About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Smerconish called Duke student's e-mailed threat to kill and skin exotic dancers "goofy"

April 12, 2006 3:36 pm ET

While discussing the allegations by a woman that she was raped by three men at an off-campus party hosted by Duke University's lacrosse team, Scarborough Country guest host Michael Smerconish characterized as "goofy" an e-mail sent by team member Ryan McFadyen hours after the alleged rape about exotic dancers he planned to host that read: "[I] plan on killing the bitches as soon as the [sic] walk in and proceding [sic] to cut their skin off."

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

On the April 11 edition of MSNBC's Scarborough Country, discussing the allegations by a woman that she was raped by three men who attended an off-campus party hosted by Duke University's lacrosse team, guest host Michael Smerconish characterized as "goofy" an e-mail sent by team member Ryan McFadyen hours after the alleged rape about exotic dancers he planned to host that read: "[I] plan on killing the bitches as soon as the [sic] walk in and proceding [sic] to cut their skin off." During the conversation with Court TV anchor Lisa Bloom, Smerconish said of McFadyen's message, which was uncovered on April 5 amid newly released court documents about the allegations: "It's called drunken e-mailing. The guy said something goofy. It doesn't make him a rapist." Bloom responded: "You think that's goofy? You find that goofy? You think discussion of murdering a woman and getting a sexual thrill out of that is simply goofy?"

From McFadyen's March 13 e-mail:

To whom it may concern

tommrow [sic] night, after tonights [sic] show, ive [sic] decided to have some strippers over [...] all are welcome.. however there will be no nudity. i [sic] plan on killing the bitches as soon as the [sic] walk in and proceding [sic] to cut their skin off [...]

From the April 11 edition of MSNBC's Scarborough Country:

SMERCONISH: Joining us now, Lisa Bloom from Court TV and criminal defense attorney Yale Galanter. Lisa, I know from our prior conversations, you and I are going to butt heads on this one.

BLOOM: Oh, yeah.

SMERCONISH: In my view, these athletes are easy targets, and oftentimes, claims get made against them. They fall by the wayside, months thereafter, but after their lives are ruined.

BLOOM: Michael, you don't see the arrogance in someone who would send an e-mail out to a group of people talking about the sexual thrill he would get killing and skinning a stripper? You don't see any arrogance in a team that one-third of them has arrests for disorderly conduct --

SMERCONISH: I think -- I think, Lisa --

BLOOM: -- public urination or breaking the law by drinking.

SMERCONISH: Lisa, I think they call it drailing. Lisa, they call it drailing.

BLOOM: When you have a beer, it's different than a teenager having a beer. It's against the law for them.

SMERCONISH: It's -- timeout. It's drailing. It's called drunken e-mailing. The guy said something goofy. It doesn't make him a rapist. Everybody wants to lynch this entire -- this entire squad so far.

BLOOM: You think that's goofy? You find that goofy? You think discussion of murdering a woman and getting a sexual thrill out of that is simply goofy?

SMERCONISH: Should we lock him up?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Lynn (April 12, 2006 3:48 pm ET)
         

      Just live the Beaver.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (April 12, 2006 3:50 pm ET)
         

      Like most media accounts, this piece leaves out the words in the email immediately following "cut their skin off," which clarify the email's sexually sadisitic nature and make what Smerconish is saying seem even stupider: [link to www.thesmokinggun.com]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by peet (April 12, 2006 3:58 pm ET)
           

        Those goofy pranksters.

        Whatever happened to TPing the library or throwing up after a kegger? This is one step beyond sociopathology.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ChristianDemocrat (April 12, 2006 3:58 pm ET)
         

      SMERCONISH: Should we lock him up?

      With this question, Smerconish seems to be implying that if the e-mail isn't illegal, then it's just goofy. Got to love those false dichotomies. I can't answer the question as to whether the e-mail consitutes an illegal threat, but I do find it sick, not just goofy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by defkon_4 (April 12, 2006 4:24 pm ET)
         

      I'm surprised Smearconish didn't pull a Limbaugh and equate the email to "hazing" or a "frat prank," just like Abu Ghraib.

      But I'm glad I finally understand the lexicon of the modern day Republican media pundit.

      Anti-war = traitor Abu Ghraib = frat prank Sexually sadistic email = goofy

      Am I missing anything else?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mr. l (April 12, 2006 4:25 pm ET)
         

      If that is his idea of 'goofy', then I don't want to know what REALLY tickles his fancy...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (April 12, 2006 4:26 pm ET)
         

      Stop making excuses for evil.

