About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Vieira on Coulter: "Of course we are" part of the problem, "[w]e're perpetuating it"

October 12, 2007 1:41 pm ET

Donny Deutsch appeared on NBC's Today to discuss Ann Coulter's comments on his show, in which she said "we" Christians "just want Jews to be perfected." Deutsch told Meredith Vieira that someone might ask, "Aren't we part of the problem?" Vieira responded: "Of course we are. We're perpetuating it."

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

CNBC host Donny Deutsch appeared on the October 12 edition of NBC's Today to discuss right-wing pundit Ann Coulter's appearance on the October 8 edition of his show, CNBC's The Big Idea, during which she said "we" Christians "just want Jews to be perfected." On Today, Deutsch said, "And I think that's what -- we're playing dangerous with words in our society that there's no accountability. There's a glibness that we in the media kind of elevate, and I'm here to kind of say I'm personally tired of it, and I think America is tired of it also." Deutsch later told Today co-host Meredith Vieira that someone might ask, "Aren't we part of the problem?" Vieira responded: "Of course we are. We're perpetuating it."

Deutsch also said of Coulter's comments: "I think the consumer's going to start to vote and I think you're going to see less of this stuff on television. If you really following, the things that are successful today, hate is going out."

Deutsch's comments on Today mark at least the fifth time an NBC, MSNBC, or CNBC host has expressed disapproval of Coulter's "harsh" and "nasty" statements, as Media Matters has documented. Hosts who have criticized Coulter include Vieira's co-host on Today, Matt Lauer, Tonight Show host Jay Leno, Nightly News anchor Brian Williams, and Hardball host Chris Matthews.

During the Today segment, Deutsch said of Coulter's appearance: "It's ironic she was on my show because our show, as you know, is about motivation and success stories. I pride that it's the only kind of positive night-time talk show." Deutsch stated: "I didn't even want -- we didn't even want to run this." However, Vieira noted, as Media Matters documented, that Coulter had appeared on Deutsch's show less than 18 months earlier and had also used inflammatory rhetoric: "Last year on your show, about Bill Clinton she said, 'I think that sort of rampant promiscuity does show some level of latent homosexuality.' " After noting two other controversial remarks by Coulter, Vieira told Deutsch: "This is her stock-in-trade. Talk about marketing."

From the October 12 edition of NBC's Today:

LAUER: Conservative commentator Ann Coulter is no stranger to controversy, and she's made big money by being outspoken, but some critics claim her comments this week on CNBC's The Big Idea with Donny Deutsch crossed a line. Are they right? You decide.

[video clip of Coulter's appearance on Deutsch's October 8 show]

VIEIRA: Donny Deutsch, good morning. Watching it again, your reaction?

DEUTSCH: I have to set the context up.

VIEIRA: OK:

DEUTSCH: It's very interesting. It's ironic she was on my show because our show, as you know, is about motivation and success stories. I pride that it's the only kind of positive night-time talk show.

VIEIRA: But you put her on.

DEUTSCH: It's an American Dream -- I put her on --actually my producer didn't want to -- to celebrate her business model. Like her or hate her, she has a very successfully business model. She goes to the extreme. She makes millions. Let's analyze the business model. So I didn't want to fight at all. I was like, "You know what? Enough of this nonsense."

VIEIRA: But this is part of her business model, isn't it? To be provocative.

DEUTSCH: OK, which, exactly -- she demonstrated. And frankly, in my old days, I would have started screaming. I guess to me -- I think we're at a moment in time. I think it's over. I think it's silly. I think we are creating between -- I want to link her and Britney Spears. It's very interesting. Britney Spears will crash her car again --

VIEIRA: [unintelligible] Yeah.

DEUTSCH: -- because until she does, she doesn't exist. Ann Coulter, without even realizing it -- I don't think she was doing that on purpose. She genuinely was like, "I'm sorry I offended you." But we're creating these critters in the media -- that she -- until she does that, she doesn't exist. And I want to hear somebody in the media to say, "It's kind of over. It's boring. It's silly." I think -- and I think the candidates need to follow this. I didn't -- we didn't service this. I didn't even want -- we didn't even want to run this. I think people are just tired of this nonsense.

VIEIRA: But what is it about this that crossed the line? Can we go down memory lane with Ann Coulter?

DEUTSCH: Sure. Yeah.

VIEIRA: Last year on your show, about Bill Clinton she said, "I think that sort of rampant promiscuity does show some level of latent homosexuality."

DEUTSCH: Right.

VIEIRA: Muslims: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, convert them to Christianity." On the 9-11 widows, she said among other things, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."

