About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Cavuto: Clinton "trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image"

February 19, 2008 4:04 pm ET

While discussing Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign strategy for the March 4 Democratic primary in Texas, Neil Cavuto said of Clinton: "[S]he's trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

On the February 18 edition of Fox Business News' Cavuto, during a discussion about Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign strategy for the March 4 Democratic primary in Texas, Republican strategist Frank Guerra asserted that "tough-as-nails ladies" are elected to office in Texas and said, "I think that Hillary Clinton really needs to be tough in this race in the next two weeks, and she needs to be very definitive about her positions because she needs to draw a sharp contrast between where she is and where people are still not sure about where [Sen.] Barack Obama is." Host Neil Cavuto responded, "But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she's trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn't that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama?"

As Media Matters for America documented, during the March 15, 2007, broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Glenn Beck said of Clinton, "[S]he's the stereotypical bitch, you know what I mean?" Also, defending Sen. John McCain over his failure to denounce the reference by a campaign event audience member to Clinton as a "bitch," Politico chief political correspondent Mike Allen said, "All right. But what Republican voter hasn't thought that? What voter in general hasn't thought that?" Politico chief political columnist Roger Simon began his November 16 column by asserting, "The (rhymes with rich) is back."

From the February 18 edition of Fox Business News' Cavuto:

CAVUTO: So if you're doing ads, real quickly, if you're doing ads, Frank, and she's known as these get-in-the-face ads, saying that Barack Obama is afraid to debate her and all of that. He calls them attack ads. They don't seem like very attacking ads to me. But nevertheless, does she need to do more of that or what?

GUERRA: Oh, absolutely. I think so far, some of the ads that I've seen here in Texas have been sort of soft and lovely. They're very good ads. But I think she really needs to be tough here in Texas.

Keep in mind the kind of women that we elect to office here in Texas. On the Democratic side, let me just say two words: Ann Richards. I still picture her on her Harley with her leather jacket. You look at Kay Bailey Hutchison, you know, our U.S. senator. You look at some of the state senators like Judith Zaffirini and Leticia Van de Putte. I'm telling you, those are tough-as-nails ladies.

And I think that Hillary Clinton really needs to be tough in this race in the next two weeks, and she needs to be very definitive about her positions because she needs to draw a sharp contrast between where she is and where people are still not sure about where Barack Obama is.

CAVUTO: But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she's trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn't that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama? In other words, isn't she between kind of like a rock and a hard place?

GUERRA: I don't think so, because remember, because we've been out of the race for so long, we're ready for a fight. We really want to see something. We're almost like Missouri number two, you know, "Show Me." So I think she needs to demand that of Barack Obama in this race.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wzwriter (February 19, 2008 4:06 pm ET)
         
      Just like Neil Cavuto runs away from the truth...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 4:16 pm ET)
           

        Looks like she has 2 options, according to Cavuto- Embrace the tough, bltchy image, or "run away".

        Both very appealing.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (February 19, 2008 4:15 pm ET)
         
      MMfA is having a terrible day. MMfA slays media outlets for cropping quotes, yet they did just that in this instance. Their quote of Cavuto is misleading and a straight-up misquote: they put a period and ended a sentence that in reality went on for another whole phrase. Not good.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 4:22 pm ET)
           

        Dex, there is an errant period in the bold section below the headline. No period in the headline, the entire quote printed two more times, and a video clip.I think you're trying pretty hard to find some sort of sinister attempt to mis-quote on the part of MMFA.

        But I sometimes blame my bad days on others too. ;0)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dexteritas0071418 (February 19, 2008 4:38 pm ET)
             

          Full, in-context quote:

          But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she's trying to run away from this tough, kind of b*tchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn't that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama?

          Cropped, misleading piece of libel:

          "[S]he's trying to run away from this tough, kind of b*tchy image."

          Colonel KFC, the reason this is bad is because it is exactly, precisely the kind of thing that MMfA rails against when it comes out of rightie pundits' mouths. It's not ok for Rushbo to crop quotes and restate out of context, and neither is it ok for MMfA to do the same.

          I'm having a great day..how do you like your job as a professional apologist?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by bittermarv (February 19, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
               
            That is interesting!  Can you provide a link to where you got the exact quote from?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 5:01 pm ET)
                 

              Yeah, Marv! I wanna go to that site, where the entire quote is provided, maybe two or three times.Why, a site like that might even post a video clip, in addition to everything else!

              Heh. But then, I'm just an apologist. I'm not sure for whom, but the Cavuto apologist said it, so it must be true.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (February 19, 2008 5:07 pm ET)
                   

                Apparently you're happy with sloppy headlines here, but some of us would rather that a media watchdog site watch and report more carefully.

                Cavuto; Critics claim Clinton "trying to run away from this tough, kind of bit@hy image.........."

                (was that so hard now Colonel?) 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
                     

                  No, Tommy, that was easy. By putting quotation marks around the words, you make it appear as if Cavuto was quoting some actual critics.Unfortunately, he's not quoting anyone, so the new and improved more"accurate" headline you propose is an outright lie, as opposed to MMFA's, which you feel doesn't include everything you want it to.

