Limbaugh, no holds barred: Sheehan "doesn't have the IQ of a pencil eraser"

On the September 26 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh attacked the motivations of Cindy Sheehan motivations in engaging in her anti-war activities, stating she is being "inculcated" and "manipulated." Limbaugh added that Sheehan "doesn't have the sense to come in out of the rain" and "doesn't have the IQ of a pencil eraser."
From the September 26 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:
LIMBAUGH: And, ah, they're easy prey, and Cindy Sheehan's a classic example. Cindy Sheehan doesn't have the sense to come in out of the rain. Cindy Sheehan doesn't have the IQ of a pencil eraser. She has been elevated as the front person for this group because she evokes sympathy. She is no more -- way of leading a movement than the neighborhood mouse that goes from house to house in your neighborhood looking for cheese is leading a movement. It's just -- it's just funny as it can be, but it's also sad at the same time because these are people who haven't amounted to diddly-squat, who desperately want to matter, and they are being led and inculcated, manipulated, and promoted in ways -- by people who actually do have an agenda -- actually do have an anti-American agenda.











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles



This was expected and unnecessary on either end. We know that Limbaugh's going to throw around this type of jargon and IMHO, I don't think Sheehan's that smart. Really, when I see this, Limbaugh's just trying to keep his track record going. It's a typical instance of name-calling. Just noise.
So stating opinions in a fairly outspoken fashion is enough to make a person a radical?
So stating opinions in a fairly outspoken fashion is enough to make a person a radical?
************************
As Ms. Sheehan has every right to her views and espouse them as she sees fit, so do those remarks have consequences and to many they are radical, yes. No different than Coulter's outrageous comments or anybody else's - freedom of speech to say it and freedom to criticize it.
Just because she is a grieving Mother does not insulate her from criticism.
So stating opinions in a fairly outspoken fashion is enough to make a person a radical?
- lostlogic
You're giving credit to Limbaugh that he doesn't deserve. Yes, I'm aware that he affects people's opinions in a not-so balanced manner, but face it, the guy, like O'Reilly, is a bag of air.
Then again, O'Reilly is quite outspoken. Heck, the man practically thinks he controls public policy. Maybe the same logic should be applied to his situation.
So stating opinions in a fairly outspoken fashion is enough to make a person a radical? - lostlogic
You're giving credit to Limbaugh that he doesn't deserve. Yes, I'm aware that he affects people's opinions in a not-so balanced manner, but face it, the guy, like O'Reilly, is a bag of air. Then again, O'Reilly is quite outspoken. Heck, the man practically thinks he controls public policy. Maybe the same logic should be applied to his situation. by mdprime
****
Not sure why you attributed this quote to me? I never wrote this.
Sorry about that. I see 'los...' and I assume it's you. Gotta work on that.
"[O'Reilly] practically thinks he controls public policy."
This statement is neither logical nor fact-based.
I don't know that I'd say Cindy Sheehan is nuts or as Limbaugh put's it, has the I.Q. of an pencil eraser.
I SUPPOSE one could look at her recent BEHAVIOR , taking on Hillary (declaring she'd better speak up about Iraq or she's out of a "job" )...or referring to McCain (who stupidly-IMO-met with her) as a warmonger.
Nuts? Or just getting TOO big for her britches? Burning bridges fast? Radical? I'm not really sure what to THINK of her.
I have sympathy for this woman and her loss...HOWEVER she SEEMS to be running amuck...I mean suggesting that OUR military was "occupying" New Orleans????
I'll give her CREDIT for revving up the Anti-War Movement....But I wonder IF it's time to reel her in, before she BECOMES a silly caricature of herself....
