About us Login Get email updates
Greg Lewis
Print

The Friday Rush: Following Limbaugh on his journey to the edge

November 13, 2009 8:15 pm ET

It's like Rush Limbaugh is actively trying to push himself to the margins of the country's political discourse. There's simply no better explanation than when he said this:

LIMBAUGH: But if we're going to ask, "Why did [Hasan] do it?" knowing full well that he's in the same mosque in 2001 with the radical preacher going nuts, we're going to also have to believe that the guy was just like Obama and didn't hear Reverend Wright's words when he was in his church.

You read/heard that right. Rush Limbaugh likened the president of the United States to a mass-murdering lunatic.

Usually when Limbaugh says something that outrageous, he kicks up a media frenzy and has a chorus of conservatives all making a similar point. For example, when he went through his little health-care-reform-is-like-Nazism phases, it was pretty much in line with what other conservatives were saying. His rhetoric in that case wasn't even in a league of its own. If you take a trip down memory lane to this past summer, you'll remember how it was a race to the bottom for conservatives when it came to criticizing health care reform.

But this week, Rush was alone in his extreme criticism of the president's handling of the Fort Hood shooting.

True, there was some criticism lobbed at President Obama from the right for his two-minute "shout-out" preceding his first public remarks about the shooting. And a lot of conservatives have hammered the press and Obama alike for their reluctance in labeling the tragedy an act of "terrorism."

However, outside of The Rush Limbaugh Show, it's hard to find much ire over how Obama handled the situation; and many conservative commentators who usually make no bones about their dislike for the president thought that Obama's speech at the Fort Hood memorial service hit the right notes.

"I think it was a very sober speech. It was respectful to the fallen, and he did have that reference that we saw to the element of jihadism in this attack," said Fox News "All Star" Charles Krauthammer on a recent broadcast of Special Report.

"A good speech with a superb ending," wrote conservative blogger Allahpundit.

But Rush reverted to kneejerk, angry partisanship, calling the speech "empty" and "meaningless" and using it as an opportunity to trash former President Bill Clinton. Granted, we're not predisposed to liking Rush, but it sounded gratuitous and grating.

On Friday's show, Rush doubled down on his weeklong efforts to paint himself into the fringiest part of the fringe conservative movement. For example, he tried to suggest that the trials of the 1993 World Trade Center bombers somehow led to the 9-11 terrorist attacks:

LIMBAUGH: There've been all kinds of people on television today being asked, but, wait, you're bringing them into New York, doesn't that make New York any -- a bigger terrorist target? Hey? And they all say, well, no, no, New York's always a terrorist target. Look at '93. We tried those guys in 1993 and nothing happened. What do you mean, nothing happened? You ever heard of 9-11? We tried these guys and convicted the Blind Sheikh in 1993 and nothing happened except 9-11.

On the upcoming criminal trials for 9-11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (KSM) and other Guantánamo detainees, Rush found himself at odds with a flotilla of actual conservative scholars. Rush declared Obama's decision to try KSM in the U.S. criminal justice system a "disgusting travesty." He later added that the trials were "being done to satisfy the rabid radical far left that hates this country, that hates George W. Bush, that hates the U.S. military."

But numerous prominent conservative scholars and statesmen disagree. Take for instance the "Bipartisan Declaration" by the Constitution Project, "Beyond Guantanamo," which states that "[c]ivilian federal courts are the proper forum for terrorism cases." And what kind of pinko-commie leftists would sign such a declaration? Just to name a few: Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist, former Rep. Thomas B. Evans Jr., a former co-chairman of the RNC, David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union and National Rifle Association board member, and former Reps. Bob Barr and Barry Goldwater Jr.

Limbaugh also spent the week pushing some pathetic falsehoods that failed to get any mainstream traction, even with a heavyweight like himself behind them. First, he ran with Jerome Corsi's flat-wrong scoop that Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan advised the Obama transition team. Nothing enhances your credibility like repeating a smear that was debunked from the start by Corsi himself.

