About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Robertson alleged that Planned Parenthood wanted to use MLK to promote "black genocide"

May 12, 2006 3:58 pm ET

Following a 700 Club segment about black ministers who oppose abortion, Pat Robertson claimed that Planned Parenthood supports "black genocide" and wanted to use Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as a black minister "who could do that for them."

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

On the May 11 edition of the Christian Broadcasting Network's The 700 Club, host Pat Robertson claimed that Planned Parenthood supports "black genocide" and wanted to use Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as a black minister "who could do that for them."

Following a segment about black ministers who oppose abortion, Robertson attacked Planned Parenthood, claiming the family planning organization that also provides abortion services is "an organization that's trying to set up black genocide," adding that the group's "dirty little secret" is that foundations that provide financial support to it "didn't want to support a bunch of indigent black babies" and "want to cut down on the incidence of black birth." Robertson then asserted that birth control pioneer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger also wanted "black genocide," and that she proposed a Planned Parenthood effort to hire "a leading black minister to lead the charge" and "selected Martin Luther King as possibly the person who could do that for them." Robertson concluded that "the record is out there; it's very clear. This isn't some conspiracy theory."

Planned Parenthood's response to allegations that Sanger supported a racial application of eugenics, a theory of socially controlling human reproduction, can be found here.

Media Matters for America has documented a number of comments Robertson has made about race. In November 2005 he said "Black folks aren't going to vote" for a Democratic nominee not nicknamed "Bubba." In February 2006, he suggested Europe was committing "racial suicide," and in March 2006 he called Muslims "satanic."

From the May 11 edition of the Christian Broadcasting Network's The 700 Club:

ROBERTSON: Planned Parenthood has gotten $100 million, $50 million each, from the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. Why do these wealthy, so-called Republican organizations pay for it? Because they were alarmed by the growth of the black community and they didn't want to support a bunch of indigent black babies. I mean, that's the dirty little secret in there. And the government itself has been funding Planned Parenthood to the tune -- much in excess of $100 million a year.

And if [Rev.] Barry Lynn [executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State] is concerned about a few people in prison praying for Jesus, he ought to be concerned about $100 million in an organization that's trying to set up black genocide because that's what Margaret Sanger wanted. And she also says that "I've got to find a leading black minister to lead the charge," and they selected Martin Luther King as possibly the person who could do that for them. So they were looking around to get somebody that they could hire to take this message that birth control is a good thing for the black people and abortion is a good thing. It's all there. I mean, you talk about a plan, it's a definite plan. I'm not trying to look at conspiracies, but the record is clear, and these black ministers, God bless them, have got great clarity in light of what's happening because it is black genocide, that is the idea, and the people who are funding these programs want that. They don't want a whole lot of unemployed young black people. They want to cut down on the incidence of black birth. And they're paying great sums of money to organizations like Planned Parenthood to bring that about. There was a big scandal a few years ago about the fact that they were setting up their abortion clinics in black neighborhoods, in the poor areas of cities. So the record is out there; it's very clear. This isn't some conspiracy theory. They've made it clear what they want to do, and the money is sloshing in from your taxes.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Yellow Bird (May 12, 2006 4:03 pm ET)
         

      Planned parenthood getting tax maney to set up clinics?

      Further, I am glad Rev R is on the board of planned parenthood; how else would he know all these interesting details?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Yellow Bird (May 12, 2006 4:03 pm ET)
         

      his churches are morally correct and working to protect the family : [link to www.click2houston.com]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (May 13, 2006 12:44 am ET)
           

        I seem to remember something about the Catholic Church leading the way in the treatment of young boys also.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Blue Dog (May 12, 2006 4:18 pm ET)
         

      I'm sure that when christ attends parties, he says things like "See that dude over there? He keeps telling people that he's my friend, but we don't know each other. What should I do about it? He sort of creeps me out."

      Report Abuse
      • Author by glackey8483 (May 12, 2006 11:16 pm ET)
           

        And he'd probably say, "is it just me or are people really really weird these days?"

        Wouldn't it be great if he could ask Robertson and the other evil drones for a retraction?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (May 13, 2006 12:47 am ET)
             

          The Jesus I know would rather have Scott McClellan doing the talking.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by deus_ex_machina (May 12, 2006 10:36 pm ET)
         

      Arf!

      (this is how some Brits on the internet respond to someone who has just posted something that is "barking mad")

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mybrotherskeeper (May 13, 2006 3:47 pm ET)
         

      Last week he also attacked the ACLU for having Communist origins, conveniently leaving out the fact that one of its founders (who soon thereafter became a former Communist) purged the organization of its Communist members back in 1940 (according to the wikipedia article).

      Also last week, Pat's son smeared the ABA for giving a "qualified" rating to a Bush appointee for the DC District, a change from the "well-qualified" rating the gave him one year or so ago. For Gordon Robertson the reason for the change has to be political sympathy for the Democrats, even though (if I am not mistaken) the ABA gave "well-qualified" ratings to both Justices Alito and Roberts, and even though the ABA gives very good reasons for revising its rating.

      (The real question, IMHO, is why the Bush administration feels the need to appoint an ideologue to the DC District bench. In other words, in what pending cases does it anticipate needing a "safe" judge to decide in its favor?)

      Report Abuse