About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Savage guest host Roberts: "[Y]ou may as well start an Obama savings account" so "welfare mom can have her new plasma TV as she pops kids out"

December 09, 2008 5:02 pm ET

Savage Nation guest host Rick Roberts directed listeners "to not give to charities this Christmas" and instead to "ke[ep] some of that money for yourself and your loved ones come tax season." Moments later, Roberts added: "That's when our new president's uber-welfare state's going to kick in, and you're going to wish you'd kept some of that money. So you may as well start an Obama savings account right now so that that welfare mom can have her new plasma TV as she pops kids out like a Pez dispenser."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

During the December 8 broadcast of Talk Radio Network's The Savage Nation, guest host Rick Roberts directed listeners "to not give to charities this Christmas," later asserting that President-elect Barack Obama is "going to come to the welfare crowd's defense anyway." Moments later, Roberts added: "You're going to wish you'd kept some of that money for yourself and your loved ones come tax season. That's when our new president's uber-welfare state's going to kick in, and you're going to wish you'd kept some of that money. So you may as well start an Obama savings account right now so that that welfare mom can have her new plasma TV as she pops kids out like a Pez dispenser. Since when did having kids become a cash crop?"

Earlier, Roberts said: "That's right. I want conservatives and Christians to stop donating your money, with one exception: anything to help the military is fine." He later stated, "When you get hit up for charities this Christmas season -- now, again, the only addendum to this is anything for the military is absolutely top of the list -- but everybody else, you need to remember, most of that money goes into either a) the pockets of people who run the charities, or b) drug addicts -- deadbeats on welfare who have nothing to contribute to their own lives, let alone society."

Roberts also said during the broadcast: "If you need another reason why Christians and conservatives should stop giving, here it is. I've had enough. I've had enough. Have you? I've had enough of the liberals and their name-calling. I've had enough of the attacks on churches, Mormon temples, Jewish synagogues. I've had enough of their hatred and spouting that our God doesn't exist."

Talk Radio Network, which syndicates The Savage Nation, claims that the show is heard on more than 350 radio stations. The Savage Nation reaches at least 8.25 million listeners each week, according to Talkers Magazine, making it one of the most listened-to talk radio shows in the nation, behind only The Rush Limbaugh Show and The Sean Hannity Show.

From the December 8 broadcast of Talk Radio Network's The Savage Nation:

ROBERTS: Look -- I've got a pretty radical announcement to make right now. All right, are you sitting down? Are you driving in the slow lane? I want conservatives and Christians to not give to charities this Christmas. Yeah, I said, not give to charities this Christmas. That's right. I want conservatives and Christians to stop donating your money, with one exception: anything to help the military is fine, because God knows the government isn't doing their fair share. You know, I've given this a lot of thought, and I believe the right thing to do this Christmas is not to give. Don't give to the homeless shelters or the soup kitchens, or this or that.

Now, many of you may already be cutting back on your giving this year. I know you are. You have to be. And you may be feeling guilty about it. "Well, you know, gosh, I couldn't give as much as I wanted to give, and I couldn't give as much as I have in years past." But I'm here to tell you: Drop the guilt. Get rid of it. You are doing the right thing by not giving. Don't feel guilty about keeping your money to take care of you and your family -- that's your first responsibility. Now, here's why I'm asking Christians and conservatives not to give this holiday, all right? I'm not trying to be cold-hearted. I'm not trying to be Grinch. I'm just trying to wake people up. Wake up.

I'm not trying to be mean. I'm not trying to be heartless or cruel. I'm trying to get people to open their eyes -- if your eyes haven't been opened -- about the economic events and the political events of the last three, four, five, six months. When you get hit up for charities this Christmas season -- now, again, the only addendum to this is anything for the military is absolutely top of the list -- but everybody else, you need to remember, most of that money goes into either a) the pockets of people who run the charities, or b) drug addicts -- deadbeats on welfare who have nothing to contribute to their own lives, let alone society.

[...]

ROBERTS: Give to your own family. Take care of your own responsibility. The economy's a drag -- people know that. People are down on their luck. It's getting worse, but not everyone gives up and buries their sorrows in a bottle or a bailout plan. Some people actually work harder, try harder, study harder. Give to those people. Help those who are trying to help themselves.

Besides, in the final analysis, Obama's going to come to the welfare crowd's defense anyway, which brings me to my third reason not to give to charities this holiday season: politics. Politics. You're going to wish you'd kept some of that money for yourself and your loved ones come tax season. That's when our new president's uber-welfare state's going to kick in, and you're going to wish you'd kept some of that money. So you may as well start an Obama savings account right now so that that welfare mom can have her new plasma TV as she pops kids out like a Pez dispenser. Since when did having kids become a cash crop?

