On Morning Joe, John Ridley "hope[s]" Novak will "clarify" his Meet the Press comments
During the 6 a.m. ET and 8 a.m. ET hours of the July 18 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, commentator John Ridley said he was "curious" about syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak's July 15 assertion during a panel discussion on NBC's Meet the Press that, as Media Matters for America documented, "Republicans are very pessimistic about 2008. When you talk to them off the record, they don't see how they can win this thing. And then they think for a minute, and only the Democratic Party, with everything in their favor, would say that, 'OK, this is the year either to have a woman or an African-American to break precedent, to do things the country has never done before.' " During the 6 a.m. ET hour of the show, Ridley -- who wrote about Novak's comments in a July 17 post on the Huffington Post blog -- quoted Novak's statement and said: "I'm actually curious. I hope that Mr. Novak will clarify this." Ridley continued: "So are the Republicans hopeful for change? Or are they hopeful that when you have a black or a woman running on the Democratic ticket, a majority of Americans will go, 'Nah. I ain't voting for that.' " Novak was scheduled to appear during the 8 a.m. ET hour of the show.
During the 8 a.m. ET hour, before the interview with Novak, Ridley again quoted Novak's statement and said: "And so I was curious, just hopefully he could elaborate, what he means by hope." Ridley then stated, "By the way, if he is talking about a Wilder effect, here, referencing [former Virginia] Governor Doug Wilder [D], I don't necessarily disagree with that." The "Wilder effect" refers to the theory that African American candidates sometimes do better in pre-election polling than they do in the actual election because some voters tell pollsters that they will vote for the African American candidate but choose a white candidate instead on Election Day. After mentioning the Wilder effect, Ridley then asked: "[I]s he saying that the Republicans' only hope come November is hoping that there is some latent bigotry in America who -- that wouldn't vote for a man of color or a woman for president?"
As Media Matters noted, neither Meet the Press host Tim Russert nor any of Novak's fellow panelists, Bloomberg News Washington managing editor Al Hunt, Republican strategist Mike Murphy, and Democratic strategist Bob Shrum -- all of whom are, like Novak, white men -- commented on or challenged Novak's assertion. As Media Matters has also documented, a breakdown of the guests on Meet the Press from 2005 to 2006 shows that 76 percent of the guests on the program were white men.
During the interview -- which, according to Scarborough, occurred later in the broadcast than expected due to "some mix-up" -- Novak was not asked about his comments on Meet the Press. Scarborough did state, however, that Novak would return at 7:30 a.m. ET on the July 19 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe to continue the conversation.
From the 6 a.m. ET hour of the July 18 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
SCARBOROUGH: So John Ridley has a -- your Huffington Post.
RIDLEY: On Huffington.
SCARBOROUGH: And you've written this column saying that the only thing the Republicans have going for them, according to Bob Novak, are that they're white.
RIDLEY: Well, it was interesting. They had the roundtable discussion with Tim Russert on Meet the Press. Everybody was, you know, galvanized by the [Sen. Jim] Webb [D-VA]-[Sen. Lindsey] Graham [R-SC] cage fight. But there was something that he said. Republicans, right now, as you probably know, are a little pessimistic. I think you had something interesting yesterday that 21 percent of the people -- they still don't know who they're gonna vote for.
SCARBOROUGH: Unknown is leading on the Republican side.
RIDLEY: Unknown leads the pack for the Republicans.
SCARBOROUGH: So what's the Republicans' hope?
RIDLEY: Well, as -- and I want to -- I'm actually curious. I hope that Mr. Novak will clarify this, but he was talking about, that this year -- and this is a quote from him -- "the Democrats will either have a woman or an African-American to break precedent, to do things the country has never done before, and it gives the Republicans hope." So are the Republicans hopeful for change? Or are they hopeful that when you have a black or a woman running on the Democratic ticket, a majority of Americans will go, "Nah. I ain't voting for that."
SCARBOROUGH: Well, I think it's the latter. I really do. I think a lot of people will stop and think -- I think it's a little different with Hillary because Hillary's been around for a long time. She has her sort of own identity. Barack Obama, though, I think for a lot of people out there that, again, have not followed these candidates as much as anybody else are thinking: "Hey, he's that young black guy that's really energetic and exciting." And so it's going to be very interesting.
