About us Login Get email updates
Jamison Foser
Print

The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about

November 25, 2009 7:09 pm ET

If you like what Rupert Murdoch, the right-wing billionaire behind Fox News and the New York Post, has done for the national discourse, you'll love what Philip Anschutz is trying to do in your hometown.

Anschutz built his fortune -- his $8 billion net worth is good for 36th place on the Forbes 400, ahead of better-known Murdoch and Steve Jobs -- in the oil and gas industry, augmented with railroad and telecommunications holdings, as well as Regal Cinemas and the production company behind The Chronicles of Narnia films.

The far-right American Spectator describes Anschutz as "a committed conservative" who "gives lots of money to the Republican National Committee and to GOP candidates" and is "friendly with fellow oilman George W. Bush."

In 2005, Media Matters detailed Anschutz's history of conservative activism:

Anschutz has a history of supporting socially conservative causes. According to a recent Post article, Anschutz's family foundation gave James Dobson, the founder of the conservative Christian organization Focus on the Family, an award for his "contributions to the American Family." The Post noted that according to the foundation's website, Focus on the Family works to "counter the media-saturating message that homosexuality is inborn and unchangeable" and that one of the group's policy experts referred to abortion as an example of when "Satan temporarily succeeds in destroying God's creation." Further, as the Post mentioned, Anschutz contributed $10,000 in 1992 to Colorado Family Values in support of the group's efforts to pass a state constitutional amendment to invalidate state and local laws that prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation. (The referendum passed, but the United States Supreme Court struck it down as unconstitutional.) According to the Post, "Anschutz's money helped pay for an ad campaign that said such anti-bias laws gave gays and lesbians 'special rights.'"

In May 2003, the Orange County Weekly reported that other Anschutz Foundation beneficiaries include the Institute for American Values, which according to the Weekly "campaigns against single parenting," and Enough is Enough, which "promotes Internet censorship." The San Francisco Chronicle noted on February 20, 2004, that Anschutz also funds Morality in Media. As Media Matters previously noted, the Institute for American Values also receives funding from the conservative Bradley and Scaife foundations, as well as grants from the John M. Olin Foundation, another major financer of conservative organizations. Enough is Enough and Morality in Media have also received funding from the conservative Castle Rock Foundation.

In recent years, Anschutz has turned his attention to his media holdings, including his movie production company. And he is building a news-media empire, as well: he bought the San Francisco Examiner in 2004 and launched the Washington Examiner the next year, while trademarking the "Examiner" name in more than 60 cities. And earlier this year, Anschutz purchased The Weekly Standard from Murdoch.

Anschutz and the people in his employ are quick to counter suggestions that his right-wing politics drive editorial decisions at his newspapers. A 2007 profile of Anschutz in American Journalism Review included a Washington Examiner editor stressing that Anshutz had told him "All I want to do is put out quality newspapers." A 2004 Washington Post article quoted another Anschutz employee stressing that Anschutz had "taken no hand in the operations, nor in demanding any particular editorial policy."

But Anschutz's publications certainly do reflect his conservative views.

Earlier this year, Media Matters' Terry Krepel detailed the right-wing tilt to the Washington Examiner's staff, including alums of the National Review, The Washington Times, NewsBusters, Robert Novak's newsletter, the American Enterprise Institute, and the Heritage Foundation.

And those kinds of staffing decisions lead to headlines like these, all featured on the front of the Washington Examiner's web page Wednesday afternoon:  

  • Are Democrats exiting the sinking ship?
  • Inside the numbers: How Obama has fallen
  • Global warming industry becomes too big to fail
  • Youngest voters spurn Obamacare
  • Damn the deficit: Full speed ahead on health care

Then there's the Opinion section, which features such gems as:

  • Gene Healy: Obamacare is unconstitutional
  • Grace-Marie Turner: Ten reasons public won't buy Senate health care plan
  • Dr. David Gratzer: Medicine isn't perfect, Obamacare is even less perfect
  • Ken Blackwell: Obama's indecision is hurting foreign alliances

If Anschutz's right-wing politics were shaping only the Washington Examiner, it might not matter much. Washington has plenty of conservative media; how much damage can one more do -- particularly given that The Washington Times (another newspaper controlled by a right-wing billionaire) is in danger of imploding?

