Thu, Apr 20, 2006 5:38pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Pulitzer-winner Schmidt falsely claimed Abramoff gave "a lot of money to Democrats"

Summary: On C-SPAN's Q&A, Washington Post staff writer Susan Schmidt -- one of three Post reporters to be awarded a 2006 Pulitzer Prize for investigating the influence-peddling schemes of Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff -- repeated the false claim that Abramoff gave "a lot of money to Democrats." In fact, as Media Matters has noted repeatedly, no Democrats received contributions from Abramoff directly.

On an April 19 rebroadcast* of the January 15 edition of C-SPAN's Q&A, Washington Post staff writer Susan Schmidt -- one of three Post reporters to receive a 2006 Pulitzer Prize for investigating the influence-peddling schemes of Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff -- repeated the false claim that Abramoff gave "a lot of money to Democrats." In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted repeatedly, Democrats received contributions from Abramoff's clients and associates, but none from Abramoff directly.

From the April 19 edition of Q&A:

SCHMIDT: Well, that's, you know -- I think that some of the elected officials don't know how far this thing goes in their own parties, both Republican and Democrat. The Democrats have not been -- a few have been sort out there strident about it. But there's a deafening silence on the part of a lot of people, and that's because, actually, Abramoff had -- was giving a lot of money to Democrats, too.

Schmidt's own reporting does not support her assertion on Q&A. In a December 5, 2004, article, Schmidt reported that "some prominent Democrats, including former senator Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.), Sens. Harry M. Reid (Nev.) and Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.), were among beneficiaries of the largest campaign contributions from Abramoff's associates and clients." As Media Matters noted, Post ombudsman Deborah Howell, in her January 15 column, mischaracterized Schmidt's article, falsely claiming -- twice -- that Abramoff "had made substantial campaign contributions to both major parties." Post media writer Howard Kurtz later acknowledged that Howell's assertion was "inartfully worded" and could "have been more accurate." The Center for Responsive Politics' database of campaign contributions does not list any donations from Abramoff to any Democrats.

—S.S.M.

Comments (0)
 
Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.

Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.

Video Clip

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

 
Take Action!

Contact information:

The Washington Post
The Washington Post
The Washington Post
1150 15th St. NW
Washington, DC 20071

When contacting the media, please be polite and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and be sure to indicate exactly what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Issues / Media Tags Help
Issue:
Government and Elections
Sub-Issue:
Ethics
Topic:
Abramoff Scandal
Person:
Susan Schmidt
Network/Outlet:
The Washington Post
Personalized Alerts
Show Your Support
County Fair
Media Matters Action Center - Make a Difference!
RSS Feeds

Media Matters uses a taxonomy structure to help readers find information on various subjects. You can view all items by issue (the broadest category), view an issue's subissue, and even drill down to a particular topic. You can also look at items according to the related media personality, show/publication and network/publisher.

Social bookmarking sites allow you to save links to interesting items and share them with other users. Some, like Digg.com, also allow you to discuss these items and promote them to wider audiences by "digging" the ones that you like. To start using these services, simply register with the site in question.