About us Login Get email updates
Greg Lewis
Print

The Friday Rush: Logic? A grasp of the issues? You won't find those on The Rush Limbaugh Show

October 02, 2009 7:04 pm ET

Like the rest of the media in recent months, Rush has been swept up in the health care reform debate, and his impact has been measurable. He has so far led the charge for conservatives wielding bunk talking points like death panels and other Betsy McCaughey-inspired falsehoods. But this week in particular made clear the flaw in Limbaugh's approach to reform: an obvious failure to grasp the fundamental concepts behind health care.

For weeks, Rush has been interjecting the phrase "single payer" into his diatribes against health care reform. But there are a few problems with this, the first and most apparent being that none of the bills being seriously considered by Congress would create a national single-payer health care system. But this fact doesn't seem to matter to Rush -- using these words is just a scare tactic for him. Take, for example, when he warned his audience on Wednesday that "you're gonna wake up one day and realize they all voted on single-payer health care with a public option on it."

If Congress did pass a single-payer system, you couldn't have a "public option on it." The public option is a government-run health insurance plan competing with private insurance. A nationally instituted single-payer system -- like what Canada has -- can't have a "public option" because it's pretty much the only option.

If Rush can't get his basic terminology straight, why should anyone take his opinions on health care seriously? (Maybe he needs pictures to help him better understand.)

As a famous scholar once said, buzzword-laden sentences do not a coherent argument against health care reform make:

LIMBAUGH: So, while they're planning this big national takeover of the health care plan -- single-payer, government public option, all this to bring down costs, all this to improve your care, all of this to reduce fraud and waste in government, all of this to reduce the federal deficit. I have never had my intelligence insulted like it's been insulted with this entire health care debate.

But failing his Health Care Reform 101 exam wasn't Rush Limbaugh's only problem in recent days. He also had a tendency to just say things with no evidence to support his claims. (Yes, we're aware he does this on a regular basis, but his habit noticeably flared up this week.)

These baseless assertions included Rush's claim that health care reform would result in Congress "tak[ing] over" hospitals, labs, "the medical profession," and insurance companies, all for the benefit of SEIU. Proof? Who needs proof when you have wild conjecture?

Rush also said that Democrats are "using the power of government" to deny health care to "those who don't support them." Again, there was nothing to back this claim up. Later that same day, Rush described how "all of us will be slaves" under "Obamacare" because of the "arbitrary and inhumane decisions of distant bureaucrats working in Washington." We believe that's from Section 12 of the-bill-that-Rush-Limbaugh-made-up-in-his-head, but it hasn't been printed out by the GPO yet, so we can't be sure.

And as Rush continued to lie about death panels during this discussion of "slavery," he projected his own fixation with death onto Democrats. Rush stated that it is Democrats who are "obsessed with your death" and that they are the "party of abortion and euthanasia, slavery and not liberty." The next day, Rush was at it again, responding to Rep. Alan Grayson's (D-FL) remarks that Republican health care policy amounted to a holocaust: "If there is a holocaust in this country, it is abortion."

And since we're talking about people invoking 1930s Germany -- Limbaugh and politicians alike -- this would be a good time to point out how Rush made a rather interesting reversal of a previous reversal regarding some of his more controversial comments in recent months.

It was only a couple of weeks ago that Rush claimed that he "never called" Obama a Nazi -- a claim that we refuted at the time, pointing out that Rush, despite his denial, compared Obama to Adolf Hitler and health care reform to Nazism. We kinda made a big ruckus about it.

But in spite of all those denials, on Thursday's show, Rush was at it again. Responding to Grayson's comments, Rush said:

LIMBAUGH: And just as Obama's doing, Hitler -- well, even prior to Hitler -- German socialists attempted to remake and order their country using health care as the springboard and the foundation. Same thing that's happening here. Hitler was a man of the left. Nazi is simply the term for the national socialists of Germany. They're far more in common, the national socialists and their domestic policies -- short of the Holocaust -- they're far more in common with what Obama's doing than with anybody on the right.