From the 8 a.m. ET hour of the July 18 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
SCARBOROUGH: Now, you had concerns with Bob Novak -- who's supposed to be calling in -- about Novak and what he said this weekend on Meet the Press.
RIDLEY: Well, more curiosity because I don't --
SCARBOROUGH: And this, by the way, this is on the top of Huffington Post right now.
RIDLEY: Yeah. This is Huffington Post. I wrote about it. Look, it was a heck of a show on Meet the Press on Sunday. Something happened --
SCARBOROUGH: Oh. Great show.
RIDLEY: Yeah. You had the Webb-Graham cage match. But at the roundtable, Tim Russert was talking to some other individuals about how the Republican Party is disenfranchised at this point. They're not raising money, they don't know who they want their front-runner to be. And Mr. Novak said something regarding the Democrats that -- and this is a quote -- "This is a year either to have a woman or an African-American to break precedent, do things the country has never done before, and it gives the Republicans hope."
And so I was curious, just hopefully he could elaborate, what he means by hope. And, by the way, if he is talking about a Wilder effect here, referencing Governor Doug Wilder, I don't necessarily disagree with that. But is he saying that the Republicans' only hope come November is hoping that there is some latent bigotry in America who -- that wouldn't vote for a man of color or a woman for president?
SCARBOROUGH: Well, I think it's -- I think it is obviously something that's never been done before. So --
MIKA BRZEZINSKI [news anchor]: And the question is, are the times right, is the historic moment here?
RIDLEY: It is, but the bigger question for me is, is that what he's saying the Republicans -- that's what they're running on? They can't run on the war, they can't run on national security, they can't run on family values.
SCARBOROUGH: You know what they can run on?
RIDLEY: What can they run on?
SCARBOROUGH: They can run on the fact that they've got a president that, every time he opens his mouth, makes history. You see, [late-night talk show host David] Letterman has these things -- great moments in presidential speeches.
RIDLEY: Yeah.
SCARBOROUGH: Had another one last night.
[...]
SCARBOROUGH: All right, hey, Bob, we've got to go because we, unfortunately, we had some mix-up --
NOVAK: Sorry, but I look forward to talking to you tomorrow.
SCARBOROUGH: I'll see you tomorrow morning at 7:30.
NOVAK: Terrific. Thank you, Joe.











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles



Novak said what he meant--The only hope of Republican's winning the Presidency is if they send up a white male against a woman or an African American.
Novak was apparently just having a Trent Lott moment...he let his inner racist shine through, and by extension, implied an inherent racism within the Republican party which may or may not be there. I can't wait to hear his "explanation".
Novak isn't going to explain anything. He is going to say, "This is BS" and then storm off the stage or hang up the phone.
Although Novak didn't mention them, the only hope for the Repugnants is that the DOJ can suppress enough votes, that, together with Diebold, ES&S, et al, the Repugnants can elect a dog-catcher in East Podunk, Mississippi. Even that, the Dems should contest, unlike the thefts of the past 8 years.
I agree, Rick. He did. I'm not sure whether or not Novak is racist or not, but he clearly implied that if the R's are to win in 08, they surely need the overwhelming votes of those among us who feel that way. Other than that, the R's have no chance.
Novak's point is nonsense anyway.
Any voter who will refuse to vote for an African-American or a woman will vote Republican even if the Democrats run a white male.
I think you're correct. Which to me enforces his belief that the undecideds are as bigoted as he.
At this point, I think the Democrats can win even if Mike Gravel is their nominee in 2008. I actually met Mike Gravel in person, and he's a nice guy and very intelligent. It actually wouldn't be bad if Mike Gravel was President of the United States of America. Novak has had some racial issues in the past, but I think at least part of what he was saying here was, basically, that things are so bad for Republicans in 2008, that why would the Democrats want to use this particular cycle to try out something new that might alienate voters, such as having someone other than a white male on either slot of their national ticket. Don't do anything to mess it up when it looks like you might have it made. I see what he's saying, but when will there ever be a good time. Personally, I don't care if your skin is any color that exists or if your a hermaphrodite, as long as you're not going to be another George Bush.
