About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: "[A] lot of these feminists and women ... think they're owed" a Clinton win; "they've had two or three abortions"

April 01, 2008 7:42 pm ET

image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

On the April 1 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh said of a potential Hillary Clinton presidency, "[Y]ou have to understand the mindset of a lot of these feminists and women. They think they're owed this -- just like Obama supporters think they're owed this." Limbaugh continued: "These women have paid their dues. They've been married two or three times; they've had two or three abortions; they've done everything that feminism asked them to do. They have cut men out of their lives; they have devoted themselves to causes and careers. And this -- the candidacy of Hillary Clinton -- is the culmination of all of these women's efforts." He further stated: "And if it gets stolen from them, in their minds -- not actually stolen, but if the country or if the Democrat [sic] Party rejects this wonderfully great, lying woman in exchange for a rookie, radical black guy who can't tell the time of day, they are going to be so miffed. They are going to be so upset."

Limbaugh went on to claim: "[T]his is what the Democrat Party has sown ... The blacks one part of the constituency, the women another part. And both of them think they're owed this by the party, and if whoever doesn't get this -- the Hillary side, the Obama side -- they're going to think the party screwed them."

From the April 1 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: And if they -- you know, if Hillary doesn't get it -- you have to understand the mindset of a lot of these feminists and women. They think they're owed this -- just like Obama supporters think they're owed this. These women have paid their dues. They've been married two or three times; they've had two or three abortions; they've done everything that feminism asked them to do. They have cut men out of their lives; they have devoted themselves to causes and careers. And this -- the candidacy of Hillary Clinton -- is the culmination of all of these women's efforts. And if it gets stolen from them, in their minds -- not actually stolen, but if the country or if the Democrat [sic] Party rejects this wonderfully great, lying woman in exchange for a rookie, radical black guy who can't tell the time of day, they are going to be so miffed. They are going to be so upset. These Democrats are absolutely right about the anger over all this, because they are -- both sides of this equation think they are owed this nomination.

And by whom? The Democrat Party. The Democrat Party has promised American blacks for 50 years that they will see them through the dark days of bondage and emancipate them to equality and freedom and economic prosperity. And that's only happened for blacks who have abandoned the Democrat Party, and have become conservative Republicans. Well, there are a couple exceptions -- Bob Johnson, a few others. But mostly, they're no better off than they were 50 years ago economically when they started voting Democrat.

On the Hillary side, always women, the feminists. You know, they made sure they followed the script. Paula Jones was trailer trash. Kathleen Willey was insane. Whatever Bill Clinton did, they looked the other way; they stood for it because Mrs. Clinton was waiting in the wings.

So this is what the Democrat Party has sown. These are the wild oats that it has sown. It's promised -- every one of its constituencies is an entitlement-based constituency. And they've been promised, "We're going to do this for you, we're going to do" -- now, we've got the competition. Loggerheads. The blacks one part of the constituency, the women another part. And both of them think they're owed this by the party, and if whoever doesn't get this -- the Hillary side, the Obama side -- they're going to think the party screwed them. In the Obama case, they're going to know that Hillary did it, and Bill did it. In which case, they'll still blame the party.

So this -- well, on the women's side -- yeah, men in the party. On the Hillary side it'll be men in the party. But they're also mad at a bunch of women. They're -- EMILY's List, I've got a story here in the stack -- EMILY's List supported [Sens.] Amy Klobuchar [D-MN] and Claire McCaskill [D-MO], and they've endorsed Obama. And so EMILY's List is mad as hell at these two Democrat senators, Klobuchar and Claire McCaskill, because they think they're sellouts. They think they're traitors. I mean, there's more civil war going on in this party than you could possibly imagine. "Operation Chaos."

