Media Matters: Limbaugh's NFL dream slips through his "formerly nicotine-stained fingers"
Six years after Rush Limbaugh was forced to resign in disgrace from his gig on ESPN's Sunday NFL Countdown for, as CNN reported at the time, "his statement that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media wanted to see a black quarterback succeed," the nation's top conservative radio host was dropped from a group seeking to purchase the NFL's St. Louis Rams.
A statement released by Dave Checketts -- a member of the group seeking to buy the Rams and the chairman of the NHL's St. Louis Blues -- said Limbaugh was dropped because his "involvement ... has become a complication ... endangering our bid."
"Complication" sure is a nice way of putting what transpired this week.
In the week since El Rushbo confirmed his intention to help buy the Rams: the executive director of the NFL players union came out against Limbaugh's bid, saying football "overcomes division and rejects discrimination"; Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay said he "couldn't even think of" supporting Limbaugh's Rams bid due to his divisive rhetoric; NFL players reportedly said they "wouldn't play for" a Limbaugh-owned team due to his "flat-out racist" comments; NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said Limbaugh's "divisive comments are not what the N.F.L. is all about"; and a host of sports media figures blasted the very notion of the right-wing talker being an NFL owner based on his controversial statements.
As you might imagine, Limbaugh didn't take the controversy surrounding the bid or his ultimate exclusion from the group seeking to buy the Rams lying down.
Attempting to defend himself from mounting criticism, Limbaugh said -- with a straight face, no less -- "I'm colorblind. ... I treat everybody equally." Of course, such a statement ignores his "colorblind" history of racially charged comments. Who could forget these gems?
- "We are being told that we have to hope [President Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black." [1/21/09]
- "I do believe" Obama is an "angry black guy." [7/27/09]
- "Obama's entire economic program is reparations." [7/22/09]
- Obama is "Halfrican-American." [7/24/07]
Or my personal favorite: the time Limbaugh invented a "racial component" to Iraq war vet Paul Hackett's decision to withdraw from a Democratic primary campaign for U.S. Senate in Ohio. Yep, after Hackett's departure from the race against then-Rep. Sherrod Brown, Rush said, "And don't forget, Sherrod Brown is black. There's a racial component here, too." In fact, Brown is white.
One needn't dig too far back -- Rush was happy to offer more racially charged statements this week. For starters, he whined that the NFL was an "outpost of racism and liberalism," apparently missing last month's report by the Center for Responsive Politics that showed that since 1989, NFL teams, owners, players and personnel gave overwhelmingly to the GOP.
In what can only be described as an odd attempt to beat back criticism for his past remarks, Limbaugh turned to basketball, complaining that rappers "own parts of NBA teams" and "[t]hey're celebrated -- 'Cool, daddy, cool!' " He even said that acclaimed sportscaster "Bob Costas is a ... very unhappy little diva." Is it any wonder that the world of professional athletics resoundingly rejected El Rushbo, dashing his dream of team ownership?
Limbaugh's defensive line was quick to come to his aid. Right-wing pundit Ann Coulter said NFL players would pick Rush over "Nazi collaborator" George Soros because "a lot of them" are "real Christians" -- as opposed to fake ones? MSNBC's resident cranky uncle and in-house bigot Pat Buchanan played defense, as well, which unsurprisingly resulted in more bigotry.
The Wall Street Journal came to Rush's defense with an op-ed making a ... I'll just say it -- stupid false comparison between Limbaugh and Keith Olbermann's work on NBC's Football Night in America. The Journal claimed not to have "heard anyone on the right say Mr. Olbermann's nightly ad-hominem rants should disqualify him from hanging around the NFL." Perhaps the Journal could use a hearing test, because various right-wing media figures and bloggers have done just that.
So, no, El Rushbo won't be purchasing a pro football team any time soon. He could always try his "formerly nicotine-stained" hand (or "fingers," as he would say) at owning a fantasy football team.
Then again, he's got the 2010 Miss America pageant to look forward to, where he'll be serving as a judge.
Other major stories this week
Fox News vs. The White House
Be sure to check out the latest from Media Matters' Eric Boehlert, who offers up a compelling "memo to the media," which reads, in part:
Fox News has changed the rules. Now the press needs to change the way it covers Fox News.
