Savage called Clinton's Rutgers speech "Hitler dialogue," added, "Goebbels would be proud of you"

I'm sure after this rant that many women will be consulting with the good Dr Savage about their difficult health decisions. Just what women need, an angry old man deciding for them what to do in a life or death situation. Savage again demonstrates his refusal to live in modern 21 st century reality.

Here comes the Supreme-Dictator court about to open pandora's box.... speaking of Lee on the other post, I believe the next U.S. civil war could be over abortion... keep taking peoples' rights over their own body away and there will be hell to pay...

Oh goodness, this thread is gonna be one huge can of worms.

Doesn't savage think he's smarter than everybody? =0

Why does Savage think that letting everybody have their rights is like Hitler, who wanted to take away people's rights?

Tapes from Michael Savage's radio show should be played at every Democratic campaign rally in the 2008 race.

I appreciate the Savage Weiner: he makes me remember what I'm fighting for.

"They're rubes. I've found people in New York to be the biggest rubes in America because -- for one reason: They think they're smarter than everybody. And those who think they're smarter than everybody are usually the rube, by the way."

I'd be hard pressed to find anyone on the radio dial who has a higher opinion of his own intellect than Michael Savage.

As for "Hitler dialogue," here's Savage on Muslims:

"Intelligent people, wealthy people...are very depressed by the weakness that America is showing to these psychotics in the Muslim world. They say, 'Oh, there’s a billion of them.' I said, 'So, kill 100 million of them; then there'd be 900 million of them.'" Savage has also advocated a nuclear attack on a "major Arab capital."

So Savage hates San Francisco (though he chooses to live there) AND New York... does he have anything nice to say about any major American cities? Or anything nice to say at all?

Hey! An entire Savage piece and not one mention of homosexuality. Stunning.

Michael Weiner is getting desperate.  Here's hoping his syndicator wises up and gives him the Don Imus Heave-Ho.

Savage doesn't even slur or smear intelligently.

Where on earth is the "Hitler dialog" remark coming from? I mean this doesn't even make sense.

If he's gonna attack Hillary he ought to at least do so in a way that has some reasoning & logic behind it.

I wonder how close Savage is to calling on all his listeners to round up suspected liberals for being traitors, faschist, appeasers and terrorist sympathizers.  Whenever I listen to him, I often think that its just a matter of time before he puts it all together and realizes that since (in his little mind) liberals are destroying our country and promoting dangerious ideas, they are just in the way from some kind of weineristic final solution.

To him our nation is too victimized, fagile and imperiled to tolerate any kind of deviation from the the struggle.  It would be interesting to hear what he would tell his loyal zomby callers if they told him they were going to clean some traitor appeaser faschist liberal house tonight.  I think it would put him in a tight spot since all these "nazi types" like Hillary are everywhere.  I wonder if he would talk them out of it and what kind of tortured logic would he use in order to contradict the logical implications of his rants.

If I were Savage, or anyone else on the right, I would stop bringing up Hitler, Nazis, or fascists because then they are only opening the door to being legitimately compared to the same.  Remember how much they all cry when those type of comparisons are made to them.  While they haven't reached those actual heights yet, their rhetoric is almost identical.

The really sad, depressing thing is not only that there were 8 million people who heard Savage make the ridiculous Clinton->Hitler comparison, but that these listeners will nevertheless tune-in again and again to him.  Like Savage, even the disturbed, hate-filled Hitler had millions of fans. Therein lies the real Hitler similarity ---but to Michael Savage, not Clinton.

Keep it up, Dr. Savage! The more these MMFA losers respond to you, the more they demonstrate that liberalism is indeed a mental disorder!