Then, doing his best to buck up Politico's claim that RedState is an influential conservative blog, Rush ran with the website's false claim that the Obama administration was trying to purge Republicans from civil service positions. Unsurprisingly, the claim turned out to be completely baseless, and despite Limbaugh's best efforts, the smear never really garnered much attention outside the fringe blogs.

So we've established that Rush has begun to run contrary to prominent conservative thinkers on constitutional issues, that he's ineffective at pushing new smears into the mainstream, and as we addressed last week, he has shown impotence in helping to get conservative politicians elected. Could it be that all of these factors have contributed to Republicans no longer showing fear of him?

Last Friday, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) criticized Limbaugh's aforementioned Nazi rhetoric. Earlier in the year, that would have been cause for Rush to call Cantor out on the air. And following such public humiliation, Cantor would have issued some sort of apology to Maha Rushie and cowered away from the spotlight with his tail between his legs. We remember vividly the days when Limbaugh left a trail of Republicans in his wake begging for forgiveness. But that didn't happen this week. Cantor, a reliably conservative Republican, faced no repercussions from Rush, who even returned to the Nazi imagery during the week, but with no mention of Cantor or his remarks.

That he no longer crusades against the Republicans who dare speak out against him is telling, as is the fact that Cantor didn't feel the need to kiss Boss Limbaugh's ring in forgiveness. But, of course, that's what happens when you put yourself on the fringe -- people stop listening to you, and you stop listening to them.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 13, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
      2 5
      Reverend Wright advocated violence? Sure, some of his aired views seem to be somewhat radical to some, but to liken him to a imam preaching jhihad? Mr. Lewis, reads to me like you are projecting much as you accuse Lush Rumball of doing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (November 13, 2009 11:06 pm ET)
        7  
        Where does Mr Lewis say that Rev Wright advocated violence? Where did he liken him to an iman preaching jihad? I read this whole thing and never read that.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by joshuarauch (November 14, 2009 4:48 am ET)
          2  
          Looks like someone skimmed over the piece instead of actually reading it. Uh-oh!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (November 14, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
          1 6
          I suppose I read a little too much into Mr. Lewis's line following the opening Rumball clip. But his job is, much as Rumball, Shamity, Michael the Dolt, Eddie Haskell Beck, etal, is to use hyperbowl (Boener's gaff from a couple of days ago) to try to drive home a point and "kick up a frenzy" among his (Lewis's) followers. I don't think Rumball said that Obama was a lunatic, but was making the point that like the Islamowhacko KSM, he listened to a certain point of view for a number of years, so that it probably had an impact on that person's thinking (as it probably would with most of us),
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Prup (aka Jim Benton) (November 14, 2009 4:36 pm ET)
            3  
            There is little doubt that Wright had a few off the wall ideas, and some of his comments after he was put in the media spotlight were truly obnoxious -- which is why Obama disavowed him. (And since Obama was elected, several of his repulsively anti-Semitic statements can only be excused by pointing to his age -- if at all.)But overall, his teaching was pretty much mainstream -- even in the famous "God damn America" sermon this was merely a hyperbolic way of pointing out America's long history of racial injustice.

            In fact, Wright's history -- including his military service, his service as a cardio-pulmonary technician (who received commendation for his work from one person he worked for, President Lyndon Johnson), his history in the Church hardly mark him as a radical. And, afaik, no one has ever pointed to any statement of his which advocated or even suggested violence.

            And while tu quoque is a weak defence, a much better comparison would be to the likes of Jim Ammerman -- head of an organization which approves chaplains for our military. (For more on him, go here, regrettably I can't copy any directly, but be sure to read the quotes from his "Prophecy Hour" speech. And, or course, we always have John Hagee -- whose endorsement was eagerly sought by the other principal candidate in the race, or his running mate's blessing by Thomas Muthee.

            In short, can we leave Wright in retirement and stop using him as a stick to beat the President, a stick used by many who would commend preachers much 'further out' than Wright was.