Rupert Murdoch's cable cabal is now, first and foremost, a political entity. Fox News has transformed itself into the Opposition Party of the Obama White House, which, of course, is unprecedented for a media company in modern-day America. That partisan embrace means the news media have to expand beyond typing up Fox News-ratings-are-up and the White-House-is-angry stories, and it needs to start treating the cable channel for what it is: a partisan animal.
The press needs to drop its longstanding gentleman's agreement not to write about other news outlets as news players -- not to get bogged down in criticizing the competition -- because those newsroom rules no longer apply. Fox News has exited the journalism community this year. It's a purely political player, and journalists ought to start covering it that way.
I understand Fox News still wants to enjoy the benefits of being seen as a news operation. It still wants the trappings and the professional protections that go with it. But it no longer functions as a news outlet, so why does the rest of the press naively treat it that way?
Fox News is now at the forefront of a political movement.
[...]
Completely detached from traditional newsroom standards, Fox News has become a political institution, and the press needs to start treating it that way. The press needs to treat Fox News the same way it treats the Republican National Committee, even though, frankly, the RNC probably can't match the in-your-face partisanship that Fox News flaunts 24/7. Think about it: Murdoch's "news" channel now out-flanks the Republican Party when it comes to ceaseless partisan attacks on the White House.
Truth is, in recent years the RNC used to use Fox news to help amplify the partisan raids that national Republicans launched against Democrats. It was within the RNC that the partisan strategy was mapped out and initiated. (i.e. it was the RNC that first pushed the Al-Gore-invented-the-Internet smear). But it was on talk radio and Fox News where the partisan bombs got dropped. Today, that relationship has, for the most part, been inversed. Now it's within Fox News that the partisan witch hunts are plotted and launched, and it's the RNC that plays catch-up to Glenn Beck and company.
And I'm sorry, but the Fox News defense that it's a just a few on-air pundits who (relentlessly) attack the White House and that the news team still plays it straight is, at this point, a joke. What kind of "news" team, in the span of five days, airs 22 clips of health reform forums featuring only people who oppose reform? What kind of "news" team tries to pass off a GOP press release as its own research -- typo and all? What kind of "news" team promotes a partisan political rally? (Or did I miss the 100-plus free ads that CNN aired in 2003 promoting an anti-war rally?)
[...]
It's clear that in 2009, Fox News is no longer in the business of journalism. Fox News isn't trying to inform people, it's trying to misinform them. That's not journalism. It's propaganda. But as long as the press continues to hold up the façade of journalism, Fox News will try to hide behind it.
Boehlert's takedown of Fox News can be read in its entirety here.
We're through Dobbs' foggy looking glass (or camera lens)
CNN's Lou Dobbs is none too pleased with his critics. At issue is a new television commercial from Media Matters and America's Voice that was to air during CNN's broadcast of its upcoming Latino in America special. In what appeared to be talking points prepared in the style of Mad Libs, Dobbs denounced the ad, claiming it was created by "George Soros attack groups" as "propaganda."
CNN, for its part, refused to run the ad -- skipping out on yet another opportunity to provide some accountability and distance itself from its ongoing Dobbs problem. In August, Media Matters bought a week of ad time on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News in Washington, D.C., New York, and Atlanta to air an ad calling on CNN to address Dobbs' repeated promotion of birther conspiracy theories. As The Huffington Post reported at the time, "[F]ive of the six cable providers contracted for the project have informed the group that they are declining to put the spot on CNN."
Dobbs was in rare form this week in going after his critics. He decried the "mad propaganda emanating ... from the extreme left, the Media Matters folks, all of them funded by George Soros" and complained to Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) that "left-wing ethnocentric interest groups" are "calling for my firing from CNN." You know what happens when you point a finger, right, Lou? That's right: Three are pointing back at you.
Firing or reining in Dobbs may be a moot point anyway. According to recent reports, Dobbs met with Fox News president Roger Ailes over dinner last month. Could Dobbs be taking his immigrant-smearing hysteria and loony quest for Obama's already-available birth certificate to Fox Business Network?
We do agree with this one, perhaps Freudian, comment Dobbs made this week: "It's getting so you can't trust cable networks anymore."
EXCLUSIVE: CNN's Castellanos on the take from insurance industry
This week, Media Matters exclusively obtained evidence that CNN contributor Alex Castellanos' political consulting firm, National Media, is the ad buyer for the new ad blitz by the insurance industry group America's Health Insurance Plan (AHIP) that attacks Democratic health care reform plans.
