About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Tucker Carlson hosted all-white panel of journalists to discuss "Obama's blackness"

August 09, 2007 5:36 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

On the August 8 edition of MSNBC's Tucker, an all-white group discussed an upcoming forum at a National Association of Black Journalists convention that will address, according to the convention program -- as quoted by The Washington Post -- the question Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) "cannot seem to shake -- is he black enough? Is this an unfair question? What is the measure of blackness and who gets to decide?" Host Tucker Carlson asked A.B. Stoddard, associate editor of The Hill, and Newsweek senior editor Jonathan Alter: "What exactly do people mean when they talk about Obama's quote, "blackness"? ... I'm not even sure what that question means. I know that it makes me uncomfortable and it strikes me as unfair, but what does it mean?" Carlson, who is white, devoted a full segment of his show -- more than six minutes -- to the issue of Obama's racial identity and the effect of stereotypes on his bid for the presidency with Stoddard and Alter, two white journalists.

During the discussion, Stoddard said Obama "is biracial, and he's an immigrant, and he went to Harvard, and many black people in America don't see themselves in him." In fact, Obama, whose father was a native of Kenya, was born in Honolulu.

Later in the discussion, Carlson asserted that Obama "could just as easily identify as white" and added that "if he made that decision, the left would jump on him."

From the August 8 edition of MSNBC's Tucker:

CARLSON: It's a question that no other presidential candidate has had to face ever: Is he black enough? That question continues to nag Barack Obama's quest for the Democratic nomination.

This week, a meeting of the National Association of Black Journalists will confront the very topic. The conversation comes before Obama addresses that group on Friday. What exactly do people mean when they talk about Obama's quote, "blackness"? Is it a fair question? Is it an understandable reflection of American society, or is it a racist jab by its very existence?

Joining us again to discuss it, associate editor of The Hill A.B. Stoddard and Newsweek senior editor Jonathan Alter. A.B., I'm not even sure what that question means. I know that it makes me uncomfortable and it strikes me as unfair, but what does it mean?

STODDARD: I don't know that it's so offensive so much as it is unanswerable. I mean, it's -- Obama's blackness is an intangible. If he wins the nomination and wins the presidency, we will never know if he was black enough to be the first black president.

It's just one of those things that -- you look at [New Mexico Gov.] Bill Richardson [D]. He's not necessarily the dream candidate of the Latino community. [Sen.] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] is not the ultimate female candidate. [Former Sen.] John Edwards [D-NC], not the ultimate Southern candidate. Barack Obama is black when [Sen.] Joe Biden [D-DE] calls him clean-cut and articulate. He's black when he throws out those lines about hailing cabs in Manhattan.

At the same time, he is biracial, and he's an immigrant, and he went to Harvard, and many black people in America don't see themselves in him. It's just to me -- it's not that it can't be asked, but I don't think it can be answered.

CARLSON: Yeah, I think that's a fair point. I mean, I actually think it's an academic question, Jon. I think it's a fair question. I mean, there's -- no question is really an unfair question academically, but there's an implication behind it that I guess bothers me, that he isn't -- that there's something about the culture of achievement that he's been immersed in since he was young that is somehow not authentically black. And I think that implication is really corrosive.

ALTER: I agree with that. I don't like the question. It makes me uncomfortable, and I think it doesn't really contribute to the debate.

CARLSON: But wait, hold on. Have you noticed that he take takes more grief from black people than from anyone else?

ALTER: Well, actually that's --

CARLSON: The New York Times account of his years in the legislature, it wasn't Klansmen who were going after him, it was black legislators who were asking this exact question of him in an insulting way.

ALTER: But wait a minute. Wait a minute. It's very interesting what happened here in Illinois, where I am today. Initially, a lot of African-Americans in Chicago asked that question about him. He lost a race for the House in part because he wasn't seen as black enough in that congressional district. He lost to [Rep.] Bobby Rush [D-IL].

But then over time, he has amassed more and more African-American support, where now, it's got to be up in the 90s in Chicago among those who know him. In other words, there's really nobody among people who have gotten to know him well enough who asks that question about him anymore here. Maybe there are a few people, but it's not really a pertinent question.

It's mostly columnists and commentators in the rest of the country who are asking it, and some black folks who don't know him very well who are asking it. But I think the question is going to recede in importance as time goes on. And if he does go ahead and wins the nomination, which is still a distinct possibility, then the question will be, for a lot of people, an even more uncomfortable one and with much deeper roots in American history, which is, "Is he too black to be president?" And certain, you know, whites who could never in the past have imagined themselves voting for an African-American will be wrestling with that question in a general election.

CARLSON: Yeah, and I bet -- my instinct is a lot -- he will get a lot of white votes if he is, in fact, the nominee.

A.B. this raises the, I think, broader question of, you know, what does it mean to be a black American? I mean, there are thousands upon thousands of black immigrants from Africa to this country every year. They are black, but they share almost nothing in common with any American's culture, right? So I think the definition is changing in ways that we don't acknowledge. It's not 1967 anymore, it's 19 -- it's two-thou-- whatever. It's 40 years later.

STODDARD: Right.

STODDARD: Shouldn't we acknowledge that?

STODDARD: Yeah, and I just don't think that burden should fall on Barack Obama.

CARLSON: No!

STODDARD: That he's not African-American, but he's African, but he's American but, but, but. I mean, he's married to a black woman, he goes to a black church. And, as Jonathan said, there will come a time, if he's the nominee, about whether or not he's too black to be elected president.

[Revs.] Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson didn't get all the black votes when they ran. The Democratic contenders who were white who beat them did. Clearly, getting all the black votes -- which Obama, by the way, is gaining in that voting bloc on Hillary Clinton, and they're, I think, kind of neck to neck now. But, you know, does that mean that he's going to be the black candidate?

It's such a strange question, too, when you look at his candidacy, people say, "Do black people just want to vote for him because that will help them later, or do black people want to vote for him because they see themselves in him?" I mean, it's diff-- you know, those are two separate questions.

CARLSON: Right. It is --

STODDARD: And then when you get to, "Is he African or African-American or just American?" I mean, it's just ridiculous, really.

CARLSON: Well, it is ridiculous, and it would be -- Jonathan, we're almost out of time, but very quickly. Here's a guy whose mother was white, was raised by white people, went to predominantly white schools his whole life. He could just as easily identify as white, and if he did, people would flip out. They would not allow him to identify that way, which tells you something pretty upsetting about American society, in my view.

ALTER: Well, I think, as David Axelrod [Obama's senior media strategist] said, that's really about how society viewed him. He didn't have a lot of choice in that, as he wrote in his book.

CARLSON: Well, he should be allowed to make that decision, but if he made that decision, the left would jump on him.

ALTER: Yes, but that's not the society that we live in, Tucker. And his book is really interesting in the way he grapples with all of this.

Look, the key voting bloc in these primaries that hasn't gotten enough attention: African-American women, which way will they go?

CARLSON: Right. Hillary.

ALTER: Will they identify more with Hillary Clinton or with Barack Obama? It's too early to tell. Many are undecided. I talked to a number before the event last night in Chicago, the debate, and many of those African-American women were torn.

CARLSON: I bet that they go for Hillary, unfortunately. Coming up, we're just minutes away from the launch of the space shuttle Endeavour. We'll bring it to you live when we come back.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wzwriter (August 09, 2007 5:41 pm ET)
         

      Why didn't Tucker have that panel discuss his gayness????

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 5:43 pm ET)
         

      It's the National Association of Black Journalists that are bringing this up in their forum, Carlson isn't inventing this.  