      Sexual depravity and sadism can't be construed as "Goofy" by any stretch of the imagination.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by joanl (April 12, 2006 4:47 pm ET)
         

      He even had that wacko Fred Phelps from the wacko church in Kansas on, why do they even give this guy an opportunity to preach his psycho babble?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by military_husband (April 12, 2006 4:48 pm ET)
         

      So we have an rape charge against the Duke lacrosse team and people like Smerconish, Savage and others still missing a huge point here: Even if the alleged rape never happened, are we supposed to think it is ok for minors to be involved in getting drunk and hiring strippers? I think not.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by joanl (April 12, 2006 5:14 pm ET)
           

        And people like Savage continue to attack this poor Girl for one reason , because she is black.

        Its racism.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by H-Man (April 12, 2006 8:17 pm ET)
           

        I think the point IS if the team raped this girl. I think it was irresponsible for the athletes to drink in season and hire a stripper. However probably half of the team is of drinking age and the rest are almost assuredly over 18. I don’t think we can crucify the team for doing what is done on nearly every college campus in the US. How many of us were drinking before we were of age. I think it is likely that nearly everyone who posts here did. I don’t think it is uncommon at all for any of these men to drink. Since they are all over 18 most of them could visit a strip club somewhere in the US or even Canada. Let’s not over crucify the athletes for what is (and has been ) common practice on college campuses everywhere. If they raped that girl they need to punished accordingly.

        As far as the email goes it is one of two things. First, it could be the rantings of a true sadist who receives his enjoyment at the physical humiliation and torture of women. It could also be a sick joke between teammates that was taken too far. Either way it was not appropriate and shows that he did not respect women. As a former college athlete I can tell you that there is a lot of over exaggerated bravado that is communicated in the locker room. And at times there may have not been a lot of respect for ladies by what was said but I never heard anyone say anything close to that.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by military_husband (April 13, 2006 7:03 am ET)
             

          Maybe I grew up in a different area then you, but NO ONE I knew or heard of, athletes or not, ever hired strippers to come to their house during college. Also most schools have very strict drinking policies in place regarding students (especially student athletes) in regards to drinking and behavior that could damage the school's reputation. But hey, rather than discuss the kind of male students who would get together and decide to get really drunk (most of them illegally) and hire some strippers to come over, let's pretend they are regular guys (boys will be boys) and that it is all the fault of the strippers, the other students, the prosecutor, the university itself, or anyone other than these kids and their incredibly bad judgment.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by H-Man (April 13, 2006 6:21 pm ET)
               

            Yes part of my point was boys will be boys. News flash many athletes drink. I don't think it is the smartest thing and we kept it to a minimum when I played (15 years ago). I by no means went to a party school either. I think we were ranked in the lowest 10 percentile for that. But in no way was I trying to blame the woman for what happened. She should have been able to dance for them and leave with everyone being happy. Alcohol intoxication is not an excuse. The woman being a stripper is not an excuse. EVERY woman deserves to work in a safe environment. Especially women who work in more dangerous areas like this woman. I'm sorry if you thought I was excusing the possible actions of these men. I was just trying to point out that the vast majority of college age men drink. And many times they drink to excess. I won't say they were more or less likely to commit a crime because they engage in behaviors that the majority of students around them do. Let's let the evidence speak for itself. Just because a bunch of dittoheads are jumping on the bandwagon to discredit the lady involved does not mean those of us on the left need to pre-convict the athletes.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by hmc_lavadogs5363 (April 12, 2006 5:18 pm ET)
         

      I always find it hypocritical when I hear these smug, WHITE, ELITIST on T.V. defending "the poor, adolescent WHITE BOYS, just out for a little fun" attitude of this country. I keep hearing how this is so damaging to these POOR WHITE BOYS it could leave a stain on their records. They may not grow up and vote Republican.

      If this would have been a white college student, mother, stripper (excuse me she would have been referred to as a dancer all this time) and the assailants were the Grambling State Basketball team. These guys would have been hand-cuffed on the spot (if not beaten half to death, remember this was in North Carolina) and be in jail waiting for their DNA results and the media would be screaming how awful these BLACK MEN are. How out of control these BLACK MEN are and something should be done about this awful situation.