THANK YOU.
njguy93@yahoo.com
RIDLEY: It is, but the bigger question for me is, is that what he's saying the Republicans -- that's what they're running on? They can't run on the war, they can't run on national security, they can't run on family values.
If the Republicans can't run on any issue is Novak implying that the Republicans can win on racism or sexism? It would appear that way given Novak's comment about having a black or woman running on the Democratic Party ticket giving Republicans hope.
Novak simply forgot momentarily that he was on camera, and not at the bar with these guys.
I think the Republicans will go with their strenth, selling fear. I suppose Neocons is more acurate. How long will they hold the GOP hostage?
I'm hoping they go with their strengths, which is selling tax cuts. They have been able to do that successfully. After the latest round of increases proposed by the D's, the tax on cigars going from 5 cents to 10 bucks to help pay for children's health care. Talk about a scare tactic and putting the tobacco industry on its heels. Real good, guys. Who would ever vote Dem? Thank God W plans to veto it. I'd vote for him again just based on that.
Yeah, tax cuts. Who is going to pay off our deficit? The veto you are talking about had widespread bi-partisan support (I think Orrin Hatch was a co-sponsor).
What a scare tactic, continue a program that has provided health care to kids who need it, what a guy!
"Yeah, tax cuts. Who is going to pay off our deficit?"
We can use this.
I think you are missing the point. It is a 20,000 percent increase on cigars. Only the D's would come up with such a program. Those children who may or not benefit, they are not mine, and I have no obligation to pay for their health care. That would be their parents problem.
I'm sure Rush will let you keep sucking on his old cigar for free.
You want to cough up some evidence this is true? So far it is a RUMOR that sounds suspiciously like the kind of info that orignited from the beareu of Rushs butt.
Dave, I don't believe you have to pay this phantom tax if you don't smoke...so if you smoke, I don't care...talk to your parents amybe they will help you
Well, Dave, let me ask you this: Since we all pay private health care, shouldn't your premiums be much, much higher than mine since you are a smoker? Why should my premiums increase in the future to pay back the expenses that you and many smokers cost me?
The program was a valuable one and should be continued in some way. Hatch's support lends credibility to the notion that this is not something only the "D's could come up with" (paraphrasing) as he is about as far away from the D's as one could get.
Voting for "W?" Again? For any reason? You sir, are an imbicle.
Conscious soul , he'd vote for Bush because the GOP is good at selling imaginary tax cuts and vetoing imaginary $10 cigar taxes. Can't you read?
HBL:
Yes, I remember the first signs of that GOP middle-class tax cut ... it was $600 for an average family. Per year. In that SAME YEAR, though, health care insurance premiums, gasoline prices, tuition, energy costs, and the cost of prescription drugs skyrocketed.
And speaking of skyrockets, rocket scientists like our own DAVE here seems to think that it's a great deal getting such a tax cut, when the reality is that everybody is MUCH WORSE OFF considering all the other "changes" the GOP brings to our lives.
Well, ALMOST everybody is worse off. Those who smoke $10 cigars have made out like bandits ... because that's what they are. ALL GOP policy is geared towards making the already very wealthy even wealthier, at the expense of everyone else. And DAVE is their advocate, trying to convince us that these tax-cutting fools of the GOP are great for the nation.
We know better, we're LIVING this GOP Utopia ... debt, lost jobs, high costs, government corruption, unnecessary war ... but some iddy biddy tax cuts for you average Joes. Such a deal!
[a graph of Haliburton's profits from NO-BID contracts in the billions is an almost perfect match with the increase over the same time period of American Soldiers killed in Iraq.]
Though I usually detest Ridley as I view him than nothing more than an opportunist and centrist hack, I do like the fact he uses Media Matters as a source most of the time and brings up certain issues that have been highlighted on the site.
Thank God W plans to veto it. I'd vote for him again just based on that...dave
===============================================
To paraphrase a line from Billy Madison:
"That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read ... and everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
NOVAC IS A DINOSOUR.HIS STYLE IS SUSPECT AND HIS TRUST FACTOR IS DROPPING.