And it's going to get worse. If you need another reason why Christians and conservatives should stop giving, here it is. I've had enough. I've had enough. Have you? I've had enough of the liberals and their name-calling. I've had enough of the attacks on churches, Mormon temples, Jewish synagogues. I've had enough of their hatred and spouting that our God doesn't exist.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Max Credits (December 09, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
         

      Savage Nation listeners don't give to charity.  Ever.  This idiot's tax advice is completely unnecessary.  "Don't spit on yourself" would have been more apt counsel for his listening audience.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (December 09, 2008 5:13 pm ET)
         

      I'm no financial wiz but I know that Obama takes office in January of 2009 and the next tax season ends on April 15, 2009. Taxes due on that date will be based on income earned in 2008. 

      Do Savage's fans ever think things through to a logical conclusion?

      And I don't care how many "welfare moms" that pop out kids like Pez dispensers this assclown can dream up, but any money they'll be receiving will fall far short of the billions given with no strings to AIG, Citigroup, and the rest of the thieves on Wall Street.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Great American (December 09, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
           

        Of course the Dems were pushing for the bailout of the financial instututions far more aggressively that the Republicans in Congress.  Remember?  The Dems had enough votes without Republicans but would not vote without Republicans so that they could all take the fall later.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (December 09, 2008 7:07 pm ET)
             

          They had enough votes without republicans? Really? Sorry charlie, but you need 60 votes to have a fillibuster and veto proof majority, and that couldn't be achieved without at least 10 republicans. You fail, try again.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by SFnomad (December 09, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
               

            Actually, in the Senate, you need 60 votes to avoid a filibuster and 67 votes to override a veto.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (December 09, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
                 

              67? That's right, 2/3. We spend so much time focusing on 60 that that little fact gets lost. Thanks for reminding me!

              Report Abuse
          • Author by Great American (December 10, 2008 10:57 am ET)
               

            They had enough votes because there were enough stupid Republicans supporting the bill.  Good try.  You lose.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 10, 2008 11:20 am ET)
                 

              So Republicans who supported the bill were stupid, but Dems who were against it were really for it, but were playing politics?. Interesting hallucination. You should try to avoid calling other people "losers" wit that sort of wacky logic.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (December 10, 2008 11:25 am ET)
                 

              Remember?  The Dems had enough votes without Republicans...

              They had enough votes because there were enough stupid Republicans supporting the bill...

              You should at least try to pay attention to what you write before you claim victory, because your words suggest you are a moron.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by Great American (December 10, 2008 11:02 am ET)
               


            By Mark Impomeni
            Sep 29th 2008 10:00PM

            Filed Under:eHouse, Democrats, Republicans, Featured Stories, Economy

            Now that the financial markets bailout plan has failed to pass the House, at least for the time being, both sides are settling down to place blame for the failure. Democrats were quick to blame House Republicans for not bringing enough of their members along to vote for the bill. Republicans counter that as the majority party, Democrats can pass any bill they want without even a single Republican vote. So who is right? The time line of the negotiations favors the Republican version of events.

            Early last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) made it clear that there would be no bailout bill brought to the floor unless Republicans could bring along significant support from their minority caucus. Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) openly called on the White House to guarantee the support of Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, calling it crucial to final passage of a bill. Reid later changed his mind after Sen. McCain dramatically announced that he was suspending his campaign to come to Washington for the negotiations, saying McCain's presence, "would not be helpful."

            Good try.  You lose this round.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (December 10, 2008 11:27 am ET)
                 

              I'm amazed you would actually post something that proves your 1st statement was completely moronic in nature. You said Dems could do it without republicans and then proceed to post info saying they couldn't do it without republicans. Gosh, how stupid is that?

              Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (December 09, 2008 7:59 pm ET)
             

          Don't get me wrong. I'm all for bailing out the financial system. I just want to see where the money is going and how it's spent. It's my money. 

          I don't care what someone who's down on their luck does with the money they get from the government because it's a paltry sum compared to the Corporate and Military Defense Contractor Welfare.

          Savage, his replacements and anyone else  complaining about welfare mothers only shows how uninformed they are.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by megabot (December 09, 2008 5:26 pm ET)
         

      Rick Roberts guest-hosting for Michael Savage.
      From one "compassionate conservative" to another "compassionate conservative".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DAWUSS (December 09, 2008 5:30 pm ET)
           

        He still has a long way to go before obtaining Savage's flair and punch.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (December 09, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
             

          I'm not exactly sure what they put in Savage's punch, but it certainly makes his mouth flair up.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (December 09, 2008 6:04 pm ET)
               

            More of a whole body Flame On. No actual combustian takes place however, except for brain cells.