      It should be a non-issue anyway, a complete irrelevancy - Obama's race.  Why are the journalists bringing it up at all?  I agree with Mrs. Obama, who is annoyed at this. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by neondesert (August 09, 2007 5:58 pm ET)
           

        I think it's a very fair question, "is he black enough?", actually.

        I mean, just look at Tiger Woods.  He wasn't black enough to play guard in the NBA, and had to resort to golf, and just look how well he's doing.  Obviously, they made the right choice there.

        Conversely, they made a wrong decision with Jesse Jackson who fell short enough of the black factor enough that he failed as a calypso singer.

        This is important stuff, as history is rife with examples of "lackness of blackness" causing major societal ills (Vanilla Ice, KC and the Sunshine band, etc.).

        Report Abuse
        • Author by lapsedlawyer (August 10, 2007 3:15 am ET)
             

          Minor point, I know, but I believe that was Farrakhan that was the failed calypso singer.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by neondesert (August 10, 2007 9:07 am ET)
               

            I stand corrected.

            That's precisely why I was not invited to be on the panel.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:12 pm ET)
           

        Thank You Tommy, it must be a media thing to take nothing and make a entire story around it. I know a whole lotta Black people and I have never once heard any of them ask if Obama is Black enough. We debated whether Obama's race would be an issue in running for president and the consensus was that anyone who would vote against someone because of their race probably wouldn't support any Democratic candidate given the Democrat’s historic stance over the last 40 odd years on issues of race. Guys like Tucker seem to be really really mad at Obama for choosing (I think the world chose for him) to identify as AA. I think their feelings are hurt. It might have been a good idea to have had an AA included on this panel, I have a feeling that Tucker did this intentionally since he’s said things in the past that was similar to something you once said to me when I first started posting here. You said that I thought only Blacks had the moral authority to speak on race issues. I told you that I didn’t believe that, but that we can bring a perspective to an issue about Black folks that maybe your wouldn’t have. I think this was I good example of what I was talking about.

         

          I think if he had an AA on Tucker may have been told about the strong bond among the African Diaspora and this includes mixed race folks. Were ever we lived we have had the  experience of overcoming slavery legal or de facto and fighting our way out of the relegation of second class citizenship, this includes all Blacks of the former European colonies on the continent of Africa and all of the countries where Europeans took Blacks to work as slaves. It’s the same kinship that I imagine the Jewish Diaspora feels even though they may have lived in different countries and spoke different languages they had a formidable shared experience just as we did.  It’s a very strong force. Obama spoke about this during his speech at the Selma church and the congregants knew exactly what he was talking about and responding enthusiastically, but I guess Tucker didn’t watch the speech.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Preston (August 09, 2007 10:23 pm ET)
             

          See, Lynn, this is why you’re my gurl because you be hittin’ it on the head all the time! This is EXACTLY why Carlson is irked about Obama: that this handsome, educated, wealthy, savvy politician dare identify with African-Americans, and not stick his nose up in the air by pointing to us and saying “I’m not one of them,” just irritates the hell out of bow-tie boy. Notice how he continues to bring up the fact that Obama’s father was an immigrant, so in essence, unlike blacks whose ancestors are traced back to the slaves, Obama’s pretty much like, well, white immigrants who came here, i.e., Italians, Jews, the Irish, Germans, etc. Carlson can’t understand why Obama with his background, credentials and success as a politician, would decide to be grouped in with us cantankerous, violent, lazy, welfare-dependant blacks who suffer from a “victimhood” complex. You know, we who refuse to use “personal responsibility” to achieve what they want outta life like a Horatio Alger character dipped in chocolate.

          But this is Carlson’s sophistic way of saying that Obama isn’t like those others who cause all the trouble and give whites a headache with our whining and moaning about racism. And then when Obama does act like those rowdy, race-obsessed bunch, Carlson and others of his ilk will accuse him of secretly galvanizing race riots, and following in the same direction as Sharpton and Jackson.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by scheduler (August 10, 2007 2:11 am ET)
             

          Lynn you are right on with your assessment.  

          Tucker Carlson has always ticked me off, as much as it bothers me there is no Caribbean-American, African-American, truly continental African, South American African, even a Canadian-African-American hosting a show on CNN or MSNBC to counter his ignorance. 

          I can't believe I am almost 40 and racism is stronger than ever, I mean how stupid, disgraceful, embarrassing in these times.  America is so backwards.  If she would have given the same love and admiration to black children coming up in black schools in America, we would have had a black president before 2008. 

           I am an American who is surprised, saddened, and laughing that such ignorant conversations are actually going on from the blacks or whites. 

           

          Integration proved to be a failure for native born poor African Americans, that were not middle class before integration. 

          Other African Diasporic Americans have capitalized more on the "Degree Factor" by going to get primary Read-Writing and Arithmetic skills from the Caribbean, African any country but America.  They come to America, go to college, are multi-lingual,living professional lives. 

          Obama is black because back in the days, if you had one drop of blood of black African in you, you were black. 

          You so nailed it on the head when you said Tucker feels sick to his stomach Barack Obama chose to call himself AA, over white in that he is now a graduate of the Ivy League, leading the Law Review at Harvard, can woo conservatives, be a hawk, a Senator.  He married a dark-skinned black woman, has two black daughters who he would probably like to see marry two black men.

          He beat the odds.  he married a "black" woman who is proud to be make-up less, strong willed, opinionated and herself.  

          You go Lynn! The funniest thing about his campaign is "real racism" is coming from everyone.  Hillary has issues.  Go to Arkansas!  

           Those that choose Obama, black, white, spanish, arab, yada, yada are progressives who want change that would have happened had JFK lived out his presidency.  After JFK, RFK was about to do it and was knocked out.

          I think the best ticket is OBAMA_EDWARDS for the country.  Obama will choose Colin Powell, other Dems, Repubs who will see the light and the country can change I believe.

           However if Hillary is elected, it will be Bush-Cheney Lite or possibly Bush-Cheney heavy! 

          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (August 09, 2007 5:47 pm ET)
         

      I have to agree with Jesse Jackson on this one. We have soldiers dying in an unnecessary, optional war every day. Haliburton is ripping off the taxpayers at a pace that makes the proverbial $400 hammer look like a bargain. We now cannot account for nearly 200,000 weapons "misplaced" in Iraq. We still cannot account for 9 billion dollars "misplaced" in Iraq. Our Attorney General is blatantly lying and thumbing his nose at Congress. Presidential aids are ignoring Congressional subpoenas.

      And these bloviating pussbags want to talk about how "black" one of the presidential candidates is? Is this the same "press" that the founding fathers felt compelled to protect in the First Amendment? Jesus H. Christ.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (August 09, 2007 5:49 pm ET)
         

      Another example of the wonderful MSNBC.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (August 09, 2007 5:49 pm ET)
         

      I've seen All Male panels discussing Hillary possibly becoming the first female President.

      But I didn't see any threads here about it...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 5:51 pm ET)
           

        Damn good point.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (August 09, 2007 5:57 pm ET)
             

          It seems to me this site, and many Liberals are the ones hung up on race.

          These bean-counting threads are rather silly.

          What's next? Can only Gay panels discuss Gay marriage?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by deeznuts (August 09, 2007 6:00 pm ET)
               

            Wrong again kids.

            Linky-linky 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (August 09, 2007 6:03 pm ET)
                 

              I stand corrected.

              And it's just as stupid then as this thread.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:04 pm ET)
                   

                I was going to say, and he is proud of that?!

