Olbermann named Limbaugh "Worst Person," flagged Lehrer post about Morgan
On the May 17 edition of MSNBC's Countdown, host Keith Olbermann named nationally syndicated radio host Rush Limbaugh the "winner" of his nightly "Worst Person in the World" segment for complaining that, as Media Matters for America noted, Democrats are not asked "why there are no women and minorities on stage" during presidential debates. On the May 16 broadcast of his radio show, referring to the May 15 Republican presidential debate, Limbaugh asserted that "there's a template developing for the Republican debate last night. 'How come there are no women and minorities on stage?' I guess you forgot about 2004." He added: "And I guess -- you know, the Democrats never get those kinds of questions because it's always assumed that they're fair and just, and not discriminatory and all that." During the "Worst Person" segment, Olbermann said: "Or, and this is just a theory, maybe it's because at the Democratic debate there were women and minorities on the stage. I thought you were a more worthy opponent than this, sir. I forgot you were comedian Rush Limbaugh: today's 'Worst Person in the World.' "
Olbermann also named Republican strategist Bay Buchanan the "Runner-Up" for asserting in her new book, The Extreme Makeover of Hillary (Rodham) Clinton (Regnery Publishing), that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY) is defined by a "debilitating" "lack of confidence and self-esteem," and that, "[a]fter days of research, I was led to a fascinating field of study involving narcissistic personality style." As Media Matters documented, Buchanan then referred to an endnote -- which is apparently missing from the book -- that purportedly offers "symptoms of the related disorder," despite her assertion earlier in the book that she is "not ... a medical professional." Olbermann highlighted the fact that Buchanan's endnote apparently does not exist, and added: "Also, that phrase 'days of research,' Bay, it may not be as impressive as you thought when you wrote it."
Finally, Olbermann gave conservative radio host and Move America Forward (MAF) chairman Melanie Morgan the "bronze" for her appearance on the May 8 edition of Public Broadcasting Service's The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, during which, in Olbermann's words, "she proceeded to shout [co-founder and chairman of VoteVets.org Jon] Soltz down every time he tried to speak." Olbermann had awarded the producers of the NewsHour the "bronze" on Countdown's May 10 "Worst Person" segment for hosting Morgan to discuss Iraq policy despite her extensive history of spreading false, misleading, and unsubstantiated claims regarding the Iraq war, as Media Matters has noted.
Olbermann also cited a May 17 post on PBS' website by Linda Winslow, the NewsHour's executive producer, in which Winslow responded to viewer complaints regarding the May 8 program featuring Morgan and Soltz. Winslow wrote:
Last night the NewsHour attempted to help our viewers understand why the members of Congress are having so much difficulty arriving at a decision regarding the way forward in Iraq. We believe the intensity of the pressure being exerted on Democrats and Republicans by the "wings" of their respective parties is having an impact on those who are looking for some sort of compromise position. We decided to let representatives of those wings explain their positions, hoping they would participate in a dialogue with us and each other. As our guests demonstrated, however, that was a forlorn hope and the result was a lot of heat, but very little light.
Since neither guest was in the studio with Judy Woodruff, there wasn't much she could do to prevent them from interrupting one another, short of saying -- as she did at least three times -- "please let him/her finish his/her point". The NewsHour style is to ask pointed questions politely; we expect our guests to subscribe to the same rules. Since the program is produced live, we can't do much to eliminate rude guests from your television screen once the segment has begun; what we can do is guarantee you will never see that person on our program again.
From the May 17 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:
OLBERMANN: The real American Idol, suffering from a shocker -- you mean the shock that people still cared. That's ahead, but first, time for Countdown's latest list of nominees for "Worst Person in the World." The bronze to right-wing water-carrier Melanie Morgan, who had been inexplicably invited on to the PBS NewsHour with Jim Lehrer to debate Jon Soltz of VoteVets.org in war-funding issues.
She proceeded to shout Soltz down every time he tried to speak. Good for her ego, bad for her long-term viability. Responding to viewer complaints, NewsHour executive producer Linda Winslow responds: "Since the program is produced live, we can't do much to eliminate rude guests from your television screen once the segment has begun. What we can do is guarantee you will never see that person on our program again." Buh-bye.
Our runner-up tonight: commentator Bay Buchanan, positing a theory that Senator Clinton is suffering from extreme insecurity that disqualifies her to be president. Miss Buchanan writes in a new book, quote, "Not being a medical professional, I decided to look more deeply into the condition. After days of research, I was led to a fascinating field of study involving narcissistic personality style. The symptoms of the related disorder were intriguing. I have included them in an end note."
And then it has that little 74, indicating you should go read Chapter 1, Note 74 for details. Of course, there is no Note 74 in her book. Also, that phrase, "days of research," Bay, it may not be as impressive as you thought when you wrote it.
