About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Ben Stein rejects conservatives' Obama socialism charges

February 27, 2009 9:40 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by LuvLuLu (February 27, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
         

      Ben Stein agrees with those on the left who say that Bush was asleep at the wheel while this economic crisis gained steam. He even says that Paulson is so culpable he might even be criminally liable!

      It seems like, in too many ways, the Bush Administration purposely let the nation crumble in order to hurt the Democratic adminstration they knew were going to win in 2008.

      I don't believe in MIHOP or even LIHOP when it comes to 9-11. But when it comes to the economy, or letting Afghanistan stagnate or ruining our ability to actually prosecute terrorists, I do believe that they tried to screw us.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 27, 2009 10:29 pm ET)
         
      Gee, when the lunatic-fringe likes of Ben Stein is the sensible one in the room, you know that CPAC and the gops are as certifiable as the oxy-moron
      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (February 27, 2009 10:32 pm ET)
         
      He's not a lunatic. Just a proud economic royalist. A classic republican-- you can deal with them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jwcoop715110 (February 27, 2009 10:36 pm ET)
         

      Yeah, he's not as nuts as most, but he's still a wacko. Fortunately, UVM gassed him as their commencement speaker this May.

      Times are tough enough without his lunacy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by theclocktowersniper8151 (February 27, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
         
      It doesn't matter what Ben Stein says or any other pundit. Obama is a socialist and has proved it his first 30 days in office. The Dow is nosediving, nationalizing of banks in being talked about, the auto industry is in hock to the government and the housing industry is tanking due to Obama's policies. What more evidence is needed?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (February 27, 2009 11:15 pm ET)
           
        What are we? 35 days into this Administration.  Too early for judgement at this point, although there is plenty of blame to spread around.  I think, at least for now, the blame lies at the feet of the previous administration and previous Congress.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (February 28, 2009 8:48 am ET)
             
          Thanks Oscar.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (February 28, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
             
          In retrospect to my earlier remarks, some of the blame for the current conditions also lies at the the feet of "we the people".
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (February 27, 2009 11:47 pm ET)
           
        The clock tower snipers never survive their attacks. They should just shoot themselves first and save the populace and the police the grief and trouble.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Chas128 (February 28, 2009 12:06 am ET)
             

          More stunning than the comments of clocktower are that there are people like him that actually believe that all this happened within 30 days.  i.e. the housing markey crumbling - it was FINE 31 days ago, right?

          The reality is that this has been known for years, it's all been watched as it came on and the fiscally conservative republicans let it happen while they profited like mad before the bubble burst.

           I had someone mention the DOW to me the other day, just aghast at how it's plunging.  This is an educated man who understands that when it was going up it was because companies were profitable and paying dividends - dividends that came from outsourcing american jobs and industries to the point that there's no work left here for americans to do.

           The Dow is not the end all in how we are doing as an economy.  The fortune 500 could lay off half their workers and show higher profits and pay dividens - their stock would be in demand and the Dow would rise, yet our economy would be in worse shape.  Likewise when it goes up, that doesn't mean that the people are prospering.

           All the Dow means is those 500 companies aren't paying dividends and I'm NOT saying that the economy isn't in bad shape, simply that the shrieking about the Dow plummeting is just so much false noise that has a very limited meaning.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (February 28, 2009 7:26 am ET)
           
        What's even worse is that he made the economy nosedive 2 months before he was elected!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (February 28, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
           

        You do realize that the great socialist Ronald Reagan was the one who first nationalized a large banking corporation, right?  The Continental Illinois Bank and Trust was nationalized in 1984.  The FDIC took it over and spent nearly six years running the bank and selling it off in pieces.  It worked rather well.  Just as it was always meant to work.

        Federal control of banks has existed since the FDIC was invented - some would even say it goes back as far as Alexander Hamilton.  If you are unaware of this, I would suggest maybe you take a laptop up in the clocktower with you and perhaps get a historical perspective before you make a fool of yourself with your boogieman name-calling.  No one is afraid of the word socialist anymore.  It did not work when your ilk tried it against FDR and it is not working now.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Mrs. Teufelshunde (February 28, 2009 12:00 am ET)
         
      Looks like SOMEBODY didn't get invited to CPAC!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Chazzum (February 28, 2009 12:33 am ET)
         

      Bueller? .....Bueller???

       

      Hey, somebody had to do it!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by balanceofpower (February 28, 2009 2:14 am ET)
         

      Now I am completely and utterly dumb-struck: within a week's time David Brooks and now Ben Stein are repudiating the GOP's positions.

      On one hand it is reassuring and on the other I have to scratch my head.

      Didn't MMFA highlight a Glenn Beck interview with Ben Stein a few weeks before the election where they made all manner of untrue suggestions about Barack Obama? Now he seems content to own up to the party's failure. Go figure.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (February 28, 2009 3:17 am ET)
           
        I don't get it either. His commentary on CBS Sunday Morning program always made my Sunday New York Times reading blood boil :o).
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Ralphie (February 28, 2009 11:26 am ET)
           
        Methinks Mr. Stein's net worth may have taken a disastrous hit as a result of the recent goings on and he has seen the light.  
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (February 28, 2009 6:47 am ET)
         
      FINALLY...MMFA posts an example of conservative misinformation
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 28, 2009 12:55 pm ET)
         
      Finally...oh please, tell us more. Or are you just a tease?
      Report Abuse