The end of the Wash. Times and Rev. Moon's right-wing charity
You'd think that somebody with a direct line to the Almighty, and tapped by Jesus to save mankind on Earth, would be able to come up with a better business plan for running a daily newspaper. But, alas, after nearly three decades of unrelenting financial losses, the Rev. Sun Myung Moon, a federal tax cheat, accused cult leader, and founder of the Unification Church, has decided to pull out. Actually, according to news reports, it's more like Moon's U.S. college-educated sons, as part of an internal family power struggle, have decided to finally cut off the endless stream of Asian church cash that's kept The Washington Times afloat.
With the announcement that 40 percent of the Times' staff is getting pink-slipped, and that the daily's no longer even going to bother with traditional who/what/where/when/why reporting, instead publishing an opinion-heavy publication that will be free of charge at a diminished number of local outlets, Times owners look like they're angling to be a Weekly Standard wannabe, churning out lots of predictable GOP Noise Machine opinion prattle. (Paging Andrew Breitbart!) What is clear is that the daily's days as a functioning newspaper are now over.
R.I.P. The Washington Times.
At this time of reflection, it's worth pondering two rather astonishing facets about the Times and its bizarre life and looming death. The first is the deep irony of how the Times, a clarion voice of partisan right-wing values, was run as a charity for nearly three decades and whose business model made a mockery of the free-marketplace system supposedly cherished by conservatives. The second is the even deeper irony of how the Times was owned by a delusional prophet whose apocalyptic visions made an even bigger mockery of the Christian values supposedly cherished by conservative activists.
Indeed, the woeful Times has for decades stood at the center of a Beltway marriage-of-convenience for the ages, as conservatives nearly developed cataracts turning a collective blind eye to the glaringly obvious contradictions that Moon's worldview created with conservatives. (FYI, Moon proclaims to be more powerful than God, that Jesus was a failure, and that dictatorial rule is best. Hmm.....)
The failed Times venture was nonetheless a shining example of how conservative ideologues view journalism. To them, it's not a craft to be used for public good (or even to make money, as it turns out), but a tool to be used for mainly propaganda purposes. And specifically, in Moon's case, it was used to impress his friends back in Seoul, South Korea, and to inflate the influence of his Unification Church.
The messianic Moon, who has referred to himself as "humanity's Savior," never cared about journalism in the traditional, American, free-marketplace sense of the word. Yes, he launched a product that looked like a newspaper, but its central goal was never really to inform its readers. Its goal seemed more often to misinform and to enhance Moon's reputation outside the United States. Moon and Unification Church leaders used the newspaper as a symbol, most often in Asia, to suggest that Moon moved freely among world leaders. That the newspaper in 2009 had a modest circulation roughly matching that of the Chattanooga Times Free Press was irrelevant to the paper's publishers, although the newspaper's evaporating readership probably was not lost on the Times' shrinking band of local advertisers.
Now, I'm not a press hater. And unlike conservative media critics, I don't take pleasure in watching news orgs struggle financially. I don't relish a world with fewer hard-working journalists. (I think democracies are best served with more journalists.) But I am hard-pressed to think of one thing that will be missed about the Times.
Indeed, the problem most recently wasn't that the Times was a Moonie newspaper, per se; it was that the Times became a chronically dishonest, and often proudly hateful, one. Indeed, the Moonie connection over time became largely irrelevant, in part because the Unification Church today barely even exists as a religious entity in America. (Experts suggest the movement boasts less than 5,000 members nationwide.)
The real problem, and the real damage the daily was doing to public discourse, was that the Times, like the rest of the right-wing movement post-Obama Inauguration Day, ran off the rails in 2009. And much like Fox News, it cut whatever ceremonial newsroom ties it still had with actual journalism.
I'm tempted to call the Times a failed news experiment. But it seems obvious that Moon knew it was going to fail financially, so it wasn't really an experiment. In other words, Moon may be the only big-city publisher in American history who set out to launch a money-losing newspaper; the only big-city American publisher who honestly did not care, nor did he ever expect, his newspaper to turn a profit -- or even come close.