DEUTSCH: Right.

VIEIRA: This is her stock-in-trade. Talk about marketing.

DEUTSCH: There's -- exactly. Which -- and this -- she's a lounge act. The scary thing for me here was she wasn't doing it on purpose. She wasn't. And I think that's what -- we're playing dangerous with words in our society that there's no accountability. There's a glibness that we in the media kind of elevate, and I'm here to kind of say I'm personally tired of it, and I think America is tired of it also.

VIEIRA: So you're saying she should not be allowed on the air?

DEUTSCH: Oh, of course she should be allowed on the air. It's free speech. But I think the consumer's going to start to vote, and I think you're going to see less of this stuff on television. If you're really following the things that are successful today, hate is going out. People are seeing the stu-- when the producer is booking the show goes, "Oh, here we go again." People are just tired -- you're tired of it. I'm tired of it. And forget -- this is not an indictment on her. This is not a religious discussion. This, to me, is a moment in time where we kind of say, "Enough." Everybody in the studio is there watching, going, "Oh," yet we're talking about it. So you go, "Wait a second. Aren't we part of the problem?"

VIEIRA: Of course we are. We're perpetuating it.

DEUTSCH: But I'm going to raise my hand as one and say, "You know what? Over. Done. I don't care. It's not that interesting. It really isn't."

VIEIRA: All right, Donny Deutsch. Thanks very much.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (October 12, 2007 1:46 pm ET)
         

      Ann Coulter is given a platform to conduct her hate becuase these networks want her to say something outrageous, it helps them with ratings and publicity. Donny Deutsch is in my opinion a phony. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by chin music (October 12, 2007 3:05 pm ET)
           

        Deutsch is right about coulter having a "successful business model".  She (it?) is very successful, (in a monetary way), thanks to Deutsch, NBC and all the other media outlets that constantly provide her with free, nationwide marketing.  I could sell ice to Eskimos with that kind of help.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Intergalatic Purveyor (October 13, 2007 1:48 am ET)
             

          Deutsch and all the rest are part of the problem and will comment on it and yet they still bring this woman on to spew what are essentially fascist, right wing points of view. 

          Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (October 12, 2007 1:47 pm ET)
         

      Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (October 12, 2007 2:13 pm ET)
         

      These phony media personalities.  They get down and dirty with Ann by having her on their shows knowing full well she is a lightning rod and will probably say something offensive, on purpose, that makes headlines the next day......and then they try and clean themselves up by opining on the correctness of what she said.

      Just as everyone should, if she's ignored and not given airtime, whatever stature or relevance she has to anything diminishes. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 12, 2007 2:51 pm ET)
           

        "These phony media personalities.  They get down and dirty with Ann by having her on their shows knowing full well she is a lightning rod and will probably say something offensive, on purpose, that makes headlines the next day......and then they try and clean themselves up "

        You're right, Tommy.  Notice he had her on his show to "celebrate her business model."  Her business model is the outrageous, ad hominem, attack.  It's only when she slipped, and said something from the heart, that he got upset, because it denigrated a group to which he belongs.  All of a sudden he sees the danger in her calculated hysteria, because it's aimed at him.  On that previous show (coincidentally, the only one of his I've ever seen), he gave token opposition to her anti-liberal libels by opining that there are actually no liberals left, really.  Not a word about the hatefulness of her expressions, no hint of "accountability."

        Now, as he sees it, hate has run its course as a business model, and we should move on to something else.  Beautiful.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (October 12, 2007 2:59 pm ET)
             

          And Ann is laughing all the way to the publicity bank, or the real bank perhaps.  Now she is the topic during a discussion right when she is looking for more exposure for book sales - she can just sit home and watch this.....it happens every time she pimps a book.  The woman is a calculating genius when it comes to getting her name out there in a very crowded field of book peddlers.

          She has no interest in who she offends, that has been proven over and over......her only interest is self promotion, and she does it brilliantly.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by spooky3 (October 12, 2007 10:23 pm ET)
               

            Well, I'm not sure if she deserves credit for brilliance. If she behaved exactly the same way but looked like (forgive me for picking on someone 's looks to make the point) Ari Fleischer or Michael Moore, I don't think that she'd get any invitations to appear on TV, and I don't think people like Bill Maher would find her so interesting.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by spooky3 (October 12, 2007 10:12 pm ET)
             

          Exactly. When Donny gets equally indignant about her attacks on him or on people who are not in his group, and refuses to allow lies-for-pay to be promoted on his own show for his own benefit, that will be the first step toward gaining credibility and integrity for him. As for her, she's beyond ever attaining either. If she really is a Christian, she knows she has to make a lot of changes to go to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. She can begin by not taking money for her horrid behavior.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (October 12, 2007 3:14 pm ET)
           

        They get down and dirty with Ann by having her on their shows knowing full well she is a lightning rod and will probably say something offensive, on purpose, that makes headlines the next day......and then they try and clean themselves up by opining on the correctness of what she said.