But remember: Anschutz trademarked the "Examiner" name in more than 60 other cities. And he is making a push into the "hyper-local" news market with his Examiner.com sites.

Anschutz launched Examiner.com about a year and a half ago as an Internet-only local news portal; it currently reaches 129 markets and its traffic ranks 21st among U.S. news sites -- with the fastest traffic growth of any site from August of 2008 to August of 2009. And just a few weeks ago, Examiner.com bought NowPublic, a Canadian citizen-journalism site with reporters in more than 140 countries. The New York Times reported at the time:

With the sale, Examiner.com, a unit of Mr. Anschutz's Clarity Digital Group, became the latest company to show interest in a lively corner of the Web: the tools that let people read and share the news around them, sometimes down to neighborhood blocks.

[...]

Rick Blair, the chief executive of Examiner.com, said in an interview that his company's expansion into more than 100 markets indicated that hyperlocal information could be a scalable and sustainable business. Whether it can be profitable is still to be determined. "We're trying many ways to determine the advertiser interest," he said.

Given the newspaper industry's struggles, it isn't inconceivable that Examiner.com could quickly become a key source of news and information for many Americans. At which point, based on Anschutz's history, it'll be like having a local version of Fox News Channel in every city in America.

Jamison Foser is a Senior Fellow at Media Matters for America, a progressive media watchdog and research and information center based in Washington, D.C. Foser also contributes to County Fair, a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web, as well as original commentary. You can follow him on Twitter and Facebook or sign up to receive his columns by email.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 25, 2009 7:46 pm ET)
      6 31
      Oh, the horror of having an opposing opinion and expressing it in the media! The horror, I say.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by madamswe (November 25, 2009 8:15 pm ET)
        2 1
        Except, as MMFA has repeatedly documented, Fox News is rarely just an opposing opinion. It's an opposing opinion based on lies, fabrications and truthiness. That's not helpful and the last thing an already riled populace needs is a local voice echoing the hateful rhetoric they get on cable.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (November 25, 2009 11:41 pm ET)
        30 6
        What opposing opinion?

        All we have in America is right wing corporate media and far right wing corporate media.
        ~
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (November 26, 2009 12:27 am ET)
        17 2
        Of course Oscar knows that what he suggests is our problem with this guy is NOT what our problem with this guy is.

        The reason we worry about the nonsense coming from the rightwing media is because it's toxic to our national debate. Instead of talking about the issues we need to be talking about, instead we're forced to refute rightwing talking points that aren't based in reality. Instead of having a healthy debate, we end up fighting poisonous nonsense from bigots and racists who have a nationwide forum from which to spew that nonsense, and they have legitimacy they don't deserve based upon their previous behaviors, words and deeds.

        MMFA has to fight against this kind of stuff getting the credibility it doesn't deserve, because as long as it has that undeserved credibility, it steals time and attention away from the real things we should be talking about.

        Oscar, I've looked at the archived posts here a couple of times doing research, and I've seen your name for years. You know better than this. You know that this isn't about opposing viewpoints at all. Did you get a promise of a bigger Christmas bonus if you'd throw out this totally invalid talking point before you left for the holiday weekend? I can't imagine any valid reason for your doing so. You should be thoroughly ashamed. I fear you're not.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Samurai Cowboy (November 27, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
          3 2
          Oscar is probably one of the vast legion of hacks and lackies that are on the payroll of the Republican National Committee. We have a Black republican here is St. Louis by the name of Z. Dwight Billngsley who spouts RNC propaganda once a month in his "commentary" column in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mescal (November 28, 2009 1:21 am ET)
            3 4
            Oscar has been posting here for years. He may be a conservative, but he is anything but a troll. There's a number of posters here that do merit your charge, SC, but Oscar is not one of them. He may revel in yanking our chains on occasion, but has often demonstrated himself to be intelligent and thoughtful.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by cokids (November 28, 2009 10:44 am ET)
          1  
          Someone says, "MMFA has to fight against this kind of stuff getting the credibility it doesn't deserve, because as long as it has that undeserved credibility, it steals time and attention away from the real things we should be talking about."