I think she has already become a caricature of herself. And when she makes lunatic comments for every person that cheers her on a half dozen tune her out. She has already passed the point of diminishing returns for the anti-war movement IMO, and is a liability now.
www.postmodernspectator.com
I'm actually going to agree with you here, Jeter. In the last couple of weeks it does seem as if she could benefit from a Rovian-type taskmaster to keep her "on-message." However, since she is not a politician, this is rather unlikely to happen. Rather, some (brave?) Democrat should step up to take the helm of the movement Sheehan has mobilized, to manage the public image, etc., leaving Sheehan to continue doing what she, thus far, has been very effective at doing, rallying the anti-war base.
The weird thing is that it doesn't seem to be aimed at ideology, off topic posts, cursing, rudness or anything else. It seems to be somewhat random. Almost 2/3 of the thread was deleted on the Intelligent Design thread the other day, and just about everyone got swept up in it. If someone is flagging these posts, does the moderator just automatically delete them? Don't they even look to see if the flag is valid?
The longer Cindy Sheehan remains outspoken, the lower Rush and the other bobble heads will go to smear her. I guess grade-school level insults are all he's got left.
"The longer Cindy Sheehan remains outspoken, the lower Rush and the other bobble heads will go to smear her. I guess grade-school level insults are all he's got left."
I'm not a fan of Limbaugh by any means, but I try to be fair to everyone on all sides, and that includes him, for better or for worse. The fact is, Limbaugh broadcasts for three hours a day--he probably said more about Sheehan than just the "grade-school level insult." To describe it as "all he's got" is an exercise in false bravado; you are trying to marginalize your opponant (Rush, in this case) by saying he's a burn-out, basically. Stick to the facts instead of self-congratulatory speculation.
You are correct, Rush has said alot more about her than just this. He has called her story "made up" by the media. He has said she is "not right". He has questioned her mental stability, and said she is being used by the left. I have listened to Rush some and read several of his comments here (yes, there are several here, just check the archives) and all are the same. He has complimented her very little and always with a personal insult or two thrown in after or and before so you know what he really thnks.
She is a dumb uneducated women. She hurts the antiwar cause. We needed people like her to stand up in March of 2003 not now. Rush is a jerk but he is right about her intelligence, just listen to her.
She is a dumb uneducated women. She hurts the antiwar cause. We needed people like her to stand up in March of 2003 not now. Rush is a jerk but he is right about her intelligence, just listen to her......by jlyon -
*******************************
Exactly. Sometimes nutty liberals and wacko conservatives are their own worst enemy.
"She is a dumb uneducated women. [sic]"
by jlyon -
-----
I have a feeling even uneducated people know the difference between "woman" and "women."
Sheehan is extremely articulate in expressing herself, and is not dumb at all. The fact that she speaks means she isn't "dumb," another word that even uneducated people should know.
"Sheehan is extremely articulate in expressing herself, and is not dumb at all." __________
You have no more proof than Limbaugh does. On a personal note, you are right: Sheehan is articulate in expressing her feelings. Like about how Bush is the "biggest terrorist in the world." Intelligent?
"The fact that she speaks means she isn't 'dumb,' another word that even uneducated people should know." ___________
No one ever said she was dumb because "she speaks" out against the war. You are creating a strawman.
- Sheehan is extremely articulate in expressing herself - easy to refute wingnuts ================================================================ Talking to a veteran's group in Aug.05 she called Pres.Bush a lying bastard, filth spewer, war monger, and an evil maniac.
Yep, she's articulate for the radical fringe.
What? Is one of those names inaccurate? Which one?
Rush is a pundit, not a rporter..what are we correcting here; That Cindy does know she is being manipulated by the 'world workers party"?
TO EVERYONE: Please learn the format of the MMFA website. Stories in the right column are examples of outrageous things said by the right, not inaccuracies.
The left column focuses on inaccurate reporting, which is why Coulter occasionally shows up in BOTH columns (like today)
If you use Rush's words to describe the dittoheads, they are right on target.
"...they are being led and inculcated, manipulated, and promoted in ways -- by people who actually do have an agenda -- actually do have an anti-American agenda."