        Bingo!

        Tommy, this is repeated daily especially by the MSM who try to appear above the fray even if they are the ones that help the original controversy catch fire.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by bruce1ace (October 12, 2007 2:16 pm ET)
         

      Savage was "savaging" Coulter last night on his radio show too.  Wonder if MMFA will report that?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (October 12, 2007 2:18 pm ET)
           

        The enemy of my enemy is my friend?  Nah.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bruce1ace (October 12, 2007 2:25 pm ET)
             

          I agree.  But if they do maybe I can be a MMFA "tipster" like Jeter2???

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (October 12, 2007 2:40 pm ET)
               

            I'll put in a good word for ya with David ;-)

            Report Abuse
          • Author by greekfurnace (October 12, 2007 2:46 pm ET)
               

            I guess I understand your need (?) I don't know... Personally, I think you guys - over time - have fabricated this requirement that MMFA report everything (good or bad) the right wing 'punditry' says... Is this the point of this site??

            But, maybe you're right... MMFA prob should highlight 'in-fighting' among these lying idiots.  That would satisfy me.  Savage and Coulter are just about equal in my mind. Coulter prob has more money.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by interestingobserver (October 12, 2007 4:44 pm ET)
                 

              Greekfurnace, correct me if I'm wrong but weren't you the one who once argued that Savage is actually a liberal in disguise? That he is really all in act?  I'm pretty sure it was you, but I could be mistaken. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Eddy3957 (October 12, 2007 5:20 pm ET)
                   

                Savage is a hybrid.  He's part human and part show biz righty.  He panders to the right from the left side of the street, let me put it that way.  That's all.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by greekfurnace (October 12, 2007 6:54 pm ET)
                   

                Not me, man... that's someone else. I've said that Savage is a latent homosexual... He once associated himself with liberals (Ginsberg, et al)... In my mind, he's a confused shill. But, he's no 'liberal'.

                Report Abuse
      • Author by JLyons (October 12, 2007 2:22 pm ET)
           

        No Bruce Savage rips apart OReilly also and Rush and Bush. But he is a hater.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Pithaughn (October 12, 2007 2:22 pm ET)
           

        yawn.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by SFnomad (October 12, 2007 2:24 pm ET)
           

        Why would MMFA report on Savage going after Mannthrax Coulter?  It wouldn't be a case of conservative mis-information, but rather a conservative actually speaking the truth.  On second thought, since that happens so rarely, you might be right, it would be newsworthy.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by skeptical (October 12, 2007 2:26 pm ET)
           

        Bruce,

        What exactly would they be reporting. 

        Is there some conservative misinformation in what Savage says about Coulter?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (October 12, 2007 2:30 pm ET)
             

          What conservative misinformation is there is Viera saying that "they perpetuate it"?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (October 12, 2007 9:15 pm ET)
               

            None, this is sort of like when KO(D) awards his Worse, Worser, Worst to someone that saw the light of day on MMFA. Self Congratulations would probably be the best way to describe it.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (October 12, 2007 5:26 pm ET)
           

        Was he misinforming?

        No?

        Then, no, MMFA probably won't report it. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 12, 2007 2:29 pm ET)
         

      Why do we even label this snake a " conservative commentator " ? wearing a short dress and showing crotchflashes  is not my view of " conservatives ".Couple that with her  hate speech condemning an entire population being less than her, makes for a very sick person. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Juan Martinez (October 12, 2007 2:31 pm ET)
         

      It's about time hate is going out. I hope she's gets what she deserves: No more air time from anybody.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (October 12, 2007 2:32 pm ET)
         

      Speaking of "hate"...

      As part of his excuse for booking her, Deutsch said "Like her or hate her, she has a very successfully business model."

      So did Hitler.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dave_chicago (October 12, 2007 2:40 pm ET)
         

      "Everybody in the studio is there watching, going, "Oh," yet we're talking about it. So you go, "Wait a second. Aren't we part of the problem?"

      In a word, duh. 