But the winner: comedian Rush Limbaugh, one of those days to be extra-special glad you're not him. I'll just read this verbatim. May I? "There is a template developing for the Republican debate last night. How come there are no women and minorities on stage? You know, the Democrats never get these kinds of questions because it's always assumed that they are fair and just and not discriminatory and all that."
Or, and this is just a theory, maybe it's because at the Democratic debate there were women and minorities on the stage. I thought you were a more worthy opponent that this, sir. I forgot you were comedian Rush Limbaugh: today's "Worst Person in the World."
















I don't understand why this Olbermann bit doesn't have it's own column here like Boehlert and Foser? And then his Worst Person awards could be inserted daily for perusal. Just a suggestion........
I think before MMFA considers such a move, O'Reilly will have present a flowchart with a red arrow going directly from Soros to Olbermann.
Good point. I can't get enough flow charts in my life. And soon O'Reillys will look like cooked spaghetti.
MMFA = Olbermann.
That is why he gets a free pass from many posters on here. Especially after the Harwood incident. It is a disgrace that the man gets free advertising.
I, for one, was disappointed that Olbermann let that go.
I think you're nuts if you believe that MMFA is the reason for Olbermann's upward ratings trend. I think it's the implosion of the Bush agenda and Keith's no-B.S. approach to reporting it that's earning him more viewers, but I could be nuts, too.
Actually many liberal posters here take Olbermann to task fairly regularly.
Solon, you must not be familiar with Caseyspring's Theorem;
MMFA = Olbermann.
I took Keith to task for not making Imus a Worst Person winner (or make that 'loser') because he was an MSNBC co-worker. Then Keith said he didn't have anything to do with Imus for years, and didn't want to beat a dead horse......lol Lame.
Olbermann said that he was restricted from calling Imus to task in public, but he did much in private to have Imus punished for his misdeeds. His stance on Imus' behavior is clear. The fact that he was restricted from commenting publicly before Imus was fired does not affect what he thought about Imus' behavior!
I don't understand why this Olbermann bit doesn't have it's own column here like Boehlert and Foser?
Great idea Tommy. Olberman is a Liberal partisan. He'd fit the bill.
Olbermann's Awards are about as significant or important as O'Reilly's would be if he was giving out the same type of awards on Fox.
Keith can't name his co-workers, and of course Bill wouldn't. Keith, by & large only gives out awards to Conservatives, and various "civilian" kooks [has he ever given one to a Dem/Lib?], Bill of course would present the awards to the Left.
I used to watch Bill. Found him too partisan. So I switched to Keith. He's just as bad.
So now I watch neither.
Keith is MMFA's boy-toy. That's why this thread is here.
BTW before someone says that I didn't comment on Rush...I already did so on the thread yesterday. What's the point of repeating ourselves on these rerun threads?
Jeter2- KO- Media Matters- "Boy toy" ?
Creative. The point is Keith is the only broadcaster calling the misinformers out! I'm sure they'd include others- if there were others...
Which is sad.
The 3 mentioned in this article we are posting about are the height of absurdity.
Keith has named himself "worse person in the world" and yeah, his segment does lean towards the so called conservative wing-nuts. These are the people who are being given a voice in the mainstream media!
I'm glad to see Media Matters acknowledge Keith's shout-outs. They actually complement one another.
Talk about reruns.
First the I am so balanced approach: I listen to neither the left or the right and then the pretentious little digs: "Keith is MMFA's boy-toy.", "[MMFA] rerun threads". I'd say you repeat yourself quite consistently. You don't have to hide behind a "fair and balanced" facade, come out of the closet, express your partisanship openly, it's transparant anyways.
ajwan,
I am a registered Republican & a Conservative, two facts I have never kept secret here. But I do attempt to keep an open mind.
Note I didn't praise either O'Reilly or Olbermann.
Also go read the O'Reilly thread, I didn't exactly write anything favorable.
So ajwan, I at least try to be impartial. You should try it sometime.
Oh gosh what a surprise. Another thread full of tommy's narcissistic demand that each and every word MMFA writes be approved by him. Makes reading the comments such a joy. But then that is the aim of a partisan troll, isn't it...
I am so glad to have brought you joy today. Next time, please send me your inane comments for approval or they just may get posted here.
Hilarious. Go Keith. I can't wait for Morgan to accuss him of "taking her words out of context" and "trying to silence her" like she always says.
And Morgan portrays herself as a victim quite well, doesn't she? She's pimping the First Amendment when all that her critics are trying to do is get her microphone taken away. The First Amendment does not guarantee her or anyone else a lucrative radio gig, but she's perfectly within her rights to stand on a street corner spewing lies and hate.
I'm of two minds when it comes to addressing comments from proven idiots of the Limbaugh type.