Cindy Sheehan is an exploiter. She abandoned her son when he was very young. She eleft him to be raised by his father. Cindy Sheehan went on to activism in the Democratic party. When her son was killed in combat she exploited the situation, to further her agenda, and standing in the Democratic party. Cindy didn't care about her son, if she had why would she abandon him? So my question is how many readers out there heard this bit of information? Probably none of you, but that's the liberal media for you
Wow. I mean, wow, where do you get YOUR faux news?
[link to www.snopes.com]
Just so we're clear here, everything about Cindy abandoning her son and husband is labeled "False" on the Snopes site.
I haven't seen a source for any of this faux information. Where do these things start, anyway?
Who cares if Cindy Sheehan abandoned her son or not? It is irrelevant. What is relevant are the way-out-there comments she is making today.
I agree it's irrelevant. It's also, beyond that, untrue.
Just trying to clear up some confusion on some people's part. Probably a waste of bandwidth, but, oh well.
Tommy,
Bed46wizards did a good job correcting boynextdoor's blatantly false information. It was character assasination as well as a stab at the "liberal media" hoax. I am glad bed46wizards knocked it down. I hope you are too. Anytime we are fed misinformation from the left or the right, we should not poo-poo the person who debunks it. It should be congratulated.
I agree with you that Sheehan is a pretty dim bulb and her statements (even in context) are often rambling and odd. Her actual statements and actions can testify to her kookiness on their own, there should be no need to make things up as the lie boynextdoor has propogated.
Irrelevant or not, I hope we can agree on this.
"Who cares if Cindy Sheehan abandoned her son or not? It is irrelevant."
-----
Pointing out the lie is not irrelevant. Those here who continue to lie are not irrelevant.
When the GOP cannot refute a person's argument, they smear the person, almost always with lies. Such is the case here.
Cindy Sheehan has frequently outwitted the President of the United States. If it is true that she doesn't have the IQ of a pencil eraser, well, you do the math.
Cindy Sheehan has frequently outwitted the President of the United States.
****************************************8
I am sorry, even that is too rich for this site. "Outwitted" whom? I am afraid the only one's she has outwitted are her early on supporters who thought she was a rational and cogent anti War protester, instead of a nut.
"When the GOP cannot refute a person's argument, they smear the person, almost always with lies. Such is the case here."
______________
An opinion on Sheehan's intelligent, no matter how "disgusting" you may think it to be, is not a "lie." It is an opinion.
"Cindy Sheehan has frequently outwitted the President of the United States."
_______________
How? How has she outwitted the President? That is merely your opinion, just like Limbaugh's idea of Sheehan's IQ was his opinion. Thus, adhering to your standards, you are a liar.
"How? How has she outwitted the President? That is merely your opinion, just like Limbaugh's idea of Sheehan's IQ was his opinion. Thus, adhering to your standards, you are a liar." --kenkong77
--------------------------------------------------------
The "lie" I believe Easy was referring to was the poster boynextdoor's lie (i.e. that Cindy Sheehan did not raise Casey and that the media is covering it up.
It was indeed a lie. Your analogy does not make sense and I believe you misunderstood Easy's post.
kenkong77 - Thursday September 29, 2005 09:35:01 PM EST
You are factually incorrect. An IQ is a tangible measurement, it may not be quite as accurate in measuring intelligence as some would have us believe but it measures a tangible thing, therefore it is NOT simply an opinion about her, since a penicil eraser has no consiousness its IQ would obviously be zero, to say Sheehans IQ is the same is NOT an opinion it is an obvious LIE. Claim it is untrue all you want it wont make it so. You can say its an exaggeration or characterization or whatever you want literally it is a flat out untrue statement known at the time of its assertion to be false by the bloviator making the assertion, the very DEFINITION of a lie. Your appology for Limbaughs arrogant insult is factually incorrect as anyone with any sense whatsover could plainly see.
Why don't you share the source for your information so we can judge for ourselves? How do we know that you know what you are talking about otherwise?
Nevermind,
I see bed46wizards beat you to it. I am surprised the media hasn't covered it. Rove must have forgotten to forward it to them.