I kid you -- EMILY's List. So it's not just men that the women are going to be mad at on the Democrat side. They're going to be -- they're going to think a lot of these women are traitors, too. Hey, McCaskill, you wouldn't be where you are if it weren't for us, and EMILY's List, and Hillary. And hey, Klobuchar, who's heard of you even now but us? And you turn on us, and you turn on Hillary, you turn on the white mother that made it possible for all of us?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by noconspiracy (April 01, 2008 7:49 pm ET)
         
      Why would any "feminazi", or anyone else for that matter, accept the psychoanalasys of an obese, drug-addicted, thrice-maried draft dodger?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (April 03, 2008 1:55 pm ET)
           

        This is what Limbaugh would have said if Mitt was still in the race:

         

        LIMBAUGH: And if they -- you know, if Mitt Romney doesn't get it -- you have to understand the mindset of a lot of these neoconservatives and Fox News Republicans. They think they're owed this -- just like McCain supporters think they're owed this. These right-wingers have paid their dues. They've cheated on their wives and husbands two or three times; they've beaten up two or three foreigners; they've done everything that neoconservatism has asked them to do. They have sold their souls to Big Oil and Big Religion; they have devoted themselves to their lobbyists and respective deities. And this -- the candidacy of Mitt Romney-- is the culmination of all of these neo-con's efforts. And if it gets stolen from them, in their minds -- not actually stolen, but if the country or if the Republic [sic] Party rejects this wonderfully rich, lying man in exchange for a pandering, senile old guy who can't choose a position on virtually any policy, they are going to be so miffed. They are going to be so upset.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (April 01, 2008 7:50 pm ET)
         
      Rush will be on the air tomorrow saying this was just an April Fool's joke and liberals have no sense of humor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by noconspiracy (April 01, 2008 7:54 pm ET)
           
        Tell me about it. Conservative "humor" is invariably of the "poke in the eye" variety; the "humor" isn't in the "joke" itself - it's in the fact that he's telling it, and no one can stop him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by darkmass (April 01, 2008 7:58 pm ET)
           
        Well, Rush *is* an April fool...but then he's got the whole calendar covered.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (April 01, 2008 7:58 pm ET)
         

      "...you have to understand the mindset of a lot of these feminists and women."

      And who better to get unbiased insight into feminism and a woman's mindset than a man like Rush Limbaugh? 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dazedandconfused26 (April 01, 2008 8:00 pm ET)
           
        Rush must think his man boobs make him half a woman, thats where he gets his insight.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (April 01, 2008 11:25 pm ET)
             
          I wonder why Rush didn't try that as a defense when he got caught soliciting the male prostitute; that he was getting into the mind of a woman as research for his future radio show.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by AB-001 (April 01, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
         
      I wish every time the TV yak shows brought up RL's name as a political commentator someone would play crap like this and question why anyone takes him seriously
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (April 01, 2008 8:10 pm ET)
         

      Ugh.  More right-wing WHINING about not being able to capture the black vote... 

      "The Democrat Party has promised American blacks for 50 years that they will see them through the dark days of bondage and emancipate them to equality and freedom and economic prosperity. And that's only happened for blacks who have abandoned the Democrat Party, and have become conservative Republicans."

      What's happened is a few blacks have found an easy way to cash in by selling their soul to the right wing to be pimped on Fox News.

      This is just ridiculous.  If the Republicans really wanted the black vote, they would spend more time telling blacks why their party is the answer to their grievances, rather than just selling fear about the Dems.

      Of what party affiliation was the president who worked to pass the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act and nominated Thurgood Marshall to the SCOTUS? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (April 02, 2008 7:04 am ET)
           
        Its amazing the BS the "truth detector" spews, huh? Its not the Democrats saying that the big, bad federal government needs to stay out of labor, civil rights, education and other issues.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (April 03, 2008 11:49 am ET)
           
        Much like there position on labor issues, the Repulblican's haven't been on the right side of a civil rights issue since the Emancipation Proclamation.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (April 01, 2008 9:00 pm ET)
         

      "They have cut men out of their lives"

      gee, wonder why, if so.... 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (April 01, 2008 9:33 pm ET)
         
      Mrs Lmbaugh must be so proud !
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (April 01, 2008 9:46 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh: "[A] lot of these feminists and women ... think they're owed" a Clinton win; "they've had two or three abortions"

      Well now if those women aborted Bill Clinton's kids he might have a point ;-) They would be "owed" a victory.

