About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Steele tells Hannity: "If you go back and listen to that exchange, there was no attack on Rush"

March 04, 2009 9:55 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by fawltylogic (March 04, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
         
      I agree. "Incendiary" and "ugly" are in fact to be seen as compliments when it comes to Rush.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mattcable250650 (March 04, 2009 10:16 pm ET)
         

      Bwah-hah-hah!!!! I think the Romans had their defeated enemies do this, but they did it in a more graphic manner. They crossed their spears and their once-enemies had to walk under the spears.

      Of course, this is resembling a Chinese Communist "self-criticism" session now.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (March 05, 2009 9:04 am ET)
         
      Luckily Seannie looks at no previous tape, based on his reporting skills.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 05, 2009 11:03 am ET)
         
      I think Steele is right.  I didn't see that as an attack on Limbaugh.  It wasn't even a criticism of Limbaugh.  It was an acknowledgement of what he does.  Do you think Limbaugh doesn't know his comments are incendiary and at times ugly?  The real mystery is why Steele apologized.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RABBITLUVR (March 05, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
         
      If there was no attack, Steele, then what the hell did you apologize for? You really are a pathetic spineless coward... not that I have any issues with it. The more your side cannibalizes itself the better.
      Report Abuse