            YES I CAN..YES I CAN,BWAHAHAHA!!!

            Report Abuse
        • Author by matrixbio2014 (December 11, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
             

          Rick Roberts is equallly moronic as Savage, but much less entertaining.  In fact, I would say that he is 1) much lower on cleverness than Savage 2) can't spin a fact for sh*t, which is what you have to be good at to get anywhere as a conservative misinformation outlet and 3) no entertainment value whatsoever. 

          I don't even bother monitoring Roberts when he fills in for Savage.  Savage twists and turns facts and delivers a slick product.  Roberts dishes up pure stupidity.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by johnotoole13181 (December 09, 2008 6:15 pm ET)
         

      How dare people call christians names? Don't they know it impedes their hatred? Poor put upon christians!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin (December 09, 2008 6:59 pm ET)
         

      I feel sorry for the other people who work on this show.  They have to listen to this swill day after day after day....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (December 09, 2008 7:05 pm ET)
         

      Don't give to charities this x-mas season. Yup, that pretty much sums up all of the right wing friends I know here in Austin.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (December 09, 2008 7:45 pm ET)
           

        Glad I don't live in Austin.  I don't what it is about charitable giving, whether I give because I can or I can because I give.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (December 09, 2008 8:10 pm ET)
             

          I wish I didn't right now. Between outsourcing and hiring freezes it's not a good place to live if you have a degree in the engineering fields.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (December 09, 2008 8:45 pm ET)
               

            Don't mean to be to forward, but what is your engineering discipline?  We don't have openings posted at the moment, but who knows what spring will bring.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (December 09, 2008 8:51 pm ET)
                 

              Nah, you're not being forward. Contacts really help.

              I'm a test engineer with process and project management experience. Also got several patents for some mechanical designs I proposed and managed through to completion. One design will actually generate income for my last job come summer next year.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by oscar the grouch (December 10, 2008 1:08 am ET)
                   

                Thanks, I'll keep that in mind and also will circulate with the contacts I have.  Maybe something will fall out if we shake hard enough.  Relocation problems??

                Report Abuse
    • Author by peebs755 (December 09, 2008 7:44 pm ET)
         
      Roberts is a local right wing talker here in San Diego. If you take evrything he says and turn it 180 degrees, you wil end up with the truth. He's a moron.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jonesjax2374 (December 09, 2008 10:16 pm ET)
         
      Attack on Mormons. Mormons who flooded our state to defeat Prop 8 that basically calls gay people less than a person. Name calling? Like anti-american, paling around with terrorists - that kind of name calling? This is such a funny new thread. I keep reading conservative comments about intolerance. Too funny. Yes I don't tolerate bigotry and lies and stupidity. And advising people not to give to charity is SOOOOOO Christian. YOUR God does NOT exist in MY bible, no.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coachslife3331 (December 09, 2008 10:32 pm ET)
         

      Who is this brainless Idiot!  Everytime they lose an election, they start yelling, "The sky is falling...the sky is falling!" 

      This old argument about the welfare moms is as antiquated as this fool spewing this vile stuff!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bezoar23 (December 10, 2008 10:32 am ET)
         

      I’ve got news for the welfare naieve out there. I live in KY and that happens all the time regardless of which administration is in place. It won’t be any better or worse after Obama takes office. It’s a flaw in the “system” not the political party.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pithaughn (December 10, 2008 6:51 pm ET)
         
      Does anyone know, or even know somwone who knows a person on welfare that has a plasma TV? Enough with the stereotypes already. Surely there must be enough actual policy and legislation that they could criticize without using vile stereotypes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (December 10, 2008 7:31 pm ET)
         
      Speaking of welfare states, we already live in one, jackass. Look around you. Bush has spent 8 years championing welfare for the wealthy. Which is fine by the Right. The rich deserve it because, well, they're rich. But give a dollar to a poor person and the chorus of indignant conservative screams threatens to topple the heavens. And, burrowed in that diatribe, is my favorite rightwing talking point, that having a TV is the standard of opulence in America, not a basic amenity, including plasma TVs, which are now cheap as a low def TV used to be. Next the poor will want food and clothes. Ugh. I'm so sick of these D-student dullards lecturing us as if we, the A-students backed by facts and history, are the stupid ones.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by matrixbio2014 (December 11, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
         

      Another quirk of Rick Roberts that is soooooooooo moronic, is he asks any caller disagreeing with him (even if it is respectfully) for ethnic/demographic identification.  Goes to show that it all boils down to your tribe with these people. 

      Report Abuse