Did you get this from NewsMax or WorldNutDaily???
The politics of personal destruction at work.
Whoa! I just posted a response to a thread about the random deletions going on in this forum lately, and as I was typing it, the whole thread was deleted! How creepy is that? This forum is going down the tubes!
Read fast!
Just found this thread, and I have to say Nerzog, that's happened to me on a couple of occassions. My kids claim that it's tied in with the black helicopters and the mysterious sunglasses-wearing men who are lurking in the woods here... Spooky, eh? Come on censors - grow a sense of humor to accompany your ultra-twitchy delete-key finger!
Limbaugh refers to her as not being the "leader" of a movement. He doesn't get that she just represents a significant and growing sentiment in this country that will, hopefully, continue rise to the point where it helps sweep this corrupt, soulless corporatocracy out of office. She was a lightning rod at the right time. I'm sure the "radical anti-war fringe' will have many prominent figures step forward in the months and (hopefully not) years to come.
It's the ultimate in hypocrisy for this drug-addled morally bankrupt goon to criticize anyone.
rufus wrote: "It's the ultimate in hypocrisy for this drug-addled morally bankrupt goon to criticize anyone."
But apparently it is not hypocricy for you to criticize Limbaugh?
If it is not hypocritical of you, then why is it of him?
"rufus wrote: "It's the ultimate in hypocrisy for this drug-addled morally bankrupt goon to criticize anyone."
But apparently it is not hypocricy for you to criticize Limbaugh?
If it is not hypocritical of you, then why is it of him?" --anotheramerican
----------------------------------------------------
In order for your analogy to be complete, rufus t firefly would have to be a "drug addled morally bankrupt goon".
Don't you know he is the Leader of Freedonia?
He touts himself as America's truth detector!, America's anchorman!, a beacon of truth!, heard by millions daily. Pretty low standards, don't you think? My little character assesment is heard by you and maybe 26 other people and is based on his persistent personal attacks, ridicule and thinly-veiled contempt for any opposing view. I think comments like his are irresponsible and downright disgusting, regardless of political leanings. I know he's ONLY a pundit and these are his opinions, but I'm offended by the manner in which they are delivered. The hypocrisy lies in that his pompous, righteous indignation kind of falls flat when one considers his own moral shortcomings.
rufus,
I assume, since you said, "I think comments like his are irresponsible and downright disgusting, regardless of political leanings." that you also feel the same way about Al Franken, Randi Rhodes, etc.
Is that true?
Al Franken and Randy Rhodes said that Cindy Sheehan had the IQ of a pencil eraser? Really?
In re-reading your excerpt of my post, maybe "comments like THIS are irresponsible..." would have been a better way to say it. I won't follow you off topic regarding Franken and Rhodes. This is about Limbaugh.
Interesting that the rights Ms. Sheehan uses for free speach is also the same rights this blowhard uses every day. Rush is an idiot and belongs in jail for selling and using drugs.
"... these are people who haven't amounted to diddly-squat, who desperately want to matter." --Limbaugh
=================
If Sheehan didn't matter, Limbaugh wouldn't be talking about her. The fact that Limbaugh spends time pushing back shows that Sheehan and "these people" are having an effect.
If Sheehan didn't matter, Limbaugh wouldn't be talking about her. The fact that Limbaugh spends time pushing back shows that Sheehan and "these people" are having an effect.
***********************
Really? I said this earlier - Limbaugh loves Cindy Sheehan and wants her front and center as much as you do with Hannity and O'Reilly, Coulter and the like. It is delicious red meat and makes for such an easy target, it's amazing. The more Limbaugh can keep Sheehan "the face of the anti War left", the less he has to deal with clear thinking anti War people. Sheehan having an effect?, hardly - except for people to think she is more of a nut every day.
This is not too hard to figure out.
- Sheehan and "these people" are having an effect. - dave_chicago ================================================================
This from the NYT... "Armed men dressed as police officers burst into a primary school in a town south of Baghdad on Monday, rounded up five Shiite teachers and their driver, marched them to an empty classroom and killed them, a police official said."