      Rush's ruminations really have to be taken with a grain of salt. The guy likes to stir things up. Yes I'm sure some of his fans hang on his every word, but I think most of us that occasionally tune him in do so for a laugh. Well at least I do. Sometimes the guy is funny. Other times, like this example, he just sounds like a buffoon.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (April 01, 2008 10:24 pm ET)
           

        Jeter,

        I read this as a typical Rush putdown of traditional feminists who back Hillary. This would be the Jane Fonda, Gloria Steinem types. However what Rush doesn't note is that the feminist movement is split with the younger, more educated women moving over to Obama.  What is interesting is that white, working-class women still support Hillary, while blackand affluent women are moving to Obama.  White women comprise 44% of the voters in the Democratic primaries. Obama has taken away a lot of Hillary's attempt at getting women to vote gender. 

        The Democrats have lived for so long on identity politics. Women, blacks, Latinos, gays, poor, all victims who seek government to help them. Now that two of the prized groups are running against each other we see a fracture in the party.  The Dems made their bed, now they are tearing it apart.  Rush is attempting to get out in front so he can take credit, but it would have happened without his operation chaos anyway.  His anti-feminist rant needs some revising.  

        Report Abuse
        • Author by DEMS_SOL (April 01, 2008 11:10 pm ET)
             
          I'm not exactly sure what his point is - but if he was implying that the Democratic Party has compartmentalized the society into groups of victims who are "owed" something I have to agree with him.  This is exactly what the Geralldine Ferraro and Rev. Wright comments have brought to the debate.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (April 01, 2008 11:18 pm ET)
               
            SURE you agree with him. The hivemind has instructed you to not only BELIEVE such ignorance but repeat it as often as possible. Its STUPID but a propaganda parrots gotta do what a propaganda parrots gotta do.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DEMS_SOL (April 02, 2008 11:18 am ET)
                 
              Congratulations - you typed all those words and added nothing to the conversation.  You're starting to sound like BO.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (April 02, 2008 12:05 pm ET)
                   

                And you're starting to smell like...

                Nah, too easy.

                And too true. 

                Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (April 02, 2008 3:03 pm ET)
                   
                Did you think YOU added anything to the conversation with your tired and ignorant hivemind talking point about liberal victims? If you did than you are even MORE delusional than I thought. Try to keep up. Actual adults are talking here.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (April 01, 2008 11:29 pm ET)
             

           "Women, blacks, Latinos, gays, poor, all victims who seek government to help them. " (Anotheramerican)

          Did you mean to type that, or just think it? I will say it's a refreshing bit of honesty, most  conservatives use their inside voice for that stuff.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (April 01, 2008 11:52 pm ET)
             

          The Democrats have lived for so long on identity politics.  Women, blacks, Latinos, gays, poor, all victims who seek government to help them”---AA

          Of the two parties it seems to me that the Republicans suffer from this the more.  Republican identity has historically been self defined as not being with all those out groups you refer to.  And they won’t relent even after they elect gangsters.  They’ll reelect them.  You wouldn’t see that sort of firm identification among the Democratic electorate.

          The dynamics work this way:  First, the Republicans want nothing to do with a lot of these groups you mention and others.  In response, the Democratic Party capitalizes on this by taking them in and giving them something at least, if only at times a sense of belonging.  Then Republicans complain that that these groups don’t want to blend in, or assimilate or mix with them---that they’re bad Americans

          Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (April 02, 2008 1:01 am ET)
             

          The conservatives like YOU have lived so long with LYING pretty much constantly that now its the only trick in their bag. Another day another worthless ignorant baseless assertion by Anotheridiot.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (April 02, 2008 7:10 am ET)
             
          Not really. If anything the various groups and the higher profile of minorities are creating more interest on the Democratic side of the fence than the Republican. Republicans have at least as much identity politics but their base is shrinking and they have nothing new to offer.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by MoonbatYouBet (April 01, 2008 10:27 pm ET)
           

        He's funniest when he's not trying to be and most pathetic when he's trying to be funny.