      It is typical of this country, we will sentence a MINORITY MALE YOUTH to prison for years or even DEATHROW in a heartbeat without even blinking an eye. Remember sending an 11 year old BLACK BOY in Florida to life in prison for accidently killing that little black girl with wrestling moves. Now you have a couple of so called "WHITE BOY's" premeditated beating of homeless men to death with bats in Florida. Haven't heard a thing about that in months? Do you think the 17 yr. old will get the death penalty or even life in prison? I doubt it, it might ruin the POOR WHITEBOY's whole life and we could not stand-by and abide that. So this is just typical of justice (JUST US) in these United States.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by political_left-religious_right (April 12, 2006 5:21 pm ET)
         

      SMERCONISH: It's -- timeout. It's drailing. It's called drunken e-mailing. The guy said something goofy. It doesn't make him a rapist. Everybody wants to lynch this entire -- this entire squad so far.

      Goofy is akin to silly, ludicrous, a harmless deviation from reality, like calling your business a "Kar Wash." Vile threats like McFadyen made are a very different thing.

      Furthermore, "lynching" involves punishment without a trial. Nobody's advocating that.

      BLOOM: You think that's goofy? You find that goofy? You think discussion of murdering a woman and getting a sexual thrill out of that is simply goofy?

      Direct and to the point.

      SMERCONISH: Should we lock him up?

      And Smerconish cowardly backs away by refusing to answer. What a surprise.

      When someone who looks like Bull Shannon on nitrous oxide thinks that he is a fair arbiter of others' behavior despite reams of proof to the contrary, yet is still taken seriously by some, that is the epitome of "goofy."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by holly (April 12, 2006 5:49 pm ET)
         

      let's say I compose a letter to Smerconish, which is only a vowel away from Smearconish, by the way. And in this letter I detail what I'm going to do to his manly member, which will involve various dental tools (Are all you guys crossing your legs here? If so, sorry. I'll soon make my point.). And I sign it. And he reads it. And I detail the time and place, which the Duke player did: I'll state that I'm going to perform genital surgery on his Mr. Happy at 10 pm.

      Will this skinhead merely say, "What a goofy girl! Oh, that Holly!"

      Or will Security escort him to his car that night and will his legs be crossed all the way?

      Isn't this guy so far off the ideological dial that even Righties must forsake him?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (April 12, 2006 6:00 pm ET)
           

        I don't think the right ever forsakes anyone. Especially someone as mindless and gutless as this guy.

        And yes, I've got my legs crossed as I'm typing.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (April 12, 2006 6:07 pm ET)
           

        Be sure to mispell a couple of words, otherwise he will claim you were sober and not "drailing". As if being drunk excuses a death threat.

        I think these people get so wrapped up in this morals/class mentality, combined with binary thinking that they don't even realize how bizarre they are. White upper-class guys vs. a black stripper? No contest! Everything the stripper says and does is wrong, and everything the students do is excusable. Another possibility is that there's some sort of betting pool between Beck, Coulter, Malkin, Savage, Smerconish etc. as to who can say the stupidest and most offensive thing each month (this item has to be worth bonus points for Smerconish).

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (April 12, 2006 6:49 pm ET)
         

      Perhaps these lacrosse fellows had listened to the Bloodhound Gang's, "The Lapdance is Always Better When the Stripper is Crying". Perhaps it was pent up rage for being on the.....let's see....lacrosse team instead of a real sport. Who knows.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (April 12, 2006 8:21 pm ET)
         

      was a reference from the book American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis made into a movie. Not a movie high on my list.

      [link to en.wikipedia.org]

      [link to www.nostatusquo.com]

      "Two sources close to the team, who asked for anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that the e-mail was a reference to a movie called "American Psycho." In the movie, which the sources described as a cult favorite that had been viewed by a number of players on the team, a Wall Street banker goes crazy and kills several women, though possibly only in his dreams. After seeing the e-mail, sent on McFadyen's e-mail account, one of the team members remarked, "I'll bring the Phil Collins music," the sources said. In "American Psycho," the killer delivers a tribute to the music of pop singer Collins as he cavorts with intended victims."

      Also:

      "Interestingly, McFadyen was seen at a Take Back the Night rally held by Duke students protesting sexual violence and the alleged rape itself two weeks after the incident."

      [link to www.msnbc.msn.com]

      So, yeah, it was goofy drunken moronic copycat humor from guys that went and saw the movie.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (April 13, 2006 12:22 pm ET)
           

        Has there ever been anything that a right wing nut said that didn't make perfect sense to you? Some things are sick; besides there is nothing goofy about people who cultishly fantasize about repeating the gouhlish acts of a ficticious wall street serial killer. There wasn't a character in that movie with any redeeming social value and most of them were amoral; and the main character was a ghoul and he wasn't dreaming. The movie was really bad, no wonder Leonardo Decaprio turned down the role.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by leatherhelmet (April 13, 2006 12:59 pm ET)
             

          nor the author. Just trying to keep you informed on where the email came from and that he really wasn't into skinnin' peoples.