The effect is that Sheehan has defined the radical fringe when she calls these cowardly bastards "freedom fighters".
I had a post removed from this thread, in which I commented on the supposedly Christian Limbaugh's name calling.
Why was it removed?
--same here...the most offensive thing i said was "fat drug addict". From what I've read, though, there have been alot of mysterious deletions from this line.
"the most offensive thing i said was 'fat drug addict.'"
___________
You dismiss your own comments and yet you would be criticizing those very same words in the harshest language if a conservative had said them.
I'm not helping here by keeping the mudfest going, but you're assuming that tralfaz would only attribute such language to conservatives. The discussion topic is Rush Limbaugh, who happens to be pro-conservative.
That does not change the fact that if a conservative had said the same thing, you and other "fair-minded" people would criticize it. Do not practice what you preach against.
What, pray, am I "preaching against"? I am laying my opinion down to this specific incident, while you rail on about people like myself blanketing conservatives as a cold-hard 'fact' - and of course, you don't back it up.
You assume that because I post here in rebuttal to your point that I must be a stereotypical left-wing liberal, which I find quite amusing. If you saw the very first post in this forum (from the sound of this, you didn't), I stated my belief that MMFA is wasting time writing articles on what I consider to be petty trifles.
Oh, and btw, thanks for the clarification surrounding the whole "fair-minded" issue. Your sarcasm demonstrates how you are so willing to denounce and dismiss. This should go without saying, but "I don't want to hear it" doesn't qualify as a defence.
--I'm sorry that using 3 words from the original post took off on its own; I was griping about the quick deletion of the entire discussion. To summarize, I did indeed call rush an unflattering name, and bemoaned the fact that someone so full of hatred seemed to be revered by Christians. A responder declared that I was exhibiting anti-Christian bigotry. I denied that, listed a few of JC's trademark sayings that seemed to be the reverse of rush's philosophy, and remarked that he did not seem to epitomize the New Testament Christian attributes. The response to this was to wonder whether I myself did, and as I was composing a retort asking what the hell that had to do with it, the whole thread was zapped. So, in my opinion, the ref here is something like a 1st grade school marm, and I don't want to play here anymore (well, one parting shot..i called rush a 'fat drug addict', a personal attack to be sure, but since such are his stock in trade, I figured he was hence fair game. And what is that cutesy little saying he uses, when someone accuses him of being too nasty/personal? Lets see, "stop whining!" and "get over it"). Over and Out.
If someone starts a thread with offending material (it is racist, for example), not only does that posting get removed, but all the postings that responded to it. So it could be that.
Hey, I had a comment on here re. nerzog's query about his comment that was wiped out. Mine was on for about 2 minutes and it's gone now. What gives???
whoa - weird - I just checked this again, and it's back - guess my computer is running on parallel universe time. Never mind... (Emily Luttila)
Instead of actually debating Sheehan, Rush's argument adds up to, "Oh, yeah? Well, you're stoopid!" I find myself wondering if he will follow up this deeply insightful argument with a coup de gras about Ms. Sheehan having cooties.
Irene
"Instead of actually debating Sheehan",
=================================================
What's to debate? The US "occupation" of New Orleans? Or the "little bit of wind" and "little bit of rain" called Rita stole her media coverage? Rush should know the whole IQ thing was wrong. Cindy speaks--pencil erasers don't. You can learn a lot from an eraser!
Again Shannon, we're talking about one woman who's been - unfortanetly, in the eyes of her opponents - in the limelight for the past 4-5 weeks, versus a talking head that's been throwing down his tilted viewpoint as the "voice of truth" for decades. Then consider the audiences that either reach. If Limbaugh's, Hannity's and Coulter's analyses are correct (in that the anti-war crowd is the minority), then why are we getting so riled up about it?