        But Rush's words should be taken seriously.  To a certain demographic his word is gospel and those people not only vote but they spread the word.  Every ridiculous "You wouldn't believe what the liberals are trying to do now" story overheard in a bar or in the breakroom starts with Rush and filters down through his fans.  Those annoying right wing chain letters filled with with outright lies come from fans of Rush.  That small margin of victory that  meant we'd continue with an incompetent and destructive administration listened to Rush.

        He's not the only one, but he's the loudest and the trendsetter.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (April 01, 2008 10:58 pm ET)
             

          And his show promo about his show being the other right wing show hosts' preparation is probably accurate.  I know Hannity admits to listening regularly.  My guess is most of the nationally syndicated ones do and probably the local ones too. 

          I'd like to know is Limbaugh a puppet or student of somebody or is he really effectively the rhetorical architect of the party himself.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (April 03, 2008 11:51 am ET)
           
        They fact that there is anyone who takes this idiotic gasbag seriously (are there are more than a few) makes him dangerous.  He is a threat to the goal of an educated, well-informed society. 
        Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (April 03, 2008 2:37 pm ET)
           
        "Rush's ruminations really have to be taken with a grain of salt. The guy likes to stir things up."

        Well, sure. But if people are going to insist that Obama must continue to answer for Wright's comments (btw I've read you saying Obama "still has some splainin' to do) I'm going to insist conservatives answer for Rush.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (April 01, 2008 10:20 pm ET)
         
      And a lot of conservatives think this lying gasbag makes sense instead of being a peice of human garbage. Which he demonstrates day after day.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (April 01, 2008 10:34 pm ET)
         

      oh.our.god! that is just too f*ing funny for words! rush "i just don't do good personal relationships" limbaugh, professing great insight to the "feminist" mindset.

      thrice divorced himself, do we sense a pattern here? lol

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (April 01, 2008 11:31 pm ET)
           
        I'm also wondering , considering his analysis of the clear divide between blacks and women,if Rush is aware that many Black people are women. Or would figuring that in be too complicated for Rush and his zombies?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (April 02, 2008 1:04 am ET)
             
          He dont NEED no stinking logic he has an ideology.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (April 02, 2008 8:42 am ET)
             
          Black women, according to the polling, are voting overwhelmingly for Obama. This demographic has really hurt Hillary in the primaries.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (April 01, 2008 11:53 pm ET)
         
      I guess I don't understand his point here. Usually I get what he's trying to say, but this is... I don't know what it is. Can someone explain?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eddy3957 reregistered (April 02, 2008 12:35 am ET)
           

        He's conflating feminism with the Democratic Party for political gain.  Many people who have tended to vote Republican do so because they are voting against some group or groups and this includes some movements that involve cultural change, especially change associated with 1960's.  He wants to burnish into the minds of his listeners associations between the Democratic Party and the groups that the potential GOP voters dislike; in this case feminist women and Blacks.  The objective is to have his listeners vote against their own best interests and elect Republicans who will use the country as though they owned it, as opposed to being temporary custodians of it. 

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ashrakay2830 (April 02, 2008 1:54 am ET)
         
      This guy cracks me up.  He's like the fat kid in school that will say or do anything to get attention.  I'm sure he'll be eating bugs before we know it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by moe (April 02, 2008 6:10 am ET)
         

      I used to believe projection was psycho-babble.  But Comedian proves me wrong everyday. (Replace Obama, Clinton, women, etc. with Limbaugh and you'll see what I mean)

      This guy should be studied by physicians, psychiatrists and veterinarians...perhaps he's got an extra chromosome...Comedian...the missing link?  Think about it. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (April 02, 2008 10:17 am ET)
         

      Dear Rush, 

      I heard that one of your wives had an abortion because she did not want another YOU to be born in this lifetime(even though DNA eventually proved you were not the father). It is a shame that this horrible event happened in your life but hey, it was just a joke.