                Report Abuse
              • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:20 pm ET)
                   

                I disagree with you passionately on this one Jeter, especially since the question posed seemed to be is Obama Black enough for Black people; I don’t think Stoddard and Alter were the best people to answer that hypothetical.  Read my post above to see why. 

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:26 pm ET)
                     

                  Lynn,

                  Then answer me this please?  If Stoddard and Alter are not the people to ask this question of, as you say, obviously because they aren't black.........then why is John Edwards the authority on poverty, when he isn't poor?  

                  Seems to me that you're saying you have to be like what you're opining on, or you don't have the proper credibility? 

                   

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by nomobush (August 09, 2007 6:30 pm ET)
                       

                    No, she's not saying that at all.

                    Try again.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Genghiz (August 09, 2007 8:35 pm ET)
                         

                      This is really a non-issue. Obama is half-Black and half-White. Is it more appropriate then to get a similar panel to discuss his race? Some liberals, the ideological descendants of Robert Byrd and George Wallace, are still hung up on race. What a pity in these times and this age!

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 1:16 am ET)
                           

                        What a dumb comment. First of all, George Wallace was no liberal. He was a white supremacist just like today's white conservatives. Now you prefer to conceal your racism. Secondly Obama is a Black man. Since whites enslaved the Black children they fathered by Black women from 1619-1865, your claim that they (the rich and famous ones, that is) are half white now is disingenuous.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 4:51 pm ET)
                             

                          Heru,

                           

                          I don't understand your comment. Obama's mother is white and his father is black. So he is multi-ethnic. Given the larger number of multi-ethnic children in this country things are considerably different than in the 19th century.  

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by BLR (August 10, 2007 5:46 pm ET)
                               

                            "I don't understand your comment."

                            I'll try to explain, as it seems you are not familiar with the "one drop" approach to blackness in the United States.  For decades, "one drop" of black blood in your heritage made you black.  You can search for the "One Drop Rule" in wikipedia, but here's a snippet, come from a book called The Passing of the Great Race, by Madison Grant: "The cross between a white man and an Indian is an Indian; the cross between a white man and a negro is a negro; the cross between a white man and a Hindu is a Hindu; and the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew."  The intent behind this is to consider the 'white race' much as one considers white pigment - once it's mixed with anything but white, it is forever tainted and you cannot move back from that.

                            I have to agree with Heru -- now that Barack has proven himself to be intelligent, well-read, well-spoken, well-dressed, handsome, commanding, rich, and statesmanly, the media clamors to claim his whiteness, very quick to throw out that one-drop rule, despite Barack's own seeming self-identity as a black man in America.

                            Furthermore, the only time it seems white media wants to embrace anyone of a mixed ethnicity as part-white, white, or anything inbetween is when they're rich and famous.  No matter how light their skin is, you are unlikely to ever find a media outlet that refers to a person of mixed ancestry as part-white, part-***** when they're talking about criminals.  The one drop rule still holds firm when referring to the unremarkable masses, but as soon as someone (e.g., Tiger Woods) who has black ancestry steps above the norm to show their talent and success, the media is exceptionally quick to point out just how black she or he is not.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 6:08 pm ET)
                                 

                              Incredible post! I agree with everything you said! I should also add if people want to read more about the "one-drop rule" they should pick up the book by sociologist F. James David entitled "Who Is Black?: One Nation's Definition."

                              Report Abuse
                            • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 6:35 pm ET)
                                 

                              I fully understand the "one drop rule". What I don't understand was why Heru is attempting to compare the rapist slave masters of the past with the media of today. America's multi-ethnic children are growing in numbers. It is about time that the pigeon holing of yesterday be removed. 100 years ago it may have been easy for people to talk about the "one drop rule" today it is not. I don't think it is fair to lump people who are asking these questions in with slave owners. 

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 6:46 pm ET)
                                   

                                But, H-Man, if we want to get rid of the “one drop role,” meaning erasing the conception of blackness in this country, then we also must, by the same token, deconstruct the meaning whiteness and erase that social construction as well. However, people aren’t willing to make that risk. One cannot happen without the other.

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by H-Man (August 12, 2007 10:28 am ET)
                                     

                                  I totally agree with you that we need to remove all of these conceptions. 

                                  Report Abuse
                        • Author by Genghiz (August 11, 2007 7:23 pm ET)
                             

                          What about Robert Byrd, Heru? I understand he is a big favorite of the MoveOn and Daily Chaos crowd.

                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by jscott (August 09, 2007 6:33 pm ET)
                       

                    In all fairness, he wasn't always wealthy.  These guys have never been black.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:35 pm ET)
                         

                      Oh, so what if you're a liberal born into wealth and have lived on easy street all your life, but you strike out on a poverty tour after you're a presidential candidate.  Then that would be the same thing as a white pundit opining on black issues, right?

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by nomobush (August 09, 2007 6:39 pm ET)
                           

                        It's not a white pundit opining on black issues.

                        It was an all white panel opining on whether Obama was black enough. As Lynn has said, it's not a "black" issue as to how black Obama is or is not.

                        Rich people can opine on poverty issues. Someone who has always been rich can never truly know what it's like to be dirt poor, but it's not necessary to know that it's like to be dirt poor to help people out of those dire situations.

                        Are you so delusional that you can't read now?

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:47 pm ET)
                           

                         Tommy, I hope you aren't intentionally misconstruing what we are saying here. We didn't say that Whites shouldn't have been on the show opining on Black issues. We are saying that had the panel included a Black person in the discussion a perspective that didn't get introduced would have been and maybe just maybe once and for all this very very stupid question about whether Barak Obama is Black enough for Black people could have been put to rest. You’re nemesis Jesse Jackson did an excellent job answering this on Hardball yesterday.  

                         

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:51 pm ET)
                             

                          Lynn,

                          What I agree with is that it is a stupid question and an irrelvant issue.  For the NABJ to be wasting their time on it is absurd.  Jesse Jackson is correct.  

                          Tucker was wasting his time discussing it, but he didn't bring the forum up in the first place......so why jump on him, and not the NABJ?.......we know why, MMFA doesn't like Tucker, and they wouldn't dare criticize the NABJ.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 1:19 am ET)
                               

                            The stupidity of your comment leaves me speechless.

                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by monknj80 (August 10, 2007 9:07 am ET)
                               

                            Tommy your wrong on this I've seen no less than 6 shows where Tucker has brought this issue up. He is intentionally trying to push the issue of whether he's black enugh, when in fact it's not a major factor at all in the black enough. There's no such thing as being Black enough. For Tucker to continuosly bring it up and try to make it an issue is underhanded and retarded.

                             

                            Let's not forget the other issues with Obama:

                            He calls his church racist.

                            He perpetuates the myth of Obama being raised in a Madrasa.

                            He's basically called him a wimpy punk time after time.

                            He claims Obama denies his white heritage.

                            When you add it all up Tuckers motivation to smear Obama is dubious at best. I'd love to see them in a one on one interview just to watch Tucker squirm.

                            Report Abuse
                  • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:39 pm ET)
                       

                    Tommy, Firstly John Edwards came from a humble background in a humble part of the country, but why are you are completely ignoring my point. Don't you think it’s funny that a very common concept in the Black community concerning the bond of Black Diaspora wasn't even discussed? It had a direct bearing on Tucker’s stupid question. I think Stoddard and Alter were probably unaware of this and they couldn't speak to this, but most people in the Black community are quite aware of it. Either Tucker didn't want to discuss the issue in its entirety, or he let his knee jerk anti PCism get in the way of good  journalism once again.  