Moon and the Times' parent company never open their books, but it's been estimated the self-proclaimed messiah has spent nearly $3 billion propping up the right-wing daily since its inception in 1982. As the paper now implodes, Moon is certainly the proud owner of the most expensive failed newspaper in the world, and it's possible that the Times stands as the most expensive failed American news property. Ever.
The irony, of course, is that the American conservative movement proudly -- and loudly -- worships at the altar of the marketplace. (No handouts!) And specifically when it comes to the media marketplace, the movement insists newspapers can no longer sustain themselves, in part, because they're so liberal that they've lost touch with news consumers, and that's why subscribers are abandoning the dailies. And that's why the dailies deserve to fail.
But oops, The Washington Times (not to mention the right-wing New York Post) has been losing subscribers by the tens-of-thousands in recent years, and if ever left strictly to the beloved marketplace, the Times would have been shuttered years ago for the simple reason that (surprise!) there is no mass market demand for the often shoddy right-wing product.
As a for-profit business, The Washington Times could never sustain itself. Period. So instead, its right-wing ideologue owner supported the daily as a form of conservative welfare -- as a charity. The Times was run for decades as sort of right-wing workfare project as Moon created hundreds of unneeded newsroom jobs, paid for in the name of giving its owner a (money-losing) media platform.
Of course the other glaring disconnect (or blatant hypocrisy, if you prefer) was the way the strongly Evangelical-flavored conservative movement embraced a free-spending media baron who, thanks to his own fantastic claims of divinity and looming world domination, made a mockery out of Christian traditions.
Behold:
I am God's ambassador, sent to earth with his full authority. I am sent to accomplish his command to save the world's six billion people, restoring them to heaven with the original goodness in which they were created. The five great saints and many other leaders in the spirit world, including even Communist leaders such as Marx and Lenin, who committed all manner of barbarity and murders on earth, and dictators such as Hitler and Stalin, have found strength in my teachings, mended their ways, and been reborn as new persons.
For those who might not know, the Korean-born Moon claims that at the age of 16, Jesus appeared to him in the mountains, on an Easter Sunday, and told him he'd been selected by God to accomplish the mission Jesus himself was unable to complete before he was crucified. Moon's task as God's new Messiah was to create "an "automatic theocracy to rule the world." (aka the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth.)
Yikes.
And as former Unification Church official Michael Warder once told The New Republic, "Within the Moon movement, there is no foundation for the ideas of freedom, the rule of law and the dignity of the individual as they are understood in the West."
Double yikes.
Recall that a 1978 congressional investigation reported "reliable information" tying Moon's church to the Korean Central Intelligence Agency.
Triple yikes.
And don't forget that Moon was convicted of falsifying records in order to avoid paying income taxes.
Quadruple yikes.
And this: Moon claims to have communicated with God, Jesus, Buddha, and Mohammed. Moon also claims to have freed Adolf Hitler from hell, and that 36 former U.S. presidents have all endorsed him from beyond the grave.
What that kind of brazen nuttiness ever had to do with conservative values remains a mystery. But the Moonie checks were cashed all over town as Beltway conservative activists embraced Moon and his largesse, which for decades poured into right-wing think tanks. It paid for elaborate anti-communism conferences; it lined the pockets of high-profile guest speakers; and of course sustained a newspaper that could not otherwise sustain itself.
It kept alive a newspaper that utterly failed in the marketplace.
And no, I can't say I'm going to miss The Washington Times.





















And all these years The Washington Times has been a charity operation!
Who will The Sludge Retort source now? What will NewsBusters do to back up its wild claims of media bias?
These is, indeed, the End Times. Or, at least, the End of The Times...
Meanwhile, the Washington Examiner will take up any slight conservative slack left by the Times' demise.
Didn't Bush have the reverend on speed dial when he was in office? All that bigoted bottled rage!
Oh, and RSJ, Murdoch still lets Ailes keep Beck on the air. Trust me, he's that crazy.