          Yup, Paris Hilton is famous because she is such an attractive subject that so many Americans find irresistable! Feed us Pablum like this and where is the time for news...even fake news?

          Heck! We're willing for our Congresspeople to be 'bought and paid for;' why not the news too? Taxation without representation is back...BIG time!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by trelan1701 (November 26, 2009 1:59 am ET)
           
        I'm sorry, did you just it's OK to have an opposing opinion in the media? As in the news? As in putting a spin on reporting? As in "the MSM is liberal!"? As in bot being "fair and balanced"?

        Is that what you're suggesting is OK?

        Please don't be stupid enough to claim "I said 'media' not 'news'" The article is referring SPECIFICALLY to news.

        So, if a media outlet is supposedly "liberal" by dint of NOT being right-wing it's bad, horrible and a threat to America!

        But if it's conservative by dint of being, I dunno, CONSERVATIVE, it's totally OK?

        Are you this hypocritical in real life as well? How...pathetic.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 26, 2009 9:43 am ET)
        11 1
        Having an opinion and expressing it in the media is a good thing. That's what keeps us free and informed.

        But an almost complete takeover of the media by conservative propagandists will lead to disaster for most Americans.

        I think opinion shows are important, if the opinion is explained and understandable by viewers. Opinions, not claims of socialism, fascism, etc.

        Today we have one "news" network which exists for the sole purpose of destroying a presidency.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by vwcat (November 26, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
        11 2
        there is no opposing opinion. We have mainstream and we have conservative, which the mainstream parrots all the time rather then fact checking or doing any critical thinking.
        The whole liberal media is falasy born about 40 years ago from the pen of Pat Buchanan and given to Agnew to spout.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (November 26, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
        11 1
        But it is not presented as an "opinion". It is presented as "straight news". Just read the quotes in the the story above from Anschutz.

        The only way that you & your perverted right-wing ideology can be taken seriously is to FAKE actual news sources in this way.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (November 27, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
        5 1
        As you no doubt know from anti Soros rants the point is how much should one rich dude control the conversation for everyone else?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (November 27, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
          4  
          Bingo. I don't want ANY one person controlling vast cross sections of the media, be it Soros or any other tycoon.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Daninhamden8165 (November 28, 2009 5:51 am ET)
        1  
        This nations number one problem is our media.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by JoeCollins (November 26, 2009 3:33 am ET)
      1  
      Damn, that free speech stuff is so annoying.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (November 26, 2009 4:55 am ET)
      14 1
      this is, yet another, example of the growing right wing press, and it's influence. it's influence is evident in the headlines of other major publications. deficits is a good example. we didn't hear about deficits during the bush years. nothing. it's as if bush didn't inherit a surplus, and didn't leave with a deficit. another example is supposed "indecision" on afghanistan. for years, the press has referred to the war in afghanistan as the "forgotten" war. it was forgotten, in a major part, due to the media's disregard. there was no afghanistan plan for, arguably, 7 to 8 years under bush. however, obama taking 2 months, to weigh all options, is tantamount to betraying our troops. in following the lead of the right wing press, the entire american media is becoming more hostile to obama, and becoming more supportive of the tea bag movement, especially in coverage. no other protests garner as much press attention.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jshipley53615 (November 26, 2009 11:17 am ET)
        1  
        You're stating facts "Blue". Lemmings like tbone are not capable of processing anything that doesn't come out of some rightwing BS artists mouth.
        He probably still believes there is actually a "Liberal Media".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by vwcat (November 26, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
        14 1
        that is why the impression is left with the public in general that all of the deficit is Obama's doing.
        Notice how no one says a word about Bush and Tarp or bailouts. It is all Obama
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Tbone Slickens (November 26, 2009 7:18 am ET)
      3 18
      Regal Cinemas and the production company behind The Chronicles of Narnia films.