                     

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by CaseySpring (August 09, 2007 6:41 pm ET)
                       

                    Tommy, you make a good point about Edwards. The man is so wealthy, yet he is the "Authority" on poverty.  To me he is the authority on "phony ex laywers".

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pete592 (August 09, 2007 6:52 pm ET)
                         

                      Was it Edwards who described himself as an "authority" on poverty?  Or is this another right-wing manufactured talking point? 

                      I know he's an advocate for impoverished people, but I don't see him as an authority on poverty, and I doubt he considers himself to be one.

                      Give us a link to his admission of poverty "authority" and I'll gladly STFU.  

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by CaseySpring (August 09, 2007 6:57 pm ET)
                           

                        His web site sure gives the impression he is an authority, maybe I am wrong, just my opinion and take on it. And we need someone to help get rid of poverty, I just believe someone with more credibility like Obama or Hillary will do it not Edwards.

                        http://johnedwards.com/issues/poverty/

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pete592 (August 09, 2007 10:27 pm ET)
                             

                          Ah, get put on the spot about your assertion and THEN it becomes a matter of opinion.

                          I see how it works now. 

                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by roundhouse (August 11, 2007 8:46 pm ET)
                             

                          Whatever, Casey.

                          This whole stupid, stupid rightwing assertion that Edwards doesn't know from poverty because he isn't poor is easily set on its head when one applies the same thinking to Warren Buffet. Buffet wasn't born rich, how on earth can he be an authority on making money? Same goes with Bill Gates.

                          Working to alleviate poverty and fighting for economic justice doesn't take street cred, you don't have to live it to know it anymore than you have be wealthy to become wealthy. Whether you're trying to get rich or help the working poor do better, all you have to do is work hard, do your homework and accomplish goals.

                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 7:12 pm ET)
                           

                        I agree ,Edwards is an advocate for impovershed people. Maybe Tommy thinks that Alter and Stoddard are advocates for Black people who don't like other Black people who aren't Black enough.

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Genghiz (August 09, 2007 8:40 pm ET)
                           

                        He considers himself enough of a "poverty authority" that he charges $50000 for one of his speeches on that topic. Pray, what are his credentials other than the fact that he created a few more bankruptcies through his advice and stewardship of Fortress Investments - one of the nation's largest predatory lenders?

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pete592 (August 09, 2007 10:31 pm ET)
                             

                          Charging that much for a speech when there was enough revenue in ticket sales from people willing to come and hear him speak on the subject to offset his fee?

                          Try some other talking points that haven't been long since debunked.

                          If you feel that spending one year as a consultant to Fortress Investments makes him a less worthy advocate for the impoverished than your favorite Republican, by all means, vote accordingly. 

                           

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by scheduler (August 10, 2007 2:22 am ET)
                               

                            Jesse Jackson charged $10,000 back in the late eighties for a speech.  $50,000 speaking fees are probably not unheard of.  Bill Clinton was getting $100,000 from a technology company as well as free flights on a chartered jet.  The corporate board is suing because Bill Clinton is not worth $100,000 speech, and the corporate jet fuel Hil and Bill used probably killed a few more Iraqis, as well as troops and Contractors.

                            Hillary is not the best candidate by any means.  I would choose Dodd over her anyway.  Obama is popular because he is fresh with ideas for change.  But Dodd, even Biden have more experience than Hillary, and would hopefully catapult forward if experienced voters wake up. 

                            Report Abuse
                • Author by jeter2 (August 09, 2007 6:50 pm ET)
                     

                   Lynn,

                  I wasn't commenting on whether the issue was a valid one. Whether Obama is Black enough seems to be media driven rather than coming directly from the African-American community. I personally believe it's a ludicrous question.

                  My beef was that MMFA seems to be concerned that Tucker & the two journalists were White.

                  I happened to leave work early yesterday & saw this program. Stoddard & Alter were Tucker's guests. They discussed other issues besides this one. It's not like these two White journalists were invited on the program only to discuss Obama.

                  Tucker often has a Black journalist from the Washington Post on [can't remember his name at the moment] and this subject has been brought up before when he was there.

                  My point though was that MMFA seems to be insinuating that this subject should not be discussed unless an African-American is part of the panel. Again, if this was the only topic Stoddard,Alter & Tucker discussed on yesterday's show, maybe they'd have a point, because an African-American's input would be interesting. Though as I posted earlier, are only Gay panelist allowed to discuss Gay issues? I find this type of bean-counting rather silly.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 1:30 am ET)
                       

                    MMFA is absolutely right. Asking a white guy about whether a Black man is Black enough is ridiculous. It is even more absurd to watch a white guy try to defend the ability of a white guy to opine on the subject while conceding that a Black perspective on the issue would be 'interesting' (but implicitly not definitive). ROFLMAO

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 5:06 pm ET)
                         

                      Heru,

                       

                      I'm sorry but Carlson (man I hate to defend him) in this particular segment. Was not asking if Obama is black enough. He was asking whether it was fair that the NABJ was having a forum with this as the topic. Carlson Tucker's other swipes at Obama aside. This is a valid question. I have no problem with White journalists discussing it because many ordinary white people will be discussing it themselves. 

                       

                      Personally, I am offended when anyone black asks if another person is black enough. Every time I hear it I call the person to task. There should be no litmus test for one's "blackness".  

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by BLR (August 10, 2007 5:50 pm ET)
                           

                        Carson certainly starts out on that topic, but it does quickly deteriorate into a question of whether or not he is black enough, and that discussion is held by a small panel of white guys.

                        If they wanted intelligent conversation that would also be topical, they could discuss why NABJ is asking the question, they could discuss the issues that make black americans feel as if they're not being represented, and how Obama's "blackness" applies to that sense of discomfort in the community.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 6:47 pm ET)
                             

                          I think you have a valid point that they really should have stayed on target about the NABJ. I also think Carlson was wrong about saying that Black people are giving Obama a harder time. There are plenty of people on the right who are taking stab at him because of his ethnic background. But I just don't really have a problem with white pundits asking the question of whether it is a good question. If they started by having a round table discussion of Obama's blackness then I could think differently about it. Now mind you the remarks saying that Obama is an immigrant are way off. But I think the initial question is valid.

                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 10, 2007 3:38 am ET)
                       

                    Jeter, what would Stoddard,Alter & Tucker know about being black? Has anyone of them EVER spent a day in their lives being black?. You can tell someone is black by looking at them, you cannot tell if someone is gay by looking at them!

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by dave (August 09, 2007 9:11 pm ET)
                     

                  So does this mean that only those of us who served in the military have any right to comment on military matters? Or those who pay the lion share of taxes can comment on that as well? I'm not black but I somehow feel that I have the right to comment on just about anything that is posted here.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (August 09, 2007 9:28 pm ET)
                       

                    You people are so disengenuous. Please its like an all BLIND Panel discussing the effects of the color red. Its not like people never in the military talking about military issues its like an entire panel none of whom had ever been in the military discussing the effects of being in the military on a family.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 1:35 am ET)
                         

                      Its a Black thing, Dave, you wouldn't understand.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 5:13 pm ET)
                         

                      Sometimes people are too close to a situation to effectively talk about it. Maybe an observer who has never been in the military would be the perfect person to discuss how that effects families. Since they are detached from the subject they may have a clearer view. Just because a person is not black does not mean they should not attempt to ask if another black person questioning another black person is a valid question. They may not understand the underlying emotions of the situation. But their analysis could still prove valid.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by heru (August 11, 2007 10:08 pm ET)
                           

                        If they do not understand the situation, the chance that their analysis of it would be valid is nil.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by H-Man (August 12, 2007 10:34 am ET)
                             

                          Heru,

                           

                          Sorry but I disagree with you. You do not have to have first hand experience with something to understand or analyze it. Like I stated before sometimes people who have not experienced something have an easier time analyzing a similar situation because they do not have preconceived thoughts on the situation. I guess we will just have to disagree on this one. 

