moment, it's acorn...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by onehunglow (September 28, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
        1  
        Beck and O'Reilly are independents moron. You need to come back from that far far left turn you made.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by felixw (September 26, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
        2
      Instead of attacking the messenger, why not try addressing the message? You could get rid of Beck, Drudge, etc. and other people would rise up to ask the same questions about spending trillions of dollars of borrowed money from the Chinese to fund an out-of-control federal bureaucracy.

      Why do I get the impression that the left's constant focus on personalities is because they don't have persuasive answers to these basic questions? So they constantly change the debate to diversionary issues of TV hosts and skin color.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (September 28, 2009 10:07 am ET)
        3  
        Why do I get the impression that the left's constant focus on personalities.....

        And the right never do that? Republicans worship Sean Hannity, Rush, Ann, Glenn etc. The right have no "basic" questions! Just fear-mongering slogans. If you try to answer them, they shout you down.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
            3
          They "shout you down" with evidence supporting their opinion.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jmille426471 (September 28, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
            2  
            Exactly, those town-hall screechers are shouting well-reasoned, scholarly arguments at politicians, such as "quit killing my grandma!!", "Nazi's!!" and "go back to Kenya!!".
            Report Abuse
            • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
                 
              Evidence? Which one did you attend? I'm sure some were more exciting than others. But I don't recall any of those quotes you included being spoken by legitimate town-hall attendees. Maybe written in a writeup afterwards by others who didn't witness it.

              For a minute I thought you were being serious! Then I realized how "well-reasoned" the response was. Good one!
              Report Abuse
    • Author by pasteve (September 26, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
      4  
      Maybe he can replace Don Knotts as The Shakiest Gun in the West too while he's as it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TruthHound2009 (September 26, 2009 10:49 pm ET)
      2 10
      Beck did not "attack" Van Jones...he merely exposed Van Jones for the radical that he is by using Van's own words.

      As far as the Yosi thing...have you listen to the recording...certainly sounded like if it was something the right side of the isle was doing people here would have had a conniption. Yosi no longer holds his old position once this story broke, why is that? Because he did nothing wrong? Just like the ACORN people who did nothing wrong lost their jobs...Right?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by bobklahn (September 26, 2009 10:56 pm ET)
        2  
        At least one acorn person lost his job, even though he did nothing wrong. The guy in San Diego called the cops on O'Keefe, but was fired anyway.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (September 26, 2009 11:28 pm ET)
        6 1
        Van Jones radical? Perhaps from your point of view. He's held a lot of opinions over his life. Some well meaning but wrong, as I'm sure he'd admit today. Can you point out how his recent work trips your radical alert alarm?
        Sorry your wingnut version of the Code Napoleon doesn't get much credibilty in a real courtroom.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Flaboy (September 27, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
        6
      Apparently someone dosent watch Glenn Beck to much before writing. Beck was reporting on Van Jones way before Van Jones organization started boycotting. Insted of whining, and being so infatuated with glenn Beck, why dont the liberal media get off their butts and do some reporting with hard evidence, If Glenn beck is such a nutt job, or lier, prove him wrong, maybe Van Jones, yosi, and all them acorn workers would still have a job. You have about six major news channels on your side, against one little ole Fox
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jmille426471 (September 28, 2009 7:38 am ET)
        6  
        There, there, we know, the media is biased against conservatives and media matters just isn't being fair to poor Glenn Beck. Those poor, persecuted cons just can't seem to catch a break, can they? Teachers have a liberal bias, Universities have a liberal bias, science has a liberal bias, facts have a liberal bias etc. Even God seems to have a liberal bias these days. Oh how unfair the world is to conservatives.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by oneleft (September 28, 2009 10:48 am ET)
        3  
        that would be "liar".

        How's about you show us he's not a liar. It's been proven repeatedly that he is.

        Do you have any idea at all what ACORN is? I'm not talking about the rubbish your boys have shoved into your mind, I'm talking about in reality.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
             
          Good point. I honestly don't know what ACORN really does (good or bad). There's probably a lot more corruption than we hear about (I mean generally, not specific to ACORN). I'll do some digging to see what ACORN is about. If they are as big as it seems, there might be a deeper impact to cutting them off than anyone intended. Maybe stops the immediate "bad stuff", but what "good stuff" gets sacrificed along with it. It would not be wise to ignore the possibility.

          I'd be interested in the proof that Beck's a liar if you have any credible sources. That's quite a broad statement against someone's character.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 28, 2009 11:56 am ET)
      4  
      The stupidest part of this whole Acron story might just be that there was someone out there stupid enough to believe that THAT GUY was a pimp. And I don't just mean becasue he's a about as white as Bill Gates, this isn't about race. It's just that... well, come on! I MEAN, LOOK AT THAT DOOFUS! Can you see him keeping ANYONE in line? Hookers, customers, meth-addcicts... My mother could take this dweeb down. And if he ever met my wife... Hoo-boy, would he be in for it!

      If he's a PIMP, then I'm the world heavyweight boxing champion.

      -----------------------------------------------------------------
      And I'm not!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
          1
        Now there's an argument. It has crossed my mind that the whole thing could have been staged. In several offices. In several states. But my guess is not many have the intelligence to carry something that sophisticated out. But what the guy in the video looks like should have nothing to do with credibility. Isn't that a factor in profiling/racism? Rather than spewing out gibberish, can't we just find/face the facts? Isn't anyone interested in the effort necessary to find out what the truth is? I'm on the fence still, but I may have to find another place to find something to tip me - this place may have nothing to write about if not for Beck, Limbaugh, etc. And where are the issues? I may not hang around here - I don't need anyone to tell me what to think. But I do need unbiased information so I can make what I think are the right calls. Whose mother can beat up whoelse doesn't really help me much.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (September 28, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
          2  
          You are still deciding whether the whole thing was staged? Okay, I guess this web site isn't for ya. Good luck.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
               
            Sorry, you're right, that was unclear. I'm on the fence over where the truth really lies. The players on each side are so extremely distant, for the most part. I'm still trying to decide if maybe they're all wrong.

            My thoughts seem clearer before they get posted<g> - guess that happens a lot.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by vintel7 (September 28, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
      4  
      As for Beck, he is a dry drunk and drug addict that never addressed the root cause of his mental illnesses. His delusional belief system has all the classic characteristics of narcissism...black and white thinking, paranoid delusions, shamelessness, and a fear based mentality. America, being the country of narcissists, is the perfect venue for Beck and Dobbs to spread their virulent toxic delusions on the narcissistic populace. Beck's vitriol serves as affirmation for the mentally and intellectually challenged Republicans. As for Dobbs, he should be brought up on charges and thrown in jail for his defamation of the president's character and American citizenry. Too many morons in this country believe that freedom of speech and freedom of the press mean an abdication of responsibility for what we say. For far too long, Americans have fallen for the lie that our freedoms mean license to spread lies, hate, and vitriol. Shame on Beck and Dobbs and their unconscious followers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by AlwaysGrounded (September 28, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
          1
        I am a dry drunk too. The root cause of my mental illness is the overwhelming stupidity of the majority. I drowned myself in alcohol to avoid the reality of it. Today I don't drink. My judgement is clear, and people are still stupid. Your post says nothing - unless you believe it: "...our freedoms mean license to spread lies...." Are we not all "unconscious followers" to some degree? Without first-hand evidence, no truth - on either side - can be embraced. It's time to adjust the blinders - we need to step back so we can see more of the picture. Only then will we be able to recognize it. A ship listing left or right, either way, isn't balanced.
        Report Abuse