Minneapolis radio host Baker: Media Matters "can kiss my supple buttocks"
Responding to a Media Matters item, Chris Baker said: "Media Matters people can kiss my supple buttocks. What I say is what I say, and if they don't like it, instead of hiding like a bunch of commie girls, they can challenge me if they like."
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
On the September 19 broadcast of his Minneapolis radio show, Chris Baker addressed a Media Matters for America item documenting his September 18 remark that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) reported response to the Wall Street crisis was "[a]nother reason why it's very rare to find a woman worthy of serving in political office." During a discussion with a caller, Baker said: "[B]y the way, as I'm sitting here, I have made the Media Matters hit list once again, which I'm very proud of. I love -- Media Matters people can kiss my supple buttocks. What I say is what I say, and if they don't like it, instead of hiding like a bunch of commie girls, they can challenge me if they like."
The Chris Baker Show airs on Minneapolis' 100.3 KTLK-FM, owned by Clear Channel Communications.
From the September 19 broadcast of KTLK's The Chris Baker Show:
BAKER: Well, here's what I worry about, sir, and I can't -- and, by the way, as I'm sitting here, I have made the Media Matters hit list once again, which I'm very proud of. I love -- Media Matters people can kiss my supple buttocks. What I say is what I say, and if they don't like it, instead of hiding like a bunch of commie girls, they can challenge me if they like.
















So true. But of course that kind of makes this kind of like the ultimate "WITH".
(Aside from the fact that it's hilarious, I mean.) LOL.
I believe they did "challenge" him, by posting the item in the first place. What does he expect them to do, come to the station and throw a soccer ball at his face?
Obviously he's prepared for such a threat, though.
Ooooo...yeah, look at me shakin'. I'm really scared.
That's not even a real soccer ball. He's just a total wimp. He'd be whizzin' in his drawers if that was a badminton shuttlecock.
HEY PANTY WAIST - HOW ABOUT TRYING THAT WITH A BADMINTON SHUTTLECOCK, HUH? I'VE SEEN BADMINTON SHUTTLECOCKS HANDLE A LOT BETTER THAN YOU, AND A BADMINTON SHUTTLECOCK WOULD KICK YOUR DELICATE BUTTOCKS ALL THE WAY TO ST. PAUL. YOU DON'T HAVE THE CAJONES TO FACE A BADMINTON SHUTTLECOCK, YOU WHUSS.
Did he hear me? I hope he heard me. Yeah, come on over here, you sissy. I got a badminton shuttlecock with your name on it. Or maybe a bocce ball. He would get totally pwned by a bocce ball.
Momma's boy...
This new "tag, you're it" game MMFA is now engaged in playing with local radio jocks is absolutely entertaining as all get out.
I do not think MMFA is engaged in any game. Talk radio is is the scum of America and they are pointing it out.
Regulation like what is being done on Wall Street is needed on the air waves too.
I will give you one example. Here is Boston, there are 2 FM and 1 AM station where all you hear is talk. NPR, 96.9 on FM dial and 680 on AM dial.
Some NPR shows take in callers but most of them just present their shows.
On the other hand, all the remaining two staions do is host Republicans (Republican is such a dirty word these days to Republicans themselves so they claim to be Independents, Conservatives, Libertarians, even Democrats like a McPhee) and all they do is spew hatred (IMO, towards anyone not 'like' them). They insult/deride/smear anyone they do not agree with, while they make their case on topic in hand.
People call in. 8 out of 10 times, callers agree with the host. Other two times, host makes comments similar to noted on this article. The host has screeners, I do not know their job definition (may be filter drunkards, cursers), but I think their practical job is to only allow the agreers through.
"I do not think MMFA is engaged in any game. Talk radio is is the scum of America and they are pointing it out."
Then, if that's true, why don't they have subject threads about Randi Rodes or Rachel Madow? They do the exact same thing as any right wing show. I've never heard of Baker and I agree with his 'kiss my buttocks' statement. Mmfa does, in fact, hide like sissy girls. Have you ever seen one of their representatives show up on tv? How about radio? No? Me neither. They must be sissy commy girls.
"(may be filter drunkards, cursers)"
So, you complain about right wing radio who "spew hatred" while your calling them "drunkards, cursers". Isn't that a bit hypocritical? Sounds like you would do the exact same thing if you had your own show. What is it you're whining about, again?
Once again - READ THE MISSION STATEMENT, MORON! MMFA makes no claim of polictial objectivity or balance. They point out when conservatives lie, or when lies are passed on by unwitting independants that forward the conservative agenda. Period.
And it's not about disagreeing with thier position or even their tone (which is about all you've got against Maddow and Rhodes). It's about their using LIES and MISINFORMTAION and STEREOTYPES and PROPAGANDA that's been proven to be DEMONSTRABLY, FACTUALLY FALSE to make thier point. If you don't like MMFA exposing the truth, maybe you guys should stop telling lies, and stop tuning in to the liars that tell them.
"When they stop lying about us, we'll stop telling the truth about them." - Adlai Stephenson. (No greater truth has ever been spoken.)
I don't see it as a game, Tomme. Conservative misinformation is still misinformation - whether it's put out there by a nationally-syndicated liar like Jeff Christie or Sean Insanity, or a local jerk such as this clown.
J,
Truth is these types of threads are here for one reason and one reason only. Not to expose them, but so the posters here can tee off and let 'em have it. A little smack around a little bit, for good measure, stress relief and sport. At least be honest about that, as there is no other reason for it.
As I said, it's entertaining.
Entertaining? Perhaps, but why are you so tedious?
If these types of threads were truly here for the reasons you state, why aren't all of the non-endorsement posts deleted for not fitting the agenda?
I will give you credit though, at least you're not asking why it's here.
I don't think the term "supple" looks like it applies either.
Hey Baker, if you read this...
You sucked at WIOD...and was Neil Rogers right about you!!!!!
Just what kind of challenge are you looking for, Chrissy? A debate of the issues perhaps? Naaaaaaah. Of course not. Somebody like you would hide from that like a flabby, soccer ball threatening, half wit hides from exercise.
What you say is what you say. We’re here to say that what you say is stupid.
Leave it to a rightwinger to bring a knife to a gunfight...
Did he say "supple" or "ample".
Regardless, I think its sexual harrasment on the cheap.
Ask any German with experience from WW2 about Russian womanhood. They wouldn't even consider gutting this clown as a notworthy event.
What's the deal with the guy holding a soccer ball and a knife? Does that imply he's some sort of toughguy?
And if I understand him, he's saying that we're a bunch of commie girls for posting on the internet and not saying thins to his face, yet he hides behind his mic and says things denigrating women.
I'm too much of a commie little girl to face him but I'd like for him to make those comments in front of my 11 year old grand daughter. She's kick his ass from here to Sunday.
In a fight my money is on the soccer ball. At the last minute he'd probably let it roll out of his hand and stab himself through the palm.
A typical right wing telker who can use only bluster and bombast because they cannot articulate a rational position on any real issues. His target demographic understands lower class expressions such as references to violence testicles and buttocks. What does that say about him and them?
Seriously, do all right wingers think they can win every fight they start? I'm not talking about an argument, I'm talking about a physical confrontation. There's a lot of us on the left who aren't "hiding," and are not afraid to "challenge" someone. I for one am sick of being painted as some left-wing weenie who won't fight back. What the right-wing regressive party has done to America is a crime, and a shame. It's time to fight back.