According to the detailed ad buy information obtained by Media Matters, Castellanos is responsible for placing, beginning October 11, more than $1 million of AHIP advertising in five states. A review of National Media's client list indicates that Castellanos' work for AHIP isn't his only conflict with regard to health care reform. National Media has done work for the Federation of American Hospitals, the pharmaceutical industry group PhRMA, and the HCA Sunrise Hospital. Castellanos last appeared on CNN September 30; during a debate with Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) on The Situation Room, Castellanos defended Republican health care proposals.
After noting CNN's responsibility to properly identify Castellanos' industry ties and ensure that his obvious conflict of interest does not tarnish the network's future coverage of the health care debate, Washington Post Co.'s Greg Sargent reported that CNN admitted that Castellanos worked for the health insurance industry and promised full disclosure in the future.
This week's media columns
This week's media columns from the Media Matters senior fellows: in a message to the media, Eric Boehlert says Fox News is now the opposition party, Jamison Foser discusses the media's Glenn Beck problem, and Karl Frisch wonders if Dr. Fox-enstein -- errr ... Roger Ailes is building another monster.
Simon Maloy notes Rush Limbaugh's fantasy football conspiracy in The Friday Rush, a review of Limbaugh's radio shows over the past week.
Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, MySpace, and Digg
Media Matters maintains active online communities on the nation's leading social networking sites. Be sure to join us on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, MySpace, and Digg and join in the discussion.
Do you listen to podcasts? Try the Media Matters Minute
For months now, radio shows and stations throughout the country have been carrying the Media Matters Minute, a daily minute-long recap of our work topped off with the "most outrageous comment" of the day. We encourage you to subscribe (iTunes/RSS) to the Minute's daily podcast hosted by Media Matters' Ben Fishel.
This weekly wrap-up was compiled and edited by Karl Frisch, a senior fellow at Media Matters for America. Frisch also contributes to County Fair, a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web, as well as original commentary. You can follow him on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube or sign up to receive his columns by email.


















Could it be the guy that runs his mouth so much he should have a Sore Jaw?
He is defended by "O'Reilly the Tiller Killer" who's staff couldn't find a single Racist Quote.
Fox News, a network that coulnd't find the Truth if it was lodged down their own Throats.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
Fox News "Barack's Baby Momma" Mr. Limbaugh, A man not afraid to pitch a few Racially Tinged Lies.
It's been said that "Birds of a Feather Flock Together" but most are looking for a Mate.
David Duke, Rush Limbaugh & News Corp. The Three Amigo's of Hate.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
~
NFL Owners Who Use the N-Word and Wet Their Pants On Stage
by Stage Right
And now a word from an NFL owner:
“And the game done chose me to bring pain to ni--as and pu--y holes, they one in the same.” - I’m Real, co-written by Jennifer Lopez, minority owner of the Miami Dolphins.
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sright/2009/10/16/nfl-owners-who-use-the-n-word-and-wet-their-pants-on-stage/
=============================================================
The debate over Rush Limbaugh's NFL bid is roiling the racial landscape. This evening, after Juan Williams explained that Rush's "Barack the Magic Negro" parody was based on a column by an African-American author, a black radio talk show host told Williams to "go back to the porch."
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2009/10/16/oreilly-guest-juan-williams-go-back-porch
Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm.
The intent is what is important here. Did the black author and Rush have the same intent? Did Jennifer Lopez intend to smear blacks?
I can say the n word when I am describing someone else who was saying the n word in an offensive way and not be offensive at all.
JLo can say the n word and be using it in a non-offensive way.
This baloney of false equivalence gets boring to shoot down time after time after time, but don't worry, we'll keep at it until you stop with the false equivalency arguments!
Obama the Magic Negor..
Also, after reading the article in question again, isn't it interesting that within the article that these guys keep saying the words "Barack the Magic Negro" appears, it actually never says that in the article or the title?
So, yet again, we find Limbaugh, and his defenders, making things up.
~
YOU should try doing your own research.
The lyrics YOU cited are a RE-MIX of Jennifer Lopez's ORIGINAL song, by rap artist Ja Rule.
They're NOT Jennifer Lopez's ORIGINAL lyrics!
Ja Rule : I'm Real Lyrics...
Ja Rule Lyrics and Songs...