      OH THE HORROR! He was behind a kids movie! The VAST Right Wing conspiracy is starting to creep into your children's minds! Is there any place safe? I mean, every child should be forced to watch An Inconvenient Truth and Saw IV movies till their precious little eyes glaze over.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jshipley53615 (November 26, 2009 11:12 am ET)
        1  
        I think your brains' glazed over, lemming.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by chimpevil (November 26, 2009 11:42 am ET)
        14 3
        It's not even a conspiracy anymore--it's been out in the open, well-financed and upfront in its intentions, for many years now. As to its affect on children's minds, the idiocy of your comments illustrates just how toxic this ideology can be to tiny, underdeveloped brains.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 27, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
        6 1
        That's all you and Oscar can bring? Petty platitudes?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rsinebada7366 (November 26, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
      3  
      C'mon, Gang, we all know what we need. Readers, citizens, with common sense and intelligence plus an unwillingness to accept or pass along lies and propaganda. Until we develop that in ourselves, it won't matter what the $$$$$ grabbing media does.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RealTruthseeker (November 26, 2009 4:30 pm ET)
      8 2
      I suspect just as Faux and other online elements such as NewsMax, and publishing houses such as Penguin... Mr. Anschutz has a very good chance of making this network of local enterprises profitable.

      There's a tremendous profitability in taking gullible conservatives money by telling them what they want to hear... while condemning the rest of media as "liberal biased". No question, it's a profitable racket... exploited really first by Fatboy Limbaugh and regurgitated by the others.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by coldteablues19577325 (November 27, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
        5 2
        "There's a tremendous profitability in taking gullible conservatives money by telling them what they want to hear... while condemning the rest of media as "liberal biased". No question, it's a profitable racket... exploited really first by Fatboy Limbaugh and regurgitated by the others."

        And with no apparent guilt or shame in doing so. This is what so sickens me by the whole thing. I don't know which is worse ... the brazeness of such people or the ignorance/stupidity of the fearful conservative folk who fall for this crap at every turn.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (November 27, 2009 10:21 am ET)
      7 1
      He sounds like a bizarro world version of Citizen Kane.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (November 27, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
      4 2
      I knew when I saw Laura Ingraham,I was looking at the Ice Queen of Narnia.Now I know it was no accident that I saw what I saw.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 28, 2009 10:30 am ET)
      3 5
      On Nov 25, MMFA posted the Beck "America is not fearful........" (Paraphrased) under their mission statement of posting conservative misinformation. So, I assumed MMFA's staff is not fearful, but then here they post "........you should worry about." While there is a slight difference between worry and fear, I felt it somewhat ironic that MMFA would post so soon after the Beck thread. A slow newsday perhaps?
      An opposing opinion. Surely MMFA would prefer that all print use only opinion pieces by the likes of Clarence Page, Ellen Goodman, Garrison Keller, etal and all cable news/opinion shows would offer only the opinions of the likes of Mr. Ed, Oldermann, Maddow, etal. So a right wing opinion is an opposing opinion to the MMFAs, Daily KOS, etal of the internet world.
      Have a wonderful last of the "Holi" day weekend.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by time to fight back (November 28, 2009 11:32 am ET)
      4 1
      Here is a guy who is a holocaust denier, has done secret billion- dollardeals with Iran and Chavez and has secretly given money to Hamas and the PLO and this guy owns newspapers?
      Report Abuse