            Report Abuse
      • Author by pootersox (November 13, 2009 11:36 pm ET)
           
        Reading comprehension FTW.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rockfish (November 14, 2009 10:52 am ET)
        1 3
        The reverend did,in fact ,call for violent protest.His rhetoric was tasteless enough for him to be pushed under the bus,and deservedly so.Your viewpoints arwe obviously race driven,or you did not hear exactly was extolled by the bigoted Wright.Jihadists are arabic racists and nothing less.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Marge (November 14, 2009 4:41 am ET)
      7  
      I normally do not wish any one harm. But I certainly wish Rush would really go over the edge and then maybe they can get him the medicine he really needs not the oxy pills he loves.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bewildered (November 14, 2009 11:18 am ET)
        7  
        Hasn't he gone over the edge already? How could we possibly expect any of his hatred and hyperbole to escalate any further?? I already believe it is as bad as it can get.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jim359 (November 15, 2009 1:06 am ET)
          6  
          Narcissitic people like Rush tend to be self destructive types. Sooner or later he will say something that will get him yanked off the air. He is still decending into madness and hasn't hit the bottom yet.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Cheney2012 (November 16, 2009 12:42 am ET)
            1 6
            Exaclty WHO will yank Rush off the air?

            Rush OWNS his show. He's not some DJ in Wichita who gets 'yanked' off the air.

            Ignorance is bliss!
            Report Abuse
    • Author by ptluzzi (November 14, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
      6  
      Rush is nothing more than a failed dj that found his nich with the righ wing nutjobs and says things to get ratings the nutty the better. he is as fake as a 3$ BILL
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (November 15, 2009 8:18 am ET)
      1  
      i suspect mr. limbaugh will be crying, all the way to the bank, with his what, 80 million from clear channel. would that i could suffer that kind of ignominy.

      it'd be tough, but i would reach deep within myself (and my bank account), and dig up the will to carry on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (November 16, 2009 12:39 am ET)
      1 3
      So this week we're back to how Rush Limabugh doesn't matter. Yup..OK..got it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cannonball (November 16, 2009 9:16 am ET)
      2 1
      I have to take this opportunity to bash Obama. The trials in NY target only the cases the administration thinks it can win. They deny such basic fair trial rights to the rest of the GB prisoners by opting to either try them in military trials, with limited civil rights or no trials with continued indefinite detention. This is cherry picking for show trials and is dishonest, unfair and a slippery-slope to further deterioration of all of our constitutional rights. Obama is failing his promise to close the Bay and try the prisoners in U.S. courts.

      I fear terrorism when I travel overseas where U.S. intelligence is less effective, although they have done a great job. I have no fear on U.S. soil, just like I do not fear mass murderers appearing before me to kill indiscriminately. It's not that neither of these things may happen to me, it's that I am not going to let that remote possibility chnage my life. All of America should feel the same way. We must protect our civil rights and those of our criminals, lest we be charged as criminals and denied a defense. We chose to arrest supposed civilian terrorists and move them to U.S. soil. If we didn't want to extend to them internationally supported rights, we should have shot them dead on foriegn soil. After all, such mindless killing seems to be business as usual based on the level of civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      Obama has broken most of the anti-war promises that caused me to vote for him over Hillary Clinton. I thought she was too hawkish. But now, Obama is the new Bush (or should I day Cheney). Who will I vote for next time? Where are the true Americans that are willing to take office and steer us back on track even if it means losing the next election?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by emailpr (November 16, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
        3  
        you were right to vote for Obama.. but Obama, being a true diplomat is weighing all options carefully before making a decision.. unlike Bush who dragged us thru the gutter for 8 years.

        I still believe obama is anti-war.. but it'll take some time to clean up the mess created by Bush..

        rest assured.. obama will deliver what he promised.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by myrmidon (November 16, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
      1 6
      Impotence?

      Let's talk impotence. None, not one of the state governors supported by Pres. Obama and the Democrats was (re)elected in this year's gubernatorial elections. That's in spite of Obama's having actively campaigned for them.

      That has to hurt. Fact check it if you don't believe me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (November 16, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
        5  
        Doesn't take long, there were only two of them. They were both very weak candidates, and would have had trouble winning if George Washington had campaigned for them. It doesn't help Obama, but I don't think it tells us too much about where he stands, either way.
        Report Abuse