                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 10:04 pm ET)
                       

                    You feel you have the appropriate knowledge and experience to offer an informed opinion on how Blacks feel about other  Blacks Blackness. Now maybe you are fully engaged with the Black community on a routine basis, or as Preston stated in his post further down the threAD maybe you have studied the history of the Black diaspora and your opinion is coming from a place of real knowledge of the subject. Is that it rich Dave?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by juliajayne (August 10, 2007 1:01 am ET)
                         

                      Obama identifies as black. That should be the end of the discussion. And it is stupid to have a bunch of white guys on this panel discussing the issue of blackness. That is patently obvious.

                      And I see the thread being derailed to talk about John Edwards and whether he was poor enough to tackle poverty issues? Please. That subject has been debated here ad nauseum. There's nobody buying that strawman. It's being used as a derailing device. Go cry somewhere else if you don't like Edwards.

                       

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tommy (August 10, 2007 11:39 am ET)
                           

                        Julia,

                        I brought up Edwards only as an analogy to those that say you must BE like those you opine on....that was it.

                        And people keep forgetting the National Association of Black Journalists are the ones that have decided this topic is worth their attention, yet most people here are giving them a pass and slamming Tucker for discussing it.  Just because the NABJ are black journalists, it still is an irrelevant and silly issue, and Mrs. Obama is correct in her annoyance......if they weren't bringing it up in their forum, there would be no disussion of it now.  Previous programs by Tucker are not relevant to this particular topic.

                        The beef is with the NABJ.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by nomobush (August 10, 2007 1:00 pm ET)
                             

                          I brought up Edwards only as an analogy to those that say you must BE like those you opine on....that was it.

                          No one did that. That's another strawman argument.

                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by juliajayne (August 10, 2007 4:35 pm ET)
                             

                          Tommy, your analogy stunk. Edwards having been of humble beginnings and having empathy for the poor is not analagous. His work on behalf of the poor speaks for itself.

                          If NABJ is the issue, why no blacks on the panel? 

                          Report Abuse
            • Author by nomobush (August 09, 2007 6:36 pm ET)
                 

              Jeter was wrong about no threads about it, and besides it was a strawman argument anyway.

              If there's a panel that tries to suggest that Hillary is not womanish enough or too masculine in some ways, that is covered. That would be the equivalent to what this panel did when discussing Obama.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:04 pm ET)
               

            Exactly Jeter,

            Unless it follows diversity and political correctness down to the absolute letter, it's misinformation.

            Ridiculous.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:23 pm ET)
                 

              You're doing that new jerk anti PC thing you sometimes do. If you want to know if Obama is Black enough for Black people wouldn't you want to pose that question to Black people? Duh!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:27 pm ET)
                   

                I believe the NABJ are doing just that.......knock their lights out if that is what they want to focus on. 

                Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:28 pm ET)
                   

                And as I said, if you want to know what poverty is like, then ask a victim of poverty, instead of a rich politician, right?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by nomobush (August 09, 2007 6:34 pm ET)
                     

                  If you want to know the effects of poverty, you would not ask a rich man to describe his own life.

                  But a rich man could certainly gather that information for himself and be an advocate for the poor, just like white people marched in the south to protest the plight of poor blacks decades ago. No white person will ever really know what it's like to be black, but they can gather the information to learn about it, and empathize with the people there so that they can then work to help them, just as Edwards has done.

                  Your vendetta against Edwards earns you no respect or credibility here, Tommy.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:40 pm ET)
                       

                    Thank you Sue, you just destroyed the myth that this panel's competence is in question solely because of their race.  

                    Did you know you just did that?  Or are you delusional?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by nomobush (August 09, 2007 6:43 pm ET)
                         

                      No, I did not.

                      Clear the delusions out of your head, and read what I said again. Do that two or three times, and you might lose the delusion that I'm someone I'm not too.

                      There's a big difference between talking about an issue and talking about the person. I know you have trouble grasping that concept, because we see it all the time when you attack the messenger rather than the message, but try really hard to take all your meds and maybe you can understand it.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by BLR (August 09, 2007 10:07 pm ET)
                         

                      No, she didn't.  If you're looking for equivalency, it would be the equivalent of a bunch of rich politicians sitting around a table talking about whether or not Edwards was ever poor enough to be a representative for the impoverished.

                      Oh, wait.  They do that too.  I guess your spokespeople DO have no shame.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 1:48 am ET)
                         

                      Thank you...you just destroyed the myth that this panel's competence is in question solely because of their race.  

                      Did you know you just did that?  Or are you delusional?

                      Tommy

                      ----------------------------

                      Its the inability of white supremacists to recognize their ignorance that got us into the Iraq war. I know its hard for white supremacists to take but no white person could ever define Blackness, even if the Caucasian had a PhD degree in African Studies. Imagine a panel of you, Jeter 2 and Dave telling us what it means to be Black HAHAHAHA ROFLMAO Ouch my sides hurt

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 12:48 pm ET)
                           

                        Heru, I think you're being inflammatory towards Tommy. Granted, I rarely if ever agree with Tommy on certain issues, but I don't view him as a white supremacist. He’s a Reaganite libertarian whose opinions will always be completely different than a liberal’s. But that’s unfair to label him a white supremacist because he’s trying to deflect attention from the real issue and lay it solely on NABJ. With all Tommy’s faults and flaws, I don’t think of him as a racist.  Furthermore, you’re wrong when you said that a white person with a PH.D in African American history shouldn’t speak on these issues. Some of the best historians and social scientist of African American history happened to be white, such as C. Vann Woodward, Gunnar Myrdal and Bob Blauner. There are many, many more white scholars who are as equally compelling with their work as their colleagues. In fact, when Tucker Carlson first started his show he use to invite sportswriter Max Kellerman on to debate issues, and whenever the issue of race arise, Kellerman debunked each and every one of Carlson’s retorts, even educating bow-tie boy on things about black history he was ignorant about. Therefore, I have no problem with a white man speaking about blackness, as long as they know what they’re talking about.    Accusing posters of being white supremacists will not get to the root cause of things, no matter how much of a contrarian Tommy is.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (August 10, 2007 2:47 pm ET)
                             

                          Thank you Preston, I appreciate that.  

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 4:56 pm ET)
                               

                            No problem, Tommy. Though I may disagree with many points you raise, I do respect people like you (and Jeter) because I view both of you as intelligent posters, regardless of your conservatism.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 8:04 pm ET)
                                 

                              1) I don't care what white institution gave a white man a degree in history. No Caucasian is competent to speak on the subject of Black identity period.

                              2) Although I'm sure white racists are gratified by your attempt to make a distinction between Reaganite conservatism and white supremacy, victims of white racism have no need to help whites conceal their sheets under shapeshifting political labels.

                               

                               

                              Report Abuse
                • Author by jscott (August 09, 2007 6:35 pm ET)
                     

                  Funny you should ask that, because that is one of the very things that Edwards has been doing the past few years.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:37 pm ET)
                       

                    Edwards has been living in poverty the past few years?  Wow, better tell that to his mansion staff in North Carolina, maybe their checks have bounced.

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by CaseySpring (August 09, 2007 6:46 pm ET)
                       

                    So Edwards has been living in poverty , meanwhile building that obsene mansion?