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/3/28/132117/162
One can not help but be concerned about the next step these believers make. One thing is certain, they are not going to go quietly into the good night.
Moon was convicted on all counts in 1982, and the convictions were upheld on appeal. He was represented in the appeal by Laurence Tribe, one of the foremost constitutional law experts and Supreme Court practitioners in the nation. Moon was given an 18-month sentence and a $15,000 fine. He served 13 months of the sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury and because of good behavior was released to a halfway house before returning home. While serving his sentence he worked in the prison kitchen.
If one reads the comments, the fun irony here is that Media Matters, or maybe just Boehlert and his followers are the spitting image in left-wing garb of the very folk this group labors to diminish and mock.
There is no maturity or complexity of thought in Boehlert or any of the commenters here, making both this article and the commenters an exact imitation of charicature you've invented as Times readers!
BTW, you do know that neither conservatism nor liberalism is, in and of themselves, bad. To use the term "left" as a pejorative shows exactly how uninformed you are and how, most likely, non-conservative you really are. Carry on and enjoy posting here; though, with your pre-conceived and incorrect attitude, I can't see why you would even want to do so. :)
Instead, I shall suggest said personage deserves a symbol of public odium.
Insufficient alliteration to impress Safire.
Washington Times to read from every day. When criticized Brian Lamb defended it's use as "balance" with the Wahington Post and NY Times. Their columnists and "reporters" were treated as mainstream press. I for one am glad to see them go, they were a very nasty bunch.
The Times, along with many other "news" sources decided to take the reality-TV approach to the news and rely on attracting readers by taking extreme and sensational positions (Elvis Lives!!!!)
The problem has been that they (along with many other mainstream news sources) are constrained from going the full National Enquirer route and just printing outright nonsense, by their traditions. The same is happening with Cable News.
Because these types of journalistic sources cannot just go completely crazy because they are trying to preserve their tradition of "news integrity", they are caught in the middle ground of trying to be a gossip magazine but at the same time pretending to be a newspaper.
The business model for being crazy is there (just watch Glenn Beck), but you can't just go half way. The alternative would seem to be doing real news and trying to create a business model that relies on readers trusting you as a source for accurate and unbiased information (who better to advertise with if you want to sell consumers on a good product).
The moral of the Times failure is to either go all in on the crazy pot and turn yourself into a paper-copy of Glenn Beck or move in the other direction and become a real newspaper. Trying to hold the middle ground has killed the Times and will likely kill a number of other newspaper and cable T.V. entities.
Most of Boehlert's criticisms are well-founded. However, he writes "But I am hard-pressed to think of one thing that will be missed about the Times." What will be missed is the conservative view of the news.
While I might have ethical issues with the way the news is reported at TWT I never had a problem with TWT's openly conservative stance. Journalistic objectivity is a myth, after all. I don't think I need to elaborate on MMFA!
In Washington, DC, of all the cities in the world, there should be a conservative newspaper. There should be media outlets espousing all points of view. News that leans to the left or right does not have to be propaganda. What made TWT bad was not that it was conservative. What made it bad is that it was bad!
Thankfully, another publication has stepped into the role voided by TWT. That would be, of course, the Washington Post.
"I think it would be fun to run a newspaper."
"You're right. I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars next year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in . . . sixty years."
Have they found Reverend Moon's sled?
The words "Moon" and "Rightwing" are interchangeable in that sentence.
As far as the clear hypocrisy of rightwingers who abandoned their so-called "christian" beliefs in regards to Moon, the same hypocrisy was also true during Bush's failed administration. People who are actually Christian understand that when someone claims they are guided by Jesus as they commit malevolent acts (such as the Shock n' Awe campaign that murdered tens of thousands of innocent people, such as torturing and murdering innocent people, etc.), that person's actions are called BLASPHEMY. Yet, never once did rightwing "christians" condemn Bush when he made his outrageous and blasphemous proclamations. To the contrary, they openly supported him in their nutjob "christian" churches!