Cavuto: Clinton "trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image"
While discussing Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign strategy for the March 4 Democratic primary in Texas, Neil Cavuto said of Clinton: "[S]he's trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image."
On the February 18 edition of Fox Business News' Cavuto, during a discussion about Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign strategy for the March 4 Democratic primary in Texas, Republican strategist Frank Guerra asserted that "tough-as-nails ladies" are elected to office in Texas and said, "I think that Hillary Clinton really needs to be tough in this race in the next two weeks, and she needs to be very definitive about her positions because she needs to draw a sharp contrast between where she is and where people are still not sure about where [Sen.] Barack Obama is." Host Neil Cavuto responded, "But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she's trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn't that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama?"
As Media Matters for America documented, during the March 15, 2007, broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Glenn Beck said of Clinton, "[S]he's the stereotypical bitch, you know what I mean?" Also, defending Sen. John McCain over his failure to denounce the reference by a campaign event audience member to Clinton as a "bitch," Politico chief political correspondent Mike Allen said, "All right. But what Republican voter hasn't thought that? What voter in general hasn't thought that?" Politico chief political columnist Roger Simon began his November 16 column by asserting, "The (rhymes with rich) is back."
From the February 18 edition of Fox Business News' Cavuto:
CAVUTO: So if you're doing ads, real quickly, if you're doing ads, Frank, and she's known as these get-in-the-face ads, saying that Barack Obama is afraid to debate her and all of that. He calls them attack ads. They don't seem like very attacking ads to me. But nevertheless, does she need to do more of that or what?
GUERRA: Oh, absolutely. I think so far, some of the ads that I've seen here in Texas have been sort of soft and lovely. They're very good ads. But I think she really needs to be tough here in Texas.
Keep in mind the kind of women that we elect to office here in Texas. On the Democratic side, let me just say two words: Ann Richards. I still picture her on her Harley with her leather jacket. You look at Kay Bailey Hutchison, you know, our U.S. senator. You look at some of the state senators like Judith Zaffirini and Leticia Van de Putte. I'm telling you, those are tough-as-nails ladies.
And I think that Hillary Clinton really needs to be tough in this race in the next two weeks, and she needs to be very definitive about her positions because she needs to draw a sharp contrast between where she is and where people are still not sure about where Barack Obama is.
CAVUTO: But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she's trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn't that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama? In other words, isn't she between kind of like a rock and a hard place?
GUERRA: I don't think so, because remember, because we've been out of the race for so long, we're ready for a fight. We really want to see something. We're almost like Missouri number two, you know, "Show Me." So I think she needs to demand that of Barack Obama in this race.











The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles



Looks like she has 2 options, according to Cavuto- Embrace the tough, bltchy image, or "run away".
Both very appealing.
Dex, there is an errant period in the bold section below the headline. No period in the headline, the entire quote printed two more times, and a video clip.I think you're trying pretty hard to find some sort of sinister attempt to mis-quote on the part of MMFA.
But I sometimes blame my bad days on others too. ;0)
Full, in-context quote:
But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she's trying to run away from this tough, kind of b*tchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn't that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama?
Cropped, misleading piece of libel:
"[S]he's trying to run away from this tough, kind of b*tchy image."
Colonel KFC, the reason this is bad is because it is exactly, precisely the kind of thing that MMfA rails against when it comes out of rightie pundits' mouths. It's not ok for Rushbo to crop quotes and restate out of context, and neither is it ok for MMfA to do the same.
I'm having a great day..how do you like your job as a professional apologist?
Yeah, Marv! I wanna go to that site, where the entire quote is provided, maybe two or three times.Why, a site like that might even post a video clip, in addition to everything else!
Heh. But then, I'm just an apologist. I'm not sure for whom, but the Cavuto apologist said it, so it must be true.
Apparently you're happy with sloppy headlines here, but some of us would rather that a media watchdog site watch and report more carefully.
Cavuto; Critics claim Clinton "trying to run away from this tough, kind of bit@hy image.........."
(was that so hard now Colonel?)
No, Tommy, that was easy. By putting quotation marks around the words, you make it appear as if Cavuto was quoting some actual critics.Unfortunately, he's not quoting anyone, so the new and improved more"accurate" headline you propose is an outright lie, as opposed to MMFA's, which you feel doesn't include everything you want it to.
