Tue, Oct 12, 2004 2:47pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Distorting Duelfer: Limbaugh and O'Reilly misrepresented Duelfer report on Iraqi WMDs

On their respective radio programs, Rush Limbaugh and FOX News Channel host Bill O'Reilly misstated the findings of the comprehensive report by Charles A. Duelfer, special adviser to the director of Central Intelligence, on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. On the October 8 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show, Limbaugh falsely claimed: "Duelfer, in this report, said the elimination of [Saddam] Hussein was a good thing" and that "the action taken [in Iraq] was necessary." And discussing Duelfer's report on the October 8 broadcast of The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, O'Reilly falsely asserted that Hussein, in O'Reilly's words, "did not have weapons of mass destruction, but that they could have reconstituted those programs very, very quickly if they had wanted to."

While Limbaugh claimed that the Duelfer report defends President George W. Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq, it does not, in fact, take a stand on the issue. According to the report, "Readers will draw their own conclusions about various national and international actions and policies. This report will, hopefully, allow a more complete examination of these events by showing the dynamics involved within the Regime and where it was headed as well as the status of the WMD on the ground in 2003."

Although O'Reilly said Iraq's ability to quickly reconstitute its WMD programs is "not debatable," the Duelfer report refutes his claim. As the report notes, "Saddam aspired to develop a nuclear capability -- in an incremental fashion." Further, the Duelfer report notes that "Saddam wanted to recreate Iraq's WMD capability -- which was essentially destroyed in 1991 -- after sanctions were removed and Iraq's economy stabilized" and that Iraq "had no formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD after sanctions. Neither was there an identifiable group of WMD policy makers or planners separate from Saddam."

—A.S.

Comments (0)
 
Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.

Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.


Media Matters uses a taxonomy structure to help readers find information on various subjects. You can view all items by issue (the broadest category), view an issue's subissue, and even drill down to a particular topic. You can also look at items according to the related media personality, show/publication and network/publisher.

Social bookmarking sites allow you to save links to interesting items and share them with other users. Some, like Digg.com, also allow you to discuss these items and promote them to wider audiences by "digging" the ones that you like. To start using these services, simply register with the site in question.