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by nomobush (August 09, 2007 6:49 pm ET)
                       

                    Edwards been asking victims of poverty relevant questions in order to help them, that's true.

                    Tommy's vendetta against Edwards makes him so delusional that he can't stand to admit that Edwards has done anything good.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:54 pm ET)
                         

                      Oh, Edwards has been asking questions?  Got it.

                      Did he make personal phone calls to poverty striken urban areas from his hotel suite and get them all on a conference call, or did he just send a staffer out there with a tape recorder?  

                      What a guy!

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by archfiend (August 09, 2007 7:16 pm ET)
                           

                        Tommy said: "Oh, Edwards has been asking questions? Got it.

                        Did he make personal phone calls to poverty striken urban areas from his hotel suite and get them all on a conference call, or did he just send a staffer out there with a tape recorder?

                        What a guy!"

                        Sometimes you can make sense and offer effective opposing arguments, Tommy. This is not one of those times.

                        Your original point aimed at knocking down Edwards was that a rich guy had no more business advocating for the poor than an all-white panel had discussing whether Obama was black enough for black people.

                        When it was pointed out the Edwards had not been born affluent, you ignored that bit of relevant history, as it was, quite clearly, inconvenient for you.

                        Instead, you chose to take the issue of research -- actually asking poor people about their lives in an effort to understand the issue better -- and try to pass it off as an ineffectual response to a serious problem.

                        What would you ask of a politician who sees poverty as a serious problem facing our nation? Would you insist that he take a vow of poverty before embarking on his quest? What would you say is the income level that disqualifies one from effectively advocating for the poor? And how the hell did they let that bastard FDR get away with it?

                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 10:24 pm ET)
                         

                      NOMO, Many times I've notice that many Conservatives simply attack the messenger when they bring forth an issue they don't want to talk about. I speculate that even if Edwards were a poor man many on the right would find some other reason to attack him. If the topics are poverty, uninsured, or other matters of social justice they usually will engage in a little messenger bashing. I think these topics are very uncomfortable for them to discuss. Unless your like my buddy rich Dave that is. He posted earlier today. Dave once said that he thought the Democrats had some very good proposals to deal with social issues; however Dave said he didn’t' want to pay for it with increased taxes. Dave also went on to say that he had more money than he could spend in a lifetime.  At least Dave was forthright and honest about it. He didn't bash the poor and the uninsured and he didn't called them lazy losers or anything, he just said he didn’t want to help them. Dave’s got a stiff backbone and a hard heart.  

                       

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by eweston8542983 (August 09, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
                     

                  I must have missed something down the line. What does experiencing poverty have to do with its mediation?

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by steeve (August 09, 2007 6:05 pm ET)
               

            It wouldn't hurt for a panel discussing gay marriage to have ONE gay on it.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (August 09, 2007 5:54 pm ET)
           

        you never will.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (August 09, 2007 5:58 pm ET)
           

        Well, maybe...but have they asked whether she's "female" enough to be the first woman president? It's one thing to discuss the fact that he would be the first black president, but the undercurrent of this discussion is that he's really an "Uncle Tom" or not a true "black man".

        Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (August 09, 2007 5:58 pm ET)
           

        And I've seen panels of intelligent, thinking people discussing what a useless idiot George W. Bush is.

        Your point?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (August 09, 2007 6:09 pm ET)
           

        Maybe that's because perceived racism is more objectional than percieved sexism.  Does nobody thinks it's funny to be asking white pundits if Obama is black enough?  Black enough for who?  And how would they know?

        Is the black caucus discussing whether of not Romney is white enough?

         

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:27 pm ET)
             

          Yes I'd like to see Tucker convene a panel of all Black pundits and ask them are any of the White candidates not White enough? BTW, let me go on record and say that as a Black person I think Romney is extremely White even though he's often photographed in that orange hued make-up.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by heru (August 11, 2007 10:12 pm ET)
               

            Romney is so white that he still has faith in a book that claims 'God' cursed us with black skin.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (August 09, 2007 6:21 pm ET)
           

        Jeter,

        I am not sure your analogy is on point here.  Were the male journalists discussing her femininity?  I think the strange part is white guys discussing blackness which would be similar to a bunch of guys discussing a woman's femininity.  Just my guess....

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (August 09, 2007 7:57 pm ET)
             

          Actually Fried one of the most recent All Male panels I've seen chatting about Hillary included a discussion of her cleavage & what giving us all a peek really meant.

          Dumb stuff like that ;-)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (August 10, 2007 12:49 pm ET)
               

            I know they have been discussing that (very funny post by the way), but they have not been focusing on her feminity, just her feminine parts!

            Report Abuse
      • Author by heru (August 10, 2007 1:01 am ET)
           

        I've seen All Male panels discussing Hillary possibly becoming the first female President.

        But I didn't see any threads here about it...

        Jeter 2

        -----------------------------------------

        What a stupid comparison. The issue isn't whether an all-white panel can discuss Obama's politics. The issue is whether they can judge his Blackness.

        If a group of males were convened to opine on Hilary's womanliness, your objection would still be dumb, but at least it would make more sense.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 10, 2007 3:28 am ET)
           

        Jeter if we lived in a color blind society your point  (about people hung up on race) would be valid however we live in the year 2007 and race still matters. No matter how much both you and I would like color not to matter it still does. That’s reality. Are liberals the only ones concerned about race? The GOP makes an effort (sarcasm) each time the election season rolls around to make the GOP “more attractive to black voters”. Junior trotted out Rice and Powell to black voters as an example of the GOP's "big tent". If race didn’t matter why bother? But they have no problem pulling the race card when they need to win (Willie Horton comes to mind). So it would seem that the GOP has no problem “playing” the race card when it suits them nor do they have no shame in pandering to blacks when they feel they need to. I guess it’s not a liberal hangup.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by michael.franco3237 (August 09, 2007 6:09 pm ET)
         

      I like the way he says everyone is asking if he is black enough?  Hey idiot you are the only one asking about it.  God, does anyone really watch this guy?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by michael.franco3237 (August 09, 2007 6:15 pm ET)
         

      Is it just white people that ask such stupid questions?  Are you going to ask next if his hair is kinky enough or if he enjoys watermelon or fried chicken?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (August 09, 2007 6:16 pm ET)
           

        Once again, the NABJ is hosting this forum and bringing up this issue.  Take your beef up with them on such a ridiculous irrelevancy.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (August 09, 2007 6:50 pm ET)
             

          And my question would be, why would they not want African Americans on the panel?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 6:55 pm ET)
             

          It is a ridiculous irrelevancy I don't care who is asking the question. If some news show host convened a panel consisting of Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, and me to discuss which White candidate we didn't think was White enough the host the show would be fired mid show. It's ridiculous. 

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by heru (August 11, 2007 10:15 pm ET)
               

            The implicit issue is whether Obama will serve Black interests. That's a legitimate question.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by aDifferent McCain (August 09, 2007 8:42 pm ET)
           

        Actually Michael I would like to know if Obama likes fried chicken, because I like fried chicken too and would only vote for a pro-fried chicken politician.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 09, 2007 7:48 pm ET)
         

      Man, I just love right wing logic:

      "I've seen All Male panels discussing Hillary possibly becoming the first female President.

      But I didn't see any threads here about it..."

      "Damn good point."

      No it's not a damn good point.

      Unless the all male panel was discussing whether Mrs. Clinton is WOMAN enough it wasn't even remotely comparable to an all white panel discussing whether Obama is BLACK enough.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by no1kstate (August 10, 2007 1:34 am ET)
           

        I agree. This right-wing attitude is annoying and seems racist, really.