Number 1: Jo-Lo doesn't own any part of the Dolphins, her husband does. And no, it's not the same thing. Marc Anthony owns part of the Dolphins. So you fail on that part. Jo-Lo, not a minority partner of the Dolphins.
Number 2: As someone else said, the lyrics you posted, were not written by Jo-Lo, they came from a remix of her song by someone else (Ja Rule I believe it was). So, fail #2, and since your little nugget of information came from Breitbart, we can assume it's wrong anyway.
Number 3: The original article that referenced the Magic Negro, was a well written article about how that certain frame of reference came about, and how the media, and the country in general was putting Barack Obama into that role (the non-threatening nice black man, ala Morgan Freeman, or Sidney Poitier before him, I suggest you read the actual article). And yes, it was written by a black man. And no, Rush's "parody" song has nothing to do with the article, but instead is an apparent attempt at inciting, yes, racial hatred. So, once again, you fail again.
Bringing up instances of other racist incidents is totally irrelevant. Rush's investment partners made the decision to push him out. Rush is reaping the benefit of his big, racist, hate-filled mouth. He and his blind followers are unable to accept his responsibility.
[Oh, BTW, your continued use of a second-grade teacher's attempt to honor this country's first black president during Black History Month shows how childish you are. I'm sure the children understood that childish little ditty better than you did. And you think you represent real conservatism? How very sad.]
As you suffer from the horrible "racial attacks" from Obama and drift through life under the oppressive burden of a life shared with Jessie jackson, remember that in Obama's case, you can vote for someone else in 3 years. In this case, the NFL made the feelings known and had an impact on the decision.
Oh and Soros is hiding behind your couch right now! Get him before he gets you!
Rush Limbaugh, Mr. Colorblind, has said so many racist things in his lifetime on talk radio, it's laughable that you think it's laughable that he's not a racist.
How is Jesse Jackson a racist? How is Al Sharpton a racist? Tell me how, because I'm pretty sure, you can't do it.
How is President Obama a racist again? Please, explain in detail. I mean, he's so racist, that he has a white mother, and white grandparents. The quote about his mother? You're bringing that up again? It's not a racist statement, and if you think it is, maybe you should go back and really think about what racism is.
I'm not full of glee because Limbaugh isn't able to buy something that he thought he could, I'm full of glee because of people like you who seem to think he's been wronged because the NFL owners don't want his money.
This isn't about left or right, it's about Limbaugh being an a-hole, and people not wanting to be associated with him. Limbaugh isn't hurt by this? Well, from all of the whining (by Limbaugh himself, and people like you), apparently, he is hurt. I mean, fer' crying out loud, he had an Op-Ed in the WSJ about not getting what he wants, and gosh darn it, he's going to hold his breath until he gets it! You guys are just really made and whiney when the free market that you so cherish and uphold bites you in the butt.
What does Soros have to do with this? Nothing. You bring him into this as some sort of "liberal boogeyman".
We're not talking about NFL players who break the law, and other things like that. We're talking about Limbaugh's failed bid and rejection. And that's the funny part. If someone is in the NFL, and they break the law (Vick as a prime example), they need to be tossed in the clink if they're convicted of whatever crime it is they commit. In case you haven't noticed, the NFL IS cracking down on their players when they step out of line (Again, Vick, Burress, and some others).
But I dare anyone to show me one example of that actually happening.
It doesn't. He is being castigated because of his offensive speech - speech that should be offensive to anyone except racists, that is. Everyone, regardless of their political philosophy, should condemn some of the things that have come out of Rush's mouth - there's a good list of them above.
Finding a critical analysis of recent political and financial calamities is not as easy. Also real penetrating investigations are apparently not as entertaining as hearing Rush or Hannity spin themselves silly as the heroes of automatic uncompromised correctness. Reality based media is not easy or profitable.
It was not because he held conservative views.
don't confuse this with harry reid calling for rush to be dropped from AFR because of his mischaracterzation of rush's "phony soldiers" comment... because nothing came of that other than reid making an ass of himself and rush auctioning off a letter of complaint reid had written to clearchannel's ceo for 2 million dollars, which he donated to a marine charity, and matched with another 2 large...
And here we go with the ratings thing again. We get it. Somehow ratings = correctness. But, it doesn't really.
Can we not speak out about what is happening before our very eyes without fear of repercusion? There was the 1st amendment in this country at one time.
The First Amendment protects individuals from having their free speech rights infringed upon by the government.