                  That wasn't so hard at all.In fact, it looks like you didn't even really think it through.

                   

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (February 19, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
                       

                    Apparently I am not as happy with media watchdog shoddiness as you are, and you just accused me of enabling media inferiorness, when it's actually you who keeps your little MMFA apologist bag handy.

                    Well done. 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 5:41 pm ET)
                         

                      OK, this has been fun, Tommy-Bltch, but now I have to assume you're just being thick for kicks.

                      I'll drop it, but if you want to come out looking good with something besides empty accusations against me being an apologist, all you've got to do is cite a source for the "quote" in your new, non-shoddy, suggested headline.

                      Name the source of that quote, I'll apologize, and recognize your sterling standards for media accuracy. (tee-hee)

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tommy (February 19, 2008 5:53 pm ET)
                           

                        So you're claiming that none of Hillary's critics have ever thought she was of that image?  You want a link to that??

                        okkkkkkkkkkk..... 

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 6:06 pm ET)
                             
                          Nice job, Tommy.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by tommy (February 19, 2008 6:13 pm ET)
                               

                            Cute Colonel, but Cavuto said her "critics"; and then you somehow act all ignorant and coy, essentially saying "ahh, what critics"???

                            Perhaps you've been hanging out in that cornfield photographing straw scarecrows lately, otherwise you wouldn't have to ask. 

                            Report Abuse
                  • Author by mari2j (February 20, 2008 1:14 am ET)
                       
                    Actually Cavoto had no source of the comment.  Nope, not one   That is Cavuto's problem.  He put the quotes around his own statement that others supposedly made, and Cavuto did not source the quote to anyone who had made the statement in question.  A classic example of hustle and retrench by the Cavoto apologists.  Or perhaps this guy can rustle up the quote AND source that Cavuto was speaking to.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by dexteritas0071418 (February 19, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
                   
                You guys are funny. I simply pasted the full quote that MMfA had the audacity to post, after cropping it for the subheadline. Did you read the article too?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 5:43 pm ET)
                     

                  "You guys are funny"

                  You should see it from the non-butt end of the joke. Hi-larious!

                  Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (February 19, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
           

        You are correct Dex, MMFA is implying through its headline, and in the summary, that Cavuto himself is editorializing his image of Hillary.....when in fact it is her critics that he is talking about.

        But accuracy and fairness isn't as much fun as skewering a Fox-er with far more inflammatory vagueness.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (February 19, 2008 5:07 pm ET)
             
          Cavuto is indeed editorializing his image of Hillary.  Which one of her critics has called her tough and bıtchy?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 19, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
             

          Tommy, you're having as bad a day as Dex.Even if you're distracted by Cavuto's attributing his own thoughts to "Hillary's critics", you've got to see that he's setting up two equally undesirable characterizations of HC. He's using the "rock and a hard place" phrase to make it appear that he's sympathizing with her, when he's the one who's trying to put her there.

          HRC's choices, according to Cavuto;

          A. Be tough, and be perceived as bltchy

          B. "Run away" from the bltchy image

          A b*tch, or a cut & runner.Do you think those are realistically the only options?

          If you post here, and take a tough stance in a discussion, do you think it's reasonable to refer to you as a bltch?

          If you object to being called that, would you describe yourself as "running away from your bltchy image?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (February 19, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
               
            Col, In case you haven't noticed, I run directly head-on into that image.  It's many of you here that are so freaked out over silly media labels, like McCain's "Maverick", or Giuliani's "America's Mayor".
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2j (February 20, 2008 1:24 am ET)
             
          If that is a factual statement,  please supply the source that Cavuto failed to credit for those statement from his supposed MANY-statement-givers in quoted.  That looked like Cavuto quoted some actual, living, red-blooded individuals.  If so, the problem is truly Cavuto's.  He is to blame for no attribution tand if it had been included in his rant, that would have made his statement factual.  As it is, looks like a run of the mill Cavuto hit job he attributed to others without the sourcing.  Par for Cavuto and Fox to be sure.  I note the person's he is quoting are obviously absent.   
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bruce1ace (February 19, 2008 7:05 pm ET)
           
        I agree with you Dex.  MMFA created a sensationalistic headline that should be beneath them.  I'm surprised the left-leaning regulars are giving them a pass on it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 19, 2008 4:20 pm ET)
         

      "...kind of b*tchy image that her critics claim that she has..."