      In my lifetime, I was contemplating have an abortion but didn't...most of the time I wish I did.

      Love,

      Mom

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sc_parker (April 02, 2008 11:50 am ET)
         

      Why is it than when a  mother CHOOSES life, you liberals become so enraged?

      I can't stand McCain, but I will vote for him because John Paul Stevens is 86 years old and might not make it another four years.  We are just one vote away!!!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (April 02, 2008 12:07 pm ET)
           

        Why is it than when a  mother CHOOSES life, you liberals become so enraged?

        Why is it when the wingnuts create strawmen out of nothing, they become so ignorant? 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (April 02, 2008 12:07 pm ET)
           

        Who is enraged about that? Who is enraged about anything here? Maybe you should explain!

        My question is why do Cons so deranged about anything any liberal says or does?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by AussieBob (April 03, 2008 6:19 am ET)
           

        "Why is it than when a  mother CHOOSES life, you liberals become so enraged?"

        - sc_parker / Wednesday April 2, 2008 11:50:52 AM EDT

         

        That was Eric Cartman on South Park, and he was doing it because he wanted his own Shakey's.

        And he's a conservative to the core.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (April 02, 2008 1:58 pm ET)
         

      Rush demonstrates his awesome and complete understanding of women and reality once again.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ChiCat (April 02, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
         
      How do women who've cut men out of their lives marry multiple times or have 2 or 3 abortions?  And how does someone with his marriage track record say this sort of stuff with a straight face?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (April 02, 2008 4:49 pm ET)
           

        Rush is right on. Why I've been with a heap o' fellers and had at least 9 abortions, but who's countin'? I got ever' abortion with the help of the state and just want fellers for carnal good times. Hey, that's all them fellers is good for. I chew them fellers up ('specially the fat ones -they're good eatin') and spit them out. Tain't no other use for 'em. Yeah, I'm a feminazi bigtime. Proud to be. I just wish Rush, with his big furry belly would show up with a deck lar ation of matrimony. I'd sure like to be the 4th ex wife. Mmmmmn, Mmmmn. That Rush sure talks so purty I jes' wouldn't be able to contain myself. Salute. *

         

        *no offense to admirers of Hee Haw. My Dad loved that show. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (April 02, 2008 8:13 pm ET)
         
      Hmm, interesting.  I'm a hard-core feminist, but I'm only in my first marriage and I've never had an abortion.  I also don't feel "owed" by the Dem party.  I'm such a loser !
      Report Abuse
    • Author by moondancer (April 03, 2008 9:26 am ET)
         
        Before you go and say that Fats is a hypocrite, you need to consider this.  While yes he is thrice divorced and an amoral drug addict, he has yet to have an abortion!  All the little Limbaughs are still swimming around in that massive gut in a drug induced coma.  So cut the unpainted clown of the right a little slack, he is only an ass.  The hole can be added later.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jinxer (April 03, 2008 10:42 am ET)
         

      you have to understand the mindset of a lot of these feminists and women. They think they're owed this....

      Here Limberger, here's your Neanderthal club to whack those women over the head & drag them back(by the hair) into their cave AND here's that bullwhip to crack your house Negro into shape(how dare he try to decipher time) & back to the kitchen.....