It does not give people like Rush Limbaugh total freedom to say whatever they want without criticism!! How you can NOT know this and still attempt to educate US with your insights baffles us all!
And yeah, Rush should be denied the right to lie without being challenged about his lies. Anyone who lies should be challenged. I would wager that you wouldn't want someone on the left to be allowed to spew lies without any criticism, but when it's done to your sacred Rush, you pitch a fit.
In the NFL, you have PLAYERS who make or break the team. The PLAYERS can CHOOSE to work really hard for their team, and thereby give the owners a profit. The PLAYERS also get traded to other teams and some contracts have a clause where the PLAYER can decide if they want to go to the other team, or get traded to another team.
IF the PLAYERS won't play for St Louis and the PLAYERS won't allow themselves to be traded to St. Louis, WHAT NFL OWNER wants to face that possibility?
So in the interest of MONEY, the PLAYERS CHOOSE not play for ANY Limbo owned team and the OWNERS CHOOSE not to have a Limbo owned team!
You folks want to whine and moan about poor Limbo, the media and Liberals are sooo mean, but you FAIL to understand and ACCEPT that the NFL is about MONEY! And ANYTHING Limbo, does NOT sell in the NFL!
Limbo is allowed to say ANYTHING he desires and the NFL PLAYERS and their OWNERS are ALLOWED to tell Limbo that they don't want ANYTHING to do with Limbo!
THAT is FREEDOM!
Rush's 1st amendment rights have not been infringed upon at all, and neither have yours, and neither have mine. You forget that when you say things, words sometimes have consequences, and Rush is now learning that he is not immune to what he's said in the past.
What has been made up about Rush? Nothing. He's said those, and more horrible things in the past, and it's made him a lot of money. And fortunately, the NFL doesn't want any of it.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Tell me what part of the First Amendment applies to what is happening with Rush. He opened his racist mouth one too many times and his business partners, under pressure from other owners, coaches and players, pushed him out. Rush can say whatever he wants and so can the owners, coaches and players. His business partners can push him out. Rush's First Amendment rights are still intact.
it's amusing how the NFL only represents and stands for equality. just look at their hiring practices - obvious racism. what's also amusing is watch the political hacks in here (most of the comments in here) turned a blind eye on the moral relativism of their comments. it's sad to see how ideology has trumped common sense and define intellectual dishonesty.
If 4fiefdom and Ihasapez would perhaps exsercize their 1st amendment rights to be a little clearer in WTF their talking about...it would be greatly appreciated.
You're mad about the hiring practices of the NFL and the racism inherent in that, that's fine, there could be a point to be made there with how many black head coaches there have been over the years (not many).
But then you're also mad because another rich white guy isn't being allowed to buy something. Which point are you mad about? The racism in the NFL, or that another rich white guy isn't being allowed to spend his money on an NFL team?
What moral relativism are you talking about? Explain please. It's just funny (in an ironic way) of how Limbaugh's chickens are coming home to roost, and how people like you, and Limbaugh are crying victim about it. It's called personal responsibility. Limbaugh has to be responsible for the things that he's said over the years, and have been documented by this website, and others.
This has nothing to do with ideology, as much as you'd like to think it does. It's called the guys who are trying to buy the Rams didn't want to get tagged with the walking controversy that is Rush Limbaugh, as in, his money isn't needed or wanted in this case.
Selma broke the back of segregation. No one has ever denigrated its memory by calling it a riot.
You dem guys are really messed up. Why are you not concerned or commenting on important issues? Where are the topics that concern me as an American tax payor?
Instead you are fixated on radio personalities, I don't care who owns a small part of a football team. Lets get with the program, the change that Obamma promised. I don't see it getting better, the in party bickering is getting worse. I actually am glad for the discourse, as it is the right of all Americans to openly question the decisions made by the legislature, even within the Presidential office.
Oh yea, that's right, We as Americans think more about what Rush sayes or wants to buy, than our own personal interests, get real, quit making your own opinions, or your personal problems, out to be news. Rush is not news, he is a radio talk show host that expresses his own opinions. That is what he gets paid to do. The elected body does not get paid to comment on radio talk show host!
I am a Federalst, here, let me explain. Don't worry, let me get that for you....
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=federalist
blake_braesicke@netzero.net
If I start a conversation telling you you're really a jerk, how much of the rest of my spiel are you going to listen to?