          Although I find anything Paul Krugman writes ghoulish and sickening if that helps.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by sasami (April 12, 2006 10:32 pm ET)
         

      ..if you're rich and white, you can say and do whatever you want when you're drunk!

      "It's not his fault, he got himself so drunk he didn't know what was happening!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (April 13, 2006 12:28 pm ET)
           

        Yeah our president was goofy (drunk driving, snorting cocaine, awoling, fighting his Dad) He goofed off for 40 years and then he decided to be governor, and all was forgiven. GW would never have ever seen the inside of a governor's mansion or the White house if he had been a goofy poor guy that F-up for 40 years and more so if he had been a goofy poor guy with brown skin. His prison record would have precluded that.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by leatherhelmet (April 13, 2006 1:51 pm ET)
             

          What a load of manure.

          I don't see a prison record on Obama.

          You are amazing you can inject race into every possible subject. Congratulations, you must be proud of that talent.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Lynn (April 13, 2006 2:12 pm ET)
               

            Now amazing is a wingnut who defends a cannibalism fetish as goofy.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Lynn (April 13, 2006 2:13 pm ET)
               

            I don't see a prison record on Obama.

            What does this even mean?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by holly (April 13, 2006 2:48 pm ET)
                 

              And I'm still waiting for the feminist and gay agendas.

              Lynn, I appreciate your a bit before this about brown skin precluding one's consideration for the presidency given Bush's record. Privilege and paleness seem to have kept him from the clinker.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by H-Man (April 13, 2006 6:42 pm ET)
                   

                Holly and Lynn,

                I believe what Leatherhelmet is referring to is Senator Obama's admission to doing drugs and drinking too much alcohol in his past. I live in Chi-Town and remember him speaking about that. I thought it would do him in but thankfully it did not.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Lynn (April 13, 2006 7:32 pm ET)
                     

                  I hadn't heard that. He must have really been careful not to get caught drunk/drug driving. Had he been his car would have been searched and if any drugs found he would have had the book thrown at him. Instead of being the distinquished Senator from Illinois today he he would have been convict number....... There is an interesting book I just read, it's Tavis Smiley's 'Covenent with Black America' The section on crime and race is very interesting. For instance in my home state Blacks make up about 27% of the population; but Blacks comprise like 79% of all traffic stops. Of those stops Blacks were 70% more likely to have their cars searched. I know one thing if I were a drug dealer I would use Leatherhelmet as a mule because they wouldn't stop him, and if they did he'd just talk right wingese to the officers and they'd let him go with a trunk full of drugs.

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by holly (April 13, 2006 9:06 am ET)
         

      BLOOM: You think that's goofy? You find that goofy? You think discussion of murdering a woman and getting a sexual thrill out of that is simply goofy?

      SMERCONISH: Should we lock him up?

      No, he should be censured. And guys like Smerconish should be doing the censuring. I'm not talking formal censuring, but men all across America, on the Left and the Right, should be stating, "Real men don't write about killing and stripping the skin off women. That's what serial killers do."

      If I ever have to share space with Smerconish, I'll do it under the condition that he be strapped to a dolly and masked like Hannibal Lecter.

      Now, I'm just waiting for Amy_in_Ohio to ask, "Haven't you ever heard of free speech?" and to inform us that 259,975 people listen to Smerconish and to say, "That's gotta mean something, doesn't it? DOESN'T IT???"

      Yeah, it means that those 259,975 people are the same people that buy "bum fight" videos so that they can feel alive and superior.

      I'm beginning to think that Smerconish isn't just prostituting for bling. I'm thinking that he suffers from some pathology that precludes him from considering the social ramifications of this situation. Regardless of whether these men are guilty or innocent, rich, white men in the South requested a poor, black woman for their pleasure. That alone suggests the stink of slavery. And stupidity. And arrogance. What a waste of their educations.

      And Smerconish: What a waste of a man.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by leatherhelmet (April 13, 2006 9:12 am ET)
           

        where they requested a poor black woman for a stripper.

        All I read is they called an escort service.

        Do you have any back-up for this allegation or is this just another chance to trash rich white college jerks?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by holly (April 13, 2006 9:58 am ET)
         

      ...that the escort services in that town dispatch white strippers for Duke students unless black strippers are requested.