Not quite Hitleresque but it's pretty remarkable propaganda by the soon to be 2008 presidential runner-up.  The fact that she equates the courts upholding the ban on partial-birth abortions to a threat to womens' health is laughable.  Considering that this process is what, 10 inches from being called murder I gladly applaud the high court's decision.  I guess I'm "old fashioned" or "non-progressive" to think that once a fully formed, live child is halfway delivered that a doctor shouldn't be able to insert scissors into the back of it's head and suck it's brains out with a vaccum hose.  But I'm the right wing hate monger right?  The fact of the matter is that the monstrocity known as partial birth abortion very rarely if ever used in relation to the PHYSICAL well being of the mother.  The "womens' health" argument for this particular form of infanticide is a complete kanard.

I doubt that Savage knows that Goebbels poisoned 6 of his children.  I imagine that Goebbels hated the murdering, for it occurred in the Führerbunker as the Russians rained shells on Berlin.  Anyway, Savage, the failed academic, once again demonstrates why he wasn't selected for academia.  He's a sloppy thinker who repeatedly overlooks the complications in his comparisons.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that the court's decision "tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)."

  This stupid liberal hero can't even back up her own words with proof! What an idiot. If she is going to claim that the procedure is "necassary...in certain cases" she better be able to give an example of WHEN that procedure was necassary. But, like a true liberal, she CANNOT (and does not) give that proof. She even admits that in her dissent statement. The only thing she brought to the table was that abortion doctors say it is safe and needed. What a moron she is. She needs to retire, it is obvious that altziemers disease is hitting her hard. Looks like Bush might get one more addition to the Supreme Court before he leaves. Then we can start talking about getting abortions eliminated after the age of viability (20 weeks), of course with the 'danger to the woman's life' asterisk in place.

   I think liberals aren't taking much pleasure in the notion that abortion is being used as a birth control method and are losing their lock on keeping it legal. You're better off sticking with ru486, at least that procedure kills fewer woman than standard abortion procedures do.

YOu know what's really scary?  The true test of the Consitituionality of this latest ruling will be when a woman dies a painful death because a doctor could not legally perform a late-term abortion to save her life. 

To me that's more Hitlerian than anything Hillary said. 

As the cherry picking continues

Putting this particular comment aside, those of you that are loyal listeners of Savage like myself, AUTOPSYCHIC and the others did you happen to listen to Mondays show? Because I found it to be very inspirational for the most part. I ask no comment from you liberals on this one, that is unless you actually listened to that show of which I predict you didn't.

I would like to once again give you taste of some of his early writings.

                    MANS USEFUL PLANTS 1976

INTRO: To those of us who buy our food in stores, heat our homes with fuel transported over long distances or pick our clothing from long and neatly ordered racks, sitting and enjoying the beauty of nature may seem to be the most perfect use plants can afford.                                                                                   

Early man however, did not have much time to sit and gaze at trees and flowers. He was busy gathering food from trees, first the easily picked fruits and leaves and later the bark, roots and seeds to see if  they too, could sustain him.

When he discovered fire, he began to use grasses, shrubs, vines and trees as fuel. Fuel to light the torches that became the first effective weapons against mammoths, tigers and bears. Fire to keep him warm, to make foos delicious, to harden the points of spears and arrows. Fire to lead him through a world of darkness.

Some of our primitive ancestors emerged from cave dwellings and began to build shelter from the tough, flexible trunks and branches of their wooden allies. In warmer climates men lived under the protective canopy of the forest or in the trees foe safety from prowling beasts.

Man the hunter needed tools or weapons. Not content with  just throwing stones, he invented an early version of the tomahawk by tying stones to a tough stick with vines. Eventually our hairy and resourseful ancestors poked and prdded, sniffed and tasted almost every fruit and leaf that attracted them. Some no doubt, died or became violently ill from poisonousplants, but thr most intelligent groupslearned to distinguish the safe and even tasty plant foods from the dangerous or deadly.