      Uh, Neil...don't you mean the "b*tchy image" that her critics have created? Any politician, male or female, has to be tough. But b*tchy...? Where does that come from? Other than Frank Morris, most people who know Hillary Clinton say she is a pretty nice person.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dexteritas0071418 (February 19, 2008 4:39 pm ET)
           
        Irony, really? I'm not saying it's ok at all to refer to her as a b*tch, but have you read anything on DailyKos or HuffPost about her, written by an Obama supporter? Much worse has been said.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bittermarv (February 19, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
             
          And that has what  to do with this?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by edenscape246494 (February 19, 2008 5:30 pm ET)
               
            Nothing of course, just more look that way from the derail crowd
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dexteritas0071418 (February 19, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
               
            Bitter, stop being so bitter. My point to Irony was only that Hillary is bearing the brunt of insults from all kinds of different people, not just "Frank Morris." Easy tiger.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (February 19, 2008 6:54 pm ET)
             
          Dex, read what I said again...  My understanding is that most people who know Hillary Clinton, not including Frank Morris, think she's a good person. Hillary Clinton strikes me as tough, which should be a desirable trait for a President. My gripe is her "critics" referring to her as a "b*tch". If it is desirable for a male candidate to be tough why is a woman candidate called a "b*tch" for being tough? That's not fair. It strikes me as the use of a negative stereotype by her critics that is exclusive to women. Rush Limbaugh harps on her for not being "soft and cuddly". What? Do we want a soft and cuddly President? I don't think so. And just for the record, I am not, for various reasons, a big fan of Hillary Clinton, although she would IMO make a much better President than John McCain.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (February 19, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
         
      I am not using profanity in the least bit, but the filter says I am.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (February 19, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
           
        It's pretty hard to run away from an image created by the legions of the right-wing slime machine.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (February 19, 2008 4:50 pm ET)
         

      The media has created the image of Hillary the B#tch, McCain the Maverick & Obama the Messiah.

      Hillary was stuck with the only negative image.

      Yeah Neil she is between a rock & a hard place....thanks to folks like you.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (February 19, 2008 5:11 pm ET)
           
        What garbage.  Hilliary earned that reputation all on her own.  NC asked a legitimate strategy question.  Where is the Miss-info in what he said?  He did not call her name, he asked a question.  If you want to be president, and you can not handle that, then you need to drop out. 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (February 19, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
             

          What garbage.  Hilliary earned that reputation all on her own.

          Nah.  It has more to do with the media.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by edenscape246494 (February 19, 2008 5:31 pm ET)
             
          Links?  Facts?  Anything other than your narrow POV?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (February 19, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
             
          Not that I'm doubting you, but do you have anything to backup your moronic accusation about Senator Clinton?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (February 19, 2008 5:42 pm ET)
             

          "He did not call her (a) name, he asked a question."

          -POV

          This is precisely the trend that I wish would stop in the MSM.  Fox started it, and the rest of them just ran with it.  I'm talking about a leading question, like the one Cavuto so slyly uses here.  Mostly it's in the graphics and banners, but occasionally an anchor or pundit will pull the same stunt.  It's unprofessional and unethical in a journalistic sense.  

          Of course, this is Fox News I'm talking about... 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mari2j (February 20, 2008 1:35 am ET)
               
            He asked a question that definately had a point of view that he placed in QUOTEs and used the word, many who had said it.  And just who were the folks he quoted?  Or were there in fact, any such people?  Most are far too timid to come right out with their totally sexist comments about any woman politician.  In fact, the lie of the Cavoto story is that there should be no quotes or if he uses quotes along with the statement that others are saying it, use quotes with an attribution.  He either made it up, had no source, or he is just plain mean spirited and hateful.  Start with the last as yuor first choice and you got it right!!!!!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (February 19, 2008 6:01 pm ET)
             
          Clinton did not turn cackle, cleavage, clothing, clapping, and pointing into campaign issues.  Only the "liberal media" can do that.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by go3 (February 19, 2008 6:09 pm ET)
         
      What does Cavuto's opinion of Hillary Clinton have to do with business? Those are some vey confused people working over there at Fox News,
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 20, 2008 7:42 am ET)
           

        Bitc#es don’t belong in business – Hillary shouldn’t be allowed to “run the country”. I think that’s what Cavuto is saying here. This is Faux News remember - they’d find a way of trashing Hillary if it was a weather report.

        Which has me thinking… -  My guess is that if there are many Republicans in the pool of people who decide hurricane names, I can guarantee you there will be a “Hillary” or "Barrack" in the list this hurricane season.:)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by unhipcat (February 19, 2008 6:31 pm ET)
         
      neal has room to talk about a b*tchy image?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BillJ-MN (February 19, 2008 7:30 pm ET)
         

      I'll agree with the critics of this piece to a small degree.  The headline does slightly mislead with regard to Cavuto's phrasing.

      However, what Cavuto is doing in this piece is not an evenhanded portrayal of Clinton's image.  He is obviously using the "her critics claim" phrase as a tool for putting out the description he wants to use.

      It's simply a variation on the "some people say" technique.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (February 20, 2008 7:33 am ET)
         

      Take away the misogynistic definition of bitc#y and replace it with the more colloquial definition (that I normally use for the word) as being “cranky” or "short-fused" – and there is only one candidate who has a well documented history that makes him deserving of the “image”. I’m sure the temperament of Maverick McCain will become a much bigger issue in the General Election than this misrepresentation of Hillary that Cavuto is attempting to play on here.

      Report Abuse