        If you have a counterquestion, please, just ask. Don't block the issue.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by vicnlauranm120 (August 09, 2007 8:02 pm ET)
         

      Duh!  How dose an all white panel discuss the issues of a black democrtatic candidate on whether he is black enough.  Is this a joke? Are the kidding?  When will race stop being an issue particulary for a canidate to the highest political office in the US government.  Any republican who considers this a fair and balanced discussion should get his/her white robe and hood out to march on Washington again.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by artharvath3626 (August 09, 2007 8:21 pm ET)
         

      This so-called panel called Obama an immigrant.  I may be wrong, but don't you have to be a natural born citizen to be President?  If Obama is an immigrant, then he can't run for president. You would think Carlson and the other idiots would recognize that little detail.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (August 09, 2007 8:42 pm ET)
         

      The question really has nothing to do with skin color.

      You've heard Bill Clinton referred to as the first black president right?

      What the black journalists want to know is if Obama is the candidate who will best represent the interests of black Americans.

      The question might seem irrelevant to you but it might not if you're black American.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Preston (August 09, 2007 8:54 pm ET)
         

      At the same time, he is biracial, and he's an immigrant, and he went to Harvard, and many black people in America don't see themselves in him.

      Okay, maybe someone can help me out with this, but how is it difficult for black folks to see themselves in him because he went to Harvard, he's biracial and his dad was an immigrant? Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but what I'm gathering from Stoddard is that because Obama is the embodiment of the black bourgeoisification, this is somehow hard for black folks to see themselves in him? This is quite interesting if this is what Ms. Stoddard is implying, because as someone who was born and raised in poverty, some of my biggest heroes have been the black intelligentsia such as W.E.B. Dubois, Adam Harris, Jr., Oliver Cromwell Cox, E. Franklin Frazier, Ralph Bunche, James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison, Langston Hughes, Richard Wright and many others—all who left their mark before Obama entered the political arena. Why are these pundits acting as if Obama is some Grade-A Negro that transcends all who came before him because he’s biracial, went to Harvard, and biracial? Many of the scholars I’ve mentioned graduated from prestigious colleges, some were biracial, and some had parents who were immigrants. I ask again: why are pundits treating Obama as if he’s something that’s unique to the black community and to America as a whole? 

      This is precisely the reason why Tucker Carlson should have invited a black person (perhaps the always reliable Eugene Robinson) to counter such a statement like this, because so many people are under this impression that blacks are indifferent to Obama due to his Harvard education, his skin tone, his biracial physiognomy, his buppie sensibilities—as if black folks are only enamored by black urban youth culture, i.e., Hip Hop, and despise class and education. The point isn’t that an all-white panel shouldn’t discuss topics such as “blackness” pertaining to a presidential candidate; the point is that Carlson, Stoddard and Alter are ill-equipped and uninformed to dissect such a topic in a way to finally put this issue to rest with intelligence! Carlson, Stoddard nor Alter has shown any signs in the past that they’re knowledgeable about the African Diaspora. There are many intelligent white people who have studied black history extensively, to the point where some of them may know our history better than we do ourselves. Thus, the issue isn’t that white people shouldn’t be allowed to speak about “blackness,” it’s that neither of these three are the RIGHT people to speak substantively on this matter without sounding isolated and ignorant.

      Now I honestly don’t know why the National Association of Black Journalists is holding such a frivolous conference about this issue. But I’m not sure I can trust Carlson that this is the sole issue that the conference are dealing with, so I’m going to google around a bit and research about this matter. If this is about Obama’s “blackness”—and when I say that I mean focusing on such superficialities like being a son of an interracial couple, raised in Hawaii, Harvard graduate, etc.—then I will personally email NABJ and express how disappointed I am with them when they should be focusing their time and energy on other substantive matters. However, if this conference is about how in touch Obama is with the black community and issues that faces us on a daily basis, then I don’t see a problem with this, for “blackness” is not just skin color. To quote W.E.B. Dubois, “the black man is a person who must ride ‘Jim Crow’ in Georgia.” Meaning, “blackness” is a shared experience that connects all of us together as a group placed in a caste system.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Preston (August 09, 2007 8:59 pm ET)
           

        Ugh sorry for the bold, I don't know how that happened, but one more point I have to make:

        I really do hope that the media will stop dredging this issue up. I know when I talk about Obama with fellow black folk we’re talking about how his policies will build and enrich our communities. I’ve NEVER had a conversation with other blacks that he isn’t one of us because of his Harvard degree, his white mother and African father, and raised mostly in Hawaii. W.E.B. Dubois was also a Harvard graduate (in fact the first black man to graduate fro Harvard), with French and African in his ancestry, and was one of, if not THE, greatest sociologist America has ever produced, and we revere Dubois as much as we do Dr. King. I’m still trying to figure out where in the hell are these conservations about Obama’s blackness are coming from when me and my family and friends sure ain’t talking about Obama not being “one of us!”

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Lynn (August 09, 2007 9:46 pm ET)
             

          Eloquent as usual Preston. I too would like to know who are these people that keep asking is Obama Black enough. I sepculate this question is genrated by and confined to the media. I have not heard one soul in my world  question Obama's Blackness or upbringing. NONE

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Preston (August 09, 2007 10:50 pm ET)
               

            Same here Lynn. Now I debate with a lot of black folk, and not a single one of them—mostly who are supportive of Obama—dare raise the question if he’s “black enough?” I do know that black neo-conservative writer Stanley Crouch made the argument that Obama isn't "one of us," so has Debra Dickerson. But I guess because a few black journalists made such an argument they represent the entire black constituency. This is pretty typical of our media, especially with black folks. The media self-appoint spokesmen and spokeswomen for us when they’re too lazy to do the homework themselves, and somehow present these figures to the world by saying they hold all the knowledge and wisdom of the dark savages in America. Need understanding of blacks? Come listen to them!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 5:30 pm ET)
                 

              Preston,

               

              I would not call this a few black journalists. This is the National Association of Black Journalists. It is like the Black Caucus for journalists. For the life of me I don't know why they would even have a forum like this. I think it is beneath all black people and only give stupid talking points to the bigots of the world.  

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 5:50 pm ET)
                   

                I would not call this a few black journalists. This is the National Association of Black Journalists. It is like the Black Caucus for journalists. For the life of me I don't know why they would even have a forum like this. I think it is beneath all black people and only give stupid talking points to the bigots of the world.  

                H-Man, you’re missing my point. The point I was making is that the ones who got this Obama being "black enough" talking-point started was TWO black neo-conservative writers, Stanley Crouch and Deborah Dickerson, and because the media took it upon themselves to view this as a major issue within the black community, sensationalized this story as if all blacks are talking about Obama's "blackness." These are the "few" journalists I was referring to, not NABJ. Crouch and Dickerson are the two that said Obama’s not “one of us” because his father was an African immigrant rather than a black man whose ancestors can be traced back to the African slaves that arrived here in the 1600s.

                Furthermore, we're not even sure exactly how NABJ are approaching this topic. Carlson assumes that because the NABJ are asking about Obama's "blackness" he superficially thinks this is about Obama's biracialness with his father being an African immigrant. The point I’m making is that being biracial, whose parents are immigrants, never stopped blacks from accepting others like Obama as their own before, so why now? Moreover, this conference could be about how strong Obama's alliance is with the black community, and if he understands the problems that face many black people on a day-to-day basis. If this is the "blackness" that the NABJ are talking about, I see no problem with them raising this issue when it's a valid question.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by H-Man (August 10, 2007 7:07 pm ET)
                     

                  Preston,

                   

                  Here is the link.