      Leatherhelmet, you sure seem interested in this case. As a woman who's been sexually threatened by a pack of large young men, I have affinity. As a liberal concerned with racism, the inequities of class, and social justice, I have further interest. Why does this case tug at you?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (April 13, 2006 11:12 am ET)
         

      any articles on escort service policies so if you don't mind I will wait until I see something that verifies something that sounds to me like you are projecting. Nowhere have I read where the kid "ordered" a black stripper off the menu.

      I was a college athlete and worked in college sports and I find the case interesting given there have been similar cases at other schools (Minnesota and Pittsburgh) where in one case there was a gang rape and in the other the players taped a stripper trying to extort money from them.

      I have no particular interest other than to see the guilty party or parties caught.

      As far as an activist cause, I have none other than I find the liberal feminist agenda good up to a point, then I see it breaking down into statistical lies, racism, sexism, bigotry against athletes, class envy, distortion of facts and other problems liberalism out of control tends to flame.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by holly (April 13, 2006 11:44 am ET)
         

      I revealed why this case is particularly emotive for me. One can then reasonably extrapolate that I might not be as lucid as normal, given my values and my history.

      But I've noticed that you've posted about this case and your posts have been longer than in other threads and topics. Perhaps, as a college athlete, you witnessed a fellow athlete that was falsely accused. Perhaps you were falsely accused. What seems more likely is that whenever a story is told, we project ourselves into someone in the story. It's how we understand stories. So, I project my self into the stripper, which, to some degree, undercuts my lucidity and objectivity. You, being male and a former athlete, have projected your self into the accused rugby players. This is understandable.

      However, I seem to have a little more lucidity here than you. You are defending these boys at every opportunity. One student emailed another and threatened to kill and skin a stripper...and you...you dismiss this. Again, I ask you, don't you have women that you love? Aren't there women that love you? Slip into their skins and imagine that you, their father, their husband, their brother, is dismissing a young man that threatened to kill and skin a young woman. What do you see through their eyes? Can't you see the horror, the horror of a father, husband, and brother so bound and restricted by his restricting projection that he can't locate any outrage?

      Now, I'm liberal and a feminist. You referrred to a liberal feminist agenda. I missed that memo. So, what's the agenda? And why are you getting the agenda and I'm not. This is a crazy mixed-up world where conservative men are getting the agenda and feminists aren't.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by leatherhelmet (April 13, 2006 7:55 pm ET)
           

        not projecting myself as anyone in this life drama. I have been on these boards off and one for several years, less you think I am the Johnny Cochran of rapists.

        I can't believe you say you are a feminist and a liberal and then claim you don't know the agenda on rape, when you have spouted every single company line.

        The only defending I have done is against your inane charges. You think they are rapists because they are white. You think they are rapists because the stripper was black. You think they are rapists cuz they are rich. Cuz they are athletes. Cuz they saw a movie. Cuz they wrote a copycat email. You ignore all verified evidence. You can call the lacrosse players racists and rapists or any other accusation in the world but if anyone mentions one fact about the accuser we are rapist promoters.

        You claim they are racists because they specifically ordered a black stripper when there is no proof of it. Your constant lies about the case just bug me.

        Guess what? I don't want the D.A. to quit investigating until he finds an answer one way or another. If they did rape her, I want them jailed. If she is lying, I want her jailed. You don't want her jailed if she lied. You want the Lacrosse team jailed just for being rich, white and male. The rape is immaterial. You want them in prison because of a "culture" of rape dreamed up by your feminist ideals.

        Do you think it would be ok for people to picket the home of the accuser every night like they are to the accused? Would you support men having a "Take Back My Honor" night to represent all the falsely accused rapists whose lives have been ruined? Of course not, because that is not your agenda. You claim you don't have one, but you do. I want the strippers rights protected and a full and thorough investigation. I want someone to wade through the bullsh*t of the defense lawyers to facts. But I also want the players rights protected. They are innocent until proven otherwise.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by holly (April 13, 2006 11:53 am ET)
         

      Please also post the gay agenda. I've always wanted to see that too.

      I actually think there is a feminist agenda. Here it is: Women should equally share power and resources.

      Given that 98% of the world's land is titled to men and that there have been NO American female prezs or vice-prezs, feminists are sorely needed. Now, Leatherhelmet, come on. Be a man and become a feminist. Isn't protecting women and their rights a tenet of the Right?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ChristianDemocrat (April 13, 2006 1:32 pm ET)
           

        More like protecting their rights to their women...for some anyway, e.g., Dr. Dobson.

        Report Abuse