People get sick, evensome of the toughest people of the most primitive tribes. To cure sickness, to treat the pains of wounds, early man turned to the xonfusing tangle of the plant world as well as to the animals for medicine. It was then believed the "like cures like" and that for every illness there existed a cure. Primitive healers often selected plants on the basis of shape and color. Leaves shaped like the human liver were used to heal disorders of the liver: a piece of gnarled wood was used to treat convulsions, and so on. Byn learning to recognize the signs of the plant world, early doctors believed they could cure most illnesses. Although today medicine is no longer practiced according to such simple theory, many of our most important medicines still come from plants-plants that grow beneatth the sea, along the shores, upon the rocks of runningstreams and in the woods, fields and deserts.

WOULD All you right wing nazis please sign up for this war you love you much?

Mans Useful Plants contiued;

Clothing was originally made from the skins of animals, but later it was woven from the fibers of stems, seeds and laves. Today fibers span from the same natural sources are increasing in demand.

Some men found less practical applications for certain plant products. Not only were berries eaten, but their juices were used as paint. Our ancestors often decorated themselves with bracelets and beads from polished nuts and seeds, and music was played on instruments crafted of wood and other vegetable products. Even today primitive music is played on instruments of gourds, wood, stems and reeds, and the finest string instruments in modern orchestras are still made of wood.

Slowly the use of plantsevolved from foods and fuel to weapons, shelter, clothing, medicine and thousands of other products. As time progressed, inquisitive man attempted to use every resource, whether of animal, mineral or vegetable origin. In doing so, he learned to perfect his techniques and to extract the most useful products with the least effort.

Today great industries spin on products of the soil, and some of these products are described in this book. Before looking at them, we should orient our thinking along the lines of the present "energy crisis". Is our supply of foodand   other essential products that are derivedfrom plants subject to a "plant crisis"? Will we be faced with a shortage of grains and vegetables, as well as a loss of some of man's favorite spices, such as pepper, mustard or cinnamon? Will we gradually have to give up beverages that are made from plants, such as tea, coffee, chocolate, beer, wine and some soft drinks such as cola ans gingerale?

If the supply of plants on which we depend on for food becomes short, we may wonder about those other products and delights that are very much a part of our civilizationand are often essential to our survival. Will the plants from which we make many important medicines-such as penicillin, digitalis, birth-control pills and the opium derived pain relievers-begin to disappearin the immediate future?

As we are beginning to see shortages in other plant-derived products as well, such as fabrics and clothing made of cotton and flax, ropes and thread made from Manila hemp and paper, plastics and other productsthat are derived from wood or cellulose? Is rubber in short supply? Are there any other sources of rubber besides the few species that are presently cultivated in South America and the Far East? Since soaps, paints, varnishes, lubricants, candles and cooking oils are made from many useful oil plants, are we to lose these prducts in the event of a future "plant crisis"?

In an attempt to answer these questions, this book describes many products of the plant world and the plants from which they are derived. While the reader learns to appreciate some of the many ways in which he is dependent on the plant kingdom, he may come to realize that the plant world is a resource that must br nutured carefully, lest a wide-scale loss of useful plants occur.

Plants are not finite, in the sense that they eithrt renew themselves or are prpagated by man or other animals. However, should man lose the forsight of the most intelligent of his species and fail to protect the world of plants-abusing it instead through overusr or neglect, chemical fogs or fires, or simply by paving over too many natural areas-he will lose not only many products and foods but those places to rest and dream which make life worth living.

"WOULD all you right wing nazis please sign up for this war you love so much"?

First of all, where did you get the idea that right wingers like myself love this war. Nobody loves war except of course the people at the top. Secondly I highly suggest that  you go onto talkradionetwork.com and listen to Savage's show on Tuesday April 24. You will not believe what is going on behind the scenes of this war. You will hear how our Marines that were accused of wrong doing in the Haditha incident are being prosecuted and tortured BY OUR OWN MEN. You better read that again. In many cases our marines have to wear a camera on their helmet when they go out so that if they get into a firefight they have to prove that they didn't shoot first. Instead of you liberals getting so worked up about how the enemies are being "so called" tortured, maybe you should focus on how our own marines are being tortured BY OUR OWN MEN and violating the Geneva Convention.