Another intelligent comment from the guy who kept getting fired from jobs until his father hired him; the same guy who endorsed the death penalty (Yes, he did!) for drug abusers, while he was strung out on a prescription pain killer; the same guy who endorses family values despite his having been married, what, only three times so far?
Well, there are pages more of this imbecile's hypocrisy and idiocy. And why isn't he down at the enlistment office where Cindy Sheehan's son went which led to his eventual death? Why, because HE'S ALSO GOT NO BALLS!
I'll see you on the street corner, Rush, you spoiled adolescent.
What's worse is that some people take this Untermensch seriously. God help them.
Sheehan, no holds barred: W. "biggest terrorist in the world."
__________
See, it can be applied to either side.
kenkong, you're new from the looks of it, and from the sound of it, lostlogic, solon or sagra has yet to have their way with your brief rebuttals.
As for Sheehan, she is not the head of the antiwar movement, but more of a symbol. She has been quoted as saying (and i might not have it word for word) on RealTime with Bill Maher:
"I couldn't stop what I've started even if I wanted to."
As to your response about terrorists, there are loads upon loads of arguments that can be thrown at your one-liner, so I'll simplify.
Who has nukes?
Who is the aggressor?
Who has more misled followers?
Who's scrambling to save face?
Cui bono? (Actually, this isn't a very good one, seeing as how both sides are benefiting in their own ways)
Really, there's one simple question that can be used in response to your jab.
Who's in power?
According to research IQ has a large genetic component... Is Rush also consciously or otherwise implying her offspring suffer from dimwittedness?
Maybe Cindy would gain a little more Rush style sanity if we JACKED UP HER OXYCONTIN DOSAGE.
Yeah, maybe Cindy isn't as smart as Rush, who got deferred from the military for having a pimple on his ass. These chickenhawks wouldn't be caught dead in a uniform.
Question Authority and see if it ATTACKS!
Part of Rush's job is to keep the base pumped up and angry. He does this very well. Yesterday, he reminded his listeners of all the investigations and indictments that the Clinton Administration had endured, then didmissed Delay's indictment as a political witch hunt. If Rush were half as smart as an eraser, he would have seen his own pathetic hypocrisy.
The folks who followed Ms. Sheehan in Washington last weekend were hardly radicaly anarchists. They were working people, college students, retirees, and clergy. Cindy has galvanized a large and growing anti-war movement. Limbaugh and his ilk are very threatend by that and they resort to the usual name calling and sliming. Regarding the "freedom figher" remarks - there is irony here. When Reagan's contra thugs were doing all sorts of bad things they were called "freedom fighters" and not a peep from Rush and the right wing.
Don't forget, there were also (was it Senate or House?) Representatives and Iraq veterans at the protest. So if we're calling them anti-American radicals, well, where does that leave you?
What is interesting to me about the pro-war faction is how they they personalize their campaign by attacking Cindy Sheehan. To them, it is all about her. Even in that pathetic 400 person pro-war protest in DC last week, many of the signs carried, the chants shouted and the quotes to the media were all about Cindy Sheehan. What a joke. If all you pro-war types are so certain of your position, let's hear your rational arguments how this disaster has made America safer without one reference to Cindy Sheehan. My guess is that among the MANY reasons the pro-war side is now a clear minority of the American people is that the public hears the same Cindy Sheehan bashing and is fed up with it.
The most effective antic that Ms. Sheehan could undertake in her anti War effort is to shut up. She is her, and the anti War people's, own worst enemy.
The longer she keeps herself in the public eye, the better off it is for the "pro War" crowd, as you put it.
Thanks for proving my point Tommy. The pro-war side can't defend their position without attacking Sheehan. That is apparently the only argument you've got.
randall,
I absolutely made your point - there isn't much to defend on the Iraq front these days, I have never maintained there was. But if Sheehan would stop inserting her nutty antics in the anti War movement it may gain more respectability - until then, it looks like a bunch of wackos, thanks to her.