                  [link to nabj.org] is from their brochure they are instigating this needless dribble. This has nothing to do with whether Obama is in touch with issues facing the Black community. This makes it appear that there is a question in the community at large. That is why I feel it is irresponsible for them to bring it up this way. After reading this why wouldn't the rest of America think that this is a question in the black community?

                  I don't think I missed your point. I think there is more talk (at least in the Black Media) than you realize.  

                   

                   

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 8:07 pm ET)
                       

                    Your link didn't work.

                    But if what you say is true then I will definitely express my concerns over this by sending them an email, addressing why I think this whole matter is extremely frivolous.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by H-Man (August 12, 2007 10:47 am ET)
                         

                      I tried adding the link again and the website keeps locking up. Just Google nabj and convention and it will take you to the website. Then there is a pdf for the schedule. Just go to Thursday and it is in the bottom left hand corner. I've already sent a letter explaining my feelings on the situation. 

                      Report Abuse
      • Author by no1kstate (August 10, 2007 1:16 am ET)
           

        I'm new to this site. Sorry for being so late.

        But, having quickly read through all these posts, I agree with Preston. The issue of whether or not Obama is black enough has more to do with his allegiance to the historical notion of the black community. Is he what some call "bi-cultural." I've had way too much of white people acting like they represent "achievement" even though they're not "racist."

        And if I'm repeating something that's already been said, sorry about that too. It's too late to think straight; just not to be sick of whatshisface who did the show.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Zhonni (August 09, 2007 9:02 pm ET)
         

      I think this post is making an issue out of a non-issue. Why should it matter whether they are white or black. If Obama was to get elected he would be America's President. I am sure people on BET or a group of black journalist discuss Bush, Cheney e.t.c. It makes no difference.  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (August 10, 2007 11:47 am ET)
           

        That's apples and oranges. Tucker's panel was framing Obama's race as a negative. You wouldn't see a panel on BET discussing whether or not Cheney was white enough to be vice president.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmaximus92640 (August 09, 2007 10:05 pm ET)
         

      Why would anybody hire this tool?  Didn't MSNBC see the John Sturart Cross Fire Episode?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 10, 2007 4:18 am ET)
         

      EXCELLENT POST AGAIN PRESTON P!

       

      Why are these pundits acting as if Obama is some Grade-A Negro that transcends all who came before him because he’s biracial, went to Harvard, and biracial?

      Because they are ignorant Preston. Plain and simple ignorance.

      I ask again: why are pundits treating Obama as if he’s something that’s unique to the black community and to America as a whole?

      Because to them he is unique. They (pundits) don’t look any further than their nose. They are not well read and have no insight into anything outside their preconceived stereotype as to what “black” people are.

      because so many people are under this impression that blacks are indifferent to Obama due to his Harvard education, his skin tone, his biracial physiognomy, his buppie sensibilities—as if black folks are only enamored by black urban youth culture, i.e., Hip Hop, and despise class and education.

      To people like Tucker and others they think that the fact that Obama is “biracial” matters to black people. They assume that “blacks” will feel different about Obama because he is “biracial”. They forget that “biracial” started a long time ago for black people. I keep using the word assume cause to assume means first a** out of you….. you know the rest.

      I’m still trying to figure out where in the hell are these conservations about Obama’s blackness are coming from when me and my family and friends sure ain’t talking about Obama not being “one of us

      It comes from people like Tucker. They try to be “politically correct” but they lack the ba**s to have an honest discussion regarding Obama. They fear that their own racial prejudices will appear and they don't want the label. I too Preston have discussed Obama with friend and family and NEVER has the discussion involved his education nor his biracial heritage. You can only be proud of Obama!

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 12:18 pm ET)
           

        Thank you, Pearl! I meant to tell you on the other thread that I'm a big fan of your posts as well as Lynn's. I agree with everything you just said, as usual. This topic about Obama being black enough just nags me because it's just another way of the media to reduce black politics into nothing more than a complete joke. And this is the media’s disingenuous way of saying that rather than black folks scrutinizing Obama’s policies regarding how some of his actions will build our impoverish communities, instead the media continues to replay this garbage about blacks being indifferent to Obama’s because of his biracialness and his father being an immigrant. It’s what Adolph Reed, Jr. calls “Black Politics Gone Haywire.”

        Report Abuse
        • Author by heru (August 11, 2007 10:32 pm ET)
             

          so many people are under this impression that blacks are indifferent to Obama due to his Harvard education, his skin tone, his biracial physiognomy, his buppie sensibilities—as if black folks are only enamored by black urban youth culture, i.e., Hip Hop, and despise class and education.

          Preston P

          -----------------------------------

          1. Carter G. Woodson once wrote that Harvard ruined Negroes...having said that, a Harvard education didn't successfully corrupt my Blackness.

          2. There is nothing about Obama's skin tone that places him outside of the complexion range of African Americans.

          3. If there is such a thing as biracial physiognomy, Obama doesn't have it. If we weren't told his mother was Caucasian, no one would have guessed it from his appearance.

          4. Hip Hop is not just youth culture, it is a post-modern expression of Black culture. The canons of Hip Hop are now in their 40s.

          5. Blacks do not despise education, we despise miseducation. Eurocentric schooling does not mean one is educated. If it is not resisted, it enslaves the mind.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (August 10, 2007 5:35 am ET)
         

      THE BLACK PANEL WENT AWAY WHEN THE IMUS AND THE RAPPERS STORY DIED DOWN LIKE THEY ALWAYS DO.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by traveler2559851 (August 10, 2007 9:01 am ET)
         

      So Tucker Carlson who can't dance shows the typical stereotypes of right wing pundit: Being a bad journalist with racist features. Conservatives can really be proud of this moron.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by monknj80 (August 10, 2007 9:30 am ET)
         

      Black journalists to Hillary Clinton: Are You Black Enough to Serve Black Voters?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 10, 2007 10:57 am ET)
         

      How about an all Black panel discussing why their weren't enough voting machines in precincts that were primarily African American?  Or why their votes were challenged, if they managed to avoid getting arbitrarily thrown off the voting rolls? 

      Now I would watch a show about that...otherwise avoid Carlson's show like the plague that it is.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Romario (August 10, 2007 11:30 am ET)
         

      Did I read that correctly? A.B. Stoddard said Senator Obama was an immigrant?

      WTF????

      Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (August 10, 2007 11:56 am ET)
           

        That's the same mindset that inspired George Allen to welcome the brown kid with the video camera to America. To these people, if you're not white, then you must be an immigrant. There's a line from The Good Shepherd that sums it up nicely. Joe Pesci asks Matt Damon what culture the white Protestants have to call their own, and Damon responds, "The United States...the rest of you are just visiting."

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Preston (August 10, 2007 1:06 pm ET)
             

          CC, I remember that scene and it was one of the best lines in the movie. Bravo for Bob DeNiro having the balls to deconstruct “whiteness,” even with a simple line like that. The great historians Matthew Frye Jacobson and David R. Roediger have written many books about creation of "whiteness" in America. I advise every American to read these books and learn more about this issue.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by byoung3rd (August 10, 2007 1:46 pm ET)
         

      jmaximus....Why would anybody hire this tool?   Have you forgotten why you visit media matters....the reason the msm hires fools like tucker carlson is that they are willing to carry water for the "landlords" of America.  We have to do everything in our power to reverse the damage done to our freedom of the press by the single stroke of the pen that allowed for monopolistic ownership of the media...and while we are at it, we need to do everything in our power to reform campaign financing so that everyone truly has only one vote.

      Report Abuse