That wasn't so hard at all.In fact, it looks like you didn't even really think it through.
Apparently I am not as happy with media watchdog shoddiness as you are, and you just accused me of enabling media inferiorness, when it's actually you who keeps your little MMFA apologist bag handy.
Well done.
OK, this has been fun, Tommy-Bltch, but now I have to assume you're just being thick for kicks.
I'll drop it, but if you want to come out looking good with something besides empty accusations against me being an apologist, all you've got to do is cite a source for the "quote" in your new, non-shoddy, suggested headline.
Name the source of that quote, I'll apologize, and recognize your sterling standards for media accuracy. (tee-hee)
So you're claiming that none of Hillary's critics have ever thought she was of that image? You want a link to that??
okkkkkkkkkkk.....
Cute Colonel, but Cavuto said her "critics"; and then you somehow act all ignorant and coy, essentially saying "ahh, what critics"???
Perhaps you've been hanging out in that cornfield photographing straw scarecrows lately, otherwise you wouldn't have to ask.
"You guys are funny"
You should see it from the non-butt end of the joke. Hi-larious!
You are correct Dex, MMFA is implying through its headline, and in the summary, that Cavuto himself is editorializing his image of Hillary.....when in fact it is her critics that he is talking about.
But accuracy and fairness isn't as much fun as skewering a Fox-er with far more inflammatory vagueness.
Tommy, you're having as bad a day as Dex.Even if you're distracted by Cavuto's attributing his own thoughts to "Hillary's critics", you've got to see that he's setting up two equally undesirable characterizations of HC. He's using the "rock and a hard place" phrase to make it appear that he's sympathizing with her, when he's the one who's trying to put her there.
HRC's choices, according to Cavuto;
A. Be tough, and be perceived as bltchy
B. "Run away" from the bltchy image
A b*tch, or a cut & runner.Do you think those are realistically the only options?
If you post here, and take a tough stance in a discussion, do you think it's reasonable to refer to you as a bltch?
If you object to being called that, would you describe yourself as "running away from your bltchy image?
"...kind of b*tchy image that her critics claim that she has..."
Uh, Neil...don't you mean the "b*tchy image" that her critics have created? Any politician, male or female, has to be tough. But b*tchy...? Where does that come from? Other than Frank Morris, most people who know Hillary Clinton say she is a pretty nice person.
The media has created the image of Hillary the B#tch, McCain the Maverick & Obama the Messiah.
Hillary was stuck with the only negative image.
Yeah Neil she is between a rock & a hard place....thanks to folks like you.
What garbage. Hilliary earned that reputation all on her own.
Nah. It has more to do with the media.
"He did not call her (a) name, he asked a question."
-POV
This is precisely the trend that I wish would stop in the MSM. Fox started it, and the rest of them just ran with it. I'm talking about a leading question, like the one Cavuto so slyly uses here. Mostly it's in the graphics and banners, but occasionally an anchor or pundit will pull the same stunt. It's unprofessional and unethical in a journalistic sense.
Of course, this is Fox News I'm talking about...
Bitc#es don’t belong in business – Hillary shouldn’t be allowed to “run the country”. I think that’s what Cavuto is saying here. This is Faux News remember - they’d find a way of trashing Hillary if it was a weather report.
Which has me thinking… - My guess is that if there are many Republicans in the pool of people who decide hurricane names, I can guarantee you there will be a “Hillary” or "Barrack" in the list this hurricane season.:)
I'll agree with the critics of this piece to a small degree. The headline does slightly mislead with regard to Cavuto's phrasing.
However, what Cavuto is doing in this piece is not an evenhanded portrayal of Clinton's image. He is obviously using the "her critics claim" phrase as a tool for putting out the description he wants to use.
It's simply a variation on the "some people say" technique.
Take away the misogynistic definition of bitc#y and replace it with the more colloquial definition (that I normally use for the word) as being “cranky” or "short-fused" – and there is only one candidate who has a well documented history that makes him deserving of the “image”. I’m sure the temperament of Maverick McCain will become a much bigger issue in the General Election than this misrepresentation of Hillary that Cavuto is attempting to play on here.