One more noteworthy theme from this week of Limbaugh was the way he joined his fellow conservatives in the witch hunt against "safe schools czar" Kevin Jennings. On Monday, Rush likened Jennings to Roman Polanski, and on Tuesday, he baselessly accused Jennings of having "encouraged" a relationship between a student and an adult. And on his Friday "Morning Update," Rush continued to refer to the student as a 15-year-old at the time of the incident. It became clear later in the day that the student was definitely of legal age at the time, but we don't expect a correction from Rush anytime soon.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Palouser (October 02, 2009 8:44 pm ET)
        3
      Protecting America from big, bad Rush, are you, young man?

      How's that going for you, anyway?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (October 02, 2009 8:54 pm ET)
      5  
      Right now for-profit healthcare industry employees make decisions about what will be covered and who might be excluded for coverage because of pre-existing conditions. If we are successful in getting healthcare reform, some small percentage of people will be covered by a government-controlled plan, and those people will have a not for profit group of employees to look out for them.

      A careful look at the facts debunks everything he says!
      Report Abuse
        • Author by dash63 (October 04, 2009 8:11 pm ET)
            3
          Facts, I havnt even seen a bill, Ive seen the Baucus bill I hope thats not the bill youre refering too. Is there a plan?,is there an Obama bill? No theres not.If its the Baucus bill, Then the address before congress was full of untruths. And there were no facts therin.If anyone reading this can produce a bill that was written before The Presidents speech then I apollogize profusely.Im not a racist and I dont support Rush Limbaugh but I think if the argument is facts, then he has the upper hand.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (October 05, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
               
            How about the "fact" that right now there is an insurance employee who makes the decisions about what illnesses and treatments to cover? That's a fact. If there is some government-controlled health care, then there will be a not for profit government employee making those decisions. That is also a fact. It doesn't matter what specific bill is passed!

            And we don't believe you will apologize profusely about any false smear. Obama didn't say, nor did he imply, that there was already a bill created.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 03, 2009 12:32 am ET)
        8  
        Too bad conservatives can't be bothered to even PEEK at the facts, EVER!

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        I really hate this lying scumbag.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 03, 2009 2:17 am ET)
          2  
          I am really glad you posted that correction, because I had no idea what btehr could possibly be in English! LOL
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (October 03, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
            1  
            LOL. That's my "edit" function: Re-Post and "Report Abuse" (duplicate post.)

            Report Abuse
      • Author by tomplumdum (October 03, 2009 11:36 am ET)
           
        I lost my healthcare in early 2004. after everal jobs that don;t offer or make it hard to get (medical Bennies) I got a job in 2007 with Health care. It went into effect in six months and We waited one year paying premiuns for pre-existing conditions to be covered. So far this year We have been treated for every single possible medical condition we could possibly have very good coverage.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pazzman (October 03, 2009 1:08 am ET)
      1  
      But this won't stop him from being allowed to lie and moan. Gripe and racialize. Segregate and witch hunt. Will somebody shut this evil down. Please!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (October 03, 2009 6:24 pm ET)
      3  
      RUSH and the rest of the RIGHT WING NUTJOBS never let facts get in the way of making talking points.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by papa bear3 (October 03, 2009 9:38 pm ET)
      2  
      Rush, et al, throw out "info-toids," little bits of unrelated information, just like cluster bombs, that they know their listeners will assemble into some theory, then will listen some more so to verify what they just heard.

      Rush and Beck know the truth, well maybe not Beck, but their paydays are so good how could they pass it up. Plus the fun of watching all those teabaggers running around under their control.

      We have to keep a weight watch on Rush, that guy is really getting big.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnbryansfontaine (October 04, 2009 8:37 am ET)
      1  
      Those on the right always neglect to mention that Hitler believed that socialism was a right-wing ideology:

      "1. 'National' and 'social' are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it 'National Socialist.' We said to ourselves that to be 'national' means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, eve to die for it. And similarly to be 'social' means so to build up the State and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it.

      Munich speech, April 12th, 1921

      Rush's Lie about Hitler could not be larger: Hitler was a man of the right.
      Report Abuse