Limbaugh is offensive and racist. He is particularly venomous towards those whom he (and the republican religious right) deem unsuitable. He uses epithets like "feminazis" for women who believe in a women's right to choose. He said that the torturers at Abu Ghraib were "just having a little fun." He markets a bright orange Club Gitmo tee shirts with "clever" sayings like "your tropical retreat from the stress of jihad." But there is alway outrage from Rush and his ilk when "liberal Hollywood" types indulge in a little satirical humor at the president's expense. Those who criticize the war are, according to Rush and his ilk, traitors of the worst degree. There is no room for dissent in Rush's universe. Notice that he does not engage in any debate with anyone from the other side; unlike Al Franken who is willing to go one on one with any right winger. Rush is a lying propagandist - that so many people hang on his every word is quite disturbing and does show many adults left behind.
Re Limbaugh & other pundits: Heck of a way to make a living, bearing false witness on a daily basis!
I'd like to say also to guys sitting on their behinds talking about and judging this women who has the balls to challenge this horrible invasion, to camp in a ditch for a month, to put her entire life on hold and be slandered and mis-represented: She outshines the whole lot of you.
Yes, she says some "radical" things. Perhaps some day her "radical" sayings will be judged as truth-telling in an US that accepts insanity as normal.
Yes there are military occupying New Orleans. The same mercenaries that are in Iraq are there, too. Here's a link to Stars & Stripes (scroll down) where a soldier complains about the private army that has been unleashed there. (are soldiers in Iraq also "nuts" for pointing this out?)
[link to www.estripes.com]
to WTFD - Your reaction to Ms. Sheehan is the same as mine when I watch GWB do his Beavis and Butthhead laugh and move his shoulders up and down. I am especially amused when he says things like subliminable and other unintelligible things. But when I start thinking about the almost 2,000 Americans killed in an illegal and immoral war (which we are not winning), I am sad and very angry. Sliming Cindy (the way you creeps slimed Kerry and are trying to slime Hillary) just won't work. She and her grin are the face of the growing anti-war movement. "The times they are a changing" so get used to it!!!!
- "The times they are a changing" so get used to it!!!! - claudo ================================================================
You're right. Can you say Chief Justice Roberts?
With the pending replacement of O'Connor and possibly one more supreme court justice by Pres. Bush "the times they are a changing"...
"She has been elevated as the front person for this group because she evokes sympathy. She is no more -- way of leading a movement than the neighborhood mouse that goes from house to house in your neighborhood looking for cheese is leading a movement. It's just -- it's just funny as it can be, but it's also sad at the same time because these are people who haven't amounted to diddly-squat, who desperately want to matter, and they are being led and inculcated, manipulated, and promoted in ways -- by people who actually do have an agenda..." -- Limbaugh
I'm confused. Is he talking about the Twitty woman, or the Schiavo's?
It's alway funny to see Rushbo gets all excited like this, his blustering has an direct realtionship to how much the topic gets under his skin. I would say on the Rush-O-Meter this one registers is about a 5 out of 10, a couple of childish insults about her IQ and lack of common sense and how she's being controlled by those with a anti-american agenda it's all just so laughable. Rush's empty rhetoric appeals to his audience because they are afraid of anyone that exposes the incompetance of this administrations blunder after blunder methodology of running this war of choice. Cindy Sheehan raises questions regarding the 'Noble Cause' for which her son and many others have given their lives, questions that are unanswerable as the reasons for the war are extracted from the shifting sands of opinion polls and political self preservation. Rush is merely a guage of those frustrations externalized and framed in palitable reasurring terms, pablum, that prevents his audience from having to move from their comfort zone of self righteousness regarding the war.
Rush is right. Sheehan doesn't have the IQ of a pencil eraser. Neither does Rush and neither do I. I know pencil erasers. Highly intelligent inanimate objects, they are. Able to do so much and never says a word in order to be criticized. Noone ever questions a pencil eraser and that's because it rules us all. Expect a ruler, the most dictative inanimate object ever.
For those reading to this point and still think I'm being serious, it's ok. You're permitted to take this as a joke now. :-)