A. Ignore them, thus reducing the risk of further spreading their nonsensical remarks and/or feeding their inflated egos.
or...
B. Confront them at every opportunity by pointing our why their words lack integrity and hope that sensible people who might have been swayed by their remarks might arrive at a more reasonable conclusion.
The more I view this American left-right battle of ideologies, the more convinced I am that few, if any, are actually swayed by what the other side is saying - irrespective of how logical one's arguments might be. It would seem to me that the polarization of the U.S. has reached a point where few are bothering to listen anymore. This, I fear, is not a good thing.
As an example, I can envision the day when the terrorists do repeat a 9/11 attack. The left will claim that it was inevitable and that the Iraq fiasco helped fuel terrorism while the right will blame it on the left's inability to stomach a fight by not supporting the Iraq war and "finishing the job."
What I am asking, I think, is this; How do Americans move on from this point and begin to resemble a unified people? I can't see it happening anytime soon.
A President above 30% would be a good start.
Things can turn around quickly with better leadership.
Good points, (I pick "A", btw)
It's very hard these days of 24/7 news channels, the internet, etc. And people have figured out that controversy sells - so the more polarizing and partisan some can be, the more entrenched their loyalists become against the opposition. But Bruce's point is a good one, we need a President who can lead, not divide.
I wonder what Pat Buchanan thinks
That Olby is calling his sister bad names. I guess Buchanan might call him Chris again like he did the night of the GOP debate. Why does MSNBC allow this type of division ?
The NewsHour was surprised that Melanie Morgan was rude? A little bit of research would have told them that she's a loudmouthed, Ann Coulter wanna-be. What did they think they were getting when they booked her?
The NewsHour was surprised that Melanie Morgan was rude? A little bit of research would have told them that she's a loudmouthed, Ann Coulter wanna-be. What did they think they were getting when they booked her?
The News Hour acted appropriately inviting her. They are one of the few news organizations left with any integrety, and really try to present a "fair and balanced" view. They also acted appropriately in promising their viewers who complained that someone who behaved badly would not be invited back.
I wonder how they decide in the MM office who gets the honor of writing these inane Olbermann threads.
Short straw? Hand Pound? The one who missed the staff meeting?
Keith Olbermann: 100
Shush Limbaugh: -1,000
All worthy recipients of their awards... Well-spotted, Keith.
Just wondering where Keith got wind of Morgan's PBS appearance? Or did I miss it here?
Wednesday May 8, Tommy, Oldermann's just a little slow on the draw this week.
Let's put the brakes on this fun little rightwing bus ride right now...
Olbermann is also reporting that Morgan is now 86'ed from the News Hour. Producer Linda Winslow's statement regarding Morgan's appearance was issued yesterday (May 17th).
A little slow on the draw today, Oscar?
Not really, just don't have all day to sit around perusing this (or other) blog sites. Have a full time job and a family. Oldermann's award should have gone to Leher for even inviting Morgan on, but KO is KO so the award goes to .................. Morgan, of course. A week after the fact, but WTH.
You missed it here.
When any of these websites
www.mrc.org
www.newsbusters.org
reaches over 300 posts in a comments section...
http://mediamatters.org/items/200705140001?f=h_side
Comeback and see us... TROLL
Actually, DTrain, some of those sites, just like Freeperville, do get a lot of comments, but if you eliminate the ones that consist entirely of "ping", "praise the lord" or "God bless Bush", they're left with only a handful, and most of those copy and pasted talking points and incoherent rambling.
God Bless You, HBL
Have a swell weekend, King.You and your little dog Jesus. ;0)
I guess I was referring to specifically media watchdog groups.
Heres some more:
dam near 300! Read 'em and weep
http://mediamatters.org/items/200704260003
over 200 here
http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300004
over 100 here
http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010005
about 100 here
http://mediamatters.org/items/200702120007
Is PBS Trying to become FOX by hiring Morgan>
Not according the producer of the News Hour. Her statement pretty much says that Morgan will not be back. I think Jim Lerher doesn't ever want to see his show sink to the depths of cable "news". That's why a vast majority of the time you don't see people yelling at or talking over each other on the News Hour.
Maybe Keith will find time to give some news orginizations the award two of the strories that seem to be going by the wayside this Comey testomony,the Wolfowitz debacle heard the treasury secratary on the newshour saying that he hope that things would work out for wolfowitz,huh! The comey story is really the big one that is being put on the back burner.
I watch the Newshour nearly every day. It's a great place to go if you want extensive coverage of the same stories everybody else is covering. I got really tired of the lead story being Monicagate for months on end, for example. I would really like to see that done with Gonzogate.
Because that show is on PBS most people would say it's left-leaning. I think not. Center right would be my assessment. Watch Moyers Journal tonight for proof that "the truth has a well known liberal bias."