      These people are not even that dense. It's much worse. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 12, 2007 2:49 pm ET)
           

        The real problem is Ann Coulter.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dave_chicago (October 12, 2007 3:44 pm ET)
             

          Sure. But she can't appear on or in the media without an invitation from the media. So, as Deutsch said, the media is part of the problem.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by JLyons (October 12, 2007 3:08 pm ET)
         

      Noro is the perfect example of how someone just derailed the topic. Sigh.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 12, 2007 3:13 pm ET)
           

        "Dually".........maybe he meant " duly " ? could be referring to the importance of Ann Coulter in the bigger scheme of things.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (October 12, 2007 3:14 pm ET)
           

        True jlyons. Completely derailed like the good troll he is. Mostly about the Weinerdog and HIM almost nothing about the hag Coulter or that some commentators are starting to catch on that putting her on is part of the problem

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Isthisagreatcountryorwhat (October 12, 2007 3:15 pm ET)
         

      Oh my, Ann made a really horrible comment.  Let's bring her on the show and ask her questions about it, and then talk about it for five days on every network and radio station in America.  Coulter plays all these networks better than Itzhak Perlman plays the violin.  Isn't that ironic?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (October 12, 2007 3:28 pm ET)
           

        Exactly. Which was Viera's point

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (October 12, 2007 3:48 pm ET)
           

        They're shocked--shocked! that gambling's going on, as they collect their winnings (controversy, ratings & ad dollar$).

        Report Abuse
    • Author by billiybobjones7678 (October 12, 2007 5:12 pm ET)
         

      "Aren't we part of the problem?" Vieira

      Yes, Viera.  You are part of the larger liberal media problem.  I'm glad you are finally starting to realize it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (October 13, 2007 9:13 pm ET)
           

        There is no such thing. Reality is not defined by your delusions. The media is NOT liberal. No matter how often you CHANT it is that wont change anything. Notice Annie Gangleskank is all over the media. Since she has ZERO expertise, is a lair and hatemonger why would a liberal media let her within a MILE of their buildings?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (October 12, 2007 6:57 pm ET)
         

      "Aren't we part of the problem?" Vieira

      Yes, the corproate media that caters to the Coulters of the world is the problem, as is Ann Coulter herself.

      Meredith, Donny and such

      Are really too out of touch

      If they think Annie C

      Would be a celebrity

      Since they offer their forum so much

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Conchobhar (October 12, 2007 7:17 pm ET)
         

      A lot of comments have been pulled.  Any idea why?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (October 13, 2007 7:07 pm ET)
           

        The thread was being derailed by Norotor. I personally would rather not have to plow through all the nonesense. When I see a thread with every other poster being Tommy or Norotor or the like, I usually will just ignore it and scroll down. Norotor was being a trollish pendejo from what I saw.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 12, 2007 7:45 pm ET)
         

      I noticed a few of Norotors and solon's are missing. N was pulling chains with great vigor. I got one pulled because I spelled t*t for tat near as I can figure that was why.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 13, 2007 12:58 pm ET)
           

        Exactly.  It was a food-fight, harmless and kind of fun.  I was sorry to see it taken down, not least because I lobbed in a couple of (I thought) plums myself.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by plooger (October 13, 2007 9:07 am ET)
         

      Regarding Deutsch's comment...

      > DEUTSCH: ... If you're really following the things that are successful today, hate is going out.

      So propagating "hate" is OK, so long as it helps the networks turn a profit.  Great ethics, Don.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ellen (October 13, 2007 6:04 pm ET)
         

      Hopefully he means he's through with it.  I'd love to see people on the air who talk about actual facts.  I'm tired of opinions on "news" shows.  Unfortunately most people in the great ol' USofA can't tell the difference between facts and opinions and aren't inclined to distinguish between the two.  Bring back the Fairness Doctrine. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jumboburrito (October 14, 2007 2:03 pm ET)
         

      Deutsch is wrong. Declinig to provide Anne Coulter a media megaphone to practice her "business model" is not a free speech issue. No one is stopping Coulter from having Merllon Scaife fund her books or from mounting a soapbox in Central Park.

      National Review  kicked Coulter off their pages. The networks can do it too.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cokids (October 14, 2007 8:23 pm ET)
         

      Yup, Little Annie has the right to say anything she wants, but no one said that she deserved the right to voice her opinions on the airwaves that belong to all of us (theoretically anyway)! Take that woman off the air and put her back in her bottle! Rub her belly; rub her head, but rub her off the air!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by vapaday (October 15, 2007 10:44 am ET)
         

      Ann Coulter is a racist thug, and her comments denigrating any racial or ethnic group should be condemned by all. However, it is curious that when she made disparaging comments about Hispanics, Asians and Muslims, there was a pregnant silence from the media. The media should employ its outrage equally, not just because she made nasty and despicable comments about Jews.

      Report Abuse