      ....you are Sooooo knowledgable concerning the mindset of lesser individuals.....it's just a gift you have, Limpy  

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (April 03, 2008 11:45 am ET)
         

      "These women have paid their dues. They've been married two or three times;"

      Wow.  I never realized Rush was such a feminist.  What a flaming hypocrite.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 03, 2008 12:46 pm ET)
         
      What has the REPUBLICAN PARTY sowen in the past eight years. LIES , DECETE, ASSUALT ON GOVERNMENT CHECKS AND BALLANCES, GRABBING POWER FOR THE EXECTUTIVE BRANCH, NOT LISTENING TO ANYONE BUT THEMSELVES,BEING ASSLEEP AT THE SWITCH WHILE THE NATION ENDURES THE WORST TERRORIST ATTACK IN ITS HISTORY,STARTING A WAR WITH A NATION THAT HAD NOTHING  TO DO WITH THAT ATTACK , A WAR WITH 4000 DEAD 30,000 WOUNDED ,BILLIONS SPENT AND NO END IN SITE, THE MASTERMIND OF 9-11 STILL AT LARGE, Yeah this is a legacy that the REPUBLICANS can really be proud of.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by writingindependence (April 03, 2008 4:40 pm ET)
         
      So what Lymphbug, the fluoridators have had hundreds of thousands of unconsenting abortions notched out of their goodie-twoshoe tooth fairy tally.

      What people really want to know is in depth analysis of the Lymphbug's deceptive runaround. Just today he was giving everyone a lecture on the difference between democracy and a republican. Stark raving illiterate as he has to be to help get out and push the 5th Columnbine in America, there is reason to consider him for a place alongside other Presidential monuments:

      http://www.freewebs.com/writingindependence/SlipperySlopeMedia.pdf

      http://www.freewebs.com/writingindependence/main.htm
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thedailyphosdex (April 03, 2008 5:29 pm ET)
         

      As if that weren't awful enough, the GOP can just as easily invoke "economic reasons" to excuse a ban on not just abortion, but also contraception, family planning and sex education.

      Said "economic reasons" being nothing less than maintaining an unskilled, labour-intensive, Luddite socioeconomic model and paradigm.

      Said paradigm expecting a "complete and final" reduction in unemployment to a theoretical nil rate within free-market capitalistic parameters and models (cf. Communist thinking, which saw mass unemployment as one of capitalism's weakest links and failings, yet excused all manner of "make-work/fake-work" positions being created to create the aura of nil-rate unemployment).

      Report Abuse
    • Author by avargas587 (April 04, 2008 12:44 am ET)
         
      I see that most comments are built around insulting Limbaugh but very few if any actually try to provide an argument or evidence that he is wrong. I guess most people have a gut feeling about the guy. However, that feeling is not translating into a well crafted argument.

      I am not saying that the guy is right. It just seems that the comments are based more on emotions than intellect. Is it possible to listen to the argument and attack his assumptions and logic instead of his character and personality?

      Perhaps the true is evident to most people but to at least 13 million of his listeners (and may be the forty something percent of the country that voted Republican in the last election) the true is not evident. How do you educate those people without insulting them? Can someone make a compelling argument or are juvenile comments all one can do to counteract Limbaugh?


      Report Abuse
    • Author by jivehombre4008 (April 04, 2008 1:24 am ET)
         
      Limbaugh's Operation Chaos originally encouraged republicans to vote for Obama.

      His stated motive was "vote for the less electable"increasing McCains chance of election.When Obama started to lead he encouraged a vote for Hillary.His self stated motive today is "create mischief".Voting for Hillary helps get Hillary the nomination.But I dont understand what is mischievous about getting Hillary the nomination.Maybe there's a much less convoluted motive.The white backlash that is so American and so predictable.His kind cant stomach a black president.

      Jivehombre
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jivehombre4008 (April 04, 2008 2:10 am ET)
         
      Limbaugh's Operation Chaos originally encouraged
      republicans to vote for Obama.
      His stated motive was "vote for the less
      electable"increasing McCains chance of election.When
      Obama started to lead he encouraged a vote for
      Hillary.His self stated motive today is "create
      mischief".Voting for Hillary  helps get Hillary the
      nomination.But I dont understand what is mischievous
      about getting Hillary the nomination.Maybe there's a
      much less convoluted motive.The white backlash that is
      so American and so predictable.His kind cant stomach a
      black president.
      Jivehombre
      Report Abuse